No Consistent Evidence for Microbiota in Murine Placental and Fetal Tissues
The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized in utero by microorganisms from microbial communities that...
Saved in:
| Published in | mSphere Vol. 5; no. 1 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
American Society for Microbiology
26.02.2020
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2379-5042 2379-5042 |
| DOI | 10.1128/mSphere.00933-19 |
Cover
| Abstract | The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized
in utero
by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the
in utero
colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the
in utero
colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing.
The existence of a placental microbiota and
in utero
colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate,
Staphylococcus hominis
, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (
n
= 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice.
IMPORTANCE
The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized
in utero
by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the
in utero
colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the
in utero
colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized
in utero
by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the
in utero
colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the
in utero
colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing.
The existence of a placental microbiota and
in utero
colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate,
Staphylococcus hominis
, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (
n
= 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice.
IMPORTANCE
The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized
in utero
by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the
in utero
colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the
in utero
colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. ABSTRACTThe existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, Staphylococcus hominis, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (n = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice.IMPORTANCE The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized in utero by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the in utero colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the in utero colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. ABSTRACT The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, Staphylococcus hominis, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (n = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice. IMPORTANCE The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized in utero by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the in utero colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the in utero colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, Staphylococcus hominis, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (n = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice.IMPORTANCE The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized in utero by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the in utero colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the in utero colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing.The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, Staphylococcus hominis, a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples (n = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice.IMPORTANCE The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized in utero by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the in utero colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the in utero colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. The existence of a placental microbiota and colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, , a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples ( = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice. The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing. |
| Author | Winters, Andrew D. Galaz, Jose Arenas-Hernandez, Marcia Garcia-Flores, Valeria Gomez-Lopez, Nardhy Greenberg, Jonathan M. Motomura, Kenichiro Theis, Kevin R. Ahmad, Madison M. Romero, Roberto |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kevin R. orcidid: 0000-0002-8690-7599 surname: Theis fullname: Theis, Kevin R. organization: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Roberto orcidid: 0000-0002-4448-5121 surname: Romero fullname: Romero, Roberto organization: Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Jonathan M. surname: Greenberg fullname: Greenberg, Jonathan M. organization: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Andrew D. surname: Winters fullname: Winters, Andrew D. organization: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Valeria surname: Garcia-Flores fullname: Garcia-Flores, Valeria organization: Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: Kenichiro surname: Motomura fullname: Motomura, Kenichiro organization: Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: Madison M. surname: Ahmad fullname: Ahmad, Madison M. organization: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: Jose surname: Galaz fullname: Galaz, Jose organization: Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile – sequence: 9 givenname: Marcia surname: Arenas-Hernandez fullname: Arenas-Hernandez, Marcia organization: Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA – sequence: 10 givenname: Nardhy orcidid: 0000-0002-3406-5262 surname: Gomez-Lopez fullname: Gomez-Lopez, Nardhy organization: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kk1r3DAQhkVJaT6ae0_F0Esum-rLsnUplCVJQ5O20PQsxtI40eKVtpId6L-vnN2UJFAQaJCeeeeVZg7JXogBCXnH6CljvP24_rm5w4SnlGohFky_IgdcNHpRU8n3nsT75DjnFaWUKa5Uo96QfcEZ5VrKA_L1W6yWMWSfRwxjdXbvHQaLVR9Tde1tip2PI1Q-VNdT8gGrHwPYQsJQQXDVOc7Rjc95wvyWvO5hyHi824_Ir_Ozm-WXxdX3i8vl56uFlZqOC1ecKcV5Dy3SVgFQBEDaS-5E3fNegdC0c85yq4RrGBcCWVOqNgCdbJw4IpdbXRdhZTbJryH9MRG8eTiI6dZAGr0d0LTa6VrUVjBbS8t5xyko29aCU44ou6L1aau1mbo1uvlpCYZnos9vgr8zt_HeNFTWQrMicLITSPF3-YTRrH22OAwQME7ZcKGUkoK3uqAfXqCrOKVQvqpQrWwbVVah3j919M_KY88KoLZA6U7OCXtj_Qijj7NBPxhGzTwfZjcf5mE-DJvr0xeJj9r_TfkLYnm-qQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2020_544460 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10020_023_00689_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgwh_2022_810673 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbj_2022_03_017 crossref_primary_10_17816_2072_2354_2020_20_3_7_14 crossref_primary_10_3390_d13110527 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20021463 crossref_primary_10_1080_1040841X_2021_1999903 crossref_primary_10_1128_IAI_00151_21 crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_200013 crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2021_1884514 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1213234 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14223337 crossref_primary_10_55531_2072_2354_2023_23_1_4_9 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_14875 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2024_105793 crossref_primary_10_1128_IAI_00819_20 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41390_020_01121_x crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_182543 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2020_00413 crossref_primary_10_3390_vetsci10050331 crossref_primary_10_1172_jci_insight_138751 crossref_primary_10_1128_IAI_00157_21 crossref_primary_10_1128_mSphere_00210_20 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13073_021_01005_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1050352 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2022_820366 crossref_primary_10_4049_jimmunol_2100955 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_27745_z crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12833 crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2021_0191 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_01286_22 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1096262 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1038/pr.2016.155 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009864 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.380 10.1159/000339182 10.1038/s41598-019-46173-0 10.1038/s41598-017-03066-4 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2 10.1093/nar/gks1219 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.917 10.1093/nar/gkm864 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.526 10.3390/nu7085315 10.1038/s41598-017-11514-4 10.1186/s40168-018-0575-4 10.1038/s41586-019-1451-5 10.1371/journal.pone.0097214 10.18632/oncotarget.19319 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.964 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.524 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.036 10.1128/AEM.02272-07 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.029 10.1371/journal.pone.0197439 10.1186/s40168-018-0529-x 10.1126/science.aad2571 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.12.007 10.1111/1471-0528.15896 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.041 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01124 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.193 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.003 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.543 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02475.x 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.10.007 10.1177/1933719118804411 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4748-4755.2004 10.1172/jci.insight.127806 10.1128/AEM.00483-18 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.018 10.1186/s40168-016-0172-3 10.1111/1471-0528.15974 10.1371/journal.pone.0180167 10.1038/srep23129 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.028 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 10.3390/ijms20143405 10.1038/s41564-018-0202-y 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.914 10.7717/peerj.2584 10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1004 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1093 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. 2020 Theis et al. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. – notice: Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. 2020 Theis et al. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1128/mSphere.00933-19 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Murine Placental and Fetal Tissues Lack Microbiota |
| EISSN | 2379-5042 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_89d9535c31c54c22b20a6c853202ee4b PMC7045391 32102944 10_1128_mSphere_00933_19 |
| Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: HHSN275201300006C – fundername: ; grantid: HHSN275201300006C |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 53G 5VS 7X7 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAGFI AAUOK AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION DIK EBS FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE KQ8 LK8 M48 M7P M~E O9- OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC R9- RHI RPM RSF UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PQGLB 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-d2376622fa8e086aa0eaae0f42d35f2f6a390bddc2c63d71233e17ace7aab47d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISSN | 2379-5042 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:24:36 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:27:46 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 08:31:04 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:42:31 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:16:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:34 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | in utero colonization low-microbial-biomass sample mouse model microbiome pregnancy |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2020 Theis et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-d2376622fa8e086aa0eaae0f42d35f2f6a390bddc2c63d71233e17ace7aab47d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Citation Theis KR, Romero R, Greenberg JM, Winters AD, Garcia-Flores V, Motomura K, Ahmad MM, Galaz J, Arenas-Hernandez M, Gomez-Lopez N. 2020. No consistent evidence for microbiota in murine placental and fetal tissues. mSphere 5:e00933-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00933-19. |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3406-5262 0000-0002-4448-5121 0000-0002-8690-7599 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384876876?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 32102944 |
| PQID | 2384876876 |
| PQPubID | 2045592 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_89d9535c31c54c22b20a6c853202ee4b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7045391 proquest_miscellaneous_2366643289 proquest_journals_2384876876 pubmed_primary_32102944 crossref_citationtrail_10_1128_mSphere_00933_19 crossref_primary_10_1128_mSphere_00933_19 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20200226 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-02-26 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 2 year: 2020 text: 20200226 day: 26 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Washington – name: 1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC |
| PublicationTitle | mSphere |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | mSphere |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Society for Microbiology |
| References | e_1_3_2_26_2 e_1_3_2_49_2 e_1_3_2_28_2 e_1_3_2_41_2 e_1_3_2_20_2 e_1_3_2_43_2 e_1_3_2_22_2 e_1_3_2_45_2 e_1_3_2_24_2 e_1_3_2_47_2 e_1_3_2_9_2 e_1_3_2_16_2 e_1_3_2_37_2 e_1_3_2_7_2 e_1_3_2_18_2 e_1_3_2_39_2 Gallup J (e_1_3_2_52_2) 2001 e_1_3_2_54_2 Hammer O (e_1_3_2_59_2) 2001; 4 e_1_3_2_10_2 e_1_3_2_31_2 e_1_3_2_5_2 e_1_3_2_12_2 e_1_3_2_33_2 e_1_3_2_58_2 e_1_3_2_3_2 e_1_3_2_14_2 e_1_3_2_35_2 e_1_3_2_56_2 e_1_3_2_50_2 e_1_3_2_27_2 e_1_3_2_48_2 e_1_3_2_29_2 e_1_3_2_40_2 e_1_3_2_21_2 e_1_3_2_42_2 e_1_3_2_23_2 e_1_3_2_44_2 e_1_3_2_25_2 e_1_3_2_46_2 e_1_3_2_15_2 e_1_3_2_38_2 e_1_3_2_8_2 e_1_3_2_17_2 e_1_3_2_6_2 e_1_3_2_19_2 e_1_3_2_30_2 e_1_3_2_53_2 e_1_3_2_32_2 e_1_3_2_51_2 e_1_3_2_11_2 e_1_3_2_34_2 e_1_3_2_57_2 e_1_3_2_4_2 e_1_3_2_13_2 e_1_3_2_36_2 e_1_3_2_55_2 e_1_3_2_2_2 |
| References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_2_6_2 doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.155 – ident: e_1_3_2_37_2 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009864 – ident: e_1_3_2_45_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.380 – ident: e_1_3_2_40_2 doi: 10.1159/000339182 – ident: e_1_3_2_53_2 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46173-0 – ident: e_1_3_2_11_2 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03066-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_58_2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2 – ident: e_1_3_2_56_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 – ident: e_1_3_2_48_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 – ident: e_1_3_2_32_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.917 – ident: e_1_3_2_55_2 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864 – ident: e_1_3_2_44_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.526 – ident: e_1_3_2_5_2 doi: 10.3390/nu7085315 – ident: e_1_3_2_12_2 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11514-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0575-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_18_2 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1451-5 – ident: e_1_3_2_50_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097214 – ident: e_1_3_2_13_2 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19319 – ident: e_1_3_2_35_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018 – ident: e_1_3_2_20_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.964 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.524 – ident: e_1_3_2_21_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.036 – ident: e_1_3_2_51_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07 – ident: e_1_3_2_28_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.029 – ident: e_1_3_2_41_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197439 – ident: e_1_3_2_14_2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0529-x – ident: e_1_3_2_38_2 doi: 10.1126/science.aad2571 – ident: e_1_3_2_36_2 doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.12.007 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_2 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15896 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_2 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.041 – ident: e_1_3_2_31_2 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01124 – ident: e_1_3_2_9_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.193 – ident: e_1_3_2_24_2 doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.003 – ident: e_1_3_2_46_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.543 – ident: e_1_3_2_49_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 – ident: e_1_3_2_39_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02475.x – ident: e_1_3_2_3_2 doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.10.007 – ident: e_1_3_2_34_2 doi: 10.1177/1933719118804411 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2001 ident: e_1_3_2_59_2 article-title: PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis publication-title: Palaeontol Electron – ident: e_1_3_2_47_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4748-4755.2004 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_2 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.127806 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00483-18 – ident: e_1_3_2_22_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.018 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0172-3 – ident: e_1_3_2_29_2 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15974 – ident: e_1_3_2_10_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180167 – ident: e_1_3_2_7_2 doi: 10.1038/srep23129 – ident: e_1_3_2_33_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.028 – ident: e_1_3_2_54_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 – ident: e_1_3_2_30_2 doi: 10.3390/ijms20143405 – start-page: 1 volume-title: PCR troubleshooting and optimization: the essential guide year: 2001 ident: e_1_3_2_52_2 – ident: e_1_3_2_26_2 doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0202-y – ident: e_1_3_2_43_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.914 – ident: e_1_3_2_57_2 doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584 – ident: e_1_3_2_25_2 doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_42_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1004 – ident: e_1_3_2_27_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1093 |
| SSID | ssj0001626676 |
| Score | 2.3215408 |
| Snippet | The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery... The existence of a placental microbiota and colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine... ABSTRACTThe existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was... The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to... ABSTRACT The existence of a placental microbiota and in utero colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| SubjectTerms | Animals Bacteria Bacteria - classification Bacteria - isolation & purification Cervix Colonization Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA sequencing DNA, Bacterial - genetics Female Fetus - microbiology Fetuses Host-Microbe Biology Immune system in utero colonization Intestine Liver low-microbial-biomass sample Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL microbiome Microbiota Microbiota - genetics Microorganisms Microscopy mouse model Mouth - microbiology Obstetrics Ontogeny Placenta Placenta - microbiology Pregnancy Pregnancy complications Premature birth RNA, Ribosomal, 16S rRNA 16S Sequence Analysis, DNA Skin Studies Taxonomy Uterus Vagina Vagina - microbiology |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yIHgRv62uEsGLh_rSSZqPo4qPRdlFcBf2FtIkxQfaJ2734H_vTNpX3hPRi9BDaRKazkya3ySZ3zD2sk8q9sGKGoKDWrmga2t1qK3KPbhORtmXU75n-uRCfbhsL_dSfdGZsIkeeBLcyrrkWtlG2cRWRYAORNDRUj4DyFl19PcVTuw5U2V1BXG6Nsu-JNjVt88Upp9fFxe-JmKdvXmo0PX_CWP-flRyb-5Z32G3Z9DI30ydvctu5OEeuzmlkfx5n3082_KSeBM1Nox8lyiUIx7lp5uJaWkMfDPwU1pbz_wTrZ1TGCQPQ-LrTHfnRQNXD9jF-v35u5N6TpJQR-XEWCc61qIBUOAZ3ZMQRA4hi15Bkm0PvQ7SiS6lCFHLZHCikrkx-BYTQqdMkg_Z0bAd8mPGg7LZNtL0ptOqExbbIThCRCGSAcRRFVvtRObjzCBOiSy--uJJgPWzkH0Rsm9cxV4tLb5P7Bl_qfuWtLDUI97r8gCtwc_W4P9lDRU73unQz4PxyiMqQbdM41WxF0sxDiPaGwlD3l5THfTjlET3s2KPJpUvPaEwJ3BKVcwcGMNBVw9Lhs2XQtVtEDFL1zz5H9_2lN0CcvYpnl4fs6Pxx3V-hoho7J4X4_8F_QEJSg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3faxQxEA6lUuiLVG11aysRfPFh290kmx8PIlY8inJFaA_6FrJJVg_qnl63YP97Z7J7qydHYR-WTcIOMwnzfUlmhpA3TRC-cbrImTMsF8bJXGvpci1iw0zNPW_SLd8LeT4Tn6-r67_h0YMCbzdSO6wnNVvenPz-df8eFvy7PgBGn_64xAj8eJLYeY45QB-BX5JIxaYD2E87LoDdpRrPKjcMXPNNKYX_Jtz5__XJf_zRZI88HoAk_dBb_gnZiu1TstOXlrx_Rr5cLGgqxglWbDu6Kh5KAaPS6bzPvtQ5Om_pFPfbI_2K--kYGkldG-gk4ttVssrtPplNPl19PM-Hwgm5F6bo8oBXXSRjYIQIlMW5IjoXi0awwKuGNdJxU9QheOYlDwqcF4-lgr8o52qhAj8g2-2ijS8IdUJHXXLVqFqKutAwDgAToIwiKAbYKiOnK5VZP2QVx-IWNzaxC6btoGSblGxLk5G344iffUaNB_qeoRXGfpgLO31YLL_ZYWlZbYKpeOV56SvhGatZ4aTXWPGCxSjqjBytbGhX88sCUgGqJuHJyOuxGZYWnpe4Ni7usA9wO8GBkmbkeW_yURIMfWJGiIyotcmwJup6Szv_ntJ3K0DR3JSHD4v1kuwypPYYPS-PyHa3vIvHgH-6-lWa1n8A3yQFlA priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
| Title | No Consistent Evidence for Microbiota in Murine Placental and Fetal Tissues |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102944 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384876876 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2366643289 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7045391 https://doaj.org/article/89d9535c31c54c22b20a6c853202ee4b |
| Volume | 5 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9wwDDdby2AvY91X03WHB3vZQ3aJ7fjjaayjR9m4o2wt3FtwbGc76JK2lz7sv5_k5NJeGYUQQuwQI8nWT7IsEfKh9sLVVmcps4alwliZai1tqkWomam443WM8l3Ik3PxbVksB4fbegir3KyJcaH2rUMf-RRUC2BrCdfny6sUq0bh7upQQuMx2Y2py0Ce1VLd-lgArUs17k4yPf3zEw_rh0_RkE8xvc4dbRST9v8Pad4PmLyjgWbPybMBOtIvPa_3yKPQvCBP-mKSf1-S74uWxvKbwLemo5tyoRRQKZ2v-nxLnaWrhs7Rwx7oKXrQ8TAktY2ns4BPZ5EP61fkfHZ89vUkHUolpE6YrEs9BrdIxoDsAYwUa7NgbchqwTwvalZLy01Wee-Yk9wrUFc85Ar-oqythPL8Ndlp2ibsE2qFDjrnqlaVFFWm4TuASIArMq8YoKmETDckK92QRxzLWVyU0Z5guhyIXEYil7lJyMfxi8s-h8YDfY-QC2M_zH4dX7TXv8phMpXaeFPwwvHcFcIxVrHMSqexxgULQVQJOdzwsBym5Lq8FaCEvB-bYTLhDoltQnuDfcCaExyM0IS86Vk-jgQPOzEjRELUljBsDXW7pVn9jgm7FeBmbvKDh4f1ljxlaMzjeXl5SHa665vwDhBPV02iWE_I7tHx4vTHJPoN4D4X-h9qXQUT |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwED-NTgheEN8EBhgJHngITW3HcR4QYrCqo2s1QSftLTi2s1WCZKyd0P4p_kbu8tGtCO1tUh6i2I4s39n-3dl3P4DXhZO2MDoKuUl5KFOjQq2VCbX0BU9zYUVR3_KdqtGB_HIYH27Any4Whq5VdmtivVC7ypKPvI9bC2Jrhc-Hk18hsUbR6WpHodGoxdif_0aTbfF-9zPK9w3nw53Zp1HYsgqEVqbRMnR0D0Rxjj30iOeNibwxPiokdyIueKGMSKPcOcutEi7BlV34QWKsT4zJZeIE_vcGbEqKaO3B5vbOdP_rhVcH7QOVrM5Due7__EbpAfy72nUQUkKfS_tfTRPwP2z77xXNS3ve8C7cacEq-9ho1z3Y8OV9uNnQV54_gPG0YjXhJ2pKuWQdQSlDHMwm8ybD09Kweckm5NP3bJ989hR-yUzp2NDT26yW_OIhHFzLMD6CXlmV_gkwI7XXA5EUSa5kHmlsh6AMkUzkEo74LYB-N2SZbTOXE4HGj6y2YLjO2kHO6kHOBmkAb1ctTpqsHVfU3SYprOpRvu36Q3V6lLXTN9OpS2MRWzGwsbSc5zwyympi1eDeyzyArU6GWbsILLILlQ3g1aoYpy-dyZjSV2dUB-1HKdDsDeBxI_JVTyi8iqdSBpCsKcNaV9dLyvlxnSI8QaQu0sHTq7v1Em6NZpO9bG93On4Gtzm5EihaX21Bb3l65p8j3lrmL1olZ_D9uufVX86TQWc |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrUBcEG8CBYwEBw5hE9uxnQNClHbVsnS1glbqLTi2064ESemmQv1r_DrGebWLUG-VcohiOxrZY_ub8Xg-gNeF5abQKgqpTmnIUy1CpYQOFXcFTXNmWNFE-c7EzgH_fJgcrsGf_i6MD6vs18RmobaV8T7yMW4tiK0FPuOiC4uYb00-nPwKPYOUP2nt6TRaFZm6899ovi3f727hWL-hdLK9_2kn7BgGQsPTqA6tjwkRlKK0DrG91pHT2kUFp5YlBS2EZmmUW2uoEcxKXOWZi6U2Tmqdc2kZ_vcGrEvcFfkI1je3Z_OvFx4etBWEHM5GqRr__OZTBbh3jRsh9Ml9Lu2FDWXA_3Duv-Gal_a_yV240wFX8rHVtHuw5sr7cLOlsjx_ANNZRRryT9SasiY9WSlBTEz2Fm22p1qTRUn2vH_fkbn33_urmESXlkycf9tvtGD5EA6upRsfwaisSvcEiObKqZjJQuaC55HCdgjQENVEVlLEcgGM-y7LTJfF3JNp_Mgaa4aqrOvkrOnkLE4DeDu0OGkzeFxRd9OPwlDP595uPlSnR1k3lTOV2jRhiWGxSbihNKeRFkZ5hg3qHM8D2OjHMOsWhGV2ob4BvBqKcSr78xlduurM10FbkjM0gQN43A75IIm_akVTzgOQK8qwIupqSbk4btKFS0TtLI2fXi3WS7iF8yn7sjubPoPb1HsV_MV9sQGj-vTMPUfoVecvOh0n8P26p9VfaBBFkw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No+Consistent+Evidence+for+Microbiota+in+Murine+Placental+and+Fetal+Tissues&rft.jtitle=mSphere&rft.au=Theis%2C+Kevin+R&rft.au=Romero%2C+Roberto&rft.au=Greenberg%2C+Jonathan+M&rft.au=Winters%2C+Andrew+D&rft.date=2020-02-26&rft.pub=American+Society+for+Microbiology&rft.eissn=2379-5042&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128%2FmSphere.00933-19&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2379-5042&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2379-5042&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2379-5042&client=summon |