Comparison of two testing strategies for Mycoplasma genitalium in emergency department patients across a statewide health system

Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 78; pp. 120 - 126
Main Authors Johnson, Emily, Tieman, Molly, Dumkow, Krista, Pavich, Emily
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2024
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0735-6757
1532-8171
1532-8171
DOI10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations. This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen. Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042). Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.
AbstractList AbstractPurposeMycoplasma genitalium ( Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years.(Hilbert and Reno, 2018 [ 1] ) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients.(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 [ 7] ) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis ( T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen. ResultsPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), ( p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis ( p = 0.042). ConclusionsEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.
Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.PURPOSEMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.METHODSThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).RESULTSPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.CONCLUSIONSEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.
Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21-23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations. This multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen. Percent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042). Evidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.
PurposeMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in men aged 21–23 years. (Hilbert and Reno, 2018) A cross-sectional study conducted in a community emergency department (ED) determined that the prevalence of Mgen was 14.8% in asymptomatic female patients. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines recommend testing for Mgen in select circumstances. This study aims to determine what testing strategy in ED patients results in the most appropriate treatment of Mgen based on CDC recommendations.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, pre- and post-intervention cohort study assessed adherence to CDC recommendations for appropriate management of Mgen in ED patients. Inclusion criteria were patients at least 18 years of age discharged from one of the 15 ED sites within the health system studied who were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), and Mgen. Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant, sexually assaulted, or had indeterminate STI results. For cohort 1, which included patients evaluated from May 2022 through July 2022, Mgen was incorporated into the standard STI testing panel. Cohort 2 consisted of patients evaluated from September 2022 through November 2022; testing for Mgen in cohort 2 was optional, and a testing algorithm based on CDC recommendations was disseminated to ED sites. The primary endpoint was the number of subjects treated appropriately for Mgen in accordance with CDC recommendations. Cohort 1 secondary endpoints included overall prevalence of Mgen in patients who presented to ED sites for STI testing and prevalence in ICD-10 code diagnosed PID. Secondary endpoints for both cohorts included baseline characteristics of patients who tested positive for Mgen.ResultsPercent appropriate treatment did not differ significantly between cohort 1 (21%) and cohort 2 (20%), (p > 0.9). However, greater than three times as many subjects were inappropriately treated for Mgen in cohort 1 when the health system studied did not adhere to current CDC Mgen testing recommendations. The overall prevalence of Mgen in ED patients who were tested for STIs was 13.1%. The prevalence of PID ICD-10 diagnosis code in patients positive for Mgen was 2.9%. Based on results of a risk factor analysis to determine if certain baseline characteristics are indicators for a positive infection with Mgen, a positive Mgen result was significantly associated with a positive result for T. vaginalis (p = 0.042).ConclusionsEvidence regarding the preferred testing strategy for Mgen is currently limited. This study demonstrates that testing all STI presenting patients for Mgen results in antibiotic overuse, so adhering to CDC testing recommendations is important. Prevalence of positive Mgen result in ED patients tested for STIs was similar to results of previously published literature. Risk factor analysis results could be used as a screening method to determine what patients should be considered for Mgen testing. Based on the results of this study, we recommend against including Mgen on the standard ED STI testing panel at this time.
Author Pavich, Emily
Tieman, Molly
Dumkow, Krista
Johnson, Emily
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Emily
  surname: Johnson
  fullname: Johnson, Emily
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Molly
  surname: Tieman
  fullname: Tieman, Molly
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Krista
  surname: Dumkow
  fullname: Dumkow, Krista
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Emily
  surname: Pavich
  fullname: Pavich, Emily
  email: epavich@iuhealth.org
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk1rFTEYhYNU7G31D7iQgBs3c83XfIkU5FI_oOJCXYdM5p3bjDPJmGQss_OnN-OtXVywQuCF8JyT5JycoRPrLCD0nJItJbR43W9VD-OWESa2hKbFHqENzTnLKlrSE7QhJc-zoszLU3QWQk8IpSIXT9Apr5gQTOQb9Hvnxkl5E5zFrsPxxuEIIRq7xyF6FWFvIODOefx50W4aVBgV3oM1UQ1mHrGxGEbwaUcvuIVkFUewEU8qmjQDVtq7kEayS243pgV8DWqI1zgsIcL4FD3u1BDg2d08R9_fX37bfcyuvnz4tHt3lWlRk5gVvKVFx5nWtaZM1VRzwaHrukaIhuZNo6tWaZZ3pWhJwTtSUqJyBoSVJWe14ufo1cF38u7nnJ4oRxM0DIOy4OYgWc1qktc8LxP68gjt3extul2iiqqqU7wsUS_uqLkZoZWTN6Pyi_ybbQLYAfiTgIfuHqFErgXKXq4FyrVASWhaq2t1JNIp6micTW2Y4WHp24MUUoy_DHgZdOpAQ2s86ChbZx6WXxzJ9WCs0Wr4AQuE-wioDEwS-XX9XOvfYoKQVZ8M3vzb4H-n3wJ0yeBC
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_07_056
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_72728
Cites_doi 10.1128/JCM.01053-16
10.1016/j.emc.2018.06.007
10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.028
10.1136/sti.2006.022970
10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001227
10.1093/cid/ciaa293
10.1177/0956462413502008
10.1093/cid/civ312
10.1093/cid/civ785
10.1093/infdis/jix147
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2024. Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2024. Elsevier Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7RV
7T5
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H94
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
M2O
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
Immunology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Research Library (ProQuest)
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Research Library Prep

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1532-8171
EndPage 126
ExternalDocumentID 38244245
10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012
S0735675724000123
1_s2_0_S0735675724000123
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
354
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
8F7
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
A8Z
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUWG
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFRT
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKEYQ
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C45
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HDV
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
LX1
M1P
M29
M2O
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OBH
OB~
OHH
OM0
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
TEORI
UAP
UHS
UKHRP
UNMZH
UV1
WOW
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
ZY1
~G-
3V.
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
ALIPV
AMFUW
PKN
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
ESTFP
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7XB
8FK
H94
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
EFLBG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-63d16f32cc9c12a91c343efffb44b15bbc8dac25f74d063f0710a52e0277329a3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0735-6757
1532-8171
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 17:24:04 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 09:51:51 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:33:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:13 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 30 16:19:58 EDT 2024
Tue Feb 25 19:57:50 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:45:17 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Sexually transmitted infection
Mycoplasma genitalium
Emergency department
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c490t-63d16f32cc9c12a91c343efffb44b15bbc8dac25f74d063f0710a52e0277329a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 38244245
PQID 2968898172
PQPubID 1216387
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2929059357
proquest_journals_2968898172
pubmed_primary_38244245
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0735675724000123
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_01_012
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Philadelphia
PublicationTitle The American journal of emergency medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Emerg Med
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Hilbert, Reno (bb0005) 2018; 36
Pearson, Peterman, Gift (bb0010) 2017; 100
Gragg, Gupta, Olson (bb0025) 2021; 48
Couldwell, Tagg, Jeoffreys (bb0050) 2013; 24
Lis, Rowhani-Rahbar, Manhart (bb0040) 2015; 61
Bachmann, Kirkcaldy, Geisler (bb0045) 2020; 71
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (bb0015)
Andersen, Sokolowski, Ostergaard (bb0020) 2007; 83
Getman, Jiang, O’Donnell (bb0030) 2016; 54
Manhart, Jensen, Bradshaw (bb0055) 2015; 15
Martin, Manhart, Workowski (bb0060) 2017; 216
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines (bb0035) 2021
Lis (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0040) 2015; 61
Pearson (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0010) 2017; 100
Bachmann (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0045) 2020; 71
Couldwell (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0050) 2013; 24
Manhart (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0055) 2015; 15
Andersen (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0020) 2007; 83
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0015)
Gragg (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0025) 2021; 48
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0035)
Getman (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0030) 2016; 54
Martin (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0060) 2017; 216
Hilbert (10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0005) 2018; 36
References_xml – volume: 54
  start-page: 2278
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2283
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: prevalence, coinfection, and macrolide antibiotic resistance frequency in a multicenter clinical study cohort in the United States
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
– volume: 61
  start-page: 418
  year: 2015
  end-page: 426
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– volume: 83
  start-page: 237
  year: 2007
  end-page: 241
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: : prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population
  publication-title: Sex Transm Infect
– volume: 48
  start-page: e27
  year: 2021
  end-page: e29
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: infection in young women without urogenital symptoms presenting to a community-based emergency department in Birmingham, Alabama
  publication-title: Sex Transm Dis
– volume: 24
  start-page: 822
  year: 2013
  end-page: 828
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in
  publication-title: Int J STD AIDS
– year: 2021
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Mycoplasma Genitalium
– volume: 216
  start-page: S427
  year: 2017
  end-page: S430
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: from basic science to public health: summary of the results from a national institute of allergy and infectious diseases technical consultation and consensus recommendations for future research priorities
  publication-title: J Infect Dis
– volume: 71
  start-page: e624
  year: 2020
  end-page: e632
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Prevalence of
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– volume: 100
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  end-page: 144
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: An increase in sexually transmitted infections seen in US emergency departments
  publication-title: Prev Med
– volume: 15
  start-page: S802
  year: 2015
  end-page: S817
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– ident: bb0015
  article-title: – CDC Detailed Fact Sheet
– volume: 36
  start-page: 767
  year: 2018
  end-page: 776
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Management of patients with sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department
  publication-title: Emerg Med Clin North Am
– volume: 54
  start-page: 2278
  issue: 9
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0030
  article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium prevalence, coinfection, and macrolide antibiotic resistance frequency in a multicenter clinical study cohort in the United States
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.01053-16
– volume: 36
  start-page: 767
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0005
  article-title: Management of patients with sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department
  publication-title: Emerg Med Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2018.06.007
– volume: 100
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0010
  article-title: An increase in sexually transmitted infections seen in US emergency departments
  publication-title: Prev Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.028
– volume: 83
  start-page: 237
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0020
  article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population
  publication-title: Sex Transm Infect
  doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.022970
– volume: 48
  start-page: e27
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0025
  article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium infection in young women without urogenital symptoms presenting to a community-based emergency department in Birmingham, Alabama
  publication-title: Sex Transm Dis
  doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001227
– volume: 71
  start-page: e624
  issue: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0045
  article-title: Prevalence of mycoplasma genitalium infection, antimicrobial resistance mutations, and symptom resolution following treatment of urethritis
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa293
– ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0035
– volume: 24
  start-page: 822
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0050
  article-title: Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in mycoplasma genitalium infections due to macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance
  publication-title: Int J STD AIDS
  doi: 10.1177/0956462413502008
– volume: 61
  start-page: 418
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0040
  article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312
– volume: 15
  start-page: S802
  issue: 61
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0055
  article-title: Efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for mycoplasma genitalium infections
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1093/cid/civ785
– ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0015
– volume: 216
  start-page: S427
  issue: suppl_2
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012_bb0060
  article-title: Mycoplasma genitalium from basic science to public health: summary of the results from a national institute of allergy and infectious diseases technical consultation and consensus recommendations for future research priorities
  publication-title: J Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix147
SSID ssj0011454
Score 2.3894176
Snippet Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and 1.1% in...
AbstractPurposeMycoplasma genitalium ( Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in...
PurposeMycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has an estimated prevalence in the general population of 2.3% in women and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 120
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Algorithms
Antibiotics
Asymptomatic
Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis
Chlamydia trachomatis
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease control
Emergency
Emergency department
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency Service, Hospital
Factor analysis
Female
Females
Gonorrhea
Gonorrhea - diagnosis
Humans
Infections
Infertility
Male
Medical records
Mycoplasma genitalium
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Prevalence
Prevention
Retrospective Studies
Risk factors
Sex crimes
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology
Sexually transmitted infection
STD
Trichomonas vaginalis
Vagina
Womens health
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3Ni9QwFA-6gngRv62uEsGbFCdfTXISWVwWYbzowtxCkiYyi9uO2w6LN_9089K0XtwRSi9NmpC85P2S997vIfRWMxGFExzOJiK9VrG2iohaRmG1SxpX5cuc9Zfm7Jx_3ohNuXAbilvlvCfmjbrtPdyRv6e6UUqrpG8_7H7WkDUKrKslhcZtdCdTlyV5lpvlwJWgfs6ClqQYHOyFLEEzk3-XvQgQiU55pu0k9CbFdBPwzAro9AG6X5Aj_jhN9UN0K3SP0N11sY0_Rr9PlpSCuI94vO7xCBQa3Xc8jDMhBE4YFa9_-X6XUPOlxUl8IGvIdn-Jtx0OcywmbpOWusoO6Lgwrw7Y5o5ji3MQ0vW2DXiKosQTHfQTdH766dvJWV3yK9Se69VYN6wlTWTUe-0JtZp4xlmIMTrOHRHOedVaT0WUvE1IJgIasYIGMPsyqi17io66vgvPEW5lI6XlAahoOJU0natb5WJQ0cWG2aZCZB5c4wv5OOTA-GFmL7MLAxNiYELMiqSHVujdUmc3UW8cLM3mOTNzUGnaBk3SDAdryX_VCkNZyYMhZqBmZb6CEIEMgc8t4NAKiaVmASsTCPlvi8ezQJmlkb_CXaE3y-e00MF6Y7vQ76EM1ZB_UcgKPZsEcRkWphJKo1y8OPzzl-ge9GRyPDpGR-PVPrxKmGp0r_PC-QPxcx-V
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Comparison of two testing strategies for Mycoplasma genitalium in emergency department patients across a statewide health system
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0735675724000123
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0735675724000123
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244245
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2968898172
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929059357
Volume 78
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3ta9QwGH_YbiB-Ed-tzhHBb1Lv8tY0H-excXrcIdPhfQtpm0iHa4-1x_CL-KebtGlBdBOEktI2DwnJkzy_9HkDeC0ptzzjzJ9NuCtmNtYp5rGwXMvMSdy0-5mzWieLc_Zhwzd7MB98YbxZZdj7-z29263Dm2kYzem2LKefHHNyB3eFt4L0yGAfDgiVCZ_AwfH75WI9KhMw65Kh-fqxJwi-M72Zl74w3iGdsC56JyY3yaeb8Gcnh07vw70AINFx38cHsGeqh3BnFVTkj-DnfMwsiGqL2usatT6SRvUVNe0QFwI5qIpW3_N668DzpUaOi3zykHJ3icoKmcElExVOWF11dugoBGBtkO46jjTqfJGuy8Kg3pkS9VGhH8P56cnn-SIOaRbinMlZGye0wImlJM9ljomWOKeMGmttxliGeZblaaFzwq1ghQM01oMSzYnx2l9KpKZPYFLVlXkGqBCJEJoZH5GGEUHc8bpIM2tSm9mE6iQCPAyuykMMcp8K45sajM0ulJ8Q5SdEzbC7SARvRpptH4Hj1tp0mDM1-Ja63VA5AXErlfgblWnCgm4UVg1RM_UH00XAR8rf-PafLR4ODKXGRohM0lSmDlNG8Gr87Na7V-LoytQ7X4dIn4aRiwie9ow4DgtNHVgjjD__z069gLv-qTdMOoRJe7UzLx3marMj2H_7A7tSbMRRWF_-vjz7snT3dyfrj2e_ANUELqs
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrQS9IN4EChgJTihi7dh5HBCC0mpLuysErdSbcRwbbdUmS5PVqjd-Eb8RTxKHC11OlaJcYjuWZzzz2fMCeJVFwopccDybCPca21ClVISJFSrLncZN28uc6SyeHPPPJ-JkA377WBh0q_QysRXURaXxjvwty-I0zVKnb98vfoZYNQqtq76ERscWB-Zy5Y5s9bv9T46-rxnb2z3amYR9VYFQ82zchHFU0NhGTOtMU6YyqiMeGWttznlORZ7rtFCaCZvwwulvizpYCWbQ2BmxTEVu3BuwyTGidQSbH3dnX74OdgvK27prbt-gS79I-jCdzqNMnRqMfWe8TRRK2VWq8Cqo26q8vTtwu8eq5EPHXHdhw5T34Oa0t8bfh187QxFDUlnSrCrSYNKO8gepG5-CgjhUTKaXulo4nH6uiGNYrFMyX56TeUmMj_4khdOLF63LO-lzvdZEtRMnirRhT6t5YUgXt0m6BNQP4Pha1v4hjMqqNI-BFEmcJIobTH7DWcLcSb5Ic2tSm9s4UnEA1C-u1H26c6y6cSa9X9upRIJIJIgcU_ewAN4MfRZdso-1rSNPM-nDWJ3glU4Xre2V_KuXqXvZUUsqaybH8hsyEfIQevki8g1ADD17eNTBnv_-cdszlBx-8nc7BfBy-OxEC9qLVGmqJbZhGVZ8FEkAjzpGHJYlSh0uZFw8WT_4C7g1OZoeysP92cFT2MJZdW5P2zBqLpbmmUN0Tf6830YEvl_3zv0DW1Zd2A
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkSouiDeBAkaCE4q68SNODgihllVL2QoJKu3NOI6NtqLJ0mS16o3fxa9jJonDhS6nSlEusR3Lnsc39jwIeZVz6WUhBdomEl4TH5sskbHy0uQFaNysO8yZnaSHp-LjXM63yO8QC4NulUEmdoK6rC2eke-xPM2yPAN9u-cHt4jPB9N3y58xVpDCm9ZQTqMnkWN3uQbzrXl7dAB7_Zqx6Yev-4fxUGEgtiKftHHKyyT1nFmb24SZPLFccOe9L4QoElkUNiuNZdIrUYIu96iPjWQOLz45yw2HcW-Qm4oDqgJeUvPR2AMzo6vABhyEzv1SDQE7vW-ZOXMYBc9ElzI0YVcpxatAb6f8pnfI7QG10vc9md0lW666R3Zmw738ffJrfyxnSGtP23VNW0zfUX2nTRuSUVDAx3R2aeslIPZzQ4F0sWLJYnVOFxV1IQ6UlqAhLzrndzpkfW2o6SZODe0CoNaL0tE-gpP2qagfkNNrWfmHZLuqK_eY0FKlShnhMA2OYIqBTV9mhXeZL3zKTRqRJCyutkPic6y_8UMHD7czjRuicUP0JIGHReTN2GfZp_3Y2JqHPdMhoBVEsAattLGX-lcv1wxSpNGJbpie6C9IREhD6O-LGDgicuw5AKUeAP33j7uBoPT4k7-MFZGX42cQMnhzZCpXr7ANy7H2o1QRedQT4rgsPAOEyIR8snnwF2QH-FV_Ojo5fkpu4aR6_6ddst1erNwzgHZt8bzjIUq-XTfT_gGUIGCf
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+two+testing+strategies+for+Mycoplasma+genitalium+in+emergency+department+patients+across+a+statewide+health+system&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Johnson%2C+Emily&rft.au=Tieman%2C+Molly&rft.au=Dumkow%2C+Krista&rft.au=Pavich%2C+Emily&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajem.2024.01.012&rft.externalDocID=S0735675724000123
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0735-6757&client=summon