Predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA) to identify 4–5 year-old children at risk of developmental delay in a low-risk sample

• Published in: Early human development Vol. 196; p. 106097
• Main Authors: Rosinda, Selena J., Hoekstra, Pieter J., Hadders-Algra, Mijna, de Bildt, Annelies, Heineman, Kirsten R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Advanced Basic Science; Early detection; Infants; Low-risk population; Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine; Neurodevelopmental disorders; Predictive validity; Screening; Screening; Infants; Neurodevelopmental disorders; Predictive validity; Early detection; Low-risk population
• ISSN: 0378-3782; 1872-6232; 1872-6232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106097

Early detection of developmental problems is important as it allows for early intervention. Previous studies, in high-risk infants, found high predictive values of atypical scores on the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA) for later neurodevelopmental disorders (i.e., cerebral palsy, intellectual disability). The present study explored SINDA's predictive values to identify risk of developmental delay at 4–5 years. Cohort study. 786 low-risk Dutch children (367 boys; median gestational age: 40 (27–42) weeks; mean birth weight: 3455 (SD 577) grams). The SINDA was assessed at 2–12 months and risk of developmental delay was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) at 4–5 years. SINDA's predictive values were determined for five ASQ domains and the total ASQ score for children at risk of marked (all ASQ domains deviant) and any (one or more ASQ domains deviant) developmental delay. Presence of one atypical SINDA scale score showed low to moderate sensitivities (12–88 %, depending on the SINDA scale and ASQ domain involved), moderate to high specificities (66–94 %), low positive predictive values (PPVs; 3–16 %), and high negative predictive values (NPVs; 95–100 %) for children at risk of marked and any developmental. Presence of multiple atypical SINDA scale scores predicted deviant ASQ domains slightly better (sensitivities = 11–62 %, specificities = 90–98 %, PPVs = 6–30 %, and NPVs = 95–100 %). In low-risk infants, SINDA's predictive value is low for detecting children at risk of marked and any developmental delay at 4–5 years, as reflected by the low sensitivities. One of the explanations is the relatively low prevalence of developmental delay in low-risk populations. This might have consequences for the application of the SINDA in general healthcare settings (e.g. child health clinics), but further studies are needed to draw this conclusion. •Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA) maps early development.•The value of the SINDA was now studied in a low-risk population.•The SINDA had high specificity but low sensitivity for later developmental delay.•The SINDA is not recommended as a screener in the general infant population.•The SINDA is useful in case of concerns about infants' behaviour.