Soft tissue response to titanium dioxide nanotube modified implants

Titanium is widely used clinically, yet little is known regarding the effects of modifying its three-dimensional surface geometry at the nanoscale level. In this project we have explored the in vivo response in terms of nitric oxide scavenging and fibrotic capsule formation to nano-modified titanium...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa biomaterialia Vol. 7; no. 8; pp. 3209 - 3215
Main Authors Smith, Garrett C., Chamberlain, Lisa, Faxius, Linda, Johnston, Gary W., Jin, Sungho, Bjursten, Lars M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Titanium is widely used clinically, yet little is known regarding the effects of modifying its three-dimensional surface geometry at the nanoscale level. In this project we have explored the in vivo response in terms of nitric oxide scavenging and fibrotic capsule formation to nano-modified titanium implant surfaces. We compared titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes with 100nm diameters fabricated by electrochemical anodization with TiO2 control surfaces. Significantly lower nitric oxide was observed for the nanostructured surface in solution, suggesting that nanotubes break down nitric oxide. To evaluate the soft tissue response in vivo TiO2 nanotube and TiO2 control implants were placed in the rat abdominal wall for 1 and 6weeks. A reduced fibrotic capsule thickness was observed for the nanotube surfaces for both time points. Significantly lower nitric oxide activity, measured as the presence of nitrotyrosine (P<0.05), was observed on the nanotube surface after 1week, indicating that the reactive nitrogen species interaction is of importance. The differences observed between the titanium surfaces may be due to the catalytic properties of TiO2, which are increased by the nanotube structure. These findings may be significant for the interaction between titanium implants in soft tissue as well as bone tissue and provide a mechanism by which to improve future clinical implants.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.003
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-7061
1878-7568
1878-7568
DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.003