The place of gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition following limited esophageal resection

Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 296 - 300
Main Authors Altorjay, Áron, Kiss, János, Paál, Balázs, Tihanyi, Zoltán, Luka, Ferenc, Farsang, Zoltán, Asztalos, Imre, Altorjay, István
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.08.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia—as early Barrett’s carcinoma—or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I–II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate ‘second-best’ method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett’s carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
AbstractList Abstract Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
OBJECTIVEAlthough stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax.METHODSBetween 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring.RESULTSThree out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II.CONCLUSIONSGastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia—as early Barrett’s carcinoma—or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I–II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate ‘second-best’ method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett’s carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II. Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture.
Author Farsang, Zoltán
Paál, Balázs
Tihanyi, Zoltán
Asztalos, Imre
Altorjay, Áron
Kiss, János
Altorjay, István
Luka, Ferenc
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Áron
  surname: Altorjay
  fullname: Altorjay, Áron
  email: altorjay@mail.fmkorhaz.hu
  organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
– sequence: 2
  givenname: János
  surname: Kiss
  fullname: Kiss, János
  organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Balázs
  surname: Paál
  fullname: Paál, Balázs
  organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zoltán
  surname: Tihanyi
  fullname: Tihanyi, Zoltán
  organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ferenc
  surname: Luka
  fullname: Luka, Ferenc
  organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zoltán
  surname: Farsang
  fullname: Farsang, Zoltán
  organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Imre
  surname: Asztalos
  fullname: Asztalos, Imre
  organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary
– sequence: 8
  givenname: István
  surname: Altorjay
  fullname: Altorjay, István
  organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17006589$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkEtv1DAURi1URB_wC5BQNrBLeh07fixRxbSgSqXSII3YWI5zM3XIxMFOBP33ZJhRu-3Kd3HOZ-mck5MhDEjIewoFBSouuwI7N6WiBKgK4AUw_YqcUSVZLhnfnCw3UMil5nBKzlPqAECwUr4hp7TSgkkGZ2SzfsBs7K3DLLTZ1qYphrzDbh5C3syhwcH2mR8mjGNIfvJhyNrQ9-GPH7ZZ73d-wibDFMYHu8UFjZjQ7bG35HVr-4Tvju8F-bH6sr66yW_vrr9efb7NHdcw5Rq4qKgG4LWjLdaNqBumFNela5GV3FKlNOdV1bCy5kza2golKskYdwqtZBfk02F3jOH3jGkyO58c9r0dMMzJCAVCg1YLyA6giyGliK0Zo9_Z-GgomH1Q05n_Qc0-qAFulqCL9eE4P9c7bJ6dY8EF-HgEbHK2b6MdnE_PnFyiV2o_VBy4MI8v_Dk_CD5N-PdJsfGXEZLJytxsfpr16n6lv2_uzTf2D-vIoOI
CODEN EJCSE7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_2050_2008_00849_x
crossref_primary_10_1556_maseb_61_2008_5_7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 Elsevier B.V. 2005
2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 Elsevier B.V. 2005
– notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID BSCLL
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039
DatabaseName Istex
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-734X
EndPage 300
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039
15963730
17006589
10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039
ark_67375_HXZ_TFQF9PXQ_J
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.2P
.I3
.ZR
0R~
1B1
1TH
29G
4.4
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5WD
71M
AABZA
AACZT
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAKAS
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABLJU
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABOCM
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABWST
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACCCW
ACFRR
ACGFS
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZCM
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJOX
AEKER
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFZL
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFXAL
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHXPO
AJEEA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
APIBT
APJGH
AQDSO
AQKUS
ASPBG
ATGXG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AZFZN
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BSCLL
BTRTY
BVRKM
BZKNY
C45
CDBKE
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DIK
DILTD
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EE~
EIHJH
EJD
EMOBN
ENERS
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FEDTE
FLUFQ
FNPLU
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
G-Q
GAUVT
GJXCC
H13
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IHE
J21
J5H
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
M27
M41
MBLQV
MHKGH
N9A
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
NQ-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OCZFY
ODMLO
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
OZT
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
Q1.
Q5Y
RD5
RIG
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RPZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
SDG
SDH
SV3
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TMA
TR2
W8F
X7H
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
~91
AASNB
AABJS
AABMN
AAESY
AAIYJ
AANRK
AAPBV
ABPTK
ACIMA
ADEIU
ADORX
ADQLU
AIKOY
AIMBJ
ALXQX
ASMCH
AWCFO
AZQFJ
BGYMP
BYORX
CASEJ
DPORF
DPPUQ
IQODW
OBFPC
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-9046519004bc1febd6bd388492cfe324a18894455d32b437aba68657334c8ea73
ISSN 1010-7940
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 09:52:54 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:35:17 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:27:32 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:07:59 EDT 2023
Wed Aug 28 03:23:11 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:53:11 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Limited esophageal resection
Early Barrett's carcinoma
Columnar metaplasia
Interposition reconstruction
Peptic stricture
Reconstruction
Stomach
Carcinoma
Duodenum
Stenosis
Surgical resection
Malignant tumor
Phlebology
Esophagus
Treatment
Surgery
Early
Circulatory system
Limit
Cardiology
Interposition
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-9046519004bc1febd6bd388492cfe324a18894455d32b437aba68657334c8ea73
Notes ark:/67375/HXZ-TFQF9PXQ-J
istex:3CF3D5D16135874F36B6CB9609040C386A144086
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-pdf/28/2/296/17774046/28-2-296.pdf
PMID 15963730
PQID 68069098
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68069098
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039
pubmed_primary_15963730
pascalfrancis_primary_17006589
oup_primary_10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039
istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_TFQF9PXQ_J
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Amsterdam
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Amsterdam
– name: Germany
PublicationTitle European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Science
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Science
SSID ssj0006327
Score 1.7992207
Snippet Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,...
Abstract Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,...
Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a...
OBJECTIVEAlthough stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
oup
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 296
SubjectTerms Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Columnar metaplasia
Duodenogastric Reflux - physiopathology
Duodenum - pathology
Duodenum - surgery
Early Barrett’s carcinoma
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophageal Stenosis - surgery
Esophagectomy - methods
Esophagitis, Peptic - etiology
Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology
Esophagogastric Junction - surgery
Esophagus - surgery
Female
Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology
Humans
Interposition reconstruction
Jejunum - pathology
Jejunum - surgery
Limited esophageal resection
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Peptic stricture
Pneumology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Stomach - pathology
Stomach - surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the heart
Treatment Outcome
Title The place of gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition following limited esophageal resection
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-TFQF9PXQ-J/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963730
https://search.proquest.com/docview/68069098
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZC2NQxr6XfXR-GNtD5uDYsiw_lrGQZXS0kELoi5Flea2X2iG22ejz_vCdPuzYtIFuLyaRLCX499P5dHe6Q-g99UNKOWxTZW44G2OH2Swlns0paHLUIYkfS4P-8XcyO8Pzpb8cDP50opbqKh7z61vPlfwPqtAGuMpTsv-AbDspNMBnwBeugDBc74yxCqqSKt8PVlabws5EVueFndQFSBSVUUMV0tKhWaMUYC9-SfPASp9sGglZxwCEikrwX6rArHynud6orlwFsdrVBfCHX_JR2TlbLcmzgo18xhR8R5uun19XaJ8r7_wkL1p9_oTpJuMCWelv123_4vIChJYKPDgvVpUZ37NY-G28XCNkpQMe5IDTlcIu7bDN7YpUXfH2hqjXVodsLDJelcY4hseOTo3UAX99pdAHtY14gfEB9TNsN1330L4L4ko5-79-a9_nxFOFf9t_3eSuUlGCN35d1XnS8_VUnX25an83xygP1qyENZjq4im7dzdKy1k8Qg_N9sQ60lx7jAYif4LuH5sAjKdoCZSzFOWsIrVup5zVo5zVUs4ylLO2lLNayj1DZ9Mvi88z2xTnsDkOncoOHUxA-4fVGPNJKuKExIlHKQ5dngrQ0tmE0hBj3088N8ZewGJGKJHZNzGnggXec7SXF7l4iSzXCQM5h4jdFHuMUZw4WKQ0xcKHsckQfWqeY7TWOViiJjgxixQCspqqHzk4AgSG6IN61u29bPNThi8GfjRbnkeL6ek0PFmeRvMh-ghg3G3Kwx5g2zGB0uHhhncNghHIZ-l0Y7ko6jIiVOYCD-kQvdDAbscamrza2fMaPdiunzdor9rU4i3owFV8qCj6F8FirZM
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+place+of+gastro-jejuno-duodenal+interposition+following+limited+esophageal+resection&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+cardio-thoracic+surgery&rft.au=Altorjay%2C+Aron&rft.au=Kiss%2C+J%C3%A1nos&rft.au=Pa%C3%A1l%2C+Bal%C3%A1zs&rft.au=Tihanyi%2C+Zolt%C3%A1n&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.issn=1010-7940&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ejcts.2005.04.039&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15963730&rft.externalDocID=15963730
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon