Vascular calcification and cardiovascular function in chronic kidney disease

Background. Vascular calcification and arterial stiffening are independent predictors of all causes and cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Few data are currently available comparing vascular calcification and its attendant functional cardiovascular consequences between CKD sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 707 - 714
Main Authors Sigrist, Mhairi, Bungay, Peter, Taal, Maarter W., McIntyre, Christopher W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.03.2006
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Vascular calcification and arterial stiffening are independent predictors of all causes and cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Few data are currently available comparing vascular calcification and its attendant functional cardiovascular consequences between CKD stage 4 patients and both peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) (CKD stage 5) patients. Method. We studied 134 subjects (60 HD, 28 PD and 46 CKD 4). Vascular calcification was quantified using multi-slice spiral CT scanning of a 5 cm standardized segment of superficial femoral artery. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity were assessed using applanation tonometry, to determine arterial compliance. Further digital arterial pulse wave analysis was used to measure systemic haemodynamic variables. All medications were recorded and biochemical variables were time averaged for the 6 months prior to entering the study. Results. Forty-seven percent of CKD 4 patients demonstrated vascular calcification as compared with CKD 5 (71% PD and 73% HD, P = 0.02). HD patients had higher calcification scores (median 121) than either PD (median 21) or CKD 4 (median 0) (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Comparing tertiles of patients (based on calcification score), increased calcification score was associated with a reduction in arterial compliance (mean PWV 8.9±1.1, 11±3.6, 11.3±3.7 m/s, P = 0.005). The degree of calcification did not influence systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP or heart rate. However, more heavily calcified patients demonstrated significantly higher mean pulse pressures (58±19, 74±22 and 72±25 mmHg, P = 0.001), lower total peripheral resistance (1.5±1, 1.3±0.8, 0.9±0.4, P = 0.01) and higher stroke volume (84±25, 95±29, 106±39 ml, P = 0.01). More heavily calcified patients were significantly older and predominantly male. Conclusion. This study has successfully utilized a novel technique for the quantification of calcification. We have demonstrated vascular calcification and associated cardiovascular dysfunction in CKD 4, PD and HD with significant differences between the groups. Thirty percent of individuals show no calcification, even those established on renal replacement therapy for a prolonged period of time. Further work is required to identify factors which promote progression of arterial calcification in those who are susceptible.
Bibliography:Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr C. W. McIntyre, Department of Renal Medicine, Derby City General Hospital, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK. Email: Chris.McIntyre@derbyhospitals.nhs.uk
ark:/67375/HXZ-C2QN9L1D-7
local:gfi236
istex:52033ED4385933F016676C03B8135B16B3C09E27
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfi236