New Perspectives on Eye Development and the Evolution of Eyes and Photoreceptors

Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, neces...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of heredity Vol. 96; no. 3; pp. 171 - 184
Main Author Gehring, W. J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.05.2005
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.
AbstractList Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.
Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.
Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion. In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author Gehring, W. J
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Gehring, W. J
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15653558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALFdFt4cgVIg7cQsdx_JEj2i4tUgVb0SLExfI6EzZLNk5tZ2n_fROygFQJ9TQHP_Z45j0iB61rkZCXFN5RKNjJZo0eyxMMNWTyCZnRXPBUMsYOyAwgy1LKgR2SoxA2AEB5Ac_IIeWCM87VjCw_4a9kiT50aGO9w5C4NlncYXKKO2xct8U2JqYtk7jGZLFzTR_rQbhqROH3yXLtovNosRtKeE6eVqYJ-GJfj8n1h8XV_Dy9-Hz2cf7-IrW5ojFVJZeQwwoMZEKCqYQqbFEWzHJeSSmNZaLCLKdlRVFSakuecb4aBuBYUiPYMXk7vdt5d9NjiHpbB4tNY1p0fdBC8ozxXD0KcyEYlcAfhVQqKiAf4ZsHcON63w7TalooULmk4_9e7VG_2mKpO19vjb_Tf1Y_gHQC1rsQPFb_COgxWj1Fq6doB88eeFtHM6YRvamb_97ad6lDxNu_LYz_OWyISa7Pv33X869nl_npFejLwb-efGWcNj98HfT1lwwoAygKQVXB7gEjN8Do
CODEN JOHEA8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0077_0
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0703349104
crossref_primary_10_1002_dneu_22739
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2009_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00439_018_1948_2
crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2009_0083
crossref_primary_10_1134_S003103011012004X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2010_05_494
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1525_142X_2007_00217_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2023_1136602
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu7085299
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1525_142X_2011_00528_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_nn_2155
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_07_005
crossref_primary_10_3389_finsc_2023_1327005
crossref_primary_10_5928_kaiyou_25_4_123
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0952523813000035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2024_105293
crossref_primary_10_1002_dvdy_22380
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_60452013000200003
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1420_9101_2008_01564_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00412_015_0543_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tem_2007_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1242_bio_060445
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_1001904
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejop_2008_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2007_12_037
crossref_primary_10_1111_php_13999
crossref_primary_10_1159_000348282
crossref_primary_10_1038_nature14593
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asd_2006_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1039_C1IB00115A
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11172636
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0036420
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13072_019_0272_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0076_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_encyclopedia4010003
crossref_primary_10_1096_fj_11_186767
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0914609107
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41065_019_0113_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2005_08_046
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755691016000232
crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_028308
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11302_011_9273_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2008_07_076
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00114_009_0607_9
crossref_primary_10_1134_S0006297924060014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_011_0643_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gene_2006_03_025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11625_024_01479_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_dvdy_22764
crossref_primary_10_2108_zsj_25_699
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_010_0515_2
crossref_primary_10_3928_01913913_20161017_01
crossref_primary_10_1002_wdev_96
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_genom_010622_095109
crossref_primary_10_1093_icb_icp053
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_11_S1_S59
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11692_009_9059_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jff_2024_106100
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_08_039
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_011_0377_9
crossref_primary_10_1210_en_2008_0882
crossref_primary_10_31857_S0320972524060012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2018_07_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00427_007_0147_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00335_008_9136_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_4159_2008_05765_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbrc_2008_08_045
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bone_2017_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbrc_2009_05_034
crossref_primary_10_1038_nature07891
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_hdy_6800793
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0172719
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_014_0350_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2006_02_078
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12010061
crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2014_949004
crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_134254
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00435_008_0075_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2011_07829_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2008_11_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_ede_12331
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0168579
crossref_primary_10_1002_dvg_22019
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0749_2006_00318_x
crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msaa296
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2009_05_565
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1550_7408_2009_00420_x
crossref_primary_10_1242_dmm_022012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10126_024_10396_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2017_00613
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_11222
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2005_08_036
crossref_primary_10_1186_1749_8104_4_32
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics11091196
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11063_018_9954_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00418_011_0828_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_213X_10_35
crossref_primary_10_1111_jpy_12525
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00294_008_0224_8
crossref_primary_10_3732_ajb_0800038
crossref_primary_10_1093_icb_icw037
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_4159_2009_06184_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2019_11_042
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11064_016_2156_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_11_731
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2005_12_041
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology12060890
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92242
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_2004979
crossref_primary_10_1093_mp_sss137
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcmm_12260
crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_200900175
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology9080196
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0087_y
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1000901107
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2009_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2014_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbpb_2007_03_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gde_2005_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evr061
crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_20733
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_602796
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gep_2011_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1005268
crossref_primary_10_4003_006_026_0208
crossref_primary_10_1128_EC_00118_08
Cites_doi 10.1126/science.7892602
10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003731
10.1073/pnas.022626999
10.1073/pnas.94.10.5156
10.1086/279455
10.1073/pnas.0630561100
10.1016/0092-8674(89)90956-2
10.1002/jez.b.38
10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00286-0
10.1073/pnas.2335980100
10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00325-3
10.1242/dev.113.4.1435
10.1242/dev.129.3.625
10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343
10.1038/46463
10.1098/rspb.2003.2504
10.1073/pnas.31.6.153
10.1242/dev.01278
10.1242/dev.126.10.2253
10.1007/s004270000110
10.1126/science.860134
10.1073/pnas.97.9.4475
10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02170.x
10.1007/978-3-642-61958-8
10.1073/pnas.97.9.4525
10.1038/354522a0
10.1038/42475
10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01776-X
10.1126/science.7914031
10.1093/dnares/8.5.205
10.1073/pnas.96.2.564
10.1006/dbio.1998.9170
10.1242/dev.129.4.1015
10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80457-8
10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.018
10.1016/0092-8674(91)90284-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Oxford University Press(England) May 2005
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Oxford University Press(England) May 2005
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QG
7SN
7SS
7TK
8FD
C1K
FR3
K9.
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
7X8
DOI 10.1093/jhered/esi027
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Genetics Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
Biology
EISSN 1465-7333
EndPage 184
ExternalDocumentID 821700831
15653558
10_1093_jhered_esi027
ark_67375_HXZ_CVGQ4DT0_Q
US201300996189
Genre Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-E4
-~X
.2P
.55
.I3
0R~
0WA
186
18M
1KJ
1TH
29K
2KS
2WC
3O-
4.4
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6.Y
70D
79B
85S
9M8
AABJS
AABMN
AAESY
AAIMJ
AAIYJ
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMDB
AAMVS
AANRK
AAOGV
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAVLN
AAWDT
AAYJJ
ABEUO
ABGFU
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABNKS
ABPPZ
ABPTD
ABPTK
ABQLI
ABQTQ
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABWST
ABXZS
ABZBJ
ACBTR
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACKOT
ACNCT
ACPQN
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ADBBV
ADEIU
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADFTL
ADGKP
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADOCK
ADORX
ADQLU
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYKR
ADYVW
ADZTZ
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEGXH
AEHKS
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AELWJ
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AEQTP
AETBJ
AETEA
AEWNT
AFDAS
AFFDN
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFHKK
AFIYH
AFMIJ
AFOFC
AFRAH
AFSWV
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGNAY
AGQXC
AGSYK
AHMBA
AHXPO
AIAGR
AIDAL
AIJHB
AIKOY
AJEEA
AKHUL
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
ANFBD
APIBT
APJGH
APWMN
AQDSO
ARIXL
ASAOO
ASPBG
ATDFG
ATTQO
AVWKF
AXUDD
AYOIW
AZFZN
AZQFJ
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BKOMP
BQDIO
BSWAC
BYORX
CAG
CASEJ
CDBKE
COF
CQJDY
CS3
CXTWN
CZ4
D-I
D0L
DAKXR
DFGAJ
DIK
DILTD
DPORF
DPPUQ
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EJD
ELUNK
EMOBN
F20
F5P
F9B
FA8
FBQ
FEDTE
FHSFR
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FQBLK
G8K
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
H~9
IOX
J21
KAQDR
KBUDW
KC5
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
M49
MBTAY
ML0
MVM
N9A
NEJ
NGC
NHB
NLBLG
NOMLY
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAWHX
OBOKY
ODMLO
OHT
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OMK
OVD
OWPYF
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
QZG
R44
RD5
RIG
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
RZO
S10
TAE
TCN
TEORI
TLC
TN5
TR2
TWZ
UBC
UHB
UKR
UPT
UQL
VQA
W8F
WH7
WHG
WOQ
X7H
X7M
XJT
XOL
XSW
Y6R
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YQI
YQJ
YQT
YROCO
YSK
YXANX
YYQ
YZZ
ZCA
ZGI
ZHY
ZKB
ZKX
ZUP
ZXP
~02
~91
~KM
AAILS
AARHZ
AAUAY
ABDFA
ABDPE
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABIME
ABMNT
ABNGD
ABPIB
ABPQP
ABVGC
ABXVV
ABZEO
ACSIT
ACUKT
ACVCV
ACZBC
ADCFL
ADNBA
ADQBN
ADXHL
AEHUL
AFSHK
AGMDO
AGORE
AGQPQ
AHGBF
AJBYB
AJDVS
AJNCP
ATGXG
BSCLL
H13
JXSIZ
YR5
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
YIN
7QG
7SN
7SS
7TK
8FD
C1K
FR3
K9.
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8d57040b0a02670af689c9d93c55f777ac36fe241df1e711cd5255b0155ed1a63
ISSN 0022-1503
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 11:16:28 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:26:55 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:59:16 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:49:34 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:42:31 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:04:31 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:09 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 16:50:18 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 27 19:14:29 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c481t-8d57040b0a02670af689c9d93c55f777ac36fe241df1e711cd5255b0155ed1a63
Notes Address correspondence to Walter Gehring at the address above, or e-mail: walter.gehring@unibas.ch
istex:4D2733F42326B5739D3E58FD59B4C108CA9E4A04
ark:/67375/HXZ-CVGQ4DT0-Q
local:esi027
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article-pdf/96/3/171/6454848/esi027.pdf
PMID 15653558
PQID 198084716
PQPubID 42032
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67523548
proquest_miscellaneous_46631705
proquest_miscellaneous_17816045
proquest_journals_198084716
pubmed_primary_15653558
crossref_primary_10_1093_jhered_esi027
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jhered_esi027
istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_CVGQ4DT0_Q
fao_agris_US201300996189
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle The Journal of heredity
PublicationTitleAlternate J Hered
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Oxford University Press
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
– name: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
References key 20171011120634_BIB10
key 20171011120634_BIB32
key 20171011120634_BIB31
key 20171011120634_BIB30
key 20171011120634_BIB18
key 20171011120634_BIB17
key 20171011120634_BIB39
key 20171011120634_BIB16
key 20171011120634_BIB38
key 20171011120634_BIB15
key 20171011120634_BIB37
key 20171011120634_BIB14
key 20171011120634_BIB36
key 20171011120634_BIB13
key 20171011120634_BIB35
key 20171011120634_BIB12
key 20171011120634_BIB34
key 20171011120634_BIB11
key 20171011120634_BIB33
key 20171011120634_BIB19
key 20171011120634_BIB21
key 20171011120634_BIB20
key 20171011120634_BIB42
key 20171011120634_BIB41
key 20171011120634_BIB40
key 20171011120634_BIB9
key 20171011120634_BIB8
key 20171011120634_BIB29
key 20171011120634_BIB28
key 20171011120634_BIB27
key 20171011120634_BIB26
key 20171011120634_BIB25
key 20171011120634_BIB24
key 20171011120634_BIB23
key 20171011120634_BIB22
key 20171011120634_BIB5
key 20171011120634_BIB4
key 20171011120634_BIB7
key 20171011120634_BIB6
key 20171011120634_BIB1
key 20171011120634_BIB3
key 20171011120634_BIB2
References_xml – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB11
  doi: 10.1126/science.7892602
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB40
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003731
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB3
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB30
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.022626999
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB39
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5156
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB15
  doi: 10.1086/279455
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB25
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630561100
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB31
  doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90956-2
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB33
  doi: 10.1002/jez.b.38
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB10
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00286-0
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB6
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.2335980100
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB21
  doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00325-3
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB13
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB42
  doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB34
  doi: 10.1242/dev.129.3.625
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB4
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB1
  doi: 10.1038/46463
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB28
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2504
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB8
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB17
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.31.6.153
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB35
  doi: 10.1242/dev.01278
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB27
  doi: 10.1242/dev.126.10.2253
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB16
  doi: 10.1007/s004270000110
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB18
  doi: 10.1126/science.860134
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB26
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4475
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB29
  doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02170.x
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB7
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61958-8
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB32
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4525
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB14
  doi: 10.1038/354522a0
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB37
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB23
  doi: 10.1038/42475
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB5
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01776-X
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB36
  doi: 10.1126/science.7914031
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB20
  doi: 10.1093/dnares/8.5.205
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB12
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.564
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB19
  doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9170
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB22
  doi: 10.1242/dev.129.4.1015
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB2
  doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80457-8
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB9
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB38
  doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.018
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB41
  doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90284-6
– ident: key 20171011120634_BIB24
SSID ssj0001590
Score 2.178495
Snippet Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
istex
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 171
SubjectTerms adults
Algae
Animals
Brain - embryology
Brain - metabolism
cell differentiation
chloroplasts
Cyanobacteria
Evolution, Molecular
Evolutionary biology
Eye - embryology
Eye - metabolism
Eye - ultrastructure
Eye Proteins - genetics
eyes
Eyes & eyesight
gene duplication
Gene expression
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
Genetics, Population
Homeodomain Proteins - genetics
humans
Hydrozoa
insects
Metazoa
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Miozoa
Models, Genetic
monophyly
Paired Box Transcription Factors - genetics
PAX6 Transcription Factor
Photoreception
Photoreceptor Cells - cytology
Photoreceptor Cells - metabolism
Photoreceptor Cells - ultrastructure
photoreceptors
photosensitivity
photosynthesis
polyphyly
protists
regulatory sequences
Repressor Proteins - genetics
Rhodophyta
rhodopsin
structural genes
symbionts
Symbiosis
transcription factors
Tripedalia
Title New Perspectives on Eye Development and the Evolution of Eyes and Photoreceptors
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-CVGQ4DT0-Q/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15653558
https://www.proquest.com/docview/198084716
https://www.proquest.com/docview/17816045
https://www.proquest.com/docview/46631705
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67523548
Volume 96
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagCAkOCMqjoTxyQJwIjTeJ4xyrsmWBUrYiC6terDxstgUlaDdFLL-emdh5CRYBlyiKR07sGU9m7JlvCHkSpnmQcj9zcvi7OD6TkZPmrnQk3GWURSpVmI389phNZv7reTDvqqLW2SVV-jz78du8kv_hKjwDvmKW7D9wtu0UHsA98BeuwGG4_hWPMThx2mVL1jv_4_UgEqiNkBx_M59SxxKupcZmni5KcLolxraU5lznvJOfnrW6wJqeZ1UX-ykXS1MO5aM5Wmr2DoIuUq-fk9jb8DJZVWjdmiIizYZEF_sPJqRWSVKrTJ8FTuhpOItGp-oqtUZ2vJ6CpLrgyi-KW4NandeDQV6uzlyNGTCEyD5-Jw5nR0ciHs_jYWv9S-YjhBvkmFd_ZQR-Q-1jv3rT_prBdnMb-HgchgFdhZfv6Vfv6RcPjJTLKinBdcFV932zH1LbI_FNcsOwxt7XUnGLXJLFNrm-_2lpwFTkNrmqC42ub5MpSIrdlxS7LGwQArsnKTawwQZJsVtJsUuFRKu6ZSgpd8jscBwfTBxTS8PJfE4rh-dBCPo6dRMsOeYmivEoi_LIy4JAhWGYZB5TEsy5XFEZUprlATibKVrUMqcJ8-6SraIs5A6xMxXmSiqmPCp9P1dAxFjKmRvh9hhNLPKsmTyRGaB5rHfyReiAB0_ouRZ6ri3ytCX_qhFWNhHuACdEAhO5ErP3IzxzB_-GUR5BHzV72g6S5WeMWAwDMZmfioMPL0_8F7ErTiyy2_BPmIW8EjTiLhppzCKP21bQsnh0lhSyvACSkFMG3s9mCh9Md4Sm2kwBrvnIC3xukXtacLrhgleFZQ7u__Hrdsm1bg0_IFvV8kI-BIu4Sh_VUv4T-Sq4QA
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New+Perspectives+on+Eye+Development+and+the+Evolution+of+Eyes+and+Photoreceptors&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+heredity&rft.au=Gehring%2C+W+J&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.pub=Oxford+Publishing+Limited+%28England%29&rft.issn=0022-1503&rft.eissn=1465-7333&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjhered%2Fesi027&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=821700831
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon