Power and Sample Size Calculations for SNP Association Studies With Censored Time-to-Event Outcomes

For many clinical studies in cancer, germline DNA is prospectively collected for the purpose of discovering or validating single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with clinical outcomes. The primary clinical endpoint for many of these studies are time‐to‐event outcomes such as time of death...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenetic epidemiology Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 538 - 548
Main Authors Owzar, Kouros, Li, Zhiguo, Cox, Nancy, Jung, Sin-Ho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0741-0395
1098-2272
1098-2272
DOI10.1002/gepi.21645

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For many clinical studies in cancer, germline DNA is prospectively collected for the purpose of discovering or validating single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with clinical outcomes. The primary clinical endpoint for many of these studies are time‐to‐event outcomes such as time of death or disease progression which are subject to censoring mechanisms. The Cox score test can be readily employed to test the association between a SNP and the outcome of interest. In addition to the effect and sample size, and censoring distribution, the power of the test will depend on the underlying genetic risk model and the distribution of the risk allele. We propose a rigorous account for power and sample size calculations under a variety of genetic risk models without resorting to the commonly used contiguous alternative assumption. Practical advice along with an open‐source software package to design SNP association studies with survival outcomes are provided.
Bibliography:National Cancer Institute - No. P01CA142538; No. CA33601
istex:C52FA2BDDEE4ACF7D4B626DAA541EC4F6F811AED
PAAR-Pharmacogenomics of Anticancer Agents Research Group - No. U01GM061393
ArticleID:GEPI21645
ark:/67375/WNG-WMWQJZVP-B
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0741-0395
1098-2272
1098-2272
DOI:10.1002/gepi.21645