Computer-aided diagnosis of keratoconus through VAE-augmented images using deep learning

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 20586 - 15
• Main Authors: Agharezaei, Zhila, Firouzi, Reza, Hassanzadeh, Samira, Zarei-Ghanavati, Siamak, Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz, Golabpour, Amin, Akbarzadeh, Reyhaneh, Agharezaei, Laleh, Bakhshali, Mohamad Amin, Sedaghat, Mohammad Reza, Eslami, Saeid
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 23.11.2023; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/114/2164; 692/700/1421; Accuracy; Computers; Cornea; Deep Learning; Diagnosis; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Keratoconus; Keratoconus - diagnostic imaging; Medical personnel; multidisciplinary; Neural networks; Neural Networks, Computer; Retrospective Studies; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Topographic mapping
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46903-5
• ISSN: 2045-2322

Detecting clinical keratoconus (KCN) poses a challenging and time-consuming task. During the diagnostic process, ophthalmologists are required to review demographic and clinical ophthalmic examinations in order to make an accurate diagnosis. This study aims to develop and evaluate the accuracy of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models for the detection of keratoconus (KCN) using corneal topographic maps. We retrospectively collected 1758 corneal images (978 normal and 780 keratoconus) from 1010 subjects of the KCN group with clinically evident keratoconus and the normal group with regular astigmatism. To expand the dataset, we developed a model using Variational Auto Encoder (VAE) to generate and augment images, resulting in a dataset of 4000 samples. Four deep learning models were used to extract and identify deep corneal features of original and synthesized images. We demonstrated that the utilization of synthesized images during training process increased classification performance. The overall average accuracy of the deep learning models ranged from 99% for VGG16 to 95% for EfficientNet-B0. All CNN models exhibited sensitivity and specificity above 0.94, with the VGG16 model achieving an AUC of 0.99. The customized CNN model achieved satisfactory results with an accuracy and AUC of 0.97 at a much faster processing speed compared to other models. In conclusion, the DL models showed high accuracy in screening for keratoconus based on corneal topography images. This is a development toward the potential clinical implementation of a more enhanced computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for KCN detection, which would aid ophthalmologists in validating the clinical decision and carrying out prompt and precise KCN treatment.