Transcriptional Profiles from Paired Normal Samples Offer Complementary Information on Cancer Patient Survival – Evidence from TCGA Pan-Cancer Data

Although normal tissue samples adjacent to tumors are sometimes collected from patients in cancer studies, they are often used as normal controls to identify genes differentially expressed between tumor and normal samples. However, it is in general more difficult to obtain and clearly define paired...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 20567
Main Authors Huang, Xiu, Stern, David F., Zhao, Hongyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 03.02.2016
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although normal tissue samples adjacent to tumors are sometimes collected from patients in cancer studies, they are often used as normal controls to identify genes differentially expressed between tumor and normal samples. However, it is in general more difficult to obtain and clearly define paired normal samples and whether these samples should be treated as “normal” due to their close proximity to tumors. In this article, by analyzing the accrued data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we show the surprising results that the paired normal samples are in general more informative on patient survival than tumors. Different lines of evidence suggest that this is likely due to tumor micro-environment instead of tumor cell contamination or field cancerization effect. Pathway analyses suggest that tumor micro-environment may play an important role in cancer patient survival either by boosting the adjacent metabolism or the in situ immunization. Our results suggest the potential benefit of collecting and profiling matched normal tissues to gain more insights on disease etiology and patient progression.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep20567