Differences in patient-physician communication between the emergency department and other departments in a hospital setting in Taiwan
Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. How...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC health services research Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
20.11.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. Keywords: Emergency department, Patient-physician communication, Continuing medical education |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. Keywords: Emergency department, Patient-physician communication, Continuing medical education Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. Abstract Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings—internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps—greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship—had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients’ active engagement in their health care. BackgroundCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.ObjectivesThis study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings—internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.MethodsBoth qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.ResultsPatient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps—greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship—had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.ConclusionsTo improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients’ active engagement in their health care. Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.BACKGROUNDCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings-internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings-internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.METHODSBoth qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps-greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship-had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.RESULTSPatient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps-greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship-had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care.CONCLUSIONSTo improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. |
ArticleNumber | 1279 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Lee, Ya-Hui Lee, Chen-Wei Shih, Yu-Ze Wang, Yi-Fen Lee, Yi-Kung |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yi-Fen surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Yi-Fen – sequence: 2 givenname: Ya-Hui surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Ya-Hui – sequence: 3 givenname: Chen-Wei surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Chen-Wei – sequence: 4 givenname: Yu-Ze surname: Shih fullname: Shih, Yu-Ze – sequence: 5 givenname: Yi-Kung surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Yi-Kung |
BookMark | eNp9UstqHDEQHIIDsZ38QE6CXHIZR6-VZo7GeRkMuThn0aNp7WqZkSaSFrMfkP-2djchjglBAonqqtKj66I5CzFg07xl9IqxTn3IjPdMtJSLllHBWMtfNOdMat6qXomzJ_tXzUXOW0qZ7rg-b35-9M5hwmAxEx_IAsVjKO2y2WdvPQRi4zzvgre1EAMZsDwgBlI2SHDGtK7KPRlxgVTmKiQQRhJrNT0Bj85ANjEvvsBEMpbiw_qA3oN_gPC6eelgyvjm13rZfP_86f7ma3v37cvtzfVda2W3Kq3qOjvIXlKwSo7KOa07pwFA4cDVUItgNVXIcHBWgRys6xClUrJX_eBAXDa3J98xwtYsyc-Q9iaCN0cgprWpV_Z2QqOAdWIUPZMSpcYBYOAOEFDWueKyer0_eS0p_thhLmb22eI0QcC4y4Z3Peeaai0q9d0z6jbuUqgvNbynnDHBV-oPaw31fB9cLAnswdRcVxcl9IofWFf_YNUx4uxtTYXzFf9L0J0ENsWcEzpjaxMOzaxCPxlGzSFC5hQhUyNkjhEyvEr5M-nvL_uP6BE_Q81I |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cegh_2024_101892 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12873_024_01001_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_024_01074_4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1364 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.682 10.1080/21642850.2017.1286498 10.1111/acem.12138 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387 10.5455/msm.2017.29.192-195 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2003.tb00182.x 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5 10.4172/2472-1654.100146 10.1207/S15327027HC1301_04 10.1186/s12909-019-1776-7 10.1186/s12245-015-0095-y 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000719 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x 10.1080/01488376.2021.2006856 10.1186/1472-6963-13-22 10.1093/ijpp/riab068 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765 10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0003 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x 10.12669/pjms.344.15136 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.016 10.20529/IJME.2015.043 10.1093/geront/gnp030 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2023. The Author(s). |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2023. The Author(s). |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7RV 7WY 7WZ 7X7 7XB 87Z 88C 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG FYUFA F~G GHDGH K60 K6~ K9. KB0 L.- M0C M0S M0T M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-023-10311-2 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Business Premium Collection (Alumni) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Global Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals [open access] url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health Medicine |
EISSN | 1472-6963 |
EndPage | 11 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524 A773637526 10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2 |
GeographicLocations | Taiwan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Taiwan |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 44B 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7WY 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FL AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BEZIV BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FRNLG FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC K60 K6~ KQ8 M0C M0T M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC K9. L.- PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-688cb4940ac64d6ff778f7aaa6eb26b8cbac706e1ebfc6a4bcf8ee4664969bfa3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1472-6963 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:28 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 03:44:54 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 04:50:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:23:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:15:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:29:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:56 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c485t-688cb4940ac64d6ff778f7aaa6eb26b8cbac706e1ebfc6a4bcf8ee4664969bfa3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113256?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PQID | 2902113256 |
PQPubID | 44821 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524 proquest_miscellaneous_2892270773 proquest_journals_2902113256 gale_infotracmisc_A773637526 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A773637526 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-11-20 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-11-20 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2023 text: 2023-11-20 day: 20 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC health services research |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | ML McHugh (10311_CR30) 2003; 8 SD Goold (10311_CR16) 2002; 17 E Krupat (10311_CR19) 2001; 50 TW October (10311_CR10) 2016; 17 SD Pearson (10311_CR17) 2000; 15 LB Mauksch (10311_CR2) 2008; 168 SB Merriam (10311_CR28) 2002 10311_CR15 L Vail (10311_CR9) 2011; 83 NM Bakic-Miric (10311_CR18) 2008; 15 J Birkhauer (10311_CR21) 2017; 12 S Alsubaie (10311_CR11) 2022; 30 TC Tsai (10311_CR22) 2015; 261 DM McCarthy (10311_CR23) 2013; 20 S Chandra (10311_CR3) 2018; 3 D Roter (10311_CR33) 2001; 13 J Pun (10311_CR6) 2015; 8 A Cavaco (10311_CR32) 2010; 18 YS Lincoln (10311_CR29) 2005 D Roter (10311_CR34) 2002; 46 CS Chang (10311_CR13) 2013; 13 O Unal (10311_CR36) 2018; 34 JY Lu (10311_CR35) 2021; 48 LR Gay (10311_CR31) 1992 R Nelson (10311_CR1) 2008; 168 M Packer (10311_CR25) 2011 TP Shippee (10311_CR27) 2009; 49 W Langewitz (10311_CR4) 2002; 325 N Sun (10311_CR8) 2017; 5 10311_CR26 S Bai (10311_CR5) 2019; 19 VP Gopichandran (10311_CR20) 2015; 12 G Makoul (10311_CR14) 2001; 76 C Marshall (10311_CR24) 2011 KV Rhodes (10311_CR7) 2004; 44 MH Biglu (10311_CR12) 2017; 29 |
References_xml | – volume: 76 start-page: 390 issue: 4 year: 2001 ident: 10311_CR14 publication-title: Acad Med doi: 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021 – volume: 15 start-page: 74 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10311_CR18 publication-title: Med Biol – volume-title: Designing qualitative research year: 2011 ident: 10311_CR24 – volume: 12 start-page: e0170988 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10311_CR21 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988 – volume: 44 start-page: 262 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10311_CR7 publication-title: Ann Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035 – ident: 10311_CR15 – volume: 168 start-page: 1364 issue: 13 year: 2008 ident: 10311_CR1 publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1364 – volume: 325 start-page: 682 issue: 7366 year: 2002 ident: 10311_CR4 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.682 – volume: 5 start-page: 166 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10311_CR8 publication-title: Health Psychol Behav Med doi: 10.1080/21642850.2017.1286498 – volume: 20 start-page: 441 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 10311_CR23 publication-title: Acad Emerg Med doi: 10.1111/acem.12138 – volume: 168 start-page: 1387 issue: 13 year: 2008 ident: 10311_CR2 publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387 – volume: 29 start-page: 192 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 10311_CR12 publication-title: Materia Socio-Medica doi: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.192-195 – volume: 8 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 10311_CR30 publication-title: J Spec Pediatr Nurs doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2003.tb00182.x – volume: 46 start-page: 243 year: 2002 ident: 10311_CR34 publication-title: Patient Educ Couns doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5 – volume: 3 start-page: 36 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 10311_CR3 publication-title: J Healthc Commun doi: 10.4172/2472-1654.100146 – volume-title: The science of qualitative research year: 2011 ident: 10311_CR25 – volume-title: Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application year: 1992 ident: 10311_CR31 – volume: 13 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10311_CR33 publication-title: Health Commun doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1301_04 – volume: 19 start-page: 338 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10311_CR5 publication-title: BMC Med Educ doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1776-7 – volume: 8 start-page: 48 year: 2015 ident: 10311_CR6 publication-title: Int J Emerg Med doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0095-y – volume: 17 start-page: 490 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 10311_CR10 publication-title: Pediatr Crit Care Med doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000719 – volume: 17 start-page: 79 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 10311_CR16 publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x – volume: 48 start-page: 226 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10311_CR35 publication-title: J Soc Serv Res doi: 10.1080/01488376.2021.2006856 – volume: 13 start-page: 22 year: 2013 ident: 10311_CR13 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-22 – volume: 30 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 10311_CR11 publication-title: Int J Pharm Pract doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab068 – start-page: 3 volume-title: Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis year: 2002 ident: 10311_CR28 – volume: 261 start-page: 2 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10311_CR22 publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765 – volume: 18 start-page: 141 year: 2010 ident: 10311_CR32 publication-title: Int J Pharm Pract doi: 10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0003 – volume: 15 start-page: 509 issue: 7 year: 2000 ident: 10311_CR17 publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x – volume: 50 start-page: 1057 issue: 12 year: 2001 ident: 10311_CR19 publication-title: J Fam Pract – volume: 34 start-page: 999 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10311_CR36 publication-title: Pak J Med Sci doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.15136 – start-page: 165 volume-title: The sage handbook of qualitative research year: 2005 ident: 10311_CR29 – volume: 83 start-page: 185 year: 2011 ident: 10311_CR9 publication-title: Patient Educ Couns doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.016 – volume: 12 start-page: 141 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10311_CR20 publication-title: Indian J Med Ethics doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.043 – volume: 49 start-page: 418 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 10311_CR27 publication-title: The Gerontologist doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp030 – ident: 10311_CR26 |
SSID | ssj0017827 |
Score | 2.3956573 |
Snippet | Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships.... Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in... BackgroundCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships.... Abstract Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis Behavior Communication Continuing medical education Data collection Data entry Departments Emergency department Emergency medical care Emergency service Evaluation Family medicine Health aspects Hospitals Information management Interviews Medical research Medicine Patient compliance Patient education Patient-physician communication Physician and patient Physicians Questionnaires Research ethics Sample size |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NSx0xEA_Fk1BKbSt9rZYUCj3I4tt852irIoI9KXgLk-wsCmUtvif9C_y_nWSzj_cOthdhT5ls2N2ZZD525jeMfbOptVL3OVAFvlEpqiaC9Y1JkexjqaWGHNC_-GXOrtT5tb5ea_WVc8JGeODxwx0aIKHrpCfDH5XFCBBFDwio6NKiIIGSzpucqfr_gPSenUpknDlckFbLXQxEzsOSbduIDTVU0PqfO5OLojl9y95UC5EfjU-2w17h8I69HsNrfKwaes8ej2tjE9rm_HbgFR61WQUqeFqv_OA1HYuTucdxqrjkHemi-5JmzmHoeCnGWhssKwO_qa1F-AJLknQevYTbvzB8YFenJ5c_z5raUaFJyullY5wjbng1h2RUZ_reWtdbADDkYJtIREh2brDF2CcDKqbeIWYEem987EHusq3hbsCPjEevyVcjUv43ijJFiV4gCOEcdE6kGWunDxxShRvPXS9-h-J2OBNGpgRiSihMCWLGDlb3_BnBNv45-0fm22pmBsouAyQ-oYpP-J_4zNj3zPWQtzM9XoJalUAvmYGxwpG10kirhZmxvY2ZtA3TJnmSm1CPgUUQnkwo8vc1kb-uyPnOnNo24N0DzXFeCDunhT69xAt9ZtuiyDkJ-XyPbS3vH3Cf7KZl_FK2yBPSPhcB priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR1daxQxcCgVRBDRqri2SgTBB1m9TbL5eBCpH6UI51MP-hYmuawWyp7eXdH-AP-3k2z27EEt7FMyCbs7M5mPzAfASx0aLdouOarQ1jJ4WXvUtlbBk34sWtFicuhPv6rjmfxy2p7uwNjuqPzA1bWmXeonNVuev_n98_I9Mfy7zPBGvV2RzEo9CniKshJNU9ORfIskk04dDaby360CSUM9Js5cu25LOOUa_v87qbP4OboP94reyA4HRD-Andjvwe1puRnfg7uD_40NaUUP4c-n0vmEzgF21rNSP7XeeDJYuJoawkq8FiN9kMUxJZPNSVgtcxw6w37OcrbWlcG8M7LvpfcIW8UcRZ1GT_DsF_aPYHb0-eTjcV1aLtRBmnZdK2MIXVZOMCg5V12ntek0IiqywJWnSQx6omITfRcUSh86E2MqUW-V9R2Kx7DbL_r4BJi3LRlzNJUuT6MIXkTLI3JuDM4NDxU04792odQjT20xzl22S4xyA34c4cdl_DhewevNmh9DNY4boT8kFG4gUyXtPLBYfnOFMZ1COtTmwpJhGaWOHtHzDiNGSU_LZQWvEgG4RIH0egFL2gJ9ZKqc5Q61FkrolqsKDrYgiU_D9vRIQm4kc8ct6ViNIL2zgheb6bQyxb71cXFBMMZyrie00dObt9iHOzwTM1Hy5AB218uL-IxUprV_nvngL7YhE64 priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Differences in patient-physician communication between the emergency department and other departments in a hospital setting in Taiwan |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113256 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2892270773 https://doaj.org/article/6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR3bahQxNGgLIohoVZxalwiCDzJ0J8nk8iRdbSnCFiktLL6Ek0xGCzJbd7f0C_xvTzKZsftgYchDbszMueWcnAsh75WvFK_baKgCUwrvROlAmVJ6h-djXvMaokF_fiZPL8XXRb3IBrd1dqsceGJi1M3SRxv5ITMojVB1quWn699lrBoVb1dzCY2HZDemLotYrRajwlWh9FNDoIyWh2uUbbGWAYveWLyqSrYljFLO_v9x5iRuTp6Rp_mcSI96wD4nD0K3Rx7N8034HnnS29toH0b0gvz5kiudIN3Tq47mfKnlaLmg_m4oCM3-WRTPfzQMIZi0QeG0Sn7nFLqGpuisO51pZ6A_c60Rug7Jazr2XsDVLXQvyeXJ8cXn0zKXWCi90PWmlFojeIyYgpeikW2rlG4VAEjUuKXDQfBqKkMVXOslCOdbHUJMSW-kcS3wV2SnW3bhNaHO1Ki84VC8LA3cOx4MC8CY1tBo5gtSDf_a-px_PJbB-GWTHqKl7eFjET42wceygnwc11z32TfunT2LIBxnxszZqWO5-mEzIVoJyMQablCRDEIFB-BYCwGCwKdmoiAfIgLYSN_4eh5ymAJ-ZMyUZY-U4pKrmsmCHGzNRLr028MDCtnMF9b2HxYX5N04HFdGX7cuLG9wjjaMqSlutH__Fm_IY5aQGTF5ekB2Nqub8BaPSBs3SXQwIbuz47Nv55NkaMB2LjS257PvfwFUKRUE |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtQwcFSKBEgIQQERKGAkEAcUNXES2zkgVCjVlnZ72kp7M2PHgUooW3a3qvgAfodvZOw4S_dAb5VysseW4xnPeMbzAHgtbS6LqvWGKqzT0poyNSjrVFhD9-OiKir0Bv3xsRidlF-m1XQD_gyxMN6tcuCJgVE3M-tt5Du8JmlEqlMlPpz9TH3VKP-6OpTQ6Mni0P26IJVt8f5gj_D7hvP9z5NPozRWFUhtqaplKpSiFdVlhlaUjWhbKVUrEVGQkikMdaKVmXC5M60VWBrbKud8FvZa1KbFgua9ATdJ8GZe2ZPTlYKXk7SVQ2COEjsLkqW-dgL33l9Fnqd8TfiFGgH_kwRBvO3fh3vxXsp2e0J6ABuu24Jb4_jyvgV3e_se68OWHsLvvVhZhfgMO-1YzM-ariwlzF4OPWHRH4zRfZO5IeSTNSQM58HPnWHXsBANdqkxzIzse6xtwhYueGn71gmeXmD3CE6uZfMfw2Y369wTYKauSFmkLv846wprCldzh5wrhY3iNoF82GttY75zX3bjhw56jxK6x48m_OiAH80TeLcac9Zn-7gS-qNH4QrSZ-oODbP5Nx0PvhZITLMpalJcXSmdQTS8RYeupK_iZQJvPQFoz09oeRZjWAT9pM_MpXelLEQhKy4S2F6DJD5g17sHEtKRDy30v1OTwKtVtx_pfes6NzsnGFVzLjOa6OnVU7yE26PJ-EgfHRwfPoM7PBA2UXW2DZvL-bl7TtezpXkRzgSDr9d9CP8C4w9QZw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+in+patient-physician+communication+between+the+emergency+department+and+other+departments+in+a+hospital+setting+in+Taiwan&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yi-Fen&rft.au=Ya-Hui%2C+Lee&rft.au=Chen-Wei%2C+Lee&rft.au=Yu-Ze+Shih&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-023-10311-2 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |