Improvement in regression of corn yield with plant height using relative data

• Published in: Journal of the science of food and agriculture Vol. 91; no. 14; pp. 2606 - 2612
• Main Authors: Yin, Xinhua, McClure, M Angela, Hayes, Robert M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.11.2011; Wiley; John Wiley and Sons, Limited
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Agriculture; Agriculture - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Cereal and baking product industries; Coefficients; Corn; Crop science; Crops, Agricultural; Crops, Agricultural - growth & development; Effectiveness studies; field experimentation; Food industries; Foods; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Glycine max - growth & development; Gossypium; Gossypium - growth & development; growth & development; linear models; methods; Models, Biological; multiple cropping; nitrogen; Nitrogen Cycle; Plant growth; plant height; precision agriculture; Regression; Regression analysis; relative plant height; relative yield; Reproducibility of Results; Soybeans; Statistics as Topic; Tennessee; yield; Zea mays; Zea mays - growth & development; Tennessee; Improvement; relative yield; regression; relative plant height; Corn; Cereal; Height; Yield; plant height
• ISSN: 0022-5142; 1097-0010; 1097-0010
• DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4477

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach of analyzing absolute variable data across multiple locations and/or years has drawbacks in precision agriculture. This study was conducted to evaluate the impacts of using relative yield and plant height data of corn (Zea mays L.) on the regression of yield with plant height using linear and exponential models in a nitrogen (N) rate field trial under four cropping systems. RESULTS: The use of relative yield to replace absolute yield frequently increased the determination coefficient (R2) values in the regression of yield with plant height on datasets combined across cropping systems or/and years. Relative yield and relative plant height sometimes further enhanced the R2 values compared with relative yield and absolute plant height. All these improvements mostly occurred when the fit of the model was not strong with absolute yield and absolute plant height or relative yield and absolute plant height. The advantages of using relative data of yield or/and plant height were similar for the two regression models. CONCLUSION: The use of relative yield or relative data of both yield and plant height may be effective in improving the regression of corn yield with plant height across multiple cropping systems/locations and years in precision agriculture. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry