Percutaneous Versus Surgical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insert...
Saved in:
Published in | Canadian journal of kidney health and disease Vol. 8; p. 20543581211052731 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
2021
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background:
Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes.
Objective:
To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Setting:
We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template.
Patients:
Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure.
Measurements:
We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up.
Methods:
Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Results:
Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques.
Limitations:
Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak).
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BACKGROUNDHome-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. OBJECTIVETo compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. DESIGNSystematic review and meta-analysis. SETTINGWe searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. PATIENTSAdult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. MEASUREMENTSWe analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. METHODSRandom effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTSTwenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. LIMITATIONSLack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). CONCLUSIONSOur meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. Patients: Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. Measurements: We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ 2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I 2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I 2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. Limitations: Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. Patients: Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. Measurements: We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ 2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I 2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I 2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. Limitations: Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. Patients: Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. Measurements: We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. Limitations: Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes. Objective: To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template. Patients: Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure. Measurements: We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up. Methods: Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques. Limitations: Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources. |
Author | Komenda, Paul Hu, Qiming Armstrong, Sean Dunsmore, Sara Bamforth, Ryan J. Tangri, Navdeep Sabourin, Jenna M. Ferguson, Thomas W. Agarwal, Anirudh Whitlock, Reid H. Rigatto, Claudio |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 2 Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada – name: 1 Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Anirudh surname: Agarwal fullname: Agarwal, Anirudh – sequence: 2 givenname: Reid H. orcidid: 0000-0002-7046-0358 surname: Whitlock fullname: Whitlock, Reid H. – sequence: 3 givenname: Ryan J. orcidid: 0000-0002-8316-2325 surname: Bamforth fullname: Bamforth, Ryan J. – sequence: 4 givenname: Thomas W. orcidid: 0000-0003-1058-943X surname: Ferguson fullname: Ferguson, Thomas W. – sequence: 5 givenname: Jenna M. surname: Sabourin fullname: Sabourin, Jenna M. – sequence: 6 givenname: Qiming surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Qiming – sequence: 7 givenname: Sean surname: Armstrong fullname: Armstrong, Sean – sequence: 8 givenname: Claudio orcidid: 0000-0002-8306-8072 surname: Rigatto fullname: Rigatto, Claudio – sequence: 9 givenname: Navdeep surname: Tangri fullname: Tangri, Navdeep – sequence: 10 givenname: Sara surname: Dunsmore fullname: Dunsmore, Sara – sequence: 11 givenname: Paul surname: Komenda fullname: Komenda, Paul email: pkomenda@sogh.mb.ca |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kl9vFCEUxSemxtbaD-CLIfHFl6nAwAA-mGzWf5vUaKz6ShjmzpbNLLTA1Oy3l3VqbTU-XXI458e95D6uDnzwUFVPCT4lRIiXFHPWcEkoIZhT0ZAH1dFeq_fiwZ3zYXWS0gZjTCjnQpFH1WHDhOIK86PKf4Zop2w8hCmh7xBTKedTXDtrRrTyCWJ2waMwoOJ0ufRQ9DfOjLvkElqafAG5pF6hBTrfpQxbk51FX-DawQ9kfI8-Qjb1ws-BJ9XDwYwJTm7qcfXt3duvyw_12af3q-XirLZMqlxTayhvcc-txWAVGNKBsYPtMe4NcGI5Y1R0uBMtk63APbatYBgktoApZc1xtZq5fTAbfRnd1sSdDsbpX0KIa23KYHYE3fSEdtgQMtCONV0niaXS9CAVHgbVysJ6PbMup24LvQWfoxnvQe_feHeh1-FaS64aqngBvLgBxHA1Qcp665KFcZx_XVOuFJENFfu-n_9l3YQpls8rrpY0lEnRtsVFZpeNIaUIw20zBOv9cuh_lqNknt2d4jbxexWK4XQ2JLOGP8_-n_gTd97EXA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_08968608231172740 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11111654 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13092618 crossref_primary_10_1111_1744_9987_14045 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0042_1758040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suc_2023_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1177_09636897241236576 crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_0000000000000276 crossref_primary_10_22141_2307_1257_11_2_2022_368 crossref_primary_10_22141_2307_1257_11_2_2022_366 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD012478_pub2 crossref_primary_10_5937_hpimj2401382B |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/nep.12621. 10.4103/1319-2442.144252. 10.5301/jva.2010.5774. 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.023. 10.1177/000313480507100209 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.05.006. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.038. 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.007. 10.3747/pdi.2017.00230. 10.1177/039139880302600213. 10.4103/0971-4065.163425. 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038. 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00621.x. 10.1177/089686080202200216 10.1093/ndt/gfp312. 10.1111/sdi.12147. 10.1503/cmaj.120833. 10.5301/jva.5000439. 10.1002/9780470386347 10.1097/00002480-199339030-00123 10.1371/journal.pone.0056351. 10.5262/tndt.2014.1003.02. 10.1186/1471-2369-13-69. 10.1136/bmj.l4898. 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62004-3. 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2000.tb00112.x. 10.1002/9780470712184 10.1002/sim.1186. 10.3109/00016925309136722. 10.1093/ndt/gfq142. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030. 10.1001/jama.291.6.697. 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2003.tb00294.x. 10.3747/pdi.2018.00232. 10.1093/ndt/16.9.1893. 10.1093/ndt/gfs305. 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90167-5. 10.1007/s00268-013-2346-5. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. 10.3747/pdi.2013.00003. 10.1177/089686089001000309 10.3747/pdi.2012.00160. 10.3747/pdi.2016.00120. |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 The Author(s) 2021. The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2021 2021 Canadian Society of Nephrology, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: The Author(s) 2021. – notice: The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2021 2021 Canadian Society of Nephrology, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses |
DBID | AFRWT NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88C 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FQ 8FV ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M0T PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1177/20543581211052731 |
DatabaseName | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库 ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central CBCA Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) CBCA Complete ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: AFRWT name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2054-3581 |
EndPage | 20543581211052731 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_3d12b0a11f2b43bb81c28ade890ff968 10_1177_20543581211052731 34795905 10.1177_20543581211052731 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: university of manitoba funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100010318 – fundername: ; |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 31X 3V. 54M 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ 8FQ AATBZ ABQXT ABUWG ABVFX ACARO ACGFS ACGZU ACRMQ ACROE ACSIQ ADBBV ADINQ ADOGD ADPDF ADRAZ ADUKV AEWDL AEWHI AFCOW AFGXO AFKRA AFKRG AFRWT AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIOMO AJUZI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS AQUVI ASPBG AUTPY AYAKG BAWUL BCNDV BDDNI BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU DC. DIK DV7 DWQXO EBS EJD EMOBN FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION HMCUK HYE J8X K.F KQ8 M0T M48 M~E O9- OK1 OVD OVEED PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC ROL RPM RSV SFC SFK SFT SGV SOJ SPP TEORI UKHRP H13 NPM PGMZT AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK AZQEC K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-2ca2560d5cc0ec9ea1beacfcd00dae51c54427b0b7648670d0c6740e80ce02243 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2054-3581 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 04 13:09:50 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:28:05 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 05:42:30 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 05:56:20 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 17:01:08 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:19:47 EDT 2024 Tue Jul 16 20:39:03 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | dialysis surgical catheter percutaneous peritoneal |
Language | English |
License | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). The Author(s) 2021. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c489t-2ca2560d5cc0ec9ea1beacfcd00dae51c54427b0b7648670d0c6740e80ce02243 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7046-0358 0000-0002-8316-2325 0000-0002-8306-8072 0000-0003-1058-943X |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593295/ |
PMID | 34795905 |
PQID | 2613248766 |
PQPubID | 2040156 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3d12b0a11f2b43bb81c28ade890ff968 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8593295 proquest_miscellaneous_2599183274 proquest_journals_2613248766 crossref_primary_10_1177_20543581211052731 pubmed_primary_34795905 sage_journals_10_1177_20543581211052731 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2021 text: 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Los Angeles, CA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Los Angeles, CA – name: England – name: London – name: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA |
PublicationTitle | Canadian journal of kidney health and disease |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Can J Kidney Health Dis |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd – name: SAGE Publishing |
References | Atapour, Asadabadi, Karimi, Eslami, Beigi 2011; 16 Roueff, Pagniez, Moranne 2002; 22 Voss, Hawkins, Poole, Marshall 2012; 27 Mellotte, Ho, Morgan, Bending, Eisinger 1993; 8 Tullavardhana, Akranurakkul, Ungkitphaiboon, Songtish 2016; 10 James, Hemmelgarn, Tonelli 2010; 375 Demiriz, Bulut, Gok Oguz 2014; 23 Park, Min, Kim 2014; 38 Shrestha, Shrestha, Kumar, Shrestha, Boyes, Wilkie 2018; 38 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, Group 2009; 151 Henderson, Brown, Levy 2009; 24 Singh, Davidson, Minhajuddin, Gieser, Nurenberg, Saxena 2010; 11 Sterne, Savovic, Page 2019; 366 Seldinger 1953; 39 Medani, Hussein, Shantier, Flynn, Wall, Mellotte 2015; 35 Liberek, Chmielewski, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko, Renke, Zadrozny, Rutkowski 2003; 26 Sivaramakrishnan, Gupta, Agarwal, Bhowmik, Mahajan 2016; 26 Al-Hwiesh 2014; 34 Gajjar, Rhoden, Kathuria, Kaul, Udupa, Jennings 2007; 194 Arora, Vasa, Brenner 2013; 185 Chula, Campos, de Alcantara, Riella, do Nascimento 2014; 27 Rosenthal, Yang, Liu 2008; 19 Sun, Voss, Beechey, Lam-Po-Tang 2016; 21 Amerling, Cruz 1993; 39 Xie, Zhang, Cheng, He 2012; 13 Higgins, Thompson 2002; 21 Hagen, Lafranca, Steyerberg, IJzermans, Dor 2013; 8 Crabtree, Shrestha, Chow 2019; 39 Khositrangsikun, Chujohn, Kanokkantapong, Kanjanabuch 2011; 94 Dequidt, Vijt, Veys, Van Biesen 2003; 29 Perakis, Stylianou, Kyriazis 2009; 22 Crabtree, Fishman 2005; 71 Szeto, Li, Johnson 2017; 37 Picó-Vicent, Cases, Picó-Mira, Contreras 2000; 26 Boujelbane, Fu, Chapla 2015; 16 Coresh, Selvin, Stevens 2007; 298 Swartz, Messana, Rocher, Reynolds, Starmann, Lees 1990; 10 Rubin, Fink, Plantinga, Sadler, Kliger, Powe 2004; 291 Al-Hwiesh 2014; 25 Goeree, Manalich, Grootendorst, Beecroft, Churchill 1995; 18 Maher, Wolley, Abbas, Hawkins, Marshall 2014; 25 Ozener, Bihorac, Akoglu 2001; 16 Rana, Cramp, Akoh 2011; 3 Morton, Snelling, Webster 2012; 60 Coyte, Young, Tipper 1996; 27 Brum, Rodrigues, Rocha 2010; 25 bibr31-20543581211052731 bibr6-20543581211052731 bibr44-20543581211052731 bibr29-20543581211052731 bibr24-20543581211052731 bibr11-20543581211052731 bibr16-20543581211052731 bibr1-20543581211052731 bibr49-20543581211052731 bibr23-20543581211052731 bibr36-20543581211052731 bibr7-20543581211052731 bibr17-20543581211052731 bibr30-20543581211052731 bibr37-20543581211052731 Mellotte G (bibr21-20543581211052731) 1993; 8 Goeree R (bibr4-20543581211052731) 1995; 18 bibr38-20543581211052731 bibr28-20543581211052731 bibr48-20543581211052731 bibr43-20543581211052731 bibr12-20543581211052731 bibr18-20543581211052731 bibr42-20543581211052731 bibr2-20543581211052731 bibr8-20543581211052731 bibr22-20543581211052731 bibr32-20543581211052731 bibr9-20543581211052731 bibr41-20543581211052731 bibr47-20543581211052731 bibr3-20543581211052731 bibr14-20543581211052731 bibr19-20543581211052731 bibr39-20543581211052731 bibr33-20543581211052731 bibr13-20543581211052731 bibr27-20543581211052731 bibr15-20543581211052731 bibr50-20543581211052731 bibr40-20543581211052731 Atapour A (bibr26-20543581211052731) 2011; 16 Rana T (bibr34-20543581211052731) 2011; 3 bibr46-20543581211052731 bibr45-20543581211052731 Khositrangsikun K (bibr20-20543581211052731) 2011; 94 bibr25-20543581211052731 bibr35-20543581211052731 bibr5-20543581211052731 |
References_xml | – volume: 27 issue: 3 year: 2014 article-title: Percutaneous and surgical insertion of peritoneal catheter in patients starting in chronic dialysis therapy: a comparative study publication-title: Semin Dial contributor: fullname: do Nascimento – volume: 25 start-page: 3070 issue: 9 year: 2010 end-page: 3075 article-title: Moncrief-Popovich technique is an advantageous method of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Rocha – volume: 39 start-page: 414 issue: 5 year: 2019 end-page: 436 article-title: Creating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient: 2019 update publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Chow – volume: 291 start-page: 697 issue: 6 year: 2004 end-page: 703 article-title: Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Powe – volume: 24 start-page: 3499 issue: 11 year: 2009 end-page: 3504 article-title: Safety and efficacy of percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters under sedation and local anaesthetic publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Levy – volume: 22 start-page: 569 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 575 article-title: Long-term complication rates and survival of peritoneal dialysis catheters: the role of percutaneous versus surgical placement publication-title: Semin Dial contributor: fullname: Kyriazis – volume: 298 start-page: 2038 issue: 17 year: 2007 end-page: 2047 article-title: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Stevens – volume: 71 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: 143 article-title: A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access publication-title: Am Surg contributor: fullname: Fishman – volume: 26 start-page: 174 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 175 article-title: Survival and function of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter after surgical or percutaneous placement: one centre experience publication-title: Int J Artif Organs contributor: fullname: Rutkowski – volume: 3 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 53 article-title: Evaluation of medical insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters publication-title: Nephro-Urology Monthly contributor: fullname: Akoh – volume: 26 start-page: 17 issue: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 18 article-title: Post-implantation events of swan-neck catheters for PD publication-title: EDTNA-ERCA J contributor: fullname: Contreras – volume: 29 start-page: 137 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 139 article-title: Bed-side blind insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters publication-title: EDTNA ERCA J contributor: fullname: Van Biesen – volume: 22 start-page: 267 issue: 2 year: 2002 end-page: 269 article-title: Simplified percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: comparison with surgical placement publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Moranne – volume: 27 start-page: 4196 issue: 11 year: 2012 end-page: 4204 article-title: Radiological versus surgical implantation of first catheter for peritoneal dialysis: a randomized non-inferiority trial publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Marshall – volume: 8 issue: 2 year: 2013 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta-analysis publication-title: PLoS One contributor: fullname: Dor – volume: 39 issue: 3 year: 1993 article-title: A new laparoscopic method for implantation of peritoneal catheters publication-title: ASAIO J contributor: fullname: Cruz – volume: 13 start-page: 69 year: 2012 article-title: Laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: BMC Nephrol contributor: fullname: He – volume: 8 start-page: 626 issue: 7 year: 1993 end-page: 630 article-title: Peritoneal dialysis catheters: a comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Eisinger – volume: 26 start-page: 268 issue: 4 year: 2016 end-page: 274 article-title: Comparison of outcomes between surgically placed and percutaneously placed peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective study publication-title: Indian J Nephrol contributor: fullname: Mahajan – volume: 21 start-page: 1539 issue: 11 year: 2002 end-page: 1558 article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med contributor: fullname: Thompson – volume: 25 start-page: 1194 issue: 6 year: 2014 end-page: 1201 article-title: Percutaneous versus laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: simplicity and favorable outcome publication-title: Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl contributor: fullname: Al-Hwiesh – volume: 25 start-page: 895 issue: 6 year: 2014 end-page: 903 article-title: Fluoroscopic versus laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective cohort study publication-title: J Vasc Interv Radiol contributor: fullname: Marshall – volume: 60 start-page: 102 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 111 article-title: Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study publication-title: Am J Kidney Dis contributor: fullname: Webster – volume: 375 start-page: 1296 issue: 9722 year: 2010 end-page: 1309 article-title: Early recognition and prevention of chronic kidney disease publication-title: Lancet contributor: fullname: Tonelli – volume: 151 start-page: 264 issue: 4 year: 2009 end-page: 269 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med contributor: fullname: Group – volume: 11 start-page: 316 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 322 article-title: Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients publication-title: J Vasc Access contributor: fullname: Saxena – volume: 23 start-page: 181 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 184 article-title: A comparison of laparoscopic and conventional methods in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in patients with end-stage renal disease: single center experience publication-title: Turk Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Gok Oguz – volume: 194 start-page: 872 issue: 6 year: 2007 end-page: 875 article-title: Peritoneal dialysis catheters: laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes publication-title: Am J Surg contributor: fullname: Jennings – volume: 35 start-page: 576 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 585 article-title: Comparison of percutaneous and open surgical techniques for first-time peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the unbreached peritoneum publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Mellotte – volume: 185 issue: 9 year: 2013 article-title: Prevalence estimates of chronic kidney disease in Canada: results of a nationally representative survey publication-title: CMAJ contributor: fullname: Brenner – volume: 37 start-page: 141 issue: 2 year: 2017 end-page: 154 article-title: ISPD catheter-related infection recommendations: 2017 update publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Johnson – volume: 16 start-page: 463 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 468 article-title: Comparing the outcomes of open surgical procedure and percutaneously peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion using laparoscopic needle: a two month follow-up study publication-title: J Res Med Sci contributor: fullname: Beigi – volume: 16 start-page: 1893 issue: 9 year: 2001 end-page: 1899 article-title: Technical survival of CAPD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Akoglu – volume: 34 start-page: 204 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 211 article-title: Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by a nephrologist: a new, simple, and safe technique publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Al-Hwiesh – volume: 10 start-page: 231 issue: 3 year: 1990 end-page: 235 article-title: The curled catheter: dependable device for percutaneous peritoneal access publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Lees – volume: 10 start-page: 11 year: 2016 end-page: 18 article-title: Surgical versus percutaneous techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a meta-analysis of the outcomes publication-title: Ann Med Surg (Lond) contributor: fullname: Songtish – volume: 366 year: 2019 article-title: RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials publication-title: BMJ contributor: fullname: Page – volume: 19 start-page: 1202 issue: 8 year: 2008 end-page: 1207 article-title: Comparison of outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheters placed by the fluoroscopically guided percutaneous method versus directly visualized surgical method publication-title: J Vasc Interv Radiol contributor: fullname: Liu – volume: 38 start-page: 1058 issue: 5 year: 2014 end-page: 1064 article-title: The outcomes of percutaneous versus open placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters publication-title: World J Surg contributor: fullname: Kim – volume: 27 start-page: 557 issue: 4 year: 1996 end-page: 565 article-title: An economic evaluation of hospital-based hemodialysis and home-based peritoneal dialysis for pediatric patients publication-title: Am J Kidney Dis contributor: fullname: Tipper – volume: 21 start-page: 416 issue: 5 year: 2016 end-page: 422 article-title: Comparison of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion techniques: peritoneoscopic, radiological and laparoscopic: a single-centre study publication-title: Nephrology (Carlton) contributor: fullname: Lam-Po-Tang – volume: 39 start-page: 368 issue: 5 year: 1953 end-page: 376 article-title: Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique publication-title: Acta Radiol contributor: fullname: Seldinger – volume: 16 start-page: 498 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 505 article-title: Percutaneous versus surgical insertion of PD catheters in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis publication-title: J Vasc Access contributor: fullname: Chapla – volume: 18 start-page: 455 issue: 6 year: 1995 end-page: 464 article-title: Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) publication-title: Clin Invest Med contributor: fullname: Churchill – volume: 38 start-page: 163 issue: 3 year: 2018 end-page: 171 article-title: Advanced laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Perit Dial Int contributor: fullname: Wilkie – volume: 94 year: 2011 article-title: Comparison of the Seldinger technique and surgical technique in Tenckhoff catheter insertion in CAPD patients: a single center experience publication-title: J Med Assoc Thai contributor: fullname: Kanjanabuch – ident: bibr24-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1111/nep.12621. – ident: bibr25-20543581211052731 doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.144252. – ident: bibr41-20543581211052731 doi: 10.5301/jva.2010.5774. – ident: bibr38-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.023. – ident: bibr46-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1177/000313480507100209 – ident: bibr23-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.05.006. – ident: bibr16-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.038. – ident: bibr43-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.007. – volume: 18 start-page: 455 issue: 6 year: 1995 ident: bibr4-20543581211052731 publication-title: Clin Invest Med contributor: fullname: Goeree R – ident: bibr49-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00230. – ident: bibr32-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1177/039139880302600213. – ident: bibr36-20543581211052731 doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.163425. – volume: 8 start-page: 626 issue: 7 year: 1993 ident: bibr21-20543581211052731 publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant contributor: fullname: Mellotte G – ident: bibr3-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038. – ident: bibr22-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00621.x. – ident: bibr35-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1177/089686080202200216 – ident: bibr19-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp312. – ident: bibr27-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1111/sdi.12147. – ident: bibr1-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120833. – volume: 3 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: bibr34-20543581211052731 publication-title: Nephro-Urology Monthly contributor: fullname: Rana T – ident: bibr40-20543581211052731 doi: 10.5301/jva.5000439. – ident: bibr13-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1002/9780470386347 – ident: bibr44-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1097/00002480-199339030-00123 – ident: bibr48-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056351. – ident: bibr28-20543581211052731 doi: 10.5262/tndt.2014.1003.02. – ident: bibr47-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-69. – ident: bibr11-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. – volume: 94 year: 2011 ident: bibr20-20543581211052731 publication-title: J Med Assoc Thai contributor: fullname: Khositrangsikun K – ident: bibr2-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62004-3. – ident: bibr17-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2000.tb00112.x. – ident: bibr12-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1002/9780470712184 – ident: bibr14-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1002/sim.1186. – ident: bibr9-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3109/00016925309136722. – ident: bibr31-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq142. – volume: 16 start-page: 463 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: bibr26-20543581211052731 publication-title: J Res Med Sci contributor: fullname: Atapour A – ident: bibr7-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030. – ident: bibr6-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1001/jama.291.6.697. – ident: bibr18-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2003.tb00294.x. – ident: bibr45-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3747/pdi.2018.00232. – ident: bibr33-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.9.1893. – ident: bibr37-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs305. – ident: bibr5-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90167-5. – ident: bibr30-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2346-5. – ident: bibr8-20543581211052731 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. – ident: bibr15-20543581211052731 – ident: bibr29-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00003. – ident: bibr39-20543581211052731 doi: 10.1177/089686089001000309 – ident: bibr50-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00160. – ident: bibr42-20543581211052731 doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00120. |
SSID | ssj0001255791 |
Score | 2.2526853 |
Snippet | Background:
Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with... Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure.... Background: Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with... BACKGROUNDHome-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed sage |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 20543581211052731 |
SubjectTerms | Bias Catheters Infections Meta-analysis Original Clinical Research Quantitative Patients Peritoneal dialysis Peritonitis Systematic review |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ3dSxwxEMAH8UH6UqqtdusHEQoFYTHZTTYb3_yoaOGkoIJvS76W3stazrv_35nN3nmHlr74tLCbhWFmksxkkl8AvodaVNrJNrdaxlzqMuRWxZh7JVplFM4SgU4jj26qq3v560E9LF31RXvCEh44Ke64DKJw3ArRFk6WztXCF7UNsTa8bU2VjvkKtZRMpdUVpbQRQxmTCEsFxibE-qKEh6BjYmUi6nn9bwWZr_dKLm346uegy0_wcQge2WkSehPWYrcFG6OhPP4Zut9x4mcY7kXM5xktheHjdjbpRzd23VHlHe3AHluGLcfE4cb3F-PEJWH9aUCibZ6wU3a7QDyzVD9gtgtsFKc2n4NMvsD95c-786t8uFAh97I207zwliKcoLzn0ZtohcNxt_WB82CjEl5JWWjHna4IxMcD95WWPNbcR5rry21Y71C0r8A8BpZREEvVS9lqXUtsKpzVDnNtE8oMjubabf4mbkYjBrT4K1NkcEb6XzQk5HX_Ah2hGRyh-Z8jZLA3t14z9MOnBvNDjBhxxK8yOFx8xh5EZZFkjQYTQEMDm5YZ7CRjLyShc7bKcJWBXnGDFVFXv3TjPz2lm0ByhcE_f5DDvIj0Ty18ew8t7MKHgnbd9ItEe7A-ncziPoZNU3fQ95Bn_PMSbA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库 dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEB_OE8QX8duep0QQBCFs0iZN44ucH8cqrAjnwb6VfFX3pXuu3f__Zvqxd8upT4U0hTQzmfllJvMLwOtYydJ41XBnVOLKFJE7nRIPWjbaavQSkaqRF9_K-bn6utTLA5hPtTB0rHKyib2hjutAMfIZIn30_bh2y5nzFAUI3ez9xW9O90dRnnW8TOMW3JY5wgrUbLM016ItWhsrx7QmMS7liFWI-4s2QERCJvccU8_f_zfQefPs5LUDYL1POr0P90YwyU4G6T-Ag9Q-hDuLMV3-CNrvaRO2CP8S7u8Zhcbwcbbd9NaOfWkpE49yYeuGYc8V8XJj-6fVwFPC-upAYt98x07Y2Y7ymQ35BObayBapc3wiNnkM56eff3yc8_GCBR5UZTueB0eIJ-oQRAo2OenRDjchChFd0jJopXLjhTclEfOJKEJplEiVCIl8f_EEDlsc2jNgAYFmksStGpRqjKkUdpXeGY97bxuLDN5Os1tfDDwatRypxm-IIoMPNP-7jkSB3TesNz_rcUXVRZS5F07KJveq8L6SIa9cTJUVTWPLKoPjSXr1uC7_1FdalMGr3WtcUZQmGaRR44bQkqEzKoOng7B3I6G6W22FzsDsqcHeUPfftKtfPWs3EcvlFr98QwpzNaR_zsLR_3_gOdzN6XxNHw46hsNus00vECB1_mWv-5dJJg1G priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 dbid: AFRWT link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1bi9QwFD6ssyC-iHerq0QQBCGatEnT-iLjZViFEXF3cd9KbtV52I7Mtg_-e8_pZdxhV_CpkKTkcE4u5_oF4HkoZG6cqrk1KnJlssCtjpF7LWtdarwlAlUjL7_khyfq86k-3YP1VAszcvD8FaVVIUX9YU27m7zRr8cgI1rsWhFwF1kvhCAm33btWTW4u6dXNaiF4tPdGYW2PSVE_uZTeds12E8JFXcG-_PFt-_HF9wyWpv-nT2ag9MkYyz0ynl3brMe9P8qTfVywuWFrLH-IlvcgpujBsrmw5K5DXuxuQPXl2OM_S40X-PGd6gzxnV3zsifhp-jbtMfkexTQ-F7FCZb1wxHrgjMG9s_rAZwE9aXFBJk5xs2Z0dbnGg2BCGYbQJbxtbyCQ3lHpwsPh6_P-Tjqwzcq6JseeotqUlBey-iL6OVDg_v2gchgo1aeq1UapxwJic0PxGEz40SsRA-ksKQ3YdZg6Q9BOZRO42SAFm9UrUxhcKh0lnj0GAvQ5bAy4m71a8BfKOSIz75JVEk8I74vx1IuNl9w3rzoxq3YZUFmTphpaxTpzLnCunTwoZYlKKuy7xI4GCSXjUtxQqNTFQ78drIE3i27cZtSLGVQRoVWpElnY5GJfBgEPaWEirW1aXQCZidZbBD6m5Ps_rZQ30TGl1a4p8vaMH8JemfXHj03yMfw42U8nN6d9IBzNpNF5-ggtW6p-Om-AMEcB7i priority: 102 providerName: SAGE Publications – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3daxQxEB9KBfFFWj-3VokgCMJKsptsNgWR-lGqcCLUg74t-Vo9KNu63oH-987sZk-Pnm8-LWQTGGYmmd9kkl8AnoVaVNrJNrdaxlzqMuRWxZh7JVplFEaJQLeRZ5-q07n8eK7Od2B63iop8MfW1I7ek5r3Fy9_fv_1Gif8q1RyxPxdSaLxolyG-MQwGbpRyFKSw88S2h-3XJTSRqTa5taRG9FpIPHfhjyvH6D86xTYEJhO9uB2QpTseHSBfdiJ3R24OUs187vQfY69XyEGjJjkM9ofw8_Zqh-WPPaho3I8Goddtgx7LoicG9vfLUayEjZcESQKziN2zM7WvM9sLCow2wU2i0ubT-wm92B-8v7L29M8vbKQe1mbZV54S7AnKO959CZa4XAxbn3gPNiohFdSFtpxpyti5-OB-0pLHmvuIwGA8j7sdijaQ2Ae0WYURLDqpWy1riV2Fc5qhwm4CWUGLybtNlcjmUYjEt_4NVNk8Ib0v-5IPNhDw2X_tUnTqimDKBy3QrSFk6VztfBFbUOsDW9bU9UZHE7WaybfajBpRBiJYaDK4On6N04rqpWM1mgwKzS02mmZwYPR2GtJ6PKtMlxloDfcYEPUzT_d4ttA3U3scoXBkc_JYf6I9E8tHPwPLTyCWwUdxRl2jg5hd9mv4mPEUkv3ZJghvwFBYxmH priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Percutaneous Versus Surgical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20543581211052731 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795905 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2613248766/abstract/ https://search.proquest.com/docview/2599183274 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8593295 https://doaj.org/article/3d12b0a11f2b43bb81c28ade890ff968 |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED_aDsZexr7nrgsaDAYDN5YtWdbe0q6hG6SEfrC8GevDXWB1S5r8_7uT7Syh28teLJAEPnQfutOdfgL46AqeKyPquFLCx0JlLq6k97GVvJZa4i7h6Dby5Cw_vRLfZ3K2A7K_CxOK9q2ZHza_bg6b-c9QW3l3Y4d9ndhwOjkmjK5Uy-Eu7Kos2wjR24MVKZXmXQaTwJVSdEsI5otiHcIbo9dh6AKl1PRo3cZ2FFD7_-ZqPqyY3Cj7CjvR-Bk87VxINmpJfQ47vnkBjyddkvwlNFO_sCt0-jxG9YwOxLC5WC2CjWPfGsq_IzfYbc1w5pzQuLH_67xFJ2HhTiBhbn5hI3axBnpmbRaBVY1jE7-s4h7O5BVcjU8uj0_j7lmF2IpCL-PUVuTnOGlt4q32FTdofWvrksRVXnIrhUiVSYzKCY4vcYnNlUh8kVhPO372GvYaJO0tMIvupeeEqGqFqJUqBE7lplIGI27tsgg-96tb3rXoGSXvAMYfcCWCI1r_9UQCvg4dt4vrsmN_mTmemqTivE6NyIwpuE2LyvlCJ3Wt8yKCg557ZaeN9yVGieg3ot3PI_iwHkY9ouRIy40Sw0BN5k2JCN60zF5T0gtLBGpLDLZI3R5B0Q1Y3Z2oRvCJBOYPSf9chf3__sc7eJJSwU04HzqAveVi5d-jx7Q0A9STmRrAo9H4_McltkcnZ9PzQTh_wO9EFIOgQ78BV5sYkg |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,4043,12083,21416,21994,24346,27886,27956,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,43345,43840,44980,45368,53827,53829 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB5BkYAL4lkCLRgJCQkpwk7sOOaC-qDaQrdCaivtLfIrsJds2e7-f2YS77arAqdIjiNNPJ73-DPA-1CLSjvZ5lbLmEtdhtyqGHOvRKuMQisR6DTy-LQaXchvEzVJCber1Fa50om9og4zTznyT-jpo-1H2a2-XP7O6dYoqq6mKzTuwj1ZlpJa-vRE38ixKKWNSMVMwlkq0EMhxC8Kewh6TGyYox61_2-u5u2OyRttX70lOnoMj5ILyfYGnj-BO7F7CvfHqUj-DLofce6X6PRFjOoZJcTwcbac9zqOHXdUf0dusFnLcOaU0Lhx_HA6oJOw_kwgYW5-ZnvsbA30zIYqArNdYOO4sPkKzuQ5XBx9PT8Y5elahdzL2izywlvyc4LynkdvohUOtW_rA-fBRiW8krLQjjtdERwfD9xXWvJYcx_J4pcvYKtD0l4C8-heRkGIql7KVuta4lThrHYYcZtQZvBxtbrN5YCe0YgEMH6LFRns0_qvJxLwdT8wm_9skhw1ZRCF41aItnCydK4WvqhtiLXhbWuqOoOdFfeaJI1XzfXeyeDd-jXKERVHBm40GAYaUm9aZrA9MHtNCZ22VYarDPTGNtggdfNNN_3VY3UTnFxh8MsPtGGuSfrnKrz6_w-8hQej8_FJc3J8-v01PCyow6ZPCO3A1mK-jLvoIi3cm14O_gAiKAx5 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3daxQxEB_kCsUX0fq1Wm0EQRBWk91ks_HtbD1a9UqxLfZtydfqvWzLeff_O7ObO3u0BZ8W8rEMM5nMV_ILwNtQi0o72eZWy5hLXYbcqhhzr0SrjEIrEeg28vS4OjyXXy_URUq40V2YxME_H-hYFVLUb9ak3Veh_ZhqjBiwK0m4XRS8EIAYRj9bUpqaj2BrPPnx8-xalkUp3T-bR3NympRKm7f-Z8M49Rj-tzmeN89PXjsE1tulyUN4kBxKNh5WwCO4F7sd2J6mkvlj6E7i3C_RBYwY4zNKj-HndDnvdzx21FE1HmXDLluGI2eEzY3tB7MBq4T1NwQJgfMTG7PTNewzG2oKzHaBTePC5itwkydwPvlytn-Yp0cWci9rs8gLb8nrCcp7Hr2JVjjci1sfOA82KuGVlIV23OmKwPl44L7Sksea-0j2v3wKow5Jew7Mo7MZBeGreilbrWuJQ4Wz2mH8bUKZwfsVd5urAUujEQlu_IYoMvhM_F8PJBjsvuFy_qtJWtWUQRSOWyHawsnSuVr4orYh1oa3ranqDHZX0mtWK6vBmBG9SLQCVQZv1t2oVVQqGaTRYFBoaLPTMoNng7DXlNDdW2W4ykBvLIMNUjd7utnvHrmbwOUKgzPf0YL5R9KdXHjx3yP3YPvkYNJ8Pzr-9hLuF3Typk8U7cJoMV_GV-g6LdzrpB9_AVF6DVw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous+Versus+Surgical+Insertion+of+Peritoneal+Dialysis+Catheters%3A+A+Systematic+Review+and+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Canadian+journal+of+kidney+health+and+disease&rft.au=Anirudh+Agarwal&rft.au=Reid+H.+Whitlock&rft.au=Ryan+J.+Bamforth&rft.au=Thomas+W.+Ferguson&rft.date=2021&rft.pub=SAGE+Publishing&rft.eissn=2054-3581&rft.volume=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F20543581211052731&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_3d12b0a11f2b43bb81c28ade890ff968 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2054-3581&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2054-3581&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2054-3581&client=summon |