The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases
Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects and methods In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–2...
Saved in:
Published in | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 496 - 501 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01.06.2001
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI | 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x |
Cover
Abstract | Objective
To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.
Subjects and methods
In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).
Results
Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of ‘low placental position’, with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20–23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20–23‐week scan.
Conclusion
At 20–23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication‐based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false‐positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20–23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20–23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
---|---|
AbstractList | To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.
In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).
Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan.
At 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects and methods In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%). Results Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of ‘low placental position’, with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20–23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20–23‐week scan. Conclusion At 20–23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication‐based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false‐positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20–23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20–23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.OBJECTIVETo determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).SUBJECTS AND METHODSIn an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan.RESULTSTransabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan.At 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery.CONCLUSIONAt 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. |
Author | Vonk, R. Mende, B. C. Becker, R. H. Ragosch, V. Entezami, M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: R. H. surname: Becker fullname: Becker, R. H. email: bedaktari@t‐online.de – sequence: 2 givenname: R. surname: Vonk fullname: Vonk, R. – sequence: 3 givenname: B. C. surname: Mende fullname: Mende, B. C. – sequence: 4 givenname: V. surname: Ragosch fullname: Ragosch, V. – sequence: 5 givenname: M. surname: Entezami fullname: Entezami, M. |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1042483$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11422970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFV0BeIHYJ1_FPbISQqgoKUqVu2rXleG7AgycZ7My0s2PJnjfkSUhmplCx6srSvd85Vz7nhBx1fYeEUAYlA6HeLEomlCmgBllWAKwEEBUv756Q2d_FEZmBUVDUylTH5CTnBQAowdUzcsyYqCpTw4z8vP6KNGHEjes80r6lq-g8doOLNPbeDaHvqBtoBb9__Ko4_YJ52A3H_S3it0zbPtFVwnnwO_aBwzTeBDfJ5xjDBtP2LR0PxbW7R7WSQL3LmJ-Tp62LGV8c3lNy8_HD9fmn4vLq4vP52WXhhdasUIo3rVSOSee1EFpy4MI4Y9gcWNPWde0YCtl4D3WrlUZpWo0gRq5hleP8lLze-65S_309_sYuQ_YYo-uwX2dbg5GGGTmCLw_gulni3K5SWLq0tffZjcCrA-Cyd7FNY4Ih_-PGSoSeDuo95lOfc8L2ATFByi7sVJqdSrNTm3bXpr0bpe__k_qwT39ILsTHGLzbG9yGiNtHH7Y3VxecMf4HMCK4Sw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgyn_2010_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2024_02_033 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1261 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001005 crossref_primary_10_1054_cuog_2002_0314 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0001_6349_2005_00698_x crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_33_5_745 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_005_1694_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_013_3165_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0335_09_50195_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1479_828X_2012_01416_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2014_02_028 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12244 crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2016_1171837 crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_33_4_691 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_AOG_0000207559_15715_98 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1492 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_018_1919_9 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2012_31_4_577 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12065 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1786521 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_curobgyn_2006_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2019_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2019_06_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clp_2011_03_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12312 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2315_7550 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_10_019 crossref_primary_10_1097_OGX_0b013e3182685870 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10018_1250 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_017_1745_5 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semperi_2013_06_017 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13834 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1564 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1563 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02894_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14051649 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_02_050 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12352 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2018_1531119 crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2022_0118 crossref_primary_10_2478_s11536_011_0134_x crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28617 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000000129 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2393_12_82 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1511 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_008_2140_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_06_040 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000000245 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10018_1249 crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_2740 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_32400_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_7312 crossref_primary_10_1097_RUQ_0000000000000044 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15306 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_11133 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15622 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_3873 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2020_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2010_02621_x crossref_primary_10_12968_ajmw_2009_3_3_123 crossref_primary_10_1111_tmi_12100 crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2012_31_7_985 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2020_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_12700 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjom_2015_23_2_88 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology – notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1469-0705 |
EndPage | 501 |
ExternalDocumentID | 11422970 1042483 10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x UOG311 |
Genre | article Evaluation Studies Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OC 24P 29Q 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V2E V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4881-663bf56a15ac8448530349a991d01bf777a1e45bcc07f868e59f8e04530b12a33 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0960-7692 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 17:34:18 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:24:37 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:15:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:53:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:20 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:50:03 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Sonography Human Statistical analysis Placenta previa Pregnancy disorders Placenta diseases Epidemiology Incidence Prenatal Placenta Morphological analysis Echography Delivery disorders Diagnosis |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4881-663bf56a15ac8448530349a991d01bf777a1e45bcc07f868e59f8e04530b12a33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 11422970 |
PQID | 70959195 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_70959195 pubmed_primary_11422970 pascalfrancis_primary_1042483 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x wiley_primary_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x_UOG311 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | June 2001 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2001-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2001 text: June 2001 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Chichester – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2001 |
Publisher | Blackwell Science Ltd Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Science Ltd – name: Wiley |
SSID | ssj0006436 |
Score | 1.9310852 |
Snippet | Objective
To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.
Subjects... To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. In an ongoing... To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.OBJECTIVETo determine... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 496 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cesarean Section Confidence Intervals Female Gestational Age Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Incidence Management. Prenatal diagnosis Medical sciences Obstetric Labor Complications - prevention & control Placenta - anatomy & histology Placenta - diagnostic imaging Placenta previa Placenta Previa - diagnostic imaging Placenta Previa - epidemiology Predictive Value of Tests Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, Second Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Prenatal diagnosis Prospective Studies Reference Values Risk Assessment Second trimester Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography, Prenatal Ultrasound |
Title | The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046%2Fj.1469-0705.2001.00423.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11422970 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70959195 |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB5CDiVQ-k7jNkl16NWLZEmW3Vtpk4ZCEghZyM1Itgxhy-6yj_Rx6rH3_sP-ks5IdjYbcgillz3sesRKntF8mhl9A_BWcSt8QzyVWdOkCgFyWuatTLWkeyD4iw21Occn-dFQfb7QF139E92FifwQ1wE3soywX5OBWxe7kPDAbhuMnC7gcE3HPDEIJR4DwpNC5kSj__FsxSSFjjekLRGwpyYv-6KePsF510Brnurh1M5x0drY7eIuOLqOboN7OnwMo35isSplNFgu3KD-cYvz8f_M_Ak86lAsex_V7ils-PEzeHDc5emfwy_UPkbtWEKBAZu0LNR-0c1LRt6TtIHZBcv4n5-_M8koydVFJdlX70dzhliaTWc0YHj2xgj09dWlJfEGJ4Km-P0dW5GW06MFAkJWo3-ev4Dh4cH5h6O06_mQ1riViBQBkGt1boW2dYFHRy2JQMciim24cK0xBnVLaVfX3LRFXnhdtoVHXCq5E5mVchs2x5Ox3wHGrVGubvDDtsqUmdME5zJH2w7CMJeA6d9vVXeE6NSX40sVEvMqjwejsqKFpnadogoLXX1LQFxLTiMpyD1k9tZU6IagylQhE3jTq1SFFk5pGzv2k-W8MhSqFaVO4GXUtJUoBfBKwxPQQV_u_Weq4eknKcSrf5R7DVuxFI-CUbuwuZgt_R5is4XbD1b3F9L6KCY |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwEB5VRSpICMpPS4BSH7hmiWM7TnpDQFmgWyTUlXqz7MSRqla7q-5uC5w49s4b8iTMOEm3W_VQIS45JB4rtmc8n2fGMwCvZWK5ryhPZVpVsUSAHBdZLWIl6B4IfrEhNmewn_WH8vOhOmzLAdFdmCY_xKXBjSQj7Nck4GSQftO6JTsppxs4iaJzHu-FGI8eAso7EnEHncTef1vkkkLVGxyXCNljnRVdWE_n4ryppyVddX9ipzhtdVPv4iZAuoxvg4LafQgn3dCauJTj3nzmeuXPa1kf_9PY1-FBC2TZ24bzHsGKHz2GtUHrqn8CF8iAjCqyhBgDNq5ZCP-iy5eMFCgxBLMzliZ_fv1OBSM_V2uYZOfeH08Zwmk2OaUOQ9srPdDrsyNL5BWOBKXxxw5b5C2npjmuDStRRU-fwnD3w8G7ftyWfYhL3E14jBjI1SqzXNkyx9OjEpRDxyKQrRLuaq01spdUriwTXedZ7lVR5x6hqUgcT60QG7A6Go_8M2CJ1dKVFT5sLXWROkWILnW08yAScxHoboFN2eZEp9IcJyb45mXWnI0KQxNNFTu5CRNtvkfALyknTV6QW9BsLfHQFUKZylxEsN3xlEEhJ8-NHfnxfGo0WWt5oSLYbFhtQUo2vEInEajAMLf-GTP8-lFw_vwf6bbhbv9gsGf2Pu1_eQH3msg8sk29hNXZ6dxvIVSbuVdBBP8CZ6YsRQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hVqqQEOVNgFIfuGaJYztOuCFgKY8WhFipN8tObKlatLvq7gLtiSN3_iG_hBkn6XZRDxXikkOSsWJnxvN5ngBPZGa5b6hOZd40qUSAnFZFEKkSlAeCT2yMzdk_KPZG8u2hOuzinygXpq0PcWZwI8mI-zUJ-KwJTzuvZC_klICTKTrm8UEM8RggntyUBQILAkifVqWkUPNGvyUi9lQXVR_V03s4LxppTVVdm9k5rlpo211chEfX4W3UT8NtGPcza8NSxoPlwg3q07-KPv6fqd-A6x2MZc9bvrsJV_zkFmztd4762_AT2Y9RP5YYYcCmgcXgL0q9ZKQ-iR2YXbA8-_3jVy4Yebk6syT75v14zhBMs9kxDRjfPTcC3f56ZIm8wYmgLJ48Y6uq5fRqiYiQ1aig53dgNHz1-cVe2jV9SGvcS3iKCMgFVViubF3i2VEJqqBjEcY2GXdBa43MJZWr60yHsii9qkLpEZiKzPHcCnEXNibTib8PLLNaurrBiw1SV7lThOdyR_sO4jCXgO7_r6m7iujUmOOLiZ55WbQno8rQQlO_Tm7iQpvvCfAzyllbFeQSNDtrLHSOUOayFAns9ixlUMTJb2MnfrqcG022Wl6pBO61nLYiJQtepbMEVOSXS3-MGX14LTh_8I90u7D18eXQvH9z8O4hXG3D8sgw9Qg2FsdLv4M4beEeRwH8A6lZKvQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+relevance+of+placental+location+at+20-23+gestational+weeks+for+prediction+of+placenta+previa+at+delivery%3A+evaluation+of+8650+cases&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound+in+obstetrics+%26+gynecology&rft.au=Becker%2C+R+H&rft.au=Vonk%2C+R&rft.au=Mende%2C+B+C&rft.au=Ragosch%2C+V&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046%2Fj.1469-0705.2001.00423.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |