Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration
•Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here. Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems ha...
Saved in:
Published in | Ecological indicators Vol. 123; p. 107362 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2021
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here.
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR). |
---|---|
AbstractList | •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here.
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR). Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by novel index informing on 'what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered': the 'Achieved Restoration' index (AR). Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER⁺), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER⁻). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR). Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR). |
ArticleNumber | 107362 |
Author | Corcket, Emmanuel Comin, Francisco Rey Benayas, Jose M. Buisson, Elise Martínez-Ruiz, Carolina Castagneyrol, Bastien Alday, Josu G. Jaunatre, Renaud Mench, Michel Alard, Didier Marchand, Lilian Dutoit, Thierry Jiménez, Juan J. Benot, Marie-Lise |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lilian surname: Marchand fullname: Marchand, Lilian email: lilian.marchand@suez.com organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain – sequence: 2 givenname: Bastien surname: Castagneyrol fullname: Castagneyrol, Bastien organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France – sequence: 3 givenname: Juan J. surname: Jiménez fullname: Jiménez, Juan J. organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain – sequence: 4 givenname: Jose M. surname: Rey Benayas fullname: Rey Benayas, Jose M. organization: Life Sciences Department, Alcala University, E-28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain – sequence: 5 givenname: Marie-Lise surname: Benot fullname: Benot, Marie-Lise organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France – sequence: 6 givenname: Carolina surname: Martínez-Ruiz fullname: Martínez-Ruiz, Carolina organization: Agroforestry Sciences Department, University of Valladolid, Campus La Yutera, Avda. de Madrid 50, 34071 Palencia, Spain – sequence: 7 givenname: Josu G. surname: Alday fullname: Alday, Josu G. organization: Joint Research Unit CTFC - AGROTECNIO, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E25198 Lleida, Spain – sequence: 8 givenname: Renaud surname: Jaunatre fullname: Jaunatre, Renaud organization: Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, F-38402 St-Martin-d'Hères, France – sequence: 9 givenname: Thierry surname: Dutoit fullname: Dutoit, Thierry organization: Univ. Avignon. Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE). UMR CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université, IUT site Agroparc, 337 Chemin des Meinajaries BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon cedex 09, France – sequence: 10 givenname: Elise surname: Buisson fullname: Buisson, Elise organization: Univ. Avignon. Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE). UMR CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université, IUT site Agroparc, 337 Chemin des Meinajaries BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon cedex 09, France – sequence: 11 givenname: Michel surname: Mench fullname: Mench, Michel organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France – sequence: 12 givenname: Didier surname: Alard fullname: Alard, Didier organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France – sequence: 13 givenname: Emmanuel surname: Corcket fullname: Corcket, Emmanuel organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France – sequence: 14 givenname: Francisco surname: Comin fullname: Comin, Francisco organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain |
BackLink | https://hal.science/hal-03119373$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqFkU1r3DAYhE1JoUnan1DwsT148-rDkkUPJSxtE1jopYXchCy_3tXilbaSNpB_XzleAu0lJ4nhmZGYuaoufPBYVR8JrAgQcbNfoQ2T88OKAiVFk0zQN9Ul6SRtJDB-Ue5cQkMEPLyrrlLaQ_EpJS6rh3XwFo_5ZKba-KE-YN6FIUxh62yRXEonTLXzNabsDiY7v63zDut0shZTqsNYz4-f8VioEAsV_Pvq7WimhB_O53X1-_u3X-u7ZvPzx_36dtNY3qnctJ1UhMJoOVEoxrElsscWle071SNQGDoKHbPAB9FKBhy4ZAOA6YsdjGLX1f2SOwSz18dYPhmfdDBOPwshbrWJ2dkJtbWUCSK4GbuOt3ToWwNUIOWUEUIEKVmfl6ydmf6Jurvd6FmDAiom2ePMflrYYwx_SkdZH1yyOE3GYzglTds5V7Vy_mK7oDaGlCKOL9kE9Lyg3uvzgnpeUC8LFt-X_3zW5edyczRuetX9dXFjaf_RYdTJOixjDy6izaUe90rCX7E6utE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10368 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_112883 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_111284 crossref_primary_10_1038_s42003_024_07275_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10722_022_01384_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_3618 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4125525 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2021_801250 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14307 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2022_106806 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107747 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11040575 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10020201 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13932 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14149 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12237_023_01284_w crossref_primary_10_3390_land13121992 crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_91_111628 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10653_022_01269_x crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14368 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115729 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12221 crossref_primary_10_1080_26395916_2022_2032358 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00495.x 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052 10.1111/rec.12378 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247 10.1126/science.1172460 10.1111/1365-2664.12518 10.1126/science.1214915 10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.252 10.1038/ncomms14163 10.1111/1365-2664.13061 10.1098/rspb.2017.2577 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009 10.1890/14-2402.1 10.1126/science.1228334 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507 10.1038/nature21071 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017 10.1111/rec.13011 10.1038/ncomms4906 10.21105/joss.00772 10.1002/jrsm.1424 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011 10.1038/ncomms11666 10.1038/nature25753 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 10.3389/fevo.2018.00123 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x 10.1126/sciadv.1701345 10.7717/peerj.3942 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Authors Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Authors – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 1XC VOOES DOA |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1872-7034 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161 oai_HAL_hal_03119373v1 10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362 S1470160X21000273 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29G 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 6I. 7-5 71M 8P~ AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAFWJ AAHBH AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATLK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO ABFNM ABFYP ABGRD ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ACRPL ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADQTV ADVLN AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFJKZ AFPKN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AKIFW AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLECG BLXMC BNPGV CS3 EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KCYFY KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OK1 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SES SEW SPCBC SSA SSH SSJ SSZ T5K ~02 ~G- AAYWO AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI AEUPX AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKYEP APXCP CITATION 7S9 L.6 1XC EFKBS VOOES |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-5879120fc419e6ff517be5e9cb89be020d82083c04d6573040473d00ab4890a93 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1470-160X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:59 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 28 06:28:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:44:48 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:32:43 EDT 2025 Sun Apr 06 06:53:06 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Achieved restoration index Activerestoration Remaining recovery Passive restoration Meta-analysis |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY license. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c489t-5879120fc419e6ff517be5e9cb89be020d82083c04d6573040473d00ab4890a93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8586-2202 0000-0002-3640-8134 0000-0001-8273-3758 0000-0001-9461-9215 0000-0002-0273-4142 0000-0003-2703-908X 0000-0001-8795-7806 0000-0001-6970-8304 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21000273 |
PQID | 2524239579 |
PQPubID | 24069 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03119373v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2524239579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2021 2021-04-00 20210401 2021-04 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: April 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Ecological indicators |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier |
References | Miller, Bestelmeyer (b0130) 2016; 24 Prach, Hobbs (b0155) 2008; 16 Viechtbauer (b0210) 2010; 36 Cole, Bhagwat, Willis (b0020) 2014; 5 Lüdecke (b0100) 2018; 3 R Core Team (b9000) 2019 Prach, Durigan, Fensessy, Overbeck, Torezan, Murphy (b0160) 2019; 27 Gann, McDonald, Walder (b0075) 2019; 27 Kuznetsova, Brockhoff, Christensen (b0090) 2017 Suding, Gross (b0190) 2006 Corlett (b0030) 2016; 31 Commission (b0055) 2018 United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). “New York Declaration on Forests” (UNDP, 2014, http://www.forestdeclaration.org/). Comín, Miranda, Sorando, Felipe-Lucia, Jiménez, Navarro, Macinnis-Ng (b0025) 2018; 55 Barral, Rey-Benayas, Meli, Meceira (b0005) 2015; 202 Bates, Mächler, Bolker, Walker (b0010) 2015; 87 Jaunatre, R., Buisson, E.? Muller, I., Morlon, H., Mesléard, F., Dutoit, T. 2013. New synthetic indicators to assess community resilience and restoration success. Ecol. Ind. 29, 468-477. Mench, Dellise, Bes, Marchand, Kolbas, Le Coustumer, Oustrière (b0120) 2018; 6 Craven, D. 2014. Asymmetric aspects of log response ratios (or please use response ratios in your figures!). https://dylancraven.weebly.com/blog/archives/10-2014. Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., O'Dea, R. E., Rutkowska, J., Yang, Y., Noble, D. W., & Senior, A. M. 2020. The Orchard Plot: Cultivating a ForestPlot for Use in Ecology, Evolution and Beyond. McDonald, Jonson, Dixon (b0105) 2018 Meli, Holl, Rey-Benayas, Jones, Jones, Montoya, Moreno-Mateos (b0115) 2017; 12 Bullock, Aronson, Newton, Pywell, Rey-Benayas (b0015) 2011; 26 Res. Synt. Met. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1424. Kaiser-Bunbury, Mougal, Whittington, Valentin, Gabriel, Olesen, Blüthgen (b0080) 2017; 542 Crouzeilles, Ferreira, Chazdon, Lindenmayer, Sansevero, Monteiro, Iribarrem, Latawiec, Strassburg (b0050) 2017; 3 Gurevitch, Koricheva, Nakagawa, Stewart (b0060) 2018; 555 Suding, K., Hobbs, R.J. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework Trends in ecology and evolution, 24, 271-279. Cristofoli, Piqueray, Dufrêne, Bizoux, Mahy (b0040) 2010; 18 Benayas, Newton, Diaz, Bullock (b0175) 2009; 325 Smith, Diaz, Winder (b0185) 2017; 5 Moreno-Mateos, Barbier, Jones, Jones, Aronson, López-López, McCrackin, Meli, Montoya, Rey Benayas (b0145) 2017; 8 Pocock, Evans, Memott (b0165) 2012; 335 Lajeunesse (b0095) 2015; 96 Moreno-Mateos, Meli, Vara-Rodríguez, Aronson, Strecker (b0140) 2015; 52 Koricheva, Gurevitch (b0085) 2013 Possingham, Bode, Klein, Mace (b0170) 2015; 13 United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP). “UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration 2021 – 2030” (UNEP, 2019, http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly-decisions). Crouzeilles, Curran, Ferreira, Lindenmayer, Grelle, Rey Benayas (b0045) 2016; 7 Moreno-Mateos, Power, Comín, Yockteng, Loreau (b0135) 2012; 10 Meli, Rey Benayas, Balvanera, Martínez Ramos, Hajibabaei (b0110) 2014; 9 Rey Benayas, Barral, Meli (b0180) 2017; 27 Menz, Dixon, Hobbs (b0125) 2013; 339 Jones, Jones, Barbier, Blackburn, Rey Benayas, Holl, McCrackin, Meli, Montoya, Mateos (b0070) 2018; 285 Bates (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0010) 2015; 87 Comín (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0025) 2018; 55 Cole (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0020) 2014; 5 Jones (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0070) 2018; 285 Lajeunesse (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0095) 2015; 96 Barral (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0005) 2015; 202 McDonald (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0105) 2018 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0035 Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0140) 2015; 52 Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0135) 2012; 10 Prach (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0160) 2019; 27 Pocock (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0165) 2012; 335 Rey Benayas (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0180) 2017; 27 Corlett (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0030) 2016; 31 Miller (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0130) 2016; 24 Bullock (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0015) 2011; 26 Commission (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0055) 2018 Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0145) 2017; 8 Meli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0110) 2014; 9 Kuznetsova (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0090) 2017 Mench (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0120) 2018; 6 Possingham (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0170) 2015; 13 Crouzeilles (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0050) 2017; 3 Gann (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0075) 2019; 27 Viechtbauer (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0210) 2010; 36 Benayas (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0175) 2009; 325 Crouzeilles (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0045) 2016; 7 Gurevitch (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0060) 2018; 555 Suding (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0190) 2006 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0195 Cristofoli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0040) 2010; 18 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0150 Kaiser-Bunbury (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0080) 2017; 542 Lüdecke (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0100) 2018; 3 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0200 Meli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0115) 2017; 12 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0065 Koricheva (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0085) 2013 Smith (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0185) 2017; 5 Menz (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0125) 2013; 339 Prach (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0155) 2008; 16 R Core Team (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b9000) 2019 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0205 |
References_xml | – volume: 27 start-page: 193 year: 2017 end-page: 198 ident: b0180 article-title: Lecciones de cuatro meta-análisis globales sobre la restauración de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos publication-title: Ecol. Austral – reference: Craven, D. 2014. Asymmetric aspects of log response ratios (or please use response ratios in your figures!). https://dylancraven.weebly.com/blog/archives/10-2014. – volume: 87 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 48 ident: b0010 article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. – volume: 555 start-page: 175 year: 2018 end-page: 182 ident: b0060 article-title: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis publication-title: Nature – start-page: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 13 ident: b0085 article-title: Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 27 start-page: 41 year: 2019 end-page: 46 ident: b0075 article-title: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration publication-title: Second edition. Rest. Ecol. – volume: 8 year: 2017 ident: b0145 article-title: Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt publication-title: Nat. Commun. – volume: 27 start-page: 917 year: 2019 end-page: 923 ident: b0160 article-title: A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success publication-title: Rest. Ecol. – volume: 285 start-page: 20172577 year: 2018 ident: b0070 article-title: Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B. – volume: 5 year: 2017 ident: b0185 article-title: Grassland habitat restoration: lessons learnt from long term monitoring of Swanworth Quarry, UK, 1997–2014 publication-title: PeerJ – reference: United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP). “UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration 2021 – 2030” (UNEP, 2019, http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly-decisions). – volume: 202 start-page: 223 year: 2015 end-page: 231 ident: b0005 article-title: Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis publication-title: Agric. Ecosys. Environ. – reference: Jaunatre, R., Buisson, E.? Muller, I., Morlon, H., Mesléard, F., Dutoit, T. 2013. New synthetic indicators to assess community resilience and restoration success. Ecol. Ind. 29, 468-477. – volume: 52 start-page: 1528 year: 2015 end-page: 1537 ident: b0140 article-title: Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – volume: 16 start-page: 363 year: 2008 end-page: 366 ident: b0155 article-title: Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites publication-title: Rest. Ecol. – year: 2019 ident: b9000 article-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing – volume: 325 start-page: 1121 year: 2009 end-page: 1124 ident: b0175 article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: Science – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 48 ident: b0210 article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package publication-title: J. stat. soft. – volume: 24 start-page: 577 year: 2016 end-page: 582 ident: b0130 article-title: What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?: What's wrong with novel ecosystems publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – year: 2018 ident: b0055 article-title: Commission proposal for Horizon Europe, the next EU research & innovation programme (2021–2027) Annex - 6 – Horizon Europe cluster 6: Food, bioeconomy, natural resources publication-title: Agric. Environ. – year: 2018 ident: b0105 article-title: National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia publication-title: Standards Reference Group – volume: 339 start-page: 526 year: 2013 end-page: 527 ident: b0125 article-title: Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration publication-title: Science – volume: 7 start-page: e11666 year: 2016 ident: b0045 article-title: A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success publication-title: Nat. Commun. – volume: 542 start-page: 223 year: 2017 end-page: 227 ident: b0080 article-title: Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function publication-title: Nature – volume: 10 start-page: e1001247 year: 2012 ident: b0135 article-title: Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems publication-title: PLoS Biol. – volume: 5 start-page: 3906 year: 2014 ident: b0020 article-title: Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance publication-title: Nat. Comm. – start-page: 364 year: 2006 ident: b0190 article-title: The Dynamic Nature of Ecological Systems: Multiple States and Restoration trajectories publication-title: Foundations of Restoration EcologySociety for Ecological Restoration International – reference: Suding, K., Hobbs, R.J. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework Trends in ecology and evolution, 24, 271-279. – volume: 18 start-page: 645 year: 2010 end-page: 655 ident: b0040 article-title: Colonization credit in restored wet heathlands publication-title: Rest. Ecol. – volume: 9 start-page: e93507 year: 2014 ident: b0110 article-title: Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 3 start-page: e1701345 year: 2017 ident: b0050 article-title: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests publication-title: Sci. Adv. – volume: 55 start-page: 1155 year: 2018 end-page: 1163 ident: b0025 article-title: Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – volume: 96 start-page: 2056 year: 2015 end-page: 2063 ident: b0095 article-title: Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis publication-title: Ecology – volume: 13 start-page: e1002052 year: 2015 ident: b0170 article-title: Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection publication-title: PLoS Biol – volume: 26 start-page: 541 year: 2011 end-page: 549 ident: b0015 article-title: Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. – volume: 31 start-page: 453 year: 2016 end-page: 462 ident: b0030 article-title: Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. – reference: Res. Synt. Met. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1424. – volume: 3 start-page: 772 year: 2018 ident: b0100 article-title: ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models publication-title: JOSS – volume: 12 year: 2017 ident: b0115 article-title: Aglobal review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery publication-title: PLoS ONE – reference: United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). “New York Declaration on Forests” (UNDP, 2014, http://www.forestdeclaration.org/). – year: 2017 ident: b0090 article-title: lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models publication-title: J. stat. soft. – volume: 335 start-page: 973 year: 2012 end-page: 977 ident: b0165 article-title: The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks publication-title: Science – reference: Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., O'Dea, R. E., Rutkowska, J., Yang, Y., Noble, D. W., & Senior, A. M. 2020. The Orchard Plot: Cultivating a ForestPlot for Use in Ecology, Evolution and Beyond. – volume: 6 year: 2018 ident: b0120 article-title: Phytomanagement and Remediation of Cu-Contaminated Soils by High Yielding Crops at a Former Wood Preservation Site: Sunflower Biomass and Ionome publication-title: Front. Ecol. Evol. – volume: 18 start-page: 645 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0040 article-title: Colonization credit in restored wet heathlands publication-title: Rest. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00495.x – volume: 13 start-page: e1002052 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0170 article-title: Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection publication-title: PLoS Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0200 – volume: 24 start-page: 577 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0130 article-title: What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?: What's wrong with novel ecosystems publication-title: Restor. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/rec.12378 – volume: 10 start-page: e1001247 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0135 article-title: Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems publication-title: PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247 – volume: 325 start-page: 1121 issue: 5944 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0175 article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1172460 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0105 article-title: National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia – volume: 52 start-page: 1528 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0140 article-title: Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12518 – volume: 335 start-page: 973 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0165 article-title: The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1214915 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0195 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0065 – volume: 27 start-page: 193 issue: 1bis year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0180 article-title: Lecciones de cuatro meta-análisis globales sobre la restauración de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos publication-title: Ecol. Austral doi: 10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.252 – volume: 8 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0145 article-title: Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt publication-title: Nat. Commun. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14163 – volume: 55 start-page: 1155 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0025 article-title: Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13061 – volume: 285 start-page: 20172577 issue: 1873 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0070 article-title: Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2577 – volume: 12 issue: e0171368 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0115 article-title: Aglobal review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 202 start-page: 223 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0005 article-title: Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis publication-title: Agric. Ecosys. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009 – volume: 87 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0010 article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. – volume: 96 start-page: 2056 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0095 article-title: Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis publication-title: Ecology doi: 10.1890/14-2402.1 – volume: 339 start-page: 526 issue: 6119 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0125 article-title: Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1228334 – start-page: 364 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0190 article-title: The Dynamic Nature of Ecological Systems: Multiple States and Restoration trajectories – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b9000 – volume: 9 start-page: e93507 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0110 article-title: Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507 – volume: 542 start-page: 223 issue: 7640 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0080 article-title: Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature21071 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0035 – volume: 31 start-page: 453 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0030 article-title: Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017 – volume: 27 start-page: 917 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0160 article-title: A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success publication-title: Rest. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/rec.13011 – volume: 5 start-page: 3906 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0020 article-title: Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance publication-title: Nat. Comm. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4906 – volume: 3 start-page: 772 issue: 26 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0100 article-title: ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models publication-title: JOSS doi: 10.21105/joss.00772 – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0150 doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1424 – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0210 article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package publication-title: J. stat. soft. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 – volume: 26 start-page: 541 issue: 10 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0015 article-title: Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011 – volume: 7 start-page: e11666 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0045 article-title: A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success publication-title: Nat. Commun. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11666 – volume: 27 start-page: 41 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0075 article-title: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration publication-title: Second edition. Rest. Ecol. – volume: 555 start-page: 175 issue: 7695 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0060 article-title: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature25753 – year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0090 article-title: lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models publication-title: J. stat. soft. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 – volume: 6 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0120 article-title: Phytomanagement and Remediation of Cu-Contaminated Soils by High Yielding Crops at a Former Wood Preservation Site: Sunflower Biomass and Ionome publication-title: Front. Ecol. Evol. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00123 – volume: 16 start-page: 363 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0155 article-title: Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites publication-title: Rest. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0055 article-title: Commission proposal for Horizon Europe, the next EU research & innovation programme (2021–2027) Annex - 6 – Horizon Europe cluster 6: Food, bioeconomy, natural resources publication-title: Agric. Environ. – ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0205 – volume: 3 start-page: e1701345 issue: 11 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0050 article-title: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests publication-title: Sci. Adv. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701345 – volume: 5 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0185 article-title: Grassland habitat restoration: lessons learnt from long term monitoring of Swanworth Quarry, UK, 1997–2014 publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.3942 – start-page: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0085 |
SSID | ssj0016996 |
Score | 2.4408839 |
Snippet | •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in... Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the... |
SourceID | doaj hal proquest crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 107362 |
SubjectTerms | Achieved restoration index Activerestoration ecological restoration Environmental Sciences indigenous species invasive species Life Sciences Meta-analysis Passive restoration Remaining recovery species richness |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELaAiQXxFOUlg1gDTmIn8QgVqELABFI3y6_wEEoRbfn93NlJS1m6sDo5x7mH_Z1sf0fIuXW50eAISamNTriobGJKyZKa1-DSqbU20C4-PBaDZ343FMNfpb7wTFikB46Ku7QW6UEKrkGWi8wZoSFt8AgDIExj4gNrXpdMtfsHhZTxXlHJkrRgw_ndncv3C8jrAMIhTWiWQluZF9nCqhTI-xcWp9VXPCX5Z7IOK9DtJtlooSO9ikPeIiu-2SZ7N_ObavCwDdXxDhn244XEKbTqxtFYKrqb6mjQ95i-NRRpNhC2Ni8UwCAdT0MJRTqqqbez179CAZpgxV3yfHvz1B8kbRmFxPJKThJRlTLNWG15Kn1R1yItjRdeWlNJ4wEuOkABVW4Zd4WAgOeMl7ljTBsQZ1rme2StGTV-n1CQ0GnqCgsm4blnmpvcoTWscZBj1z3COzUq23KMY6mLD9UdJntXrfYVal9F7ffIxUzsM5JsLBO4RhvNXkaO7NAAnqNaz1HLPKdHqs7CqoUbEUZAV2_Lvn8GHrHw-cHVvcI2mCQBE5f5N_R_2jmMgpjFjRjd-NF0rDKBg8AN0oP_-JFDso5ji-eJjsja5GvqjwEqTcxJiIof5poNqw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524239579 https://hal.science/hal-03119373 https://doaj.org/article/cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161 |
Volume | 123 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9sgEEbb7aWXqq9V00dEq16dgAFjjmm0q_S1l3al3BBgvM2qclZ59Njf3hmws0ovK_XoMdhoGIYPe-YbQj6ERngHhlBo510hVR0Krw0rWtmCSfMQQqJd_HZZLa7k56VanpD5kAuDYZW9788-PXnrXjLttTm9Xa2m37nUSI-2LHlmZcEMdqnRyid_DmEevDImZxhpVmDruyye6c0ETngA5pAwtOQg06Iqj_anRON_tE09-Inxkv-47bQXXTwhj3sQSWd5nE_JSeyekbPzu5w1uNkv2u1zspzn1MQ9SF3X0Fw0enB6NGl-S1cdRcINBLDdNQVYSLf7VEyRrlsaw6H5JpWiSfP5glxdnP-YL4q-oEIRZG12haq14SVrg-QmVm2ruPZRRRN8bXwE4NgAHqhFYLKpFCx9yaQWDWPOQ3fmjDgjp926iy8JhR6O86YKAvZ3EZmTXjRlFcvgGzhttyMiBzXa0LONY9GLX3YIK7uxvfYtat9m7Y_I5NDtNtNt3NfhI87RoTGyZSfBenNte3OxISDFTCUd2J9UZeOVYzhWgJLg6is-IvUww_bI-OBRq_ve_x4s4uj1i9lXizJwl4COtfgNz383GIyF1Yu_ZFwX1_utLRUOAn-Vvvr_Mbwmj_AqxxO9Iae7zT6-Bai08-O0Fsbk4ezTl8XlOH1w-AsNTRM7 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKOcAF8aoIT4PguInt9b4OHEppldK0F1opN-PXtqnQpsomIC78Kf4gM15vqnCphNTr7HrXGo9nPssz3xDy3rrUaDCEpNBGJzIrbWKKiiW1rMGkubU20C4en-TjM_llmk23yJ--FgbTKqPv73x68NZRMoraHF3NZqOvXBZIjzYVvGNliZmVR_7XTzi3tR8PP8MifxDiYP90b5zE1gKJlWW1TLKyqLhgtZW88nldZ7wwPvOVNWVlPEAoB5GxTC2TLs9gE0gmi9Qxpg0MZxoZmMDv35XgLrBtwvD3Oq-E51XVlTQVLMHpXZcNjS6HcKQE9IgMpYKDrEhzsREQQ9-Ajbh45wITNP-JEyH4HTwkDyJqpbudYh6RLd88Jjv710Vy8DB6ifYJme51tZArkOrG0a5Lde9laVjqls4aigwfiJibcwo4lLar0L2Rzmvq7fr1Reh9EwzoKTm7FTXvkO1m3vhnhMIIzbnLbQqAIvVMS5M6kXthjYPjfT0gslejspHeHLtsfFd9HtulitpXqH3VaX9AhuthVx2_x00DPuEarV9Geu4gmC_OVbRPZS1y2uRSg8HLTDiTaYZzBewKsSXnA1L2K6w2rB0-Nbvp_-_AIjZ-P96dKJSBfwY4XqQ_4Ptve4NR4C7wDkg3fr5qlchwEng3-_z_5_CG3BufHk_U5PDk6AW5j0-6ZKaXZHu5WPlXgNOW5nXYF5R8u-2N-Bd_oUve |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conceptual+and+methodological+issues+in+estimating+the+success+of+ecological+restoration&rft.jtitle=Ecological+indicators&rft.au=Marchand%2C+Lilian&rft.au=Castagneyrol%2C+Bastien&rft.au=Jim%C3%A9nez%2C+Juan+J.&rft.au=Rey+Benayas%2C+Jose+M.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1470-160X&rft.volume=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ecolind.2021.107362&rft.externalDocID=S1470160X21000273 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon |