The place of gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition following limited esophageal resection
Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stom...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 296 - 300 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.08.2005
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia—as early Barrett’s carcinoma—or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I–II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate ‘second-best’ method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett’s carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture. OBJECTIVEAlthough stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax.METHODSBetween 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring.RESULTSThree out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II.CONCLUSIONSGastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture. Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia—as early Barrett’s carcinoma—or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Results: Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophagal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I–II. Conclusions: Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate ‘second-best’ method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett’s carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture. Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a poor long-term substitute. This anatomical configuration abolishes normal antireflux mechanisms and places the acid-excreting stomach subject to biliary reflux, moreover, in an adjacent position to the esophagus within the negative-pressure environment of the thorax. Between 1995 and 2002, 27 patients with high-grade neoplasia-as early Barrett's carcinoma-or non-dilatable peptic stricture underwent limited surgical resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In 11 of these cases, the reconstruction was performed with gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition. The long-term functional results of this specially adapted form of interposition reconstruction have been evaluated. The postoperative follow-up period ranged between 24 and 95 months (mean 68 months). Nine patients (9/11=81.8%) have agreed to undergo endoscopy, radiographic contrast-swallow examination, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Three out of nine patients (3/9=33%) demonstrated abnormal levels of esophageal acid exposure during the 24-h study period, whilst none had any evidence of bilirubin exposure in the esophageal remnant. Endoscopy revealed that three patients had reflux esophagitis in the remnant esophagus: Los Angeles A=2, C=1. No stomal or jejunal ulceration at the gastro-jejunal anastomosis could be observed. Histopathologic assessment of the squamous epithelial biopsies demonstrated microscopic evidence of inflammation: minor in two cases, moderate in one and major in one case; however, none of them had evidence of columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant at a median of 68 months after surgery. The majority of the patients have been doing well since the operation: 8/9 (88%)=Visick I-II. Gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition represents an adequate 'second-best' method of choice if technical difficulties emerge with jejunal or colon interposition following limited resection of the esophagus performed due to early Barett's carcinoma or non-dilatable peptic stricture. |
Author | Farsang, Zoltán Paál, Balázs Tihanyi, Zoltán Asztalos, Imre Altorjay, Áron Kiss, János Altorjay, István Luka, Ferenc |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Áron surname: Altorjay fullname: Altorjay, Áron email: altorjay@mail.fmkorhaz.hu organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary – sequence: 2 givenname: János surname: Kiss fullname: Kiss, János organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary – sequence: 3 givenname: Balázs surname: Paál fullname: Paál, Balázs organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary – sequence: 4 givenname: Zoltán surname: Tihanyi fullname: Tihanyi, Zoltán organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary – sequence: 5 givenname: Ferenc surname: Luka fullname: Luka, Ferenc organization: Department of Surgery, Saint George University Teaching Hospital, Seregélyesi ut 3, H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary – sequence: 6 givenname: Zoltán surname: Farsang fullname: Farsang, Zoltán organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary – sequence: 7 givenname: Imre surname: Asztalos fullname: Asztalos, Imre organization: Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary – sequence: 8 givenname: István surname: Altorjay fullname: Altorjay, István organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17006589$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkEtv1DAURi1URB_wC5BQNrBLeh07fixRxbSgSqXSII3YWI5zM3XIxMFOBP33ZJhRu-3Kd3HOZ-mck5MhDEjIewoFBSouuwI7N6WiBKgK4AUw_YqcUSVZLhnfnCw3UMil5nBKzlPqAECwUr4hp7TSgkkGZ2SzfsBs7K3DLLTZ1qYphrzDbh5C3syhwcH2mR8mjGNIfvJhyNrQ9-GPH7ZZ73d-wibDFMYHu8UFjZjQ7bG35HVr-4Tvju8F-bH6sr66yW_vrr9efb7NHdcw5Rq4qKgG4LWjLdaNqBumFNela5GV3FKlNOdV1bCy5kza2golKskYdwqtZBfk02F3jOH3jGkyO58c9r0dMMzJCAVCg1YLyA6giyGliK0Zo9_Z-GgomH1Q05n_Qc0-qAFulqCL9eE4P9c7bJ6dY8EF-HgEbHK2b6MdnE_PnFyiV2o_VBy4MI8v_Dk_CD5N-PdJsfGXEZLJytxsfpr16n6lv2_uzTf2D-vIoOI |
CODEN | EJCSE7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_2050_2008_00849_x crossref_primary_10_1556_maseb_61_2008_5_7 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2005 Elsevier B.V. 2005 2005 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2005 Elsevier B.V. 2005 – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | BSCLL IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039 |
DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1873-734X |
EndPage | 300 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039 15963730 17006589 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.039 ark_67375_HXZ_TFQF9PXQ_J |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .2P .I3 .ZR 0R~ 1B1 1TH 29G 4.4 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5WD 71M AABZA AACZT AAJKP AAJQQ AAKAS AAMVS AAOGV AAPGJ AAPNW AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT ABEJV ABEUO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABLJU ABNHQ ABNKS ABOCM ABPTD ABQLI ABQNK ABSAR ABSMQ ABWST ABXVV ABZBJ ACCCW ACFRR ACGFS ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACYHN ACZBC ADBBV ADEYI ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJQC ADOCK ADQBN ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZCM ADZXQ AEGPL AEJOX AEKER AEKSI AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFZL AFIYH AFOFC AFXAL AFXEN AFYAG AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGQXC AGSYK AGUTN AHXPO AJEEA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC APIBT APJGH AQDSO AQKUS ASPBG ATGXG ATTQO AVNTJ AVWKF AXUDD AZFZN BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BSCLL BTRTY BVRKM BZKNY C45 CDBKE CS3 CZ4 DAKXR DIK DILTD DU5 D~K E3Z EBD EBS EE~ EIHJH EJD EMOBN ENERS EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P F9B FECEO FEDTE FLUFQ FNPLU FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK G-Q GAUVT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HVGLF HW0 HZ~ IHE J21 J5H KBUDW KOP KSI KSN M27 M41 MBLQV MHKGH N9A NGC NOMLY NOYVH NQ- NVLIB O0~ O9- OAUYM OAWHX OCZFY ODMLO OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF OZT O~Y P2P PAFKI PB- PEELM Q1. Q5Y RD5 RIG ROL ROX ROZ RPZ RUSNO RW1 RXO SDG SDH SV3 TCURE TEORI TJX TMA TR2 W8F X7H YAYTL YKOAZ YXANX ~91 AASNB AABJS AABMN AAESY AAIYJ AANRK AAPBV ABPTK ACIMA ADEIU ADORX ADQLU AIKOY AIMBJ ALXQX ASMCH AWCFO AZQFJ BGYMP BYORX CASEJ DPORF DPPUQ IQODW OBFPC CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-9046519004bc1febd6bd388492cfe324a18894455d32b437aba68657334c8ea73 |
ISSN | 1010-7940 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 09:52:54 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:35:17 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:27:32 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:07:59 EDT 2023 Wed Aug 28 03:23:11 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:53:11 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Limited esophageal resection Early Barrett's carcinoma Columnar metaplasia Interposition reconstruction Peptic stricture Reconstruction Stomach Carcinoma Duodenum Stenosis Surgical resection Malignant tumor Phlebology Esophagus Treatment Surgery Early Circulatory system Limit Cardiology Interposition |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-9046519004bc1febd6bd388492cfe324a18894455d32b437aba68657334c8ea73 |
Notes | ark:/67375/HXZ-TFQF9PXQ-J istex:3CF3D5D16135874F36B6CB9609040C386A144086 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-pdf/28/2/296/17774046/28-2-296.pdf |
PMID | 15963730 |
PQID | 68069098 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68069098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039 pubmed_primary_15963730 pascalfrancis_primary_17006589 oup_primary_10_1016_j_ejcts_2005_04_039 istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_TFQF9PXQ_J |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2005 text: 2005-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Amsterdam |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Amsterdam – name: Germany |
PublicationTitle | European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Eur J Cardiothorac Surg |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur J Cardiothorac Surg |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V Elsevier Science |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Elsevier Science |
SSID | ssj0006327 |
Score | 1.7992207 |
Snippet | Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,... Abstract Objective: Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,... Although stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach, nevertheless, is a... OBJECTIVEAlthough stomach is the best choice for reconstruction after esophagectomy from the viewpoint of safety and ease, an intrathoracic stomach,... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis oup istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 296 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Columnar metaplasia Duodenogastric Reflux - physiopathology Duodenum - pathology Duodenum - surgery Early Barrett’s carcinoma Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophageal Stenosis - surgery Esophagectomy - methods Esophagitis, Peptic - etiology Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology Esophagogastric Junction - surgery Esophagus - surgery Female Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology Humans Interposition reconstruction Jejunum - pathology Jejunum - surgery Limited esophageal resection Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Peptic stricture Pneumology Postoperative Complications - etiology Stomach - pathology Stomach - surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the heart Treatment Outcome |
Title | The place of gastro-jejuno-duodenal interposition following limited esophageal resection |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-TFQF9PXQ-J/fulltext.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963730 https://search.proquest.com/docview/68069098 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZC2NQxr6XfXR-GNtD5uDYsiw_lrGQZXS0kELoi5Flea2X2iG22ejz_vCdPuzYtIFuLyaRLCX499P5dHe6Q-g99UNKOWxTZW44G2OH2Swlns0paHLUIYkfS4P-8XcyO8Pzpb8cDP50opbqKh7z61vPlfwPqtAGuMpTsv-AbDspNMBnwBeugDBc74yxCqqSKt8PVlabws5EVueFndQFSBSVUUMV0tKhWaMUYC9-SfPASp9sGglZxwCEikrwX6rArHynud6orlwFsdrVBfCHX_JR2TlbLcmzgo18xhR8R5uun19XaJ8r7_wkL1p9_oTpJuMCWelv123_4vIChJYKPDgvVpUZ37NY-G28XCNkpQMe5IDTlcIu7bDN7YpUXfH2hqjXVodsLDJelcY4hseOTo3UAX99pdAHtY14gfEB9TNsN1330L4L4ko5-79-a9_nxFOFf9t_3eSuUlGCN35d1XnS8_VUnX25an83xygP1qyENZjq4im7dzdKy1k8Qg_N9sQ60lx7jAYif4LuH5sAjKdoCZSzFOWsIrVup5zVo5zVUs4ylLO2lLNayj1DZ9Mvi88z2xTnsDkOncoOHUxA-4fVGPNJKuKExIlHKQ5dngrQ0tmE0hBj3088N8ZewGJGKJHZNzGnggXec7SXF7l4iSzXCQM5h4jdFHuMUZw4WKQ0xcKHsckQfWqeY7TWOViiJjgxixQCspqqHzk4AgSG6IN61u29bPNThi8GfjRbnkeL6ek0PFmeRvMh-ghg3G3Kwx5g2zGB0uHhhncNghHIZ-l0Y7ko6jIiVOYCD-kQvdDAbscamrza2fMaPdiunzdor9rU4i3owFV8qCj6F8FirZM |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+place+of+gastro-jejuno-duodenal+interposition+following+limited+esophageal+resection&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+cardio-thoracic+surgery&rft.au=Altorjay%2C+Aron&rft.au=Kiss%2C+J%C3%A1nos&rft.au=Pa%C3%A1l%2C+Bal%C3%A1zs&rft.au=Tihanyi%2C+Zolt%C3%A1n&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.issn=1010-7940&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ejcts.2005.04.039&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15963730&rft.externalDocID=15963730 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1010-7940&client=summon |