New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools

• Published in: eLife Vol. 10
• Main Authors: Klump, Barbara C, St Clair, James JH, Rutz, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England eLife Science Publications, Ltd 21.12.2021; eLife Sciences Publications Ltd; eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animals; Birds; Corvus moneduloides; Crows; Crows (Birds); Ecology; Experiments; extractive foraging; Female; Flowers & plants; Foraging behavior; Leaf litter; Male; optimal foraging; Population studies; Raw materials; tool manufacture; tool use; Tool Use Behavior; utility; Canada; New Caledonia; ecology; extractive foraging; tool use; tool manufacture; utility; optimal foraging; Corvus moneduloides
• ISSN: 2050-084X; 2050-084X
• DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64829

The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild-caught, temporarily captive New Caledonian crows, we investigated experimentally whether individuals prefer one tool type over the other when given a choice and whether they take better care of their preferred tools between successive episodes of use, safely storing them underfoot or in nearby holes. Crows strongly preferred hooked stick tools made from Desmanthus virgatus stems over non-hooked stick tools. Importantly, this preference was also reflected in subsequent tool-handling behaviour, with subjects keeping hooked stick tools safe more often than non-hooked stick tools sourced from leaf litter. These results suggest that crows ‘value’ hooked stick tools, which are both costlier to procure and more efficient to use, more than non-hooked stick tools. Results from a series of control treatments suggested that crows altered their tool ‘safekeeping’ behaviour in response to a combination of factors, including tool type and raw material. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use safekeeping behaviour as a proxy for assessing how non-human animals value different tool types, establishing a novel paradigm for productive cross-taxonomic comparisons.