Differences in patient-physician communication between the emergency department and other departments in a hospital setting in Taiwan

Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. How...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC health services research Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors Wang, Yi-Fen, Lee, Ya-Hui, Lee, Chen-Wei, Shih, Yu-Ze, Lee, Yi-Kung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 20.11.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. Keywords: Emergency department, Patient-physician communication, Continuing medical education
AbstractList Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care. Keywords: Emergency department, Patient-physician communication, Continuing medical education
Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings--internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps--greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship--had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care.
Abstract Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared. Objectives This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings—internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments. Methods Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires. Results Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps—greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship—had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments. Conclusions To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients’ active engagement in their health care.
BackgroundCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.ObjectivesThis study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings—internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.MethodsBoth qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.ResultsPatient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps—greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship—had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.ConclusionsTo improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients’ active engagement in their health care.
Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.BACKGROUNDCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in the emergency department may be different from that in other departments due to differences in medical purposes and treatments. However, the characteristics of communication in the clinical settings of various departments have not been explored nor compared.This study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings-internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to construct the steps in patient-physician communication based on the Roter Communication Model and compare communication performance between the emergency department and three other clinical settings-internal medicine, surgery, and family medicine departments.Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.METHODSBoth qualitative and quantitative approaches were adopted. First, in-depth interviews were used to analyze clinical communication steps and meanings. Then, a quantitative questionnaire was designed based on the interview results to investigate differences in communication between the emergency department and the other three departments. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from 20 interviews and 98 valid questionnaires.Patient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps-greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship-had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.RESULTSPatient-physician communication consists of four steps and ten factors. The four steps-greeting and data gathering, patient education and counseling, facilitation and patient activation, and building a relationship-had significant progressive effects. Patient education and counseling had an additional significant effect on building a relationship. The emergency department performed less well in the facilitation and patient activation, building a relationship step and the evaluation method, enhancement method, and attitude factors than the other departments.To improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care.CONCLUSIONSTo improve the quality of patient-physician communication in the emergency department, physicians should strengthen the steps of facilitation and patient activation to encourage patients' active engagement in their health care.
ArticleNumber 1279
Audience Academic
Author Lee, Ya-Hui
Lee, Chen-Wei
Shih, Yu-Ze
Wang, Yi-Fen
Lee, Yi-Kung
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yi-Fen
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yi-Fen
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ya-Hui
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Ya-Hui
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chen-Wei
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Chen-Wei
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yu-Ze
  surname: Shih
  fullname: Shih, Yu-Ze
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yi-Kung
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Yi-Kung
BookMark eNp9UstqHDEQHIIDsZ38QE6CXHIZR6-VZo7GeRkMuThn0aNp7WqZkSaSFrMfkP-2djchjglBAonqqtKj66I5CzFg07xl9IqxTn3IjPdMtJSLllHBWMtfNOdMat6qXomzJ_tXzUXOW0qZ7rg-b35-9M5hwmAxEx_IAsVjKO2y2WdvPQRi4zzvgre1EAMZsDwgBlI2SHDGtK7KPRlxgVTmKiQQRhJrNT0Bj85ANjEvvsBEMpbiw_qA3oN_gPC6eelgyvjm13rZfP_86f7ma3v37cvtzfVda2W3Kq3qOjvIXlKwSo7KOa07pwFA4cDVUItgNVXIcHBWgRys6xClUrJX_eBAXDa3J98xwtYsyc-Q9iaCN0cgprWpV_Z2QqOAdWIUPZMSpcYBYOAOEFDWueKyer0_eS0p_thhLmb22eI0QcC4y4Z3Peeaai0q9d0z6jbuUqgvNbynnDHBV-oPaw31fB9cLAnswdRcVxcl9IofWFf_YNUx4uxtTYXzFf9L0J0ENsWcEzpjaxMOzaxCPxlGzSFC5hQhUyNkjhEyvEr5M-nvL_uP6BE_Q81I
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cegh_2024_101892
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12873_024_01001_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_024_01074_4
Cites_doi 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021
10.1371/journal.pone.0170988
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035
10.1001/archinte.168.13.1364
10.1136/bmj.325.7366.682
10.1080/21642850.2017.1286498
10.1111/acem.12138
10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387
10.5455/msm.2017.29.192-195
10.1111/j.1744-6155.2003.tb00182.x
10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5
10.4172/2472-1654.100146
10.1207/S15327027HC1301_04
10.1186/s12909-019-1776-7
10.1186/s12245-015-0095-y
10.1097/PCC.0000000000000719
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x
10.1080/01488376.2021.2006856
10.1186/1472-6963-13-22
10.1093/ijpp/riab068
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765
10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0003
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x
10.12669/pjms.344.15136
10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.016
10.20529/IJME.2015.043
10.1093/geront/gnp030
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2023. The Author(s).
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7RV
7WY
7WZ
7X7
7XB
87Z
88C
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8FL
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FRNLG
FYUFA
F~G
GHDGH
K60
K6~
K9.
KB0
L.-
M0C
M0S
M0T
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12913-023-10311-2
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Global
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals [open access]
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
Medicine
EISSN 1472-6963
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524
A773637526
10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2
GeographicLocations Taiwan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Taiwan
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
44B
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7RV
7WY
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FL
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BEZIV
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRNLG
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
K60
K6~
KQ8
M0C
M0T
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
K9.
L.-
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-688cb4940ac64d6ff778f7aaa6eb26b8cbac706e1ebfc6a4bcf8ee4664969bfa3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1472-6963
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:28 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 24 03:44:54 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 04:50:13 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:23:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:15:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:29:07 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:56 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c485t-688cb4940ac64d6ff778f7aaa6eb26b8cbac706e1ebfc6a4bcf8ee4664969bfa3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113256?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PQID 2902113256
PQPubID 44821
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524
proquest_miscellaneous_2892270773
proquest_journals_2902113256
gale_infotracmisc_A773637526
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A773637526
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_10311_2
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-11-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-11-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-11-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle BMC health services research
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References ML McHugh (10311_CR30) 2003; 8
SD Goold (10311_CR16) 2002; 17
E Krupat (10311_CR19) 2001; 50
TW October (10311_CR10) 2016; 17
SD Pearson (10311_CR17) 2000; 15
LB Mauksch (10311_CR2) 2008; 168
SB Merriam (10311_CR28) 2002
10311_CR15
L Vail (10311_CR9) 2011; 83
NM Bakic-Miric (10311_CR18) 2008; 15
J Birkhauer (10311_CR21) 2017; 12
S Alsubaie (10311_CR11) 2022; 30
TC Tsai (10311_CR22) 2015; 261
DM McCarthy (10311_CR23) 2013; 20
S Chandra (10311_CR3) 2018; 3
D Roter (10311_CR33) 2001; 13
J Pun (10311_CR6) 2015; 8
A Cavaco (10311_CR32) 2010; 18
YS Lincoln (10311_CR29) 2005
D Roter (10311_CR34) 2002; 46
CS Chang (10311_CR13) 2013; 13
O Unal (10311_CR36) 2018; 34
JY Lu (10311_CR35) 2021; 48
LR Gay (10311_CR31) 1992
R Nelson (10311_CR1) 2008; 168
M Packer (10311_CR25) 2011
TP Shippee (10311_CR27) 2009; 49
W Langewitz (10311_CR4) 2002; 325
N Sun (10311_CR8) 2017; 5
10311_CR26
S Bai (10311_CR5) 2019; 19
VP Gopichandran (10311_CR20) 2015; 12
G Makoul (10311_CR14) 2001; 76
C Marshall (10311_CR24) 2011
KV Rhodes (10311_CR7) 2004; 44
MH Biglu (10311_CR12) 2017; 29
References_xml – volume: 76
  start-page: 390
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10311_CR14
  publication-title: Acad Med
  doi: 10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021
– volume: 15
  start-page: 74
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 10311_CR18
  publication-title: Med Biol
– volume-title: Designing qualitative research
  year: 2011
  ident: 10311_CR24
– volume: 12
  start-page: e0170988
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 10311_CR21
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988
– volume: 44
  start-page: 262
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 10311_CR7
  publication-title: Ann Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035
– ident: 10311_CR15
– volume: 168
  start-page: 1364
  issue: 13
  year: 2008
  ident: 10311_CR1
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1364
– volume: 325
  start-page: 682
  issue: 7366
  year: 2002
  ident: 10311_CR4
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.682
– volume: 5
  start-page: 166
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10311_CR8
  publication-title: Health Psychol Behav Med
  doi: 10.1080/21642850.2017.1286498
– volume: 20
  start-page: 441
  issue: 5
  year: 2013
  ident: 10311_CR23
  publication-title: Acad Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1111/acem.12138
– volume: 168
  start-page: 1387
  issue: 13
  year: 2008
  ident: 10311_CR2
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387
– volume: 29
  start-page: 192
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 10311_CR12
  publication-title: Materia Socio-Medica
  doi: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.192-195
– volume: 8
  start-page: 35
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10311_CR30
  publication-title: J Spec Pediatr Nurs
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2003.tb00182.x
– volume: 46
  start-page: 243
  year: 2002
  ident: 10311_CR34
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5
– volume: 3
  start-page: 36
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 10311_CR3
  publication-title: J Healthc Commun
  doi: 10.4172/2472-1654.100146
– volume-title: The science of qualitative research
  year: 2011
  ident: 10311_CR25
– volume-title: Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application
  year: 1992
  ident: 10311_CR31
– volume: 13
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 10311_CR33
  publication-title: Health Commun
  doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1301_04
– volume: 19
  start-page: 338
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 10311_CR5
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1776-7
– volume: 8
  start-page: 48
  year: 2015
  ident: 10311_CR6
  publication-title: Int J Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0095-y
– volume: 17
  start-page: 490
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 10311_CR10
  publication-title: Pediatr Crit Care Med
  doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000719
– volume: 17
  start-page: 79
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 10311_CR16
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x
– volume: 48
  start-page: 226
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 10311_CR35
  publication-title: J Soc Serv Res
  doi: 10.1080/01488376.2021.2006856
– volume: 13
  start-page: 22
  year: 2013
  ident: 10311_CR13
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-22
– volume: 30
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 10311_CR11
  publication-title: Int J Pharm Pract
  doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab068
– start-page: 3
  volume-title: Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis
  year: 2002
  ident: 10311_CR28
– volume: 261
  start-page: 2
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10311_CR22
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765
– volume: 18
  start-page: 141
  year: 2010
  ident: 10311_CR32
  publication-title: Int J Pharm Pract
  doi: 10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0003
– volume: 15
  start-page: 509
  issue: 7
  year: 2000
  ident: 10311_CR17
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1057
  issue: 12
  year: 2001
  ident: 10311_CR19
  publication-title: J Fam Pract
– volume: 34
  start-page: 999
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10311_CR36
  publication-title: Pak J Med Sci
  doi: 10.12669/pjms.344.15136
– start-page: 165
  volume-title: The sage handbook of qualitative research
  year: 2005
  ident: 10311_CR29
– volume: 83
  start-page: 185
  year: 2011
  ident: 10311_CR9
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.016
– volume: 12
  start-page: 141
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 10311_CR20
  publication-title: Indian J Med Ethics
  doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.043
– volume: 49
  start-page: 418
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 10311_CR27
  publication-title: The Gerontologist
  doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp030
– ident: 10311_CR26
SSID ssj0017827
Score 2.3956573
Snippet Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships....
Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships. Communication in...
BackgroundCommunication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build relationships....
Abstract Background Communication fosters trust and understanding between patients and physicians, and specific communication steps help to build...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Analysis
Behavior
Communication
Continuing medical education
Data collection
Data entry
Departments
Emergency department
Emergency medical care
Emergency service
Evaluation
Family medicine
Health aspects
Hospitals
Information management
Interviews
Medical research
Medicine
Patient compliance
Patient education
Patient-physician communication
Physician and patient
Physicians
Questionnaires
Research ethics
Sample size
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NSx0xEA_Fk1BKbSt9rZYUCj3I4tt852irIoI9KXgLk-wsCmUtvif9C_y_nWSzj_cOthdhT5ls2N2ZZD525jeMfbOptVL3OVAFvlEpqiaC9Y1JkexjqaWGHNC_-GXOrtT5tb5ea_WVc8JGeODxwx0aIKHrpCfDH5XFCBBFDwio6NKiIIGSzpucqfr_gPSenUpknDlckFbLXQxEzsOSbduIDTVU0PqfO5OLojl9y95UC5EfjU-2w17h8I69HsNrfKwaes8ej2tjE9rm_HbgFR61WQUqeFqv_OA1HYuTucdxqrjkHemi-5JmzmHoeCnGWhssKwO_qa1F-AJLknQevYTbvzB8YFenJ5c_z5raUaFJyullY5wjbng1h2RUZ_reWtdbADDkYJtIREh2brDF2CcDKqbeIWYEem987EHusq3hbsCPjEevyVcjUv43ijJFiV4gCOEcdE6kGWunDxxShRvPXS9-h-J2OBNGpgRiSihMCWLGDlb3_BnBNv45-0fm22pmBsouAyQ-oYpP-J_4zNj3zPWQtzM9XoJalUAvmYGxwpG10kirhZmxvY2ZtA3TJnmSm1CPgUUQnkwo8vc1kb-uyPnOnNo24N0DzXFeCDunhT69xAt9ZtuiyDkJ-XyPbS3vH3Cf7KZl_FK2yBPSPhcB
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR1daxQxcCgVRBDRqri2SgTBB1m9TbL5eBCpH6UI51MP-hYmuawWyp7eXdH-AP-3k2z27EEt7FMyCbs7M5mPzAfASx0aLdouOarQ1jJ4WXvUtlbBk34sWtFicuhPv6rjmfxy2p7uwNjuqPzA1bWmXeonNVuev_n98_I9Mfy7zPBGvV2RzEo9CniKshJNU9ORfIskk04dDaby360CSUM9Js5cu25LOOUa_v87qbP4OboP94reyA4HRD-Andjvwe1puRnfg7uD_40NaUUP4c-n0vmEzgF21rNSP7XeeDJYuJoawkq8FiN9kMUxJZPNSVgtcxw6w37OcrbWlcG8M7LvpfcIW8UcRZ1GT_DsF_aPYHb0-eTjcV1aLtRBmnZdK2MIXVZOMCg5V12ntek0IiqywJWnSQx6omITfRcUSh86E2MqUW-V9R2Kx7DbL_r4BJi3LRlzNJUuT6MIXkTLI3JuDM4NDxU04792odQjT20xzl22S4xyA34c4cdl_DhewevNmh9DNY4boT8kFG4gUyXtPLBYfnOFMZ1COtTmwpJhGaWOHtHzDiNGSU_LZQWvEgG4RIH0egFL2gJ9ZKqc5Q61FkrolqsKDrYgiU_D9vRIQm4kc8ct6ViNIL2zgheb6bQyxb71cXFBMMZyrie00dObt9iHOzwTM1Hy5AB218uL-IxUprV_nvngL7YhE64
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Differences in patient-physician communication between the emergency department and other departments in a hospital setting in Taiwan
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902113256
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2892270773
https://doaj.org/article/6a183d39144e47ebaab2faeae4ae4524
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR3bahQxNGgLIohoVZxalwiCDzJ0J8nk8iRdbSnCFiktLL6Ek0xGCzJbd7f0C_xvTzKZsftgYchDbszMueWcnAsh75WvFK_baKgCUwrvROlAmVJ6h-djXvMaokF_fiZPL8XXRb3IBrd1dqsceGJi1M3SRxv5ITMojVB1quWn699lrBoVb1dzCY2HZDemLotYrRajwlWh9FNDoIyWh2uUbbGWAYveWLyqSrYljFLO_v9x5iRuTp6Rp_mcSI96wD4nD0K3Rx7N8034HnnS29toH0b0gvz5kiudIN3Tq47mfKnlaLmg_m4oCM3-WRTPfzQMIZi0QeG0Sn7nFLqGpuisO51pZ6A_c60Rug7Jazr2XsDVLXQvyeXJ8cXn0zKXWCi90PWmlFojeIyYgpeikW2rlG4VAEjUuKXDQfBqKkMVXOslCOdbHUJMSW-kcS3wV2SnW3bhNaHO1Ki84VC8LA3cOx4MC8CY1tBo5gtSDf_a-px_PJbB-GWTHqKl7eFjET42wceygnwc11z32TfunT2LIBxnxszZqWO5-mEzIVoJyMQablCRDEIFB-BYCwGCwKdmoiAfIgLYSN_4eh5ymAJ-ZMyUZY-U4pKrmsmCHGzNRLr028MDCtnMF9b2HxYX5N04HFdGX7cuLG9wjjaMqSlutH__Fm_IY5aQGTF5ekB2Nqub8BaPSBs3SXQwIbuz47Nv55NkaMB2LjS257PvfwFUKRUE
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtQwcFSKBEgIQQERKGAkEAcUNXES2zkgVCjVlnZ72kp7M2PHgUooW3a3qvgAfodvZOw4S_dAb5VysseW4xnPeMbzAHgtbS6LqvWGKqzT0poyNSjrVFhD9-OiKir0Bv3xsRidlF-m1XQD_gyxMN6tcuCJgVE3M-tt5Du8JmlEqlMlPpz9TH3VKP-6OpTQ6Mni0P26IJVt8f5gj_D7hvP9z5NPozRWFUhtqaplKpSiFdVlhlaUjWhbKVUrEVGQkikMdaKVmXC5M60VWBrbKud8FvZa1KbFgua9ATdJ8GZe2ZPTlYKXk7SVQ2COEjsLkqW-dgL33l9Fnqd8TfiFGgH_kwRBvO3fh3vxXsp2e0J6ABuu24Jb4_jyvgV3e_se68OWHsLvvVhZhfgMO-1YzM-ariwlzF4OPWHRH4zRfZO5IeSTNSQM58HPnWHXsBANdqkxzIzse6xtwhYueGn71gmeXmD3CE6uZfMfw2Y369wTYKauSFmkLv846wprCldzh5wrhY3iNoF82GttY75zX3bjhw56jxK6x48m_OiAH80TeLcac9Zn-7gS-qNH4QrSZ-oODbP5Nx0PvhZITLMpalJcXSmdQTS8RYeupK_iZQJvPQFoz09oeRZjWAT9pM_MpXelLEQhKy4S2F6DJD5g17sHEtKRDy30v1OTwKtVtx_pfes6NzsnGFVzLjOa6OnVU7yE26PJ-EgfHRwfPoM7PBA2UXW2DZvL-bl7TtezpXkRzgSDr9d9CP8C4w9QZw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+in+patient-physician+communication+between+the+emergency+department+and+other+departments+in+a+hospital+setting+in+Taiwan&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yi-Fen&rft.au=Ya-Hui%2C+Lee&rft.au=Chen-Wei%2C+Lee&rft.au=Yu-Ze+Shih&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-023-10311-2
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon