Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on over...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 200; no. 5; pp. 564.e1 - 564.e5 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Mosby, Inc
01.05.2009
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS.
After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (≤ 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student
t test, χ
2 test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression.
Of 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%;
P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%;
P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%;
P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 ± 89 months vs 43 ± 71 months;
P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%;
P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2).
Based on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS.OBJECTIVELower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS.After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (< or = 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student t test, chi(2) test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression.STUDY DESIGNAfter institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (< or = 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student t test, chi(2) test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression.Of 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%; P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%; P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%; P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 +/- 89 months vs 43 +/- 71 months; P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%; P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2).RESULTSOf 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%; P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%; P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%; P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 +/- 89 months vs 43 +/- 71 months; P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%; P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2).Based on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low.CONCLUSIONBased on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low. Objective Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS. Study Design After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (≤ 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student t test, χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%; P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%; P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%; P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 ± 89 months vs 43 ± 71 months; P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%; P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2). Conclusion Based on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (< or = 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student t test, chi(2) test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. Of 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%; P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%; P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%; P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 +/- 89 months vs 43 +/- 71 months; P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%; P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2). Based on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of time from sling placement to midline sling lysis on overall improvement in LUTS. After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 112 subjects undergoing midline sling lysis from January 1997-September 2007. The inclusion criteria were women with a vaginal midline sling lysis for LUTS after a prior pubovaginal or midurethral sling. We excluded any subject with sling erosion without LUTS and those who underwent a repeated sling at the time of lysis. We compared subjects who had an early sling lysis (≤ 1 year from sling to lysis) to a late sling lysis (> 1 year). The primary outcome was based on the subject's report of overall improvement in symptoms. We abstracted data on demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, date of antiincontinence procedure, date of midline sling lysis, and postoperative symptoms. Statistical analysis consisted of Student t test, χ 2 test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. Of 112 subjects, 74 (66%) had an early sling lysis and 38 (34%) had a late sling lysis. These 2 groups were similar in age, menopausal status, presence of preoperative LUTS, anterior colporrhaphy at the time of lysis, and presence of an eroded sling. The early lysis group had a higher percentage of midurethral slings (36% vs 8%; P = .001), a lower rate of preoperative complete retention (70% vs 89%; P = .001), and a lower rate of prior urethrolysis (16% vs 45%; P = .003). No significant difference in follow-up time was found between early lysis compared with late lysis (49 ± 89 months vs 43 ± 71 months; P = .73). Ten (8.9%) subjects developed recurrent stress urinary incontinence after sling lysis, which was independent of time to lysis. In all, 94 (84%) subjects had improvement in their LUTS after midline sling lysis. Overall improvement occurred more often in the early sling lysis group compared with the late sling lysis group (91% vs 71%; P = .01). This finding retained significance in a multivariate logistic regression model, which included age, prior urethrolysis, preoperative complete retention, and type of sling (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.2). Based on this large cohort, patients may benefit from earlier midline sling lysis within 1 year for LUTS after a pubovaginal or midurethral sling procedure. The development of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midline sling lysis is relatively low. |
Author | Weidner, Alison C. Roelands, Jennifer J. Webster, George D. Wu, Jennifer M. Amundsen, Cindy L. South, Mary M.T. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mary M.T. surname: South fullname: South, Mary M.T. organization: Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC – sequence: 2 givenname: Jennifer M. surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Jennifer M. organization: Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC – sequence: 3 givenname: George D. surname: Webster fullname: Webster, George D. organization: Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC – sequence: 4 givenname: Alison C. surname: Weidner fullname: Weidner, Alison C. organization: Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC – sequence: 5 givenname: Jennifer J. surname: Roelands fullname: Roelands, Jennifer J. organization: Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC – sequence: 6 givenname: Cindy L. surname: Amundsen fullname: Amundsen, Cindy L. organization: Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21369956$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19249728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1URLeFP8AB-QK3BNvJJjFCSKgqH1IlDsDZuPZk5eA4i8dZlH-Po116qES5-EvPO56Zdy7IWZgCEPKcs5Iz3rweSj1Mu1Iw1pWcl4x3j8iGM9kWTdd0Z2TDGBOFrNrunFwgDutVSPGEnHMpatmKbkN-XOvoF3pA6nUCOjrrXQCKed1Rv6BDGgFnn5C6QHcRMhWpG_dxOsAIIa3PfvqdH-fogo4LTVGbRHEZ92ka8Sl53GuP8Oy0X5LvH66_XX0qbr58_Hz1_qYwtWSpkE3d5pMVZltL3ltegxam4nVfa8ttz0xjqwYay5isZC9bdgu9zWVuK6i7ra0uyatj3JzZrxkwqdGhAe91gGlG1bS8ZjleBl-cwPl2BKv20Y05bfW3Jxl4eQI0Gu37qINxeMcJXjVSbpvMdUfOxAkxQq-MSzq5KeQOOK84U6tNalCrTWq1SXGusk1ZKu5J77J4SPT2KILcxoODqNA4CAasi2CSspN7WP7untxkk12u8CcsgMM0x5ANUlyhUEx9XadlnR3W5ampWpYDvPl3gP_9_geq6NSn |
CODEN | AJOGAH |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2012_08_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_012_0150_y crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2019_1626230 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_010_0136_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13020637 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_017_3509_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_012_1920_y crossref_primary_10_1586_17434440_2015_985655 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_010_1186_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_SPV_0000000000001292 crossref_primary_10_4103_UROS_UROS_21_18 crossref_primary_10_1097_SPV_0000000000000242 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_22927 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contre_2023_100034 crossref_primary_10_1097_SPV_0000000000001165 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_021_04705_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_02_3341 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_013_0186_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2013_09_030 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0b013e32833bd73a crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2012_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_017_3302_y crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004646 crossref_primary_10_1111_luts_12111 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_25387 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_009_0023_1 crossref_primary_10_18621_eurj_287838 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0084_4071_10_79448_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2011_09_025 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0b013e3283476eb5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2017_08_041 crossref_primary_10_1097_SPV_0000000000000338 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_10_019 crossref_primary_10_1097_GCO_0b013e32833d582e |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00072-6 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.004 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc32 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61655-0 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.029 10.1007/s001920070021 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00569-7 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38980-2 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62095-0 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.023 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.029 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69096-7 10.1007/s11934-006-0008-y 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65054-7 10.1007/s00192-006-0208-5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63554-7 10.1097/01.ju.0000138555.70421.ca 10.1007/s00192-006-0188-5 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67378-8 10.1007/s11934-005-0055-9 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01559-X 10.1007/s00192-006-0176-9 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35805-6 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32825-2 10.1007/s00192-003-1114-8 10.1097/01.ju.0000042452.65641.05 10.1097/00006254-200207000-00024 |
ContentType | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Copyright | 2009 Mosby, Inc. Mosby, Inc. 2009 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 Mosby, Inc. – notice: Mosby, Inc. – notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6868 |
EndPage | 564.e5 |
ExternalDocumentID | 19249728 21369956 10_1016_j_ajog_2008_11_018 S0002937808022370 1_s2_0_S0002937808022370 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -ET .1- .55 .FO .GJ .XZ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~. 1~5 23M 2KS 354 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 85S 8F7 8P~ AAEDT AAEDW AAIKC AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAMNW AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYJJ AAYWO ABBQC ABCQX ABDPE ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABPMR ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFCHL AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGNAY AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHDLI AI. AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 C5W CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM LPU M41 MO0 N4W N9A NEJ NQ- O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OCB OGEVE OHH OHT OMK OQ. OVD P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- ROL RPZ RXW SDF SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TAE TEORI TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UHU UKR UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WH7 WOQ WOW X6Y X7M XFW YFH YOC YYQ YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ZY1 ~G- ~H1 AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW NCXOZ RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ ADOJD AFDAS AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG G8K LCYCR ZA5 AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AGRNS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-9647c49d2c5491fd14ea2c314f4ad1df0c6d36e6d00939f970befd86853e485d3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 00:46:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:48:41 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:27:26 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 16:41:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:55 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:29:24 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:57 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:36:58 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | stress urinary incontinence lower urinary tract symptoms pubovaginal or midurethral sling urethrolysis urinary retention Voiding dysfunction Late Urinary system disease Gynecology Lysis Early Urinary tract disease Obstetrics Lower urinary tract symptoms Comparative study |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-9647c49d2c5491fd14ea2c314f4ad1df0c6d36e6d00939f970befd86853e485d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 19249728 |
PQID | 67140314 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 3 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67140314 pubmed_primary_19249728 pascalfrancis_primary_21369956 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajog_2008_11_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2008_11_018 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2008_11_018 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0002937808022370 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2008_11_018 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2009 text: 2009-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Mosby, Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mosby, Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Anger, Saigal, Stothers, Thom, Rodriguez, Litwin (bib1) 2006; 176 Tennstedt, Fitzgerald, Nager (bib3) 2007; 18 Scarpero, Dmochowski, Nitti (bib25) 2003; 169 Starkman, Scarpero, Dmochowski (bib29) 2006; 7 Hunskaar, Arnold, Burgio, Diokno, Herzog, Mallett (bib2) 2000; 11 Nguyen (bib5) 2002; 57 Amundsen, Guralnick, Webster (bib14) 2000; 164 deTayrac, Therin (bib26) 2007; 18 Sweeney, Leng (bib18) 2005; 6 Goldman, Rackley, Appell (bib23) 1999; 161 Boulanger, Boukerrou, Lambaudie, Defossez, Cosson (bib28) 2006; 125 Austin, Spyropoulos, Lotenfoe, Helal, Hoffman, Lockhart (bib9) 1996; 47 Foster, McGuire (bib7) 1993; 150 Leng, Davies, Tarin, Sweeney, Chancellor (bib15) 2004; 172 Abrams, Cardozo, Fall (bib16) 2003; 61 Petrou, Brown, Blaivas (bib11) 1999; 161 Nitti, Raz (bib8) 1994; 152 McGuire, Letson, Wang (bib6) 1989; 142 Dunn, Bent, Ellerkman, Nihira, Melick (bib21) 2004; 15 Stanford, Paraiso (bib4) 2008; 15 Boukerrou, Boulanger, Rubod, Lambaudie, Dubois, Cosson (bib27) 2007; 134 Carr, Webster (bib20) 1997; 157 McCrery, Appell (bib24) 2007; 18 Siddighi, Karram (bib17) 2007; 19 Rardin, Rosenblatt, Kohli, Miklos, Heit, Lucente (bib19) 2002; 100 Cross, Cespedes, English, McGuire (bib10) 1998; 159 Nitti, Carlson, Blaivas, Dmochowski (bib13) 2002; 59 Petrou, Young (bib12) 2002; 167 Goldman (bib22) 2003; 62 Nguyen (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib5) 2002; 57 Hunskaar (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib2) 2000; 11 Petrou (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib11) 1999; 161 Austin (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib9) 1996; 47 Carr (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib20) 1997; 157 Abrams (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib16) 2003; 61 Nitti (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib8) 1994; 152 Siddighi (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib17) 2007; 19 Amundsen (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib14) 2000; 164 Boukerrou (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib27) 2007; 134 deTayrac (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib26) 2007; 18 Anger (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib1) 2006; 176 McGuire (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib6) 1989; 142 Stanford (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib4) 2008; 15 Boulanger (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib28) 2006; 125 McCrery (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib24) 2007; 18 Goldman (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib23) 1999; 161 Foster (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib7) 1993; 150 Cross (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib10) 1998; 159 Petrou (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib12) 2002; 167 Nitti (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib13) 2002; 59 Tennstedt (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib3) 2007; 18 Dunn (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib21) 2004; 15 Starkman (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib29) 2006; 7 Leng (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib15) 2004; 172 Rardin (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib19) 2002; 100 Scarpero (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib25) 2003; 169 Sweeney (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib18) 2005; 6 Goldman (10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib22) 2003; 62 |
References_xml | – volume: 62 start-page: 714 year: 2003 end-page: 718 ident: bib22 article-title: Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction publication-title: Urology – volume: 134 start-page: 262 year: 2007 end-page: 267 ident: bib27 article-title: Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 161 start-page: 196 year: 1999 end-page: 199 ident: bib23 article-title: The efficacy of urethrolysis without re-suspension for iatrogenic urethral obstruction publication-title: J Urol – volume: 6 start-page: 365 year: 2005 end-page: 370 ident: bib18 article-title: Treatment of postoperative voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery publication-title: Curr Urol Rep – volume: 57 start-page: 468 year: 2002 end-page: 475 ident: bib5 article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of voiding dysfunction caused by urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv – volume: 150 start-page: 1448 year: 1993 end-page: 1451 ident: bib7 article-title: Management of urethral obstruction with transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol – volume: 169 start-page: 1013 year: 2003 end-page: 1016 ident: bib25 article-title: Repeat urethrolysis after failed urethrolysis for iatrogenic obstruction publication-title: J Urol – volume: 47 start-page: 890 year: 1996 end-page: 894 ident: bib9 article-title: Urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery in women: evaluation, methodology, and surgical results publication-title: Urology – volume: 152 start-page: 93 year: 1994 end-page: 98 ident: bib8 article-title: Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol – volume: 167 start-page: 613 year: 2002 end-page: 615 ident: bib12 article-title: Rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after retropubic urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol – volume: 61 start-page: 37 year: 2003 end-page: 49 ident: bib16 article-title: The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization subcommittee of the International Continence Society publication-title: Urology – volume: 176 start-page: 2103 year: 2006 end-page: 2108 ident: bib1 article-title: The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey publication-title: J Urol – volume: 7 start-page: 384 year: 2006 end-page: 394 ident: bib29 article-title: Methods and results of urethrolysis publication-title: Curr Urol Rep – volume: 142 start-page: 1037 year: 1989 end-page: 1039 ident: bib6 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis after obstructive urethral suspension procedures publication-title: J Urol – volume: 11 start-page: 301 year: 2000 end-page: 319 ident: bib2 article-title: Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct – volume: 172 start-page: 1379 year: 2004 end-page: 1381 ident: bib15 article-title: Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction publication-title: J Urol – volume: 59 start-page: 47 year: 2002 end-page: 52 ident: bib13 article-title: Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision publication-title: Urology – volume: 157 start-page: 821 year: 1997 end-page: 823 ident: bib20 article-title: Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol – volume: 15 start-page: 132 year: 2008 end-page: 145 ident: bib4 article-title: A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol – volume: 15 start-page: 25 year: 2004 end-page: 31 ident: bib21 article-title: Voiding dysfunction after surgery for stress incontinence: literature review and survey results publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct – volume: 161 start-page: 1268 year: 1999 end-page: 1271 ident: bib11 article-title: Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol – volume: 100 start-page: 898 year: 2002 end-page: 902 ident: bib19 article-title: Release of tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of refractory postoperative voiding dysfunction publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 18 start-page: 513 year: 2007 end-page: 520 ident: bib26 article-title: Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery: a pilot study publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct – volume: 125 start-page: 103 year: 2006 end-page: 108 ident: bib28 article-title: Tissue integration and tolerance to meshes used in gynecologic surgery: an experimental study publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 159 start-page: 1199 year: 1998 end-page: 1201 ident: bib10 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery publication-title: J Urol – volume: 18 start-page: 543 year: 2007 end-page: 549 ident: bib3 article-title: Quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct – volume: 19 start-page: 490 year: 2007 end-page: 495 ident: bib17 article-title: Surgical and nonsurgical approaches to treat voiding dysfunction following antiincontinence surgery publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol – volume: 164 start-page: 434 year: 2000 end-page: 437 ident: bib14 article-title: Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure publication-title: J Urol – volume: 18 start-page: 627 year: 2007 end-page: 633 ident: bib24 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis for obstruction after antiincontinence surgery publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct – volume: 47 start-page: 890 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib9 article-title: Urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery in women: evaluation, methodology, and surgical results publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00072-6 – volume: 15 start-page: 132 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib4 article-title: A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.004 – volume: 19 start-page: 490 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib17 article-title: Surgical and nonsurgical approaches to treat voiding dysfunction following antiincontinence surgery publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc32 – volume: 161 start-page: 1268 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib11 article-title: Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61655-0 – volume: 125 start-page: 103 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib28 article-title: Tissue integration and tolerance to meshes used in gynecologic surgery: an experimental study publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.029 – volume: 11 start-page: 301 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib2 article-title: Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s001920070021 – volume: 61 start-page: 37 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib16 article-title: The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization subcommittee of the International Continence Society publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4 – volume: 62 start-page: 714 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib22 article-title: Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00569-7 – volume: 142 start-page: 1037 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib6 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis after obstructive urethral suspension procedures publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38980-2 – volume: 161 start-page: 196 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib23 article-title: The efficacy of urethrolysis without re-suspension for iatrogenic urethral obstruction publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62095-0 – volume: 134 start-page: 262 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib27 article-title: Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.023 – volume: 176 start-page: 2103 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib1 article-title: The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.029 – volume: 167 start-page: 613 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib12 article-title: Rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after retropubic urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69096-7 – volume: 7 start-page: 384 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib29 article-title: Methods and results of urethrolysis publication-title: Curr Urol Rep doi: 10.1007/s11934-006-0008-y – volume: 157 start-page: 821 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib20 article-title: Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65054-7 – volume: 18 start-page: 627 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib24 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis for obstruction after antiincontinence surgery publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0208-5 – volume: 159 start-page: 1199 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib10 article-title: Transvaginal urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63554-7 – volume: 172 start-page: 1379 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib15 article-title: Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000138555.70421.ca – volume: 18 start-page: 543 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib3 article-title: Quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0188-5 – volume: 164 start-page: 434 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib14 article-title: Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67378-8 – volume: 6 start-page: 365 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib18 article-title: Treatment of postoperative voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery publication-title: Curr Urol Rep doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0055-9 – volume: 59 start-page: 47 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib13 article-title: Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01559-X – volume: 18 start-page: 513 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib26 article-title: Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery: a pilot study publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0176-9 – volume: 150 start-page: 1448 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib7 article-title: Management of urethral obstruction with transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35805-6 – volume: 152 start-page: 93 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib8 article-title: Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32825-2 – volume: 15 start-page: 25 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib21 article-title: Voiding dysfunction after surgery for stress incontinence: literature review and survey results publication-title: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1114-8 – volume: 169 start-page: 1013 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib25 article-title: Repeat urethrolysis after failed urethrolysis for iatrogenic obstruction publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000042452.65641.05 – volume: 57 start-page: 468 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib5 article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of voiding dysfunction caused by urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv doi: 10.1097/00006254-200207000-00024 – volume: 100 start-page: 898 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018_bib19 article-title: Release of tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of refractory postoperative voiding dysfunction publication-title: Obstet Gynecol |
SSID | ssj0002292 |
Score | 2.1349049 |
Snippet | Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or storage, voiding,... Objective Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) occur in 5-20% of women after antiincontinence procedures. Symptoms include complete urinary retention or... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 564.e1 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Cohort Studies Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans lower urinary tract symptoms Medical sciences Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Obstetrics and Gynecology Postoperative Complications - physiopathology pubovaginal or midurethral sling urethrolysis Recovery of Function Recurrence Retrospective Studies stress urinary incontinence Suburethral Slings Urethra - surgery Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery urinary retention Urinary Retention - physiopathology Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous Urinary tract. Prostate gland Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods Vagina - surgery |
Title | Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0002937808022370 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0002937808022370 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19249728 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67140314 |
Volume | 200 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZpAqVQSvpK3SZbHXorbqyHJfsYQsO2JTk1kJsqS_LisOtd1t5CLv3t1VjyltA0hdyM8GBZGs18M5oHQh88KLaCSpFqy3nKC5OnBYWWgDzjVpvcaAuugfMLMb3kX6_yqx10OubCQFhllP1Bpg_SOo4cx9U8XjUN5PhmXlfJYsgWZdLb7XuUlcKz9t7Jl2_Ti61AprSkIwoGgpg7E8K89PVyFkIqoZgn9P64Wz89XenOr1od2l38G48OeulsHz2LgBKfhDk_RzuufYEen8cr85fox1DCGP_s8NzDSrxoLABLDPByhod6JNhb3Jt53-GmxTPAkG6Nm8HXMLgOYXgOvdQwOOb1-gb3kFmFu5vFql8uulfo8uzz99NpGtsqpIaXWZ9C7ql_stR425DUlnCnqWGE11xbYuvMCMuEExa8HWVdyqxytS2EV-yOF7llr9Fuu2zdG4SlrIRxoiS5sbwqi8pLS2sN09xKZrlOEBkXU5lYcxxaX8zVGFx2rWADQjNMb4r4DUjQxy3NKlTcuPdtNu6RGnNJvfRTXiHcSyXvonJdPMCdIqqjKlN_MVmC8i3lLT797xcntxho-2uUMAHZxQl6P3KU8iccrm1065abTomhpiLhCToIjPZnWcB4lrR4-8BJvUNPwuUYxG8eot1-vXFHHmP11QQ9-vSLTOJJ-g0brCX1 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhhbZQSt91H4kOvRU3lixL9rGEhm2bzSmB3FRZkheHXe-y9hZyyW-PRpI3hKYp9GaEhWVpHt-M5oHQJweKDaeCp8owlrJSF2lJoSUgy5hRutDKgGtgesInZ-zHeXG-gw7HXBgIq4yyP8h0L63jyEHczYNV20KOb-Z0lSh9tmgunN3-gDn2Be78cnUT50FpRUcMDK_HzJkQ5KUulrMQUAmlPKHzx93a6clK9W7PmtDs4u9o1Gulo2foaYST-GtY8XO0Y7sX6OE0Xpi_RL98AWP8u8dzByrxojUAKzGAyxn21Uiws7c386HHbYdngCDtGrfe0-AdhzA8h05qGNzyan2JB8irwv3lYjUsF_0rdHb07fRwksamCqlmVTakkHnqngzVzjIkjSHMKqpzwhqmDDFNprnJueUGfB1VU4msto0puVPrlpWFyV-j3W7Z2bcIC1FzbXlFCm1YXZW1k5XG6FwxI3LDVILIuJlSx4rj0PhiLsfQsgsJBxBaYTpDxB1Agj5v56xCvY17387HM5JjJqmTfdKpg3tnibtm2T6yby-J7KnM5B8klqBiO_MWlf7zi3u3CGj7a5TkHHKLE7Q_UpR0_A2XNqqzy00vua-oSFiC3gRCu9kWMJ0FLd_956L20aPJ6fRYHn8_-fkePQ7XZBDJ-QHtDuuN_ejQ1lDveW66BofpJrk |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=American+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynecology&rft.atitle=Early+vs+late+midline+sling+lysis+results+in+greater+improvement+in+lower+urinary+tract+symptoms&rft.au=SOUTH%2C+Mary+M.+T&rft.au=WU%2C+Jennifer+M&rft.au=WEBSTER%2C+George+D&rft.au=WEIDNER%2C+Alison+C&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.volume=200&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=564&rft.epage=566&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2008.11.018&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=21369956 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00029378%2FS0002937809X00049%2Fcov150h.gif |