What is the Accuracy of a Rapid Strip Test That Detects D-lactic Acid in Synovial Fluid for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections?

D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical orthopaedics and related research Vol. 481; no. 1; pp. 120 - 129
Main Authors Grzelecki, Dariusz, Grajek, Aleksandra, Walczak, Piotr, Kowalczewski, Jacek
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer 01.01.2023
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0009-921X
1528-1132
1528-1132
DOI10.1097/CORR.0000000000002328

Cover

Loading…
Abstract D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI. (1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests? This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria). The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%). A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.
AbstractList BackgroundD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.Questions/purposes(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuickTM, BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).ResultsThe best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).ConclusionA rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.
D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.BACKGROUNDD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?QUESTIONS/PURPOSES(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).METHODSThis prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).RESULTSThe best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.CONCLUSIONA rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.
D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI. (1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests? This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [+++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria). The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%). A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.
Author Kowalczewski, Jacek
Grajek, Aleksandra
Grzelecki, Dariusz
Walczak, Piotr
AuthorAffiliation Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
– name: Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
– name: Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dariusz
  surname: Grzelecki
  fullname: Grzelecki, Dariusz
  organization: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Aleksandra
  surname: Grajek
  fullname: Grajek, Aleksandra
  organization: Central Laboratory of Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Piotr
  surname: Walczak
  fullname: Walczak, Piotr
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jacek
  surname: Kowalczewski
  fullname: Kowalczewski, Jacek
  organization: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumoorthopedics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Prof. Adam Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkl1vFCEUhompsdvqT9CQeOPNVD6G-YiJptm1WtOkZrtG7wjDQJfKwgpMm_0R_c9luq2peyM35HCe9-VwOAdgz3mnAHiN0RFGbf1-ej6fH6Eni1DSPAMTzEhTYEzJHpjk07ZoCf61Dw5ivMohLRl5AfYpa8sS1WQCbn8uRYImwrRU8FjKIQi5gV5DAedibXp4kYJZw4WKCS5GdKaSkinCWWGFTEZmUaaMgxcb56-NsPDEDvlE-3DvOTPi0vmYb8im31U2Cz7mxCj95o1L8NTp7Gi8i59eguda2KhePeyH4MfJ58X0a3F2_uV0enxWyLIpcdHSXgvWadFSzWqGcSNxU8m-7zDutKK6QxIjTWpVkZ5K0nS1qmstyo5gpStND8HHre966Faql8qlICxfB7MSYcO9MPzfjDNLfumveVszVFU4G7x7MAj-z5Cbw1cmSmWtcMoPkZMaoaqkpKYZfbuDXvkhuPy8TDHGGlw2babePK3obymPP5WBD1tA5v7FoDSXJomxbblAYzlGfJwLPs4F352LrGY76scL_qcrt7obb5MK8bcdblTgSyVsWt7jFDVVQTKNcI6KUYjpHdqJy8A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_23_00225
crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002393
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_24_00230
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_23_00252
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00264-020-04889-z
10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0104.R3
10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0103.R2
10.1016/j.jinf.2019.05.015
10.1007/s00167-018-4904-8
10.1186/s13018-021-02778-8
10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1
10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0953.R1
10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.051
10.1097/CORR.0000000000001609
10.1007/s00467-017-3844-8
10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078
10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.015
10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.018
10.1155/2020/3419034
10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.016
10.1302/2046-3758.95.BJR-2019-0213.R1
10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022
10.1007/s11999-014-3828-y
10.12659/MSM.899368
10.1097/CORR.0000000000000336
10.1007/s10096-019-03587-y
10.3928/01477447-20180102-03
10.1002/jor.24766
10.1186/s12891-021-04282-w
10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1
10.1002/jor.24897
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Wolters Kluwer
Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons
2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: Wolters Kluwer
– notice: Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
– notice: 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons
– notice: 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7T5
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002328
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Immunology Abstracts
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1528-1132
EndPage 129
ExternalDocumentID PMC9750661
35944072
10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328
00003086-202301000-00021
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
29B
29~
2J2
2KG
2KM
2LR
2WC
30V
4.4
408
40D
40E
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
67Z
6J9
6NX
6PF
78A
7O~
7RV
7X7
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAAV
AABHQ
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJKR
AAMOA
AAQKA
AARTL
AASCR
AASXQ
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABASU
ABDIG
ABHLI
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABMNI
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABPPZ
ABPXF
ABUWZ
ABVCZ
ABZZY
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGUR
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACILI
ACKNC
ACLDA
ACNWC
ACOAL
ACPRK
ACREN
ACXJB
ACZKN
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHIR
ADHPY
ADKPE
AEAQA
AEGNC
AEJHL
AENEX
AETLH
AFBBN
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFJLC
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHMBA
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHYZX
AIIXL
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJRNO
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKMHD
AKULP
ALIPV
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
ALWAN
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOIJS
AOQMC
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BQLVK
BYPQX
C45
CS3
DIK
DIWNM
E3Z
EBS
EEVPB
ERAAH
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FRRFC
FWDCC
G-Y
G-Z
GGRSB
GNXGY
GQDEL
GX1
H0~
HF~
HG5
HLICF
HLJTE
HMJXF
HRMNR
HYE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
ITM
IXC
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J0Z
JBSCW
JK3
JK8
KMI
KOV
KPH
L7B
MA-
N9A
O9-
O93
O9I
OAG
OAH
OB4
ODA
OK1
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
P9S
PF0
PONUX
Q2X
QOS
R89
R9I
RLZ
RPM
RPX
RRX
RSV
S16
S27
S37
S3B
S4R
SAP
SDH
SHX
SMD
SOJ
SZ9
SZN
T13
TEORI
TR2
TSK
TSPGW
TT1
TUC
TWZ
U2A
U9L
UG4
VC2
VVN
W48
WAF
WH7
WK8
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
YQY
Z45
ZB8
ZFV
ZOVNA
-Y2
.55
.GJ
08G
1CY
1KJ
2JY
354
3O-
88E
8AO
8F7
8FI
8FJ
AAEJM
AAFWJ
AAIAL
AAJJC
AANXM
AAQQT
AAYXX
AAYZH
ABFSG
ABTEG
ABTMW
ABUWG
ACBXY
ACSTC
ADBIZ
ADFPA
ADGHP
ADIYS
ADNKB
ADQRH
AE3
AEBTG
AEETU
AEOHA
AEPYU
AEZWR
AFFNX
AFHIU
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFUWQ
AGJBK
AHAVH
AHRYX
AHSBF
AHVBC
AHWEU
AI.
AIXLP
AJBLW
AJJEV
AMKLP
BENPR
BGNMA
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BS7
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
CITATION
COF
CSCUP
DUNZO
EJD
FEDTE
FYUFA
H13
HMCUK
HVGLF
H~9
J5H
JF9
JG8
K8S
M18
M1P
M4Y
NAPCQ
NU0
N~M
OCUKA
ORVUJ
OUVQU
P-K
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
R58
RIG
ROL
S1Z
T8P
UKHRP
VH1
WOQ
X7M
YRY
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
ZZMQN
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7T5
ADSXY
H94
K9.
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4841-93dfa5bfa93f575118c186cddb11bfe3fb0c10f27e62d3c28b7e77fa4b21ef6f3
ISSN 0009-921X
1528-1132
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:37:00 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:46:31 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 06:25:46 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:53:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:54:17 EDT 2025
Fri May 16 03:49:09 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4841-93dfa5bfa93f575118c186cddb11bfe3fb0c10f27e62d3c28b7e77fa4b21ef6f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1812-7061
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9750661
PMID 35944072
PQID 2755581489
PQPubID 54045
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9750661
proquest_miscellaneous_2700643273
proquest_journals_2755581489
pubmed_primary_35944072
crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328
crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002328
wolterskluwer_health_00003086-202301000-00021
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-January-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-January-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Park Ridge
– name: Philadelphia, PA
PublicationTitle Clinical orthopaedics and related research
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Orthop Relat Res
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Publisher_xml – name: Wolters Kluwer
– name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
References Li (R15-20250508) 2018; 41
Sigmund (R22-20250508) 2021; 45
Fang (R6-20250508) 2021; 10
Wang (R27-20250508) 2017; 23
de Saint Vincent (R5-20250508) 2018; 104
Trotter (R26-20250508) 2020; 9
Sayan (R20-20250508) 2021; 9
Sigmund (R23-20250508) 2018; 476
Li (R16-20250508) 2021; 16
Grzelecki (R9-20250508) 2021; 103
Suen (R24-20250508) 2018; 100
Parvizi (R18-20250508) 2018; 33
Blanc (R3-20250508) 2019; 38
McNally (R17-20250508) 2021; 103
Grzelecki (R8-20250508) 2021; 39
Bianchetti (R2-20250508) 2018; 33
Li (R14-20250508) 2018; 33
Gratacos (R7-20250508) 1995; 22
Karbysheva (R11-20250508) 2020; 35
Janz (R10-20250508) 2018; 7
Yermak (R28-20250508) 2019; 79
Kelly (R12-20250508) 2021; 36
Chen (R4-20250508) 2021; 22
Sharma (R21-20250508) 2020; 38
Pohanka (R19-20250508) 2020; 2020
Ahmad (R1-20250508) 2018; 26
Kurtz (R13-20250508) 2012; 27
Zheng (R29-20250508) 2021; 479
Tetreault (R25-20250508) 2014; 472
36214769 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):130-131
References_xml – volume: 45
  start-page: 837
  year: 2021
  ident: R22-20250508
  article-title: Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04889-z
– volume: 10
  start-page: 96
  year: 2021
  ident: R6-20250508
  article-title: Effects of different tissue specimen pretreatment methods on microbial culture results in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: Bone Joint Res
  doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0104.R3
– volume: 7
  start-page: 12
  year: 2018
  ident: R10-20250508
  article-title: Rapid detection of periprosthetic joint infection using a combination of 16s rDNA polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow immunoassay: a pilot study
  publication-title: Bone Joint Res
  doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0103.R2
– volume: 79
  start-page: 123
  year: 2019
  ident: R28-20250508
  article-title: Performance of synovial fluid D-lactate for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective observational study
  publication-title: J Infect
  doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.05.015
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3039
  year: 2018
  ident: R1-20250508
  article-title: A meta-analysis of synovial biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection: synovasure is less effective than the ELISA-based alpha-defensin test
  publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4904-8
– volume: 16
  start-page: 606
  year: 2021
  ident: R16-20250508
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid D-lactate for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02778-8
– volume: 103
  start-page: 18
  year: 2021
  ident: R17-20250508
  article-title: The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1
– volume: 103
  start-page: 46
  year: 2021
  ident: R9-20250508
  article-title: Blood and synovial fluid calprotectin as biomarkers to diagnose chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0953.R1
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2137
  year: 2021
  ident: R12-20250508
  article-title: The utility of frozen section histology in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in revision total joint arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.051
– volume: 479
  start-page: 1323
  year: 2021
  ident: R29-20250508
  article-title: What is the optimal timing for reading the leukocyte esterase strip for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001609
– volume: 33
  start-page: 673
  year: 2018
  ident: R2-20250508
  article-title: D-lactic acidosis in humans: systematic literature review
  publication-title: Pediatr Nephrol
  doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3844-8
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1309
  year: 2018
  ident: R18-20250508
  article-title: The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2981
  year: 2018
  ident: R14-20250508
  article-title: Centrifugation may change the results of leukocyte rsterase strip testing in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.015
– volume: 104
  start-page: 427
  year: 2018
  ident: R5-20250508
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of the alpha defensin lateral flow device (Synovasure) for periprosthetic infections in microbiologically complex situations: a study of 42 cases in a French referral centre
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.018
– volume: 2020
  start-page: 3419034
  year: 2020
  ident: R19-20250508
  article-title: D-lactic acid as a metabolite: toxicology, diagnosis, and detection
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
  doi: 10.1155/2020/3419034
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2223
  year: 2020
  ident: R11-20250508
  article-title: Synovial fluid d-lactate-a novel pathogen-specific biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.016
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1504
  year: 1995
  ident: R7-20250508
  article-title: D-lactic acid in synovial fluid. A rapid diagnostic test for bacterial synovitis
  publication-title: J Rheumatol
– volume: 9
  start-page: 202
  year: 2020
  ident: R26-20250508
  article-title: Preliminary evaluation of a rapid lateral flow calprotectin test for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: Bone Joint Res
  doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.95.BJR-2019-0213.R1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 61
  year: 2012
  ident: R13-20250508
  article-title: Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022
– volume: 472
  start-page: 3997
  year: 2014
  ident: R25-20250508
  article-title: Is synovial C-reactive protein a useful marker for periprosthetic joint infection?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3828-y
– volume: 23
  start-page: 353
  year: 2017
  ident: R27-20250508
  article-title: Leukocyte esterase as a biomarker in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.899368
– volume: 476
  start-page: 1645
  year: 2018
  ident: R23-20250508
  article-title: Is the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay more accurate than the lateral flow alpha defensin test for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000336
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1625
  year: 2019
  ident: R3-20250508
  article-title: The use of labelled leucocyte scintigraphy to evaluate chronic periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective multicentre study on 168 patients
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03587-y
– volume: 41
  start-page: e189
  year: 2018
  ident: R15-20250508
  article-title: Leukocyte esterase strip test: a rapid and reliable method for the diagnosis of infections in arthroplasty
  publication-title: Orthopedics
  doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180102-03
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2664
  year: 2020
  ident: R21-20250508
  article-title: Comparative analysis of 23 synovial fluid biomarkers for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection detection
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.24766
– volume: 22
  start-page: 422
  year: 2021
  ident: R4-20250508
  article-title: Different diagnostic performance of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score matched study
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04282-w
– volume: 9
  start-page: 33
  year: 2021
  ident: R20-20250508
  article-title: The expanding role of biomarkers in diagnosing infection in total joint arthroplasty: a review of current literature
  publication-title: Arch Bone Jt Surg
– volume: 100
  start-page: 66
  year: 2018
  ident: R24-20250508
  article-title: Synovasure 'quick test' is not as accurate as the laboratory-based alpha-defensin immunoassay: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1
– volume: 39
  start-page: 291
  year: 2021
  ident: R8-20250508
  article-title: Elevated plasma D-dimer concentration has higher efficacy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection of the knee than of the hip-a single-center, retrospective study
  publication-title: J Orthop Res
  doi: 10.1002/jor.24897
– reference: 36214769 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):130-131
SSID ssj0003452
Score 2.4355426
Snippet D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate...
BackgroundD-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wolterskluwer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 120
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Acids
Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis
Biomarkers - analysis
Bone implants
Clinical Research
Comorbidity
Diagnosis
Diagnostic tests
Humans
Inflammatory diseases
Joint diseases
Lactic Acid
Medical diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Synovial fluid
Synovial Fluid - chemistry
Title What is the Accuracy of a Rapid Strip Test That Detects D-lactic Acid in Synovial Fluid for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections?
URI https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00003086-202301000-00021
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944072
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755581489
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700643273
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9750661
Volume 481
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fb9MwELfKeEFCCMS_wkBG4q3KqBOnSZ4QWldNZdqm0kp9i5zE1rJWSdWmTPQ78Gn4gtw5TtrQSgz6kEZ24ri9X8539v3OhHxUnuomypEWE4FvcTeQViRcbgWJl_QAHzCk6GiLy975hA-n7rTV-rUTtbQuopN4c5BX8j9ShTKQK7Jk_0GydaNQAOcgXziChOF4Lxlj3m3ckVzTQ-J4vcS92zXhcSQWKVqSoBI6Y1D8nTFe2peFDt7oW3PNjYKbUsy91Pn2I8u_49z5YL6Gkir0sF_G4ZUpS67hFy2QI3KDvMfOME-zAtRLGcsF1ngzQvC0YlziuhA45rgeVKaD1uwZid87E2k6AmiDe_LMDPN9ma5Xm22duJUzQ8iZraCZ5XY4EfN4I3TldZoXdbDx1_wOa0CJl00ORWwSE5tJDtvZmeQwetkGZ5eZqVB5oMwoc-6zPdSWqplp0t3-kGFSEV-NRmUuS_MBS9PfjpFVXMDlVTiYXFyE47Pp-AF5aINvwqopIjP8O1xv81T3rqKNBd6ngw9pGkR7Xs5-sO7juxwDKVYzzaPYsYbGT8kT48bQLyUmn5GWzJ6Tn4hHmq4oQIRWeKS5ooJqPFKNR4p4pIhHavBIKzxSxCNNM1rhkWo8UsCjbrPGIzbaxCPVeKRbPH5-QSaDs_HpuWW2-7Bi7nNmBU6ihBspETgKVwOZHzO_FydJxFikpKOibsy6yvZkz06c2PYjT3qeEjyymVQ95bwkR1meydeE-gFLujBy2i63eSI8YbtSoaWq_MgXSdAmvPrPw9jkwsctWeZhFZOBogr_FFWbnNS3LcpkMH-74bgSaGj0xiq0Pcyxx7gP3fhQV4NWx6U6kcl8jddoXwF8izZ5Vcq_fqLjBhzTGraJ10BGfQFmjG_WZOmNzhwfgH8ABnmbWA0MhSXnWnff6fo9C1_BLq78YdIJm725Rz_fkkfbF_eYHBXLtXwH9noRvdfvx2_EDeqI
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What+is+the+Accuracy+of+a+Rapid+Strip+Test+That+Detects+D-lactic+Acid+in+Synovial+Fluid+for+the+Diagnosis+of+Periprosthetic+Joint+Infections%3F&rft.jtitle=Clinical+orthopaedics+and+related+research&rft.au=Grzelecki%2C+Dariusz&rft.au=Grajek%2C+Aleksandra&rft.au=Walczak%2C+Piotr&rft.au=Kowalczewski%2C+Jacek&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issn=1528-1132&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.volume=481&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FCORR.0000000000002328&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon