Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes

• Published in: BMC oral health Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 464
• Main Authors: Wan, Wen-Dong, Lu, Can, yuan, Yong-Xiang, Hu, Jia-Ju, Liang, Jie, He, Cai-Yun, Huang, Yu-Qi, Su, Tong, Guo, Feng, Jiang, Can-Hua, Li, Ning
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 03.11.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aesthetic outcome; Aesthetics; Buccal cancer; Combined radical resection; Dissection; Hockey; Neck dissection; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Robots; Scars; Squamous cell carcinoma; Surgery; Surgical approach; China
• ISSN: 1472-6831; 1472-6831
• DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. Methods This single-center study retrospectively reviewed 80 patients with BSCC, of which 37 underwent the lateral approach and 43 underwent the conventional approach. Surgical, functional, oncological, and aesthetic evaluations, as well as follow-ups, were recorded and compared. Results Compared to the conventional approach group, the lateral approach group had a longer surgical time ( P  = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in other surgical and oncological parameters. Moreover, the scar in the head and neck had a significantly discreet appearance in the lateral approach group, whose satisfaction was better than those in the conventional approach group ( P  = 0.000). Other oral function parameters, postoperative mouth-opening, and 3-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The lateral approach could provide superior aesthetic results while maintaining equal surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes compared to the conventional approach for radical resection of BSCC.