Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis
Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents bef...
Saved in:
Published in | Gastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 72; no. 6; pp. 1138 - 1145 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Maryland heights, MO
Mosby, Inc
01.12.2010
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate.
To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB.
Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).
From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences.
The results are limited by the small number of subjects.
Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. Objective To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Design and Setting Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). Results From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. Limitations The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Conclusions Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes. Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes. Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes. Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate.BACKGROUNDRecent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate.To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB.OBJECTIVETo assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB.Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).DESIGN AND SETTINGComprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences.RESULTSFrom 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences.The results are limited by the small number of subjects.LIMITATIONSThe results are limited by the small number of subjects.Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.CONCLUSIONSIntravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes. |
Author | Sung, Joseph J.Y. Barkun, Alan N. Gralnek, Ian M. Bardou, Marc Martel, Myriam |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Alan N. surname: Barkun fullname: Barkun, Alan N. – sequence: 2 givenname: Marc surname: Bardou fullname: Bardou, Marc – sequence: 3 givenname: Myriam surname: Martel fullname: Martel, Myriam – sequence: 4 givenname: Ian M. surname: Gralnek fullname: Gralnek, Ian M. – sequence: 5 givenname: Joseph J.Y. surname: Sung fullname: Sung, Joseph J.Y. |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23687279$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20970794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkt9rFDEQx4NU7LX6B_gi-yI-7XWS_ZGNQkGK1kKhBRV8C9nJbMl1L3smWeH-e3PcqVBofcoEPt8J88mcsCM_eWLsNYclB96erZZ3jpYC8h26JXD-jC04KFm2UqojtoAMlQ0HecxOYlwBQCcq_oIdiwyBVPWCydsw3TtPyWEsnC8MzomKebOhUFxeFf1IZJ2_e1-YYk3JlMabcRtdfMmeD2aM9OpwnrLvnz99u_hSXt9cXl18vC6x7mQqm7ayygiFVgmrumGoOGBvZY8gsa5Nb0XbVvVgseJG9tVQY9cIbmuRi55jdcre7ftuwvRzppj02kWkcTSepjnqjjdNLQHaTL45kHO_Jqs3wa1N2Oo_s2bg7QEwEc04BOPRxX9c1XZSSJU5vucwTDEGGv4iHPTOu17p7F3vvGvodPaeM_JBBl0yyU0-BePGJ5Mf9knKFn85CjqiI49ZeyBM2k7uyfT5gzSOzrs83j1tKa6mOeQPi5rrKDTor7uN2C0Ez4Vq5Y_cQD3e4D-P_wYFTcJa |
CODEN | GAENBQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastrohep_2015_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2020_02_028 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000001245 crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2015_48_2_121 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_12_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1542_neo_24_6_e403 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_03_005 crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2019_046 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_022_07698_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_014_0173_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpmfor_2021_10_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_32404_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_019_0283_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_015_0077_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpha_2021_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013176_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2014_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_018_0192_0 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_05_095 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000002927 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2014_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1586_egh_12_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2014_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2011_480 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001907 crossref_primary_10_3390_gastroent15010001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_disamonth_2018_02_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_life14040526 crossref_primary_10_1155_2012_361425 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2014_384 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11654_015_0362_7 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0034_1366210 crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640614557319 crossref_primary_10_17941_agd_440452 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2014_235 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2013_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vgie_2019_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_57913_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_07_057 crossref_primary_10_17235_reed_2016_4240_2016 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1369_5274 crossref_primary_10_18699_SSMJ20210601 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9020402 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cld_2018_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_goad011 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2036_2011_04708_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_02_008 crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2015_48_2_106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2011_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2011_260 crossref_primary_10_1186_2110_5820_2_46 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_14222 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000000343 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2022_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1186_1749_7922_9_45 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_01_013 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002620 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13546_012_0489_2 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000000321 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojgas_2014_44028 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_13_60596_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2015_01_015 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2018_02_023 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCC_0000000000000185 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10049_022_01091_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_01_059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_02_033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastre_2016_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2223_1028 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1939_4887 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5 10.2307/2533446 10.1007/BF01708583 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.041 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00582.x 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009 10.1155/2005/198387 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02543-4 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.652 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30272.x 10.14309/00000434-200709002-01114 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4 10.1053/gast.2002.34230 10.1002/sim.1186 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<841::AID-SIM781>3.0.CO;2-D 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70174-0 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80270-7 10.1056/NEJMra0706113 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03516.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy – notice: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6779 |
EndPage | 1145 |
ExternalDocumentID | 20970794 23687279 10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 S001651071001967X 1_s2_0_S001651071001967X |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Olympus – fundername: AstraZeneca |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FD8 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDZ HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LZ1 M28 M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OC. ON0 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UNMZH UV1 WH7 WOW X7M Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-563d9a29cd92d98ff310cbd7bc07c44abd26634fdc31a7b3f4c8521d424c8b1c3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
IngestDate | Tue Aug 05 10:14:45 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:32:25 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:27 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:45:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:35 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:02 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:32:04 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | OR UGIB CI WMD upper GI bleeding weighted mean difference confidence interval odds ratio Digestive diseases Intestinal disease Gastrointestinal bleeding Acute |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c487t-563d9a29cd92d98ff310cbd7bc07c44abd26634fdc31a7b3f4c8521d424c8b1c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 20970794 |
PQID | 815547006 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_815547006 pubmed_primary_20970794 pascalfrancis_primary_23687279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S001651071001967X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2010 text: 2010-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Maryland heights, MO |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Maryland heights, MO – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gastrointest Endosc |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | Mosby, Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mosby, Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Haefeli, Schoenenberger, Weiss (bib22) 1992; 18 Pogue, Yusuf (bib23) 1998; 351 Gralnek, Barkun, Bardou (bib3) 2008; 359 Barkun, Bardou, Kuipers (bib5) 2010; 152 Barkun, Sabbah, Enns (bib2) 2004; 99 Moher, Cook, Eastwood (bib16) 1999; 354 Dickersin, Scherer, Lefebvre (bib9) 1994; 309 Aljebreen, Fallone, Barkun (bib1) 2004; 59 Frossard, Spahr, Queneau (bib8) 2002; 123 Gupta, Sonpal, Patel (bib19) 2008; 67 Sussman, Deshpande, Parra (bib17) 2008; 67 Coffin, Pocard, Panis (bib7) 2002; 56 Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider (bib15) 1997; 315 Hardy, Thompson (bib12) 1998; 17 Williams, Higgins, Brayne (bib13) 2006; 91 Winstead, Wilcox (bib24) 2007; 26 Jadad, Moore, Carroll (bib10) 1996; 17 Carbonell, Pauwels, Serfaty (bib6) 2006; 101 Itoh, Nakaya, Suzuki (bib21) 1984; 247 Bensoussan, Fallone, Barkun (bib4) 2005; 19 Higgins, Thompson (bib11) 2002; 21 Begg, Mazumdar (bib14) 1994; 50 Sears, Duckworth, Balaban (bib18) 1996; 43 Habashi, Lambiase, Kottoor (bib20) 2007; 102 Bensoussan (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib4) 2005; 19 Moher (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib16) 1999; 354 Habashi (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib20) 2007; 102 Barkun (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib5) 2010; 152 Williams (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib13) 2006; 91 Sears (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib18) 1996; 43 Barkun (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib2) 2004; 99 Winstead (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib24) 2007; 26 Higgins (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib11) 2002; 21 Dickersin (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib9) 1994; 309 Carbonell (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib6) 2006; 101 Itoh (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib21) 1984; 247 Haefeli (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib22) 1992; 18 Gralnek (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib3) 2008; 359 Sussman (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib17) 2008; 67 Hardy (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib12) 1998; 17 Aljebreen (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib1) 2004; 59 Gupta (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib19) 2008; 67 Jadad (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib10) 1996; 17 Frossard (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib8) 2002; 123 Begg (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib14) 1994; 50 Pogue (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib23) 1998; 351 Coffin (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib7) 2002; 56 Egger (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib15) 1997; 315 21704823 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):234; author reply 234-5 |
References_xml | – volume: 354 start-page: 1896 year: 1999 end-page: 1900 ident: bib16 article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement publication-title: Lancet – volume: 359 start-page: 928 year: 2008 end-page: 937 ident: bib3 article-title: Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 123 start-page: 17 year: 2002 end-page: 23 ident: bib8 article-title: Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 67 start-page: AB247 year: 2008 ident: bib17 article-title: Intravenous metoclopramide to increase mucosal visualization during endoscopy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled study [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 59 start-page: 172 year: 2004 end-page: 178 ident: bib1 article-title: Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 67 start-page: AB81 year: 2008 end-page: AB82 ident: bib19 article-title: Prokinetic agent- metoclopromide increases the yield of upper endoscopy and decreases the need for second look endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed a randomized prospective study [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 309 start-page: 1286 year: 1994 end-page: 1291 ident: bib9 article-title: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews publication-title: BMJ – volume: 91 start-page: 8 year: 2006 end-page: 15 ident: bib13 article-title: Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders publication-title: Arch Dis Child – volume: 50 start-page: 1088 year: 1994 end-page: 1101 ident: bib14 article-title: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 99 start-page: 1238 year: 2004 end-page: 1246 ident: bib2 article-title: The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 247 start-page: G688 year: 1984 end-page: G694 ident: bib21 article-title: Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog publication-title: Am J Physiol – volume: 56 start-page: 174 year: 2002 end-page: 179 ident: bib7 article-title: Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 102 start-page: S526 year: 2007 ident: bib20 article-title: Prokinetics infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind & placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 18 start-page: 469 year: 1992 end-page: 473 ident: bib22 article-title: Possible risk for cardiac arrhythmia related to intravenous erythromycin publication-title: Intensive Care Med – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 1996 end-page: 12 ident: bib10 article-title: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? publication-title: Control Clin Trials – volume: 26 start-page: 1371 year: 2007 end-page: 1377 ident: bib24 article-title: Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 19 start-page: 487 year: 2005 end-page: 495 ident: bib4 article-title: A sampling of Canadian practice in managing nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding before recent guideline publication: is there room for improvement? publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol – volume: 152 start-page: 101 year: 2010 end-page: 113 ident: bib5 article-title: International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 17 start-page: 841 year: 1998 end-page: 856 ident: bib12 article-title: Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 315 start-page: 629 year: 1997 end-page: 634 ident: bib15 article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test publication-title: BMJ – volume: 43 start-page: 358 year: 1996 ident: bib18 article-title: Erythromycin versus gastric lavage for preendoscopic preparation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 101 start-page: 1211 year: 2006 end-page: 1215 ident: bib6 article-title: Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 21 start-page: 1539 year: 2002 end-page: 1558 ident: bib11 article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 351 start-page: 47 year: 1998 end-page: 52 ident: bib23 article-title: Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials publication-title: Lancet – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib10 article-title: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? publication-title: Control Clin Trials doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 – volume: 354 start-page: 1896 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib16 article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5 – volume: 50 start-page: 1088 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib14 article-title: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2533446 – volume: 18 start-page: 469 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib22 article-title: Possible risk for cardiac arrhythmia related to intravenous erythromycin publication-title: Intensive Care Med doi: 10.1007/BF01708583 – volume: 67 start-page: AB81 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib19 article-title: Prokinetic agent- metoclopromide increases the yield of upper endoscopy and decreases the need for second look endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed a randomized prospective study [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.041 – volume: 101 start-page: 1211 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib6 article-title: Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00582.x – volume: 91 start-page: 8 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib13 article-title: Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders publication-title: Arch Dis Child doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 – volume: 152 start-page: 101 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib5 article-title: International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009 – volume: 19 start-page: 487 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib4 article-title: A sampling of Canadian practice in managing nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding before recent guideline publication: is there room for improvement? publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1155/2005/198387 – volume: 59 start-page: 172 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib1 article-title: Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02543-4 – volume: 67 start-page: AB247 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib17 article-title: Intravenous metoclopramide to increase mucosal visualization during endoscopy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled study [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.652 – volume: 99 start-page: 1238 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib2 article-title: The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30272.x – volume: 102 start-page: S526 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib20 article-title: Prokinetics infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind & placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.14309/00000434-200709002-01114 – volume: 351 start-page: 47 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib23 article-title: Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4 – volume: 123 start-page: 17 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib8 article-title: Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34230 – volume: 21 start-page: 1539 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib11 article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.1186 – volume: 17 start-page: 841 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib12 article-title: Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<841::AID-SIM781>3.0.CO;2-D – volume: 56 start-page: 174 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib7 article-title: Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70174-0 – volume: 309 start-page: 1286 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib9 article-title: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286 – volume: 315 start-page: 629 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib15 article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 – volume: 247 start-page: G688 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib21 article-title: Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog publication-title: Am J Physiol – volume: 43 start-page: 358 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib18 article-title: Erythromycin versus gastric lavage for preendoscopic preparation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding [abstract] publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80270-7 – volume: 359 start-page: 928 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib3 article-title: Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706113 – volume: 26 start-page: 1371 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib24 article-title: Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03516.x – reference: 21704823 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):234; author reply 234-5 |
SSID | ssj0008231 |
Score | 2.3376896 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are... Background Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1138 |
SubjectTerms | Acute Disease Biological and medical sciences Blood Transfusion Digestive system. Abdomen Duodenal Diseases - diagnosis Duodenal Diseases - therapy Endoscopy Endoscopy, Digestive System Erythromycin - administration & dosage Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis Esophageal Diseases - therapy Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Metoclopramide - administration & dosage Other diseases. Semiology Premedication Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Stomach Diseases - diagnosis Stomach Diseases - therapy Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus |
Title | Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S001651071001967X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S001651071001967X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20970794 https://www.proquest.com/docview/815547006 |
Volume | 72 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB7ygFIoJX27TRYdeio4sSWtLfUWQpNNS0IPDexN6OWybeo1a-81vz2jtewS2qTQmzAeLA-jbz4xL4D3Fc0qLsw0Fd6ylCPlTwXLdBhmxgukwDozoVD44rKYXfHP8-l8C06GWpiQVhmxv8f0DVrHJ0dRm0fNYhFqfPMCLSq0p0EzKufbsEuZLNC0d4_Pv8wuR0AOka4ekIs0CAzBzU2a1_eFjwle4jDL8_vc05NGt6i0qp92cT8d3bil0z14GvkkOe63_Ay2fP0cHl3EiPkLKL-ulj9xFboxk0VNtF13nqybxq_I2Tkx1733-kg0-eU7nerYpOQlXJ1--nYyS-OwhNTinaNLpwVzUlNpnaROiqpC3maNK43NSsu5Ng5dMeOVsyzXpWEVtwJdt-MUFya37BXs1MvavwGCNw5NK-HLQofQb6aNnQrmpbPSiULSBLJBR8rGTuJhoMW1GlLGfihUqwpqVWHIZZ4n8GEUafo2Gg-9TAfFq6E-FBFNIcg_JFT-Tci38Uy2KlctVZn6w24S4KPkHdP71wcnd2xi_C_KCoGsUCZABiNReGZDIEbXfrlulQgkrkS8S-B1bzy_hTMZehbyt_-3qXfwmI75Nvuw063W_gBZU2cmsH14k0_i2bgFf0YR9g |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIkElhHiWFCg-cEJK69jexO4NVZQtdCsOrbQ3y3acammbjTbZK7-d8cbZqoIWiZsVeWRnNI_PmhfAx4rRSkg7SqV3PBUI-VPJqQnDzESOENhQGwqFJ6f5-Fx8m46mG3A41MKEtMpo-3ubvrLW8ct-5OZ-M5uFGt8sR4kK7WlQjIrpA3goUH2Ddu79usnzCHGu3hznadg-hDZXSV4XMx_Tu-QezbK7nNOTxrTIsqqfdXE3GF05paNn8DSiSfK5v_Bz2PD1C3g0ifHyl1D8WMwvcRV6MZNZTYxbdp4sm8YvyNdjYq9633VADLn2nUlNbFHyCs6PvpwdjtM4KiF1-OLo0lHOS2WYcqVipZJVhajN2bKwjhZOCGNLdMRcVKXjmSksr4ST6LhLwXBhM8dfw2Y9r_0bIPjeMKySvshNCPxSY91Icq9Kp0qZK5YAHXikXewjHsZZXOkhYeynRrbqwFYdRlxmWQKf1iRN30Tjvs1sYLweqkPRnmk08fcRFX8j8m3UyFZnumWa6j-kJgGxprwleP86cPeWTKz_i_FcIiZUCZBBSDRqbAjDmNrPl62WAcIVaO0S2O6F54aYqtCxUOz836U-wOPx2eREnxyffn8LW2ydefMONrvF0r9H_NTZ3ZV-_Aa3ixK6 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prokinetics+in+acute+upper+GI+bleeding%3A+a+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal+endoscopy&rft.au=Barkun%2C+Alan+N.&rft.au=Bardou%2C+Marc&rft.au=Martel%2C+Myriam&rft.au=Gralnek%2C+Ian+M.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1138&rft.epage=1145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.gie.2010.08.011&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00165107%2FS0016510710X00128%2Fcov150h.gif |