Incorporating stakeholders’ preferences into a multi-criteria framework for planning large-scale Nature-Based Solutions

Hydro-meteorological risks are a growing issue for societies, economies and environments around the world. An effective, sustainable response to such risks and their future uncertainty requires a paradigm shift in our research and practical efforts. In this respect, Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) off...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmbio Vol. 50; no. 8; pp. 1514 - 1531
Main Authors Ruangpan, Laddaporn, Vojinovic, Zoran, Plavšić, Jasna, Doong, Dong-Jiing, Bahlmann, Tobias, Alves, Alida, Tseng, Leng-Hsuan, Randelović, Anja, Todorović, Andrijana, Kocic, Zvonimir, Beljinac, Vladimir, Wu, Meng-Hsuan, Lo, Wei-Cheng, Perez-Lapeña, Blanca, Franca, Mário J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.08.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hydro-meteorological risks are a growing issue for societies, economies and environments around the world. An effective, sustainable response to such risks and their future uncertainty requires a paradigm shift in our research and practical efforts. In this respect, Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) offer the potential to achieve a more effective and flexible response to hydro-meteorological risks while also enhancing human well-being and biodiversity. The present paper describes a new methodology that incorporates stakeholders’ preferences into a multi-criteria analysis framework, as part of a tool for selecting risk mitigation measures. The methodology has been applied to Tamnava river basin in Serbia and Nangang river basin in Taiwan within the EC-funded RECONECT project. The results highlight the importance of involving stakeholders in the early stages of projects in order to achieve successful implementation of NBSs. The methodology can assist decision-makers in formulating desirable benefits and co-benefits and can enable a systematic and transparent NBSs planning process.
ISSN:0044-7447
1654-7209
DOI:10.1007/s13280-020-01419-4