Hypergravity resistance exercise: the use of artificial gravity as potential countermeasure to microgravity
Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California Submitted 16 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007 The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravi...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 103; no. 5; pp. 1879 - 1887 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bethesda, MD
Am Physiological Soc
01.11.2007
American Physiological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
Submitted 16 July 2007
; accepted in final form 13 September 2007
The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2 ) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.
Space Cycle; squats; space; spaceflight; human centrifuge
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. J. Caiozzo, Medical Sciences I B-152, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Univ. of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: vjcaiozz{at}uci.edu ) |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G... condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G...). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G... In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California Submitted 16 July 2007 ; accepted in final form 13 September 2007 The aims of this study were to 1 ) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2 ) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. Space Cycle; squats; space; spaceflight; human centrifuge Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. J. Caiozzo, Medical Sciences I B-152, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Univ. of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: vjcaiozz{at}uci.edu ) The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G sub(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G sub(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G sub(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G z condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25–3.75 G z ). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G z . In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity.The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM) squats using weights under normal 1-G(z) condition, and 2) compare the kinematics (duration and goniometry) and EMG activities of selected joints and muscles between 10RM and HG squats of similar total foot forces. Eight men and six women [27 yr (SD 4), 66 kg (SD 10)] completed ten 10RM [83 kg (SD 23)] and 10 HG squats (2.25-3.75 G(z)). HG squats were performed on a human-powered short-arm centrifuge. Foot forces were measured using insole force sensors. Hip, knee, and ankle angles were measured using electrogoniometers. EMG activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius were also recorded during both squats. All subjects were able to achieve similar or higher average total foot forces during HG squats compared with those obtained during 10RM squats. There were no differences in total duration per set, average duration per repetition, and goniometry and EMG activities of the selected joints and muscles, respectively, between 10RM and HG squats. These results demonstrate that HG squats can produce very high foot forces that are comparable to those produced during 10RM squats at 1 G(z). In addition, the technique and muscle activation are similar between the two types of squats. This observation supports the view that HG resistance training may represent an important countermeasure to microgravity. |
Author | Baker, Michael Larson, Jennifer Caiozzo, Vincent J Yang, Yifan Graf, Scott |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Yang, Yifan – sequence: 2 fullname: Baker, Michael – sequence: 3 fullname: Graf, Scott – sequence: 4 fullname: Larson, Jennifer – sequence: 5 fullname: Caiozzo, Vincent J |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19214086$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17872403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkVFr1TAYhoNM3Nn0L2gRFLzoMUmTphW8kLE5YeDNvA5p-vWcHHOamqS6_nvTnY4jA9HcfJA8zwd53zN00rseEHpF8JoQTt_v1DDYYTsF4-waYyHomqbxBK3SK81JickJWlWC41zwSpyisxB2GBPGOHmGTomoBGW4WKHv19MAfuPVTxOnzEMwIapeQwZ34LUJ8CGLW8jGAJnrMuWj6Yw2ymYPigrZ4CL0cb7Ubuwj-D2oMHrIosv2Rnu3sM_R007ZAC-WeY6-XV3eXlznN18_f7n4dJNrJuqYU8GILhUGEC3DXU1a3pRcsIY2SpCOAykUgYI0mpV1xcoWKtK2dQoBN6LVqjhHbw97B-9-jBCi3JugwVrVgxuDLCvGaFGIf4IUc0yrCifw9SNw50bfp09IOh_OyzJBLxdobPbQysGbvfKTfAg7AW8WQAWtbOdT0CYcuZoShqt5kThwKboQPHRHBMu5fvln_fK-fjnXn8yPj0xtoorG9dErY__Df3fwt2az_WU8yAVym2mW0oJCckkqUSeW_529Gq29hbs4S0dHDm1X_AZX2t7J |
CODEN | JAPHEV |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_011_2083_0 crossref_primary_10_1096_fj_202201781R crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_1024389 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2018_01492 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12217_024_10124_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actaastro_2019_03_006 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_16034 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2018_01759 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reach_2019_100030 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00314_2019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12576_016_0514_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reach_2016_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00499_2009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bone_2015_12_057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actaastro_2010_06_032 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP089734 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_644661 crossref_primary_10_1134_S0362119717050127 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_91130_2008 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu4122047 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00039-3 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.7 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00043-5 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09198.x 10.1249/01.MSS.0000058367.66796.35 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00027 10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00115-5 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062166 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00028-9 10.1007/s00421-004-1308-x 10.1249/00003677-199600240-00014 10.1097/00006842-200111000-00003 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01293.x 10.1097/00005768-199811000-00010 10.1007/s002210100706 10.1139/h05-103 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01457.x 10.1002/jbmr.5650101014 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003 10.1359/JBMR.040307 10.1097/00005768-199704000-00016 10.1007/s00421-004-1172-8 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00101-1 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00100-X |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2007 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Physiological Society Nov 2007 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Physiological Society Nov 2007 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Technology Research Database Physical Education Index MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1601 |
EndPage | 1887 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1380100201 17872403 19214086 10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007 jap_103_5_1879 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Feature |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: M01-RR-00827 |
GroupedDBID | - 02 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 55 5VS 85S AALRV ABFLS ABOCM ABUFD ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV ADBIT AEILP AENEX AEULQ AFDAS AFRAH AGCDD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP GX1 H13 H~9 KQ8 L7B MYA NEJ O0- OHT OK1 P-O P2P PQEST PQQKQ RAP RHF RHI RPL SJN UHB UKR UPT WH7 WOQ X X7M YCJ --- -~X .55 .GJ 18M 1CY 29J 3O- 8M5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABCQX ABDNZ ABHWK ABJNI ABKWE ACBEA ACGFO ACKIV ACYGS ADFNX ADXHL AETEA AFOSN AGNAY AI. AIDAL AJUXI BKKCC BTFSW C2- CITATION EMOBN ITBOX J5H MVM P6G RPRKH TR2 VH1 W8F XOL XSW YBH YQJ YQT YWH ZXP ~02 IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-2741c6a0ee7d40f91d5b6574b2ba71f5e13a1e31bc469846de81dd90770b7dca3 |
ISSN | 8750-7587 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 21:13:18 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 09:40:37 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:36:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:09:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:13:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 05 17:53:18 EST 2021 Mon May 06 11:53:25 EDT 2019 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Physical exercise Human squats Space flight Hypergravity Space Cycle space spaceflight Vertebrata Mammalia human centrifuge Microgravity Gravity |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c479t-2741c6a0ee7d40f91d5b6574b2ba71f5e13a1e31bc469846de81dd90770b7dca3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
PMID | 17872403 |
PQID | 222225566 |
PQPubID | 40905 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68442337 proquest_miscellaneous_20502880 highwire_physiology_jap_103_5_1879 proquest_journals_222225566 pascalfrancis_primary_19214086 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007 pubmed_primary_17872403 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2007-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2007 text: 2007-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Bethesda, MD |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bethesda, MD – name: United States – name: Bethesda |
PublicationTitle | Journal of applied physiology (1985) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Appl Physiol (1985) |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | Am Physiological Soc American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Physiological Soc – name: American Physiological Society |
References | R40 R21 R20 R23 R22 R25 R24 R27 R26 R29 R28 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R30 R10 R32 R31 R12 R34 R11 R33 R14 R36 R13 R35 R16 R38 R15 R37 R18 R17 R39 R19 |
References_xml | – ident: R13 – ident: R27 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00039-3 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.7 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00043-5 – ident: R39 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09198.x – ident: R3 doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000058367.66796.35 – ident: R26 – ident: R24 doi: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00027 – ident: R19 doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00115-5 – ident: R36 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062166 – ident: R38 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00028-9 – ident: R20 doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1308-x – ident: R35 – ident: R25 doi: 10.1249/00003677-199600240-00014 – ident: R9 – ident: R37 – ident: R12 – ident: R31 doi: 10.1097/00006842-200111000-00003 – ident: R4 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01293.x – ident: R23 doi: 10.1097/00005768-199811000-00010 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1007/s002210100706 – ident: R6 doi: 10.1139/h05-103 – ident: R16 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2005.01457.x – ident: R22 – ident: R29 – ident: R33 doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101014 – ident: R1 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003 – ident: R28 doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040307 – ident: R18 doi: 10.1097/00005768-199704000-00016 – ident: R2 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1172-8 – ident: R32 – ident: R11 – ident: R21 doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00101-1 – ident: R30 – ident: R15 – ident: R8 – ident: R17 – ident: R34 – ident: R40 doi: 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00100-X |
SSID | ssj0014451 |
Score | 2.0321062 |
Snippet | Departments of 1 Orthopedic Surgery and of 2 Physiology and Biophysics and 3 General Clinical Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California,... The aims of this study were to 1) determine if hypergravity (HG) squats can produce foot forces similar to those measured during 10-repetition maximum (10RM)... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1879 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Ankle Joint - physiology Arthrometry, Articular Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Centrifugation Comparative analysis Electromyography Exercise Exercise - physiology Feasibility Studies Female Foot - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hip Joint - physiology Humans Hypergravity Joints Knee Joint - physiology Male Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Muscles Muscular system Physical training Range of Motion, Articular Research Design Space Flight Studies Weightlessness Weightlessness Countermeasures Weightlessness Simulation |
Title | Hypergravity resistance exercise: the use of artificial gravity as potential countermeasure to microgravity |
URI | http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/5/1879 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17872403 https://www.proquest.com/docview/222225566 https://www.proquest.com/docview/20502880 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68442337 |
Volume | 103 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELeqISFeEGx8hMGwEOIFZeTDjhPeBgIqBAiJTtqeLCexJQRtqjZ9gH-Nf4672E5SWDVGH6IqsZ3E97N9dzn_jpCnKtNppkoT5sywkNVCh0VRs7DSCasTo2JhugDZT9n0lL0_42eTya9R1NKmLY-rnxfuK_kfqcI5kCvukr2CZPtG4QT8B_nCESQMx3-S8RSMyBUmEEJVGuxm1AVxoPo8Sj5oY2Md9tiCI4zwldT6-bJpMWKo4wnZYDfPrdsQtdI5huu5sjvUWOXU2M5FYgmdkPupyPnIyXDuvNLnX82AxlfKRXSMQ_ft5u2OKfIL0kb4kx_Uyu0N8_E4W_4K4Tbu9dMaGEhRCFaKXWa1m3bBJI4zV8zPy1E6AiAfzbKYIX20Yse5bezv1YAnXRYC6AjXCciULjr-UTEsgP6j_x_rYh-t2NlJPJHjhmTXkLRMBtcSIboYgXdnfXxRjMxv1rlsX9cFF0JDL3Y80bZq5OmqMVpXrWHAGptpZbcp1KlEs1vkpgMBPbHAvE0merFPDk4Wqm3mP-gz-rmHxD65_tEFcRyQb2PY0gG21MP2JQXQUgAtbQwdQEt9FbWmPWjpNmhp29AxaO-Q07dvZq-nocv5EVZMFG2IbEpVpiKtRc0iU8Q1LzMuWJmUSsSG6zhVsU7jssLUpyyrNRhcdQF9GJWirlR6l-wtmoW-T6iC66IQysRZznRW5qmJjC5NUZdcV3kVkMx3t6wcIT7mZfkuLxF4QKK-4tJywlxe5djLUw7jUaKbaQZgw2oAd8klQlsuaxOQJxdVgHJyKBiQoy1oDE9TJDGL8iwghx4r0s1ba5ngj4MZF5DH_VVYVPBLoVroZgNFIg52Rx7tLgFdCoZYCi92z0JwuDeoAEjy-eDqvXRIbgwzxkOy1642-hHo_G151I2t389WC_o |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hypergravity+resistance+exercise%3A+the+use+of+artificial+gravity+as+potential+countermeasure+to+microgravity&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=Yang%2C+Yifan&rft.au=Baker%2C+Michael&rft.au=Graf%2C+Scott&rft.au=Larson%2C+Jennifer&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1879&rft.epage=1887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00772.2007&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1152_japplphysiol_00772_2007 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |