Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Screening on Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Community-Based Prospective Cohort
This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscop...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer research and treatment Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 582 - 589 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Korean Cancer Association
01.04.2018
대한암학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.
A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex,
infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.
The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.
Materials and Methods A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects ( 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.
Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening. KCI Citation Count: 0 This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.PURPOSEThis study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up.A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).MATERIALS AND METHODSA total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI).The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.RESULTSThe GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival.The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening.CONCLUSIONThe findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) with over a 10-year follow-up. A total 10,909 and 4,773 subjects from the KMCC with information on gastroendoscopy (GE) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, infection, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The GE screened subjects had almost half the risk of GC-specific death than that of unscreened subjects (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.94). Among the GC patients, GE screenees had a 2.24-fold higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.11). In particular, GE screenees who underwent two or more screening episodes had a higher survival rate than that of the non-screenees (HR, 13.11; 95% CI, 7.38 to 23.30). The effectiveness of GE screening on reduced GC mortality and increased survival rate of GC patients was better in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years old) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.95 and HR, 8.84; 95% CI, 3.63 to 21.57, respectively) than that in younger subjects (< 65 years old) (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.29 and HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, respectively). In contrast, UGIS screening had no significant relation to GC mortality and survival. The findings of this study suggest that a decreased GC-specific mortality and improved survival rate in GC patients can be achieved through GE screening. |
Author | Hwang, Yunji Sung, Hokyung Park, Sue K. Jang, Jieun Kim, Heewon Ahn, Choonghyun Yoo, Keun-Young Kim, Sang Gyun |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Heewon surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Heewon – sequence: 2 givenname: Yunji surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Yunji – sequence: 3 givenname: Hokyung surname: Sung fullname: Sung, Hokyung – sequence: 4 givenname: Jieun surname: Jang fullname: Jang, Jieun – sequence: 5 givenname: Choonghyun surname: Ahn fullname: Ahn, Choonghyun – sequence: 6 givenname: Sang Gyun surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Sang Gyun – sequence: 7 givenname: Keun-Young surname: Yoo fullname: Yoo, Keun-Young – sequence: 8 givenname: Sue K. surname: Park fullname: Park, Sue K. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28602053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002335606$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNptkd1rFDEUxYNU7Lb65rPkUcFZ8zUzyYtQl7YuVBStzyFzJ2ljZ5Ntki0U__lmu7Vo8ekmnN89J-QcoL0Qg0XoNSVzQQX_AKnMGaH9nAj5DM0YIW2jWNvtoRltlWyYUnIfHeT8i5BO8J6-QPtMdoSRls_Q72PnLBR_Y4PNGUeHT00uyQNemAA24R-QrA0-XOAYnmrLAH609YhNGPGXmIqZfLnFPmCDF3G12oR6bT6ZbEf8LcW83kVV7bLCL9FzZ6ZsXz3MQ_Tz5Ph88bk5-3q6XBydNSCkKI3rGRtg7IFxQ0TLR2DMCaE4c2QAI_lge9vz0UroHOvq5GYYhWqBdBIGxw_Ru51vSE5fgdfR-Pt5EfVV0kffz5ea05aSVlT2445db4aVHcGGksyk18mvTLq93_xXCf6y-tzoVlFGOasGbx8MUrze2Fz0ymew02SCjZusqSKyV71UtKJv_s56DPnTTgXe7wCof5eTdY8IJXpbvq7l6235upZfcfYEB19M8XH7Uj_9f-kOGU21GQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2018_085 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2021_09_039 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2024_2408278 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00535_023_02010_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_09889_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2019_12_009 crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v16_i5_1737 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_029638 crossref_primary_10_7704_kjhugr_2024_0039 crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_goab010 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_061038 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4165635 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hoc_2024_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2018_02_023 crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl210313 crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S400908 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_35197 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2019_05_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_20558_x crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2024_8611 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apjon_2023_100220 crossref_primary_10_5124_jkma_2022_65_5_250 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_021_00639_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanwpc_2023_100741 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocel_2023_106407 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_19104_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_020_01517_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2018_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2023_01_018 crossref_primary_10_1089_omi_2023_0015 crossref_primary_10_1039_D0AY00627K crossref_primary_10_1186_s12935_025_03756_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lfs_2020_117774 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41417_023_00657_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms231911022 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000021420 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09201_3 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1728_5673 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2019_2916632 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_976854 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ebiom_2022_104340 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33490 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16064 crossref_primary_10_4236_jbm_2025_133021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_019_00222_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_15619_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e23167 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2018_04_026 crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_15545 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2021_03_004 crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2019_170 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2022_06_032 crossref_primary_10_14216_kjco_18013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cellsig_2025_111741 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_073925 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_1093324 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers11091244 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_06_039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10565_024_09920_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_3462 crossref_primary_10_7189_jogh_12_11014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2024_02_008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2023_1184754 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2021_713895 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtbi_2019_109996 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_13413_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_025_01762_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_20_31288_5 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0040_1714307 crossref_primary_10_5230_jgc_2022_22_e22 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/ajr.12064 10.1080/00365520802085395 10.1093/jjco/hyn017 10.1111/jgh.12387 10.1093/jjco/hyq091 10.1002/ijc.21664 10.1371/journal.pone.0050041 10.1371/journal.pone.0079088 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.025 10.1007/PL00011735 10.1002/ijc.29210 10.1038/bjc.1994.216 10.1159/000326857 10.1093/jjco/hyn026 10.1007/s12664-013-0378-2 10.1038/bjc.2014.608 10.4143/crt.2015.066 10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5672 10.1002/ijc.2910600106 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.016 10.1006/pmed.1999.0507 10.1023/A:1022596104796 10.1002/cncr.10646 10.1097/MD.0000000000000533 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328318ed42 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2018 by the Korean Cancer Association 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.4143/crt.2017.048 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2005-9256 |
EndPage | 589 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3151054 PMC5912132 28602053 10_4143_crt_2017_048 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 29B 5-W 53G 8JR 9ZL AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ACYCR ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. F5P HYE OK1 RPM TR2 C1A M~E NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-f722bcd7c23a0453dc22f44932f0bca83be7e73de8c6f26de83abd495c068cbf3 |
ISSN | 1598-2998 2005-9256 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:55:05 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:30:48 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:59:06 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:43:19 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:18:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastroscopy Mortality Stomach neoplasms Cohort studies |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c484t-f722bcd7c23a0453dc22f44932f0bca83be7e73de8c6f26de83abd495c068cbf3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5912132 |
PMID | 28602053 |
PQID | 1908797891 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_3151054 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5912132 proquest_miscellaneous_1908797891 pubmed_primary_28602053 crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2017_048 crossref_citationtrail_10_4143_crt_2017_048 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2018 text: 2018-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Cancer research and treatment |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cancer Res Treat |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Korean Cancer Association 대한암학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Cancer Association – name: 대한암학회 |
References | (ref5) 2015 ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref20 ref22 Oh (ref27) 2011 ref21 ref28 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 Tashiro (ref25) 2006 ref4 ref3 ref6 Yoo (ref10) 2002 |
References_xml | – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1111/ajr.12064 – start-page: 4873 volume-title: Comparing mass screening techniques for gastric cancer in Japan year: 2006 ident: ref25 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1080/00365520802085395 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn017 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1111/jgh.12387 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq091 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1002/ijc.21664 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050041 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079088 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.025 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1007/PL00011735 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210 – start-page: 85 volume-title: Korean multi-center cancer cohort study including a biological materials bank (KMCC-I) year: 2002 ident: ref10 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.216 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1159/000326857 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn026 – start-page: 277 volume-title: Quality control of upper gastrointestinal seriese (UGIS) by the Image Quality Evaluation Table of Korea and Japan year: 2011 ident: ref27 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/s12664-013-0378-2 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.608 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.066 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5672 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910600106 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.016 – volume-title: Cancer Facts & Figures 2015 [Internet] year: 2015 ident: ref5 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0507 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1023/A:1022596104796 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1002/cncr.10646 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000533 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328318ed42 |
SSID | ssj0064371 |
Score | 2.3847969 |
Snippet | This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the Korean... Purpose This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of gastric cancer (GC) screening methods in a community-based prospective cohort of the... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 582 |
SubjectTerms | Original 의약학 |
Title | Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Screening on Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Community-Based Prospective Cohort |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28602053 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1908797891 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5912132 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002335606 |
Volume | 50 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 50(2), , pp.582-589 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdYJyFeEN-ULxkET1VG63zYflzHSkHbeGml8mQljsNCNweVVtPgn-ccO19VkQYvSWVHdpXf5Xxn3_0Oobc0TjkhCfdkKDk4KEHkJSPpmyjzMCRDSrkyG_qnZ9F0HnxehIvmuKDMLlknB_LXzryS_0EV2gBXkyX7D8jWg0ID_AZ84QoIw_VGGFvq4Upfgdn3MTZlOOTgyGC5gg_XRNWUcc16uw8Ug60nakMtSivcWOS5HsQDlzayvvbGsMqV6QRVSib0nRfdHX03ouMNsqlydQB7c8h_aZc5ddWc_E-v3Hb1143-njcHVLZxWiyvN25lLekAXPRwrja6vVsxYq0gl1KplcynnISO_npHm9PKlo7WSR9pqdjQFivaVv0BGH6Al1yZANkRPRhaAs8uw_bZFzGZn5yI2fFitof2CbgWpIf2D8cfxpNq_TYnmcZNr_-VTZcw479vj94xZPb0Ktvlo2yH2rZsl9k9dNc5HfjQStB9dEvpB-j2qQureIh-dwQJFxl2woIttLgWJFzo7b5akDDgjmtBwrnGMd4SJNwSJGwF6RGaT45nR1PPVeXwZMCCtZfBO0tkSiXxY_AH_FQSkgUB-AHZMJEx8xNFFfVTxWSUkQjufpyk4IfLYcRkkvmPUU8XWj1FmPFwmMUhg4UjDhJGWRRkPOIyBCM9VSTqo0H1ioV0lPWmcsqFANfVACIAEGEAEQBIH72rn_5hqVr-8twbQEssZS4Mt7q5fyvEciXAg_wk_JFxOYI-el2BKUDhmlO0WKti81OABc0op4yP-uiJBbeejpiKbrCs9RHtwF4_YCbs9uj8vCR1D7khVyTPbjDvc3Sn-bReoN56tVEvwTReJ6-cLP8B-Fq-0g |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+Gastric+Cancer+Screening+on+Gastric+Cancer+Incidence+and+Mortality+in+a+Community-Based+Prospective+Cohort&rft.jtitle=Cancer+research+and+treatment&rft.au=Kim%2C+Heewon&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Yunji&rft.au=Sung%2C+Hokyung&rft.au=Jang%2C+Jieun&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.issn=2005-9256&rft.eissn=2005-9256&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=582&rft_id=info:doi/10.4143%2Fcrt.2017.048&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |