Two mini transverse-incision repair yields better results than percutaneous repair for acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective case-control study
Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criter...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 452 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
31.07.2024
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.
All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).
The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.
The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.
All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).
The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.
The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up. Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.BACKGROUNDAcute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results.All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.METHODSAll cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).RESULTSThere was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05).The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.CONCLUSIONSThe 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up.The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThe study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. Abstract Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. Methods All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student’s t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for “Tightness Feeling”, “Heel Rising Strength”, and “Foot Numbness” were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The “Re-rupture” and “Return to Sports” indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5–6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1–5 year follow-up. Trial registration The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two mini transverse-incision repair (2MTIR) with percutaneous repair (PR) to determine which method yields better results. Methods All cases meeting criteria from 2018 to 2021 in our hospital were included and followed up for 1 to 5 years. A final questionnaire with multiple indexes was conducted via phone call. Comparative analysis of these indexes between the two groups was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.26). Continuous variables that passed tests for normality and equal variance were compared using the Student's t-test. Ranked data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There was one rerupture in the PR group. The final indexes for "Tightness Feeling", "Heel Rising Strength", and "Foot Numbness" were statistically different (P < 0.05) between the two groups. The "Re-rupture" and "Return to Sports" indexes showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The 2MTIR technique provided a technically straightforward, minimally invasive procedure with well-preserved paratenon and direct end-to-end firm fixation in cases of ACMATR. It resulted in very low complications, easy rehabilitation, and full weight-bearing as early as 5-6 weeks postoperatively, yielding better functional outcomes compared to the PR technique in the 1-5 year follow-up. Trial registration The study was preliminarily registered and approved by the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital Ethical Board with Project number: hkuszh2023074 on May 4, 2023. Keywords: Achilles tendon rupture, Minimally invasive repair, Mini open repair, Percutaneous repair |
ArticleNumber | 452 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Huang, Li Fang Wang, Lei Li, Xiang Jin, Wen Tao Wang, Ze Jin Guo, Hai Hua |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wen Tao surname: Jin fullname: Jin, Wen Tao – sequence: 2 givenname: Li Fang surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Li Fang – sequence: 3 givenname: Hai Hua surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Hai Hua – sequence: 4 givenname: Lei surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Lei – sequence: 5 givenname: Xiang surname: Li fullname: Li, Xiang – sequence: 6 givenname: Ze Jin surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Ze Jin |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkstq3DAUhk1JaS7tC3RRDN1041RXW-qmDKGXQKCbFLoTsnQ8o-CRXEmeMu_Uh6wmTkIGihYSv77z60j6z6sTHzxU1VuMLjEW7ceEKcKiQYQ1iEnEGvGiOsMdk00n5a-TZ-vT6jylO4Q44oK9qk6pRKKsurPq7-2fUG-dd3WO2qcdxASN88YlF3wdYdIu1nsHo011DzlDLGKax5zqvNG-niCaOWsPYU6P-BBirYsKtRlDAlv8bZr7VDAD9cps3DhCqQdvD2fMU54jfKp1qc8xpAlMdrtSrEsrJviijXXKs92_rl4Oekzw5mG-qH5-_XJ79b25-fHt-mp10xgmutxY3KG2JYhr6BlGmjDoqSG90KjrBQIuJBWMdIQPg-FMWoo0opZ3klEjkKQX1fXia4O-U1N0Wx33Kmin7oUQ10rH7MwIilMYNGbDwHvNWiK1EJTS4mxRZ7geitfnxWua-y1YA-U-ejwyPd7xbqPWYacwJkJKworDhweHGH7PkLLaumRgHJdXVxSJVnLOSFvQ9wu61qU354dQLM0BVyuBKMOUIFGoy_9QZVjYuvLgMLiiHxW8e36Hp-YfY1QAsgCm_F-KMDwhGKlDVtWSVVWyqu6zqgT9B9Y_3-g |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.017 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00017 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.174 10.1007/s00776-005-0929-1 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810877 10.1186/s13018-015-0310-9 10.1002/jor.22853 10.1186/s13018-023-04167-9 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1 10.2106/JBJS.22.00965 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092271 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00139 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00050 10.3113/FAI.2008.0427 10.1177/107110079501600404 10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.35314 10.1007/s00167-007-0411-z 10.3390/jfmk5040095 10.2106/JBJS.M.01273 10.2106/JBJS.M.00248 10.1055/s-0041-1731632 10.1177/0363546515623501 10.21203/rs.3.rs-16380/v1 10.1177/107110070602700605 10.2106/JBJS.15.01117 10.1177/23259671211062929 10.1177/0363546505283266 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-024-04904-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1749-799X |
EndPage | 11 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af PMC11289924 A803413208 39085847 10_1186_s13018_024_04904_8 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPT ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PMFND 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d17066205aeb410a24eb3c2b8a07b80e5893842725ffc549d30a03d57943c8093 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1749-799X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:25:31 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:42:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:07:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:04:21 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:17:50 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Minimally invasive repair Percutaneous repair Mini open repair Achilles tendon rupture |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c487t-d17066205aeb410a24eb3c2b8a07b80e5893842725ffc549d30a03d57943c8093 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s13018-024-04904-8 |
PMID | 39085847 |
PQID | 3086955426 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289924 proquest_miscellaneous_3086955426 gale_infotracmisc_A803413208 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A803413208 pubmed_primary_39085847 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_024_04904_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-07-31 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-31 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-07-31 day: 31 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Orthop Surg Res |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | JM Webb (4904_CR11) 1999; 81 4904_CR16 J Maquirriain (4904_CR7) 2011; 84 SJ Lee (4904_CR22) 2008; 29 N Maffulli (4904_CR2) 1998; 32 SH Bae (4904_CR25) 2016; 98 ML Costa (4904_CR29) 2006; 27 D Tarantino (4904_CR37) 2020; 5 M Gajhede-Knudsen (4904_CR21) 2013; 47 E Wagner (4904_CR17) 2019; 9 W Klein (4904_CR32) 1991; 76 SK Chan (4904_CR19) 2008; 14 B Yang (4904_CR34) 2017; 40 AL Godoy-Santos (4904_CR3) 2018; 113 SH Park (4904_CR6) 2020; 12 N Maffulli (4904_CR1) 1999; 81 TW Watson (4904_CR24) 1995; 16 EP Wellings (4904_CR28) 2021; 9 MC Kord (4904_CR18) 2019; 7 N Maffulli (4904_CR14) 2023; 18 4904_CR4 M Majewski (4904_CR35) 2006; 34 KD Martin (4904_CR15) 2022; 12 SW Young (4904_CR23) 2014; 96 D Campillo-Recio (4904_CR33) 2023; 67 C Chartier (4904_CR27) 2021; 35 TM Ecker (4904_CR8) 2016; 44 GW Ma (4904_CR10) 1977; 128 D McClelland (4904_CR12) 2002; 47 AM Hutchison (4904_CR36) 2015; 97 LM Galatz (4904_CR26) 2015; 33 H Chen (4904_CR20) 2015; 10 T Yotsumoto (4904_CR30) 2005; 10 GJ Steele (4904_CR31) 1993; 2 MR Carmont (4904_CR13) 2008; 16 SB Myhrvold (4904_CR5) 2022; 386 KW Barfod (4904_CR9) 2014; 96 |
References_xml | – volume: 113 start-page: 20 year: 2018 ident: 4904_CR3 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.017 – volume: 128 start-page: 247 year: 1977 ident: 4904_CR10 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res – volume: 386 start-page: 1409 issue: 15 year: 2022 ident: 4904_CR5 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447 – volume: 81 start-page: 1019 year: 1999 ident: 4904_CR1 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00017 – volume: 32 start-page: 174 issue: 2 year: 1998 ident: 4904_CR2 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.2.174 – volume: 10 start-page: 515 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: 4904_CR30 publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1007/s00776-005-0929-1 – volume: 81 start-page: 877 issue: 5 year: 1999 ident: 4904_CR11 publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Br doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810877 – volume: 10 start-page: 167 year: 2015 ident: 4904_CR20 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0310-9 – volume: 84 start-page: 289 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 4904_CR7 publication-title: Yale J Biol Med – volume: 33 start-page: 823 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 4904_CR26 publication-title: J Orthop Res doi: 10.1002/jor.22853 – volume: 18 start-page: 677 year: 2023 ident: 4904_CR14 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04167-9 – volume: 12 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 4904_CR6 publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1 – ident: 4904_CR4 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00965 – volume: 47 start-page: 763 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 4904_CR21 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092271 – volume: 76 start-page: 223 year: 1991 ident: 4904_CR32 publication-title: Chir org mov – volume: 40 start-page: 178 year: 2017 ident: 4904_CR34 publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021 – volume: 9 start-page: e46 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 4904_CR17 publication-title: JBJS Essent Surg Tech doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00139 – volume: 12 start-page: e2100050 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 4904_CR15 publication-title: JBJS Essent Surg Tech doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00050 – volume: 29 start-page: 427 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 4904_CR22 publication-title: Foot Ankle Int doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0427 – volume: 67 start-page: 139 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 4904_CR33 publication-title: Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol – volume: 16 start-page: 191 year: 1995 ident: 4904_CR24 publication-title: Foot Ankle doi: 10.1177/107110079501600404 – volume: 97 start-page: 510 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 4904_CR36 publication-title: Bone Joint J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.35314 – volume: 47 start-page: 613 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 4904_CR12 publication-title: J R Coll Surg Edinb – volume: 16 start-page: 199 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 4904_CR13 publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0411-z – volume: 5 start-page: 95 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 4904_CR37 publication-title: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol doi: 10.3390/jfmk5040095 – volume: 96 start-page: 1497 issue: 18 year: 2014 ident: 4904_CR9 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01273 – volume: 96 start-page: 1073 issue: 13 year: 2014 ident: 4904_CR23 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00248 – volume: 7 start-page: 429 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 4904_CR18 publication-title: ARCH BONE JT SURG – volume: 35 start-page: 211 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 4904_CR27 publication-title: Semin Plast Surg doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731632 – volume: 44 start-page: 1004 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 4904_CR8 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546515623501 – ident: 4904_CR16 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-16380/v1 – volume: 27 start-page: 414 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 4904_CR29 publication-title: Foot Ankle Int doi: 10.1177/107110070602700605 – volume: 98 start-page: 1161 issue: 14 year: 2016 ident: 4904_CR25 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01117 – volume: 9 start-page: 232596712110629 issue: 12 year: 2021 ident: 4904_CR28 publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/23259671211062929 – volume: 34 start-page: 793 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 4904_CR35 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546505283266 – volume: 2 start-page: 115 year: 1993 ident: 4904_CR31 publication-title: J Sport Rehab – volume: 14 start-page: 255 year: 2008 ident: 4904_CR19 publication-title: Hong Kong Med J |
SSID | ssj0050584 |
Score | 2.3301885 |
Snippet | Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared the two... Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively compared... Abstract Background Acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture(ACMATR) is common, with various treatment methods developed over time. We retrospectively... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 452 |
SubjectTerms | Achilles Tendon - injuries Achilles Tendon - surgery Achilles tendon rupture Adult Case-Control Studies Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Mini open repair Minimally invasive repair Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods Orthopedic Procedures - methods Percutaneous repair Retrospective Studies Rupture - surgery Tendon Injuries - surgery Treatment Outcome |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp15KS_pwmxYVCj0UEVkPr5zbtjSEQntKIDch60EDy3rxg9D_1B_ZGdkOa3ropVdJtmXPaOYbeeYTIR-cRCMXSxYSj0wlVTIIIxrmvdpI6XTiBquRv_-orm7Ut1t9e3TUF-aETfTA04c71zImV6qUdONUJWqHp-NKoVPgG69dQusLPm8JpiYbDG7dqKVExlTnPVjq0jDwRwz_dClmVm4os_X_bZOPnNI6YfLIA10-JU9m6Ei305SfkUdxf0p-X9-3FPlB6IBeB5MsIsP9c9wFox04m7uO_sI0tZ42uXQHGvtxN_QUN83pIXZ-BIAY27FfhgOOpQ5aI_W7to8B7h96MDADagjdYv33LsL1EU8Cod14wL8QF9TB9UPXLrWb1IODZHMqPM00ts_JzeXX6y9XbD6BgXkIZAYWkFynEly72KiSO6Eg9vaiMY5vGsOjBrRjlNiAOJKHSDNI7rgMGlnnvOG1fEFO9u0-viJUaVeGOsmqDEbVUtYADYJulOQRKflkQT4tArGHiWjD5gDFVHYSnwXx2Sw-awryGWX2MBJJsnMDqI6dVcf-S3UK8hElbnEpg4y8mysSYMJIimW3hqOPFxwed7YaCUvQr7rfLzpjsQvz1rLcrISIsQbEJqqCvJx06GHOsga4C-CgIGalXauXWvfs735mBnAAyRAnC_X6f3yGN-SxyCsDN6zPyMnQjfEtIK2heZcX1R9c9Cm- priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Two mini transverse-incision repair yields better results than percutaneous repair for acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective case-control study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39085847 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3086955426 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11289924 https://doaj.org/article/53efa14ff5ba4629a8833325fd07c5af |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZ5XHopLX1tmy4qFHooamVLsuVCKZuSEBYSSpuFvQlZltvAst76QZL_1B_ZGa29xDSnnhb08MqeGX0zI80MIW-twE3OR6wouWeylBEDMyJnzslUCKtKrjEa-fwiOVvI-VIt98hQ7qj_gM29ph3Wk1rUqw83v2-_gMB_DgKvk48N7MORZoA2DM-xJNP75BCQKcWKBudyd6oAYK_lEDhz77wROIUc_v_u1HeganyN8g4unT4iD3uFks62HPCY7Pn1E_Ln8rqimDWEtohFePXCM_Sqo2-M1gBBVzW9xctrDc1DQA80Nt2qbSi60unG164DtdFXXTMMB-2WWmj11K2qxhfw_KKBbadFvqEzjApfeZjvsT4IrbsNnk18ohbmt3U1RHRSB7DJ-gvyNCS3fUoWpyeXX89YX5eBOTBvWlZgyp0k5sr6XEbcxhIschfn2vI019wr0IG0jNNYlaUD-7MQ3HJRKMxF5zTPxDNysK7W_gWhUtmoyEqRRIWWmRAZKAyFyqXgHhP1iQl5PxDEbLbpN0wwW3RituQzQD4TyGf0hBwjzXYjMXV2aKjqn6aXRKOEL20ky1LlViZxZrHcsoC1Fjx1ypYT8g4pbpDlgEbO9nEKsGBMlWVmmiPyxxz-7mg0EgTTjbrfDDxjsAtvswW6GQF2ZAZ6XJxMyPMtD-3WLDJQgkFlmBA94q7RS4171le_Ql5wUJ3Beo7ly_-f-oo8iIM8oPP6iBy0dedfg9bV5lOyny7TKTmczeY_5vB7fHLx7fs0-DCmQcz-AiLPNMU |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two+mini+transverse-incision+repair+yields+better+results+than+percutaneous+repair+for+acute+closed+midsubstance+Achilles+tendon+rupture%3A+a+retrospective+case-control+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Jin%2C+Wen+Tao&rft.au=Huang%2C+Li+Fang&rft.au=Guo%2C+Hai+Hua&rft.au=Wang%2C+Lei&rft.date=2024-07-31&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=19&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-024-04904-8&rft.externalDocID=PMC11289924 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |