Topographic uncertainty quantification for flow-like landslide models via stochastic simulations

• Published in: Natural hazards and earth system sciences Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 1441 - 1461
• Main Authors: Zhao, Hu, Kowalski, Julia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 26.05.2020; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Accuracy; Analysis; Computer applications; Computer simulation; Data processing; Digital Elevation Models; Earthquakes; Errors; Extreme values; Feasibility studies; Flow (Dynamics); Landslides; Landslides & mudslides; Mathematical models; Methods; Prejudice; Propagation; Random variables; Rheology; Simulation; Topography; Uncertainty; Variability; Workflow; Workflow software
• ISSN: 1684-9981; 1561-8633; 1684-9981
• DOI: 10.5194/nhess-20-1441-2020

Digital elevation models (DEMs) representing topography are an essential input for computational models capable of simulating the run-out of flow-like landslides. Yet, DEMs are often subject to error, a fact that is mostly overlooked in landslide modeling. We address this research gap and investigate the impact of topographic uncertainty on landslide run-out models. In particular, we will describe two different approaches to account for DEM uncertainty, namely unconditional and conditional stochastic simulation methods. We investigate and discuss their feasibility, as well as whether DEM uncertainty represented by stochastic simulations critically affects landslide run-out simulations. Based upon a historic flow-like landslide event in Hong Kong, we present a series of computational scenarios to compare both methods using our modular Python-based workflow. Our results show that DEM uncertainty can significantly affect simulation-based landslide run-out analyses, depending on how well the underlying flow path is captured by the DEM, as well as on further topographic characteristics and the DEM error's variability. We further find that, in the absence of systematic bias in the DEM, a performant root-mean-square-error-based unconditional stochastic simulation yields similar results to a computationally intensive conditional stochastic simulation that takes actual DEM error values at reference locations into account. In all other cases the unconditional stochastic simulation overestimates the variability in the DEM error, which leads to an increase in the potential hazard area as well as extreme values of dynamic flow properties.