Comparison of Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Versus without Active Cancer

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate post-procedural and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and active cancer. Between October 2013 and August 2015, a total of 749 patients undergoing TAVI using the Edwards Sapien XT pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of cardiology Vol. 118; no. 4; pp. 572 - 577
Main Authors Watanabe, Yusuke, MD, Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD, Hioki, Hirofumi, MD, Kawashima, Hideyuki, MD, Nara, Yugo, MD, Kataoka, Akihisa, MD, PhD, Shirai, Shinichi, MD, Tada, Norio, MD, Araki, Motoharu, MD, Takagi, Kensuke, MD, Yamanaka, Futoshi, MD, Yamamoto, Masanori, MD, PhD, Hayashida, Kentaro, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.08.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate post-procedural and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and active cancer. Between October 2013 and August 2015, a total of 749 patients undergoing TAVI using the Edwards Sapien XT prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA) were prospectively included in the OCEAN-TAVI registry from eight Japanese centers. A total of 47 patients (44.7% men; median age 83 years) had active cancer. The transfemoral approach was implemented in 85.1% of patients in the cancer group and 78.1% in the non-cancer group (p=0.22). The occurrence of major vascular complication (4.3% vs. 7.5%, p=0.24), life threatening bleeding (2.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.15), and major bleeding (8.5% vs. 13%, p=0.38) was similar between the cancer and non-cancer groups. No significant differences were observed regarding device success (100% vs. 96.2%, p=0.17) or 30-day survival (95.7% vs. 97.3%, p=0.38). No difference in midterm survival was found between the cancer patients and non-cancer patients (Log-rank, p=0.42), regardless of advanced or limited cancer (Log-rank, p=0.68). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, cancer metastasis was one of the most significant predictors of late mortality (hazard ratio: 4.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 20.0; p=0.035). In conclusion, cancer patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI had similar acute outcomes and midterm survival rates compared to non-cancer patients. Cancer metastasis was associated with increased mortality after TAVI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.052