Perinatal outcomes in euploid pregnancies with ‘double-positive’ first trimester prenatal screening for trisomy 18 and 21
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first tr...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of perinatology Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 836 - 840 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.11.2013
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective:
The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Study Design:
This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using
t
-tests and
χ
2
-tests; statistical significance was set at
P
<0.05.
Result:
Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (
P
=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (
P
=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (
P
=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.
Conclusion:
Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.
Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double- positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs forT21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and [chi square]-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULT: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P = 0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P = 0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P = 0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013 Keywords: aneuploidy screening; first trimester screening; false-positive screening; ultrasound abnormalities; nuchal translucency The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.RESULTOf 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.CONCLUSIONPregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t -tests and χ 2 -tests; statistical significance was set at P <0.05. Result: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies ( P =0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth ( P =0.02) and lower mean birth weight ( P =0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013 Objective:The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.Study Design:This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ2-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Result:Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.Conclusion:Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Bianco, K Pena, S Cheng, Y W Valderramos, S G Yee, L M |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: L M surname: Yee fullname: Yee, L M organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: S G surname: Valderramos fullname: Valderramos, S G organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco – sequence: 3 givenname: S surname: Pena fullname: Pena, S organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco – sequence: 4 givenname: Y W surname: Cheng fullname: Cheng, Y W organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco – sequence: 5 givenname: K surname: Bianco fullname: Bianco, K email: biancok@obgyn.ucsf.edu organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kt9qFDEUxoNU7LZ64wNIQBBRZk0mmUlyWYr_oKAXeh2ymTO7WWaTMckovRD6GPp6fRIzbNW2FslFyMnv-87hnHOEDnzwgNBjSpaUMPlqOy5rQtlSyntoQbloq6bh7AAtiOCskoy3h-gopS0h86d4gA5rJqWgqlmg7x8hOm-yGXCYsg07SNh5DNM4BNfhMcLaG29dCX9zeYMvL350YVoNUI0huey-wuXFT9y7mDLO0RV5hjjL9p7JRgDv_Br3Ic5ACrtzTCU2vsM1fYju92ZI8OjqPkaf37z-dPquOvvw9v3pyVlluRC5MkpwIknXg21bZXqgrFd0RVqqLOeGGsqUEj2F2hraccYbgPIyYJisFSHsGD3f-44xfJlKjXrnkoVhMB7ClDTlXHAlpGgL-vQWug1T9KU6XbecNKWltfofVbxaRZVi4i-1NgNo5_uQo7Fzan3CGlq3dctkoZZ3UOV0sHO2jLp3JX5D8OyaYANmyJsUhim74NNN8MlVldNqB50ey4BMPNe_x1-AF3vAxpBShP4PQomed0tvRz3vlpazG7kFW5fNnLTU64a7JS_3klR8_RritTb9S_8CtNHekg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4103_ijnmr_ijnmr_259_21 crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_4682 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06774_8 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/uog.6123 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010 10.1002/pd.303 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x 10.1056/NEJMoa025273 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6 10.1093/humrep/des286 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1 10.1056/NEJMoa043693 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x 10.1002/pd.2718 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25 10.1002/uog.3809 10.1002/pd.2434 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Nature America, Inc. 2013 COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2013 Nature America, Inc. 2013. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Nature America, Inc. 2013 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group – notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2013 – notice: Nature America, Inc. 2013. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QG 7QL 7RV 7T5 7T7 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AN0 AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M7N M7P NAPCQ P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1038/jp.2013.88 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Proquest) Immunology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Proquest Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Database (Proquest) ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database (Proquest) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Public Health British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1476-5543 |
EndPage | 840 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3112257961 A351262638 23887195 10_1038_jp_2013_88 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | United States--US San Francisco California California |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: San Francisco California – name: United States--US – name: California |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: K12HD001262 – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: K12HD000849 – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: K08HD069518-01 |
GroupedDBID | --- -Q- .GJ .XZ 04C 0R~ 29L 2FS 2WC 39C 3V. 4.4 406 53G 5GY 5RE 70F 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AACDK AANZL AAQOH AAQQT AASML AATNV AAWTL AAYZH AAZLF ABAKF ABAWZ ABDBF ABJNI ABLJU ABPPZ ABUWG ABZZP ACAOD ACGFO ACGFS ACKTT ACMJI ACNCT ACPRK ACRQY ACUHS ACZOJ ADBBV ADFRT ADHDB AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFKRA AFRAH AFSHS AGAYW AGHAI AGQEE AHMBA AHSBF AIGIU AILAN AJRNO ALFFA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMYLF AN0 AXYYD BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKEYQ BKKNO BMSDO BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DIK DNIVK DPUIP DU5 E3Z EBLON EBS EE. EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FDQFY FERAY FIGPU FIZPM FSGXE FYUFA GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC IWAJR JSO JZLTJ KQ8 LGEZI LOTEE M1P M7P NADUK NAO NAPCQ NQJWS NXXTH O9- OK1 OVD P2P PCD PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RNS RNT RNTTT ROL SNX SNYQT SOHCF SOJ SRMVM SV3 SWTZT TAOOD TBHMF TDRGL TEORI TR2 TSG TUS UKHRP WH7 WOW ZCG ZGI AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT ABRTQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB AEIIB PMFND 7QG 7QL 7T5 7T7 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. LK8 M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS PUEGO 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a974080dfec669afe13f91b0619c44a1a13997f1e2ca1d4345eef1eaea3829003 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0743-8346 1476-5543 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 22:27:54 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:41:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 08:50:26 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:02:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:41:50 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:20:38 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:56:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:00 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:39:03 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | ultrasound abnormalities nuchal translucency aneuploidy screening first trimester screening false-positive screening |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-a974080dfec669afe13f91b0619c44a1a13997f1e2ca1d4345eef1eaea3829003 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 23887195 |
PQID | 1446919937 |
PQPubID | 30566 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1447497876 proquest_journals_2640574329 proquest_journals_1446919937 gale_infotracmisc_A351262638 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A351262638 gale_healthsolutions_A351262638 pubmed_primary_23887195 crossref_primary_10_1038_jp_2013_88 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_jp_2013_88 springer_journals_10_1038_jp_2013_88 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2013 text: 2013-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of perinatology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Perinatol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Perinatol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group US Nature Publishing Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing Group US – name: Nature Publishing Group |
References | Breathnach, Malone, Lambert-Messerlian, Cuckle, Porter, Nyberg (CR20) 2007; 110 Reddy, Wapner (CR2) 2007; 50 Nicolaides, Syngelaki, Ashoor, Birdir, Touzet (CR24) 2012; 207 Kagan, Wright, Maiz, Pandeva, Nicolaides (CR7) 2008; 32 Gagnon, Wilson, Audibert, Allen, Blight, Brock (CR9) 2008; 30 Piazze, Anceschi, Cerekja, La Torre, Pala, Papa (CR15) 2007; 98 Souka, Krampl, Bakalis, Heath, Nicolaides (CR16) 2001; 18 Wapner, Thom, Simpson, Pergament, Silver, Filkins (CR3) 2003; 349 Wapner, Martin, Levy, Ballif, Eng, Zachary (CR21) 2012; 367 Nakata, Wang, Bhatt (CR1) 2010; 30 Ong, Liao, Spencer, Munim, Nicolaides (CR12) 2000; 107 Alamillo, Fiddler, Pergament (CR18) 2012; 24 Wald, Rodeck, Hackshaw, Walters, Chitty, Mackinson (CR5) 2003; 10 Vora, Johnson, Lambert-Messerlian, Tighiouart, Peter, Urato (CR25) 2010; 116 Goetzl (CR8) 2010; 30 Norton, Brar, Weiss, Karimi, Laurent, Caughey (CR22) 2012; 207 Pergament, Stein, Fiddler, Cho, Kupferminc (CR10) 1995; 86 Pergament, Alamillo, Sak, Fiddler (CR17) 2011; 31 Allyse, Sayres, King, Norton, Cho (CR23) 2012; 27 Spencer, Spencer, Power, Dawson, Nicolaides (CR6) 2003; 110 Spencer, Cowans, Avgidou, Nicolaides (CR11) 2006; 28 DiLorenzo, Ceccarello, Cecotti, Ronfani, Monasta, Vecchi Brumatti (CR14) 2012; 33 Malone, Canick, Ball, Nyberg, Comstock, Bukowski (CR4) 2005; 353 Goetzinger, Cahill, Kemma, Odibo, Macones, Odibo (CR13) 2012; 31 Summers, Huang, Wyatt (CR19) 2002; 22 K Spencer (BFjp201388_CR6) 2003; 110 FD Malone (BFjp201388_CR4) 2005; 353 L Goetzl (BFjp201388_CR8) 2010; 30 CY Ong (BFjp201388_CR12) 2000; 107 K Spencer (BFjp201388_CR11) 2006; 28 A Gagnon (BFjp201388_CR9) 2008; 30 FM Breathnach (BFjp201388_CR20) 2007; 110 G DiLorenzo (BFjp201388_CR14) 2012; 33 AM Summers (BFjp201388_CR19) 2002; 22 UM Reddy (BFjp201388_CR2) 2007; 50 N Nakata (BFjp201388_CR1) 2010; 30 KO Kagan (BFjp201388_CR7) 2008; 32 NL Vora (BFjp201388_CR25) 2010; 116 KH Nicolaides (BFjp201388_CR24) 2012; 207 RJ Wapner (BFjp201388_CR21) 2012; 367 ME Norton (BFjp201388_CR22) 2012; 207 J Piazze (BFjp201388_CR15) 2007; 98 C Alamillo (BFjp201388_CR18) 2012; 24 KR Goetzinger (BFjp201388_CR13) 2012; 31 M Allyse (BFjp201388_CR23) 2012; 27 E Pergament (BFjp201388_CR10) 1995; 86 E Pergament (BFjp201388_CR17) 2011; 31 RJ Wapner (BFjp201388_CR3) 2003; 349 NJ Wald (BFjp201388_CR5) 2003; 10 AP Souka (BFjp201388_CR16) 2001; 18 |
References_xml | – volume: 30 start-page: 198 issue: 3 year: 2010 end-page: 206 ident: CR1 article-title: Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age publication-title: Prenat Diagn – volume: 32 start-page: 488 year: 2008 end-page: 492 ident: CR7 article-title: Screening for trisomy 18 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6123 – volume: 98 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 9 ident: CR15 article-title: Nuchal translucency as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010 – volume: 22 start-page: 266 year: 2002 end-page: 271 ident: CR19 article-title: Pregnancy outcomes of women with positive serum screening results for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. Letter to the Editor publication-title: Prenat Diagn doi: 10.1002/pd.303 – volume: 367 start-page: 2175 year: 2012 end-page: 2184 ident: CR21 article-title: Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382 – volume: 50 start-page: 442 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 453 ident: CR2 article-title: Comparison of first and second trimester aneuploidy risk assessment publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99 – volume: 110 start-page: 281 year: 2003 end-page: 286 ident: CR6 article-title: Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x – volume: 349 start-page: 1405 year: 2003 end-page: 1413 ident: CR3 article-title: First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273 – volume: 86 start-page: 255 issue: 2 year: 1995 end-page: 258 ident: CR10 article-title: Adverse pregnancy outcome after a false-positive screen for Down syndrome using multiple markers publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4 – volume: 10 start-page: 56 year: 2003 end-page: 104 ident: CR5 article-title: First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine, and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS) publication-title: J Med Screen – volume: 33 start-page: 495 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 501 ident: CR14 article-title: First trimester maternal serum PIGF, free bHCG, PAPP-A, PP-13, uterine artery Doppler and maternal history for the prediction of preeclampsia publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003 – volume: 18 start-page: 9 year: 2001 end-page: 17 ident: CR16 article-title: Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x – volume: 30 start-page: 918 year: 2008 end-page: 949 ident: CR9 article-title: Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Can doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5 – volume: 110 start-page: 651 year: 2007 end-page: 657 ident: CR20 article-title: for the First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium. First- and second-trimester screening: Detection of aneuploidies other than Down Syndrome publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6 – volume: 27 start-page: 3123 issue: 11 year: 2012 end-page: 3131 ident: CR23 article-title: Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/des286 – volume: 31 start-page: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 6 ident: CR13 article-title: First-trimester prediction of preterm birth using ADAM12, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler, and maternal characteristics publication-title: Prenat Diagn – volume: 30 start-page: 613 year: 2010 end-page: 628 ident: CR8 article-title: Adverse pregnancy outcomes after abnormal first-trimester screening for aneuploidy publication-title: Clin Lab Med doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003 – volume: 207 start-page: e1 issue: 5 year: 2012 end-page: e6 ident: CR24 article-title: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033 – volume: 116 start-page: 673 issue: 3 year: 2010 end-page: 678 ident: CR25 article-title: Relationships between cell-free DNA and serum analytes in first and second trimesters of pregnancy publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1 – volume: 353 start-page: 2001 year: 2005 end-page: 2011 ident: CR4 article-title: First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down’s syndrome publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043693 – volume: 207 start-page: e1 issue: 137 year: 2012 end-page: e8 ident: CR22 article-title: Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 107 start-page: 1265 issue: 10 year: 2000 end-page: 1270 ident: CR12 article-title: First trimester maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complications publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x – volume: 31 start-page: 307 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 310 ident: CR17 article-title: Genetic assessment following increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype publication-title: Prenat Diagn doi: 10.1002/pd.2718 – volume: 24 start-page: 102 year: 2012 end-page: 108 ident: CR18 article-title: Increased nuchal translucency in the presence of normal chromosomes: what’s next? publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25 – volume: 28 start-page: 637 issue: 5 year: 2006 end-page: 643 ident: CR11 article-title: First-trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of impending fetal death publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.3809 – volume: 10 start-page: 56 year: 2003 ident: BFjp201388_CR5 publication-title: J Med Screen – volume: 50 start-page: 442 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: BFjp201388_CR2 publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99 – volume: 27 start-page: 3123 issue: 11 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR23 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/des286 – volume: 116 start-page: 673 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: BFjp201388_CR25 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1 – volume: 32 start-page: 488 year: 2008 ident: BFjp201388_CR7 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6123 – volume: 367 start-page: 2175 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR21 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382 – volume: 349 start-page: 1405 year: 2003 ident: BFjp201388_CR3 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273 – volume: 31 start-page: 1 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR13 publication-title: Prenat Diagn – volume: 22 start-page: 266 year: 2002 ident: BFjp201388_CR19 publication-title: Prenat Diagn doi: 10.1002/pd.303 – volume: 86 start-page: 255 issue: 2 year: 1995 ident: BFjp201388_CR10 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4 – volume: 33 start-page: 495 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR14 publication-title: Placenta doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003 – volume: 31 start-page: 307 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: BFjp201388_CR17 publication-title: Prenat Diagn doi: 10.1002/pd.2718 – volume: 30 start-page: 198 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: BFjp201388_CR1 publication-title: Prenat Diagn doi: 10.1002/pd.2434 – volume: 30 start-page: 918 year: 2008 ident: BFjp201388_CR9 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Can doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5 – volume: 110 start-page: 651 year: 2007 ident: BFjp201388_CR20 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6 – volume: 353 start-page: 2001 year: 2005 ident: BFjp201388_CR4 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043693 – volume: 207 start-page: e1 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR24 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033 – volume: 30 start-page: 613 year: 2010 ident: BFjp201388_CR8 publication-title: Clin Lab Med doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003 – volume: 28 start-page: 637 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: BFjp201388_CR11 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.3809 – volume: 107 start-page: 1265 issue: 10 year: 2000 ident: BFjp201388_CR12 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x – volume: 18 start-page: 9 year: 2001 ident: BFjp201388_CR16 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x – volume: 24 start-page: 102 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR18 publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25 – volume: 110 start-page: 281 year: 2003 ident: BFjp201388_CR6 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x – volume: 98 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: BFjp201388_CR15 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010 – volume: 207 start-page: e1 issue: 137 year: 2012 ident: BFjp201388_CR22 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol |
SSID | ssj0014767 |
Score | 2.0319736 |
Snippet | Objective:
The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid... The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes... OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid... Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013 Objective:The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid... |
SourceID | proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 836 |
SubjectTerms | 692/420/2489/1381/1286 692/700/139/1512 692/700/1720 Abnormalities Adult Amniocentesis Aneuploidy Anomalies Birth weight Chi-square test Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Down syndrome Down Syndrome - diagnosis False Positive Reactions Female Fetuses Genetic Testing Gestational age Gynecology Humans Karyotypes Karyotyping Medical screening Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Obstetrics original-article Pediatric Surgery Pediatrics Ploidies Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Trimester, First Pregnancy, Complications of Premature birth Prenatal Diagnosis Retrospective Studies Risk factors Screening Statistical analysis Statistical tests Testing Trisomy Trisomy - diagnosis Trisomy 18 Syndrome Ultrasonography, Prenatal Womens health |
Title | Perinatal outcomes in euploid pregnancies with ‘double-positive’ first trimester prenatal screening for trisomy 18 and 21 |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/jp.2013.88 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887195 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1446919937 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2640574329 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1447497876 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA-6gfgifludM-JAfKi7adKmfZI5NoawMcTBfSv5qtxxbevaCj4I-zP039tf4jnpx3bn8KVQcpqmTU7OZ36HkC0dS8kya8NZ4pJQxEZjmRe4dSoyOopmVqNr4PAoOTgRn-bxfHC4NUNa5bgn-o3aVgZ95NsguEG1EDzKPtTfQ6wahdHVoYTGbbKO0GWY0iXnk8HFhPQVZD0MZ8pFMsKT8nT7FLEqGX_vK65cCqTr2_IVuXQtUOrlz_59cm9QHOlOP9MPyC1XPiR3DofQ-CPy6xgP8qEzhlZdC9_kGrooqevqZbWwtD5zX_tKvA1F3yu9OP9tq04vXdjnbf1wF-d_aLEAbZC2iPmPCAr4WN8n7C5g8cLIKGi5SNBU335SllJVWhqxx-Rkf-_L7kE41FYIjZCyDRXYEaAs2sKZJMlU4RgvMqZBumdGCMUUaIaZLJiLjGJWcBE7B3fKKY6h1xl_QtbKqnTPCI1dGisbF0aYTEQ60jNdOAFqpOZFGnEdkHfjD87NADyO9S-WuQ-A8zQ_rXOcjDxNA_Jmoq17uI0bqV7hPOX9UdGJR_MdDuoLwusAxVtPgVwK7zJqOGwAI0a8qxXKjRVK4C6z2jyuhXzg7iZHGzrDzEd5Y_PlUg3I66kZO8aEttJVne9CYnE_mQTkab_Epg8GLQrM2CwOyNa45q68-5-_8fz_Y3hB7iJhf35yg6y1Z517CYpUqzc9t8A13WWbZP3j3tHx57_Gbx_j |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwEB6VrQRcEP8ECjWiCHEI3djO3wGhAq22tLuqUCv1ltqOg7ZaktDdBfWA1MeAl-Ch-iTM5GfbLRW3HiNPHMcez3zj8cwArGg_DL04Td1uYANX-kZTmRd8tIobzXk31XQ00B8EvT35ad_fX4A_bSwMXatsZWIlqNPC0Bn5KipuhBZS8Phd-c2lqlHkXW1LaNRssWWPf6DJNn67-RHX9yXnG-u7H3puU1XANTIMJ65CBI0wKc2sCYJYZdYTWexp1GuxkVJ5CjFRHGae5UZ5qRTStxaflFWCnI5dgf1eg0Up0JTpwOL79cHO55nfQoZVzdoq8WckZNAmRBXR6iFlx_TEm6rGy5kKvKgIzmnCC67ZSuNt3IZbDVRlazVv3YEFm9-F6_3GGX8Pfu5Q6CAd_7BiOsFZtGM2zJmdlqNimLLyyH6pa_-OGZ32stOTX2kx1SPr1jfFvtvTk98sGyL-ZBOqMkA5G-i1uk-UZ2hj48gY4moiGBdfj5kXMZWnjHv3Ye9K5v0BdPIit4-A-TbyVepnRppYcs11V2dWInDVIou40A68bic4MU2qc6q4MUoql7uIksMyocVIosiBFzPask7wcSnVMq1TUgenzqRCsiYQMFFCH6R4VVGQXMBvGdWEN-CIKcPWHOXSHCXuZzPf3PJC0siTcUJWe0x3LcNLm882hwPPZ83UMV2hy20xrboIqZxgGDjwsGax2Q8jbkPDOfYdWGl57ty3_5mNx_8fwzLc6O32t5PtzcHWE7hJL9XRm0vQmRxN7VOEcRP9rNk7DA6uerv-Ba3iW9k |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3JbtNAdFSKVHFB7AQKHUQR4mCSWeyxDwhVlKiltOqBSrmZ2YxSBTvUCagHpH4G_Aqf0y_hPW9tSsWtR2uex-OZt87bCFk3oVIscS4YRD4KZGgNtnmBR6-5NZwPnMGrgd29aOtAfhiFoyXyp82FwbDKlidWjNoVFu_I-yC4QbWQgif9rAmL2N8cvp1-C7CDFHpa23YaNYrs-OMfYL6Vb7Y34axfcD58_-ndVtB0GAisVGoWaNCmQWVymbdRlOjMM5ElzICMS6yUmmnQjxKVMc-tZk4KGXoPT9prgQ7IgYB5r5HrSoQMaUyNOmOPSVV1r61KgMZCRm1pVBH3D7FOJhOvq24vZ8Lwokg4JxMvOGkr2Te8RW42SivdqLHsNlny-R2ystu45e-Sn_uYRIgXQbSYz2A_fUnHOfXz6aQYOzo98l_qLsAlxXtfenryyxVzM_FBHTP23Z-e_KbZGDRROsN-A1i9AV-r5wTOBtY2rIyCho0AZfH1mLKY6txRzu6RgyvZ9ftkOS9y_5DQ0MehdmFmpU0kN9wMTOYlqLBGZDEXpkdetRuc2qboOfbemKSV813E6eE0xcNI47hHnnew07rUx6VQa3hOaZ2m2vGHdANwgGNpH4B4WUEgh4BvWd0kOsCKsdbWAuTqAiRQtl0cbnEhbThLmaL9nmDUpbp0-IxMeuRZN4wTYzBd7ot5NYXCxoIq6pEHNYp1PwwaHJjQSdgj6y3Onfv2P7vx6P9rWCMrQKTpx-29ncfkBr5Tp3GukuXZ0dw_AX1uZp5WhEPJ56um1L_ue16p |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal+outcomes+in+euploid+pregnancies+with+%27double-positive%27+first+trimester+prenatal+screening+for+trisomy+18+and+21&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+perinatology&rft.au=Valderramos%2C+S.G&rft.au=Pena%2C+S&rft.au=Bianco%2C+K&rft.au=Yee%2C+L.M&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fjp.2013.88&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A351262638 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |