An international comparison of retinopathy of prematurity grading performance within the Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting II trials

• Published in: Eye (London) Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 74 - 80
• Main Authors: Fleck, B W, Williams, C, Juszczak, E, Cocker, K, Stenson, B J, Darlow, B A, Dai, S, Gole, G A, Quinn, G E, Wallace, D K, Ells, A, Carden, S, Butler, L, Clark, D, Elder, J, Wilson, C, Biswas, S, Shafiq, A, King, A, Brocklehurst, P, Fielder, A R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 01.01.2018
• Subjects: Australia - epidemiology; Canada - epidemiology; Clinical Study; Diagnosis; Eye; Eye examinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gestational Age; Humans; Image processing; Incidence; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Male; Medical personnel; New Zealand; Ophthalmoscopy - methods; Oxygen; Oxygen - metabolism; Oxygen Consumption - physiology; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods; Oxygen saturation; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Retinopathy; Retinopathy of Prematurity - epidemiology; Retinopathy of Prematurity - metabolism; Retinopathy of Prematurity - therapy; United Kingdom - epidemiology; United States - epidemiology; Variation
• ISSN: 0950-222X; 1476-5454
• DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.150

PurposeTo investigate whether the observed international differences in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treatment rates within the Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting (BOOST) II trials might have been caused by international variation in ROP disease grading.MethodsGroups of BOOST II trial ophthalmologists in UK, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZ), and an international reference group (INT) used a web based system to grade a selection of RetCam images of ROP acquired during the BOOST II UK trial. Rates of decisions to treat, plus disease grading, ROP stage grading, ROP zone grading, inter-observer variation within groups and intra-observer variation within groups were measured.ResultsForty-two eye examinations were graded. UK ophthalmologists diagnosed treat-requiring ROP more frequently than ANZ ophthalmologists, 13.9 (3.49) compared to 9.4 (4.46) eye examinations, P=0.038. UK ophthalmologists diagnosed plus disease more frequently than ANZ ophthalmologists, 14.1 (6.23) compared to 8.5 (3.24) eye examinations, P=0.021. ANZ ophthalmologists diagnosed stage 2 ROP more frequently than UK ophthalmologists, 20.2 (5.8) compared to 12.7 (7.1) eye examinations, P=0.026. There were no other significant differences in the grading of ROP stage or zone. Inter-observer variation was higher within the UK group than within the ANZ group. Intra-observer variation was low in both groups.ConclusionsWe have found evidence of international variation in the diagnosis of treatment-requiring ROP. Improved standardisation of the diagnosis of treatment-requiring ROP is required. Measures might include improved training in the grading of ROP, using an international approach, and further development of ROP image analysis software.