Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops

Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected gen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop science Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 890 - 902
Main Authors Casler, M.D, Brummer, E.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison Crop Science Society of America 01.05.2008
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity >or= among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive.
AbstractList Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half‐sib or full‐sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among‐and‐within‐family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny‐test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny‐test selection. Among‐and‐within‐family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within‐family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among‐and‐within‐family selection is favored over progeny‐test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual‐plant basis (relative to heritability on a family‐mean basis), (ii) within‐family selection intensity ≥ among‐family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half‐sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full‐sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive.
Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity ≥ among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that make little use of additive genetic variance within half-sib or full-sib families. The objectives of this study were (i) to compute expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family (AWF) selection methods, (ii) to compare these selection methods to standard family and progeny-test selection methods, and (iii) to define the conditions under which AWF selection methods may be superior to progeny-test selection. Among-and-within-family selection is equal to or better than family selection under all circumstances provided the within-family selection criterion (X or Y) is heritable and has a positive genetic correlation with the desired trait (Y). Among-and-within-family selection is favored over progeny-test selection by (i) high heritability on an individual-plant basis (relative to heritability on a family-mean basis), (ii) within-family selection intensity >or= among-family selection intensity, and (iii) possibly a shorter cycle time (for some species and some breeding programs). These conditions are more frequently achieved for half-sib mating systems due to the greater partitioning of additive genetic variance within families, but AWF selection can also be heavily favored in a full-sib mating system under conditions that are a bit more restrictive.
Author Brummer, E.C
Casler, M.D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Casler, M.D
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Brummer, E.C
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20416317$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqNkEFrGzEQhUVJoU7aX9BDRaHHdUbSrmQdwxK7gYSEOqG9CXl3ZMusJVdyaP3vq8Wm9NjTwPC992beJbkIMSAhHxlMORPNdZfiPneeA6gp6CnUWr8hE1aLpgLZiAsyAWCsYjPx4x25zHkLhdSqmZDt8wZjwoPv7EBvf--xO2BPFxjGFV1YHzJ1MdGbXQzryoa--u4PGx-qud354UiXOBSJj4E-4GET-0x9oE-YMARfHOcx2TXSdrzvPXnr7JDxw3lekZf57XP7tbp_XNy1N_dVV2uuq5VEqTpoxEw6tpJKMSVl0wmJirNZb5VyK2kdWMTyn264W3HdNFK4useZleKKfD757lP8-Yr5YLbxNYUSaTjjUgCveYHECSrV5ZzQmX3yO5uOhoEZOzX_dGpAm7HTovpytra5FOaSDZ3Pf6UcaiYFU4Wbn7hffsDj_1ibdtny9tvj07K9G_egz4GfTkbORmPXqYS9LDkwASMAJeoPETqY2w
CODEN CRPSAY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2015_03_0142
crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12080
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_11_0688
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_01673
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_03_0143
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0227
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_01580
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_020_02605_x
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_09_0559
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13173459
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0273
crossref_primary_10_1111_pbr_12115
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_011_9166_y
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_01_0031
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_03_0193
crossref_primary_10_1002_tpg2_20306
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_04_0272
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20278
crossref_primary_10_1080_02571862_2018_1465135
crossref_primary_10_17660_ActaHortic_2018_1203_2
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_07_0434
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_770461
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20793
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2016_09_0770
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21200
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_016_1677_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_92537_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_023_08340_5
crossref_primary_10_1071_AN14833
crossref_primary_10_13080_z_a_2013_100_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10091410
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_015_9709_8
crossref_primary_10_1093_g3journal_jkab249
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_01364
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_013_9374_8
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_01_0026
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_020_03666_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcbb_12983
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_07_0456
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10050742
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_08_0575
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_756768
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_017_9867_y
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2013_05_0353
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_017_3030_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20464
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_017_9849_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20767
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_06_0441
crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2014_898462
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1003215
crossref_primary_10_4236_ajps_2015_68114
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_06_0363
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_013_2258_7
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_08_0485
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00276
crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_4499_0108
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy2010040
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_010_9105_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10030340
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_06_0390
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12863_017_0589_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10081134
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2022_108657
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy6040060
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2014_08_0543
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2016_00133
crossref_primary_10_3390_su10030688
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2011_02_0105
crossref_primary_10_1071_CP13361
crossref_primary_10_1534_g3_115_024950
crossref_primary_10_3835_plantgenome2011_10_0026
crossref_primary_10_3835_plantgenome2015_11_0110
crossref_primary_10_5504_BBEQ_2011_0047
crossref_primary_10_1071_CP13323
crossref_primary_10_1142_S233954781540004X
crossref_primary_10_1590_S1984_70332011000400006
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2015_02_0125
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41437_018_0156_0
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2017_08_0495
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_017_2031_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12035
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_017_1856_x
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_02_0105
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10121845
crossref_primary_10_1111_pbr_12025
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2019_02_0126
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_015_1399_y
crossref_primary_10_17221_90_2009_CJGPB
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2012_05_0319
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_023_03179_0
Cites_doi 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400010026x
10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020008x
10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000040012x
10.4141/cjps73-157
10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71012-7
10.2134/agronmonogr29.c30
10.1515/9783110837520
10.1007/BF00021905
10.1111/j.1365-2494.1961.tb00214.x
10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0229
10.2134/agronj1999.915787x
10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00238.x
10.1007/BF02860830
10.4141/cjps72-035
10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01933.x
10.2135/cropsci2004.2930
10.2134/agronj2002.7820
10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0267
10.1017/S0021859605005599
10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00665.x
10.1007/BF00226874
10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040013x
10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040029x
10.2134/agronmonogr34.c14
10.1007/s10681-007-9390-x
10.1007/BF00023725
10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0780
10.2135/cropsci2005.0388
10.1017/S0021859603003058
10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900020036x
10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040030x
10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00230.x
10.2135/cropsci2005.0044
10.2135/cropsci2005.0196
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.
2008 INIST-CNRS
Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2008
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.
– notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2008
DBID FBQ
IQODW
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X2
7XB
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FK
8G5
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
L6V
M0K
M2O
M2P
M7S
MBDVC
PATMY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q9U
R05
S0X
DOI 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0499
DatabaseName AGRIS
Pascal-Francis
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Agricultural Science Database
ProQuest research library
ProQuest Science Journals
Engineering Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
University of Michigan
SIRS Editorial
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Agricultural Science Database
University of Michigan
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Research Library
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Agricultural Science Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1435-0653
EndPage 902
ExternalDocumentID 1534439781
10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499
20416317
CSC2CROPSCI2007090499
US201300904017
Genre article
Feature
GroupedDBID -~X
.86
.~0
0R~
186
18M
1OB
1OC
29F
2A4
2WC
33P
3V.
53G
5GY
6J9
6KN
7X2
7XC
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8G5
8R4
8R5
AAHHS
AANLZ
ABCQX
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABPTK
ABUWG
ACAWQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACXQS
ADFRT
ADKYN
ADNWM
ADYHW
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AETEA
AEUYR
AFFPM
AFKRA
AFRAH
AI.
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMYDB
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BES
BFHJK
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKOMP
BPHCQ
C1A
CCPQU
CS3
D0L
DCZOG
DROCM
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
F5P
FBQ
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HF~
IAG
IAO
ICU
IEA
IEP
IGG
IOF
ITC
L6V
L7B
LAS
LATKE
LEEKS
M0K
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M4Y
M7S
MEWTI
MV1
NHAZY
NHB
NU0
O9-
PATMY
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
R05
RAK
ROL
RPX
RXW
S0X
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TAE
TR2
TWZ
U2A
U5U
VH1
VQA
WOQ
WXSBR
XOL
Y6R
~02
~KM
AAHBH
AHBTC
AITYG
H13
HGLYW
08R
IQODW
TAF
AAYXX
CITATION
7XB
8FK
MBDVC
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4929-b6e67c05386f1b67717665c36e7218da77fb6af0aee435952fb295563f4de8a63
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0011-183X
IngestDate Mon Nov 11 05:01:13 EST 2024
Thu Sep 26 19:40:06 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 29 17:09:37 EDT 2023
Sat Aug 24 01:09:07 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 27 19:03:40 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Genetic gain
Family selection
Fodder crop
Breeding scheme
Perennial plant
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4929-b6e67c05386f1b67717665c36e7218da77fb6af0aee435952fb295563f4de8a63
Notes http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17580
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0499
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
PQID 212630242
PQPubID 30013
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_212630242
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499
pascalfrancis_primary_20416317
wiley_primary_10_2135_cropsci2007_09_0499_CSC2CROPSCI2007090499
fao_agris_US201300904017
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May–June 2008
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2008
  text: May–June 2008
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Madison
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Madison
– name: Madison, WI
PublicationTitle Crop science
PublicationYear 2008
Publisher Crop Science Society of America
American Society of Agronomy
Publisher_xml – name: Crop Science Society of America
– name: American Society of Agronomy
References 2004; 44
1990; 30
2001; 71
1974; 14
1990; 79
1973; 53
2002; 94
2008
1996
2007
2005
1998; 117
2003
2002
2005; 45
1961; 16
1999
1998; 38
1969; 9
2007; 156
2005; 143
2002; 121
2006; 46
1993; 11
2000; 55
1984; 33
2003; 140
2008; 48
1986
1985
1983
1978; 27
1975; 41
1972; 52
1999; 91
2007; 47
1988
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
Vogel K.P. (e_1_2_7_42_1) 1993; 11
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_41_1
e_1_2_7_1_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_44_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_45_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
Tomes D.T. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 1983
Dijk G.E. (e_1_2_7_38_1) 1983
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
Falconer D.S. (e_1_2_7_20_1) 1996
Ikegawa F. (e_1_2_7_31_1) 1985
Humphreys M.O. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1999
Dijk G.E. (e_1_2_7_39_1) 1978; 27
Gallais A. (e_1_2_7_22_1) 2003
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
Sandha G.S. (e_1_2_7_34_1) 1973; 53
Brummer E.C. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2008
e_1_2_7_21_1
Velde M. (e_1_2_7_40_1) 2002
Brummer E.C. (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2005
e_1_2_7_37_1
Walsh B. (e_1_2_7_43_1) 2007
Casler M.D. (e_1_2_7_12_1) 2008; 48
Twamley B.E. (e_1_2_7_36_1) 1972; 52
References_xml – volume: 143
  start-page: 441
  year: 2005
  end-page: 448
  article-title: Genetic improvement of forage crops: Past, present and future
  publication-title: J. Agric. Sci.
– volume: 91
  start-page: 787
  year: 1999
  end-page: 795
  article-title: Response of selected and unselected bahiagrass populations to defoliation
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 156
  start-page: 407
  year: 2007
  end-page: 415
  article-title: Effects of high‐ vs. low‐yield environments on selection for increased biomass yield in switchgrass
  publication-title: Euphytica
– start-page: 218
  year: 1983
  end-page: 220
– volume: 45
  start-page: 388
  year: 2005
  end-page: 398
  article-title: Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the northern USA
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 434
  year: 2008
  end-page: 442
  article-title: Among‐and‐within‐family selection in eight forage grass populations
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– start-page: 413
  year: 1996
  end-page: 469
– volume: 16
  start-page: 69
  year: 1961
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Differential survival of cultivars of , and
  publication-title: J. Brit. Grassl. Soc.
– year: 2005
– start-page: 211
  year: 1985
  end-page: 213
– volume: 94
  start-page: 782
  year: 2002
  end-page: 785
  article-title: Agronomic consequences of dormant‐nondormant alfalfa mixtures
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– year: 2007
– start-page: 63.
  year: 2005
– year: 2003
– volume: 140
  start-page: 129
  year: 2003
  end-page: 150
  article-title: Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture
  publication-title: J. Agric. Sci.
– volume: 121
  start-page: 43
  year: 2002
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Half‐sib family selection for forage yield in orchardgrass
  publication-title: Plant Breed.
– year: 1996
– volume: 55
  start-page: 351
  year: 2000
  end-page: 360
  article-title: Genetic shifts in smooth bromegrass under grazing: Changes in nutritional value and preference for surviving vs. original genotypes
  publication-title: Grass Forage Sci.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 333
  year: 1998
  end-page: 336
  article-title: Yield distributions of spaced plants with Pensacola bahiagrass populations developed by recurrent restricted phenotypic selection
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1277
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1285
  article-title: Selection for establishment capacity in reed canarygrass
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 855
  year: 1978
  end-page: 860
  article-title: Testing perennial ryegrass ( L.) as spaced plants in swards
  publication-title: Euphytica
– volume: 30
  start-page: 825
  year: 1990
  end-page: 831
  article-title: Ground cover potential of forage grass cultivars in binary mixtures with alfalfa at divergent locations
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 48
  year: 2008
  article-title: Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– start-page: 130
  year: 1983
  end-page: 132
– volume: 79
  start-page: 618
  year: 1990
  end-page: 624
  article-title: Theory and application of open‐pollination and polycross in forage grass breeding
  publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet.
– volume: 45
  start-page: 44
  year: 2005
  end-page: 50
  article-title: Heterosis and inbreeding depression for forage yield and fiber concentration in smooth bromegrass
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– year: 1986
– start-page: 71
  year: 1999
  end-page: 78
– volume: 14
  start-page: 87
  year: 1974
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Recurrent selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 251
  year: 1993
  end-page: 274
  article-title: Breeding systems for cross‐pollinated perennial grasses
  publication-title: Plant Breed. Rev.
– volume: 53
  start-page: 811
  year: 1973
  end-page: 815
  article-title: Recurrent selection for seed yield improvement in , cult
  publication-title: Leo. Can. J. Plant Sci.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 293
  year: 2004
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Latitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– year: 2002
– year: 2008
– year: 1988
– volume: 9
  start-page: 228
  year: 1969
  end-page: 231
  article-title: Estimates of genetic variance in ‘Cherokee’ alfalfa ( L.)
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 47
  start-page: 2249
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2260
  article-title: Latitudinal and longitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 117
  start-page: 243
  year: 1998
  end-page: 249
  article-title: Genetic variation within eight populations of perennial forage grasses
  publication-title: Plant Breed.
– volume: 41
  start-page: 361
  year: 1975
  end-page: 390
  article-title: On Ö. Winge and a prayer: The origins of polyploidy
  publication-title: Bot. Rev.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 591
  year: 1974
  end-page: 593
  article-title: Comparison of selection methods for autotetraploids: II. Selection for disease resistance in alfalfa
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 787
  year: 1984
  end-page: 800
  article-title: Selection for yield in : II. Performance of spaced plant selections under competitive conditions
  publication-title: Euphytica
– volume: 52
  start-page: 227
  year: 1972
  end-page: 232
  article-title: Genotypic, phenotypic, and geno‐phenotypic methods of selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil
  publication-title: Can. J. Plant Sci.
– volume: 71
  start-page: 51
  year: 2001
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value
  publication-title: Adv. Agron.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 587
  year: 1974
  end-page: 590
  article-title: Comparison of selection methods for autotetraploids: I. Theoretical
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– start-page: 931
  year: 1988
  end-page: 960
– volume-title: Quantitative genetics resources. Vol. 2. Evolution and selection of quantitative traits
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_7_43_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Walsh B.
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400010026x
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020008x
– volume-title: An introduction to quantitative genetics
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Falconer D.S.
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000040012x
– volume: 53
  start-page: 811
  year: 1973
  ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  article-title: Recurrent selection for seed yield improvement in Lotus corniculatus, cult
  publication-title: Leo. Can. J. Plant Sci.
  doi: 10.4141/cjps73-157
  contributor:
    fullname: Sandha G.S.
– volume-title: Molecular breeding of forage and turf
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Brummer E.C.
– start-page: 71
  volume-title: Proc. 18th Int. Grassl. Congr., Winnipeg and Saskatoon, Canada. 8–19 June 1997
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Humphreys M.O.
– start-page: 63.
  volume-title: 20th Int
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Brummer E.C.
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71012-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_41_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr29.c30
– ident: e_1_2_7_45_1
  doi: 10.1515/9783110837520
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00021905
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1961.tb00214.x
– volume: 48
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  article-title: Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0229
  contributor:
    fullname: Casler M.D.
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj1999.915787x
– volume: 11
  start-page: 251
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_7_42_1
  article-title: Breeding systems for cross‐pollinated perennial grasses
  publication-title: Plant Breed. Rev.
  contributor:
    fullname: Vogel K.P.
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2000.00238.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02860830
– volume: 52
  start-page: 227
  year: 1972
  ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  article-title: Genotypic, phenotypic, and geno‐phenotypic methods of selection for seedling vigor in birdsfoot trefoil
  publication-title: Can. J. Plant Sci.
  doi: 10.4141/cjps72-035
  contributor:
    fullname: Twamley B.E.
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01933.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.2930
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.7820
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0267
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005599
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00665.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_1_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00226874
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040013x
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040029x
– start-page: 211
  volume-title: Proc. 15th Intl. Grassl. Congr., Kyoto, Japan. 24–31 Aug. 1985
  year: 1985
  ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Ikegawa F.
– volume-title: Proc. 38th North Am. Alfalfa Improvement Conf., 27–31 July 2002, Sacramento, CA
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_7_40_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Velde M.
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr34.c14
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9390-x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 855
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_7_39_1
  article-title: Testing perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) as spaced plants in swards
  publication-title: Euphytica
  doi: 10.1007/BF00023725
  contributor:
    fullname: Dijk G.E.
– start-page: 130
  volume-title: Proc. 14th Int. Grassl. Congr., Lexington, KY. 15–25 June 1981
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Dijk G.E.
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.12.0780
– volume-title: Quantitative genetics and breeding methods in autopolyploid plants
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Gallais A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0388
– ident: e_1_2_7_44_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0021859603003058
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900020036x
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040030x
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00230.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0044
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0196
– start-page: 218
  volume-title: Proc. 14th Int. Grassl. Congr., Lexington, KY. 15–25 June 1981
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Tomes D.T.
SSID ssj0007975
Score 2.2981734
Snippet Genetic gains in forage yield lag far behind the gains made in grain yield of cereal crops, partly because of the use of inefficient selection methods that...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pascalfrancis
wiley
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 890
SubjectTerms additive gene effects
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
among-and-within-family selection method
artificial selection
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding schemes. Varia
Cereal crops
Forage crops
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genetic correlation
Genetic improvement
Genetic variance
Genetics
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
heritability
Methods
perennials
plant breeding
Plant breeding: fundamental aspects and methodology
selection criteria
selection intensity
selection methods
Studies
Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims
Title Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2135%2Fcropsci2007.09.0499
https://www.proquest.com/docview/212630242
Volume 48
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV09b9swED3UztIORfqFuGkNDh3LRpJpUpwCR4iTFEhqxDHgjSApMnUHOY3c_987SXbjpcgqCATFd7x7FO_uAXxByBOvVODOa8HRKHLuUhd5KaRQ41TG0BTSXt_Iy4X4vhwvu9ycukur3PrExlGXa0__yE_QxcoRBZTTh9-cRKPocrVT0OjBQYYHhaQPB2fnN7PbnStWWnUSBilH2122bYeydDQ-IYEsDDJtD0P9jZj_XmjqRbumRElb41rFVuRij4U-5bJNMJoewuuORbJJC_sbeBGqt_Bqcv_YddII7-DX3b8SRUYNjT1yS0ZdpvERu7CrqmZIWNmE1Ia4rSh1dvNzVfFWCoPNG4EcRI1dNyLTNVtVbEbFgRWaLJui6dwHVtD3vYfF9PyuuOSdsAL3AukQdzJI5XH75TKmTipFXSLHfiQDngfz0ioVnbQxsSEIKtzNoss0dRKLogy5laMP0K_WVTgClsjE61gK530pUit0Woag8-CjUMLqfABft2tqHtr-GQbPHQSBeQKBSbQhCAZwhOtuLK5XbRbzjO5VE42OJlUDGO6BsRsuS4hU0gvHW3RMtxFrszObAZw2gD1nFqaYF1lx-2M2L67oOc1A64__Hf8YXrapJJQL-Qn6m8c_4TPylY0bQi-fXgw72_wLTWjmUg
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,12777,21400,27936,27937,33385,33756,43612,43817,74363,74630
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NbxMxEB3RcgAOiE81FIoPHDHdD8den6poRZpCUyqSSLlZttcu4bAp3fD_mdndhOaCuK5WltdvPPO8npkH8AEhT7xSgTuvBUejKLhLXeSVkEINUxlDW0g7vZKThfiyHC773JymT6vc-sTWUVdrT__IT9HFypwCytntL06iUXS52itoHMBDkWOopkLx8fnOESutegGDlKPlLrumQ1maD09JHgtDTNfBUH8i3r8XmA6iXVOapG1wpWIncbHHQe8z2TYUjZ_B055DslEH-nN4EOoX8GR0c9f30Qgv4ef8b4Eio3bGHpklox7T-Iid21XdMKSrbERaQ9zWlDi7-bGqeSeEwWatPA5ixqatxHTDVjW7ptLAGg2WjdFwbgIr6ftewWL8eV5OeC-rwL1AMsSdDFJ53HyFjKmTSlGPyKHPZcDTYFFZpaKTNiY2BEFlu1l0maY-YlFUobAyfw2H9boOR8ASmXgdK-G8r0RqhU6rEHQRfBRKWF0M4ON2Tc1t1z3D4KmDIDD3IDCJNgTBAI5w3Y3F9WrMYpbRrWqi0c2kagAne2DshssSopT0wvEWHdNvw8bsjGYAZy1g_zMLU87KrPz-7XpWXtBzmoHWb_45_nt4NJlPL83lxdXXY3jcJZVQVuRbONzc_Q7vkLls3Elrn38A8ujm9w
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NTxsxELVKkKr2UNEvESjUhx7rZnfj2OsTCltSaEsaESLlZtleG9LDBtj0_3dm1wnkUvVqWZZ3ZjwzXs-8R8gnUHnipPTMOsUZGEXObGoDK7ngcpCK4JtG2suxOJ_x7_PBPEIK1bGscu0TG0ddLh3-I--BixV9DCi9EKsiJl9HJ3f3DAmk8KE1smnskF3JYWaH7J6ejSdXG7cslYx0BikDO563EERZ2h_0kCwLAk6LZ6i-4C1gK0ztBLPEoklTg9xCS3ixlZE-zWubwDTaI69iRkmHrQm8Js989Ya8HN48RFQN_5b8vn5sV6QIbuwgz6SIOA1D9JtZVDWF5JUOkXmImQrLaFe3i4q1tBh02pDlgAbpZUM4XdNFRSfYKFiB-dIRmNGNpwV-3zsyG51dF-cskiwwxyE1YlZ4IR0cxVyE1AopETFy4PrCw90wL42UwQoTEuM9xybeLNhMIapY4KXPjei_J51qWfl9QhOROBVKbp0reWq4SkvvVe5d4JIblXfJ57VM9V2LpaHhDoIq0E9UoBOlUQVdsg9y1wbkVevZNMM31kSB00lllxxvKWOzXJZggokTDtfa0fFQ1npjQl1y0ijsf3ahi2mRFVe_JtPiAsdxB0od_HP9j-Q5GKf-eTH-cUhetBUmWCL5gXRWD3_8EaQxK3scDfQv-tvslA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theoretical+Expected+Genetic+Gains+for+Among%E2%80%90and%E2%80%90Within%E2%80%90Family+Selection+Methods+in+Perennial+Forage+Crops&rft.jtitle=Crop+science&rft.au=Casler%2C+Michael+D.&rft.au=Brummer%2C+E.+Charles&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.pub=Crop+Science+Society+of+America&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=890&rft.epage=902&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135%2Fcropsci2007.09.0499&rft.externalDBID=10.2135%252Fcropsci2007.09.0499&rft.externalDocID=CSC2CROPSCI2007090499
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0011-183X&client=summon