Use and outcomes of emergent laparoscopic resection for acute diverticulitis

Abstract Background The use and outcomes of laparoscopic sigmoid resection during emergency admissions for diverticulitis are unknown. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for colorectal resections performed for diverticulitis during emergent hospital admissions (2003–2007). Univariat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 203; no. 5; pp. 639 - 643
Main Authors Rea, Jennifer D., M.D, Herzig, Daniel O., M.D, Diggs, Brian S., Ph.D, Cone, Molly M., M.D, Lu, Kim C., M.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.05.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The use and outcomes of laparoscopic sigmoid resection during emergency admissions for diverticulitis are unknown. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for colorectal resections performed for diverticulitis during emergent hospital admissions (2003–2007). Univariate and multivariate analyses including patient, hospital, and outcome variables were performed. Results A national estimate of 67,645 resections (4% laparoscopic) was evaluated. The rate of conversion to open operation was 55%. Ostomies were created in 66% of patients, 67% open and 41% laparoscopic. Laparoscopy was not a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR] =.70; confidence interval [CI], .32–1.53). Laparoscopy predicted routine discharge (OR = 1.31; CI, 1.06–1.63) and a decreased length of stay (absolute days = −.78; CI, −1.19 to −.37). There was no difference in the cost of hospitalization between the 2 groups ( P = .45). Conclusions In acute diverticulitis, urgent laparoscopic resection decreases the length of stay. However, it is associated with a high conversion rate, no cost savings, and no difference in mortality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.004