Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration

•Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here. Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcological indicators Vol. 123; p. 107362
Main Authors Marchand, Lilian, Castagneyrol, Bastien, Jiménez, Juan J., Rey Benayas, Jose M., Benot, Marie-Lise, Martínez-Ruiz, Carolina, Alday, Josu G., Jaunatre, Renaud, Dutoit, Thierry, Buisson, Elise, Mench, Michel, Alard, Didier, Corcket, Emmanuel, Comin, Francisco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here. Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR).
AbstractList •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in these calculations.•An explanatory index (the achieved recovery index) is provided here. Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR).
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by novel index informing on 'what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered': the 'Achieved Restoration' index (AR).
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER⁺), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER⁻). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR).
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the diversity of objectives pursued, actions undertaken but also statistical methods for treating data. We demonstrate here that, due to the heterogeneity of collected data, the success of restoration actions can be overestimated in meta-analyses. We advocate analyzing distinctly two types of actions in ER, those aiming at increasing an ecosystem attribute (e.g. species richness of a native plant species, ER+), and those aiming at decreasing it (e.g. invasive species cover, ER-). We also suggest that only one index for assessing the success of a restoration action is not enough. We propose here to complete RR (Remaining Recovery) by a novel index informing on ‘what has been restored by comparison to what should have been recovered’: the ‘Achieved Restoration’ index (AR).
ArticleNumber 107362
Author Corcket, Emmanuel
Comin, Francisco
Rey Benayas, Jose M.
Buisson, Elise
Martínez-Ruiz, Carolina
Castagneyrol, Bastien
Alday, Josu G.
Jaunatre, Renaud
Mench, Michel
Alard, Didier
Marchand, Lilian
Dutoit, Thierry
Jiménez, Juan J.
Benot, Marie-Lise
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lilian
  surname: Marchand
  fullname: Marchand, Lilian
  email: lilian.marchand@suez.com
  organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bastien
  surname: Castagneyrol
  fullname: Castagneyrol, Bastien
  organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Juan J.
  surname: Jiménez
  fullname: Jiménez, Juan J.
  organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jose M.
  surname: Rey Benayas
  fullname: Rey Benayas, Jose M.
  organization: Life Sciences Department, Alcala University, E-28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Marie-Lise
  surname: Benot
  fullname: Benot, Marie-Lise
  organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Carolina
  surname: Martínez-Ruiz
  fullname: Martínez-Ruiz, Carolina
  organization: Agroforestry Sciences Department, University of Valladolid, Campus La Yutera, Avda. de Madrid 50, 34071 Palencia, Spain
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Josu G.
  surname: Alday
  fullname: Alday, Josu G.
  organization: Joint Research Unit CTFC - AGROTECNIO, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E25198 Lleida, Spain
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Renaud
  surname: Jaunatre
  fullname: Jaunatre, Renaud
  organization: Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, F-38402 St-Martin-d'Hères, France
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Thierry
  surname: Dutoit
  fullname: Dutoit, Thierry
  organization: Univ. Avignon. Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE). UMR CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université, IUT site Agroparc, 337 Chemin des Meinajaries BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon cedex 09, France
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Elise
  surname: Buisson
  fullname: Buisson, Elise
  organization: Univ. Avignon. Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE). UMR CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université, IUT site Agroparc, 337 Chemin des Meinajaries BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon cedex 09, France
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Michel
  surname: Mench
  fullname: Mench, Michel
  organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Didier
  surname: Alard
  fullname: Alard, Didier
  organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Emmanuel
  surname: Corcket
  fullname: Corcket, Emmanuel
  organization: Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, Bat B2, Allée G. St-Hilaire, CS50023, FR-33615, Pessac Cedex, France
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Francisco
  surname: Comin
  fullname: Comin, Francisco
  organization: Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza/Av. Ntra. Sra. de la Victoria 16, 22700 Jaca, Huesca, Spain
BackLink https://hal.science/hal-03119373$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNqFkU1r3DAYhE1JoUnan1DwsT148-rDkkUPJSxtE1jopYXchCy_3tXilbaSNpB_XzleAu0lJ4nhmZGYuaoufPBYVR8JrAgQcbNfoQ2T88OKAiVFk0zQN9Ul6SRtJDB-Ue5cQkMEPLyrrlLaQ_EpJS6rh3XwFo_5ZKba-KE-YN6FIUxh62yRXEonTLXzNabsDiY7v63zDut0shZTqsNYz4-f8VioEAsV_Pvq7WimhB_O53X1-_u3X-u7ZvPzx_36dtNY3qnctJ1UhMJoOVEoxrElsscWle071SNQGDoKHbPAB9FKBhy4ZAOA6YsdjGLX1f2SOwSz18dYPhmfdDBOPwshbrWJ2dkJtbWUCSK4GbuOt3ToWwNUIOWUEUIEKVmfl6ydmf6Jurvd6FmDAiom2ePMflrYYwx_SkdZH1yyOE3GYzglTds5V7Vy_mK7oDaGlCKOL9kE9Lyg3uvzgnpeUC8LFt-X_3zW5edyczRuetX9dXFjaf_RYdTJOixjDy6izaUe90rCX7E6utE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10368
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_112883
crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13046
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_111284
crossref_primary_10_1038_s42003_024_07275_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10722_022_01384_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_3618
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4125525
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2021_801250
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14307
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2022_106806
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107747
crossref_primary_10_3390_land11040575
crossref_primary_10_3390_land10020201
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13932
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14149
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12237_023_01284_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_land13121992
crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_91_111628
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10653_022_01269_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14368
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115729
crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12221
crossref_primary_10_1080_26395916_2022_2032358
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00495.x
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052
10.1111/rec.12378
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247
10.1126/science.1172460
10.1111/1365-2664.12518
10.1126/science.1214915
10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.252
10.1038/ncomms14163
10.1111/1365-2664.13061
10.1098/rspb.2017.2577
10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
10.1890/14-2402.1
10.1126/science.1228334
10.1371/journal.pone.0093507
10.1038/nature21071
10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017
10.1111/rec.13011
10.1038/ncomms4906
10.21105/joss.00772
10.1002/jrsm.1424
10.18637/jss.v036.i03
10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
10.1038/ncomms11666
10.1038/nature25753
10.18637/jss.v082.i13
10.3389/fevo.2018.00123
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x
10.1126/sciadv.1701345
10.7717/peerj.3942
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
1XC
VOOES
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

AGRICOLA

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1872-7034
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161
oai_HAL_hal_03119373v1
10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362
S1470160X21000273
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29G
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATLK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABFYP
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACRLP
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADQTV
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AFJKZ
AFPKN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AKIFW
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KCYFY
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK1
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSA
SSH
SSJ
SSZ
T5K
~02
~G-
AAYWO
AAYXX
ACVFH
ADCNI
AEUPX
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKYEP
APXCP
CITATION
7S9
L.6
1XC
EFKBS
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-5879120fc419e6ff517be5e9cb89be020d82083c04d6573040473d00ab4890a93
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1470-160X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:59 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 28 06:28:53 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:44:48 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:32:43 EDT 2025
Sun Apr 06 06:53:06 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Achieved restoration index
Activerestoration
Remaining recovery
Passive restoration
Meta-analysis
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c489t-5879120fc419e6ff517be5e9cb89be020d82083c04d6573040473d00ab4890a93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-8586-2202
0000-0002-3640-8134
0000-0001-8273-3758
0000-0001-9461-9215
0000-0002-0273-4142
0000-0003-2703-908X
0000-0001-8795-7806
0000-0001-6970-8304
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21000273
PQID 2524239579
PQPubID 24069
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03119373v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2524239579
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ecolind_2021_107362
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2021
2021-04-00
20210401
2021-04
2021-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2021
  text: April 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Ecological indicators
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier
References Miller, Bestelmeyer (b0130) 2016; 24
Prach, Hobbs (b0155) 2008; 16
Viechtbauer (b0210) 2010; 36
Cole, Bhagwat, Willis (b0020) 2014; 5
Lüdecke (b0100) 2018; 3
R Core Team (b9000) 2019
Prach, Durigan, Fensessy, Overbeck, Torezan, Murphy (b0160) 2019; 27
Gann, McDonald, Walder (b0075) 2019; 27
Kuznetsova, Brockhoff, Christensen (b0090) 2017
Suding, Gross (b0190) 2006
Corlett (b0030) 2016; 31
Commission (b0055) 2018
United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). “New York Declaration on Forests” (UNDP, 2014, http://www.forestdeclaration.org/).
Comín, Miranda, Sorando, Felipe-Lucia, Jiménez, Navarro, Macinnis-Ng (b0025) 2018; 55
Barral, Rey-Benayas, Meli, Meceira (b0005) 2015; 202
Bates, Mächler, Bolker, Walker (b0010) 2015; 87
Jaunatre, R., Buisson, E.? Muller, I., Morlon, H., Mesléard, F., Dutoit, T. 2013. New synthetic indicators to assess community resilience and restoration success. Ecol. Ind. 29, 468-477.
Mench, Dellise, Bes, Marchand, Kolbas, Le Coustumer, Oustrière (b0120) 2018; 6
Craven, D. 2014. Asymmetric aspects of log response ratios (or please use response ratios in your figures!). https://dylancraven.weebly.com/blog/archives/10-2014.
Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., O'Dea, R. E., Rutkowska, J., Yang, Y., Noble, D. W., & Senior, A. M. 2020. The Orchard Plot: Cultivating a ForestPlot for Use in Ecology, Evolution and Beyond.
McDonald, Jonson, Dixon (b0105) 2018
Meli, Holl, Rey-Benayas, Jones, Jones, Montoya, Moreno-Mateos (b0115) 2017; 12
Bullock, Aronson, Newton, Pywell, Rey-Benayas (b0015) 2011; 26
Res. Synt. Met. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1424.
Kaiser-Bunbury, Mougal, Whittington, Valentin, Gabriel, Olesen, Blüthgen (b0080) 2017; 542
Crouzeilles, Ferreira, Chazdon, Lindenmayer, Sansevero, Monteiro, Iribarrem, Latawiec, Strassburg (b0050) 2017; 3
Gurevitch, Koricheva, Nakagawa, Stewart (b0060) 2018; 555
Suding, K., Hobbs, R.J. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework Trends in ecology and evolution, 24, 271-279.
Cristofoli, Piqueray, Dufrêne, Bizoux, Mahy (b0040) 2010; 18
Benayas, Newton, Diaz, Bullock (b0175) 2009; 325
Smith, Diaz, Winder (b0185) 2017; 5
Moreno-Mateos, Barbier, Jones, Jones, Aronson, López-López, McCrackin, Meli, Montoya, Rey Benayas (b0145) 2017; 8
Pocock, Evans, Memott (b0165) 2012; 335
Lajeunesse (b0095) 2015; 96
Moreno-Mateos, Meli, Vara-Rodríguez, Aronson, Strecker (b0140) 2015; 52
Koricheva, Gurevitch (b0085) 2013
Possingham, Bode, Klein, Mace (b0170) 2015; 13
United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP). “UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration 2021 – 2030” (UNEP, 2019, http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly-decisions).
Crouzeilles, Curran, Ferreira, Lindenmayer, Grelle, Rey Benayas (b0045) 2016; 7
Moreno-Mateos, Power, Comín, Yockteng, Loreau (b0135) 2012; 10
Meli, Rey Benayas, Balvanera, Martínez Ramos, Hajibabaei (b0110) 2014; 9
Rey Benayas, Barral, Meli (b0180) 2017; 27
Menz, Dixon, Hobbs (b0125) 2013; 339
Jones, Jones, Barbier, Blackburn, Rey Benayas, Holl, McCrackin, Meli, Montoya, Mateos (b0070) 2018; 285
Bates (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0010) 2015; 87
Comín (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0025) 2018; 55
Cole (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0020) 2014; 5
Jones (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0070) 2018; 285
Lajeunesse (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0095) 2015; 96
Barral (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0005) 2015; 202
McDonald (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0105) 2018
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0035
Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0140) 2015; 52
Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0135) 2012; 10
Prach (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0160) 2019; 27
Pocock (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0165) 2012; 335
Rey Benayas (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0180) 2017; 27
Corlett (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0030) 2016; 31
Miller (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0130) 2016; 24
Bullock (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0015) 2011; 26
Commission (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0055) 2018
Moreno-Mateos (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0145) 2017; 8
Meli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0110) 2014; 9
Kuznetsova (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0090) 2017
Mench (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0120) 2018; 6
Possingham (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0170) 2015; 13
Crouzeilles (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0050) 2017; 3
Gann (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0075) 2019; 27
Viechtbauer (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0210) 2010; 36
Benayas (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0175) 2009; 325
Crouzeilles (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0045) 2016; 7
Gurevitch (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0060) 2018; 555
Suding (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0190) 2006
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0195
Cristofoli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0040) 2010; 18
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0150
Kaiser-Bunbury (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0080) 2017; 542
Lüdecke (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0100) 2018; 3
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0200
Meli (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0115) 2017; 12
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0065
Koricheva (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0085) 2013
Smith (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0185) 2017; 5
Menz (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0125) 2013; 339
Prach (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0155) 2008; 16
R Core Team (10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b9000) 2019
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0205
References_xml – volume: 27
  start-page: 193
  year: 2017
  end-page: 198
  ident: b0180
  article-title: Lecciones de cuatro meta-análisis globales sobre la restauración de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos
  publication-title: Ecol. Austral
– reference: Craven, D. 2014. Asymmetric aspects of log response ratios (or please use response ratios in your figures!). https://dylancraven.weebly.com/blog/archives/10-2014.
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 48
  ident: b0010
  article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
  publication-title: J. Stat. Softw.
– volume: 555
  start-page: 175
  year: 2018
  end-page: 182
  ident: b0060
  article-title: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
  publication-title: Nature
– start-page: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 13
  ident: b0085
  article-title: Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 27
  start-page: 41
  year: 2019
  end-page: 46
  ident: b0075
  article-title: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration
  publication-title: Second edition. Rest. Ecol.
– volume: 8
  year: 2017
  ident: b0145
  article-title: Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt
  publication-title: Nat. Commun.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 917
  year: 2019
  end-page: 923
  ident: b0160
  article-title: A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
– volume: 285
  start-page: 20172577
  year: 2018
  ident: b0070
  article-title: Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems
  publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B.
– volume: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: b0185
  article-title: Grassland habitat restoration: lessons learnt from long term monitoring of Swanworth Quarry, UK, 1997–2014
  publication-title: PeerJ
– reference: United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP). “UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration 2021 – 2030” (UNEP, 2019, http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly-decisions).
– volume: 202
  start-page: 223
  year: 2015
  end-page: 231
  ident: b0005
  article-title: Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis
  publication-title: Agric. Ecosys. Environ.
– reference: Jaunatre, R., Buisson, E.? Muller, I., Morlon, H., Mesléard, F., Dutoit, T. 2013. New synthetic indicators to assess community resilience and restoration success. Ecol. Ind. 29, 468-477.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1528
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1537
  ident: b0140
  article-title: Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 363
  year: 2008
  end-page: 366
  ident: b0155
  article-title: Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
– year: 2019
  ident: b9000
  article-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
– volume: 325
  start-page: 1121
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1124
  ident: b0175
  article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 48
  ident: b0210
  article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package
  publication-title: J. stat. soft.
– volume: 24
  start-page: 577
  year: 2016
  end-page: 582
  ident: b0130
  article-title: What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?: What's wrong with novel ecosystems
  publication-title: Restor. Ecol.
– year: 2018
  ident: b0055
  article-title: Commission proposal for Horizon Europe, the next EU research & innovation programme (2021–2027) Annex - 6 – Horizon Europe cluster 6: Food, bioeconomy, natural resources
  publication-title: Agric. Environ.
– year: 2018
  ident: b0105
  article-title: National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia
  publication-title: Standards Reference Group
– volume: 339
  start-page: 526
  year: 2013
  end-page: 527
  ident: b0125
  article-title: Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 7
  start-page: e11666
  year: 2016
  ident: b0045
  article-title: A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success
  publication-title: Nat. Commun.
– volume: 542
  start-page: 223
  year: 2017
  end-page: 227
  ident: b0080
  article-title: Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 10
  start-page: e1001247
  year: 2012
  ident: b0135
  article-title: Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems
  publication-title: PLoS Biol.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3906
  year: 2014
  ident: b0020
  article-title: Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance
  publication-title: Nat. Comm.
– start-page: 364
  year: 2006
  ident: b0190
  article-title: The Dynamic Nature of Ecological Systems: Multiple States and Restoration trajectories
  publication-title: Foundations of Restoration EcologySociety for Ecological Restoration International
– reference: Suding, K., Hobbs, R.J. 2009. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework Trends in ecology and evolution, 24, 271-279.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 645
  year: 2010
  end-page: 655
  ident: b0040
  article-title: Colonization credit in restored wet heathlands
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
– volume: 9
  start-page: e93507
  year: 2014
  ident: b0110
  article-title: Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 3
  start-page: e1701345
  year: 2017
  ident: b0050
  article-title: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests
  publication-title: Sci. Adv.
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1155
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1163
  ident: b0025
  article-title: Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 2056
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2063
  ident: b0095
  article-title: Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 13
  start-page: e1002052
  year: 2015
  ident: b0170
  article-title: Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection
  publication-title: PLoS Biol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 541
  year: 2011
  end-page: 549
  ident: b0015
  article-title: Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
  publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 453
  year: 2016
  end-page: 462
  ident: b0030
  article-title: Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World
  publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol.
– reference: Res. Synt. Met. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1424.
– volume: 3
  start-page: 772
  year: 2018
  ident: b0100
  article-title: ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models
  publication-title: JOSS
– volume: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: b0115
  article-title: Aglobal review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– reference: United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). “New York Declaration on Forests” (UNDP, 2014, http://www.forestdeclaration.org/).
– year: 2017
  ident: b0090
  article-title: lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
  publication-title: J. stat. soft.
– volume: 335
  start-page: 973
  year: 2012
  end-page: 977
  ident: b0165
  article-title: The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks
  publication-title: Science
– reference: Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., O'Dea, R. E., Rutkowska, J., Yang, Y., Noble, D. W., & Senior, A. M. 2020. The Orchard Plot: Cultivating a ForestPlot for Use in Ecology, Evolution and Beyond.
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: b0120
  article-title: Phytomanagement and Remediation of Cu-Contaminated Soils by High Yielding Crops at a Former Wood Preservation Site: Sunflower Biomass and Ionome
  publication-title: Front. Ecol. Evol.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 645
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0040
  article-title: Colonization credit in restored wet heathlands
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00495.x
– volume: 13
  start-page: e1002052
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0170
  article-title: Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection
  publication-title: PLoS Biol
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0200
– volume: 24
  start-page: 577
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0130
  article-title: What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?: What's wrong with novel ecosystems
  publication-title: Restor. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/rec.12378
– volume: 10
  start-page: e1001247
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0135
  article-title: Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems
  publication-title: PLoS Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247
– volume: 325
  start-page: 1121
  issue: 5944
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0175
  article-title: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1172460
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0105
  article-title: National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1528
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0140
  article-title: Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12518
– volume: 335
  start-page: 973
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0165
  article-title: The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1214915
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0195
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0065
– volume: 27
  start-page: 193
  issue: 1bis
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0180
  article-title: Lecciones de cuatro meta-análisis globales sobre la restauración de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos
  publication-title: Ecol. Austral
  doi: 10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.252
– volume: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0145
  article-title: Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt
  publication-title: Nat. Commun.
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms14163
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1155
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0025
  article-title: Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13061
– volume: 285
  start-page: 20172577
  issue: 1873
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0070
  article-title: Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems
  publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B.
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2577
– volume: 12
  issue: e0171368
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0115
  article-title: Aglobal review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 202
  start-page: 223
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0005
  article-title: Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis
  publication-title: Agric. Ecosys. Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0010
  article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
  publication-title: J. Stat. Softw.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 2056
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0095
  article-title: Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ecology
  doi: 10.1890/14-2402.1
– volume: 339
  start-page: 526
  issue: 6119
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0125
  article-title: Hurdles and Opportunities for Landscape-Scale Restoration
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1228334
– start-page: 364
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0190
  article-title: The Dynamic Nature of Ecological Systems: Multiple States and Restoration trajectories
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b9000
– volume: 9
  start-page: e93507
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0110
  article-title: Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507
– volume: 542
  start-page: 223
  issue: 7640
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0080
  article-title: Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature21071
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0035
– volume: 31
  start-page: 453
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0030
  article-title: Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World
  publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017
– volume: 27
  start-page: 917
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0160
  article-title: A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/rec.13011
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3906
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0020
  article-title: Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance
  publication-title: Nat. Comm.
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms4906
– volume: 3
  start-page: 772
  issue: 26
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0100
  article-title: ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models
  publication-title: JOSS
  doi: 10.21105/joss.00772
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0150
  doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1424
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0210
  article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package
  publication-title: J. stat. soft.
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
– volume: 26
  start-page: 541
  issue: 10
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0015
  article-title: Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
  publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
– volume: 7
  start-page: e11666
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0045
  article-title: A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success
  publication-title: Nat. Commun.
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms11666
– volume: 27
  start-page: 41
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0075
  article-title: International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration
  publication-title: Second edition. Rest. Ecol.
– volume: 555
  start-page: 175
  issue: 7695
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0060
  article-title: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature25753
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0090
  article-title: lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
  publication-title: J. stat. soft.
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0120
  article-title: Phytomanagement and Remediation of Cu-Contaminated Soils by High Yielding Crops at a Former Wood Preservation Site: Sunflower Biomass and Ionome
  publication-title: Front. Ecol. Evol.
  doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00123
– volume: 16
  start-page: 363
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0155
  article-title: Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites
  publication-title: Rest. Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00412.x
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0055
  article-title: Commission proposal for Horizon Europe, the next EU research & innovation programme (2021–2027) Annex - 6 – Horizon Europe cluster 6: Food, bioeconomy, natural resources
  publication-title: Agric. Environ.
– ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0205
– volume: 3
  start-page: e1701345
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0050
  article-title: Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests
  publication-title: Sci. Adv.
  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701345
– volume: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0185
  article-title: Grassland habitat restoration: lessons learnt from long term monitoring of Swanworth Quarry, UK, 1997–2014
  publication-title: PeerJ
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.3942
– start-page: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362_b0085
SSID ssj0016996
Score 2.4408839
Snippet •Success of restoration actions is often overestimated.•The calculation protocole when estimating it with meta-analysis is paramount.•Some biases exist in...
Ecological restoration (ER) of terrestrial ecosystems has become widespread in past decades. However, assessing its success is complex mainly due to the...
SourceID doaj
hal
proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 107362
SubjectTerms Achieved restoration index
Activerestoration
ecological restoration
Environmental Sciences
indigenous species
invasive species
Life Sciences
Meta-analysis
Passive restoration
Remaining recovery
species richness
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELaAiQXxFOUlg1gDTmIn8QgVqELABFI3y6_wEEoRbfn93NlJS1m6sDo5x7mH_Z1sf0fIuXW50eAISamNTriobGJKyZKa1-DSqbU20C4-PBaDZ343FMNfpb7wTFikB46Ku7QW6UEKrkGWi8wZoSFt8AgDIExj4gNrXpdMtfsHhZTxXlHJkrRgw_ndncv3C8jrAMIhTWiWQluZF9nCqhTI-xcWp9VXPCX5Z7IOK9DtJtlooSO9ikPeIiu-2SZ7N_ObavCwDdXxDhn244XEKbTqxtFYKrqb6mjQ95i-NRRpNhC2Ni8UwCAdT0MJRTqqqbez179CAZpgxV3yfHvz1B8kbRmFxPJKThJRlTLNWG15Kn1R1yItjRdeWlNJ4wEuOkABVW4Zd4WAgOeMl7ljTBsQZ1rme2StGTV-n1CQ0GnqCgsm4blnmpvcoTWscZBj1z3COzUq23KMY6mLD9UdJntXrfYVal9F7ffIxUzsM5JsLBO4RhvNXkaO7NAAnqNaz1HLPKdHqs7CqoUbEUZAV2_Lvn8GHrHw-cHVvcI2mCQBE5f5N_R_2jmMgpjFjRjd-NF0rDKBg8AN0oP_-JFDso5ji-eJjsja5GvqjwEqTcxJiIof5poNqw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524239579
https://hal.science/hal-03119373
https://doaj.org/article/cc236164af88452db5a026e242311161
Volume 123
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9sgEEbb7aWXqq9V00dEq16dgAFjjmm0q_S1l3al3BBgvM2qclZ59Njf3hmws0ovK_XoMdhoGIYPe-YbQj6ERngHhlBo510hVR0Krw0rWtmCSfMQQqJd_HZZLa7k56VanpD5kAuDYZW9788-PXnrXjLttTm9Xa2m37nUSI-2LHlmZcEMdqnRyid_DmEevDImZxhpVmDruyye6c0ETngA5pAwtOQg06Iqj_anRON_tE09-Inxkv-47bQXXTwhj3sQSWd5nE_JSeyekbPzu5w1uNkv2u1zspzn1MQ9SF3X0Fw0enB6NGl-S1cdRcINBLDdNQVYSLf7VEyRrlsaw6H5JpWiSfP5glxdnP-YL4q-oEIRZG12haq14SVrg-QmVm2ruPZRRRN8bXwE4NgAHqhFYLKpFCx9yaQWDWPOQ3fmjDgjp926iy8JhR6O86YKAvZ3EZmTXjRlFcvgGzhttyMiBzXa0LONY9GLX3YIK7uxvfYtat9m7Y_I5NDtNtNt3NfhI87RoTGyZSfBenNte3OxISDFTCUd2J9UZeOVYzhWgJLg6is-IvUww_bI-OBRq_ve_x4s4uj1i9lXizJwl4COtfgNz383GIyF1Yu_ZFwX1_utLRUOAn-Vvvr_Mbwmj_AqxxO9Iae7zT6-Bai08-O0Fsbk4ezTl8XlOH1w-AsNTRM7
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKOcAF8aoIT4PguInt9b4OHEppldK0F1opN-PXtqnQpsomIC78Kf4gM15vqnCphNTr7HrXGo9nPssz3xDy3rrUaDCEpNBGJzIrbWKKiiW1rMGkubU20C4en-TjM_llmk23yJ--FgbTKqPv73x68NZRMoraHF3NZqOvXBZIjzYVvGNliZmVR_7XTzi3tR8PP8MifxDiYP90b5zE1gKJlWW1TLKyqLhgtZW88nldZ7wwPvOVNWVlPEAoB5GxTC2TLs9gE0gmi9Qxpg0MZxoZmMDv35XgLrBtwvD3Oq-E51XVlTQVLMHpXZcNjS6HcKQE9IgMpYKDrEhzsREQQ9-Ajbh45wITNP-JEyH4HTwkDyJqpbudYh6RLd88Jjv710Vy8DB6ifYJme51tZArkOrG0a5Lde9laVjqls4aigwfiJibcwo4lLar0L2Rzmvq7fr1Reh9EwzoKTm7FTXvkO1m3vhnhMIIzbnLbQqAIvVMS5M6kXthjYPjfT0gslejspHeHLtsfFd9HtulitpXqH3VaX9AhuthVx2_x00DPuEarV9Geu4gmC_OVbRPZS1y2uRSg8HLTDiTaYZzBewKsSXnA1L2K6w2rB0-Nbvp_-_AIjZ-P96dKJSBfwY4XqQ_4Ptve4NR4C7wDkg3fr5qlchwEng3-_z_5_CG3BufHk_U5PDk6AW5j0-6ZKaXZHu5WPlXgNOW5nXYF5R8u-2N-Bd_oUve
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conceptual+and+methodological+issues+in+estimating+the+success+of+ecological+restoration&rft.jtitle=Ecological+indicators&rft.au=Marchand%2C+Lilian&rft.au=Castagneyrol%2C+Bastien&rft.au=Jim%C3%A9nez%2C+Juan+J.&rft.au=Rey+Benayas%2C+Jose+M.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1470-160X&rft.volume=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ecolind.2021.107362&rft.externalDocID=S1470160X21000273
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1470-160X&client=summon