DNA barcoding identifies cryptic animal tool materials

Some animals fashion tools or constructions out of plant materials to aid foraging, reproduction, self-maintenance, or protection. Their choice of raw materials can affect the structure and properties of the resulting artifacts, with considerable fitness consequences. Documenting animals’ material p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 118; no. 29; pp. 1 - 3
Main Authors Steele, Matthew P., Neaves, Linda E., Klump, Barbara C., St Clair, James J. H., Fernandes, Joana R. S. M., Hequet, Vanessa, Shaw, Phil, Hollingsworth, Peter M., Rutz, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 20.07.2021
SeriesBrief Report
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Some animals fashion tools or constructions out of plant materials to aid foraging, reproduction, self-maintenance, or protection. Their choice of raw materials can affect the structure and properties of the resulting artifacts, with considerable fitness consequences. Documenting animals’ material preferences is challenging, however, as manufacture behavior is often difficult to observe directly, and materials may be processed so heavily that they lack identifying features. Here, we use DNA barcoding to identify, from just a few recovered tool specimens, the plant species New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) use for crafting elaborate hooked stick tools in one of our long-term study populations. The method succeeded where extensive fieldwork using an array of conventional approaches—including targeted observations, camera traps, radio-tracking, bird-mounted video cameras, and behavioral experiments with wild and temporarily captive subjects—had failed. We believe that DNA barcoding will prove useful for investigating many other tool and construction behaviors, helping to unlock significant research potential across a wide range of study systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC8307691
Edited by Scott V. Edwards, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved May 2, 2021 (received for review February 11, 2021)
Author contributions: M.P.S., L.E.N., B.C.K., J.J.H.S.C., P.M.H., and C.R. designed research; M.P.S., L.E.N., B.C.K., J.J.H.S.C., J.R.S.M.F., V.H., P.S., P.M.H., and C.R. performed research; M.P.S., L.E.N., B.C.K., and P.M.H. analyzed data; M.P.S., L.E.N., and C.R. wrote the paper; and C.R. led, and secured funding for, the long-term project.
2Present address: Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
1M.P.S. and L.E.N. contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2020699118