Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis

Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents bef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 72; no. 6; pp. 1138 - 1145
Main Authors Barkun, Alan N., Bardou, Marc, Martel, Myriam, Gralnek, Ian M., Sung, Joseph J.Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Maryland heights, MO Mosby, Inc 01.12.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.
AbstractList Background Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. Objective To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Design and Setting Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). Results From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. Limitations The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Conclusions Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.
Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, −0.40; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, −1.04; 95% CI, −2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.
Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate. To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB. Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences. The results are limited by the small number of subjects. Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.
Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate.BACKGROUNDRecent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are limited in the number of subjects evaluated, and the conclusions are disparate.To assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB.OBJECTIVETo assess the evidence of administering prokinetic agents before EGD in acute UGIB.Comprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).DESIGN AND SETTINGComprehensive literature searches from 1990 to January 2010 were performed. We selected for meta-analysis randomized trials assessing prokinetic agents in acute UGIB. The primary outcome was the need for a repeat EGD. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic visualization, blood transfusions, duration of hospitalization, and surgery. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).From 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences.RESULTSFrom 487 citations identified, we selected 3 fully published articles and 2 abstracts assessing a total of 316 patients. Erythromycin (3 studies) and metoclopramide (2 studies) were compared with either placebo (2 studies) or no treatment (3 studies). A prokinetic agent significantly reduced the need for repeat EGD (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). The number of units of blood was not significantly altered (WMD, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.06) nor was hospital stay (WMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.83 to 0.76) or the need for surgery (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.27-4.67). Endoscopic visualization was not analyzed because the disparate definitions across studies did not allow for meaningful clinical inferences.The results are limited by the small number of subjects.LIMITATIONSThe results are limited by the small number of subjects.Intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.CONCLUSIONSIntravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide immediately before EGD in acute UGIB patients decreases the need for a repeat EGD, but does not improve other clinically relevant measurable outcomes.
Author Sung, Joseph J.Y.
Barkun, Alan N.
Gralnek, Ian M.
Bardou, Marc
Martel, Myriam
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Alan N.
  surname: Barkun
  fullname: Barkun, Alan N.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Marc
  surname: Bardou
  fullname: Bardou, Marc
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Myriam
  surname: Martel
  fullname: Martel, Myriam
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ian M.
  surname: Gralnek
  fullname: Gralnek, Ian M.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Joseph J.Y.
  surname: Sung
  fullname: Sung, Joseph J.Y.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23687279$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20970794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkt9rFDEQx4NU7LX6B_gi-yI-7XWS_ZGNQkGK1kKhBRV8C9nJbMl1L3smWeH-e3PcqVBofcoEPt8J88mcsCM_eWLsNYclB96erZZ3jpYC8h26JXD-jC04KFm2UqojtoAMlQ0HecxOYlwBQCcq_oIdiwyBVPWCydsw3TtPyWEsnC8MzomKebOhUFxeFf1IZJ2_e1-YYk3JlMabcRtdfMmeD2aM9OpwnrLvnz99u_hSXt9cXl18vC6x7mQqm7ayygiFVgmrumGoOGBvZY8gsa5Nb0XbVvVgseJG9tVQY9cIbmuRi55jdcre7ftuwvRzppj02kWkcTSepjnqjjdNLQHaTL45kHO_Jqs3wa1N2Oo_s2bg7QEwEc04BOPRxX9c1XZSSJU5vucwTDEGGv4iHPTOu17p7F3vvGvodPaeM_JBBl0yyU0-BePGJ5Mf9knKFn85CjqiI49ZeyBM2k7uyfT5gzSOzrs83j1tKa6mOeQPi5rrKDTor7uN2C0Ez4Vq5Y_cQD3e4D-P_wYFTcJa
CODEN GAENBQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastrohep_2015_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2020_02_028
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000001245
crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2015_48_2_121
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_12_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1542_neo_24_6_e403
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_03_005
crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2019_046
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_022_07698_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_014_0173_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpmfor_2021_10_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_32404_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_019_0283_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2015_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_015_0077_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpha_2021_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013176_pub2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2014_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_018_0192_0
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_05_095
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000002927
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2014_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1586_egh_12_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2014_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2011_480
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001907
crossref_primary_10_3390_gastroent15010001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_disamonth_2018_02_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_life14040526
crossref_primary_10_1155_2012_361425
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2014_384
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11654_015_0362_7
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0034_1366210
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640614557319
crossref_primary_10_17941_agd_440452
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2014_235
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2013_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vgie_2019_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_57913_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_07_057
crossref_primary_10_17235_reed_2016_4240_2016
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1369_5274
crossref_primary_10_18699_SSMJ20210601
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9020402
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cld_2018_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_goad011
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2036_2011_04708_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_02_008
crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2015_48_2_106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2011_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2011_260
crossref_primary_10_1186_2110_5820_2_46
crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_14222
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000000343
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2022_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1186_1749_7922_9_45
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_01_013
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002620
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13546_012_0489_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000000321
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojgas_2014_44028
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_13_60596_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2015_01_015
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2018_02_023
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCC_0000000000000185
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10049_022_01091_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_01_059
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_02_033
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastre_2016_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2223_1028
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1939_4887
Cites_doi 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
10.2307/2533446
10.1007/BF01708583
10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.041
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00582.x
10.1136/adc.2004.062083
10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009
10.1155/2005/198387
10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02543-4
10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.652
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30272.x
10.14309/00000434-200709002-01114
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4
10.1053/gast.2002.34230
10.1002/sim.1186
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<841::AID-SIM781>3.0.CO;2-D
10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70174-0
10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80270-7
10.1056/NEJMra0706113
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03516.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
– notice: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6779
EndPage 1145
ExternalDocumentID 20970794
23687279
10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
S001651071001967X
1_s2_0_S001651071001967X
Genre Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Olympus
– fundername: AstraZeneca
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FD8
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDZ
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
LZ1
M28
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OC.
ON0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
WOW
X7M
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-563d9a29cd92d98ff310cbd7bc07c44abd26634fdc31a7b3f4c8521d424c8b1c3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0016-5107
1097-6779
IngestDate Tue Aug 05 10:14:45 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:32:25 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:45:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:35 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:02 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:04 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords OR
UGIB
CI
WMD
upper GI bleeding
weighted mean difference
confidence interval
odds ratio
Digestive diseases
Intestinal disease
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Acute
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c487t-563d9a29cd92d98ff310cbd7bc07c44abd26634fdc31a7b3f4c8521d424c8b1c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 20970794
PQID 815547006
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_815547006
pubmed_primary_20970794
pascalfrancis_primary_23687279
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S001651071001967X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Maryland heights, MO
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Maryland heights, MO
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Gastrointestinal endoscopy
PublicationTitleAlternate Gastrointest Endosc
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Mosby, Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Mosby, Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Haefeli, Schoenenberger, Weiss (bib22) 1992; 18
Pogue, Yusuf (bib23) 1998; 351
Gralnek, Barkun, Bardou (bib3) 2008; 359
Barkun, Bardou, Kuipers (bib5) 2010; 152
Barkun, Sabbah, Enns (bib2) 2004; 99
Moher, Cook, Eastwood (bib16) 1999; 354
Dickersin, Scherer, Lefebvre (bib9) 1994; 309
Aljebreen, Fallone, Barkun (bib1) 2004; 59
Frossard, Spahr, Queneau (bib8) 2002; 123
Gupta, Sonpal, Patel (bib19) 2008; 67
Sussman, Deshpande, Parra (bib17) 2008; 67
Coffin, Pocard, Panis (bib7) 2002; 56
Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider (bib15) 1997; 315
Hardy, Thompson (bib12) 1998; 17
Williams, Higgins, Brayne (bib13) 2006; 91
Winstead, Wilcox (bib24) 2007; 26
Jadad, Moore, Carroll (bib10) 1996; 17
Carbonell, Pauwels, Serfaty (bib6) 2006; 101
Itoh, Nakaya, Suzuki (bib21) 1984; 247
Bensoussan, Fallone, Barkun (bib4) 2005; 19
Higgins, Thompson (bib11) 2002; 21
Begg, Mazumdar (bib14) 1994; 50
Sears, Duckworth, Balaban (bib18) 1996; 43
Habashi, Lambiase, Kottoor (bib20) 2007; 102
Bensoussan (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib4) 2005; 19
Moher (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib16) 1999; 354
Habashi (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib20) 2007; 102
Barkun (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib5) 2010; 152
Williams (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib13) 2006; 91
Sears (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib18) 1996; 43
Barkun (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib2) 2004; 99
Winstead (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib24) 2007; 26
Higgins (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib11) 2002; 21
Dickersin (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib9) 1994; 309
Carbonell (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib6) 2006; 101
Itoh (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib21) 1984; 247
Haefeli (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib22) 1992; 18
Gralnek (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib3) 2008; 359
Sussman (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib17) 2008; 67
Hardy (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib12) 1998; 17
Aljebreen (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib1) 2004; 59
Gupta (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib19) 2008; 67
Jadad (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib10) 1996; 17
Frossard (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib8) 2002; 123
Begg (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib14) 1994; 50
Pogue (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib23) 1998; 351
Coffin (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib7) 2002; 56
Egger (10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib15) 1997; 315
21704823 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):234; author reply 234-5
References_xml – volume: 354
  start-page: 1896
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1900
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 359
  start-page: 928
  year: 2008
  end-page: 937
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 123
  start-page: 17
  year: 2002
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 67
  start-page: AB247
  year: 2008
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Intravenous metoclopramide to increase mucosal visualization during endoscopy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled study [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 59
  start-page: 172
  year: 2004
  end-page: 178
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 67
  start-page: AB81
  year: 2008
  end-page: AB82
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Prokinetic agent- metoclopromide increases the yield of upper endoscopy and decreases the need for second look endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed a randomized prospective study [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 309
  start-page: 1286
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1291
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 91
  start-page: 8
  year: 2006
  end-page: 15
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders
  publication-title: Arch Dis Child
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1088
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1101
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1238
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1246
  ident: bib2
  article-title: The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 247
  start-page: G688
  year: 1984
  end-page: G694
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– volume: 56
  start-page: 174
  year: 2002
  end-page: 179
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 102
  start-page: S526
  year: 2007
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Prokinetics infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind & placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 469
  year: 1992
  end-page: 473
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Possible risk for cardiac arrhythmia related to intravenous erythromycin
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 1996
  end-page: 12
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
  publication-title: Control Clin Trials
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1371
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1377
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 19
  start-page: 487
  year: 2005
  end-page: 495
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A sampling of Canadian practice in managing nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding before recent guideline publication: is there room for improvement?
  publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol
– volume: 152
  start-page: 101
  year: 2010
  end-page: 113
  ident: bib5
  article-title: International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 17
  start-page: 841
  year: 1998
  end-page: 856
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 43
  start-page: 358
  year: 1996
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Erythromycin versus gastric lavage for preendoscopic preparation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1211
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1215
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1539
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1558
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 351
  start-page: 47
  year: 1998
  end-page: 52
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib10
  article-title: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
  publication-title: Control Clin Trials
  doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
– volume: 354
  start-page: 1896
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib16
  article-title: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1088
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib14
  article-title: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2533446
– volume: 18
  start-page: 469
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib22
  article-title: Possible risk for cardiac arrhythmia related to intravenous erythromycin
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
  doi: 10.1007/BF01708583
– volume: 67
  start-page: AB81
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib19
  article-title: Prokinetic agent- metoclopromide increases the yield of upper endoscopy and decreases the need for second look endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed a randomized prospective study [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.041
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1211
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib6
  article-title: Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00582.x
– volume: 91
  start-page: 8
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib13
  article-title: Systematic review of prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders
  publication-title: Arch Dis Child
  doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.062083
– volume: 152
  start-page: 101
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib5
  article-title: International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009
– volume: 19
  start-page: 487
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib4
  article-title: A sampling of Canadian practice in managing nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding before recent guideline publication: is there room for improvement?
  publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1155/2005/198387
– volume: 59
  start-page: 172
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib1
  article-title: Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02543-4
– volume: 67
  start-page: AB247
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib17
  article-title: Intravenous metoclopramide to increase mucosal visualization during endoscopy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled study [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.652
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1238
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib2
  article-title: The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibition are associated with improved outcomes in a real-life setting
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30272.x
– volume: 102
  start-page: S526
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib20
  article-title: Prokinetics infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind & placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.14309/00000434-200709002-01114
– volume: 351
  start-page: 47
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib23
  article-title: Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4
– volume: 123
  start-page: 17
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib8
  article-title: Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34230
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1539
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib11
  article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
– volume: 17
  start-page: 841
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib12
  article-title: Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<841::AID-SIM781>3.0.CO;2-D
– volume: 56
  start-page: 174
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib7
  article-title: Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70174-0
– volume: 309
  start-page: 1286
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib9
  article-title: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib15
  article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– volume: 247
  start-page: G688
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib21
  article-title: Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog
  publication-title: Am J Physiol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 358
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib18
  article-title: Erythromycin versus gastric lavage for preendoscopic preparation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding [abstract]
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80270-7
– volume: 359
  start-page: 928
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib3
  article-title: Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706113
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1371
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011_bib24
  article-title: Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03516.x
– reference: 21704823 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):234; author reply 234-5
SSID ssj0008231
Score 2.3376896
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published studies are...
Background Recent data suggest that administration of prokinetics before gastroscopy may be useful in patients with acute upper GI bleeding (UGIB). Published...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1138
SubjectTerms Acute Disease
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Transfusion
Digestive system. Abdomen
Duodenal Diseases - diagnosis
Duodenal Diseases - therapy
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Digestive System
Erythromycin - administration & dosage
Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis
Esophageal Diseases - therapy
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastrointestinal Agents - administration & dosage
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Metoclopramide - administration & dosage
Other diseases. Semiology
Premedication
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stomach Diseases - diagnosis
Stomach Diseases - therapy
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Title Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S001651071001967X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S001651071001967X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20970794
https://www.proquest.com/docview/815547006
Volume 72
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB7ygFIoJX27TRYdeio4sSWtLfUWQpNNS0IPDexN6OWybeo1a-81vz2jtewS2qTQmzAeLA-jbz4xL4D3Fc0qLsw0Fd6ylCPlTwXLdBhmxgukwDozoVD44rKYXfHP8-l8C06GWpiQVhmxv8f0DVrHJ0dRm0fNYhFqfPMCLSq0p0EzKufbsEuZLNC0d4_Pv8wuR0AOka4ekIs0CAzBzU2a1_eFjwle4jDL8_vc05NGt6i0qp92cT8d3bil0z14GvkkOe63_Ay2fP0cHl3EiPkLKL-ulj9xFboxk0VNtF13nqybxq_I2Tkx1733-kg0-eU7nerYpOQlXJ1--nYyS-OwhNTinaNLpwVzUlNpnaROiqpC3maNK43NSsu5Ng5dMeOVsyzXpWEVtwJdt-MUFya37BXs1MvavwGCNw5NK-HLQofQb6aNnQrmpbPSiULSBLJBR8rGTuJhoMW1GlLGfihUqwpqVWHIZZ4n8GEUafo2Gg-9TAfFq6E-FBFNIcg_JFT-Tci38Uy2KlctVZn6w24S4KPkHdP71wcnd2xi_C_KCoGsUCZABiNReGZDIEbXfrlulQgkrkS8S-B1bzy_hTMZehbyt_-3qXfwmI75Nvuw063W_gBZU2cmsH14k0_i2bgFf0YR9g
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIkElhHiWFCg-cEJK69jexO4NVZQtdCsOrbQ3y3acammbjTbZK7-d8cbZqoIWiZsVeWRnNI_PmhfAx4rRSkg7SqV3PBUI-VPJqQnDzESOENhQGwqFJ6f5-Fx8m46mG3A41MKEtMpo-3ubvrLW8ct-5OZ-M5uFGt8sR4kK7WlQjIrpA3goUH2Ddu79usnzCHGu3hznadg-hDZXSV4XMx_Tu-QezbK7nNOTxrTIsqqfdXE3GF05paNn8DSiSfK5v_Bz2PD1C3g0ifHyl1D8WMwvcRV6MZNZTYxbdp4sm8YvyNdjYq9633VADLn2nUlNbFHyCs6PvpwdjtM4KiF1-OLo0lHOS2WYcqVipZJVhajN2bKwjhZOCGNLdMRcVKXjmSksr4ST6LhLwXBhM8dfw2Y9r_0bIPjeMKySvshNCPxSY91Icq9Kp0qZK5YAHXikXewjHsZZXOkhYeynRrbqwFYdRlxmWQKf1iRN30Tjvs1sYLweqkPRnmk08fcRFX8j8m3UyFZnumWa6j-kJgGxprwleP86cPeWTKz_i_FcIiZUCZBBSDRqbAjDmNrPl62WAcIVaO0S2O6F54aYqtCxUOz836U-wOPx2eREnxyffn8LW2ydefMONrvF0r9H_NTZ3ZV-_Aa3ixK6
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prokinetics+in+acute+upper+GI+bleeding%3A+a+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal+endoscopy&rft.au=Barkun%2C+Alan+N.&rft.au=Bardou%2C+Marc&rft.au=Martel%2C+Myriam&rft.au=Gralnek%2C+Ian+M.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1138&rft.epage=1145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.gie.2010.08.011&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_gie_2010_08_011
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00165107%2FS0016510710X00128%2Fcov150h.gif