Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Screening on Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Community-Based Prospective Cohort

This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer research and treatment Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 582 - 589
Main Authors Kim, Heewon, Hwang, Yunji, Sung, Hokyung, Jang, Jieun, Ahn, Choonghyun, Kim, Sang Gyun, Yoo, Keun-Young, Park, Sue K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Cancer Association 01.04.2018
대한암학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival. The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening.
AbstractList Purpose This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. Materials and Methods A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects ( 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening. KCI Citation Count: 0
This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.PURPOSEThis study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).MATERIALS AND METHODSA total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.RESULTSThe GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening.CONCLUSIONThe findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening.
This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival. The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening.
Author Hwang, Yunji
Sung, Hokyung
Park, Sue K.
Jang, Jieun
Kim, Heewon
Ahn, Choonghyun
Yoo, Keun-Young
Kim, Sang Gyun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Heewon
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Heewon
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yunji
  surname: Hwang
  fullname: Hwang, Yunji
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hokyung
  surname: Sung
  fullname: Sung, Hokyung
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jieun
  surname: Jang
  fullname: Jang, Jieun
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Choonghyun
  surname: Ahn
  fullname: Ahn, Choonghyun
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sang Gyun
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Sang Gyun
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Keun-Young
  surname: Yoo
  fullname: Yoo, Keun-Young
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Sue K.
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Sue K.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28602053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002335606$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNptkd1rFDEUxYNU7Lb65rPkUcFZ8zUzyYtQl7YuVBStzyFzJ2ljZ5Ntki0U__lmu7Vo8ekmnN89J-QcoL0Qg0XoNSVzQQX_AKnMGaH9nAj5DM0YIW2jWNvtoRltlWyYUnIfHeT8i5BO8J6-QPtMdoSRls_Q72PnLBR_Y4PNGUeHT00uyQNemAA24R-QrA0-XOAYnmrLAH609YhNGPGXmIqZfLnFPmCDF3G12oR6bT6ZbEf8LcW83kVV7bLCL9FzZ6ZsXz3MQ_Tz5Ph88bk5-3q6XBydNSCkKI3rGRtg7IFxQ0TLR2DMCaE4c2QAI_lge9vz0UroHOvq5GYYhWqBdBIGxw_Ru51vSE5fgdfR-Pt5EfVV0kffz5ea05aSVlT2445db4aVHcGGksyk18mvTLq93_xXCf6y-tzoVlFGOasGbx8MUrze2Fz0ymew02SCjZusqSKyV71UtKJv_s56DPnTTgXe7wCof5eTdY8IJXpbvq7l6235upZfcfYEB19M8XH7Uj_9f-kOGU21GQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2018_085
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2021_09_039
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2024_2408278
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_023_02010_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_09889_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2019_12_009
crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v16_i5_1737
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_029638
crossref_primary_10_7704_kjhugr_2024_0039
crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_goab010
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_061038
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4165635
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hoc_2024_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2018_02_023
crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl210313
crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S400908
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_35197
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2019_05_012
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_20558_x
crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2024_8611
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apjon_2023_100220
crossref_primary_10_5124_jkma_2022_65_5_250
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_021_00639_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanwpc_2023_100741
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocel_2023_106407
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_19104_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_020_01517_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2018_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2023_01_018
crossref_primary_10_1089_omi_2023_0015
crossref_primary_10_1039_D0AY00627K
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12935_025_03756_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lfs_2020_117774
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41417_023_00657_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms231911022
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000021420
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09201_3
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1728_5673
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2019_2916632
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_976854
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ebiom_2022_104340
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33490
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16064
crossref_primary_10_4236_jbm_2025_133021
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_019_00222_z
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_15619_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e23167
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2018_04_026
crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_15545
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2021_03_004
crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2019_170
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2022_06_032
crossref_primary_10_14216_kjco_18013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cellsig_2025_111741
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_073925
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_1093324
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers11091244
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_06_039
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10565_024_09920_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_3462
crossref_primary_10_7189_jogh_12_11014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2024_02_008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2023_1184754
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2021_713895
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtbi_2019_109996
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_13413_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_025_01762_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_20_31288_5
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0040_1714307
crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2022_22_e22
Cites_doi 10.1111/ajr.12064
10.1080/00365520802085395
10.1093/jjco/hyn017
10.1111/jgh.12387
10.1093/jjco/hyq091
10.1002/ijc.21664
10.1371/journal.pone.0050041
10.1371/journal.pone.0079088
10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.025
10.1007/PL00011735
10.1002/ijc.29210
10.1038/bjc.1994.216
10.1159/000326857
10.1093/jjco/hyn026
10.1007/s12664-013-0378-2
10.1038/bjc.2014.608
10.4143/crt.2015.066
10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5672
10.1002/ijc.2910600106
10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.016
10.1006/pmed.1999.0507
10.1023/A:1022596104796
10.1002/cncr.10646
10.1097/MD.0000000000000533
10.1097/MEG.0b013e328318ed42
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.4143/crt.2017.048
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-9256
EndPage 589
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3151054
PMC5912132
28602053
10_4143_crt_2017_048
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29B
5-W
53G
8JR
9ZL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ACYCR
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EF.
F5P
HYE
OK1
RPM
TR2
C1A
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f722bcd7c23a0453dc22f44932f0bca83be7e73de8c6f26de83abd495c068cbf3
ISSN 1598-2998
2005-9256
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:55:05 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:30:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:59:06 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:43:19 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:18:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastroscopy
Mortality
Stomach neoplasms
Cohort studies
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c484t-f722bcd7c23a0453dc22f44932f0bca83be7e73de8c6f26de83abd495c068cbf3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5912132
PMID 28602053
PQID 1908797891
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3151054
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5912132
proquest_miscellaneous_1908797891
pubmed_primary_28602053
crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2017_048
crossref_citationtrail_10_4143_crt_2017_048
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Cancer research and treatment
PublicationTitleAlternate Cancer Res Treat
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Korean Cancer Association
대한암학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Cancer Association
– name: 대한암학회
References (ref5) 2015
ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref11
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref20
ref22
Oh (ref27) 2011
ref21
ref28
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
Tashiro (ref25) 2006
ref4
ref3
ref6
Yoo (ref10) 2002
References_xml – ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1111/ajr.12064
– start-page: 4873
  volume-title: Comparing mass screening techniques for gastric cancer in Japan
  year: 2006
  ident: ref25
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1080/00365520802085395
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn017
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1111/jgh.12387
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq091
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.21664
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050041
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079088
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.025
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1007/PL00011735
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210
– start-page: 85
  volume-title: Korean multi-center cancer cohort study including a biological materials bank (KMCC-I)
  year: 2002
  ident: ref10
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.216
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1159/000326857
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn026
– start-page: 277
  volume-title: Quality control of upper gastrointestinal seriese (UGIS) by the Image Quality Evaluation Table of Korea and Japan
  year: 2011
  ident: ref27
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1007/s12664-013-0378-2
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.608
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.066
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5672
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910600106
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.016
– volume-title: Cancer Facts & Figures 2015 [Internet]
  year: 2015
  ident: ref5
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0507
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1023/A:1022596104796
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.10646
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000533
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328318ed42
SSID ssj0064371
Score 2.3847969
Snippet This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean...
Purpose This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 582
SubjectTerms Original
의약학
Title Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Screening on Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Community-Based Prospective Cohort
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28602053
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1908797891
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5912132
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002335606
Volume 50
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 50(2), , pp.582-589
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdYJyFeEN-ULxkET1VG63zYflzHSkHbeGml8mQljsNCNweVVtPgn-ccO19VkQYvSWVHdpXf5Xxn3_0Oobc0TjkhCfdkKDk4KEHkJSPpmyjzMCRDSrkyG_qnZ9F0HnxehIvmuKDMLlknB_LXzryS_0EV2gBXkyX7D8jWg0ID_AZ84QoIw_VGGFvq4Upfgdn3MTZlOOTgyGC5gg_XRNWUcc16uw8Ug60nakMtSivcWOS5HsQDlzayvvbGsMqV6QRVSib0nRfdHX03ouMNsqlydQB7c8h_aZc5ddWc_E-v3Hb1143-njcHVLZxWiyvN25lLekAXPRwrja6vVsxYq0gl1KplcynnISO_npHm9PKlo7WSR9pqdjQFivaVv0BGH6Al1yZANkRPRhaAs8uw_bZFzGZn5yI2fFitof2CbgWpIf2D8cfxpNq_TYnmcZNr_-VTZcw479vj94xZPb0Ktvlo2yH2rZsl9k9dNc5HfjQStB9dEvpB-j2qQureIh-dwQJFxl2woIttLgWJFzo7b5akDDgjmtBwrnGMd4SJNwSJGwF6RGaT45nR1PPVeXwZMCCtZfBO0tkSiXxY_AH_FQSkgUB-AHZMJEx8xNFFfVTxWSUkQjufpyk4IfLYcRkkvmPUU8XWj1FmPFwmMUhg4UjDhJGWRRkPOIyBCM9VSTqo0H1ioV0lPWmcsqFANfVACIAEGEAEQBIH72rn_5hqVr-8twbQEssZS4Mt7q5fyvEciXAg_wk_JFxOYI-el2BKUDhmlO0WKti81OABc0op4yP-uiJBbeejpiKbrCs9RHtwF4_YCbs9uj8vCR1D7khVyTPbjDvc3Sn-bReoN56tVEvwTReJ6-cLP8B-Fq-0g
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+Gastric+Cancer+Screening+on+Gastric+Cancer+Incidence+and+Mortality+in+a+Community-Based+Prospective+Cohort&rft.jtitle=Cancer+research+and+treatment&rft.au=Kim%2C+Heewon&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Yunji&rft.au=Sung%2C+Hokyung&rft.au=Jang%2C+Jieun&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.issn=2005-9256&rft.eissn=2005-9256&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=582&rft_id=info:doi/10.4143%2Fcrt.2017.048&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon