The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases

Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects and methods In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 496 - 501
Main Authors Becker, R. H., Vonk, R., Mende, B. C., Ragosch, V., Entezami, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.06.2001
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0960-7692
1469-0705
DOI10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x

Cover

Abstract Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects and methods In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%). Results Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of ‘low placental position’, with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20–23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20–23‐week scan. Conclusion At 20–23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication‐based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false‐positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20–23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20–23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
AbstractList To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%). Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan. At 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery.
Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects and methods In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20–23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%). Results Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of ‘low placental position’, with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20–23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20–23‐week scan. Conclusion At 20–23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication‐based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false‐positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20–23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20–23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.OBJECTIVETo determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.In an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).SUBJECTS AND METHODSIn an ongoing prospective study, placental position was determined by transabdominal sonography as part of anomaly scanning at 20-23 gestational weeks, followed by transvaginal sonography in uncertain or suspicious situations. Examination was performed in 9532 cases; feedback was obtained from 8650 patients (90.7%).Transabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan.RESULTSTransabdominal sonography was followed by transvaginal scan in 363 of 8650 cases (4.2%). In 8551 cases (98.9%), we found normal placental position, with the placenta not reaching the internal os and a Cesarean section rate of 17.1% (1458/8551). The incidence of 'low placental position', with the placenta reaching the internal os was 0.66% (57/8650), with a Cesarean section rate of 21% (12/57). In 0.49% (42/8650) of cases, the placenta overlapped the internal os at 20-23 weeks; Cesarean section because of placenta previa or bleeding was performed in 28 of 8650 cases (0.32%). Vaginal delivery was possible in 43% of cases (13/30), when the overlap did not exceed 25 mm. If the overlap exceeded 25 mm (12 cases), no vaginal delivery was reported. There was no reported case of placenta previa missed at the 20-23-week scan.At 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery.CONCLUSIONAt 20-23 weeks, a combination of routine transabdominal and indication-based transvaginal location of placental position is a powerful tool in predicting placenta previa at delivery. The advantage of determining placental position at this stage of pregnancy is a low false-positive rate compared to at earlier stages of pregnancy. We conclude that an overlapping placenta at 20-23 weeks has the consequence of a high probability of placenta previa at delivery. An overlap of 25 mm or more at 20-23 weeks seems to be incompatible with later vaginal delivery.
Author Vonk, R.
Mende, B. C.
Becker, R. H.
Ragosch, V.
Entezami, M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R. H.
  surname: Becker
  fullname: Becker, R. H.
  email: bedaktari@t‐online.de
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R.
  surname: Vonk
  fullname: Vonk, R.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: B. C.
  surname: Mende
  fullname: Mende, B. C.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: V.
  surname: Ragosch
  fullname: Ragosch, V.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: M.
  surname: Entezami
  fullname: Entezami, M.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1042483$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11422970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFV0BeIHYJ1_FPbISQqgoKUqVu2rXleG7AgycZ7My0s2PJnjfkSUhmplCx6srSvd85Vz7nhBx1fYeEUAYlA6HeLEomlCmgBllWAKwEEBUv756Q2d_FEZmBUVDUylTH5CTnBQAowdUzcsyYqCpTw4z8vP6KNGHEjes80r6lq-g8doOLNPbeDaHvqBtoBb9__Ko4_YJ52A3H_S3it0zbPtFVwnnwO_aBwzTeBDfJ5xjDBtP2LR0PxbW7R7WSQL3LmJ-Tp62LGV8c3lNy8_HD9fmn4vLq4vP52WXhhdasUIo3rVSOSee1EFpy4MI4Y9gcWNPWde0YCtl4D3WrlUZpWo0gRq5hleP8lLze-65S_309_sYuQ_YYo-uwX2dbg5GGGTmCLw_gulni3K5SWLq0tffZjcCrA-Cyd7FNY4Ih_-PGSoSeDuo95lOfc8L2ATFByi7sVJqdSrNTm3bXpr0bpe__k_qwT39ILsTHGLzbG9yGiNtHH7Y3VxecMf4HMCK4Sw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgyn_2010_07_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2024_02_033
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1261
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001005
crossref_primary_10_1054_cuog_2002_0314
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0001_6349_2005_00698_x
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_33_5_745
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_005_1694_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_013_3165_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0246_0335_09_50195_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1479_828X_2012_01416_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2014_02_028
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12244
crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2016_1171837
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_33_4_691
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_AOG_0000207559_15715_98
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1492
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_018_1919_9
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2012_31_4_577
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12065
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1786521
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_curobgyn_2006_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2019_07_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2019_06_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clp_2011_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12312
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2315_7550
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12310
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_10_019
crossref_primary_10_1097_OGX_0b013e3182685870
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10018_1250
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_017_1745_5
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semperi_2013_06_017
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13834
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1564
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1563
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02894_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14051649
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_02_050
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_12352
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2018_1531119
crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2022_0118
crossref_primary_10_2478_s11536_011_0134_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28617
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000000129
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2393_12_82
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10009_1511
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_008_2140_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_06_040
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000000245
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10018_1249
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_2740
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_32400_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_7312
crossref_primary_10_1097_RUQ_0000000000000044
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15306
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_11133
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15622
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_3873
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2020_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2010_02621_x
crossref_primary_10_12968_ajmw_2009_3_3_123
crossref_primary_10_1111_tmi_12100
crossref_primary_10_7863_jum_2012_31_7_985
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2020_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_12700
crossref_primary_10_12968_bjom_2015_23_2_88
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
2001 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
– notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1469-0705
EndPage 501
ExternalDocumentID 11422970
1042483
10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x
UOG311
Genre article
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OC
24P
29Q
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V2E
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGYGG
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4881-663bf56a15ac8448530349a991d01bf777a1e45bcc07f868e59f8e04530b12a33
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0960-7692
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:34:18 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:24:37 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:53:15 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:20 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:50:03 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Sonography
Human
Statistical analysis
Placenta previa
Pregnancy disorders
Placenta diseases
Epidemiology
Incidence
Prenatal
Placenta
Morphological analysis
Echography
Delivery disorders
Diagnosis
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4881-663bf56a15ac8448530349a991d01bf777a1e45bcc07f868e59f8e04530b12a33
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 11422970
PQID 70959195
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_70959195
pubmed_primary_11422970
pascalfrancis_primary_1042483
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x
wiley_primary_10_1046_j_1469_0705_2001_00423_x_UOG311
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2001-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2001
  text: June 2001
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Chichester
– name: England
PublicationTitle Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2001
Publisher Blackwell Science Ltd
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Science Ltd
– name: Wiley
SSID ssj0006436
Score 1.9310852
Snippet Objective To determine the correlation between placental position at 20–23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. Subjects...
To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position. In an ongoing...
To determine the correlation between placental position at 20-23 weeks and incidence of birth complications caused by placental position.OBJECTIVETo determine...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 496
SubjectTerms Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cesarean Section
Confidence Intervals
Female
Gestational Age
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Incidence
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Obstetric Labor Complications - prevention & control
Placenta - anatomy & histology
Placenta - diagnostic imaging
Placenta previa
Placenta Previa - diagnostic imaging
Placenta Previa - epidemiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prenatal diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Second trimester
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Ultrasound
Title The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046%2Fj.1469-0705.2001.00423.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11422970
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70959195
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB5CDiVQ-k7jNkl16NWLZEmW3Vtpk4ZCEghZyM1Itgxhy-6yj_Rx6rH3_sP-ks5IdjYbcgillz3sesRKntF8mhl9A_BWcSt8QzyVWdOkCgFyWuatTLWkeyD4iw21Occn-dFQfb7QF139E92FifwQ1wE3soywX5OBWxe7kPDAbhuMnC7gcE3HPDEIJR4DwpNC5kSj__FsxSSFjjekLRGwpyYv-6KePsF510Brnurh1M5x0drY7eIuOLqOboN7OnwMo35isSplNFgu3KD-cYvz8f_M_Ak86lAsex_V7ils-PEzeHDc5emfwy_UPkbtWEKBAZu0LNR-0c1LRt6TtIHZBcv4n5-_M8koydVFJdlX70dzhliaTWc0YHj2xgj09dWlJfEGJ4Km-P0dW5GW06MFAkJWo3-ev4Dh4cH5h6O06_mQ1riViBQBkGt1boW2dYFHRy2JQMciim24cK0xBnVLaVfX3LRFXnhdtoVHXCq5E5mVchs2x5Ox3wHGrVGubvDDtsqUmdME5zJH2w7CMJeA6d9vVXeE6NSX40sVEvMqjwejsqKFpnadogoLXX1LQFxLTiMpyD1k9tZU6IagylQhE3jTq1SFFk5pGzv2k-W8MhSqFaVO4GXUtJUoBfBKwxPQQV_u_Weq4eknKcSrf5R7DVuxFI-CUbuwuZgt_R5is4XbD1b3F9L6KCY
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwEB5VRSpICMpPS4BSH7hmiWM7TnpDQFmgWyTUlXqz7MSRqla7q-5uC5w49s4b8iTMOEm3W_VQIS45JB4rtmc8n2fGMwCvZWK5ryhPZVpVsUSAHBdZLWIl6B4IfrEhNmewn_WH8vOhOmzLAdFdmCY_xKXBjSQj7Nck4GSQftO6JTsppxs4iaJzHu-FGI8eAso7EnEHncTef1vkkkLVGxyXCNljnRVdWE_n4ryppyVddX9ipzhtdVPv4iZAuoxvg4LafQgn3dCauJTj3nzmeuXPa1kf_9PY1-FBC2TZ24bzHsGKHz2GtUHrqn8CF8iAjCqyhBgDNq5ZCP-iy5eMFCgxBLMzliZ_fv1OBSM_V2uYZOfeH08Zwmk2OaUOQ9srPdDrsyNL5BWOBKXxxw5b5C2npjmuDStRRU-fwnD3w8G7ftyWfYhL3E14jBjI1SqzXNkyx9OjEpRDxyKQrRLuaq01spdUriwTXedZ7lVR5x6hqUgcT60QG7A6Go_8M2CJ1dKVFT5sLXWROkWILnW08yAScxHoboFN2eZEp9IcJyb45mXWnI0KQxNNFTu5CRNtvkfALyknTV6QW9BsLfHQFUKZylxEsN3xlEEhJ8-NHfnxfGo0WWt5oSLYbFhtQUo2vEInEajAMLf-GTP8-lFw_vwf6bbhbv9gsGf2Pu1_eQH3msg8sk29hNXZ6dxvIVSbuVdBBP8CZ6YsRQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hVqqQEOVNgFIfuGaJYztOuCFgKY8WhFipN8tObKlatLvq7gLtiSN3_iG_hBkn6XZRDxXikkOSsWJnxvN5ngBPZGa5b6hOZd40qUSAnFZFEKkSlAeCT2yMzdk_KPZG8u2hOuzinygXpq0PcWZwI8mI-zUJ-KwJTzuvZC_klICTKTrm8UEM8RggntyUBQILAkifVqWkUPNGvyUi9lQXVR_V03s4LxppTVVdm9k5rlpo211chEfX4W3UT8NtGPcza8NSxoPlwg3q07-KPv6fqd-A6x2MZc9bvrsJV_zkFmztd4762_AT2Y9RP5YYYcCmgcXgL0q9ZKQ-iR2YXbA8-_3jVy4Yebk6syT75v14zhBMs9kxDRjfPTcC3f56ZIm8wYmgLJ48Y6uq5fRqiYiQ1aig53dgNHz1-cVe2jV9SGvcS3iKCMgFVViubF3i2VEJqqBjEcY2GXdBa43MJZWr60yHsii9qkLpEZiKzPHcCnEXNibTib8PLLNaurrBiw1SV7lThOdyR_sO4jCXgO7_r6m7iujUmOOLiZ55WbQno8rQQlO_Tm7iQpvvCfAzyllbFeQSNDtrLHSOUOayFAns9ixlUMTJb2MnfrqcG022Wl6pBO61nLYiJQtepbMEVOSXS3-MGX14LTh_8I90u7D18eXQvH9z8O4hXG3D8sgw9Qg2FsdLv4M4beEeRwH8A6lZKvQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+relevance+of+placental+location+at+20-23+gestational+weeks+for+prediction+of+placenta+previa+at+delivery%3A+evaluation+of+8650+cases&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound+in+obstetrics+%26+gynecology&rft.au=Becker%2C+R+H&rft.au=Vonk%2C+R&rft.au=Mende%2C+B+C&rft.au=Ragosch%2C+V&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046%2Fj.1469-0705.2001.00423.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon