New Perspectives on Eye Development and the Evolution of Eyes and Photoreceptors
Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, neces...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of heredity Vol. 96; no. 3; pp. 171 - 184 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Oxford University Press
01.05.2005
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations. Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion.In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations. Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted expression of one and the same master control gene, that is, Pax6 can induce the formation of ectopic eyes in both insects and vertebrates, necessitates a reconsideration of the dogma of a polyphyletic origin of the various eye types in all the animal phyla. The involvement of Pax6 and six1 and six3 genes, which encode highly conserved transcription factors, in the genetic control of eye development in organisms ranging from planarians to humans argues strongly for a monophyletic origin of the eye. Because transcription factors can control the expression of any target gene provided it contains the appropriate gene regulatory elements, the conservation of the genetic control of eye development by Pax6 among all bilaterian animals is not due to functional constraints but a consequence of its evolutionary history. The prototypic eyes postulated by Darwin to consist of two cells only, a photoreceptor and a pigment cell, were accidentally controlled by Pax6 and the subsequent evolution of the various eye types occurred by building onto this original genetic program. A hypothesis of intercalary evolution is proposed that assumes that the eye morphogenetic pathway is progressively modified by intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top of the hierarchy and the structural genes like rhodopsin at the bottom. The recruitment of novel genes into the eye morphogenetic pathway can be due to at least two different genetic mechanisms, gene duplication and enhancer fusion. In tracing back the evolution of eyes beyond bilaterians, we find highly developed eyes in some box-jellyfish as well as in some Hydrozoans. In Hydrozoans the same orthologous six genes (six1 and six3) are required for eye regeneration as in planarians, and in the box jellyfish Tripedalia a pax B gene, which may be a precursor of Pax6, was found to be expressed in the eyes. In contrast to the adults, which have highly evolved eyes, the Planula larva of Tripedalia has single- celled photoreceptors similar to some unicellular protists. For the origin of photoreceptor cells in metazoa, I propose two hypotheses, one based on cellular differentiation and a more speculative one based on symbiosis. The former assumes that photoreceptor cells originated from a colonial protist in which all the cells were photosensitive and subsequent cellular differentiation to give rise to photoreceptor cells. The symbiont hypothesis, which I call the Russian doll model, assumes that photosensitivity arose first in photosynthetic cyanobacteria that were subsequently taken up into red algae as primary chloroplasts. The red algae in turn were taken up by dinoflagellates as secondary chloroplasts and in some species evolved into the most sophisticated eye organelles, as found, for example, in some dinoflagellates like Erythropsis and Warnovia, which lack chloroplasts. Because dinoflagellates are commonly found as symbionts in cnidarians, the dinoflagellates may have transferred their photoreceptor genes to cnidarians. In cnidarians such as Tripedalia the step from photoreceptor organelles to multicellular eyes has occurred. These two hypotheses, the cellular differentiation and the symbiont hypothesis, are not mutually exclusive and are the subject of further investigations.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
Author | Gehring, W. J |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Gehring, W. J |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15653558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALFdFt4cgVIg7cQsdx_JEj2i4tUgVb0SLExfI6EzZLNk5tZ2n_fROygFQJ9TQHP_Z45j0iB61rkZCXFN5RKNjJZo0eyxMMNWTyCZnRXPBUMsYOyAwgy1LKgR2SoxA2AEB5Ac_IIeWCM87VjCw_4a9kiT50aGO9w5C4NlncYXKKO2xct8U2JqYtk7jGZLFzTR_rQbhqROH3yXLtovNosRtKeE6eVqYJ-GJfj8n1h8XV_Dy9-Hz2cf7-IrW5ojFVJZeQwwoMZEKCqYQqbFEWzHJeSSmNZaLCLKdlRVFSakuecb4aBuBYUiPYMXk7vdt5d9NjiHpbB4tNY1p0fdBC8ozxXD0KcyEYlcAfhVQqKiAf4ZsHcON63w7TalooULmk4_9e7VG_2mKpO19vjb_Tf1Y_gHQC1rsQPFb_COgxWj1Fq6doB88eeFtHM6YRvamb_97ad6lDxNu_LYz_OWyISa7Pv33X869nl_npFejLwb-efGWcNj98HfT1lwwoAygKQVXB7gEjN8Do |
CODEN | JOHEA8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0077_0 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0703349104 crossref_primary_10_1002_dneu_22739 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2009_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00439_018_1948_2 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2009_0083 crossref_primary_10_1134_S003103011012004X crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2010_05_494 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1525_142X_2007_00217_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2023_1136602 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu7085299 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1525_142X_2011_00528_x crossref_primary_10_1038_nn_2155 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_07_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_finsc_2023_1327005 crossref_primary_10_5928_kaiyou_25_4_123 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0952523813000035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2024_105293 crossref_primary_10_1002_dvdy_22380 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_60452013000200003 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1420_9101_2008_01564_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00412_015_0543_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tem_2007_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1242_bio_060445 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_1001904 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejop_2008_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2007_12_037 crossref_primary_10_1111_php_13999 crossref_primary_10_1159_000348282 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature14593 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asd_2006_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1039_C1IB00115A crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11172636 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0036420 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13072_019_0272_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0076_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_encyclopedia4010003 crossref_primary_10_1096_fj_11_186767 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0914609107 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41065_019_0113_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2005_08_046 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755691016000232 crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_028308 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11302_011_9273_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2008_07_076 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00114_009_0607_9 crossref_primary_10_1134_S0006297924060014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00438_011_0643_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gene_2006_03_025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11625_024_01479_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_dvdy_22764 crossref_primary_10_2108_zsj_25_699 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_010_0515_2 crossref_primary_10_3928_01913913_20161017_01 crossref_primary_10_1002_wdev_96 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_genom_010622_095109 crossref_primary_10_1093_icb_icp053 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2105_11_S1_S59 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11692_009_9059_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jff_2024_106100 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_08_039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_011_0377_9 crossref_primary_10_1210_en_2008_0882 crossref_primary_10_31857_S0320972524060012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2018_07_017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00427_007_0147_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00335_008_9136_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_4159_2008_05765_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbrc_2008_08_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bone_2017_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbrc_2009_05_034 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature07891 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_hdy_6800793 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0172719 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_014_0350_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2006_02_078 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12010061 crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2014_949004 crossref_primary_10_1242_dev_134254 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00435_008_0075_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2011_07829_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2008_11_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_ede_12331 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0168579 crossref_primary_10_1002_dvg_22019 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0749_2006_00318_x crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msaa296 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2009_05_565 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1550_7408_2009_00420_x crossref_primary_10_1242_dmm_022012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10126_024_10396_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2017_00613 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_11222 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2005_08_036 crossref_primary_10_1186_1749_8104_4_32 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics11091196 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11063_018_9954_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00418_011_0828_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2006_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_213X_10_35 crossref_primary_10_1111_jpy_12525 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00294_008_0224_8 crossref_primary_10_3732_ajb_0800038 crossref_primary_10_1093_icb_icw037 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_4159_2009_06184_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2019_11_042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11064_016_2156_x crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_11_731 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2005_12_041 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology12060890 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_92242 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_2004979 crossref_primary_10_1093_mp_sss137 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcmm_12260 crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_200900175 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology9080196 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12052_008_0087_y crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1000901107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preteyeres_2009_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ydbio_2014_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbpb_2007_03_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gde_2005_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evr061 crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_20733 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_602796 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gep_2011_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1005268 crossref_primary_10_4003_006_026_0208 crossref_primary_10_1128_EC_00118_08 |
Cites_doi | 10.1126/science.7892602 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003731 10.1073/pnas.022626999 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5156 10.1086/279455 10.1073/pnas.0630561100 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90956-2 10.1002/jez.b.38 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00286-0 10.1073/pnas.2335980100 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00325-3 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435 10.1242/dev.129.3.625 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343 10.1038/46463 10.1098/rspb.2003.2504 10.1073/pnas.31.6.153 10.1242/dev.01278 10.1242/dev.126.10.2253 10.1007/s004270000110 10.1126/science.860134 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4475 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02170.x 10.1007/978-3-642-61958-8 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4525 10.1038/354522a0 10.1038/42475 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01776-X 10.1126/science.7914031 10.1093/dnares/8.5.205 10.1073/pnas.96.2.564 10.1006/dbio.1998.9170 10.1242/dev.129.4.1015 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80457-8 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.018 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90284-6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Oxford University Press(England) May 2005 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Oxford University Press(England) May 2005 |
DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 7TK 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/jhered/esi027 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Neurosciences Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Genetics Abstracts Entomology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture Biology |
EISSN | 1465-7333 |
EndPage | 184 |
ExternalDocumentID | 821700831 15653558 10_1093_jhered_esi027 ark_67375_HXZ_CVGQ4DT0_Q US201300996189 |
Genre | Journal Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -E4 -~X .2P .55 .I3 0R~ 0WA 186 18M 1KJ 1TH 29K 2KS 2WC 3O- 4.4 482 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WA 5WD 6.Y 70D 79B 85S 9M8 AABJS AABMN AAESY AAIMJ AAIYJ AAJKP AAJQQ AAMDB AAMVS AANRK AAOGV AAPQZ AAPXW AAUQX AAVAP AAVLN AAWDT AAYJJ ABEUO ABGFU ABIXL ABJNI ABLJU ABNKS ABPPZ ABPTD ABPTK ABQLI ABQTQ ABSAR ABSMQ ABWST ABXZS ABZBJ ACBTR ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACKOT ACNCT ACPQN ACPRK ACUFI ACUTJ ADBBV ADEIU ADEYI ADEZT ADFTL ADGKP ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADOCK ADORX ADQLU ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYKR ADYVW ADZTZ ADZXQ AEGPL AEGXH AEHKS AEJOX AEKPW AEKSI AELWJ AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AEQTP AETBJ AETEA AEWNT AFDAS AFFDN AFFZL AFGWE AFHKK AFIYH AFMIJ AFOFC AFRAH AFSWV AFXEN AFYAG AGINJ AGKEF AGKRT AGNAY AGQXC AGSYK AHMBA AHXPO AIAGR AIDAL AIJHB AIKOY AJEEA AKHUL AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ALXQX ANFBD APIBT APJGH APWMN AQDSO ARIXL ASAOO ASPBG ATDFG ATTQO AVWKF AXUDD AYOIW AZFZN AZQFJ BAWUL BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BKOMP BQDIO BSWAC BYORX CAG CASEJ CDBKE COF CQJDY CS3 CXTWN CZ4 D-I D0L DAKXR DFGAJ DIK DILTD DPORF DPPUQ DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EE~ EJD ELUNK EMOBN F20 F5P F9B FA8 FBQ FEDTE FHSFR FLUFQ FOEOM FQBLK G8K GAUVT GJXCC GX1 H5~ HAR HVGLF HW0 HZ~ H~9 IOX J21 KAQDR KBUDW KC5 KOP KQ8 KSI KSN L7B M-Z M49 MBTAY ML0 MVM N9A NEJ NGC NHB NLBLG NOMLY NTWIH NU- NVLIB O0~ O9- OAWHX OBOKY ODMLO OHT OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OMK OVD OWPYF O~Y P2P PAFKI PB- PEELM PQQKQ Q1. Q5Y QBD QZG R44 RD5 RIG RNI ROL ROX ROZ RUSNO RW1 RXO RZF RZO S10 TAE TCN TEORI TLC TN5 TR2 TWZ UBC UHB UKR UPT UQL VQA W8F WH7 WHG WOQ X7H X7M XJT XOL XSW Y6R YAYTL YKOAZ YQI YQJ YQT YROCO YSK YXANX YYQ YZZ ZCA ZGI ZHY ZKB ZKX ZUP ZXP ~02 ~91 ~KM AAILS AARHZ AAUAY ABDFA ABDPE ABEJV ABGNP ABIME ABMNT ABNGD ABPIB ABPQP ABVGC ABXVV ABZEO ACSIT ACUKT ACVCV ACZBC ADCFL ADNBA ADQBN ADXHL AEHUL AFSHK AGMDO AGORE AGQPQ AHGBF AJBYB AJDVS AJNCP ATGXG BSCLL H13 JXSIZ YR5 AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM YIN 7QG 7SN 7SS 7TK 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8d57040b0a02670af689c9d93c55f777ac36fe241df1e711cd5255b0155ed1a63 |
ISSN | 0022-1503 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:16:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:26:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:59:16 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:49:34 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:42:31 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:04:31 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:09 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 16:50:18 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:14:29 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c481t-8d57040b0a02670af689c9d93c55f777ac36fe241df1e711cd5255b0155ed1a63 |
Notes | Address correspondence to Walter Gehring at the address above, or e-mail: walter.gehring@unibas.ch istex:4D2733F42326B5739D3E58FD59B4C108CA9E4A04 ark:/67375/HXZ-CVGQ4DT0-Q local:esi027 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article-pdf/96/3/171/6454848/esi027.pdf |
PMID | 15653558 |
PQID | 198084716 |
PQPubID | 42032 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67523548 proquest_miscellaneous_46631705 proquest_miscellaneous_17816045 proquest_journals_198084716 pubmed_primary_15653558 crossref_primary_10_1093_jhered_esi027 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jhered_esi027 istex_primary_ark_67375_HXZ_CVGQ4DT0_Q fao_agris_US201300996189 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2005 text: 2005-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of heredity |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Hered |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press – name: Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
References | key 20171011120634_BIB10 key 20171011120634_BIB32 key 20171011120634_BIB31 key 20171011120634_BIB30 key 20171011120634_BIB18 key 20171011120634_BIB17 key 20171011120634_BIB39 key 20171011120634_BIB16 key 20171011120634_BIB38 key 20171011120634_BIB15 key 20171011120634_BIB37 key 20171011120634_BIB14 key 20171011120634_BIB36 key 20171011120634_BIB13 key 20171011120634_BIB35 key 20171011120634_BIB12 key 20171011120634_BIB34 key 20171011120634_BIB11 key 20171011120634_BIB33 key 20171011120634_BIB19 key 20171011120634_BIB21 key 20171011120634_BIB20 key 20171011120634_BIB42 key 20171011120634_BIB41 key 20171011120634_BIB40 key 20171011120634_BIB9 key 20171011120634_BIB8 key 20171011120634_BIB29 key 20171011120634_BIB28 key 20171011120634_BIB27 key 20171011120634_BIB26 key 20171011120634_BIB25 key 20171011120634_BIB24 key 20171011120634_BIB23 key 20171011120634_BIB22 key 20171011120634_BIB5 key 20171011120634_BIB4 key 20171011120634_BIB7 key 20171011120634_BIB6 key 20171011120634_BIB1 key 20171011120634_BIB3 key 20171011120634_BIB2 |
References_xml | – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB11 doi: 10.1126/science.7892602 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB40 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003731 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB3 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB30 doi: 10.1073/pnas.022626999 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB39 doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5156 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB15 doi: 10.1086/279455 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB25 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630561100 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB31 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90956-2 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB33 doi: 10.1002/jez.b.38 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB10 doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00286-0 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB6 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2335980100 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB21 doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00325-3 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB13 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB42 doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB34 doi: 10.1242/dev.129.3.625 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB4 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB1 doi: 10.1038/46463 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB28 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2504 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB8 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB17 doi: 10.1073/pnas.31.6.153 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB35 doi: 10.1242/dev.01278 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB27 doi: 10.1242/dev.126.10.2253 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB16 doi: 10.1007/s004270000110 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB18 doi: 10.1126/science.860134 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB26 doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4475 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB29 doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02170.x – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB7 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61958-8 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB32 doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4525 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB14 doi: 10.1038/354522a0 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB37 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB23 doi: 10.1038/42475 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB5 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01776-X – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB36 doi: 10.1126/science.7914031 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB20 doi: 10.1093/dnares/8.5.205 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB12 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.564 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB19 doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9170 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB22 doi: 10.1242/dev.129.4.1015 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB2 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80457-8 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB9 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB38 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.018 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB41 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90284-6 – ident: key 20171011120634_BIB24 |
SSID | ssj0001590 |
Score | 2.178495 |
Snippet | Recent experiments on the genetic control of eye development have opened up a completely new perspective on eye evolution. The demonstration that targeted... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref istex fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 171 |
SubjectTerms | adults Algae Animals Brain - embryology Brain - metabolism cell differentiation chloroplasts Cyanobacteria Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary biology Eye - embryology Eye - metabolism Eye - ultrastructure Eye Proteins - genetics eyes Eyes & eyesight gene duplication Gene expression Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental Genetics, Population Homeodomain Proteins - genetics humans Hydrozoa insects Metazoa Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Miozoa Models, Genetic monophyly Paired Box Transcription Factors - genetics PAX6 Transcription Factor Photoreception Photoreceptor Cells - cytology Photoreceptor Cells - metabolism Photoreceptor Cells - ultrastructure photoreceptors photosensitivity photosynthesis polyphyly protists regulatory sequences Repressor Proteins - genetics Rhodophyta rhodopsin structural genes symbionts Symbiosis transcription factors Tripedalia |
Title | New Perspectives on Eye Development and the Evolution of Eyes and Photoreceptors |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-CVGQ4DT0-Q/fulltext.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15653558 https://www.proquest.com/docview/198084716 https://www.proquest.com/docview/17816045 https://www.proquest.com/docview/46631705 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67523548 |
Volume | 96 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagCAkOCMqjoTxyQJwIjTeJ4xyrsmWBUrYiC6terDxstgUlaDdFLL-emdh5CRYBlyiKR07sGU9m7JlvCHkSpnmQcj9zcvi7OD6TkZPmrnQk3GWURSpVmI389phNZv7reTDvqqLW2SVV-jz78du8kv_hKjwDvmKW7D9wtu0UHsA98BeuwGG4_hWPMThx2mVL1jv_4_UgEqiNkBx_M59SxxKupcZmni5KcLolxraU5lznvJOfnrW6wJqeZ1UX-ykXS1MO5aM5Wmr2DoIuUq-fk9jb8DJZVWjdmiIizYZEF_sPJqRWSVKrTJ8FTuhpOItGp-oqtUZ2vJ6CpLrgyi-KW4NandeDQV6uzlyNGTCEyD5-Jw5nR0ciHs_jYWv9S-YjhBvkmFd_ZQR-Q-1jv3rT_prBdnMb-HgchgFdhZfv6Vfv6RcPjJTLKinBdcFV932zH1LbI_FNcsOwxt7XUnGLXJLFNrm-_2lpwFTkNrmqC42ub5MpSIrdlxS7LGwQArsnKTawwQZJsVtJsUuFRKu6ZSgpd8jscBwfTBxTS8PJfE4rh-dBCPo6dRMsOeYmivEoi_LIy4JAhWGYZB5TEsy5XFEZUprlATibKVrUMqcJ8-6SraIs5A6xMxXmSiqmPCp9P1dAxFjKmRvh9hhNLPKsmTyRGaB5rHfyReiAB0_ouRZ6ri3ytCX_qhFWNhHuACdEAhO5ErP3IzxzB_-GUR5BHzV72g6S5WeMWAwDMZmfioMPL0_8F7ErTiyy2_BPmIW8EjTiLhppzCKP21bQsnh0lhSyvACSkFMG3s9mCh9Md4Sm2kwBrvnIC3xukXtacLrhgleFZQ7u__Hrdsm1bg0_IFvV8kI-BIu4Sh_VUv4T-Sq4QA |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New+Perspectives+on+Eye+Development+and+the+Evolution+of+Eyes+and+Photoreceptors&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+heredity&rft.au=Gehring%2C+W+J&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.pub=Oxford+Publishing+Limited+%28England%29&rft.issn=0022-1503&rft.eissn=1465-7333&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjhered%2Fesi027&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=821700831 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-1503&client=summon |