Two mini transverse-incision repair yields better results than percutaneous repair for acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective case-control study

Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 452 - 11
Main Authors Jin, Wen Tao, Huang, Li Fang, Guo, Hai Hua, Wang, Lei, Li, Xiang, Wang, Ze Jin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 31.07.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up. The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.
AbstractList Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up. The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.
Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.
Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.BACKGROUNDAcute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.METHODSAll cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).RESULTSThere was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.CONCLUSIONSThe 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThe study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.
Abstract Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. Methods All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student’s t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for “Tightness Feeling”, “Heel Rising Strength”, and “Foot Numbness” were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The “Re-rupture” and “Return to Sports” indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5–6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1–5 year follow-up. Trial registration The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.
Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. Methods All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up. Trial registration The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. Keywords: Achilles tendon rupture, Minimally invasive repair, Mini open repair, Percutaneous repair
ArticleNumber 452
Audience Academic
Author Huang, Li Fang
Wang, Lei
Li, Xiang
Jin, Wen Tao
Wang, Ze Jin
Guo, Hai Hua
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wen Tao
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, Wen Tao
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Li Fang
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Li Fang
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hai Hua
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Hai Hua
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lei
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Lei
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xiang
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xiang
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ze Jin
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Ze Jin
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkstq3DAUhk1JaS7tC3RRDN1041RXW-qmDKGXQKCbFLoTsnQ8o-CRXEmeMu_Uh6wmTkIGihYSv77z60j6z6sTHzxU1VuMLjEW7ceEKcKiQYQ1iEnEGvGiOsMdk00n5a-TZ-vT6jylO4Q44oK9qk6pRKKsurPq7-2fUG-dd3WO2qcdxASN88YlF3wdYdIu1nsHo011DzlDLGKax5zqvNG-niCaOWsPYU6P-BBirYsKtRlDAlv8bZr7VDAD9cps3DhCqQdvD2fMU54jfKp1qc8xpAlMdrtSrEsrJviijXXKs92_rl4Oekzw5mG-qH5-_XJ79b25-fHt-mp10xgmutxY3KG2JYhr6BlGmjDoqSG90KjrBQIuJBWMdIQPg-FMWoo0opZ3klEjkKQX1fXia4O-U1N0Wx33Kmin7oUQ10rH7MwIilMYNGbDwHvNWiK1EJTS4mxRZ7geitfnxWua-y1YA-U-ejwyPd7xbqPWYacwJkJKworDhweHGH7PkLLaumRgHJdXVxSJVnLOSFvQ9wu61qU354dQLM0BVyuBKMOUIFGoy_9QZVjYuvLgMLiiHxW8e36Hp-YfY1QAsgCm_F-KMDwhGKlDVtWSVVWyqu6zqgT9B9Y_3-g
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.017
10.1056/NEJMoa2108447
10.2106/00004623-199907000-00017
10.1136/bjsm.32.2.174
10.1007/s00776-005-0929-1
10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810877
10.1186/s13018-015-0310-9
10.1002/jor.22853
10.1186/s13018-023-04167-9
10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1
10.2106/JBJS.22.00965
10.1136/bjsports-2013-092271
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021
10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00139
10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00050
10.3113/FAI.2008.0427
10.1177/107110079501600404
10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.35314
10.1007/s00167-007-0411-z
10.3390/jfmk5040095
10.2106/JBJS.M.01273
10.2106/JBJS.M.00248
10.1055/s-0041-1731632
10.1177/0363546515623501
10.21203/rs.3.rs-16380/v1
10.1177/107110070602700605
10.2106/JBJS.15.01117
10.1177/23259671211062929
10.1177/0363546505283266
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s) 2024 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13018-024-04904-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1749-799X
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af
PMC11289924
A803413208
39085847
10_1186_s13018_024_04904_8
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPT
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d17066205aeb410a24eb3c2b8a07b80e5893842725ffc549d30a03d57943c8093
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1749-799X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:31 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:59 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:42:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:07:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:04:21 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:17:50 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Minimally invasive repair
Percutaneous repair
Mini open repair
Achilles tendon rupture
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c487t-d17066205aeb410a24eb3c2b8a07b80e5893842725ffc549d30a03d57943c8093
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s13018-024-04904-8
PMID 39085847
PQID 3086955426
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289924
proquest_miscellaneous_3086955426
gale_infotracmisc_A803413208
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A803413208
pubmed_primary_39085847
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_024_04904_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Orthop Surg Res
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References JM Webb (4904_CR11) 1999; 81
4904_CR16
J Maquirriain (4904_CR7) 2011; 84
SJ Lee (4904_CR22) 2008; 29
N Maffulli (4904_CR2) 1998; 32
SH Bae (4904_CR25) 2016; 98
ML Costa (4904_CR29) 2006; 27
D Tarantino (4904_CR37) 2020; 5
M Gajhede-Knudsen (4904_CR21) 2013; 47
E Wagner (4904_CR17) 2019; 9
W Klein (4904_CR32) 1991; 76
SK Chan (4904_CR19) 2008; 14
B Yang (4904_CR34) 2017; 40
AL Godoy-Santos (4904_CR3) 2018; 113
SH Park (4904_CR6) 2020; 12
N Maffulli (4904_CR1) 1999; 81
TW Watson (4904_CR24) 1995; 16
EP Wellings (4904_CR28) 2021; 9
MC Kord (4904_CR18) 2019; 7
N Maffulli (4904_CR14) 2023; 18
4904_CR4
M Majewski (4904_CR35) 2006; 34
KD Martin (4904_CR15) 2022; 12
SW Young (4904_CR23) 2014; 96
D Campillo-Recio (4904_CR33) 2023; 67
C Chartier (4904_CR27) 2021; 35
TM Ecker (4904_CR8) 2016; 44
GW Ma (4904_CR10) 1977; 128
D McClelland (4904_CR12) 2002; 47
AM Hutchison (4904_CR36) 2015; 97
LM Galatz (4904_CR26) 2015; 33
H Chen (4904_CR20) 2015; 10
T Yotsumoto (4904_CR30) 2005; 10
GJ Steele (4904_CR31) 1993; 2
MR Carmont (4904_CR13) 2008; 16
SB Myhrvold (4904_CR5) 2022; 386
KW Barfod (4904_CR9) 2014; 96
References_xml – volume: 113
  start-page: 20
  year: 2018
  ident: 4904_CR3
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.017
– volume: 128
  start-page: 247
  year: 1977
  ident: 4904_CR10
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 386
  start-page: 1409
  issue: 15
  year: 2022
  ident: 4904_CR5
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447
– volume: 81
  start-page: 1019
  year: 1999
  ident: 4904_CR1
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00017
– volume: 32
  start-page: 174
  issue: 2
  year: 1998
  ident: 4904_CR2
  publication-title: Br J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.174
– volume: 10
  start-page: 515
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: 4904_CR30
  publication-title: J Orthop Sci
  doi: 10.1007/s00776-005-0929-1
– volume: 81
  start-page: 877
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: 4904_CR11
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810877
– volume: 10
  start-page: 167
  year: 2015
  ident: 4904_CR20
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0310-9
– volume: 84
  start-page: 289
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 4904_CR7
  publication-title: Yale J Biol Med
– volume: 33
  start-page: 823
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 4904_CR26
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.22853
– volume: 18
  start-page: 677
  year: 2023
  ident: 4904_CR14
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04167-9
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 4904_CR6
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1
– ident: 4904_CR4
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00965
– volume: 47
  start-page: 763
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: 4904_CR21
  publication-title: Br J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092271
– volume: 76
  start-page: 223
  year: 1991
  ident: 4904_CR32
  publication-title: Chir org mov
– volume: 40
  start-page: 178
  year: 2017
  ident: 4904_CR34
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021
– volume: 9
  start-page: e46
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 4904_CR17
  publication-title: JBJS Essent Surg Tech
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00139
– volume: 12
  start-page: e2100050
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 4904_CR15
  publication-title: JBJS Essent Surg Tech
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00050
– volume: 29
  start-page: 427
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  ident: 4904_CR22
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0427
– volume: 67
  start-page: 139
  issue: 2
  year: 2023
  ident: 4904_CR33
  publication-title: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 191
  year: 1995
  ident: 4904_CR24
  publication-title: Foot Ankle
  doi: 10.1177/107110079501600404
– volume: 97
  start-page: 510
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 4904_CR36
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.35314
– volume: 47
  start-page: 613
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: 4904_CR12
  publication-title: J R Coll Surg Edinb
– volume: 16
  start-page: 199
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 4904_CR13
  publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0411-z
– volume: 5
  start-page: 95
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 4904_CR37
  publication-title: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol
  doi: 10.3390/jfmk5040095
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1497
  issue: 18
  year: 2014
  ident: 4904_CR9
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01273
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1073
  issue: 13
  year: 2014
  ident: 4904_CR23
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00248
– volume: 7
  start-page: 429
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 4904_CR18
  publication-title: ARCH BONE JT SURG
– volume: 35
  start-page: 211
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 4904_CR27
  publication-title: Semin Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731632
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1004
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: 4904_CR8
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546515623501
– ident: 4904_CR16
  doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-16380/v1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 414
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  ident: 4904_CR29
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  doi: 10.1177/107110070602700605
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1161
  issue: 14
  year: 2016
  ident: 4904_CR25
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01117
– volume: 9
  start-page: 232596712110629
  issue: 12
  year: 2021
  ident: 4904_CR28
  publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/23259671211062929
– volume: 34
  start-page: 793
  issue: 5
  year: 2006
  ident: 4904_CR35
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/0363546505283266
– volume: 2
  start-page: 115
  year: 1993
  ident: 4904_CR31
  publication-title: J Sport Rehab
– volume: 14
  start-page: 255
  year: 2008
  ident: 4904_CR19
  publication-title: Hong Kong Med J
SSID ssj0050584
Score 2.3301885
Snippet Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two...
Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared...
Abstract Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 452
SubjectTerms Achilles Tendon - injuries
Achilles Tendon - surgery
Achilles tendon rupture
Adult
Case-Control Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mini open repair
Minimally invasive repair
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Orthopedic Procedures - methods
Percutaneous repair
Retrospective Studies
Rupture - surgery
Tendon Injuries - surgery
Treatment Outcome
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp15KS_pwmxYVCj0UEVkPr5zbtjSEQntKIDch60EDy3rxg9D_1B_ZGdkOa3ropVdJtmXPaOYbeeYTIR-cRCMXSxYSj0wlVTIIIxrmvdpI6XTiBquRv_-orm7Ut1t9e3TUF-aETfTA04c71zImV6qUdONUJWqHp-NKoVPgG69dQusLPm8JpiYbDG7dqKVExlTnPVjq0jDwRwz_dClmVm4os_X_bZOPnNI6YfLIA10-JU9m6Ei305SfkUdxf0p-X9-3FPlB6IBeB5MsIsP9c9wFox04m7uO_sI0tZ42uXQHGvtxN_QUN83pIXZ-BIAY27FfhgOOpQ5aI_W7to8B7h96MDADagjdYv33LsL1EU8Cod14wL8QF9TB9UPXLrWb1IODZHMqPM00ts_JzeXX6y9XbD6BgXkIZAYWkFynEly72KiSO6Eg9vaiMY5vGsOjBrRjlNiAOJKHSDNI7rgMGlnnvOG1fEFO9u0-viJUaVeGOsmqDEbVUtYADYJulOQRKflkQT4tArGHiWjD5gDFVHYSnwXx2Sw-awryGWX2MBJJsnMDqI6dVcf-S3UK8hElbnEpg4y8mysSYMJIimW3hqOPFxwed7YaCUvQr7rfLzpjsQvz1rLcrISIsQbEJqqCvJx06GHOsga4C-CgIGalXauXWvfs735mBnAAyRAnC_X6f3yGN-SxyCsDN6zPyMnQjfEtIK2heZcX1R9c9Cm-
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Two mini transverse-incision repair yields better results than percutaneous repair for acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective case-control study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085847
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3086955426
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11289924
https://doaj.org/article/53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZ5XHopLX1tmy4qFHooamVLsuVCKZuSEBYSSpuFvQlZltvAst76QZL_1B_ZGa29xDSnnhb08MqeGX0zI80MIW-twE3OR6wouWeylBEDMyJnzslUCKtKrjEa-fwiOVvI-VIt98hQ7qj_gM29ph3Wk1rUqw83v2-_gMB_DgKvk48N7MORZoA2DM-xJNP75BCQKcWKBudyd6oAYK_lEDhz77wROIUc_v_u1HeganyN8g4unT4iD3uFks62HPCY7Pn1E_Ln8rqimDWEtohFePXCM_Sqo2-M1gBBVzW9xctrDc1DQA80Nt2qbSi60unG164DtdFXXTMMB-2WWmj11K2qxhfw_KKBbadFvqEzjApfeZjvsT4IrbsNnk18ohbmt3U1RHRSB7DJ-gvyNCS3fUoWpyeXX89YX5eBOTBvWlZgyp0k5sr6XEbcxhIschfn2vI019wr0IG0jNNYlaUD-7MQ3HJRKMxF5zTPxDNysK7W_gWhUtmoyEqRRIWWmRAZKAyFyqXgHhP1iQl5PxDEbLbpN0wwW3RituQzQD4TyGf0hBwjzXYjMXV2aKjqn6aXRKOEL20ky1LlViZxZrHcsoC1Fjx1ypYT8g4pbpDlgEbO9nEKsGBMlWVmmiPyxxz-7mg0EgTTjbrfDDxjsAtvswW6GQF2ZAZ6XJxMyPMtD-3WLDJQgkFlmBA94q7RS4171le_Ql5wUJ3Beo7ly_-f-oo8iIM8oPP6iBy0dedfg9bV5lOyny7TKTmczeY_5vB7fHLx7fs0-DCmQcz-AiLPNMU
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two+mini+transverse-incision+repair+yields+better+results+than+percutaneous+repair+for+acute+closed+midsubstance+Achilles+tendon+rupture%3A+a+retrospective+case-control+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Jin%2C+Wen+Tao&rft.au=Huang%2C+Li+Fang&rft.au=Guo%2C+Hai+Hua&rft.au=Wang%2C+Lei&rft.date=2024-07-31&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=19&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-024-04904-8&rft.externalDocID=PMC11289924
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon