A randomized five-year clinical study of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the five-year clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions with or without selective acid-etching of enamel margins. A total of 104 cervical restorations in 22 patients (46–64 years) were bonded following ei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 33; no. 6; pp. 757 - 763
Main Authors SAY, Esra CAN, YURDAGUVEN, Haktan, OZEL, Emre, SOYMAN, Mubin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 2014
Subjects
Acid Etching, Dental - methods
Acrylic Resins - chemistry
Clinical evaluation
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Dentistry
Enamel etching
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions
Surface Properties
Treatment Outcome
Two-step self-etch adhesive
USPHS criteria
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the five-year clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions with or without selective acid-etching of enamel margins. A total of 104 cervical restorations in 22 patients (46–64 years) were bonded following either self-etch approach (AdheSE non-etch) or a similar application, including selective acid-etching of enamel margins (AdheSE etch), and were restored with resin composite. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after one, two, three and five-years (84 restorations in 19 patients) according to the USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed using McNemar’s test. Cumulative retention rates for the non-etch and etch groups were 82.6% and 86.1% respectively. No significant differences were detected in the retention rates, marginal adaptations at dentin side and secondary caries between the groups. After five-years, the clinical performance of the two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective acid-etching of enamel margins, was acceptable.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to evaluate the five-year clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions with or without selective acid-etching of enamel margins. A total of 104 cervical restorations in 22 patients (46-64 years) were bonded following either self-etch approach (AdheSE non-etch) or a similar application, including selective acid-etching of enamel margins (AdheSE etch), and were restored with resin composite. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after one, two, three and five-years (84 restorations in 19 patients) according to the USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test. Cumulative retention rates for the non-etch and etch groups were 82.6% and 86.1% respectively. No significant differences were detected in the retention rates, marginal adaptations at dentin side and secondary caries between the groups. After five-years, the clinical performance of the two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective acid-etching of enamel margins, was acceptable.
Author YURDAGUVEN, Haktan
OZEL, Emre
SOYMAN, Mubin
SAY, Esra CAN
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: SAY, Esra CAN
  organization: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University
– sequence: 2
  fullname: YURDAGUVEN, Haktan
  organization: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University
– sequence: 3
  fullname: OZEL, Emre
  organization: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli
– sequence: 4
  fullname: SOYMAN, Mubin
  organization: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25311337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo90D1v2zAQBmCiSNE4abfOBccOpcsvUdSYBmkSwECWdiYo6hjTkESXpBo4vz5SnHjhAbzn3uG9QGdjHAGhr4yuJWX8Zzfs1pwySRhVH9CKac0IE4qdoRXluiaykvU5ush5R6lslNaf0DmvBGNC1CsUr3CyYxeH8Awd9uE_kAPYhF0fxuBsj3OZugOOHltcniLJBfY4Q-8JFLfFtttCno_wUyhbHNPrjFNZCLiybGC0A_R44WF8_Iw-ettn-PI2L9Hf3zd_ru_I5uH2_vpqQ5ysdSGc20pYSgVtW9fSSlMvWga-UlYq0VWWNl7pRjIueSMb3jLZKa0UberWt96KS_T9mLtP8d8EuZghZAd9b0eIUzZMCVlz0TRspj-O1KWYcwJv9ikMNh0Mo2ap2MwVm6Xi-UPN_Ntb8tQO0J3we6cz-HUEu1zsI5yATSW4Hl7ThDBqed5TT0u3tcnAKF4Ag4mQ0A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2015_07_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2015_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1080_01694243_2016_1185228
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_021_03901_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_022_04505_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2016_09_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpemd_2015_12_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2019_02_012
crossref_primary_10_2341_17_060_L
crossref_primary_10_2341_15_309_C
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2016_06_003
crossref_primary_10_17214_gaziaot_438002
crossref_primary_10_4012_dmj_2017_292
Cites_doi 10.4012/dmj.2011-245
10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
10.2341/11-389-L
10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.003
10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.190
10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.594
10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.006
10.1007/s00784-013-1123-z
10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.009
10.1055/s-0039-1698947
10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011
10.2341/07-42
10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0104
10.2341/07-63
10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.005
10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002
10.2341/09-089-C
10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7
10.2341/07-128
10.1177/154405910508400204
10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.005
10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.003
10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009
10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009
10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.4012/dmj.2014-106
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1881-1361
EndPage 763
ExternalDocumentID 10_4012_dmj_2014_106
25311337
article_dmj_33_6_33_2014_106_article_char_en
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
34H
53G
5GY
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
DIK
DU5
EBS
EJD
F5P
GK1
JMI
JSF
JSH
KQ8
MOJWN
OK1
P2P
RJT
RZJ
2WC
7.U
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RYR
TKC
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-22a53a0030bbcb0580f3b1ef56a463d5a09f689412429492b14d6866097bfbfa3
ISSN 0287-4547
IngestDate Thu Apr 11 21:31:08 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:16:06 EDT 2024
Thu May 23 23:20:21 EDT 2024
Wed Apr 05 06:11:41 EDT 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c478t-22a53a0030bbcb0580f3b1ef56a463d5a09f689412429492b14d6866097bfbfa3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dmj/33/6/33_2014-106/_article/-char/en
PMID 25311337
PQID 1634723991
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1634723991
crossref_primary_10_4012_dmj_2014_106
pubmed_primary_25311337
jstage_primary_article_dmj_33_6_33_2014_106_article_char_en
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2014
  text: 2014-00-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Dental Materials Journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Dent. Mater. J.
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
Publisher_xml – name: The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
References 6) Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of cervical restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 114-125.
15) Fron H, Vergnes JN, Moussally C, Cazier S, Simon AL, Chieze JB, Savard G, Tirlet G, Attal JP. Effectiveness of a new one step self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice-based study. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 304-312.
24) Martins GC, Sánchez-Ayala A, D’Alpino PH, Calixto AL, Gomes JC, Gomes OM. Interfacial integrity of bonded restorations with self-etching adhesives: Water storage and thermo-mechanical cycling. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 169-177.
14) Abdalla Ali A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a selfetch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent 2007; 35: 558-563.
23) Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Ermis RB, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1045-1052.
1) Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.
10) Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H.Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 155-162.
27) Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006; 34: 97-105.
29) Van Dijken JWV. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 27-32.
8) Bayne SC. Correlation of clinical performance with ‘in vitro tests’ of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 52-71.
18) Can Sey E, Özel E, Yurdagüver H, Soyman M. Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1427-1433.
31) Tay FR, Pashey DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: A review. J Dent 2004; 32: 173-196.
26) Abdalla AI. Effect of long-term water aging on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 29-33.
22) Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 370-378.
13) Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Pre-etching vs. grinding in promotion of adhesion to intact enamel using selfetch adhesives. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 394-400.
35) Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V. Clinical performance of cervical restorations-A meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 993-1000.
36) Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 5-33.
5) Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A. Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-121.
16) Ermis RB, Temel UB, Cellik EU, Kam O. Clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 147-155.
2) El-Deeb HA, Al Sherbiney HH, Mobarak EH. Bond durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/without fluoride after aging in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 48-56.
32) Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
25) Abdalla AI, Elsayed HY, García-Godoy F. Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self etch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 233-238.
21) Van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentine lesions. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 27-32.
20) American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines: Dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2001.
34) Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 339-344.
7) Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 72-86.
12) Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 79-88.
30) Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 424-429.
33) Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 397-412.
4) van Dijken JWV. A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 940-946.
17) Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentine bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 26-36.
3) Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1176-1184.
9) Perdigao J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 492-499.
19) Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Dental Health Center. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office.1971 Publication No. 7902244.
28) De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
11) Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1459-1467.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
10
32
11
33
12
34
13
35
14
36
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
References_xml – ident: 13
  doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-245
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.2341/11-389-L
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.003
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.190
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.594
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.006
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1123-z
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.009
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698947
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.2341/07-42
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0104
– ident: 9
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.2341/07-63
– ident: 20
– ident: 26
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.005
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.2341/09-089-C
– ident: 36
  doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.2341/07-128
– ident: 19
– ident: 34
– ident: 32
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.1177/154405910508400204
– ident: 29
– ident: 30
– ident: 33
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.005
– ident: 35
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.003
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009
– ident: 31
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009
– ident: 21
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.006
– ident: 25
– ident: 23
SSID ssj0049688
Score 2.155814
Snippet The purpose of this study was to evaluate the five-year clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions with or...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
jstage
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 757
SubjectTerms Acid Etching, Dental - methods
Acrylic Resins - chemistry
Clinical evaluation
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Dentistry
Enamel etching
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions
Surface Properties
Treatment Outcome
Two-step self-etch adhesive
USPHS criteria
Title A randomized five-year clinical study of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dmj/33/6/33_2014-106/_article/-char/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25311337
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1634723991
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Dental Materials Journal, 2014/11/28, Vol.33(6), pp.757-763
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZgIMEL4jrKTUaCp8ijiZ2beKqgUwW7CNFK5SmyG3sw1mRqU9D66znHdtKChjR4cSvHdVt_nz8fX84xIa9UiJfVRQmTaVwyEaU5w6hqLFYl51LFeRmiv_PhUTKaiA_TeLo5ymu9Sxq1N1tf6lfyP6hCHuCKXrL_gGxXKWTAe8AXUkAY0ithPAhgpCnr-bc1mI0GdItdYFyejbdjGzFaBs3PmgGg58FSnxmGWAWy_Krt4XW7Flsv7CseU17au3Hwia7kXJ8FWLwd4rwh-965UYK96_5osP2D7Z4G6Ia0CA6Xi077v6wWpTxZ_XBiN5Lfmw07j9fuxMBwvjmQ-7m-8Eu0hyvlg4T7NQrnFbqnnaJmWchC7iKut5LrYl94am3rZ-qiVfuh2GvfnyoPU0KMGlvOT_FonoCR5JJg2kfHxf7k4KAYD6fj6-QGkDBGAfz4qdtkEnmSZc4XAmt8s13fb1bKzVMw1E_03-cg1hYZ3yV3_CSCDhwj7pFrurpPbiEk9u6-B6Qe0A0zaMcM2jKDWmbQ2lBJW2bQjhm0ZQZFRtB6QT0zaMcM6phBPTMeksn-cPxuxPzVGmwm0qxhUSRjLlHhlZop6K19w1WoTZxIkfAylv3cJFmOV5NHucgjFYoygU7cz1NllJH8Edmp6ko_JlQYbdJQayPyvoDKFdh8SpZQr4CScd4jr9umLM5dBJUCZp7Y5AU0eYFNDhlJj7x17dyV8v3KluK8SDBpS3cP0TkRtKBHXrbgFCCQuOslK12vlgVMOESKHtxhj-w61LpviGAECjlPn1zh00_JbcsOu_z2jOw0i5V-DgZpo15YWv0CkYCT_g
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,4043,27956,27957,27958
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+randomized+five-year+clinical+study+of+a+two-step+self-etch+adhesive+with+or+without+selective+enamel+etching&rft.jtitle=Dental+materials+journal&rft.au=Can+Say%2C+Esra&rft.au=Yurdaguven%2C+Haktan&rft.au=Ozel%2C+Emre&rft.au=Soyman%2C+Mubin&rft.date=2014&rft.eissn=1881-1361&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=763&rft_id=info:doi/10.4012%2Fdmj.2014-106&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0287-4547&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0287-4547&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0287-4547&client=summon