Hypergravity resistance exercise: the use of artificial gravity as potential countermeasure to microgravity

Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California Submitted 16 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007 The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 103; no. 5; pp. 1879 - 1887
Main Authors Yang, Yifan, Baker, Michael, Graf, Scott, Larson, Jennifer, Caiozzo, Vincent J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Am Physiological Soc 01.11.2007
American Physiological Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California Submitted 16 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007 The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2 ) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. Space Cycle; squats; space; spaceflight; human centrifuge Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. J. Caiozzo, Medical Sciences I B-152, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Univ. of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: vjcaiozz{at}uci.edu )
AbstractList The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G... condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G...). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G... In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California Submitted 16 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007 The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2 ) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. Space Cycle; squats; space; spaceflight; human centrifuge Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. J. Caiozzo, Medical Sciences I B-152, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Univ. of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: vjcaiozz{at}uci.edu )
The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G sub(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G sub(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G sub(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.
The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.
The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.
The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.
Author Baker, Michael
Larson, Jennifer
Caiozzo, Vincent J
Yang, Yifan
Graf, Scott
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Yang, Yifan
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Baker, Michael
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Graf, Scott
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Larson, Jennifer
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Caiozzo, Vincent J
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19214086$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17872403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkVFr1TAYhoNM3Nn0L2gRFLzoMUmTphW8kLE5YeDNvA5p-vWcHHOamqS6_nvTnY4jA9HcfJA8zwd53zN00rseEHpF8JoQTt_v1DDYYTsF4-waYyHomqbxBK3SK81JickJWlWC41zwSpyisxB2GBPGOHmGTomoBGW4WKHv19MAfuPVTxOnzEMwIapeQwZ34LUJ8CGLW8jGAJnrMuWj6Yw2ymYPigrZ4CL0cb7Ubuwj-D2oMHrIosv2Rnu3sM_R007ZAC-WeY6-XV3eXlznN18_f7n4dJNrJuqYU8GILhUGEC3DXU1a3pRcsIY2SpCOAykUgYI0mpV1xcoWKtK2dQoBN6LVqjhHbw97B-9-jBCi3JugwVrVgxuDLCvGaFGIf4IUc0yrCifw9SNw50bfp09IOh_OyzJBLxdobPbQysGbvfKTfAg7AW8WQAWtbOdT0CYcuZoShqt5kThwKboQPHRHBMu5fvln_fK-fjnXn8yPj0xtoorG9dErY__Df3fwt2az_WU8yAVym2mW0oJCckkqUSeW_529Gq29hbs4S0dHDm1X_AZX2t7J
CODEN JAPHEV
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_011_2083_0
crossref_primary_10_1096_fj_202201781R
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_1024389
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2018_01492
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12217_024_10124_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actaastro_2019_03_006
crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_16034
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2018_01759
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reach_2019_100030
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00314_2019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12576_016_0514_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reach_2016_01_001
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00499_2009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bone_2015_12_057
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actaastro_2010_06_032
crossref_primary_10_1113_EP089734
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_644661
crossref_primary_10_1134_S0362119717050127
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_91130_2008
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu4122047
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00039-3
10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.7
10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00043-5
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09198.x
10.1249/01.MSS.0000058367.66796.35
10.1519/00124278-200702000-00027
10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00115-5
10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062166
10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00028-9
10.1007/s00421-004-1308-x
10.1249/00003677-199600240-00014
10.1097/00006842-200111000-00003
10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01293.x
10.1097/00005768-199811000-00010
10.1007/s002210100706
10.1139/h05-103
10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01457.x
10.1002/jbmr.5650101014
10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003
10.1359/JBMR.040307
10.1097/00005768-199704000-00016
10.1007/s00421-004-1172-8
10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00101-1
10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00100-X
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2007 INIST-CNRS
Copyright American Physiological Society Nov 2007
Copyright_xml – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright American Physiological Society Nov 2007
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7QR
7TK
7TS
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Technology Research Database

Physical Education Index
MEDLINE
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1601
EndPage 1887
ExternalDocumentID 1380100201
17872403
19214086
10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007
jap_103_5_1879
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Comparative Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Feature
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS
  grantid: M01-RR-00827
GroupedDBID -
02
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
55
5VS
85S
AALRV
ABFLS
ABOCM
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADBIT
AEILP
AENEX
AEULQ
AFDAS
AFRAH
AGCDD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
GX1
H13
H~9
KQ8
L7B
MYA
NEJ
O0-
OHT
OK1
P-O
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
SJN
UHB
UKR
UPT
WH7
WOQ
X
X7M
YCJ
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
18M
1CY
29J
3O-
8M5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABDNZ
ABHWK
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACBEA
ACGFO
ACKIV
ACYGS
ADFNX
ADXHL
AETEA
AFOSN
AGNAY
AI.
AIDAL
AJUXI
BKKCC
BTFSW
C2-
CITATION
EMOBN
ITBOX
J5H
MVM
P6G
RPRKH
TR2
VH1
W8F
XOL
XSW
YBH
YQJ
YQT
YWH
ZXP
~02
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7QR
7TK
7TS
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-2741c6a0ee7d40f91d5b6574b2ba71f5e13a1e31bc469846de81dd90770b7dca3
ISSN 8750-7587
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 21:13:18 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 09:40:37 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:36:13 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:09:53 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:16:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:13:22 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 17:53:18 EST 2021
Mon May 06 11:53:25 EDT 2019
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Physical exercise
Human
squats
Space flight
Hypergravity
Space Cycle
space
spaceflight
Vertebrata
Mammalia
human centrifuge
Microgravity
Gravity
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c479t-2741c6a0ee7d40f91d5b6574b2ba71f5e13a1e31bc469846de81dd90770b7dca3
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
PMID 17872403
PQID 222225566
PQPubID 40905
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68442337
proquest_miscellaneous_20502880
highwire_physiology_jap_103_5_1879
proquest_journals_222225566
pascalfrancis_primary_19214086
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007
pubmed_primary_17872403
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Bethesda, MD
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bethesda, MD
– name: United States
– name: Bethesda
PublicationTitle Journal of applied physiology (1985)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Appl Physiol (1985)
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Am Physiological Soc
American Physiological Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Physiological Soc
– name: American Physiological Society
References R40
R21
R20
R23
R22
R25
R24
R27
R26
R29
R28
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R30
R10
R32
R31
R12
R34
R11
R33
R14
R36
R13
R35
R16
R38
R15
R37
R18
R17
R39
R19
References_xml – ident: R13
– ident: R27
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00039-3
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.7
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00043-5
– ident: R39
  doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09198.x
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000058367.66796.35
– ident: R26
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00027
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00115-5
– ident: R36
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062166
– ident: R38
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00028-9
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1308-x
– ident: R35
– ident: R25
  doi: 10.1249/00003677-199600240-00014
– ident: R9
– ident: R37
– ident: R12
– ident: R31
  doi: 10.1097/00006842-200111000-00003
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01293.x
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-199811000-00010
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1007/s002210100706
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.1139/h05-103
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01457.x
– ident: R22
– ident: R29
– ident: R33
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101014
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003
– ident: R28
  doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040307
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-199704000-00016
– ident: R2
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1172-8
– ident: R32
– ident: R11
– ident: R21
  doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00101-1
– ident: R30
– ident: R15
– ident: R8
– ident: R17
– ident: R34
– ident: R40
  doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00100-X
SSID ssj0014451
Score 2.0321062
Snippet Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California,...
The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM)...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1879
SubjectTerms Adult
Ankle Joint - physiology
Arthrometry, Articular
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Centrifugation
Comparative analysis
Electromyography
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Feasibility Studies
Female
Foot - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hip Joint - physiology
Humans
Hypergravity
Joints
Knee Joint - physiology
Male
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscles
Muscular system
Physical training
Range of Motion, Articular
Research Design
Space Flight
Studies
Weightlessness
Weightlessness Countermeasures
Weightlessness Simulation
Title Hypergravity resistance exercise: the use of artificial gravity as potential countermeasure to microgravity
URI http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/5/1879
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17872403
https://www.proquest.com/docview/222225566
https://www.proquest.com/docview/20502880
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68442337
Volume 103
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELeqISFeEGx8hMGwEOIFZeTDjhPeBgIqBAiJTtqeLCexJQRtqjZ9gH-Nf4672E5SWDVGH6IqsZ3E97N9dzn_jpCnKtNppkoT5sywkNVCh0VRs7DSCasTo2JhugDZT9n0lL0_42eTya9R1NKmLY-rnxfuK_kfqcI5kCvukr2CZPtG4QT8B_nCESQMx3-S8RSMyBUmEEJVGuxm1AVxoPo8Sj5oY2Md9tiCI4zwldT6-bJpMWKo4wnZYDfPrdsQtdI5huu5sjvUWOXU2M5FYgmdkPupyPnIyXDuvNLnX82AxlfKRXSMQ_ft5u2OKfIL0kb4kx_Uyu0N8_E4W_4K4Tbu9dMaGEhRCFaKXWa1m3bBJI4zV8zPy1E6AiAfzbKYIX20Yse5bezv1YAnXRYC6AjXCciULjr-UTEsgP6j_x_rYh-t2NlJPJHjhmTXkLRMBtcSIboYgXdnfXxRjMxv1rlsX9cFF0JDL3Y80bZq5OmqMVpXrWHAGptpZbcp1KlEs1vkpgMBPbHAvE0merFPDk4Wqm3mP-gz-rmHxD65_tEFcRyQb2PY0gG21MP2JQXQUgAtbQwdQEt9FbWmPWjpNmhp29AxaO-Q07dvZq-nocv5EVZMFG2IbEpVpiKtRc0iU8Q1LzMuWJmUSsSG6zhVsU7jssLUpyyrNRhcdQF9GJWirlR6l-wtmoW-T6iC66IQysRZznRW5qmJjC5NUZdcV3kVkMx3t6wcIT7mZfkuLxF4QKK-4tJywlxe5djLUw7jUaKbaQZgw2oAd8klQlsuaxOQJxdVgHJyKBiQoy1oDE9TJDGL8iwghx4r0s1ba5ngj4MZF5DH_VVYVPBLoVroZgNFIg52Rx7tLgFdCoZYCi92z0JwuDeoAEjy-eDqvXRIbgwzxkOy1642-hHo_G151I2t389WC_o
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hypergravity+resistance+exercise%3A+the+use+of+artificial+gravity+as+potential+countermeasure+to+microgravity&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=Yang%2C+Yifan&rft.au=Baker%2C+Michael&rft.au=Graf%2C+Scott&rft.au=Larson%2C+Jennifer&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1879&rft.epage=1887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00772.2007&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon