Systematic Early Urinary Catheter Removal Integrated in the Full Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol After Laparoscopic Mid to Lower Rectal Cancer Excision: A Feasibility Study
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway an...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of coloproctology Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 204 - 211 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Korean Society of Coloproctology
01.08.2021
대한대장항문학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway and identified predictive factors for failure of this strategy.
Between March 2017 and October 2018, all unselected and consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and benefited from our ERAS program were included. Urinary complications (infection and retention) were prospectively recorded. Success was defined as catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3 without urinary complications.
Of 135 patients (male, 63.7%; neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 57.0%; urology history, 17.8%), 120 had early urinary catheter removal with no complications (success rate, 88.9%), 8 did not have urinary catheter removal on POD 3 due to clinical judgment or prescription error, 5 experienced a urinary tract infection, and 2 had acute urinary retention. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; P = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification > II (OR, 0.28; P = 0.048), antiaggregant platelet medication (OR, 0.12; P < 0.001), absence of anastomosis (OR, 0.1; P = 0.003), and prolonged operative time (OR, 0.21; P = 0.020) were predictive factors for failure. Conversely, optimal compliance with the ERAS program (OR, 7.68; P < 0.001), postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR, 21.71; P < 0.001), and balanced intravenous fluid therapy (OR, 7.87; P = 0.001) were associated with increased strategy success.
Withdrawal of the urinary catheter on POD 3 was successfully achieved after laparoscopic rectal resection and can be safely implemented in the ERAS program. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway and identified predictive factors for failure of this strategy.
Between March 2017 and October 2018, all unselected and consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and benefited from our ERAS program were included. Urinary complications (infection and retention) were prospectively recorded. Success was defined as catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3 without urinary complications.
Of 135 patients (male, 63.7%; neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 57.0%; urology history, 17.8%), 120 had early urinary catheter removal with no complications (success rate, 88.9%), 8 did not have urinary catheter removal on POD 3 due to clinical judgment or prescription error, 5 experienced a urinary tract infection, and 2 had acute urinary retention. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; P = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification > II (OR, 0.28; P = 0.048), antiaggregant platelet medication (OR, 0.12; P < 0.001), absence of anastomosis (OR, 0.1; P = 0.003), and prolonged operative time (OR, 0.21; P = 0.020) were predictive factors for failure. Conversely, optimal compliance with the ERAS program (OR, 7.68; P < 0.001), postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR, 21.71; P < 0.001), and balanced intravenous fluid therapy (OR, 7.87; P = 0.001) were associated with increased strategy success.
Withdrawal of the urinary catheter on POD 3 was successfully achieved after laparoscopic rectal resection and can be safely implemented in the ERAS program. Purpose Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway and identified predictive factors for failure of this strategy. Methods Between March 2017 and October 2018, all unselected and consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and benefited from our ERAS program were included. Urinary complications (infection and retention) were prospectively recorded. Success was defined as catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3 without urinary complications. Results Of 135 patients (male, 63.7%; neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 57.0%; urology history, 17.8%), 120 had early urinary catheter removal with no complications (success rate, 88.9%), 8 did not have urinary catheter removal on POD 3 due to clinical judgment or prescription error, 5 experienced a urinary tract infection, and 2 had acute urinary retention. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; P = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification > II (OR, 0.28; P = 0.048), antiaggregant platelet medication (OR, 0.12; P < 0.001), absence of anastomosis (OR, 0.1; P = 0.003), and prolonged operative time (OR, 0.21; P = 0.020) were predictive factors for failure. Conversely, optimal compliance with the ERAS program (OR, 7.68; P < 0.001), postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR, 21.71; P < 0.001), and balanced intravenous fluid therapy (OR, 7.87; P = 0.001) were associated with increased strategy success. Conclusion Withdrawal of the urinary catheter on POD 3 was successfully achieved after laparoscopic rectal resection and can be safely implemented in the ERAS program. PURPOSEEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway and identified predictive factors for failure of this strategy. METHODSBetween March 2017 and October 2018, all unselected and consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and benefited from our ERAS program were included. Urinary complications (infection and retention) were prospectively recorded. Success was defined as catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3 without urinary complications. RESULTSOf 135 patients (male, 63.7%; neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 57.0%; urology history, 17.8%), 120 had early urinary catheter removal with no complications (success rate, 88.9%), 8 did not have urinary catheter removal on POD 3 due to clinical judgment or prescription error, 5 experienced a urinary tract infection, and 2 had acute urinary retention. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; P = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification > II (OR, 0.28; P = 0.048), antiaggregant platelet medication (OR, 0.12; P < 0.001), absence of anastomosis (OR, 0.1; P = 0.003), and prolonged operative time (OR, 0.21; P = 0.020) were predictive factors for failure. Conversely, optimal compliance with the ERAS program (OR, 7.68; P < 0.001), postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR, 21.71; P < 0.001), and balanced intravenous fluid therapy (OR, 7.87; P = 0.001) were associated with increased strategy success. CONCLUSIONWithdrawal of the urinary catheter on POD 3 was successfully achieved after laparoscopic rectal resection and can be safely implemented in the ERAS program. Purpose: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of the early urinary catheter removal protocol after rectal cancer surgery within an ERAS pathway and identified predictive factors for failure of this strategy.Methods: Between March 2017 and October 2018, all unselected and consecutive patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and benefited from our ERAS program were included. Urinary complications (infection and retention) were prospectively recorded. Success was defined as catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 3 without urinary complications.Results: Of 135 patients (male, 63.7%; neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 57.0%; urology history, 17.8%), 120 had early urinary catheter removal with no complications (success rate, 88.9%), 8 did not have urinary catheter removal on POD 3 due to clinical judgment or prescription error, 5 experienced a urinary tract infection, and 2 had acute urinary retention. Obesity (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; P = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification > II (OR, 0.28; P = 0.048), antiaggregant platelet medication (OR, 0.12; P < 0.001), absence of anastomosis (OR, 0.1; P = 0.003), and prolonged operative time (OR, 0.21; P = 0.020) were predictive factors for failure. Conversely, optimal compliance with the ERAS program (OR, 7.68; P < 0.001), postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR, 21.71; P < 0.001), and balanced intravenous fluid therapy (OR, 7.87; P = 0.001) were associated with increased strategy success.Conclusion: Withdrawal of the urinary catheter on POD 3 was successfully achieved after laparoscopic rectal resection and can be safely implemented in the ERAS program. KCI Citation Count: 1 |
Author | Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence Lelong, Bernard Brun, Clément Bonnet, Julien de Chaisemartin, Cécile Magallon, Cloé Meillat, Hélène Faucher, Marion |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hélène surname: Meillat fullname: Meillat, Hélène organization: Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Cloé surname: Magallon fullname: Magallon, Cloé organization: Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 3 givenname: Clément surname: Brun fullname: Brun, Clément organization: Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 4 givenname: Cécile surname: de Chaisemartin fullname: de Chaisemartin, Cécile organization: Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 5 givenname: Laurence surname: Moureau-Zabotto fullname: Moureau-Zabotto, Laurence organization: Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 6 givenname: Julien surname: Bonnet fullname: Bonnet, Julien organization: Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 7 givenname: Marion surname: Faucher fullname: Faucher, Marion organization: Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France – sequence: 8 givenname: Bernard surname: Lelong fullname: Lelong, Bernard organization: Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002744891$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNpVUk1vEzEQXaEiWkKPXJGP7SHBH-tdLwekKEogUhAoac_WrNdO3G7s4HUC-W_8OJwPIurL2DNv3huN39vsynmns-w9wQPGKvYR1IBiigeYDyh9ld1QKsp-VVJ6dbmT_Dq77bonnI4oy4rmb7JrxoQoBeE32Z_Fvot6DdEqNIbQ7tFjsA7CHo0grnTUAc312u-gRVMX9TJA1A2yDqUimmzbFo3dCpxKyblWfqdT59Ac2hbbsDy87sbz4eIe_Qg-euXbc3UGGwi-U36ThL_ZBkWPZv7XUU7FpDY6kAY0_q1sZ737hIZooqGztW1t3KNF3Db7d9lrA22nb8-xlz1Oxg-jr_3Z9y_T0XDWV7koY7-qQDWGGYELwJWphFLAOW0azgtj6rIhuOa10hQKUjSE8xrntah5VWsmjMasl92feF0w8llZ6cEe49LL5yCH84eprAQneVEm7PSEbTw8yU2w67TMY8Mx4cNSQkjbbrUkDFhpBOimqHKtGJBCVEaRsuaYl1gkrs8nrs22XutGaRcDtC9IX1acXaWZdlKwiuBkkF52dyYI_udWd1Gubad024LTfttJyongOWeMJ2j_BFXpW7qgzUWGYHkwmwQlD2aTmEtKE_7D_7Nd0P-sxf4CVJ_URA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_5534_wjmh_230335 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_03064_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_023_04460_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_1006 crossref_primary_10_12771_emj_2023_e23 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10151_024_02950_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/codi.12124 10.1097/dcr.0b013e318280aad5 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.032 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.089 10.1007/s10350-006-0686-z 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000317 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.012 10.1016/s0039-6060(99)70256-4 10.1056/nejm197408012910501 10.1007/s003840050038 10.1097/sla.0000000000000838 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001206 10.1177/000313481207801020 10.1213/ane.0b013e318257a380 10.3109/00365598609024494 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-w 10.1007/s00464-018-6572-7 10.1002/bjs.4867 10.1186/s12871-016-0223-0 10.1007/s00268-014-2767-9 10.1002/14651858.cd004203.pub3 10.1007/bf02049890 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2021 |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR |
DOI | 10.3393/ac.2020.05.22 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2287-9722 |
EndPage | 211 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9851467 oai_doaj_org_article_13a37f8aed694ec3a1689fc17b505708 10_3393_ac_2020_05_22 33887815 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 5-W 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAKDD ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL DIK EF. GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 M~E NPM OK1 PGMZT RPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM ACYCR ADRAZ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-99acdf3f806a09f98cca552dd556ffb7d10b5bce2a616d155b04b8b59be38fe03 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2287-9714 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:42:21 EST 2023 Tue Oct 22 15:02:06 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:32:36 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 01:27:55 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:34:47 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:23:34 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Colorectal surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Urinary retention Surgical oncology |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c487t-99acdf3f806a09f98cca552dd556ffb7d10b5bce2a616d155b04b8b59be38fe03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4548-6481 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391039/ |
PMID | 33887815 |
PQID | 2518545335 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9851467 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_13a37f8aed694ec3a1689fc17b505708 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8391039 proquest_miscellaneous_2518545335 crossref_primary_10_3393_ac_2020_05_22 pubmed_primary_33887815 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2021 text: 2021-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Annals of coloproctology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Coloproctol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology 대한대장항문학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Society of Coloproctology – name: 대한대장항문학회 |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 Zmora (ref14) 2010 Baeriswyl (ref24) 2015 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 Nygren (ref5) 2012 |
References_xml | – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1111/codi.12124 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1097/dcr.0b013e318280aad5 – start-page: 1640 volume-title: The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in adult patients: a meta-analysis year: 2015 ident: ref24 contributor: fullname: Baeriswyl – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.032 – start-page: 321 volume-title: Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery: is it necessary for that long? year: 2010 ident: ref14 contributor: fullname: Zmora – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.089 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0686-z – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000317 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.012 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(99)70256-4 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1056/nejm197408012910501 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1007/s003840050038 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000838 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001206 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1177/000313481207801020 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318257a380 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.3109/00365598609024494 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-w – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6572-7 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1002/bjs.4867 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0223-0 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2767-9 – start-page: 801 volume-title: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations year: 2012 ident: ref5 contributor: fullname: Nygren – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd004203.pub3 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1007/bf02049890 |
SSID | ssj0000877924 |
Score | 2.314624 |
Snippet | Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration remains... Purpose: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration... PURPOSEEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration... Purpose Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs advocate early urinary catheter removal after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal duration... |
SourceID | nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 204 |
SubjectTerms | colorectal surgery enhanced recovery after surgery, urinary retention Original surgical oncology 일반외과학 |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Li9RAEG5kT15E8RVflCKih7BJdzrp9jbKLLuyK7LjwN6a7qTbHRaTJWbB-W_-OKs6mWFGBC-eAuk8Oqkvqa_oqq8Ye12pkhZjQupD1qRFnelUe1-kZeAIKC5rl1Oh8Nnn8nhZfLqQFzutvignbJQHHl_cYS6sqIKyvil14Wth81LpUOeVI2o9lflmeieYiv9gVVU6drTlGBKkusqLUWBTCC0OLWkX8owkOznfc0hRtx_dTNuHv1HOPzMnd1zR0V12Z-KQMBvnfo_d8u199mux1WSGqFoMyz7W2kIs8sPXB-f-e4fAgpONREQDqxZwECgQhXl7GdMBgEJSRPgaZtRAHBZj5TS8nZ_PFu_gS98NHcJnGj1Fb0uKmN013vhs1cDQwSm1XqPLILPH2-NFe5j_HJv5vIcZIO-csnLXQImM6wdseTT_-vE4nVozpDVGOEOqta2bIILKSpvpoBUCQUreNFKWIbiqyTMnHTUbK_OyQc7issIpJ7XzQgWfiYfsoO1a_5gBd85LgcyvsRirq8o6ToIxWuVCFbVTCXuzsY-5HhU4DEYuZEhja0OGNJk0nCfsA1lvexAJZ8cdCCczwcn8C04Je4W2N1f1Kp5P22-dueoNhhcnRiM_Rc-SsJcbaBj8GmmJxba-u_lhkC0q5KRCyIQ9GqGynY8Q-ENXOY5UeyDam_D-SLu6jIrfyGJpyf7J_3jCp-w2p7ycmMT4jB0M_Y1_jsRqcC_iN_QblSQhVQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fb9MwELbQeOEFgfhVBuhACMFDILHjxEZCqKBOG9oQWqm0NyuO7a0aJCPrpPV_44_jzkkLhT3wFClu7ch39n2ffP6OseelKugwJiQ-pC7J61Qn2vs8KQJHh-KythldFD74XOzO8k9H8ui3pNAwgedXUjuqJzXrvr2-_LF8jwv-HTFOocWbiqQIeUoKnBx34-s8R5JOWXwD0o-bsipLHUvccuQIiS6zvFfc_LeHjQgVhfwx7jRduAqD_p1K-Uds2rnFbg6gEsa9F9xm13xzh_2crkWaIcoYw6yLl28h3vrD-YRD_71FT4O9lWaEg3kD2AjETGHSnMT8ACCOii6_hDFVFIdpf5UaXk4Ox9NX8KVrFy3609C6j-GXJDLbMxz4YO5g0cI-1WKjbnCWcXjstIPJZV_d5y2MAYHokKa7BMpsXN5ls53J14-7yVCrIamR8iwSravaBRFUWlSpDlqhZ0jJnZOyCMGWLkuttFR9rMgKhyDGprlVVmrrhQo-FffYVtM2_gEDbq2XAqGgq5C8q7KynBRktMqEymurRuzFyj7mrJfkMEhlyJCmqg0Z0qTScD5iH8h66x-RknZ80XbHZliYJhOVKIOqvCt07mtRZYXSoc5KS9QtxdGeoe3NaT2P_6fncWtOO4N8Y89oBKwYakbs6co1DC5POnOpGt9enBuEjwpBqhByxO73rrL-HiFwh1cZtpQbTrTxwZstzfwkSoAjrKUz_If_OxXb7AanZJyYufiIbS26C_8Y0dTCPonr5BeWPh4e priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Systematic Early Urinary Catheter Removal Integrated in the Full Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol After Laparoscopic Mid to Lower Rectal Cancer Excision: A Feasibility Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887815 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2518545335 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8391039 https://doaj.org/article/13a37f8aed694ec3a1689fc17b505708 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002744891 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Annals of Coloproctolgy, 2021, 37(4), , pp.204-211 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELa2PfGCQPwqsMkghOAha2LHic1bmTptaEXTSqW9WbFjb9VoUmWdRP83_jjunKRqEU-8tFLdxFbvc--7-O47Qj7kMsPDGB85H5dRamMVKefSKPMMAMWENQkWCk--Z2ez9Nu1uN4joq-FCUn71syPq5-L42p-G3Irlws77PPEhpeTE3DqeII53Cf7ANCtED38_co8V6GZLYNoIFJ5krbampwrPixQtpDFqNbJsJMNRGgyl9gUd8stBfV-cDZV4_9FPP_On9xySKdPyOOOSdJRu-KnZM9Vz8jv6UaZmQbtYjprQsUtDaV-8CPSK7eoAV70vBeKKOm8ojBIMRyl4-o2JAVQDEwB52s6wjbidNrWT9NP46vR9DO9bOpVDSDqRi_A56IuZr2EiSfzkq5qeoEN2PA2wO9herhpQ8e_2pY-X-iIAvvscnPXFNMZ18_J7HT84-Qs6ho0RBbinFWkVGFLz72MsyJWXkmAgxCsLIXIvDd5mcRGGGw5liVZCczFxKmRRijjuPQu5i_IQVVX7hWhzBgnOPC_soCIXeaFYSgbo2TCZWqNHJCPvX30stXh0BC_oE11YTXaVMdCMzYgX9F6my-hfHb4oG5udAcinfCC514WrsxU6iwvkkwqb5PcYLwWw2zvwfb6zs7D9fh-U-u7RkOQca4VsFTwLwPyroeGhj2JBy1F5eqHew2cUQIz5VwMyMsWKpv19IAbkHwHRDsL3h2BbRB0vzvYv_7vK9-QRwxTckL-4ltysGoe3CFwqpU5Cs8i4HWSyqOwn_4AHKoj2g |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,2228,24330,27936,27937,53804,53806 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nj9MwELWW5QAXBOKrfBqEEByyTeI4sbmVVVcttKvVdivtzYode7damlShK9H_xo9jxkmqFnHiFKluYivznJknz7wh5EMmUjyMcYF1YREkJpSBtDYJUhcDoGJudISFwtPTdDRPvl3yywPCu1oYn7Rv9OKo_LE8KhfXPrdytTT9Lk-sfzY9BqeOJ5j9O-Qu7Ncw2SHp_gMsskz6drYx8IFAZlHSqGsyJlk_R-HCOES9zhh72QBHE5nAtrg7jsnr94O7KWv3r9Dz7wzKHZd08pA8aGNJOmjW_Igc2PIx-T3bajNTr15M57WvuaW-2A9eIz23ywoARsedVERBFyWFQYqElA7La58WQJGaAtI3dICNxOmsqaCmn4bng9lnelZX6wpg1I5OwOuiMma1gomni4KuKzrBFmz4GIjwYXp4aE2Hv5qmPl_ogEL82WbnbigmNG6ekPnJ8OJ4FLQtGgIDTGcdSJmbwjEnwjQPpZMCAMF5XBScp87prIhCzTU2HUujtIDYRYeJFppLbZlwNmRPyWFZlfY5obHWljOIAIscOLvIch2jcIwUEROJ0aJHPnb2UatGiUMBg0GbqtwotKkKuYrjHvmK1tv-CQW0_Q9VfaVaGKmI5SxzIrdFKhNrWB6lQjoTZRoZWwizvQfbqxuz8Pfj9apSN7UCmjFWEuJU8DA98q6DhoJdiUcteWmr258KokYBsSljvEeeNVDZrqcDXI9keyDaW_D-CGwEr_zdAv_Ff9_5ltwbXUwnajI-_f6S3I8xQcdnM74ih-v61r6GCGut3_j99AfbeyVh |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1db9MwFLVgSIgXBOKr2wCDEIKHrIkdJzZvZbRaoZ2qlUp7s-LE3qrRpAqdRP8bP457nbRqEU88VaqbxMo97j1Hvj6XkHepTHAzxgXWhUUQ56EKlLVxkDgGgGIiNxEeFB6fJ2ez-OuluNxp9eWL9nMzPyl_LE7K-bWvrVwu8u6mTqw7GZ9CUscdzO6ycN275B6s2TDZEer-T1imqfItbRlogkClUdw4bHKueDdD80IWomcnw342oNNkKrE17k5y8h7-kHLK2v2Lfv5dRbmTlgaPyMOWT9JeM-_H5I4tn5Df060_M_UOxnRW-3O31B_4g1dJL-yiApDR4cYuoqDzksIgRVFK--W1Lw2gKE8B7Wvaw2bidNqcoqYf-he96Uc6qatVBVBqR0eQedEds1rCg8fzgq4qOsI2bHgbYPnweLhpTfu_msY-n2iPAgdtK3TXFIsa10_JbND_fnoWtG0aghzUzipQKssLxx0EIQuVUxJAIQQrCiES50xaRKERBhuPJVFSAH8xYWykEcpYLp0N-TNyUFalfUEoM8YKDiywyEC3yzQzDM1jlIy4jHMjO-T9Jj562bhxaFAxGFOd5RpjqkOhGeuQzxi97Y_QRNt_UdVXuoWSjnjGUyczWyQqtjnPokQql0epQdUWwtPeQuz1TT731-PnVaVvag1SY6gVcFXIMh3yZgMNDSsTt1uy0la3PzUwRwn8lHPRIc8bqGznswFch6R7INqb8P4ILAbv_t2C__C_r3xN7k--DPRoeP7tiDxgWKPjCxqPycGqvrUvgWStzCu_nP4AAj4mdA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic+Early+Urinary+Catheter+Removal+Integrated+in+the+Full+Enhanced+Recovery+After+Surgery+%28ERAS%29+Protocol+After+Laparoscopic+Mid+to+Lower+Rectal+Cancer+Excision%3A+A+Feasibility+Study&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+coloproctology&rft.au=Meillat%2C+H%C3%A9l%C3%A8ne&rft.au=Magallon%2C+Clo%C3%A9&rft.au=Brun%2C+Cl%C3%A9ment&rft.au=de+Chaisemartin%2C+C%C3%A9cile&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.issn=2287-9714&rft.eissn=2287-9722&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=211&rft_id=info:doi/10.3393%2Fac.2020.05.22&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3393_ac_2020_05_22 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2287-9714&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2287-9714&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2287-9714&client=summon |