Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments
Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental impact. The objective of this research was to compare assessments of the environmental impact of livestock products. Twenty-five peer-reviewed s...
Saved in:
| Published in | Livestock science Vol. 128; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.03.2010
Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental impact. The objective of this research was to compare assessments of the environmental impact of livestock products. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies were found that assessed the impact of production of pork, chicken, beef, milk, and eggs using life cycle analysis (LCA). Only 16 of these studies were reviewed, based on five criteria: study from an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) country, non-organic production, type of LCA methodology, allocation method used, and definition of system boundary. LCA results of these 16 studies were expressed in three ways: per kg product, per kg protein, and per kg of average daily intake of each product for an OECD country. The review yielded a consistent ranging of results for use of land and energy, and for climate change. No clear pattern was found, however, for eutrophication and acidification. Production of 1
kg of beef used most land and energy, and had highest global warming potential (GWP), followed by production of 1
kg of pork, chicken, eggs, and milk. Differences in environmental impact among pork, chicken, and beef can be explained mainly by 3 factors: differences in feed efficiency, differences in enteric CH
4 emission between monogastric animals and ruminants, and differences in reproduction rates. The impact of production of 1
kg of meat (pork, chicken, beef) was high compared with production of 1
kg of milk and eggs because of the relatively high water content of milk and eggs. Production of 1
kg of beef protein also had the highest impact, followed by pork protein, whereas chicken protein had the lowest impact. This result also explained why consumption of beef was responsible for the largest part of the land use and GWP in an average OECD diet. This review did not show consistent differences in environmental impact per kg protein in milk, pork, chicken and eggs. Only one study compared environmental impact of meat versus milk and eggs. Conclusions regarding impact of pork or chicken versus impact of milk or eggs require additional comparative studies and further harmonization of LCA methodology. Interpretation of current LCA results for livestock products, moreover, is hindered because results do not include environmental consequences of competition for land between humans and animals, and consequences of land-use changes. We recommend, therefore, to include these consequences in future LCAs of livestock products. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental impact. The objective of this research was to compare assessments of the environmental impact of livestock products. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies were found that assessed the impact of production of pork, chicken, beef, milk, and eggs using life cycle analysis (LCA). Only 16 of these studies were reviewed, based on five criteria: study from an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) country, non-organic production, type of LCA methodology, allocation method used, and definition of system boundary. LCA results of these 16 studies were expressed in three ways: per kg product, per kg protein, and per kg of average daily intake of each product for an OECD country. The review yielded a consistent ranging of results for use of land and energy, and for climate change. No clear pattern was found, however, for eutrophication and acidification. Production of 1
kg of beef used most land and energy, and had highest global warming potential (GWP), followed by production of 1
kg of pork, chicken, eggs, and milk. Differences in environmental impact among pork, chicken, and beef can be explained mainly by 3 factors: differences in feed efficiency, differences in enteric CH
4 emission between monogastric animals and ruminants, and differences in reproduction rates. The impact of production of 1
kg of meat (pork, chicken, beef) was high compared with production of 1
kg of milk and eggs because of the relatively high water content of milk and eggs. Production of 1
kg of beef protein also had the highest impact, followed by pork protein, whereas chicken protein had the lowest impact. This result also explained why consumption of beef was responsible for the largest part of the land use and GWP in an average OECD diet. This review did not show consistent differences in environmental impact per kg protein in milk, pork, chicken and eggs. Only one study compared environmental impact of meat versus milk and eggs. Conclusions regarding impact of pork or chicken versus impact of milk or eggs require additional comparative studies and further harmonization of LCA methodology. Interpretation of current LCA results for livestock products, moreover, is hindered because results do not include environmental consequences of competition for land between humans and animals, and consequences of land-use changes. We recommend, therefore, to include these consequences in future LCAs of livestock products. Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental impact. The objective of this research was to compare assessments of the environmental impact of livestock products. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies were found that assessed the impact of production of pork, chicken, beef, milk, and eggs using life cycle analysis (LCA). Only 16 of these studies were reviewed, based on five criteria: study from an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) country, non-organic production, type of LCA methodology, allocation method used, and definition of system boundary. LCA results of these 16 studies were expressed in three ways: per kg product, per kg protein, and per kg of average daily intake of each product for an OECD country. The review yielded a consistent ranging of results for use of land and energy, and for climate change. No clear pattern was found, however, for eutrophication and acidification. Production of 1kg of beef used most land and energy, and had highest global warming potential (GWP), followed by production of 1kg of pork, chicken, eggs, and milk. Differences in environmental impact among pork, chicken, and beef can be explained mainly by 3 factors: differences in feed efficiency, differences in enteric CH₄ emission between monogastric animals and ruminants, and differences in reproduction rates. The impact of production of 1kg of meat (pork, chicken, beef) was high compared with production of 1kg of milk and eggs because of the relatively high water content of milk and eggs. Production of 1kg of beef protein also had the highest impact, followed by pork protein, whereas chicken protein had the lowest impact. This result also explained why consumption of beef was responsible for the largest part of the land use and GWP in an average OECD diet. This review did not show consistent differences in environmental impact per kg protein in milk, pork, chicken and eggs. Only one study compared environmental impact of meat versus milk and eggs. Conclusions regarding impact of pork or chicken versus impact of milk or eggs require additional comparative studies and further harmonization of LCA methodology. Interpretation of current LCA results for livestock products, moreover, is hindered because results do not include environmental consequences of competition for land between humans and animals, and consequences of land-use changes. We recommend, therefore, to include these consequences in future LCAs of livestock products. Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental impact. The objective of this research was to compare assessments of the environmental impact of livestock products. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies were found that assessed the impact of production of pork, chicken, beef, milk, and eggs using life cycle analysis (LCA). Only 16 of these studies were reviewed, based on five criteria: study from an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) country, non-organic production, type of LCA methodology, allocation method used, and definition of system boundary. LCA results of these 16 studies were expressed in three ways: per kg product, per kg protein, and per kg of average daily intake of each product for an OECD country. The review yielded a consistent ranging of results for use of land and energy, and for climate change. No clear pattern was found, however, for eutrophication and acidification. Production of 1 kg of beef used most land and energy, and had highest global warming potential (GWP), followed by production of 1 kg of pork, chicken, eggs, and milk. Differences in environmental impact among pork, chicken, and beef can be explained mainly by 3 factors: differences in feed efficiency, differences in enteric CH4 emission between monogastric animals and ruminants, and differences in reproduction rates. The impact of production of 1 kg of meat (pork, chicken, beef) was high compared with production of 1 kg of milk and eggs because of the relatively high water content of milk and eggs. Production of 1 kg of beef protein also had the highest impact, followed by pork protein, whereas chicken protein had the lowest impact. This result also explained why consumption of beef was responsible for the largest part of the land use and GWP in an average OECD diet. This review did not show consistent differences in environmental impact per kg protein in milk, pork, chicken and eggs. Only one study compared environmental impact of meat versus milk and eggs. Conclusions regarding impact of pork or chicken versus impact of milk or eggs require additional comparative studies and further harmonization of LCA methodology. Interpretation of current LCA results for livestock products, moreover, is hindered because results do not include environmental consequences of competition for land between humans and animals, and consequences of land-use changes. We recommend, therefore, to include these consequences in future LCAs of livestock products |
| Author | de Vries, M. de Boer, I.J.M. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: M. surname: de Vries fullname: de Vries, M. – sequence: 2 givenname: I.J.M. surname: de Boer fullname: de Boer, I.J.M. email: Imke.deBoer@wur.nl |
| BookMark | eNqFUU1v1DAQjVCRaAv_AAmfuCWdWTux0wNSteKjUiUO0AsXy3EmKy9Ze7GTXfXf4xAENzjNaPzeG795V8WFD56K4jVChYDNzb4a3SlZV20A2gqxApDPiktUUpUgWrj41WOJAvmL4iqlPUAthBKXxbdtOBxNdH7HyJ9cDP5AfjIjc3lsp8SGEFlWpzQF-50dY-jnPL5ldyzSydGZhSG_D8Tskx2JmZQopUUjvSyeD2ZM9Op3vS4eP7z_uv1UPnz-eL-9eyitkGoqeQeGJBdEG1kLUq0ypmtQtkZ20HfcwgC8bjaCI_BmEEMDSKbn1EpTc275dXG76p7Njnx2Ql57E61LOhinR9dFE5_0eY7aj0s5zl3SXCmOTSa_XcnZ2Y85u9QHlyyNo_EU5qRFU3OUjcxAsQJtDClFGvQxusMijKCXFPRerynoJQWNqHMKfz_3h2bdZCYX_BSNG_9HfrOSBxO02cXs6PHLBpADKqixVRnxbkVQPnCOI-qsQd5S7yLZSffB_XvFT3uDtCk |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_15598276211008127 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani5020361 crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2021_2003726 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_16823 crossref_primary_10_2527_af_2011_0009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_algal_2023_103185 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_12_074 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_012_0521_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystemseng_2020_07_015 crossref_primary_10_2527_af_2011_0008 crossref_primary_10_3390_su152215688 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN22297 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2022_982572 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_020_10216_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2011_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0182960 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriengineering6040271 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731114002134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2014_03_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_12_084 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_environ_102017_025957 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12102065 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2012_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0051145 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12229442 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_4293 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_08_125 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13137075 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_177644 crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12291 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2019_00030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2016_08_012 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14162435 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2012_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_4162_12051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2014_04_102 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_environ_031113_093503 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2016_01_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_117752 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_013_0401_2 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aa6cd5 crossref_primary_10_54175_hsustain1020008 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture15030235 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151612210 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2020_00113 crossref_primary_10_2527_af_2011_0012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_024_05872_z crossref_primary_10_2527_af_2011_0016 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731114002110 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2021_01_086 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN23352 crossref_primary_10_1093_ajae_aav047 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_07_240 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_122137 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007114516000763 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2020_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2024_139360 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2015_06_020 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods13203227 crossref_primary_10_1002_fes3_143 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_07_199 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_05_226 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13114170 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_09_116 crossref_primary_10_4081_ija_2022_2017 crossref_primary_10_1017_S175173112000138X crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2020_596869 crossref_primary_10_1021_es4025113 crossref_primary_10_3390_min8030114 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12060793 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani7030025 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1421941112 crossref_primary_10_1080_00379271_2015_1122911 crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2020_0064 crossref_primary_10_1080_14735903_2020_1824419 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_019_00450_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_112433 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2012_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN14687 crossref_primary_10_2478_aoas_2023_0074 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2011_4545 crossref_primary_10_3390_su3122443 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_138939 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_143 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_020_01723_5 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731111000437 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_01_329 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aacc75 crossref_primary_10_1002_aepp_13350 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2015_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2014_07_008 crossref_primary_10_1089_ind_2020_29232_tzs crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2021_0064 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2021_100283 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN14210 crossref_primary_10_3390_pr10122684 crossref_primary_10_3390_su9112003 crossref_primary_10_3390_en16062770 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2017_05_173 crossref_primary_10_1093_aepp_ppx054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2011_12_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2024_10_014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_015_0896_9 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170513000471 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2095_3119_14_60891_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14105988 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11236592 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2012_10_035 crossref_primary_10_4081_ijas_2012_e20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2020_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cnd_2016_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_10704 crossref_primary_10_1515_boku_2016_0009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_137829 crossref_primary_10_5304_jafscd_2020_094_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12726 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_10_189 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_021_18372_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10457_024_01028_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_016_0392_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_su152316303 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13020650 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN23300 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14031741 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_09_039 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0144601 crossref_primary_10_3390_en15238867 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_671183 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12313 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2022_22211 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2021_103282 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0118785 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13193132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcradv_2023_200183 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2019_104876 crossref_primary_10_1080_23308249_2024_2337426 crossref_primary_10_3390_w11122546 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11102747 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10072393 crossref_primary_10_3390_su142316042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_015_0944_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2014_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_23308249_2024_2315049 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731119000351 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2015_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1080_00071668_2024_2409192 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2800 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0173131 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsus_2024_1416964 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2021_103063 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_57623_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meatsci_2015_05_013 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12202732 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2025_104276 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2023_1151801 crossref_primary_10_3390_su9071236 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_150528 crossref_primary_10_13050_foodengprog_2019_23_1_62 crossref_primary_10_1080_21655979_2019_1679697 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aaq0216 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2024_102853 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2015_02_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_05_078 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_013_0633_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2018_01_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2018_01_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gfs_2020_100367 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2024_102675 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_118667 crossref_primary_10_1002_fee_1822 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2019_101978 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2020_101845 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpe_2016_08_034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2023_113322 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_020_02979_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2013_05_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2015_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1071_RJ17035 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture5041252 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2012_07_008 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10103796 crossref_primary_10_1017_S2040470014000533 crossref_primary_10_17221_288_2020_CJFS crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2024_105255 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_125784 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_123046 crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP12727 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aabd45 crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2017_0006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2012_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1093_erae_jbw013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_japr_2020_10_009 crossref_primary_10_2508_chikusan_94_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_ppl_13532 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_133441 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_105068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_121900 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_01_039 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202233500004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2018_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2020_100024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2011_04_058 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ace204 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11071008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2011_04_055 crossref_primary_10_1093_af_vfab043 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2353919 crossref_primary_10_1186_2041_7136_4_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10115 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature13959 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2012_11_013 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy11020371 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_11_11_113002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2022_e09006 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0021859614000690 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2020_106882 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_315_2_022096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_133586 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_019_00523_0 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_024_01227_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40813_023_00347_5 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170515000071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaeng_2020_102130 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_015_9566_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2012_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_04449_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2019_103731 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_12_008 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skae225 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10113827 crossref_primary_10_1108_00346651311327873 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_012_9426_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_05_057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2015_02_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cesys_2023_100146 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_12_139 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_013_0618_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biotechadv_2023_108145 crossref_primary_10_17660_eJHS_2020_85_5_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2013_05_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_su9091615 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_018_1486_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2018_09_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_02_074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_138170 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11947_023_03195_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2023_107212 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2020_104119 crossref_primary_10_4236_health_2019_1110098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2020_119252 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_11_027 crossref_primary_10_30910_turkjans_1393891 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2014_08_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2017_02_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2016_02_012 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12145669 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aaf_2024_06_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_06_284 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_02_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2020_102842 crossref_primary_10_1093_nutrit_nuad055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atech_2024_100704 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_023_00945_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meatsci_2014_07_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2024_107779 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_10_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2016_06_038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2017_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2024_103745 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2017_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40710_023_00650_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120974 crossref_primary_10_1002_ghg_1785 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2023_06_018 crossref_primary_10_1080_00439339_2021_1960234 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2017_05_011 crossref_primary_10_3390_w7116190 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731114000548 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14106028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2014_10_061 crossref_primary_10_4081_ijas_2014_3155 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_118241 crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_12610 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2021_102343 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10098_019_01777_y crossref_primary_10_1016_S2095_6339_15_30026_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_cvr_cvab173 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14111595 crossref_primary_10_1080_14735903_2013_798896 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2014_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2017_06_071 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_03941_3 crossref_primary_10_33245_2310_9289_2023_178_1_145_158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gfs_2022_100656 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules27206963 crossref_primary_10_1039_C7EN01166K crossref_primary_10_1007_s11428_015_1377_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107206 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2013_01_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coesh_2021_100276 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2011_4360 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00038_013_0484_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_013_0638_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_09_054 crossref_primary_10_1093_aesa_saz033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_105678 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2024_104295 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_121409 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2018_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2024_109411 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2021_104622 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_11_140 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2015_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2011_11_039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_11_099 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_04_081 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_04_082 crossref_primary_10_3775_jie_101_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_07_279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_10_059 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1753_5131_2012_01080_x crossref_primary_10_3390_su10114089 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods10030482 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12092745 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_93284_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11010451 crossref_primary_10_1002_bbb_276 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151511688 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2017_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2012_08_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani2020108 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods8080301 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2019_16576 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN15579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_03_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2019_05_022 crossref_primary_10_1080_09669582_2019_1670187 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_11_134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meatsci_2017_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN15586 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11113190 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593330_2015_1024758 crossref_primary_10_1080_00207233_2022_2042970 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2014_8310 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1084_1_012042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_016_1033_9 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731113000748 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matpr_2021_06_208 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_01_080 crossref_primary_10_1038_nclimate2925 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120306 crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2018_0003 crossref_primary_10_2478_ebtj_2021_0022 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11236866 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2016_12_006 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture8120200 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10584_014_1169_1 crossref_primary_10_2527_jas_2013_6585 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrurstud_2017_12_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_021_01980_4 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043933915002433 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1530_9290_2012_00476_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinsphys_2014_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_85_1_012015 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0029665116000094 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2014_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eti_2024_103549 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2023_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_159018 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_59795_6 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pev323 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_024_32541_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_su132011368 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12176729 crossref_primary_10_1111_grs_12054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cofs_2022_100967 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_01_037 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2014_9212 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16104229 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_03_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16031041 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2017_00206 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_160014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_11_160 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13137399 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2011_04_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_11_241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_promfg_2020_01_206 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0167343 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13010083 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40888_019_00168_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fanim_2021_760310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2014_07_009 crossref_primary_10_15547_ast_2021_03_038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_10_072 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coesh_2018_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_126192 crossref_primary_10_3390_pr7110818 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731116000902 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2013_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_0c08359 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2016_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_132816 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_012_0446_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajae_12016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_086 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10584_012_0593_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_f8110429 crossref_primary_10_5851_kosfa_2024_e109 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2022_102151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_084 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_023_00901_z crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1308149110 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1402183111 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2024_0675 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_05_024 crossref_primary_10_1515_znc_2017_0033 crossref_primary_10_1093_qopen_qoad002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_127177 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2023_102667 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2018_00058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_143880 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12233306 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191811653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2021_103328 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2019_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_promfg_2019_06_113 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_7202 crossref_primary_10_1002_ieam_1458 crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2018_1423581 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2014_8284 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_habitatint_2018_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2014_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_12_267 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_16996_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15061327 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_159103 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_02_043 crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_122_026318 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_algal_2016_09_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2022_102586 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2024_25044 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43016_022_00658_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2018_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_017_1300_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_125009 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture10120599 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_40899_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2023_102887 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijfs_17466 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2013_03_064 crossref_primary_10_2527_jas_2012_5824 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11250_023_03748_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13116048 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_12591 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0189029 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2018_00008 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods10122941 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_12_030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2024_104067 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2017_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_17583004_2022_2039301 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_07_132 crossref_primary_10_1186_2193_2409_1_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_pts_2135 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijcfm_ijcfm_123_20 crossref_primary_10_1002_fee_2636 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_10_035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_06_051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2021_112288 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41130_020_00124_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_156267 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2023_02_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11236692 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_2013_03252 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_015_0849_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_022_02307_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13223578 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2016_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpe_2018_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_144720 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2024_104047 crossref_primary_10_1017_S204047001600011X crossref_primary_10_6000_1927_520X_2020_09_17 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c02208 crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems6020047 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_015_0923_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_019_01679_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enbuild_2015_09_012 crossref_primary_10_17221_4_2019_CJFS crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2021_0182 crossref_primary_10_1002_fes3_480 crossref_primary_10_1080_07924259_2024_2330950 crossref_primary_10_1017_S2078633615000259 crossref_primary_10_3390_applmicrobiol5010028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11625_012_0171_7 crossref_primary_10_1139_er_2022_0041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_105224 crossref_primary_10_3390_environments10050073 crossref_primary_10_3917_pour_231_0129 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2011_4439 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00827_19 crossref_primary_10_21323_2414_438X_2021_6_3_242_247 crossref_primary_10_21323_2618_9771_2022_5_3_202_211 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2023_110510 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2021_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2022_106483 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_023_00938_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2020_102806 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2011_03_011 crossref_primary_10_3390_su6020631 crossref_primary_10_35414_akufemubid_1244199 crossref_primary_10_1111_geoj_12256 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_131325 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11121248 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_09_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2011_03_015 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10041078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2011_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_11_143 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2011_03_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2014_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_02_070 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2024_1449054 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10040713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_10_052 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731111001078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_05_027 crossref_primary_10_1177_0030727020915206 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731117001720 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects13030281 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2011_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_04_106 crossref_primary_10_1590_1519_6984_285702 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15031941 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41043_024_00701_5 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4790693 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11226485 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0014445 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17041600 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_152811 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731117000660 crossref_primary_10_4081_ija_2011_6_s2_e7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2024_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2021_100360 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11250_024_03996_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_024_00977_1 crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_1104202012622 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_134863 crossref_primary_10_1038_544S18a crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_016_1071_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_119888 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731115001469 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_017_6174_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2021_664103 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2023_105406 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2025_104898 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14321 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12020627 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2014_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_aff2_23 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_5b03706 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture8100165 crossref_primary_10_1111_1746_692X_12077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2022_100638 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40726_020_00151_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_09_082 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2023_103766 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_08_106 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13165_020_00291_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2021_2022540 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani9030079 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_01_036 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_93782_9 crossref_primary_10_2508_chikusan_94_397 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_024_02382_y crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_333_1_012011 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph15071315 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_014_0777_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2024_143619 crossref_primary_10_1080_26883597_2021_1907214 crossref_primary_10_12952_journal_elementa_000116 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12041586 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10020296 crossref_primary_10_2527_jas_2015_9036 crossref_primary_10_3389_fanim_2021_682477 crossref_primary_10_3945_ajcn_113_071589 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2022_22153 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0021859614000501 crossref_primary_10_1021_es200130u crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_127508 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2012_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvp_2018_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_022_22172_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2022_101745 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2021_100431 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101368 crossref_primary_10_2903_sp_efsa_2022_EN_7316 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2012_761950 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_017_1299_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2024_103970 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_11_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clcb_2021_100001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13165_010_0001_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_12_153 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1304752 crossref_primary_10_1002_nad_12107 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_022_03918_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_00439339_2023_2250326 crossref_primary_10_1002_biuz_201710617 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_145573 crossref_primary_10_1177_1403494819858867 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731114000627 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738264 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_12_082 crossref_primary_10_1111_faf_12077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_137672 crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2022_0062 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12665_015_4777_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10124402 crossref_primary_10_1093_tas_txy086 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11100921 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_11_159 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2019_00026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2013_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2024_105017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aninu_2015_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42690_021_00707_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2016_04_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_toxins16040171 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022029917000322 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_10_113 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_profoo_2015_09_025 crossref_primary_10_3920_JCNS2011_Qpork8 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skab051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seps_2021_101169 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2013_12_027 crossref_primary_10_5367_oa_2016_0229 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10051473 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1321288 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13126551 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_016_1091_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11250_021_02708_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_06_165 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fufo_2021_100088 crossref_primary_10_31648_aspal_8985 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_9_8_084014 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_2011_01634 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2024_103459 crossref_primary_10_2111_REM_D_12_00142_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11061540 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_2011_01635 crossref_primary_10_1002_wcc_421 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13165_014_0090_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_14735903_2017_1353721 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2012_02786_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2015_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_016_1165_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2011_02_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2011_03_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2012_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_05_098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_104924 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2012_09_035 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_018_1465_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2015_03_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2016_00074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2016_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2024_101119 crossref_primary_10_1097_NT_0000000000000286 crossref_primary_10_3920_JIFF2022_0026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_worlddev_2018_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202341702002 crossref_primary_10_2527_jas_2010_3784 crossref_primary_10_1249_FIT_0000000000000136 crossref_primary_10_1093_af_vfac097 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_015_9598_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sjbs_2013_05_001 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2013_7648 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12042142 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_12_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_104948 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpol_2020_103968 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2014_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nexus_2023_100217 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2012_01_077 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_024_01415_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14081304 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_19231_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2016_00027 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_33504_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_11_037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2013_11_027 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12093828 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology9110411 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skx081 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_06_096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indic_2023_100298 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593330_2021_1974577 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2022_08_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_117922 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods9091176 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_03_087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_njas_2013_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_08_199 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13102555 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2016_02_006 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_689259 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2012_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1017_S175173111700324X crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_134508 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2013_7413 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10030453 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_8_4_044044 crossref_primary_10_1071_AN15464 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_131918 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10114184 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_020_11331_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12083415 crossref_primary_10_1080_1943815X_2015_1110186 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_10_11_114004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dib_2022_108244 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2015_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10811_022_02836_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11040948 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2022_127308 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_06_041 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14040609 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10030441 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10705_017_9861_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jafr_2024_101307 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_07_098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_12_259 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_120005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2011_10_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2016_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170798 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2014_12_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_03_048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_05_176 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2024_02_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14213107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122444 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11223712 crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2014_8007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_145932 crossref_primary_10_33188_vetheder_909963 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2013_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12061_020_09344_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos12080945 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_021_17720_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_017_1420_x crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_11_10_105002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_024_12386_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2019_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022GH000737 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph192315756 crossref_primary_10_5194_aab_61_17_2018 crossref_primary_10_3390_su132011230 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cesys_2021_100028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_11_059 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4154485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115563 crossref_primary_10_1080_00071668_2023_2239176 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_01_038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2012_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_020_01860_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_021_01915_z crossref_primary_10_1139_cjas_2023_0077 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_854_1_012021 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00210.x 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00160-2 10.1016/S0306-9192(98)00037-2 10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74426-3 10.1065/lca2007.12.372 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.008 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00322-6 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S 10.2527/2004.8272115x 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007 10.1006/appe.1993.1035 10.1080/00071660600829282 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00510.x 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.008 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00311-X 10.1177/003072709802700406 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.003 10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.002 10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00112-7 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74425-1 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.016 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00579-X 10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00100-6 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.09.006 10.1065/lca2004.06.160 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.011 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.664S 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.525s 10.3168/jds.2006-842 10.22358/jafs/66843/2006 10.1065/lca2006.01.236 10.1007/s11367-008-0007-y 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.017 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.06.001 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2009 Elsevier B.V. Wageningen University & Research |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Wageningen University & Research |
| DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 QVL |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic NARCIS:Publications |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Agriculture |
| EISSN | 1878-0490 |
| EndPage | 11 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_388316 10_1016_j_livsci_2009_11_007 US201301805198 S1871141309003692 |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AABNK AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATLK AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABGRD ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABRWV ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACIUM ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEQOU AESVU AEXOQ AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CBWCG CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LCYCR M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 PC. Q38 QYZTP RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SNL SPCBC SSA SSH SSZ T5K Y6R ~G- ~KM ABPIF ABPTK FBQ AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABJNI ABWVN ACIEU ACMHX ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO ADSLC AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGRNS AGWPP AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION 7S9 L.6 AALMO ADALY IPNFZ QVL |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3b0ae734ee2754e898aab6179a7b0db3c0f03562431036f4f601ead3e97a533c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
| ISSN | 1871-1413 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 13 09:30:02 EDT 2022 Fri Jul 11 08:38:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:15:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:18 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:27:01 EST 2023 Fri Feb 23 02:29:13 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Life cycle assessment Review Environmental impact Eggs Meat Milk |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c478t-3b0ae734ee2754e898aab6179a7b0db3c0f03562431036f4f601ead3e97a533c3 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PQID | 46531767 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_388316 proquest_miscellaneous_46531767 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2009_11_007 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_livsci_2009_11_007 fao_agris_US201301805198 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_livsci_2009_11_007 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-03-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2010 text: 2010-03-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Livestock science |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Elsevier B.V Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V – name: Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier |
| References | Pimentel (bib43) 1992 ISO, 2006. Environmental management. The ISO 14000 family of international standards ISO standard collection on CD-rom, Genève, Switzerland. Appleby, Thorogood, Mann, Key (bib2) 1999; 70 Reijnders, Soret (bib46) 2003; 78 Casey, Holden (bib13) 2006; 90 Basset-Mens, Ledgard, Boyes (bib5) 2009; 68 Steinfeld, Gerber, Wassenaar, Castel, Rosales, De Haan (bib52) 2006 Berlin (bib9) 2002; 12 Nepstad, Sticker, Almeida (bib39) 2006; 20 Cederberg, C., Darelius, K., 2002. Using LCA methodology to assess the potential environmental impact of intensive beef and pork production (PhD Thesis). Department of Applied Environmental Science. Göteborg University, Sweden. Udo, Cornelissen (bib57) 1998; 27 Weidema, Wesnæs, Hermansen, Kristensen, Halberg, Eder, Delgado (bib61) 2008 Goodland (bib26) 1997; 23 Moll (bib36) 2005; 32 (bib1) 2006 Haas, Wetterich, Köpke (bib28) 2001; 83 Baumgartner, de Baan, Nemecek (bib7) 2008 Ellingsen, Aanondsen (bib21) 2006; 11 Schau, Fet (bib49) 2008; 13 Pelletier (bib41) 2008; 98 Bauman, Tillman (bib6) 2004 Lawrie, Ledward (bib35) 2006 Dalgaard, Halberg, Kristensen, Larsen (bib17) 2006; 117 Pimentel, Pimentel (bib44) 2003; 78 De Boer (bib18) 2003; 80 Cederberg, Flysjö (bib15) 2004 Casey, Holden (bib12) 2005; 86 Hospido, Moreira, Feijoo (bib29) 2003; 13 Monteny, Smits, Van Duinkerken, Mollenhorst, De Boer (bib38) 2002; 85 Tamminga, Bannink, Dijkstra, Zom (bib53) 2007 Bennett, Phipps, Strange (bib8) 2006; 15 De Boer, Smits, Mollenhorst, van Duinkerken, Monteny (bib19) 2002; 85 Carlsson-Kanyama (bib11) 1998; 23 Klein Goldewijk, Olivier, Peters, Coenen, Vreuls (bib34) 2005 Schils, De Haan, Hemmer, Van den Pol-Van Dasselaar, De Boer, Evers, Holshof, Van Middelkoop, Zom (bib50) 2007; 90 Ogino, Kaku, Osada, Shimada (bib40) 2004; 82 (bib27) 2002 Eriksson, Elmquist, Stern, Nybrant (bib22) 2005; 10 Katajajuuri (bib32) 2008 Cederberg, Mattsson (bib16) 2000; 8 FAOSTAT (bib24) 2009 Baroni, Cenci, Tettamanti, Berati (bib3) 2007; 61 IPCC (bib30) 2006 Roy, Nei, Orikasa, Xu, Okadome, Nakamura, Shiina (bib48) 2009; 90 Van Middelaar, C.E., Van Calker, K.J., Dolman, M.A., Berentsen, P.B.M., De Boer, I.J.M., 2009. Eco-efficiency of cheese production in the Netherlands. Garnett, T., 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science and Policy 12, 491–503. Schroeder, Titgemeyer (bib51) 2008; 114 Thomassen, Dalgaard, Heijungs, De Boer (bib54) 2008; 13 Thomassen, Van Calker, Smits, Iepema, De Boer (bib55) 2008; 96 Richardson, Shepherd, Elliman (bib47) 1993; 21 Elferink, Nonhebel (bib20) 2007; 15 FAO (bib23) 2002 Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., Sandars, D.L., 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report Defra Research Project ISO205, Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra. PVE, personal communication (bib45) 2008 Mollenhorst, Berentsen, De Boer (bib37) 2006; 47 Zhu-XueQin, Van Ierland (bib63) 2004; 1 Thomassen, Dolman, Van Calker, De Boer (bib56) 2009; 68 USDA (bib58) 2009 Basset-Mens, Van der Werf (bib4) 2005; 105 Blonk, Lafleur, Van Zeijts (bib10) 1997 Phong, L. T., De Boer, I.J.M., Udo, H.M.J., in preparation. Life cycle assessment of food production in integrated agriculture–aquaculture systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Vellinga, Van Laar, Thomassen, De Boer, Berkhout, Aiking (bib60) 2008 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib14 Eriksson (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib22) 2005; 10 Haas (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib28) 2001; 83 Pelletier (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib41) 2008; 98 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib59 Carlsson-Kanyama (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib11) 1998; 23 Schroeder (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib51) 2008; 114 Richardson (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib47) 1993; 21 Berlin (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib9) 2002; 12 Klein Goldewijk (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib34) 2005 Nepstad (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib39) 2006; 20 Vellinga (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib60) 2008 Monteny (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib38) 2002; 85 Steinfeld (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib52) 2006 Udo (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib57) 1998; 27 Appleby (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib2) 1999; 70 USDA (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib58) 2009 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib62 Weidema (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib61) 2008 De Boer (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib19) 2002; 85 Thomassen (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib56) 2009; 68 Katajajuuri (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib32) 2008 Thomassen (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib54) 2008; 13 Basset-Mens (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib4) 2005; 105 Basset-Mens (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib5) 2009; 68 Schau (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib49) 2008; 13 Roy (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib48) 2009; 90 Casey (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib13) 2006; 90 Baumgartner (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib7) 2008 Ogino (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib40) 2004; 82 Tamminga (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib53) 2007 Cederberg (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib15) 2004 Reijnders (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib46) 2003; 78 Thomassen (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib55) 2008; 96 Zhu-XueQin (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib63) 2004; 1 Dalgaard (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib17) 2006; 117 Baroni (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib3) 2007; 61 (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib1) 2006 (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib27) 2002 Blonk (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib10) 1997 Goodland (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib26) 1997; 23 Elferink (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib20) 2007; 15 FAO (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib23) 2002 Mollenhorst (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib37) 2006; 47 Cederberg (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib16) 2000; 8 Hospido (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib29) 2003; 13 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib42 IPCC (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib30) 2006 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib25 Schils (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib50) 2007; 90 PVE, personal communication (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib45) 2008 Casey (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib12) 2005; 86 Pimentel (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib43) 1992 Lawrie (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib35) 2006 FAOSTAT (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib24) 2009 Moll (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib36) 2005; 32 Ellingsen (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib21) 2006; 11 Pimentel (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib44) 2003; 78 Bauman (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib6) 2004 De Boer (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib18) 2003; 80 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib31 Bennett (10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib8) 2006; 15 |
| References_xml | – volume: 20 start-page: 1595 year: 2006 end-page: 1603 ident: bib39 article-title: Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation publication-title: Conservation Biology – reference: Cederberg, C., Darelius, K., 2002. Using LCA methodology to assess the potential environmental impact of intensive beef and pork production (PhD Thesis). Department of Applied Environmental Science. Göteborg University, Sweden. – year: 2007 ident: bib53 publication-title: Feeding strategies to reduce methane loss in dairy cattle. Report 34, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands – year: 2006 ident: bib52 article-title: Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options – volume: 98 start-page: 67 year: 2008 end-page: 73 ident: bib41 article-title: Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions publication-title: Agricultural Systems – volume: 32 start-page: 181 year: 2005 end-page: 193 ident: bib36 article-title: Costs and benefits of livestock systems and the role of market and non-market relationships publication-title: Agricultural Economics – year: 2009 ident: bib58 publication-title: National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference – volume: 12 start-page: 939 year: 2002 end-page: 953 ident: bib9 article-title: Environmental life cycle assessment of semi-hard cheese publication-title: International Dairy Journal – year: 2002 ident: bib27 publication-title: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment; Operational Guide to the ISO Standards – year: 2006 ident: bib30 publication-title: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – volume: 85 start-page: 3382 year: 2002 end-page: 3388 ident: bib19 article-title: Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics. Part I: relation between feed characteristics and urinary urea concentration publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 117 start-page: 223 year: 2006 end-page: 237 ident: bib17 article-title: Modeling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment – volume: 96 start-page: 95 year: 2008 end-page: 107 ident: bib55 article-title: Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands publication-title: Agricultural systems – year: 2006 ident: bib1 publication-title: Kwantitatieve Informatie Veehouderij 2006–2007 – volume: 13 start-page: 255 year: 2008 end-page: 264 ident: bib49 article-title: LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – volume: 23 start-page: 277 year: 1998 end-page: 293 ident: bib11 article-title: Climate change and dietary choices — how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? publication-title: Food Policy – volume: 114 start-page: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 10 ident: bib51 article-title: Interaction between protein and energy supply on protein utilization in growing cattle: a review publication-title: Livestock Science – reference: ISO, 2006. Environmental management. The ISO 14000 family of international standards ISO standard collection on CD-rom, Genève, Switzerland. – volume: 15 start-page: 1778 year: 2007 end-page: 1786 ident: bib20 article-title: Variations in land requirements for meat production publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production – reference: Van Middelaar, C.E., Van Calker, K.J., Dolman, M.A., Berentsen, P.B.M., De Boer, I.J.M., 2009. Eco-efficiency of cheese production in the Netherlands. – year: 1992 ident: bib43 article-title: Energy inputs in production: agriculture publication-title: Energy in Farm Production – volume: 15 start-page: 71 year: 2006 end-page: 82 ident: bib8 article-title: The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina publication-title: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences – year: 2008 ident: bib45 publication-title: Productschappen Vee, Vlees en Eieren (PVE). Personal communication August 25th, 2008 – volume: 23 start-page: 189 year: 1997 end-page: 200 ident: bib26 article-title: Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters publication-title: Ecological Economics – year: 2006 ident: bib35 article-title: Lawrie's meat science – volume: 105 start-page: 127 year: 2005 end-page: 144 ident: bib4 article-title: Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment – reference: Garnett, T., 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science and Policy 12, 491–503. – volume: 13 start-page: 783 year: 2003 end-page: 796 ident: bib29 article-title: Simplified life cycle assessment of galician milk production publication-title: International Dairy Journal – volume: 70 start-page: 525S year: 1999 end-page: 531S ident: bib2 article-title: The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition – volume: 10 start-page: 143 year: 2005 end-page: 154 ident: bib22 article-title: Environmental systems analysis of pig production: the impact of feed choice publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – reference: Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., Sandars, D.L., 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report Defra Research Project ISO205, Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra. – volume: 83 start-page: 43 year: 2001 end-page: 53 ident: bib28 article-title: Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment – volume: 8 start-page: 49 year: 2000 end-page: 60 ident: bib16 article-title: Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production – year: 2009 ident: bib24 publication-title: Electronic Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization – volume: 78 start-page: 660S year: 2003 end-page: 663S ident: bib44 article-title: Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment publication-title: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition – year: 2002 ident: bib23 publication-title: World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030 – year: 2008 ident: bib7 article-title: European grain legumes — environment-friendly animal feed? Life cycle assessment of pork, chicken meat, egg and milk production publication-title: Fedearl Department of Economic Affairs DEA. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zürich, Zwitzerland – volume: 90 start-page: 5334 year: 2007 end-page: 5346 ident: bib50 article-title: Dairy wise, a whole-farm dairy model publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – year: 2004 ident: bib15 article-title: Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in south-western Sweden publication-title: SIK Report Nr 728. The Swedisch Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden – volume: 13 start-page: 339 year: 2008 end-page: 349 ident: bib54 article-title: Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production publication-title: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – volume: 21 start-page: 41 year: 1993 end-page: 51 ident: bib47 article-title: Current attitudes and future influence on meat consumption in the U.K publication-title: Appetite – volume: 1 year: 2004 ident: bib63 article-title: Protein chains and environmental pressures: a comparison of pork and novel protein foods publication-title: Environmental Sciences – volume: 11 start-page: 60 year: 2006 end-page: 65 ident: bib21 article-title: Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon — a comparison with chicken publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – volume: 27 start-page: 219 year: 1998 end-page: 224 ident: bib57 article-title: Livestock in resource-poor farming systems publication-title: Outlook on Agriculture – year: 2008 ident: bib60 article-title: Environmental impact of animal feed (Milieueffecten van diervoeders) publication-title: Report 205, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and research centre, Lelystad, The Netherlands – volume: 78 start-page: 664S year: 2003 end-page: 668S ident: bib46 article-title: Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices publication-title: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition – year: 2008 ident: bib61 publication-title: Environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products. Report EUR 23491 EN – volume: 61 start-page: 279 year: 2007 end-page: 286 ident: bib3 article-title: Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems publication-title: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition – volume: 47 start-page: 405 year: 2006 end-page: 417 ident: bib37 article-title: On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems publication-title: British Poultry Science – volume: 80 start-page: 69 year: 2003 end-page: 77 ident: bib18 article-title: Review. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production publication-title: Livestock Production Science – volume: 90 start-page: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 10 ident: bib48 article-title: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products publication-title: Journal of Food Engineering – volume: 85 start-page: 3389 year: 2002 end-page: 3394 ident: bib38 article-title: Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics. Part II: relation between urinary urea concentration and ammonia emission publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – reference: Phong, L. T., De Boer, I.J.M., Udo, H.M.J., in preparation. Life cycle assessment of food production in integrated agriculture–aquaculture systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. – year: 2008 ident: bib32 article-title: Experiences and improvement possiblities — LCA case study of broiler chicken production publication-title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. Novermber 12–14, Zurich, Switzerland – volume: 68 start-page: 2278 year: 2009 end-page: 2284 ident: bib56 article-title: Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms publication-title: Ecological Economics – year: 2005 ident: bib34 article-title: Greenhouse gas emissions in the Netherlands 1990–2003 publication-title: National Inventory Report 2005. Report 773201009/2005 – volume: 86 start-page: 97 year: 2005 end-page: 114 ident: bib12 article-title: Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system publication-title: Agricultural Systems – year: 2004 ident: bib6 publication-title: The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA. An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application – volume: 90 start-page: 79 year: 2006 end-page: 98 ident: bib13 article-title: Quantification of GHG emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland publication-title: Agricultural Systems – volume: 82 start-page: 2115 year: 2004 end-page: 2122 ident: bib40 article-title: Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – year: 1997 ident: bib10 article-title: Towards an environmental infrastructure of the Dutch food industry: exploring the information conversion of five food commodities publication-title: Amsterdam, The Netherlands IVAM Environmental Research – volume: 68 start-page: 1615 year: 2009 end-page: 1625 ident: bib5 article-title: Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand publication-title: Ecological Economics – volume: 32 start-page: 181 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib36 article-title: Costs and benefits of livestock systems and the role of market and non-market relationships publication-title: Agricultural Economics doi: 10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00210.x – volume: 83 start-page: 43 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib28 article-title: Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00160-2 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib1 – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib62 – volume: 23 start-page: 277 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib11 article-title: Climate change and dietary choices — how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? publication-title: Food Policy doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(98)00037-2 – volume: 105 start-page: 127 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib4 article-title: Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 – volume: 85 start-page: 3389 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib38 article-title: Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics. Part II: relation between urinary urea concentration and ammonia emission publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74426-3 – volume: 13 start-page: 255 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib49 article-title: LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment doi: 10.1065/lca2007.12.372 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib52 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib35 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib23 – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib14 – volume: 61 start-page: 279 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib3 article-title: Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems publication-title: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522 – volume: 114 start-page: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib51 article-title: Interaction between protein and energy supply on protein utilization in growing cattle: a review publication-title: Livestock Science doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.008 – volume: 80 start-page: 69 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib18 article-title: Review. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production publication-title: Livestock Production Science doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00322-6 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib27 – volume: 78 start-page: 660S year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib44 article-title: Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment publication-title: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S – volume: 82 start-page: 2115 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib40 article-title: Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/2004.8272115x – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib42 – volume: 98 start-page: 67 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib41 article-title: Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions publication-title: Agricultural Systems doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007 – volume: 21 start-page: 41 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib47 article-title: Current attitudes and future influence on meat consumption in the U.K publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1006/appe.1993.1035 – volume: 47 start-page: 405 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib37 article-title: On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems publication-title: British Poultry Science doi: 10.1080/00071660600829282 – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib34 article-title: Greenhouse gas emissions in the Netherlands 1990–2003 – volume: 20 start-page: 1595 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib39 article-title: Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation publication-title: Conservation Biology doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00510.x – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib32 article-title: Experiences and improvement possiblities — LCA case study of broiler chicken production – volume: 90 start-page: 79 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib13 article-title: Quantification of GHG emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland publication-title: Agricultural Systems doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.008 – volume: 1 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib63 article-title: Protein chains and environmental pressures: a comparison of pork and novel protein foods publication-title: Environmental Sciences – volume: 8 start-page: 49 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib16 article-title: Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00311-X – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib7 article-title: European grain legumes — environment-friendly animal feed? Life cycle assessment of pork, chicken meat, egg and milk production – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib61 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib53 – volume: 27 start-page: 219 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib57 article-title: Livestock in resource-poor farming systems publication-title: Outlook on Agriculture doi: 10.1177/003072709802700406 – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib25 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 – volume: 15 start-page: 1778 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib20 article-title: Variations in land requirements for meat production publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.003 – volume: 117 start-page: 223 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib17 article-title: Modeling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.002 – volume: 12 start-page: 939 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib9 article-title: Environmental life cycle assessment of semi-hard cheese publication-title: International Dairy Journal doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00112-7 – volume: 85 start-page: 3382 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib19 article-title: Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics. Part I: relation between feed characteristics and urinary urea concentration publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74425-1 – volume: 90 start-page: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib48 article-title: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products publication-title: Journal of Food Engineering doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.016 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib10 article-title: Towards an environmental infrastructure of the Dutch food industry: exploring the information conversion of five food commodities – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib15 article-title: Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in south-western Sweden – volume: 23 start-page: 189 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib26 article-title: Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters publication-title: Ecological Economics doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00579-X – volume: 13 start-page: 783 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib29 article-title: Simplified life cycle assessment of galician milk production publication-title: International Dairy Journal doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00100-6 – volume: 86 start-page: 97 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib12 article-title: Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system publication-title: Agricultural Systems doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.09.006 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib45 – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib31 – volume: 10 start-page: 143 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib22 article-title: Environmental systems analysis of pig production: the impact of feed choice publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment doi: 10.1065/lca2004.06.160 – year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib43 article-title: Energy inputs in production: agriculture – ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib59 – volume: 68 start-page: 2278 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib56 article-title: Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms publication-title: Ecological Economics doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.011 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib24 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib60 article-title: Environmental impact of animal feed (Milieueffecten van diervoeders) – volume: 78 start-page: 664S year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib46 article-title: Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices publication-title: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.664S – volume: 70 start-page: 525S issue: suppl. 3 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib2 article-title: The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview publication-title: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.525s – volume: 90 start-page: 5334 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib50 article-title: Dairy wise, a whole-farm dairy model publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-842 – volume: 15 start-page: 71 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib8 article-title: The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina publication-title: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences doi: 10.22358/jafs/66843/2006 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib58 – volume: 11 start-page: 60 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib21 article-title: Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon — a comparison with chicken publication-title: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment doi: 10.1065/lca2006.01.236 – volume: 13 start-page: 339 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib54 article-title: Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production publication-title: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment doi: 10.1007/s11367-008-0007-y – volume: 68 start-page: 1615 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib5 article-title: Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand publication-title: Ecological Economics doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.017 – volume: 96 start-page: 95 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib55 article-title: Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands publication-title: Agricultural systems doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.06.001 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib6 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007_bib30 |
| SSID | ssj0054484 |
| Score | 2.5123227 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Livestock production has a major impact on the environment. Choosing a more environmentally-friendly livestock product in a diet can mitigate environmental... |
| SourceID | wageningen proquest crossref fao elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | ammonia emission assessment lca beef chicken meat climate change dairy products dietary protein Eggs energy use and consumption Environmental impact eutrophication fecundity feed characteristics feed conversion food consumption food-products gas emissions global warming greenhouse-gas emissions input output analysis land use Life cycle assessment literature reviews livestock and meat industry livestock production Meat meta-analysis methane methodology Milk organic milk-production Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development pig production pork production systems quantification Review soil acidification urinary urea concentration yields |
| Title | Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 https://www.proquest.com/docview/46531767 http://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs%2F388316 |
| Volume | 128 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PT9swFLb4cWEHNNgmyjbmA9esSezYzm5VNdRtggtUQrtYdmKjTlVaNS2IC3_73osdBhIS0k6REj_H8rOfP9vvfY-QU6cEs1L6pEi5TXgubWKKiuGRQOGsqOu8y0VwfiEmU_7zurjeIuM-FgbdKqPtDza9s9bxzTD25nA5mw0vM8D6GdpgPIwTJdjh3ZyVAob27ujHr8lFb5AL2IF0l8tQPkGBPoKuc_Oaz26h9kBciXSemFf25RVq25vFMxy6dwdTvulioJ6sSWdvyX4Ek3QU2ntAtlxzSN6MblaRUMO9I7_HIdFgc0OfxLSBUAiPbCmAVjpH7tk1WEa6DASw7Tc6oiGqhS48fPeOVvfwD2oemTzb92R69v1qPEliPoWk4lKtE2ZT4yTjzuWy4E6VyhgLCKY00qa1ZVXqUwZ4iGPuMeG5h80aDDTmSmkAFVbsA9lpFo07IlQZW9u0sLABqrj1Svm8dqICcwGVyLwYENb3oa4i2TjmvJjr3qvsjw49j3kwS9iHaOj5AUkepZaBbOOV8rJXj342aDSsB69IHoE2tQGFtHp6meP9baYQzqoB-dKrWMNUw_sT07jFptVIRZdJAcLsn-Z1gzmfWo003fHgTd9tVrqZ4wPmVKuZUiwTx__d2I9kL_gsoOfbJ7KzXm3cZ4BCa3tCtr8-ZCdxwP8Fkb8KFA |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT-MwELYKHBYOaNmH2oVdfNhraBI7sbO3qqLq8rpAJcTFshMbFVVp1bSLuPDbdyZOuiCthMQpUmI7lscz_mzPfEPITytTZoRwQRJyE_BYmEAnOcMjgcSatCjiOhfB5VU6nvCz2-S2Q4ZtLAy6VTa239v02lo3b_rNaPYX02n_OgKsH6ENxsO4NAM7vMNBfVE7T543fh4J7D_qq2UoHWDxNn6udvKaTf9A2562Esk8Mavs_9enLafnr1Do7iMofFlHQL1YkUYfyX4DJenA9_aAdGz5iewN7pcNnYb9TO6GPs1geU9fRLRBJR8cWVGArHSGzLMrsIt04elfq190QH1MC507-O4szZ_gH1RveDyrL2QyOr0ZjoMmm0KQcyFXATOhtoJxa2ORcCszqbUB_JJpYcLCsDx0IQM0xDHzWOq4g60aTDNmM6EBE-bsK9ku56XtEiq1KUyYGNj-5Nw4KV1c2DQHYwGNiDjpEdaOocobqnHMeDFTrU_Zg_Ijj1kwM9iFKBj5Hgk2tRaeauON8qIVj3o1ZRSsBm_U7II0lQaBVGpyHePtbSQRzMoeOW5FrEDR8PZEl3a-rhQS0UUihcrsn-RViRmfKoUk3c2xm3pcL1U5wwdoVKWYlCxKv727s8fkw_jm8kJd_L46PyS73nsBfeCOyPZqubbfARStzI960v8Fw4IK2A |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+environmental+impacts+for+livestock+products%3A+A+review+of+life+cycle+assessments&rft.jtitle=Livestock+science&rft.au=de+Vries%2C+M.&rft.au=de+Boer%2C+I.J.M.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=1871-1413&rft.eissn=1878-0490&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.livsci.2009.11.007&rft.externalDocID=S1871141309003692 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1871-1413&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1871-1413&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1871-1413&client=summon |