The Effect of Traditional Cupping on Pain and Mechanical Thresholds in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study

• Published in: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine Vol. 2012; no. 2012; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Dobos, Gustav, Langhorst, Jost, Saha, Felix J., Rampp, Thomas, Choi, Kyung-Eun, Hohmann, Claudia, Cramer, Holger, Lauche, Romy, Musial, Frauke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2012; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Andre helsefag: 829; Community medicine, Social medicine: 801; Ductility tests; Family medical history; Health sciences: 800; Helsefag: 800; Hyperalgesia; Manipulative therapy; Medical disciplines: 700; Medisinske Fag: 700; Neck; Neck pain; Nondestructive testing; Other health science disciplines: 829; Pain perception; Patients; Physical therapy; Quality of life; Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801; Socioeconomic factors; Thresholds; VDP; Vibration; Vibration measurement
• ISSN: 1741-427X; 1741-4288; 1741-4288
• DOI: 10.1155/2012/429718

Introduction. Cupping has been used since antiquity in the treatment of pain conditions. In this pilot study, we investigated the effect of traditional cupping therapy on chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNP) and mechanical sensory thresholds. Methods. Fifty CNP patients were randomly assigned to treatment (TG, n=25) or waiting list control group (WL, n=25). TG received a single cupping treatment. Pain at rest (PR), pain related to movement (PM), quality of life (SF-36), Neck Disability Index (NDI), mechanical detection (MDT), vibration detection (MDT), and pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured before and three days after a single cupping treatment. Patients also kept a pain and medication diary (PaDi, MeDi) during the study. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. After cupping TG reported significantly less pain (PR: −17.9 mm VAS, 95%CI −29.2 to −6.6; PM: −19.7, 95%CI −32.2 to −7.2; PaDi: −1.5 points on NRS, 95%CI −2.5 to −0.4; all P<0.05) and higher quality of life than WL (SF-36, Physical Functioning: 7.5, 95%CI 1.4 to 13.5; Bodily Pain: 14.9, 95%CI 4.4 to 25.4; Physical Component Score: 5.0, 95%CI 1.4 to 8.5; all P<0.05). No significant effect was found for NDI, MDT, or VDT, but TG showed significantly higher PPT at pain-areas than WL (in lg(kPa); pain-maximum: 0.088, 95%CI 0.029 to 0.148, pain-adjacent: 0.118, 95%CI 0.038 to 0.199; both P<0.01). Conclusion. A single application of traditional cupping might be an effective treatment for improving pain, quality of life, and hyperalgesia in CNP.