Edge detection and mathematic fitting for corneal surface with Matlab software
AIM：To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS：Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography（OCT）were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection m...
Saved in:
| Published in | International journal of ophthalmology Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 336 - 342 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
China
International Journal of Ophthalmology Press
18.03.2017
Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | AIM：To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS：Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography（OCT）were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods（Canny,Log,Prewitt,Roberts,Sobel）were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods（ginput and getpts）were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve（y=Ax2＋Bx＋C）,Polynomial curve [p（x）=p1xn＋p2x（n-1）＋...＋pnx＋pn＋1] and Conic section（Ax2＋Bxy＋Cy2＋Dx＋Ey＋F=0）were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally,the eccentricity（e）obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS：Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis,eccentricity,circle center,etc. There were no significant differences between ＇e＇ values by corneal topography and conic section（t=0.9143,P=0.3760 〉0.05）.CONCLUSION：It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | AIM：To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS：Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography（OCT）were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods（Canny,Log,Prewitt,Roberts,Sobel）were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods（ginput and getpts）were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve（y=Ax2＋Bx＋C）,Polynomial curve [p（x）=p1xn＋p2x（n-1）＋...＋pnx＋pn＋1] and Conic section（Ax2＋Bxy＋Cy2＋Dx＋Ey＋F=0）were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally,the eccentricity（e）obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS：Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis,eccentricity,circle center,etc. There were no significant differences between ＇e＇ values by corneal topography and conic section（t=0.9143,P=0.3760 〉0.05）.CONCLUSION：It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography (OCT) were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods (Canny, Log, Prewitt, Roberts, Sobel) were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods (ginput and getpts) were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve (y=Ax +Bx+C), Polynomial curve [p(x)=p1x +p2x +...+pnx+pn+1] and Conic section (Ax +Bxy+Cy +Dx+Ey+F=0) were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally, the eccentricity (e) obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired -test. Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis, eccentricity, circle center, . There were no significant differences between 'e' values by corneal topography and conic section ( =0.9143, =0.3760 >0.05). It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. AIM: To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS: Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography (OCT) were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods (Canny, Log, Prewitt, Roberts, Sobel) were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods (ginput and getpts) were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve (y=Ax2+Bx+C), Polynomial curve [p(x)=p1xn+p2xn-1 +...+pnx+pn+1] and Conic section (Ax2+Bxy+Cy2+Dx+Ey+F=0) were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally, the eccentricity (e) obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS: Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis, eccentricity, circle center, etc. There were no significant differences between ‘e’ values by corneal topography and conic section (t=0.9143, P=0.3760 >0.05). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software.AIMTo select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software.Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography (OCT) were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods (Canny, Log, Prewitt, Roberts, Sobel) were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods (ginput and getpts) were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve (y=Ax2+Bx+C), Polynomial curve [p(x)=p1xn+p2xn-1 +...+pnx+pn+1] and Conic section (Ax2+Bxy+Cy2+Dx+Ey+F=0) were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally, the eccentricity (e) obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test.METHODSFifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography (OCT) were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods (Canny, Log, Prewitt, Roberts, Sobel) were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods (ginput and getpts) were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve (y=Ax2+Bx+C), Polynomial curve [p(x)=p1xn+p2xn-1 +...+pnx+pn+1] and Conic section (Ax2+Bxy+Cy2+Dx+Ey+F=0) were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally, the eccentricity (e) obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test.Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis, eccentricity, circle center, etc. There were no significant differences between 'e' values by corneal topography and conic section (t=0.9143, P=0.3760 >0.05).RESULTSFive edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis, eccentricity, circle center, etc. There were no significant differences between 'e' values by corneal topography and conic section (t=0.9143, P=0.3760 >0.05).It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties.CONCLUSIONIt is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. |
| Author | Yue Di Mei-Yan Li Tong Qiao Na Lu |
| AuthorAffiliation | Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Children＇s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200062, China Department of Ophthalmology, Eye ＆ ENT Hospital Fudan Unversity, Fenyang Road 83, Shanghai 200031, China Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital North, Fudan University, 108 Luxiang Road, Shanghai 201907, China |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan Unversity, Fenyang Road 83, Shanghai 200031, China – name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200062, China – name: 3 Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital North, Fudan University, 108 Luxiang Road, Shanghai 201907, China |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yue surname: Di fullname: Di, Yue organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200062, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Mei-Yan surname: Li fullname: Li, Mei-Yan organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital Fudan Unversity, Fenyang Road 83, Shanghai 200031, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Tong surname: Qiao fullname: Qiao, Tong organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200062, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Na surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Na organization: Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital North, Fudan University, 108 Luxiang Road, Shanghai 201907, China |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28393021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kc1vEzEQxVeoiJbSMze04sQlqT_W9vqChKoClQpcerfG3vHG0cZuvQ4V_z1uEiLKAR_skf3eb8Z6r5uTmCI2zVtKlrRnHbkM67RkhKol4UvCXjRnjDG16Hrdn-xqtuBa6NPmYp7XpC4pCCXdq-aU9VxzwuhZ8_16GLEdsKArIcUW4tBuoKywbsG1PpQS4tj6lFuXckSY2nmbPThsH0NZtd-gTGDbOfnyCBnfNC89TDNeHM7z5u7z9d3V18Xtjy83V59uF67rZVkgWi88F9SBE0oxgQqcElrq-gHqfMfBSWa1BAFiYNJxq8Gi1VZQ6zp-3tzssUOCtbnPYQP5l0kQzO4i5dFArvNPaKgSwL1mSInoCFBb4d3Aue4tGYTDyvq4Z91v7QYHh7FkmJ5Bn7_EsDJj-mkEl0RJUQEfDoCcHrY4F7MJs8NpgohpOxva95ILrTWp0nd_9zo2-ZNHFVzuBS6nec7ojxJKzC50U0M3T6Ebwg1h1SH-cbhQ4CnLOmyY_uN7f_CtUhwfasjHVlJVne4U478Bt2S9LQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjac341 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3416465 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | International Journal of Ophthalmology Press 2017 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: International Journal of Ophthalmology Press 2017 |
| DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.18240/ijo.2017.03.02 |
| DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Edge detection and mathematic fitting for corneal surface with Matlab software |
| EISSN | 2227-4898 |
| EndPage | 342 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_175a3f92e10540a1bf434d3398b0d5ce PMC5360765 28393021 10_18240_ijo_2017_03_02 672019472 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | -SE -S~ 2RA 53G 5VR 5VS 92L ABKZE AENEX AFUIB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CAJEE CAJUS CCEZO CHBEP CIEJG CQIGP DIK FA0 GROUPED_DOAJ HYE IPNFZ Q-- Q-4 RIG RNS RPM U1G U5O W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-eebf5f351cac57725e7ac759692271cf43ac62b96a5a5d26c3b9abeb9b51bc43 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2222-3959 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:33 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:05:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 13:42:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:00:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:14:57 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:03:18 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | curve fitting corneal topography edge detection Matlab software optical coherence tomography mathematic simulation |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c486t-eebf5f351cac57725e7ac759692271cf43ac62b96a5a5d26c3b9abeb9b51bc43 |
| Notes | Matlab software edge detection curve fitting mathematic simulation optical coherence tomography corneal topography AIM：To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS：Fifteen subjects were recruited. The corneal images from optical coherence tomography（OCT）were imported into Matlab software. Five edge detection methods（Canny,Log,Prewitt,Roberts,Sobel）were used to identify the corneal surface. Then two manual identifying methods（ginput and getpts）were applied to identify the edge coordinates respectively. The differences among these methods were compared. Binomial curve（y=Ax2＋Bx＋C）,Polynomial curve [p（x）=p1xn＋p2x（n-1）＋....＋pnx＋pn＋1] and Conic section（Ax2＋Bxy＋Cy2＋Dx＋Ey＋F=0）were used for curve fitting the corneal surface respectively. The relative merits among three fitting curves were analyzed. Finally,the eccentricity（e）obtained by corneal topography and conic section were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS：Five edge detection algorithms all had continuous coordinates which indicated the edge of the corneal surface. The ordinates of manual identifying were close to the inside of the actual edges. Binomial curve was greatly affected by tilt angle. Polynomial curve was lack of geometrical properties and unstable. Conic section could calculate the tilted symmetry axis,eccentricity,circle center,etc. There were no significant differences between ＇e＇ values by corneal topography and conic section（t=0.9143,P=0.3760 〉0.05）.CONCLUSION：It is feasible to simulate the corneal surface with mathematical curve with Matlab software. Edge detection has better repeatability and higher efficiency. The manual identifying approach is an indispensable complement for detection. Polynomial and conic section are both the alternative methods for corneal curve fitting. Conic curve was the optimal choice based on the specific geometrical properties. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Co-first authors: Yue Di and Mei-Yan Li |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/175a3f92e10540a1bf434d3398b0d5ce |
| PMID | 28393021 |
| PQID | 1886359990 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_175a3f92e10540a1bf434d3398b0d5ce pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5360765 proquest_miscellaneous_1886359990 pubmed_primary_28393021 crossref_primary_10_18240_ijo_2017_03_02 crossref_citationtrail_10_18240_ijo_2017_03_02 chongqing_primary_672019472 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2017-03-18 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-03-18 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2017 text: 2017-03-18 day: 18 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | China |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: China |
| PublicationTitle | International journal of ophthalmology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | International Journal of Ophthalmology |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| Publisher | International Journal of Ophthalmology Press Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: International Journal of Ophthalmology Press – name: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) |
| References | 21385521 - Microsc Microanal. 2011 Apr;17(2):156-66 25042843 - Biom J. 2014 Nov;56(6):963-72 20720881 - Appl Opt. 1992 May 1;31(13):2223-8 25004499 - IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Jul;60(7):1295-311 18561972 - Vision Res. 2008 Jul;48(16):1681-94 23837229 - Coll Antropol. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:117-20 25097634 - J Res Med Sci. 2014 May;19(5):477 15641716 - IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004 Oct;26(10):1283-94 15861424 - Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Nov;128(3):630-8 16342913 - Radiat Med. 2005 Aug;23(5):386-9 24877011 - Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Apr 14;5(5):1494-511 24665462 - Analyst. 2014 May 21;139(10):2355-69 21833074 - Nature. 2011 Aug 10;476(7359):152 25616741 - Bull Math Biol. 2015 Mar;77(3):548-78 25676065 - Vet Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;19(1):50-6 25460658 - Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:373-80 25599542 - J Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;31(1):42-7 24099693 - Med Eng Phys. 2014 Mar;36(3):412-7 1200126 - Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975 Aug;52(8):561-6 11778716 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Jan;19(1):137-43 25448021 - J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Feb;109 :31-8 19017231 - J Microsc. 2008 Nov;232(2):313-34 17910790 - Appl Spectrosc. 2007 Sep;61(9):940-9 9682864 - Vis Neurosci. 1998 Jul-Aug;15(4):597-605 20415288 - J Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;26(9):625-37 5972153 - J Physiol. 1966 Oct;186(3):558-78 |
| References_xml | – reference: 23837229 - Coll Antropol. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:117-20 – reference: 24665462 - Analyst. 2014 May 21;139(10):2355-69 – reference: 25460658 - Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:373-80 – reference: 17910790 - Appl Spectrosc. 2007 Sep;61(9):940-9 – reference: 24877011 - Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Apr 14;5(5):1494-511 – reference: 21385521 - Microsc Microanal. 2011 Apr;17(2):156-66 – reference: 25004499 - IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Jul;60(7):1295-311 – reference: 15641716 - IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004 Oct;26(10):1283-94 – reference: 20720881 - Appl Opt. 1992 May 1;31(13):2223-8 – reference: 24099693 - Med Eng Phys. 2014 Mar;36(3):412-7 – reference: 5972153 - J Physiol. 1966 Oct;186(3):558-78 – reference: 25616741 - Bull Math Biol. 2015 Mar;77(3):548-78 – reference: 18561972 - Vision Res. 2008 Jul;48(16):1681-94 – reference: 20415288 - J Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;26(9):625-37 – reference: 25448021 - J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Feb;109 :31-8 – reference: 25097634 - J Res Med Sci. 2014 May;19(5):477 – reference: 15861424 - Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Nov;128(3):630-8 – reference: 9682864 - Vis Neurosci. 1998 Jul-Aug;15(4):597-605 – reference: 11778716 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Jan;19(1):137-43 – reference: 19017231 - J Microsc. 2008 Nov;232(2):313-34 – reference: 25042843 - Biom J. 2014 Nov;56(6):963-72 – reference: 25599542 - J Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;31(1):42-7 – reference: 25676065 - Vet Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;19(1):50-6 – reference: 16342913 - Radiat Med. 2005 Aug;23(5):386-9 – reference: 1200126 - Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975 Aug;52(8):561-6 – reference: 21833074 - Nature. 2011 Aug 10;476(7359):152 |
| SSID | ssj0000650104 |
| Score | 2.129469 |
| Snippet | AIM：To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface,and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software.... To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. Fifteen subjects... To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software.AIMTo select the... AIM: To select the optimal edge detection methods to identify the corneal surface, and compare three fitting curve equations with Matlab software. METHODS:... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref chongqing |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 336 |
| SubjectTerms | Basic Research corneal topography curve fitting edge detection mathematic simulation Matlab software optical coherence tomography |
| Title | Edge detection and mathematic fitting for corneal surface with Matlab software |
| URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/60944X/201703/672019472.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28393021 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1886359990 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5360765 https://doaj.org/article/175a3f92e10540a1bf434d3398b0d5ce |
| Volume | 10 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gL4k1oQUbiwCU0fsdHQK0qpPZUpN6s8atdBNmymxV_v-MkG-0iEBeujl-ZGXu-iSefCXnXtjnr7HPtuRS1DAlqAC5qn7lQYFiOeUiQvdBnX-WXK3W1c9VXyQkb6YFHwR2jewORLU-sgAtgPkshoxC29U1UIZXdF33eTjA17sGqBBrlZjle0tWtshOvT4su7Hjxrfz3x8zAb8oLrcLNsrv-ic5izz0NLP5_gp6_Z1DuuKTTR-ThhCXpx_EdHpN7qXtC7p9Pp-VPycVJvE40pn5It-oodJH-mGlaaV4MOc8UYSvFGLRDyEjXm1WGkGj5PEvPoUcboWvcqX_BKj0jl6cnl5_P6un-hDrIVvd1Sj6rLBQLEBSiaJUMBKOstpwbFlCQEDT3VoMCFbkOwlvwyVuvmA9SPCcH3bJLLwltAmBLE7LQEbtuLUgfNZdYzGTwsiKHswTd7UiT4bRBEVtpeEU-bGXqwsQ8Xi7A-O5KBFIU4lAhrijENcI12OD93GDb21-rfipKmqsVtuyhAG3ITTbk_mVDFXm7VbHD1VWOTKBLy80ah2wRkSGIbiryYlT5PBQCMysQIlXE7BnD3lz2n3SLm4HBWwndGK1e_Y_JH5IHRRwlL461R-SgX23SawRKvX8zrIk7dKIQQA |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Edge+detection+and+mathematic+fitting+for+corneal+surface+with+Matlab+software&rft.jtitle=%E5%9B%BD%E9%99%85%E7%9C%BC%E7%A7%91%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=Yue+Di+Mei-Yan+Li+Tong+Qiao+Na+Lu&rft.date=2017-03-18&rft.issn=2222-3959&rft.eissn=2227-4898&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=342&rft_id=info:doi/10.18240%2Fijo.2017.03.02&rft.externalDocID=672019472 |
| thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F60944X%2F60944X.jpg |