Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams

Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConservation biology Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 943 - 955
Main Authors Stahl, Amanda T., Fremier, Alexander K., Cosens, Barbara A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Capacity
conectividad
Connecting
connectivity
Conservation
Contributed Paper
Contributed Papers
Coordination
corredores de fauna
Corridors
Environmental protection
Fauna
fragmentación del paisaje
Habitat connectivity
habitat conservation
Habitat corridors
Habitats
hábitat ribereño
issues and policy
Jurisdiction
Land ownership
Landscape
landscape fragmentation
landscapes
land‐use planning
law
ley
Mapping
Masking
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
planeación del uso de suelo
Policies
prioritization
private lands
protected areas
Restoration
riparian areas
riparian habitat
Rivers
Scale models
Streams
Terrestrial environments
tierras privadas
wildlife
Wildlife conservation
wildlife corridors
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
áreas protegidas
保护地
土地利用规划
景观破碎化
河岸生境
法律
私有土地
连接度
野生动物廊道
tierras privadas
landscape fragmentation
ley
law
景观破碎化
corredores de fauna
áreas protegidas
hábitat ribereño
野生动物廊道
planeación del uso de suelo
fragmentación del paisaje
conectividad
保护地
connectivity
protected areas
wildlife corridors
private lands
连接度
土地利用规划
land-use planning
法律
riparian habitat
河岸生境
私有土地
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site‐specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data‐driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal‐ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least‐cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least‐cost corridors in the integrated, local‐scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national‐scale least‐cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal‐ and naturalness‐based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife. Mapeo de la Autoridad Legal para los Corredores Terrestres de Conservación a lo Largo de Ríos Stahl et al. Resumen Los corredores de fauna buscan promover la persistencia de las especies al conectar los fragmentos de hábitat a lo largo de paisajes fragmentados. Su implementación está limitada por los patrones de propiedad de tierras y se complica con las diferencias entre las autoridades jurisdiccionales y regulatorias que las administran. La conservación por corredores terrestres requiere de coordinación entre las jurisdicciones y los sectores sujetos a fuentes de autoridad legal que se traslapan y que son específicas del sitio. El mapeo de los patrones espaciales de la autoridad legal simultánea a la condición del hábitat puede ilustrar oportunidades para construir o hacer uso de la capacidad para la conservación por conectividad. Las áreas adyacentes a los cauces fluviales proporcionan oportunidades prácticas para hacer uso de los mecanismos políticos existentes para la conectividad de hábitats ribereño y terrestre a través de las fronteras. Los planificadores y practicantes de la conservación pueden usar estas oportunidades al armonizar las acciones para múltiples resultados de conservación. Formulamos un método integrativo orientado por los datos para mapear las múltiples fuentes de autoridad legal ponderadas por la capacidad para coordinar la conservación de hábitats terrestres a lo largo de ríos. Generamos un mapa de la capacidad para coordinar los corredores de protección a lo largo de los vacíos en los hábitats de fauna para demostrar esta estrategia. Combinamos los valores por medio de la representación de la capacidad de coordinación y la naturalidad para generar un mapa de resistencia legal y ecológica para el modelado de la conectividad. Después, computamos los corredores de menor costo en todo el mapa integrado, enmascarando el paisaje terrestre para enfocarnos en las áreas adyacentes al cauce fluvial. Los corredores de menor costo adyacentes a los cauces dentro del modelo integrado de escala local difirieron (∼25 km) de los corredores de menor costo basados en la naturalidad a escala nacional. Las categorías espaciales que compararon los valores de resistencia basada en la legalidad y en la naturalidad por alcance del río resaltaron las localidades potenciales para la construcción o el uso de la capacidad existente por medio de la coordinación espacial de los mecanismos de política o de las acciones de restauración. Las agencias y organizaciones no gubernamentales con la intención de restaurar o mantener la conectividad del hábitat en un paisaje fragmentado pueden utilizar esta estrategia para informar la priorización espacial y construir la capacidad de coordinación. 摘要 野生动物廊道旨在通过连接破碎景观中的栖息地斑块来提高物种的续存, 但其建设受限于土地所有制模式, 还会因管理土地的管辖及监管机构不同而更加复杂。陆地廊道保护需要多个司法管辖区和各地受到多种法定权威管制的部门之间的协调。将法定权威的空间格局与栖息地条件的分布地图相叠加, 将有利于开展廊道连接度保护的能力建设及利用。河流沿岸地区为现有的跨境河流及陆地栖息地连接度的相关政策机制的应用提供了实践机会。保护规划者和实施者可以利用这些机会协调多方行动以取得各方面的保护成效。我们制定了一个综合的、基于数据驱动的方法, 可以将协调河流沿岸陆地栖息地保护的能力作为权重来绘制多个法定权威来源的地图。为了演示这个方法, 我们绘制了一张协调跨越野生动物栖息地空缺地带的河流沿岸廊道保护力地图。我们将代表协调能力和自然特性的数值相结合, 生成了一张用于连接度建模的法律‐生态抵抗力综合地图。随后, 我们忽略陆地景观, 将重点放在河流沿岸地区, 计算了整个综合地图的最低成本廊道。结果显示, 由局部尺度的综合模型得到的河流沿岸最低成本廊道与基于自然特性的国家尺度最低成本廊道偏离约 25 公里。河流沿岸基于法律和自然特性抵抗力比较的空间分类进一步展示了可以通过政策机制或恢复行动的空间协调来建设和利用现有能力的潜在地点。计划恢复或维持破碎景观之间的栖息地连接度的机构或非政府组织可以应用这种方法确定优先保护的空间并建立协调力。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】
AbstractList Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site‐specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data‐driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal‐ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least‐cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least‐cost corridors in the integrated, local‐scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national‐scale least‐cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal‐ and naturalness‐based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.
Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site‐specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data‐driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal‐ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least‐cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least‐cost corridors in the integrated, local‐scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national‐scale least‐cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal‐ and naturalness‐based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement : Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife. 野生动物廊道旨在通过连接破碎景观中的栖息地斑块来提高物种的续存, 但其建设受限于土地所有制模式, 还会因管理土地的管辖及监管机构不同而更加复杂。陆地廊道保护需要多个司法管辖区和各地受到多种法定权威管制的部门之间的协调。将法定权威的空间格局与栖息地条件的分布地图相叠加, 将有利于开展廊道连接度保护的能力建设及利用。河流沿岸地区为现有的跨境河流及陆地栖息地连接度的相关政策机制的应用提供了实践机会。保护规划者和实施者可以利用这些机会协调多方行动以取得各方面的保护成效。我们制定了一个综合的、基于数据驱动的方法, 可以将协调河流沿岸陆地栖息地保护的能力作为权重来绘制多个法定权威来源的地图。为了演示这个方法, 我们绘制了一张协调跨越野生动物栖息地空缺地带的河流沿岸廊道保护力地图。我们将代表协调能力和自然特性的数值相结合, 生成了一张用于连接度建模的法律‐生态抵抗力综合地图。随后, 我们忽略陆地景观, 将重点放在河流沿岸地区, 计算了整个综合地图的最低成本廊道。结果显示, 由局部尺度的综合模型得到的河流沿岸最低成本廊道与基于自然特性的国家尺度最低成本廊道偏离约 25 公里。河流沿岸基于法律和自然特性抵抗力比较的空间分类进一步展示了可以通过政策机制或恢复行动的空间协调来建设和利用现有能力的潜在地点。计划恢复或维持破碎景观之间的栖息地连接度的机构或非政府组织可以应用这种方法确定优先保护的空间并建立协调力。 【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】
Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site‐specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data‐driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal‐ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least‐cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least‐cost corridors in the integrated, local‐scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national‐scale least‐cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal‐ and naturalness‐based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement : Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.
Wildlife corridors aim to promote species' persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site-specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data-driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal-ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least-cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least-cost corridors in the integrated, local-scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national-scale least-cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal- and naturalness-based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.Wildlife corridors aim to promote species' persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site-specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data-driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal-ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least-cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least-cost corridors in the integrated, local-scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national-scale least-cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal- and naturalness-based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.
Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns of land ownership and complicated by differences in the jurisdictional and regulatory authorities under which lands are managed. Terrestrial corridor conservation requires coordination across jurisdictions and sectors subject to site‐specific overlapping sources of legal authority. Mapping spatial patterns of legal authority concurrent with habitat condition can illustrate opportunities to build or leverage capacity for connectivity conservation. Streamside areas provide pragmatic opportunities to leverage existing policy mechanisms for riverine and terrestrial habitat connectivity across boundaries. Conservation planners and practitioners can make use of these opportunities by harmonizing actions for multiple conservation outcomes. We formulated an integrative, data‐driven method for mapping multiple sources of legal authority weighted by capacity for coordinating terrestrial habitat conservation along streams. We generated a map of capacity to coordinate streamside corridor protections across a wildlife habitat gap to demonstrate this approach. We combined values representing coordination capacity and naturalness to generate an integrated legal‐ecological resistance map for connectivity modeling. We then computed least‐cost corridors across the integrated map, masking the terrestrial landscape to focus on streamside areas. Streamside least‐cost corridors in the integrated, local‐scale model diverged (∼25 km) from national‐scale least‐cost corridors based on naturalness. Spatial categories comparing legal‐ and naturalness‐based resistance values by stream reach highlighted potential locations for building or leveraging existing capacity through spatial coordination of policy mechanisms or restoration actions. Agencies or nongovernmental organizations intending to restore or maintain habitat connectivity across fragmented landscapes can use this approach to inform spatial prioritization and build coordination capacity. Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife. Mapeo de la Autoridad Legal para los Corredores Terrestres de Conservación a lo Largo de Ríos Stahl et al. Resumen Los corredores de fauna buscan promover la persistencia de las especies al conectar los fragmentos de hábitat a lo largo de paisajes fragmentados. Su implementación está limitada por los patrones de propiedad de tierras y se complica con las diferencias entre las autoridades jurisdiccionales y regulatorias que las administran. La conservación por corredores terrestres requiere de coordinación entre las jurisdicciones y los sectores sujetos a fuentes de autoridad legal que se traslapan y que son específicas del sitio. El mapeo de los patrones espaciales de la autoridad legal simultánea a la condición del hábitat puede ilustrar oportunidades para construir o hacer uso de la capacidad para la conservación por conectividad. Las áreas adyacentes a los cauces fluviales proporcionan oportunidades prácticas para hacer uso de los mecanismos políticos existentes para la conectividad de hábitats ribereño y terrestre a través de las fronteras. Los planificadores y practicantes de la conservación pueden usar estas oportunidades al armonizar las acciones para múltiples resultados de conservación. Formulamos un método integrativo orientado por los datos para mapear las múltiples fuentes de autoridad legal ponderadas por la capacidad para coordinar la conservación de hábitats terrestres a lo largo de ríos. Generamos un mapa de la capacidad para coordinar los corredores de protección a lo largo de los vacíos en los hábitats de fauna para demostrar esta estrategia. Combinamos los valores por medio de la representación de la capacidad de coordinación y la naturalidad para generar un mapa de resistencia legal y ecológica para el modelado de la conectividad. Después, computamos los corredores de menor costo en todo el mapa integrado, enmascarando el paisaje terrestre para enfocarnos en las áreas adyacentes al cauce fluvial. Los corredores de menor costo adyacentes a los cauces dentro del modelo integrado de escala local difirieron (∼25 km) de los corredores de menor costo basados en la naturalidad a escala nacional. Las categorías espaciales que compararon los valores de resistencia basada en la legalidad y en la naturalidad por alcance del río resaltaron las localidades potenciales para la construcción o el uso de la capacidad existente por medio de la coordinación espacial de los mecanismos de política o de las acciones de restauración. Las agencias y organizaciones no gubernamentales con la intención de restaurar o mantener la conectividad del hábitat en un paisaje fragmentado pueden utilizar esta estrategia para informar la priorización espacial y construir la capacidad de coordinación. 摘要 野生动物廊道旨在通过连接破碎景观中的栖息地斑块来提高物种的续存, 但其建设受限于土地所有制模式, 还会因管理土地的管辖及监管机构不同而更加复杂。陆地廊道保护需要多个司法管辖区和各地受到多种法定权威管制的部门之间的协调。将法定权威的空间格局与栖息地条件的分布地图相叠加, 将有利于开展廊道连接度保护的能力建设及利用。河流沿岸地区为现有的跨境河流及陆地栖息地连接度的相关政策机制的应用提供了实践机会。保护规划者和实施者可以利用这些机会协调多方行动以取得各方面的保护成效。我们制定了一个综合的、基于数据驱动的方法, 可以将协调河流沿岸陆地栖息地保护的能力作为权重来绘制多个法定权威来源的地图。为了演示这个方法, 我们绘制了一张协调跨越野生动物栖息地空缺地带的河流沿岸廊道保护力地图。我们将代表协调能力和自然特性的数值相结合, 生成了一张用于连接度建模的法律‐生态抵抗力综合地图。随后, 我们忽略陆地景观, 将重点放在河流沿岸地区, 计算了整个综合地图的最低成本廊道。结果显示, 由局部尺度的综合模型得到的河流沿岸最低成本廊道与基于自然特性的国家尺度最低成本廊道偏离约 25 公里。河流沿岸基于法律和自然特性抵抗力比较的空间分类进一步展示了可以通过政策机制或恢复行动的空间协调来建设和利用现有能力的潜在地点。计划恢复或维持破碎景观之间的栖息地连接度的机构或非政府组织可以应用这种方法确定优先保护的空间并建立协调力。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】
Author Fremier, Alexander K.
Cosens, Barbara A.
Stahl, Amanda T.
AuthorAffiliation 2 College of Law University of Idaho 875 Perimeter Dr. MS 2321 Moscow ID 83844‐2321 U.S.A
1 School of the Environment Washington State University P.O. Box 642812 Pullman WA 99164‐2812 U.S.A
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 College of Law University of Idaho 875 Perimeter Dr. MS 2321 Moscow ID 83844‐2321 U.S.A
– name: 1 School of the Environment Washington State University P.O. Box 642812 Pullman WA 99164‐2812 U.S.A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Amanda T.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5813-1332
  surname: Stahl
  fullname: Stahl, Amanda T.
  email: atstahl@wsu.edu
  organization: Washington State University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Alexander K.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4104-6633
  surname: Fremier
  fullname: Fremier, Alexander K.
  organization: Washington State University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Barbara A.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5188-7081
  surname: Cosens
  fullname: Cosens, Barbara A.
  organization: University of Idaho
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32056252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1LYzEUhoMoWj82_oDhwmxk4NZ8NslG0OKoUHGj65Cbm9ZImtTkXqX_3mirqAxONodwnvflnPPugs0QgwXgEMEhKu_YxMYNEaGCboABYpjUiBO5CQZQCFELIfEO2M35AUIoGaLbYIdgyEaY4QGYXOvFwoVZ5e1M-0r33X1MrltW05iqzqZkc5dc6ZgYsk1PunMxlE9Kro0pV9rHIi6M1fO8D7am2md7sK574O7v-e34sp7cXFyNTye1oQLRuoFlVIGY4AaxRlKjmZW41agZNUS0xhqpRTsiFHEuNG5ag6ZmRASlDBLBGrIHTla-i76Z2yIIXdJeLZKb67RUUTv1tRPcvZrFJ8Wp5JCjYnC0NkjxsS8rqrnLxnqvg419VphxSjjHiPwfJYxJCglkBf39DX2IfQrlEgpTgonkXPJC_fo8_MfU75kUAK4Ak2LOyU6Vcd3b3csuzisE1Wvs6jV29RZ7kfz5Jnl3_SeMVvCz83b5A6nGN2dXK80LaXy90g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_023_01672_4
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_87162_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_land13101552
crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10525
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_023_29154_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13986
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2024_1306386
crossref_primary_10_1093_biosci_biab100
crossref_primary_10_1093_biosci_biab140
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2020_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_13034
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10340
Cites_doi 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
10.1073/pnas.1906247116
10.1016/j.jglr.2016.09.010
10.1126/science.1172133
10.1126/sciadv.1500052
10.5751/ES-02930-140216
10.1007/s10980-017-0489-8
10.1007/s10980-016-0428-0
10.5751/ES-08731-220130
10.1080/08941920802178214
10.1126/science.1129706
10.1007/s10980-013-9941-6
10.5751/ES-06880-190423
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01467.x
10.1007/s10531-018-1571-5
10.1111/conl.12249
10.5751/ES-01759-110208
10.5751/ES-02827-140126
10.1371/journal.pone.0154223
10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023
10.1126/science.aan1114
10.5751/ES-02064-120130
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.013
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.011
10.5751/ES-10676-240122
10.5751/ES-01976-120128
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.029
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.039
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.020
10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
10.1126/science.1091015
10.1890/07-1861.1
10.5751/ES-04821-170302
10.3200/ENVT.49.4.20-33
10.1126/science.1109769
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.024
10.1068/b130099p
10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.5.x
10.5751/ES-01606-110119
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
10.3368/le.84.2.225
10.1111/cobi.12667
10.1073/pnas.1604405114
10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
– notice: 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
– notice: 2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QG
7SN
7SS
7ST
7U6
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
RC3
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13484
DatabaseName Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
CrossRef
PubMed
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Technology Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
PubMed
CrossRef

MEDLINE - Academic

Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Ecology
Law
DocumentTitleAlternate Stahl et al
EISSN 1523-1739
EndPage 955
ExternalDocumentID PMC7497071
32056252
10_1111_cobi_13484
COBI13484
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: U.S. Geological Survey
  funderid: Section 104b State Water Resources Research
– fundername: U.S. Geological Survey
  grantid: Section 104b State Water Resources Research
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Section 104b State Water Resources Research
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
.-4
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
24P
29F
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
42X
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHKG
AAHQN
AAISJ
AAKGQ
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAUTI
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABBHK
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPLY
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABTLG
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHIC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACPVT
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACSTJ
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADUKH
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUPB
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFAZZ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHXOZ
AI.
AIAGR
AILXY
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ANHSF
AQVQM
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
CBGCD
COF
CS3
CUYZI
D-E
D-F
D0L
DCZOG
DEVKO
DOOOF
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GTFYD
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGD
HGLYW
HQ2
HTVGU
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IPSME
IX1
J0M
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JEB
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JSODD
JST
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LMP
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NEJ
NF~
O66
O9-
OES
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QN7
R.K
ROL
RSU
RX1
SA0
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
TN5
UB1
UKR
UQL
V8K
VH1
VOH
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHG
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XIH
XSW
YFH
YUY
YV5
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZO4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAYXX
ABSQW
ADXHL
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGUYK
AGYGG
CITATION
NPM
7QG
7SN
7SS
7ST
7U6
8FD
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
RC3
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4814-b048481587c15b94ca5e92da1b6b38dcec9a8d6341778a2bdc1fc6384450385b3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0888-8892
1523-1739
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:53:49 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:23:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:05:34 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:44:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:01:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:25:31 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:34:56 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords tierras privadas
landscape fragmentation
ley
law
景观破碎化
corredores de fauna
áreas protegidas
hábitat ribereño
野生动物廊道
planeación del uso de suelo
fragmentación del paisaje
conectividad
保护地
connectivity
protected areas
wildlife corridors
private lands
连接度
土地利用规划
land-use planning
法律
riparian habitat
河岸生境
私有土地
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4814-b048481587c15b94ca5e92da1b6b38dcec9a8d6341778a2bdc1fc6384450385b3
Notes Article impact statement
Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Article impact statement: Combined mapping of legal authority and habitat condition reveals capacity to coordinate actions along streams for clean water and wildlife.
ORCID 0000-0002-4104-6633
0000-0002-5813-1332
0000-0002-5188-7081
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcobi.13484
PMID 32056252
PQID 2432397797
PQPubID 36794
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7497071
proquest_miscellaneous_2574377213
proquest_miscellaneous_2355940305
proquest_journals_2432397797
pubmed_primary_32056252
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cobi_13484
crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_13484
wiley_primary_10_1111_cobi_13484_COBI13484
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2020
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2020
  text: August 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Washington
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Conservation biology
PublicationTitleAlternate Conserv Biol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 2013; 28
2015; 30
2013; 166
2016; 30
2003; 17
2012; 17
2017; 114
2017; 357
2010; 23
2009; 14
2015; 137
2019; 24
2015; 42
2017; 32
2016; 42
2005; 30
2019; 116
2003; 4
2005; 308
2014; 19
2018; 219
2009; 19
2019; 232
2009; 325
2015; 1
2012
2006; 11
2017; 22
2007
2006
2002
2006; 313
2007; 12
2018; 27
2016; 11
2009; 34
2015; 191
2015; 192
2017; 10
2019
2018
2008; 89
2016
2015
2014
2008; 41
2009; 142
2013
2003; 302
2008; 84
2007; 49
e_1_2_6_51_1
e_1_2_6_32_1
e_1_2_6_30_1
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) Gap Analysis Program (e_1_2_6_52_1) 2016
Chester CC. (e_1_2_6_15_1) 2012
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_36_1
e_1_2_6_59_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_38_1
e_1_2_6_57_1
e_1_2_6_43_1
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
Armitage DR (e_1_2_6_3_1) 2007
GNLCC (Great Northern Conservation Cooperative) (e_1_2_6_29_1) 2016
e_1_2_6_5_1
Gray M (e_1_2_6_28_1) 2018
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_49_1
e_1_2_6_22_1
e_1_2_6_45_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
e_1_2_6_47_1
e_1_2_6_54_1
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_50_1
Jennings M (e_1_2_6_34_1) 2019
Hilty JA (e_1_2_6_31_1) 2006
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (e_1_2_6_53_1) 2013
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_33_1
Salamon LM. (e_1_2_6_48_1) 2002
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_39_1
e_1_2_6_56_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
e_1_2_6_58_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
e_1_2_6_40_1
Burris S (e_1_2_6_12_1) 2008; 41
e_1_2_6_8_1
Ament R (e_1_2_6_2_1) 2014
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
Brinson MM (e_1_2_6_9_1) 2002
e_1_2_6_25_1
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) (e_1_2_6_55_1) 2015
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_44_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_46_1
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 699
  year: 2015
  end-page: 713
  article-title: Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning
  publication-title: Landscape Ecology
– volume: 11
  year: 2016
  article-title: Identifying corridors among large protected areas in the United States
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 19
  start-page: 354
  year: 2009
  end-page: 365
  article-title: A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi‐level learning processes in resource governance regimes
  publication-title: Global Environmental Change
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth ecosystems
  publication-title: Science Advances
– volume: 357
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social‐ecological systems
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2815
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2836
  article-title: Thresholds of riparian forest use by terrestrial mammals in a fragmented Amazonian deforestation frontier
  publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation
– volume: 17
  start-page: 116
  year: 2003
  end-page: 131
  article-title: Mapping the conservation landscape
  publication-title: Conservation Biology
– volume: 32
  start-page: 835
  year: 2017
  end-page: 855
  article-title: Sensitivity of resource selection and connectivity models to landscape definition
  publication-title: Landscape Ecology
– volume: 219
  start-page: 53
  year: 2018
  end-page: 67
  article-title: Protected area connectivity: shortfalls in global targets and country‐level priorities
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 232
  start-page: 83
  year: 2019
  end-page: 96
  article-title: Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large‐landscape conservation
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 41
  start-page: 66
  year: 2008
  article-title: Changes in governance: a cross‐disciplinary review of current scholarship
  publication-title: Akron Law Review
– year: 2018
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1372
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1385
  article-title: Making the leap from science to implementation: strategic agricultural conservation in Michigan's Saginaw Bay watershed
  publication-title: Journal of Great Lakes Research
– year: 2014
– volume: 14
  year: 2009
  article-title: Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co‐) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 12
  year: 2007
  article-title: The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 313
  start-page: 617
  year: 2006
  end-page: 618
  article-title: Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 23
  start-page: 986
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1001
  article-title: Governance principles for natural resource management
  publication-title: Society and Natural Resources
– volume: 191
  start-page: 29
  year: 2015
  end-page: 37
  article-title: A riparian conservation network for ecological resilience
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 11
  year: 2006
  article-title: Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social‐ecological systems
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 11
  start-page: art8
  year: 2006
  article-title: Scale and cross‐scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 325
  start-page: 419
  year: 2009
  end-page: 422
  article-title: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social‐ecological systems
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 142
  start-page: 1628
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1638
  article-title: Assessing threats to pool‐breeding amphibian habitat in an urbanizing landscape
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– year: 2019
– volume: 84
  start-page: 225
  year: 2008
  end-page: 240
  article-title: Public benefits, private benefits, and policy mechanism choice for land‐use change for environmental benefits
  publication-title: Land Economics
– year: 2015
– volume: 89
  start-page: 2712
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2724
  article-title: Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 308
  start-page: 636
  year: 2005
  end-page: 637
  article-title: Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 4
  start-page: S39
  year: 2003
  end-page: S45
  article-title: Triage: How do we prioritize health care for landscapes?
  publication-title: Ecological Management & Restoration
– volume: 19
  year: 2014
  article-title: Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 137
  start-page: 64
  year: 2015
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Fragmented water quality governance: constraints to spatial targeting for nutrient reduction in a Midwestern USA watershed
  publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1020
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1039
  article-title: Mapping policies and programmes: the use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England
  publication-title: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
– volume: 302
  start-page: 1907
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1912
  article-title: The struggle to govern the commons
  publication-title: Science
– year: 2007
– volume: 12
  year: 2007
  article-title: Enhancing the fit through adaptive co‐management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 10
  start-page: 77
  year: 2017
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Missing the boat on freshwater fish conservation in California
  publication-title: Conservation Letters
– volume: 30
  start-page: 441
  year: 2005
  end-page: 473
  article-title: Adaptive governance of social‐ecological systems
  publication-title: Annual Review of Environment and Resources
– volume: 14
  year: 2009
  article-title: Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 17
  start-page: art2
  year: 2012
  article-title: Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: Implementing the EU water framework directive
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 32
  start-page: 59
  year: 2017
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Spatial fit between water quality policies and hydrologic ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural landscape
  publication-title: Landscape Ecology
– year: 2016
– volume: 192
  start-page: 135
  year: 2015
  end-page: 144
  article-title: An evaluation of environmental, institutional and socio‐economic factors explaining successful conservation plan implementation in the north‐central United States
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– year: 2012
– volume: 166
  start-page: 144
  year: 2013
  end-page: 154
  article-title: Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 22
  year: 2017
  article-title: The role of law in adaptive governance
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 34
  start-page: 253
  year: 2009
  end-page: 278
  article-title: Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social‐ecological systems: the role of social capital
  publication-title: Annual Review of Environment and Resources
– volume: 24
  year: 2019
  article-title: Patterns of riparian policy standards in riverscapes of the Oregon Coast Range
  publication-title: Ecology and Society
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1859
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1874
  article-title: A general model to quantify ecological integrity for landscape assessments and US application
  publication-title: Landscape Ecology
– volume: 114
  start-page: E1776
  year: 2017
  end-page: E1785
  article-title: Social‐ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
– year: 2002
– volume: 30
  start-page: 950
  year: 2016
  end-page: 961
  article-title: Connecting science, policy, and implementation for landscape‐scale habitat connectivity
  publication-title: Conservation Biology
– year: 2006
– volume: 49
  start-page: 20
  year: 2007
  end-page: 32
  article-title: Solving the crisis in ocean governance place‐based management of marine ecosystems
  publication-title: Environment
– volume: 116
  start-page: 19899
  year: 2019
  end-page: 19904
  article-title: Untapped capacity for resilience in environmental law
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
– year: 2013
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
– volume-title: Building landscape connectivity for climate adaptation: Mayacamas to Berryessa
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906247116
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.09.010
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1172133
– volume-title: Wildlife connectivity: Fundamentals for conservation action
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-02930-140216
– ident: e_1_2_6_58_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0489-8
– volume-title: Adaptive co‐management: Collaboration, learning and multi‐level governance
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
– volume-title: Riparian areas: Functions and strategies for management
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_45_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0428-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-08731-220130
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1080/08941920802178214
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1129706
– ident: e_1_2_6_51_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9941-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-06880-190423
– volume-title: Providing a regional connectivity perspective to local connectivity conservation decisions in the British Columbia–Washington transboundary region
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_46_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01467.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_47_1
– volume-title: Conservation across borders: Biodiversity in an interdependent world
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_59_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10531-018-1571-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1111/conl.12249
– volume-title: Climate resilient connectivity for the South Coast ecoregion of California
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
– volume-title: Protected areas database of the United States (PAD‐US)
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_6_52_1
– volume-title: Corridor ecology: the science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-01759-110208
– ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-02827-140126
– volume-title: National hydrography geodatabase
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_6_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154223
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.aan1114
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-02064-120130
– volume: 41
  start-page: 66
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  article-title: Changes in governance: a cross‐disciplinary review of current scholarship
  publication-title: Akron Law Review
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.013
– ident: e_1_2_6_54_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.011
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-10676-240122
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-01976-120128
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.029
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.039
– volume-title: The tools of government: a guide to the new governance
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_48_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_49_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.020
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1091015
– ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
  doi: 10.1890/07-1861.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-04821-170302
– ident: e_1_2_6_57_1
  doi: 10.3200/ENVT.49.4.20-33
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1109769
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.024
– ident: e_1_2_6_56_1
  doi: 10.1068/b130099p
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.5.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.5751/ES-01606-110119
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
– ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
  doi: 10.3368/le.84.2.225
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/cobi.12667
– ident: e_1_2_6_50_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114
– volume-title: Washington's state wildlife action plan: 2015 update
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_6_55_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0
SSID ssj0009514
Score 2.4097087
Snippet Wildlife corridors aim to promote species’ persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns...
Wildlife corridors aim to promote species' persistence by connecting habitat patches across fragmented landscapes. Their implementation is limited by patterns...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 943
SubjectTerms Capacity
conectividad
Connecting
connectivity
Conservation
Contributed Paper
Contributed Papers
Coordination
corredores de fauna
Corridors
Environmental protection
Fauna
fragmentación del paisaje
Habitat connectivity
habitat conservation
Habitat corridors
Habitats
hábitat ribereño
issues and policy
Jurisdiction
Land ownership
Landscape
landscape fragmentation
landscapes
land‐use planning
law
ley
Mapping
Masking
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
planeación del uso de suelo
Policies
prioritization
private lands
protected areas
Restoration
riparian areas
riparian habitat
Rivers
Scale models
Streams
Terrestrial environments
tierras privadas
wildlife
Wildlife conservation
wildlife corridors
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
áreas protegidas
保护地
土地利用规划
景观破碎化
河岸生境
法律
私有土地
连接度
野生动物廊道
Title Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcobi.13484
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32056252
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2432397797
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2355940305
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2574377213
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7497071
Volume 34
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1baxUxEB7aguCL98tqLSv6orCHzW13A75oaanSqoiFvsiSZLP24HFXzgXRX-9M9uI5Vgr6liUTyGUm8yU7-QbgaaVYnUlfJxWvs0SaTCQmq10iUqeYFZ6J8Ejs5G12dCrfnKmzLXgxvIXp-CHGCzeyjLBfk4Ebu1gzctfa6YQJWRAZKAVrESL6wNcYdztibzziJUWhec9NSmE8v5tueqMLEPNipOQ6gg0u6PA6fBo630WefJmslnbifv7B6_i_o7sB13psGr_slOkmbPnmFlzpslX-wNKB60vbx-b7bTg-MUTu8DmeeXQzsVktz1tKhRcjDo5xuSjrB6l37Chiu7_7xY_5fFq180VsZi02pscq5uviDpweHnzcP0r65AyJkwWTiUXTJ6KXIndMWS2dUV7zyjCbWVHghDltiipDJ5nnheG2cqx2aOxSEgGNsuIu7DRt4-9DrFBPclQLrlMpHUu18amunbCpcL7SOoJnwyKVrmcupwQas3I4wdBslWG2Ingyyn7r-Dr-KrU7rHXZ2-yi5FJwgsM6j-DxWI3WRr9QTOPbFcogPNOSNslLZBSiMjy0MBHBvU59xq4IToBT8QjyDcUaBYjte7OmmZ4H1u9c6hzxYATPg95cMrpy_92r16H04F-EH8JVTpcJIbpxF3aW85V_hIhrafdgm8v3e8G-fgFy5Sib
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB7RIgQXyrOEFgiCC0hZxY88fISq1RZ2i4RaqbfIdhy66pKgfQjBr2fGyYZdiirBzZHHUmLPeD5Pxt8AvC4TVqXSVVHJqzSSOhWRTisbidgmzAjHhL8kNj5Jh2fyw3ly3uXm0F2Ylh-iD7iRZfj9mgycAtJrVm4bMxkwIXO5BTeppLc_UX3ma5y7LbU3HvKiPFe8YyelRJ7fYzf90RWQeTVXch3Deid0tNNWWp177kLKPbkcLBdmYH_-wez43993D-528DR81-rTfbjh6gdwqy1Y-QNbh7ZrbY3094cwGmvid_gSTh16mlAvFxcNVcMLEQqHuGJU-IM0PLSUtN2Ff_FhNpuUzWwe6mmDg-m-iv46fwRnR4enB8Ooq88QWZkzGRm0fuJ6yTPLEqOk1YlTvNTMpEbkOGNW6bxM0U9mWa65KS2rLNq7lMRBkxjxGLbrpnZPIExQVTLUDK5iKS2LlXaxqqwwsbCuVCqAN6tVKmxHXk41NKbF6hBDs1X42QrgVS_7raXs-KvU_mqxi85s5wWXghMiVlkAL_tuNDj6i6Jr1yxRBhGakrRPXiOTIDDDcwsTAey2-tO_iuCEORMeQLahWb0AEX5v9tSTC0_8nUmVISQM4K1XnGu-rjj49P7Yt57-i_ALuD08HY-K0fHJxz24wym24JMd92F7MVu6ZwjAFua5N7Nf3Yor3w
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB61RaC-cFNCCwTBC0hZxUcOS7xA21UL24IQlfqCIttx6IolqfYQor-emVzsUlQJ3hx5LPmY8Xx2xt8AvMgjVsTSFUHOiziQOhaBjgsbiNBGzAjHRP1I7Og4PjiR706j0zV43b2Fafgh-gs3sox6vyYDP8-LJSO3lRkPmJCpXIdrMg5T0um9T3yJcrdh9sYzXpCmirfkpBTH87vtqju6hDEvh0ouQ9jaBw1vwZeu903oybfBYm4G9uIPYsf_Hd5tuNmCU_9No013YM2Vd-F6k67yJ5b2bVtaH-kf92B0pInd4as_cehnfL2Yn1WUC89HIOzjelHaD9Jv31LIdnv5ix_T6TivpjNfTypsTK9V9PfZfTgZ7n_ePQja7AyBlSmTgUHbJ6aXNLEsMkpaHTnFc81MbESKE2aVTvMYvWSSpJqb3LLCorVLSQw0kREPYKOsSvcQ_AgVJUG94CqU0rJQaReqwgoTCutypTx42S1SZlvqcsqgMcm6IwzNVlbPlgfPe9nzhrDjr1I73VpnrdHOMi4FJzysEg-e9dVobvQPRZeuWqAM4jMlaZe8QiZCWIanFiY82GrUp--K4IQ4I-5BsqJYvQDRfa_WlOOzmvY7kSpBQOjBq1pvrhhdtvvh7WFdevQvwk_hxse9YTY6PH6_DZucLhbqSMcd2JhPF-4xoq-5eVIb2S9c8SqX
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping+legal+authority+for+terrestrial+conservation+corridors+along+streams&rft.jtitle=Conservation+biology&rft.au=Stahl%2C+Amanda+T&rft.au=Fremier%2C+Alexander+K&rft.au=Cosens%2C+Barbara+A&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.issn=1523-1739&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcobi.13484&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0888-8892&client=summon