What is the Accuracy of a Rapid Strip Test That Detects D-lactic Acid in Synovial Fluid for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections?
D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid i...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical orthopaedics and related research Vol. 481; no. 1; pp. 120 - 129 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wolters Kluwer
01.01.2023
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0009-921X 1528-1132 1528-1132 |
DOI | 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002328 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.
(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?
This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).
The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).
A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.Questions/purposes(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuickTM, BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).ResultsThe best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).ConclusionA rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.BACKGROUNDD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?QUESTIONS/PURPOSES(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).METHODSThis prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).RESULTSThe best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.CONCLUSIONA rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI. (1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests? This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria). The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%). A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. |
Author | Kowalczewski, Jacek Grajek, Aleksandra Grzelecki, Dariusz Walczak, Piotr |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland – name: Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland – name: Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dariusz surname: Grzelecki fullname: Grzelecki, Dariusz organization: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland – sequence: 2 givenname: Aleksandra surname: Grajek fullname: Grajek, Aleksandra organization: Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland – sequence: 3 givenname: Piotr surname: Walczak fullname: Walczak, Piotr organization: Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland – sequence: 4 givenname: Jacek surname: Kowalczewski fullname: Kowalczewski, Jacek organization: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkl1vFCEUhompsdvqT9CQeOPNVD6G-YiJptm1WtOkZrtG7wjDQJfKwgpMm_0R_c9luq2peyM35HCe9-VwOAdgz3mnAHiN0RFGbf1-ej6fH6Eni1DSPAMTzEhTYEzJHpjk07ZoCf61Dw5ivMohLRl5AfYpa8sS1WQCbn8uRYImwrRU8FjKIQi5gV5DAedibXp4kYJZw4WKCS5GdKaSkinCWWGFTEZmUaaMgxcb56-NsPDEDvlE-3DvOTPi0vmYb8im31U2Cz7mxCj95o1L8NTp7Gi8i59eguda2KhePeyH4MfJ58X0a3F2_uV0enxWyLIpcdHSXgvWadFSzWqGcSNxU8m-7zDutKK6QxIjTWpVkZ5K0nS1qmstyo5gpStND8HHre966Faql8qlICxfB7MSYcO9MPzfjDNLfumveVszVFU4G7x7MAj-z5Cbw1cmSmWtcMoPkZMaoaqkpKYZfbuDXvkhuPy8TDHGGlw2babePK3obymPP5WBD1tA5v7FoDSXJomxbblAYzlGfJwLPs4F352LrGY76scL_qcrt7obb5MK8bcdblTgSyVsWt7jFDVVQTKNcI6KUYjpHdqJy8A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_23_00225 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002393 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_24_00230 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_23_00252 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00264-020-04889-z 10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0104.R3 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0103.R2 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.05.015 10.1007/s00167-018-4904-8 10.1186/s13018-021-02778-8 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0953.R1 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.051 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001609 10.1007/s00467-017-3844-8 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.015 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.018 10.1155/2020/3419034 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.016 10.1302/2046-3758.95.BJR-2019-0213.R1 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022 10.1007/s11999-014-3828-y 10.12659/MSM.899368 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000336 10.1007/s10096-019-03587-y 10.3928/01477447-20180102-03 10.1002/jor.24766 10.1186/s12891-021-04282-w 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1 10.1002/jor.24897 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Wolters Kluwer Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Wolters Kluwer – notice: Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. – notice: 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons – notice: 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7T5 H94 K9. NAPCQ 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002328 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Immunology Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Immunology Abstracts Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1528-1132 |
EndPage | 129 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC9750661 35944072 10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328 00003086-202301000-00021 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 203 29B 29~ 2J2 2KG 2KM 2LR 2WC 30V 4.4 408 40D 40E 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 67Z 6J9 6NX 6PF 78A 7O~ 7RV 7X7 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAAV AABHQ AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJKR AAMOA AAQKA AARTL AASCR AASXQ AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABASU ABDIG ABHLI ABJNI ABJOX ABMNI ABNWP ABPLI ABPPZ ABPXF ABUWZ ABVCZ ABZZY ACGFO ACGFS ACGUR ACHVE ACHXU ACIHN ACILI ACKNC ACLDA ACNWC ACOAL ACPRK ACREN ACXJB ACZKN ADBBV ADGGA ADHIR ADHPY ADKPE AEAQA AEGNC AEJHL AENEX AETLH AFBBN AFBFQ AFDTB AFJLC AFWTZ AFZKB AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHMBA AHOMT AHQNM AHYZX AIIXL AINUH AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJRNO AJZMW AKCTQ AKMHD AKULP ALIPV ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX ALWAN AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOIJS AOQMC ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN B-. BA0 BAWUL BQLVK BYPQX C45 CS3 DIK DIWNM E3Z EBS EEVPB ERAAH ESBYG EX3 F5P FCALG FRRFC FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGRSB GNXGY GQDEL GX1 H0~ HF~ HG5 HLICF HLJTE HMJXF HRMNR HYE HZ~ IKREB IKYAY ITM IXC IZQ I~X I~Z J0Z JBSCW JK3 JK8 KMI KOV KPH L7B MA- N9A O9- O93 O9I OAG OAH OB4 ODA OK1 OL1 OLB OLG OLH OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH OVD OVDNE OVIDH OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P2P P9S PF0 PONUX Q2X QOS R89 R9I RLZ RPM RPX RRX RSV S16 S27 S37 S3B S4R SAP SDH SHX SMD SOJ SZ9 SZN T13 TEORI TR2 TSK TSPGW TT1 TUC TWZ U2A U9L UG4 VC2 VVN W48 WAF WH7 WK8 WOW X3V X3W XXN XYM YFH YOC YQY Z45 ZB8 ZFV ZOVNA -Y2 .55 .GJ 08G 1CY 1KJ 2JY 354 3O- 88E 8AO 8F7 8FI 8FJ AAEJM AAFWJ AAIAL AAJJC AANXM AAQQT AAYXX AAYZH ABFSG ABTEG ABTMW ABUWG ACBXY ACSTC ADBIZ ADFPA ADGHP ADIYS ADNKB ADQRH AE3 AEBTG AEETU AEOHA AEPYU AEZWR AFFNX AFHIU AFKRA AFLOW AFUWQ AGJBK AHAVH AHRYX AHSBF AHVBC AHWEU AI. AIXLP AJBLW AJJEV AMKLP BENPR BGNMA BKEYQ BPHCQ BS7 BVXVI CAG CCPQU CITATION COF CSCUP DUNZO EJD FEDTE FYUFA H13 HMCUK HVGLF H~9 J5H JF9 JG8 K8S M18 M1P M4Y NAPCQ NU0 N~M OCUKA ORVUJ OUVQU P-K PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO R58 RIG ROL S1Z T8P UKHRP VH1 WOQ X7M YRY ZCG ZGI ZXP ZZMQN CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7T5 ADSXY H94 K9. 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-93dfa5bfa93f575118c186cddb11bfe3fb0c10f27e62d3c28b7e77fa4b21ef6f3 |
ISSN | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:37:00 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:46:31 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 06:25:46 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:53:44 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:54:17 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 03:49:09 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4841-93dfa5bfa93f575118c186cddb11bfe3fb0c10f27e62d3c28b7e77fa4b21ef6f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1812-7061 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9750661 |
PMID | 35944072 |
PQID | 2755581489 |
PQPubID | 54045 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9750661 proquest_miscellaneous_2700643273 proquest_journals_2755581489 pubmed_primary_35944072 crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328 wolterskluwer_health_00003086-202301000-00021 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-January-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2023 text: 2023-January-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Park Ridge – name: Philadelphia, PA |
PublicationTitle | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Orthop Relat Res |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wolters Kluwer – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
References | Li (R15-20250508) 2018; 41 Sigmund (R22-20250508) 2021; 45 Fang (R6-20250508) 2021; 10 Wang (R27-20250508) 2017; 23 de Saint Vincent (R5-20250508) 2018; 104 Trotter (R26-20250508) 2020; 9 Sayan (R20-20250508) 2021; 9 Sigmund (R23-20250508) 2018; 476 Li (R16-20250508) 2021; 16 Grzelecki (R9-20250508) 2021; 103 Suen (R24-20250508) 2018; 100 Parvizi (R18-20250508) 2018; 33 Blanc (R3-20250508) 2019; 38 McNally (R17-20250508) 2021; 103 Grzelecki (R8-20250508) 2021; 39 Bianchetti (R2-20250508) 2018; 33 Li (R14-20250508) 2018; 33 Gratacos (R7-20250508) 1995; 22 Karbysheva (R11-20250508) 2020; 35 Janz (R10-20250508) 2018; 7 Yermak (R28-20250508) 2019; 79 Kelly (R12-20250508) 2021; 36 Chen (R4-20250508) 2021; 22 Sharma (R21-20250508) 2020; 38 Pohanka (R19-20250508) 2020; 2020 Ahmad (R1-20250508) 2018; 26 Kurtz (R13-20250508) 2012; 27 Zheng (R29-20250508) 2021; 479 Tetreault (R25-20250508) 2014; 472 36214769 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):130-131 |
References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 837 year: 2021 ident: R22-20250508 article-title: Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections publication-title: Int Orthop doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04889-z – volume: 10 start-page: 96 year: 2021 ident: R6-20250508 article-title: Effects of different tissue specimen pretreatment methods on microbial culture results in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: Bone Joint Res doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0104.R3 – volume: 7 start-page: 12 year: 2018 ident: R10-20250508 article-title: Rapid detection of periprosthetic joint infection using a combination of 16s rDNA polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow immunoassay: a pilot study publication-title: Bone Joint Res doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0103.R2 – volume: 79 start-page: 123 year: 2019 ident: R28-20250508 article-title: Performance of synovial fluid D-lactate for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective observational study publication-title: J Infect doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.05.015 – volume: 26 start-page: 3039 year: 2018 ident: R1-20250508 article-title: A meta-analysis of synovial biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection: synovasure is less effective than the ELISA-based alpha-defensin test publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4904-8 – volume: 16 start-page: 606 year: 2021 ident: R16-20250508 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid D-lactate for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02778-8 – volume: 103 start-page: 18 year: 2021 ident: R17-20250508 article-title: The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: Bone Joint J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1 – volume: 103 start-page: 46 year: 2021 ident: R9-20250508 article-title: Blood and synovial fluid calprotectin as biomarkers to diagnose chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections publication-title: Bone Joint J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0953.R1 – volume: 36 start-page: 2137 year: 2021 ident: R12-20250508 article-title: The utility of frozen section histology in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in revision total joint arthroplasty publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.051 – volume: 479 start-page: 1323 year: 2021 ident: R29-20250508 article-title: What is the optimal timing for reading the leukocyte esterase strip for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection? publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001609 – volume: 33 start-page: 673 year: 2018 ident: R2-20250508 article-title: D-lactic acidosis in humans: systematic literature review publication-title: Pediatr Nephrol doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3844-8 – volume: 33 start-page: 1309 year: 2018 ident: R18-20250508 article-title: The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078 – volume: 33 start-page: 2981 year: 2018 ident: R14-20250508 article-title: Centrifugation may change the results of leukocyte rsterase strip testing in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.015 – volume: 104 start-page: 427 year: 2018 ident: R5-20250508 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of the alpha defensin lateral flow device (Synovasure) for periprosthetic infections in microbiologically complex situations: a study of 42 cases in a French referral centre publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.018 – volume: 2020 start-page: 3419034 year: 2020 ident: R19-20250508 article-title: D-lactic acid as a metabolite: toxicology, diagnosis, and detection publication-title: Biomed Res Int doi: 10.1155/2020/3419034 – volume: 35 start-page: 2223 year: 2020 ident: R11-20250508 article-title: Synovial fluid d-lactate-a novel pathogen-specific biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.016 – volume: 22 start-page: 1504 year: 1995 ident: R7-20250508 article-title: D-lactic acid in synovial fluid. A rapid diagnostic test for bacterial synovitis publication-title: J Rheumatol – volume: 9 start-page: 202 year: 2020 ident: R26-20250508 article-title: Preliminary evaluation of a rapid lateral flow calprotectin test for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection publication-title: Bone Joint Res doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.95.BJR-2019-0213.R1 – volume: 27 start-page: 61 year: 2012 ident: R13-20250508 article-title: Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022 – volume: 472 start-page: 3997 year: 2014 ident: R25-20250508 article-title: Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection? publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3828-y – volume: 23 start-page: 353 year: 2017 ident: R27-20250508 article-title: Leukocyte esterase as a biomarker in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.899368 – volume: 476 start-page: 1645 year: 2018 ident: R23-20250508 article-title: Is the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay more accurate than the lateral flow alpha defensin test for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection? publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000336 – volume: 38 start-page: 1625 year: 2019 ident: R3-20250508 article-title: The use of labelled leucocyte scintigraphy to evaluate chronic periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective multicentre study on 168 patients publication-title: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03587-y – volume: 41 start-page: e189 year: 2018 ident: R15-20250508 article-title: Leukocyte esterase strip test: a rapid and reliable method for the diagnosis of infections in arthroplasty publication-title: Orthopedics doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180102-03 – volume: 38 start-page: 2664 year: 2020 ident: R21-20250508 article-title: Comparative analysis of 23 synovial fluid biomarkers for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection detection publication-title: J Orthop Res doi: 10.1002/jor.24766 – volume: 22 start-page: 422 year: 2021 ident: R4-20250508 article-title: Different diagnostic performance of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score matched study publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04282-w – volume: 9 start-page: 33 year: 2021 ident: R20-20250508 article-title: The expanding role of biomarkers in diagnosing infection in total joint arthroplasty: a review of current literature publication-title: Arch Bone Jt Surg – volume: 100 start-page: 66 year: 2018 ident: R24-20250508 article-title: Synovasure 'quick test' is not as accurate as the laboratory-based alpha-defensin immunoassay: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Bone Joint J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1 – volume: 39 start-page: 291 year: 2021 ident: R8-20250508 article-title: Elevated plasma D-dimer concentration has higher efficacy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection of the knee than of the hip-a single-center, retrospective study publication-title: J Orthop Res doi: 10.1002/jor.24897 – reference: 36214769 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):130-131 |
SSID | ssj0003452 |
Score | 2.4355426 |
Snippet | D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate... BackgroundD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 120 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Acids Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis Biomarkers - analysis Bone implants Clinical Research Comorbidity Diagnosis Diagnostic tests Humans Inflammatory diseases Joint diseases Lactic Acid Medical diagnosis Prospective Studies Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Synovial fluid Synovial Fluid - chemistry |
Title | What is the Accuracy of a Rapid Strip Test That Detects D-lactic Acid in Synovial Fluid for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections? |
URI | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00003086-202301000-00021 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944072 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755581489 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700643273 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9750661 |
Volume | 481 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fb9MwELfKeEFCCMS_wkBG4q3KqBOnSZ4QWldNZdqm0kp9i5zE1rJWSdWmTPQ78Gn4gtw5TtrQSgz6kEZ24ri9X8539v3OhHxUnuomypEWE4FvcTeQViRcbgWJl_QAHzCk6GiLy975hA-n7rTV-rUTtbQuopN4c5BX8j9ShTKQK7Jk_0GydaNQAOcgXziChOF4Lxlj3m3ckVzTQ-J4vcS92zXhcSQWKVqSoBI6Y1D8nTFe2peFDt7oW3PNjYKbUsy91Pn2I8u_49z5YL6Gkir0sF_G4ZUpS67hFy2QI3KDvMfOME-zAtRLGcsF1ngzQvC0YlziuhA45rgeVKaD1uwZid87E2k6AmiDe_LMDPN9ma5Xm22duJUzQ8iZraCZ5XY4EfN4I3TldZoXdbDx1_wOa0CJl00ORWwSE5tJDtvZmeQwetkGZ5eZqVB5oMwoc-6zPdSWqplp0t3-kGFSEV-NRmUuS_MBS9PfjpFVXMDlVTiYXFyE47Pp-AF5aINvwqopIjP8O1xv81T3rqKNBd6ngw9pGkR7Xs5-sO7juxwDKVYzzaPYsYbGT8kT48bQLyUmn5GWzJ6Tn4hHmq4oQIRWeKS5ooJqPFKNR4p4pIhHavBIKzxSxCNNM1rhkWo8UsCjbrPGIzbaxCPVeKRbPH5-QSaDs_HpuWW2-7Bi7nNmBU6ihBspETgKVwOZHzO_FydJxFikpKOibsy6yvZkz06c2PYjT3qeEjyymVQ95bwkR1meydeE-gFLujBy2i63eSI8YbtSoaWq_MgXSdAmvPrPw9jkwsctWeZhFZOBogr_FFWbnNS3LcpkMH-74bgSaGj0xiq0Pcyxx7gP3fhQV4NWx6U6kcl8jddoXwF8izZ5Vcq_fqLjBhzTGraJ10BGfQFmjG_WZOmNzhwfgH8ABnmbWA0MhSXnWnff6fo9C1_BLq78YdIJm725Rz_fkkfbF_eYHBXLtXwH9noRvdfvx2_EDeqI |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What+is+the+Accuracy+of+a+Rapid+Strip+Test+That+Detects+D-lactic+Acid+in+Synovial+Fluid+for+the+Diagnosis+of+Periprosthetic+Joint+Infections%3F&rft.jtitle=Clinical+orthopaedics+and+related+research&rft.au=Grzelecki%2C+Dariusz&rft.au=Grajek%2C+Aleksandra&rft.au=Walczak%2C+Piotr&rft.au=Kowalczewski%2C+Jacek&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issn=1528-1132&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.volume=481&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FCORR.0000000000002328&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |