Comparison of two testing strategies for Mycoplasma genitalium in emergency department patients across a statewide health system
Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 78; pp. 120 - 126 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2024
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0735-6757 1532-8171 1532-8171 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.
This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.
Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).
Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time. |
---|---|
AbstractList | AbstractPurposeMycoplasma genitalium ( Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years.(Hilbert and Reno, 2018 [ 1] ) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients.(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 [ 7] ) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis ( T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen. ResultsPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), ( p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis ( p = 0.042). ConclusionsEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time. Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.PURPOSEMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.METHODSThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).RESULTSPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.CONCLUSIONSEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time. Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations. This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen. Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042). Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time. PurposeMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.ResultsPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).ConclusionsEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time. |
Author | Pavich, Emily Tieman, Molly Dumkow, Krista Johnson, Emily |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Emily surname: Johnson fullname: Johnson, Emily – sequence: 2 givenname: Molly surname: Tieman fullname: Tieman, Molly – sequence: 3 givenname: Krista surname: Dumkow fullname: Dumkow, Krista – sequence: 4 givenname: Emily surname: Pavich fullname: Pavich, Emily email: epavich@iuhealth.org |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkk1rFTEYhYNU7G31D7iQgBs3c83XfIkU5FI_oOJCXYdM5p3bjDPJmGQss_OnN-OtXVywQuCF8JyT5JycoRPrLCD0nJItJbR43W9VD-OWESa2hKbFHqENzTnLKlrSE7QhJc-zoszLU3QWQk8IpSIXT9Apr5gQTOQb9Hvnxkl5E5zFrsPxxuEIIRq7xyF6FWFvIODOefx50W4aVBgV3oM1UQ1mHrGxGEbwaUcvuIVkFUewEU8qmjQDVtq7kEayS243pgV8DWqI1zgsIcL4FD3u1BDg2d08R9_fX37bfcyuvnz4tHt3lWlRk5gVvKVFx5nWtaZM1VRzwaHrukaIhuZNo6tWaZZ3pWhJwTtSUqJyBoSVJWe14ufo1cF38u7nnJ4oRxM0DIOy4OYgWc1qktc8LxP68gjt3extul2iiqqqU7wsUS_uqLkZoZWTN6Pyi_ybbQLYAfiTgIfuHqFErgXKXq4FyrVASWhaq2t1JNIp6micTW2Y4WHp24MUUoy_DHgZdOpAQ2s86ChbZx6WXxzJ9WCs0Wr4AQuE-wioDEwS-XX9XOvfYoKQVZ8M3vzb4H-n3wJ0yeBC |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_07_056 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_72728 |
Cites_doi | 10.1128/JCM.01053-16 10.1016/j.emc.2018.06.007 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.028 10.1136/sti.2006.022970 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001227 10.1093/cid/ciaa293 10.1177/0956462413502008 10.1093/cid/civ312 10.1093/cid/civ785 10.1093/infdis/jix147 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2024. Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: 2024. Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH H94 K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2O MBDVC NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Research Library (ProQuest) Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Research Library Prep |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1532-8171 |
EndPage | 126 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38244245 10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012 S0735675724000123 1_s2_0_S0735675724000123 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 23M 354 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 7RV 7X7 88E 8F7 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JM A8Z AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABUWG ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACIWK ACPRK ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFRT ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEUYN AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BENPR BKEYQ BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q GBLVA GNUQQ GUQSH HDV HMCUK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM LX1 M1P M29 M2O M41 MO0 N4W N9A NAPCQ O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OB~ OHH OM0 OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ SV3 T5K TEORI UAP UHS UKHRP UNMZH UV1 WOW WUQ Z5R ZGI ZY1 ~G- 3V. AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV ALIPV AMFUW PKN RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU ESTFP LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7XB 8FK H94 K9. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 EFLBG |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-63d16f32cc9c12a91c343efffb44b15bbc8dac25f74d063f0710a52e0277329a3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 17:24:04 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 09:51:51 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:33:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:13 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 30 16:19:58 EDT 2024 Tue Feb 25 19:57:50 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:45:17 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Sexually transmitted infection Mycoplasma genitalium Emergency department |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-63d16f32cc9c12a91c343efffb44b15bbc8dac25f74d063f0710a52e0277329a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 38244245 |
PQID | 2968898172 |
PQPubID | 1216387 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2929059357 proquest_journals_2968898172 pubmed_primary_38244245 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0735675724000123 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2024 text: 2024-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Philadelphia |
PublicationTitle | The American journal of emergency medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Emerg Med |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier Limited |
References | Hilbert, Reno (bb0005) 2018; 36 Pearson, Peterman, Gift (bb0010) 2017; 100 Gragg, Gupta, Olson (bb0025) 2021; 48 Couldwell, Tagg, Jeoffreys (bb0050) 2013; 24 Lis, Rowhani-Rahbar, Manhart (bb0040) 2015; 61 Bachmann, Kirkcaldy, Geisler (bb0045) 2020; 71 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (bb0015) Andersen, Sokolowski, Ostergaard (bb0020) 2007; 83 Getman, Jiang, O’Donnell (bb0030) 2016; 54 Manhart, Jensen, Bradshaw (bb0055) 2015; 15 Martin, Manhart, Workowski (bb0060) 2017; 216 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines (bb0035) 2021 Lis (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0040) 2015; 61 Pearson (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0010) 2017; 100 Bachmann (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0045) 2020; 71 Couldwell (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0050) 2013; 24 Manhart (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0055) 2015; 15 Andersen (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0020) 2007; 83 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0015) Gragg (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0025) 2021; 48 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0035) Getman (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0030) 2016; 54 Martin (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0060) 2017; 216 Hilbert (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0005) 2018; 36 |
References_xml | – volume: 54 start-page: 2278 year: 2016 end-page: 2283 ident: bb0030 article-title: prevalence, coinfection, and macrolide antibiotic resistance frequency in a multicenter clinical study cohort in the United States publication-title: J Clin Microbiol – volume: 61 start-page: 418 year: 2015 end-page: 426 ident: bb0040 article-title: infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – volume: 83 start-page: 237 year: 2007 end-page: 241 ident: bb0020 article-title: : prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population publication-title: Sex Transm Infect – volume: 48 start-page: e27 year: 2021 end-page: e29 ident: bb0025 article-title: infection in young women without urogenital symptoms presenting to a community-based emergency department in Birmingham, Alabama publication-title: Sex Transm Dis – volume: 24 start-page: 822 year: 2013 end-page: 828 ident: bb0050 article-title: Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in publication-title: Int J STD AIDS – year: 2021 ident: bb0035 article-title: Mycoplasma Genitalium – volume: 216 start-page: S427 year: 2017 end-page: S430 ident: bb0060 article-title: from basic science to public health: summary of the results from a national institute of allergy and infectious diseases technical consultation and consensus recommendations for future research priorities publication-title: J Infect Dis – volume: 71 start-page: e624 year: 2020 end-page: e632 ident: bb0045 article-title: Prevalence of publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – volume: 100 start-page: 143 year: 2017 end-page: 144 ident: bb0010 article-title: An increase in sexually transmitted infections seen in US emergency departments publication-title: Prev Med – volume: 15 start-page: S802 year: 2015 end-page: S817 ident: bb0055 article-title: Efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – ident: bb0015 article-title: – CDC Detailed Fact Sheet – volume: 36 start-page: 767 year: 2018 end-page: 776 ident: bb0005 article-title: Management of patients with sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department publication-title: Emerg Med Clin North Am – volume: 54 start-page: 2278 issue: 9 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0030 article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium prevalence, coinfection, and macrolide antibiotic resistance frequency in a multicenter clinical study cohort in the United States publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.01053-16 – volume: 36 start-page: 767 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0005 article-title: Management of patients with sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department publication-title: Emerg Med Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2018.06.007 – volume: 100 start-page: 143 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0010 article-title: An increase in sexually transmitted infections seen in US emergency departments publication-title: Prev Med doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.028 – volume: 83 start-page: 237 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0020 article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population publication-title: Sex Transm Infect doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.022970 – volume: 48 start-page: e27 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0025 article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium infection in young women without urogenital symptoms presenting to a community-based emergency department in Birmingham, Alabama publication-title: Sex Transm Dis doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001227 – volume: 71 start-page: e624 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0045 article-title: Prevalence of mycoplasma genitalium infection, antimicrobial resistance mutations, and symptom resolution following treatment of urethritis publication-title: Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa293 – ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0035 – volume: 24 start-page: 822 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0050 article-title: Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in mycoplasma genitalium infections due to macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance publication-title: Int J STD AIDS doi: 10.1177/0956462413502008 – volume: 61 start-page: 418 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0040 article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis publication-title: Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312 – volume: 15 start-page: S802 issue: 61 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0055 article-title: Efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for mycoplasma genitalium infections publication-title: Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/civ785 – ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0015 – volume: 216 start-page: S427 issue: suppl_2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0060 article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium from basic science to public health: summary of the results from a national institute of allergy and infectious diseases technical consultation and consensus recommendations for future research priorities publication-title: J Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix147 |
SSID | ssj0011454 |
Score | 2.3894176 |
Snippet | Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in... AbstractPurposeMycoplasma genitalium ( Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in... PurposeMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 120 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Algorithms Antibiotics Asymptomatic Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis Chlamydia trachomatis Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Disease control Emergency Emergency department Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital Factor analysis Female Females Gonorrhea Gonorrhea - diagnosis Humans Infections Infertility Male Medical records Mycoplasma genitalium Neisseria gonorrhoeae Pelvic inflammatory disease Prevalence Prevention Retrospective Studies Risk factors Sex crimes Sexually transmitted diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology Sexually transmitted infection STD Trichomonas vaginalis Vagina Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3Ni9QwFA-6gngRv62uEsGbFCdfTXISWVwWYbzowtxCkiYyi9uO2w6LN_9089K0XtwRSi9NmpC85P2S997vIfRWMxGFExzOJiK9VrG2iohaRmG1SxpX5cuc9Zfm7Jx_3ohNuXAbilvlvCfmjbrtPdyRv6e6UUqrpG8_7H7WkDUKrKslhcZtdCdTlyV5lpvlwJWgfs6ClqQYHOyFLEEzk3-XvQgQiU55pu0k9CbFdBPwzAro9AG6X5Aj_jhN9UN0K3SP0N11sY0_Rr9PlpSCuI94vO7xCBQa3Xc8jDMhBE4YFa9_-X6XUPOlxUl8IGvIdn-Jtx0OcywmbpOWusoO6Lgwrw7Y5o5ji3MQ0vW2DXiKosQTHfQTdH766dvJWV3yK9Se69VYN6wlTWTUe-0JtZp4xlmIMTrOHRHOedVaT0WUvE1IJgIasYIGMPsyqi17io66vgvPEW5lI6XlAahoOJU0natb5WJQ0cWG2aZCZB5c4wv5OOTA-GFmL7MLAxNiYELMiqSHVujdUmc3UW8cLM3mOTNzUGnaBk3SDAdryX_VCkNZyYMhZqBmZb6CEIEMgc8t4NAKiaVmASsTCPlvi8ezQJmlkb_CXaE3y-e00MF6Y7vQ76EM1ZB_UcgKPZsEcRkWphJKo1y8OPzzl-ge9GRyPDpGR-PVPrxKmGp0r_PC-QPxcx-V priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparison of two testing strategies for Mycoplasma genitalium in emergency department patients across a statewide health system |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0735675724000123 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0735675724000123 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244245 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2968898172 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929059357 |
Volume | 78 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3ta9QwGH_YbiB-Ed-tzhHBb1Lv8tY0H-excXrcIdPhfQtpm0iHa4-1x_CL-KebtGlBdBOEktI2DwnJkzy_9HkDeC0ptzzjzJ9NuCtmNtYp5rGwXMvMSdy0-5mzWieLc_Zhwzd7MB98YbxZZdj7-z29263Dm2kYzem2LKefHHNyB3eFt4L0yGAfDgiVCZ_AwfH75WI9KhMw65Kh-fqxJwi-M72Zl74w3iGdsC56JyY3yaeb8Gcnh07vw70AINFx38cHsGeqh3BnFVTkj-DnfMwsiGqL2usatT6SRvUVNe0QFwI5qIpW3_N668DzpUaOi3zykHJ3icoKmcElExVOWF11dugoBGBtkO46jjTqfJGuy8Kg3pkS9VGhH8P56cnn-SIOaRbinMlZGye0wImlJM9ljomWOKeMGmttxliGeZblaaFzwq1ghQM01oMSzYnx2l9KpKZPYFLVlXkGqBCJEJoZH5GGEUHc8bpIM2tSm9mE6iQCPAyuykMMcp8K45sajM0ulJ8Q5SdEzbC7SARvRpptH4Hj1tp0mDM1-Ja63VA5AXErlfgblWnCgm4UVg1RM_UH00XAR8rf-PafLR4ODKXGRohM0lSmDlNG8Gr87Na7V-LoytQ7X4dIn4aRiwie9ow4DgtNHVgjjD__z069gLv-qTdMOoRJe7UzLx3marMj2H_7A7tSbMRRWF_-vjz7snT3dyfrj2e_ANUELqs |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrQS9IN4EChgJTihi7dh5HBCC0mpLuysErdSbcRwbbdUmS5PVqjd-Eb8RTxKHC11OlaJcYjuWZzzz2fMCeJVFwopccDybCPca21ClVISJFSrLncZN28uc6SyeHPPPJ-JkA377WBh0q_QysRXURaXxjvwty-I0zVKnb98vfoZYNQqtq76ERscWB-Zy5Y5s9bv9T46-rxnb2z3amYR9VYFQ82zchHFU0NhGTOtMU6YyqiMeGWttznlORZ7rtFCaCZvwwulvizpYCWbQ2BmxTEVu3BuwyTGidQSbH3dnX74OdgvK27prbt-gS79I-jCdzqNMnRqMfWe8TRRK2VWq8Cqo26q8vTtwu8eq5EPHXHdhw5T34Oa0t8bfh187QxFDUlnSrCrSYNKO8gepG5-CgjhUTKaXulo4nH6uiGNYrFMyX56TeUmMj_4khdOLF63LO-lzvdZEtRMnirRhT6t5YUgXt0m6BNQP4Pha1v4hjMqqNI-BFEmcJIobTH7DWcLcSb5Ic2tSm9s4UnEA1C-u1H26c6y6cSa9X9upRIJIJIgcU_ewAN4MfRZdso-1rSNPM-nDWJ3glU4Xre2V_KuXqXvZUUsqaybH8hsyEfIQevki8g1ADD17eNTBnv_-cdszlBx-8nc7BfBy-OxEC9qLVGmqJbZhGVZ8FEkAjzpGHJYlSh0uZFw8WT_4C7g1OZoeysP92cFT2MJZdW5P2zBqLpbmmUN0Tf6830YEvl_3zv0DW1Zd2A |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkSouiDeBAkaCE4q68SNODgihllVL2QoJKu3NOI6NtqLJ0mS16o3fxa9jJonDhS6nSlEusR3Lnsc39jwIeZVz6WUhBdomEl4TH5sskbHy0uQFaNysO8yZnaSHp-LjXM63yO8QC4NulUEmdoK6rC2eke-xPM2yPAN9u-cHt4jPB9N3y58xVpDCm9ZQTqMnkWN3uQbzrXl7dAB7_Zqx6Yev-4fxUGEgtiKftHHKyyT1nFmb24SZPLFccOe9L4QoElkUNiuNZdIrUYIu96iPjWQOLz45yw2HcW-Qm4oDqgJeUvPR2AMzo6vABhyEzv1SDQE7vW-ZOXMYBc9ElzI0YVcpxatAb6f8pnfI7QG10vc9md0lW666R3Zmw738ffJrfyxnSGtP23VNW0zfUX2nTRuSUVDAx3R2aeslIPZzQ4F0sWLJYnVOFxV1IQ6UlqAhLzrndzpkfW2o6SZODe0CoNaL0tE-gpP2qagfkNNrWfmHZLuqK_eY0FKlShnhMA2OYIqBTV9mhXeZL3zKTRqRJCyutkPic6y_8UMHD7czjRuicUP0JIGHReTN2GfZp_3Y2JqHPdMhoBVEsAattLGX-lcv1wxSpNGJbpie6C9IREhD6O-LGDgicuw5AKUeAP33j7uBoPT4k7-MFZGX42cQMnhzZCpXr7ANy7H2o1QRedQT4rgsPAOEyIR8snnwF2QH-FV_Ojo5fkpu4aR6_6ddst1erNwzgHZt8bzjIUq-XTfT_gGUIGCf |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+two+testing+strategies+for+Mycoplasma+genitalium+in+emergency+department+patients+across+a+statewide+health+system&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Johnson%2C+Emily&rft.au=Tieman%2C+Molly&rft.au=Dumkow%2C+Krista&rft.au=Pavich%2C+Emily&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajem.2024.01.012&rft.externalDocID=S0735675724000123 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon |