Study methodology impacts density-dependent dispersal observations: a systematic review

• Published in: Movement ecology Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 39
• Main Authors: Jreidini, Nathalie, Green, David M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 21.05.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Birds; Comment; Conspecific density; Data methodology; Empirical observations; Fishes; Heterogeneity; Meta-analysis; Migration; Heterogeneity; Data methodology; Empirical observations; Migration; Conspecific density; Meta-analysis
• DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00478-6
• ISSN: 2051-3933

The relationship between animal dispersal and conspecific density has been explored in various study systems but results in terms of both the magnitude and the direction of density dependence are inconsistent. We conducted a thorough review of the literature (2000-2023) and found k = 97 empirical studies of birds, fishes, herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles), invertebrates, or mammals that had tested for a correlation between conspecific density and animal dispersal. We extracted categorical variables for taxonomic group, sex, age, migratory behavior, study design, dispersal metric, density metric and variable type, as well as temporal and spatial scale, to test each of their correlation with the effect of density on dispersal (Pearson's r) using linear regressions and multilevel mixed-effect modelling. We found certain biases in the published literature, highlighting that the impact of conspecific density on dispersal is not as widespread as it is thought to be. We also found no predominant trend for density-dependent dispersal across taxonomic groups. Instead, results show that the scale and metrics of empirical observations significantly affected analytical results, and heterogeneity measures were high within taxonomic groups. Therefore, the direction and magnitude of the interaction between density and dispersal in empirical studies could partially be attributed to the data collection method involved. We suggest that the contradictory observations for density-dependent dispersal could be explained by dispersal-dependent density, where density is driven by movement instead, and urge researchers to either test this interaction when applicable or consider this perspective when reporting results.