Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops
Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected gen...
Saved in:
Published in | Crop science Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 890 - 902 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madison
Crop Science Society of America
01.05.2008
American Society of Agronomy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity >or= among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half‐sib or full‐sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among‐and‐within‐family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny‐test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny‐test selection. Among‐and‐within‐family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within‐family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among‐and‐within‐family selection is favored over progeny‐test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual‐plant basis (relative to heritability on a family‐mean basis), (ii) within‐family selection intensity ≥ among‐family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half‐sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full‐sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive. Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity ≥ among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity >or= among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive. |
Author | Brummer, E.C Casler, M.D |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Casler, M.D – sequence: 2 fullname: Brummer, E.C |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20416317$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
BookMark | eNqNkEFrGzEQhUVJoU7aX9BDRaHHdUbSrmQdwxK7gYSEOqG9CXl3ZMusJVdyaP3vq8Wm9NjTwPC992beJbkIMSAhHxlMORPNdZfiPneeA6gp6CnUWr8hE1aLpgLZiAsyAWCsYjPx4x25zHkLhdSqmZDt8wZjwoPv7EBvf--xO2BPFxjGFV1YHzJ1MdGbXQzryoa--u4PGx-qud354UiXOBSJj4E-4GET-0x9oE-YMARfHOcx2TXSdrzvPXnr7JDxw3lekZf57XP7tbp_XNy1N_dVV2uuq5VEqTpoxEw6tpJKMSVl0wmJirNZb5VyK2kdWMTyn264W3HdNFK4useZleKKfD757lP8-Yr5YLbxNYUSaTjjUgCveYHECSrV5ZzQmX3yO5uOhoEZOzX_dGpAm7HTovpytra5FOaSDZ3Pf6UcaiYFU4Wbn7hffsDj_1ibdtny9tvj07K9G_egz4GfTkbORmPXqYS9LDkwASMAJeoPETqY2w |
CODEN | CRPSAY |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2015_03_0142 crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12080 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_11_0688 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_01673 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_03_0143 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0227 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_01580 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_020_02605_x crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_09_0559 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13173459 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0273 crossref_primary_10_1111_pbr_12115 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_011_9166_y crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_01_0031 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_03_0193 crossref_primary_10_1002_tpg2_20306 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0272 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20278 crossref_primary_10_1080_02571862_2018_1465135 crossref_primary_10_17660_ActaHortic_2018_1203_2 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_07_0434 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_770461 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20793 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2016_09_0770 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21200 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_016_1677_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_92537_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_023_08340_5 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN14833 crossref_primary_10_13080_z_a_2013_100_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10091410 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_015_9709_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_g3journal_jkab249 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_01364 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_013_9374_8 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_01_0026 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_020_03666_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcbb_12983 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_07_0456 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10050742 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_08_0575 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_756768 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_017_9867_y crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_05_0353 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_017_3030_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20464 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_017_9849_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20767 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_06_0441 crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2014_898462 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1003215 crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2015_68114 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_06_0363 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_013_2258_7 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_08_0485 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00276 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_4499_0108 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy2010040 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_010_9105_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10030340 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_06_0390 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12863_017_0589_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10081134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2022_108657 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy6040060 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_08_0543 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2016_00133 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10030688 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2011_02_0105 crossref_primary_10_1071_CP13361 crossref_primary_10_1534_g3_115_024950 crossref_primary_10_3835_plantgenome2011_10_0026 crossref_primary_10_3835_plantgenome2015_11_0110 crossref_primary_10_5504_BBEQ_2011_0047 crossref_primary_10_1071_CP13323 crossref_primary_10_1142_S233954781540004X crossref_primary_10_1590_S1984_70332011000400006 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2015_02_0125 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41437_018_0156_0 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_08_0495 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_017_2031_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12035 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_017_1856_x crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_02_0105 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10121845 crossref_primary_10_1111_pbr_12025 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2019_02_0126 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_015_1399_y crossref_primary_10_17221_90_2009_CJGPB crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_05_0319 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_023_03179_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400010026x 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020008x 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000040012x 10.4141/cjps73-157 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71012-7 10.2134/agronmonogr29.c30 10.1515/9783110837520 10.1007/BF00021905 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1961.tb00214.x 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0229 10.2134/agronj1999.915787x 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00238.x 10.1007/BF02860830 10.4141/cjps72-035 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01933.x 10.2135/cropsci2004.2930 10.2134/agronj2002.7820 10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0267 10.1017/S0021859605005599 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00665.x 10.1007/BF00226874 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040013x 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040029x 10.2134/agronmonogr34.c14 10.1007/s10681-007-9390-x 10.1007/BF00023725 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0780 10.2135/cropsci2005.0388 10.1017/S0021859603003058 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900020036x 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040030x 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00230.x 10.2135/cropsci2005.0044 10.2135/cropsci2005.0196 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc. 2008 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2008 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc. – notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2008 |
DBID | FBQ IQODW AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X2 7XB 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FK 8G5 ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ L6V M0K M2O M2P M7S MBDVC PATMY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY Q9U R05 S0X |
DOI | 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0499 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS Pascal-Francis CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest Engineering Collection Agricultural Science Database ProQuest research library ProQuest Science Journals Engineering Database Research Library (Corporate) Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic University of Michigan SIRS Editorial |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database University of Michigan Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Research Library Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database – sequence: 2 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1435-0653 |
EndPage | 902 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1534439781 10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499 20416317 CSC2CROPSCI2007090499 US201300904017 |
Genre | article Feature |
GroupedDBID | -~X .86 .~0 0R~ 186 18M 1OB 1OC 29F 2A4 2WC 33P 3V. 53G 5GY 6J9 6KN 7X2 7XC 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8G5 8R4 8R5 AAHHS AANLZ ABCQX ABCUV ABEFU ABJCF ABJNI ABPTK ABUWG ACAWQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACXQS ADFRT ADKYN ADNWM ADYHW ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AETEA AEUYR AFFPM AFKRA AFRAH AI. AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BES BFHJK BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKOMP BPHCQ C1A CCPQU CS3 D0L DCZOG DROCM DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD F5P FBQ GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ HF~ IAG IAO ICU IEA IEP IGG IOF ITC L6V L7B LAS LATKE LEEKS M0K M2O M2P M2Q M4Y M7S MEWTI MV1 NHAZY NHB NU0 O9- PATMY PQQKQ PRG PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q2X R05 RAK ROL RPX RXW S0X SAMSI SUPJJ TAE TR2 TWZ U2A U5U VH1 VQA WOQ WXSBR XOL Y6R ~02 ~KM AAHBH AHBTC AITYG H13 HGLYW 08R IQODW TAF AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK MBDVC PQEST PQUKI Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4929-b6e67c05386f1b67717665c36e7218da77fb6af0aee435952fb295563f4de8a63 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0011-183X |
IngestDate | Mon Nov 11 05:01:13 EST 2024 Thu Sep 26 19:40:06 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 29 17:09:37 EDT 2023 Sat Aug 24 01:09:07 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 27 19:03:40 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Genetic gain Family selection Fodder crop Breeding scheme Perennial plant |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4929-b6e67c05386f1b67717665c36e7218da77fb6af0aee435952fb295563f4de8a63 |
Notes | http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17580 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0499 All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. |
PQID | 212630242 |
PQPubID | 30013 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_212630242 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499 pascalfrancis_primary_20416317 wiley_primary_10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499_CSC2CROPSCI2007090499 fao_agris_US201300904017 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May–June 2008 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2008 text: May–June 2008 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Madison |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Madison – name: Madison, WI |
PublicationTitle | Crop science |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | Crop Science Society of America American Society of Agronomy |
Publisher_xml | – name: Crop Science Society of America – name: American Society of Agronomy |
References | 2004; 44 1990; 30 2001; 71 1974; 14 1990; 79 1973; 53 2002; 94 2008 1996 2007 2005 1998; 117 2003 2002 2005; 45 1961; 16 1999 1998; 38 1969; 9 2007; 156 2005; 143 2002; 121 2006; 46 1993; 11 2000; 55 1984; 33 2003; 140 2008; 48 1986 1985 1983 1978; 27 1975; 41 1972; 52 1999; 91 2007; 47 1988 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 Vogel K.P. (e_1_2_7_42_1) 1993; 11 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_1_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 Tomes D.T. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 1983 Dijk G.E. (e_1_2_7_38_1) 1983 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 Falconer D.S. (e_1_2_7_20_1) 1996 Ikegawa F. (e_1_2_7_31_1) 1985 Humphreys M.O. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1999 Dijk G.E. (e_1_2_7_39_1) 1978; 27 Gallais A. (e_1_2_7_22_1) 2003 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 Sandha G.S. (e_1_2_7_34_1) 1973; 53 Brummer E.C. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2008 e_1_2_7_21_1 Velde M. (e_1_2_7_40_1) 2002 Brummer E.C. (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2005 e_1_2_7_37_1 Walsh B. (e_1_2_7_43_1) 2007 Casler M.D. (e_1_2_7_12_1) 2008; 48 Twamley B.E. (e_1_2_7_36_1) 1972; 52 |
References_xml | – volume: 143 start-page: 441 year: 2005 end-page: 448 article-title: Genetic improvement of forage crops: Past, present and future publication-title: J. Agric. Sci. – volume: 91 start-page: 787 year: 1999 end-page: 795 article-title: Response of selected and unselected bahiagrass populations to defoliation publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 156 start-page: 407 year: 2007 end-page: 415 article-title: Effects of high‐ vs. low‐yield environments on selection for increased biomass yield in switchgrass publication-title: Euphytica – start-page: 218 year: 1983 end-page: 220 – volume: 45 start-page: 388 year: 2005 end-page: 398 article-title: Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the northern USA publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 48 start-page: 434 year: 2008 end-page: 442 article-title: Among‐and‐within‐family selection in eight forage grass populations publication-title: Crop Sci. – start-page: 413 year: 1996 end-page: 469 – volume: 16 start-page: 69 year: 1961 end-page: 75 article-title: Differential survival of cultivars of , and publication-title: J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. – year: 2005 – start-page: 211 year: 1985 end-page: 213 – volume: 94 start-page: 782 year: 2002 end-page: 785 article-title: Agronomic consequences of dormant‐nondormant alfalfa mixtures publication-title: Agron. J. – year: 2007 – start-page: 63. year: 2005 – year: 2003 – volume: 140 start-page: 129 year: 2003 end-page: 150 article-title: Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture publication-title: J. Agric. Sci. – volume: 121 start-page: 43 year: 2002 end-page: 48 article-title: Half‐sib family selection for forage yield in orchardgrass publication-title: Plant Breed. – year: 1996 – volume: 55 start-page: 351 year: 2000 end-page: 360 article-title: Genetic shifts in smooth bromegrass under grazing: Changes in nutritional value and preference for surviving vs. original genotypes publication-title: Grass Forage Sci. – volume: 38 start-page: 333 year: 1998 end-page: 336 article-title: Yield distributions of spaced plants with Pensacola bahiagrass populations developed by recurrent restricted phenotypic selection publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 46 start-page: 1277 year: 2006 end-page: 1285 article-title: Selection for establishment capacity in reed canarygrass publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 27 start-page: 855 year: 1978 end-page: 860 article-title: Testing perennial ryegrass ( L.) as spaced plants in swards publication-title: Euphytica – volume: 30 start-page: 825 year: 1990 end-page: 831 article-title: Ground cover potential of forage grass cultivars in binary mixtures with alfalfa at divergent locations publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 48 year: 2008 article-title: Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses publication-title: Crop Sci. – start-page: 130 year: 1983 end-page: 132 – volume: 79 start-page: 618 year: 1990 end-page: 624 article-title: Theory and application of open‐pollination and polycross in forage grass breeding publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet. – volume: 45 start-page: 44 year: 2005 end-page: 50 article-title: Heterosis and inbreeding depression for forage yield and fiber concentration in smooth bromegrass publication-title: Crop Sci. – year: 1986 – start-page: 71 year: 1999 end-page: 78 – volume: 14 start-page: 87 year: 1974 end-page: 90 article-title: Recurrent selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 11 start-page: 251 year: 1993 end-page: 274 article-title: Breeding systems for cross‐pollinated perennial grasses publication-title: Plant Breed. Rev. – volume: 53 start-page: 811 year: 1973 end-page: 815 article-title: Recurrent selection for seed yield improvement in , cult publication-title: Leo. Can. J. Plant Sci. – volume: 44 start-page: 293 year: 2004 end-page: 303 article-title: Latitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations publication-title: Crop Sci. – year: 2002 – year: 2008 – year: 1988 – volume: 9 start-page: 228 year: 1969 end-page: 231 article-title: Estimates of genetic variance in ‘Cherokee’ alfalfa ( L.) publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 47 start-page: 2249 year: 2007 end-page: 2260 article-title: Latitudinal and longitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 117 start-page: 243 year: 1998 end-page: 249 article-title: Genetic variation within eight populations of perennial forage grasses publication-title: Plant Breed. – volume: 41 start-page: 361 year: 1975 end-page: 390 article-title: On Ö. Winge and a prayer: The origins of polyploidy publication-title: Bot. Rev. – volume: 14 start-page: 591 year: 1974 end-page: 593 article-title: Comparison of selection methods for autotetraploids: II. Selection for disease resistance in alfalfa publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 33 start-page: 787 year: 1984 end-page: 800 article-title: Selection for yield in : II. Performance of spaced plant selections under competitive conditions publication-title: Euphytica – volume: 52 start-page: 227 year: 1972 end-page: 232 article-title: Genotypic, phenotypic, and geno‐phenotypic methods of selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil publication-title: Can. J. Plant Sci. – volume: 71 start-page: 51 year: 2001 end-page: 107 article-title: Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value publication-title: Adv. Agron. – volume: 14 start-page: 587 year: 1974 end-page: 590 article-title: Comparison of selection methods for autotetraploids: I. Theoretical publication-title: Crop Sci. – start-page: 931 year: 1988 end-page: 960 – volume-title: Quantitative genetics resources. Vol. 2. Evolution and selection of quantitative traits year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 contributor: fullname: Walsh B. – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400010026x – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020008x – volume-title: An introduction to quantitative genetics year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 contributor: fullname: Falconer D.S. – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000040012x – volume: 53 start-page: 811 year: 1973 ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 article-title: Recurrent selection for seed yield improvement in Lotus corniculatus, cult publication-title: Leo. Can. J. Plant Sci. doi: 10.4141/cjps73-157 contributor: fullname: Sandha G.S. – volume-title: Molecular breeding of forage and turf year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 contributor: fullname: Brummer E.C. – start-page: 71 volume-title: Proc. 18th Int. Grassl. Congr., Winnipeg and Saskatoon, Canada. 8–19 June 1997 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 contributor: fullname: Humphreys M.O. – start-page: 63. volume-title: 20th Int year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 contributor: fullname: Brummer E.C. – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71012-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr29.c30 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1515/9783110837520 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00021905 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1961.tb00214.x – volume: 48 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 article-title: Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses publication-title: Crop Sci. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0229 contributor: fullname: Casler M.D. – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj1999.915787x – volume: 11 start-page: 251 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 article-title: Breeding systems for cross‐pollinated perennial grasses publication-title: Plant Breed. Rev. contributor: fullname: Vogel K.P. – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00238.x – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02860830 – volume: 52 start-page: 227 year: 1972 ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 article-title: Genotypic, phenotypic, and geno‐phenotypic methods of selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil publication-title: Can. J. Plant Sci. doi: 10.4141/cjps72-035 contributor: fullname: Twamley B.E. – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01933.x – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.2930 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.7820 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0267 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005599 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00665.x – ident: e_1_2_7_1_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00226874 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040013x – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040029x – start-page: 211 volume-title: Proc. 15th Intl. Grassl. Congr., Kyoto, Japan. 24–31 Aug. 1985 year: 1985 ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 contributor: fullname: Ikegawa F. – volume-title: Proc. 38th North Am. Alfalfa Improvement Conf., 27–31 July 2002, Sacramento, CA year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 contributor: fullname: Velde M. – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr34.c14 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9390-x – volume: 27 start-page: 855 year: 1978 ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 article-title: Testing perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) as spaced plants in swards publication-title: Euphytica doi: 10.1007/BF00023725 contributor: fullname: Dijk G.E. – start-page: 130 volume-title: Proc. 14th Int. Grassl. Congr., Lexington, KY. 15–25 June 1981 year: 1983 ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 contributor: fullname: Dijk G.E. – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0780 – volume-title: Quantitative genetics and breeding methods in autopolyploid plants year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 contributor: fullname: Gallais A. – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0388 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1017/S0021859603003058 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900020036x – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040030x – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00230.x – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0044 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0196 – start-page: 218 volume-title: Proc. 14th Int. Grassl. Congr., Lexington, KY. 15–25 June 1981 year: 1983 ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 contributor: fullname: Tomes D.T. |
SSID | ssj0007975 |
Score | 2.2981734 |
Snippet | Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pascalfrancis wiley fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 890 |
SubjectTerms | additive gene effects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions among-and-within-family selection method artificial selection Biological and medical sciences Breeding schemes. Varia Cereal crops Forage crops Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genetic correlation Genetic improvement Genetic variance Genetics Genetics and breeding of economic plants heritability Methods perennials plant breeding Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology selection criteria selection intensity selection methods Studies Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims |
Title | Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2135%2Fcropsci2007.09.0499 https://www.proquest.com/docview/212630242 |
Volume | 48 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV09b9swED3UztIORfqFuGkNDh3LRpJpUpwCR4iTFEhqxDHgjSApMnUHOY3c_987SXbjpcgqCATFd7x7FO_uAXxByBOvVODOa8HRKHLuUhd5KaRQ41TG0BTSXt_Iy4X4vhwvu9ycukur3PrExlGXa0__yE_QxcoRBZTTh9-cRKPocrVT0OjBQYYHhaQPB2fnN7PbnStWWnUSBilH2122bYeydDQ-IYEsDDJtD0P9jZj_XmjqRbumRElb41rFVuRij4U-5bJNMJoewuuORbJJC_sbeBGqt_Bqcv_YddII7-DX3b8SRUYNjT1yS0ZdpvERu7CrqmZIWNmE1Ia4rSh1dvNzVfFWCoPNG4EcRI1dNyLTNVtVbEbFgRWaLJui6dwHVtD3vYfF9PyuuOSdsAL3AukQdzJI5XH75TKmTipFXSLHfiQDngfz0ioVnbQxsSEIKtzNoss0dRKLogy5laMP0K_WVTgClsjE61gK530pUit0Woag8-CjUMLqfABft2tqHtr-GQbPHQSBeQKBSbQhCAZwhOtuLK5XbRbzjO5VE42OJlUDGO6BsRsuS4hU0gvHW3RMtxFrszObAZw2gD1nFqaYF1lx-2M2L67oOc1A64__Hf8YXrapJJQL-Qn6m8c_4TPylY0bQi-fXgw72_wLTWjmUg |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,12777,21400,27936,27937,33385,33756,43612,43817,74363,74630 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NbxMxEB3RcgAOiE81FIoPHDHdD8den6poRZpCUyqSSLlZttcu4bAp3fD_mdndhOaCuK5WltdvPPO8npkH8AEhT7xSgTuvBUejKLhLXeSVkEINUxlDW0g7vZKThfiyHC773JymT6vc-sTWUVdrT__IT9HFypwCytntL06iUXS52itoHMBDkWOopkLx8fnOESutegGDlKPlLrumQ1maD09JHgtDTNfBUH8i3r8XmA6iXVOapG1wpWIncbHHQe8z2TYUjZ_B055DslEH-nN4EOoX8GR0c9f30Qgv4ef8b4Eio3bGHpklox7T-Iid21XdMKSrbERaQ9zWlDi7-bGqeSeEwWatPA5ixqatxHTDVjW7ptLAGg2WjdFwbgIr6ftewWL8eV5OeC-rwL1AMsSdDFJ53HyFjKmTSlGPyKHPZcDTYFFZpaKTNiY2BEFlu1l0maY-YlFUobAyfw2H9boOR8ASmXgdK-G8r0RqhU6rEHQRfBRKWF0M4ON2Tc1t1z3D4KmDIDD3IDCJNgTBAI5w3Y3F9WrMYpbRrWqi0c2kagAne2DshssSopT0wvEWHdNvw8bsjGYAZy1g_zMLU87KrPz-7XpWXtBzmoHWb_45_nt4NJlPL83lxdXXY3jcJZVQVuRbONzc_Q7vkLls3Elrn38A8ujm9w |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NTxsxELVKkKr2UNEvESjUhx7rZnfj2OsTCltSaEsaESLlZtleG9LDBtj0_3dm1wnkUvVqWZZ3ZjwzXs-8R8gnUHnipPTMOsUZGEXObGoDK7ngcpCK4JtG2suxOJ_x7_PBPEIK1bGscu0TG0ddLh3-I--BixV9DCi9EKsiJl9HJ3f3DAmk8KE1smnskF3JYWaH7J6ejSdXG7cslYx0BikDO563EERZ2h_0kCwLAk6LZ6i-4C1gK0ztBLPEoklTg9xCS3ixlZE-zWubwDTaI69iRkmHrQm8Js989Ya8HN48RFQN_5b8vn5sV6QIbuwgz6SIOA1D9JtZVDWF5JUOkXmImQrLaFe3i4q1tBh02pDlgAbpZUM4XdNFRSfYKFiB-dIRmNGNpwV-3zsyG51dF-cskiwwxyE1YlZ4IR0cxVyE1AopETFy4PrCw90wL42UwQoTEuM9xybeLNhMIapY4KXPjei_J51qWfl9QhOROBVKbp0reWq4SkvvVe5d4JIblXfJ57VM9V2LpaHhDoIq0E9UoBOlUQVdsg9y1wbkVevZNMM31kSB00lllxxvKWOzXJZggokTDtfa0fFQ1npjQl1y0ijsf3ahi2mRFVe_JtPiAsdxB0od_HP9j-Q5GKf-eTH-cUhetBUmWCL5gXRWD3_8EaQxK3scDfQv-tvslA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theoretical+Expected+Genetic+Gains+for+Among%E2%80%90and%E2%80%90Within%E2%80%90Family+Selection+Methods+in+Perennial+Forage+Crops&rft.jtitle=Crop+science&rft.au=Casler%2C+Michael+D.&rft.au=Brummer%2C+E.+Charles&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.pub=Crop+Science+Society+of+America&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=890&rft.epage=902&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135%2Fcropsci2007.09.0499&rft.externalDBID=10.2135%252Fcropsci2007.09.0499&rft.externalDocID=CSC2CROPSCI2007090499 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon |