Perinatal outcomes in euploid pregnancies with ‘double-positive’ first trimester prenatal screening for trisomy 18 and 21

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of perinatology Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 836 - 840
Main Authors Yee, L M, Valderramos, S G, Pena, S, Cheng, Y W, Bianco, K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.11.2013
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t -tests and χ 2 -tests; statistical significance was set at P <0.05. Result: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies ( P =0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth ( P =0.02) and lower mean birth weight ( P =0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
AbstractList The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double- positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs forT21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and [chi square]-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULT: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P = 0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P = 0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P = 0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities. Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013 Keywords: aneuploidy screening; first trimester screening; false-positive screening; ultrasound abnormalities; nuchal translucency
The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.RESULTOf 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.CONCLUSIONPregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t -tests and χ 2 -tests; statistical significance was set at P <0.05. Result: Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies ( P =0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth ( P =0.02) and lower mean birth weight ( P =0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusion: Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013
Objective:The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.Study Design:This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ2-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Result:Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different.Conclusion:Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes were at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had first trimester aneuploidy screening. Double-positive subjects had risks greater than screening cutoffs for T21 and T18 and confirmed euploid karyotypes. Singleton subjects were matched 1:2 by maternal age to controls with normal screening. Perinatal outcomes were investigated using t-tests and χ(2)-tests; statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Of 9733 women who had first trimester screening, 33 euploid pregnancies screened positive for both T21 and T18. Compared with controls, these study subjects were more likely to have abnormalities identified by prenatal ultrasounds, including renal, fetal membrane and fluid, as well as multiple anomalies (P=0.01). In addition, double-positive subjects had a lower mean gestational age at birth (P=0.02) and lower mean birth weight (P=0.03) than controls. Maternal outcomes were not significantly different. Pregnancies with double false-positive first trimester aneuploidy screening were associated with pregnancy/fetal abnormalities.
Audience Academic
Author Bianco, K
Pena, S
Cheng, Y W
Valderramos, S G
Yee, L M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: L M
  surname: Yee
  fullname: Yee, L M
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: S G
  surname: Valderramos
  fullname: Valderramos, S G
  organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S
  surname: Pena
  fullname: Pena, S
  organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Y W
  surname: Cheng
  fullname: Cheng, Y W
  organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
– sequence: 5
  givenname: K
  surname: Bianco
  fullname: Bianco, K
  email: biancok@obgyn.ucsf.edu
  organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kt9qFDEUxoNU7LZ64wNIQBBRZk0mmUlyWYr_oKAXeh2ymTO7WWaTMckovRD6GPp6fRIzbNW2FslFyMnv-87hnHOEDnzwgNBjSpaUMPlqOy5rQtlSyntoQbloq6bh7AAtiOCskoy3h-gopS0h86d4gA5rJqWgqlmg7x8hOm-yGXCYsg07SNh5DNM4BNfhMcLaG29dCX9zeYMvL350YVoNUI0huey-wuXFT9y7mDLO0RV5hjjL9p7JRgDv_Br3Ic5ACrtzTCU2vsM1fYju92ZI8OjqPkaf37z-dPquOvvw9v3pyVlluRC5MkpwIknXg21bZXqgrFd0RVqqLOeGGsqUEj2F2hraccYbgPIyYJisFSHsGD3f-44xfJlKjXrnkoVhMB7ClDTlXHAlpGgL-vQWug1T9KU6XbecNKWltfofVbxaRZVi4i-1NgNo5_uQo7Fzan3CGlq3dctkoZZ3UOV0sHO2jLp3JX5D8OyaYANmyJsUhim74NNN8MlVldNqB50ey4BMPNe_x1-AF3vAxpBShP4PQomed0tvRz3vlpazG7kFW5fNnLTU64a7JS_3klR8_RritTb9S_8CtNHekg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_4103_ijnmr_ijnmr_259_21
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_4682
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06774_8
Cites_doi 10.1002/uog.6123
10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010
10.1002/pd.303
10.1056/NEJMoa1203382
10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99
10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x
10.1056/NEJMoa025273
10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4
10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x
10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5
10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6
10.1093/humrep/des286
10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1
10.1056/NEJMoa043693
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x
10.1002/pd.2718
10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25
10.1002/uog.3809
10.1002/pd.2434
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Nature America, Inc. 2013
COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2013
Nature America, Inc. 2013.
Copyright_xml – notice: Nature America, Inc. 2013
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 Nature Publishing Group
– notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2013
– notice: Nature America, Inc. 2013.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QG
7QL
7RV
7T5
7T7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
NAPCQ
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1038/jp.2013.88
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Proquest)
Immunology Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Proquest Public Health Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database (Proquest)
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database (Proquest)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Public Health
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic



ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Student
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1476-5543
EndPage 840
ExternalDocumentID 3112257961
A351262638
23887195
10_1038_jp_2013_88
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United States--US
San Francisco California
California
GeographicLocations_xml – name: San Francisco California
– name: United States--US
– name: California
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: K12HD001262
– fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: K12HD000849
– fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: K08HD069518-01
GroupedDBID ---
-Q-
.GJ
.XZ
04C
0R~
29L
2FS
2WC
39C
3V.
4.4
406
53G
5GY
5RE
70F
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AACDK
AANZL
AAQOH
AAQQT
AASML
AATNV
AAWTL
AAYZH
AAZLF
ABAKF
ABAWZ
ABDBF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPPZ
ABUWG
ABZZP
ACAOD
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACKTT
ACMJI
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACRQY
ACUHS
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADHDB
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFSHS
AGAYW
AGHAI
AGQEE
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIGIU
AILAN
AJRNO
ALFFA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYLF
AN0
AXYYD
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKKNO
BMSDO
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
E3Z
EBLON
EBS
EE.
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F5P
FDQFY
FERAY
FIGPU
FIZPM
FSGXE
FYUFA
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HZ~
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
IWAJR
JSO
JZLTJ
KQ8
LGEZI
LOTEE
M1P
M7P
NADUK
NAO
NAPCQ
NQJWS
NXXTH
O9-
OK1
OVD
P2P
PCD
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
RNS
RNT
RNTTT
ROL
SNX
SNYQT
SOHCF
SOJ
SRMVM
SV3
SWTZT
TAOOD
TBHMF
TDRGL
TEORI
TR2
TSG
TUS
UKHRP
WH7
WOW
ZCG
ZGI
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
ABRTQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
AEIIB
PMFND
7QG
7QL
7T5
7T7
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
LK8
M7N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a974080dfec669afe13f91b0619c44a1a13997f1e2ca1d4345eef1eaea3829003
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0743-8346
1476-5543
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:27:54 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 12:41:59 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 08:50:26 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:02:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:41:50 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:20:38 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:50:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:56:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:00 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:39:03 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords ultrasound abnormalities
nuchal translucency
aneuploidy screening
first trimester screening
false-positive screening
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-a974080dfec669afe13f91b0619c44a1a13997f1e2ca1d4345eef1eaea3829003
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 23887195
PQID 1446919937
PQPubID 30566
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1447497876
proquest_journals_2640574329
proquest_journals_1446919937
gale_infotracmisc_A351262638
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A351262638
gale_healthsolutions_A351262638
pubmed_primary_23887195
crossref_primary_10_1038_jp_2013_88
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_jp_2013_88
springer_journals_10_1038_jp_2013_88
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of perinatology
PublicationTitleAbbrev J Perinatol
PublicationTitleAlternate J Perinatol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Nature Publishing Group US
Nature Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing Group US
– name: Nature Publishing Group
References Breathnach, Malone, Lambert-Messerlian, Cuckle, Porter, Nyberg (CR20) 2007; 110
Reddy, Wapner (CR2) 2007; 50
Nicolaides, Syngelaki, Ashoor, Birdir, Touzet (CR24) 2012; 207
Kagan, Wright, Maiz, Pandeva, Nicolaides (CR7) 2008; 32
Gagnon, Wilson, Audibert, Allen, Blight, Brock (CR9) 2008; 30
Piazze, Anceschi, Cerekja, La Torre, Pala, Papa (CR15) 2007; 98
Souka, Krampl, Bakalis, Heath, Nicolaides (CR16) 2001; 18
Wapner, Thom, Simpson, Pergament, Silver, Filkins (CR3) 2003; 349
Wapner, Martin, Levy, Ballif, Eng, Zachary (CR21) 2012; 367
Nakata, Wang, Bhatt (CR1) 2010; 30
Ong, Liao, Spencer, Munim, Nicolaides (CR12) 2000; 107
Alamillo, Fiddler, Pergament (CR18) 2012; 24
Wald, Rodeck, Hackshaw, Walters, Chitty, Mackinson (CR5) 2003; 10
Vora, Johnson, Lambert-Messerlian, Tighiouart, Peter, Urato (CR25) 2010; 116
Goetzl (CR8) 2010; 30
Norton, Brar, Weiss, Karimi, Laurent, Caughey (CR22) 2012; 207
Pergament, Stein, Fiddler, Cho, Kupferminc (CR10) 1995; 86
Pergament, Alamillo, Sak, Fiddler (CR17) 2011; 31
Allyse, Sayres, King, Norton, Cho (CR23) 2012; 27
Spencer, Spencer, Power, Dawson, Nicolaides (CR6) 2003; 110
Spencer, Cowans, Avgidou, Nicolaides (CR11) 2006; 28
DiLorenzo, Ceccarello, Cecotti, Ronfani, Monasta, Vecchi Brumatti (CR14) 2012; 33
Malone, Canick, Ball, Nyberg, Comstock, Bukowski (CR4) 2005; 353
Goetzinger, Cahill, Kemma, Odibo, Macones, Odibo (CR13) 2012; 31
Summers, Huang, Wyatt (CR19) 2002; 22
K Spencer (BFjp201388_CR6) 2003; 110
FD Malone (BFjp201388_CR4) 2005; 353
L Goetzl (BFjp201388_CR8) 2010; 30
CY Ong (BFjp201388_CR12) 2000; 107
K Spencer (BFjp201388_CR11) 2006; 28
A Gagnon (BFjp201388_CR9) 2008; 30
FM Breathnach (BFjp201388_CR20) 2007; 110
G DiLorenzo (BFjp201388_CR14) 2012; 33
AM Summers (BFjp201388_CR19) 2002; 22
UM Reddy (BFjp201388_CR2) 2007; 50
N Nakata (BFjp201388_CR1) 2010; 30
KO Kagan (BFjp201388_CR7) 2008; 32
NL Vora (BFjp201388_CR25) 2010; 116
KH Nicolaides (BFjp201388_CR24) 2012; 207
RJ Wapner (BFjp201388_CR21) 2012; 367
ME Norton (BFjp201388_CR22) 2012; 207
J Piazze (BFjp201388_CR15) 2007; 98
C Alamillo (BFjp201388_CR18) 2012; 24
KR Goetzinger (BFjp201388_CR13) 2012; 31
M Allyse (BFjp201388_CR23) 2012; 27
E Pergament (BFjp201388_CR10) 1995; 86
E Pergament (BFjp201388_CR17) 2011; 31
RJ Wapner (BFjp201388_CR3) 2003; 349
NJ Wald (BFjp201388_CR5) 2003; 10
AP Souka (BFjp201388_CR16) 2001; 18
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 198
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 206
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 32
  start-page: 488
  year: 2008
  end-page: 492
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Screening for trisomy 18 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.6123
– volume: 98
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 9
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Nuchal translucency as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010
– volume: 22
  start-page: 266
  year: 2002
  end-page: 271
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Pregnancy outcomes of women with positive serum screening results for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. Letter to the Editor
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.303
– volume: 367
  start-page: 2175
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2184
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382
– volume: 50
  start-page: 442
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 453
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Comparison of first and second trimester aneuploidy risk assessment
  publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99
– volume: 110
  start-page: 281
  year: 2003
  end-page: 286
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one-stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x
– volume: 349
  start-page: 1405
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1413
  ident: CR3
  article-title: First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273
– volume: 86
  start-page: 255
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  end-page: 258
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Adverse pregnancy outcome after a false-positive screen for Down syndrome using multiple markers
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4
– volume: 10
  start-page: 56
  year: 2003
  end-page: 104
  ident: CR5
  article-title: First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine, and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS)
  publication-title: J Med Screen
– volume: 33
  start-page: 495
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 501
  ident: CR14
  article-title: First trimester maternal serum PIGF, free bHCG, PAPP-A, PP-13, uterine artery Doppler and maternal history for the prediction of preeclampsia
  publication-title: Placenta
  doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003
– volume: 18
  start-page: 9
  year: 2001
  end-page: 17
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x
– volume: 30
  start-page: 918
  year: 2008
  end-page: 949
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Can
  doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5
– volume: 110
  start-page: 651
  year: 2007
  end-page: 657
  ident: CR20
  article-title: for the First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium. First- and second-trimester screening: Detection of aneuploidies other than Down Syndrome
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3123
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  end-page: 3131
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/des286
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 6
  ident: CR13
  article-title: First-trimester prediction of preterm birth using ADAM12, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler, and maternal characteristics
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 30
  start-page: 613
  year: 2010
  end-page: 628
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Adverse pregnancy outcomes after abnormal first-trimester screening for aneuploidy
  publication-title: Clin Lab Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003
– volume: 207
  start-page: e1
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: e6
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033
– volume: 116
  start-page: 673
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 678
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Relationships between cell-free DNA and serum analytes in first and second trimesters of pregnancy
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1
– volume: 353
  start-page: 2001
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2011
  ident: CR4
  article-title: First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down’s syndrome
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043693
– volume: 207
  start-page: e1
  issue: 137
  year: 2012
  end-page: e8
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 107
  start-page: 1265
  issue: 10
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1270
  ident: CR12
  article-title: First trimester maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complications
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x
– volume: 31
  start-page: 307
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 310
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Genetic assessment following increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.2718
– volume: 24
  start-page: 102
  year: 2012
  end-page: 108
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Increased nuchal translucency in the presence of normal chromosomes: what’s next?
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25
– volume: 28
  start-page: 637
  issue: 5
  year: 2006
  end-page: 643
  ident: CR11
  article-title: First-trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of impending fetal death
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.3809
– volume: 10
  start-page: 56
  year: 2003
  ident: BFjp201388_CR5
  publication-title: J Med Screen
– volume: 50
  start-page: 442
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: BFjp201388_CR2
  publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9b99
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3123
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR23
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/des286
– volume: 116
  start-page: 673
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: BFjp201388_CR25
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea2dd1
– volume: 32
  start-page: 488
  year: 2008
  ident: BFjp201388_CR7
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.6123
– volume: 367
  start-page: 2175
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR21
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382
– volume: 349
  start-page: 1405
  year: 2003
  ident: BFjp201388_CR3
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025273
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR13
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 22
  start-page: 266
  year: 2002
  ident: BFjp201388_CR19
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.303
– volume: 86
  start-page: 255
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  ident: BFjp201388_CR10
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00108-4
– volume: 33
  start-page: 495
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR14
  publication-title: Placenta
  doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.03.003
– volume: 31
  start-page: 307
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: BFjp201388_CR17
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.2718
– volume: 30
  start-page: 198
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: BFjp201388_CR1
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.2434
– volume: 30
  start-page: 918
  year: 2008
  ident: BFjp201388_CR9
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Can
  doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5
– volume: 110
  start-page: 651
  year: 2007
  ident: BFjp201388_CR20
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278570.76392.a6
– volume: 353
  start-page: 2001
  year: 2005
  ident: BFjp201388_CR4
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043693
– volume: 207
  start-page: e1
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR24
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.033
– volume: 30
  start-page: 613
  year: 2010
  ident: BFjp201388_CR8
  publication-title: Clin Lab Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.003
– volume: 28
  start-page: 637
  issue: 5
  year: 2006
  ident: BFjp201388_CR11
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.3809
– volume: 107
  start-page: 1265
  issue: 10
  year: 2000
  ident: BFjp201388_CR12
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11618.x
– volume: 18
  start-page: 9
  year: 2001
  ident: BFjp201388_CR16
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00454.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 102
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR18
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b25
– volume: 110
  start-page: 281
  year: 2003
  ident: BFjp201388_CR6
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x
– volume: 98
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: BFjp201388_CR15
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.02.010
– volume: 207
  start-page: e1
  issue: 137
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp201388_CR22
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
SSID ssj0014767
Score 2.0319736
Snippet Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid...
The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid karyotypes...
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid...
Journal of Perinatology (2013) 33, 836-840; doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.88; published online 25 July 2013
Objective:The objective of this study was to investigate whether women who screened positive for both trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 21 (T21) yet had euploid...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 836
SubjectTerms 692/420/2489/1381/1286
692/700/139/1512
692/700/1720
Abnormalities
Adult
Amniocentesis
Aneuploidy
Anomalies
Birth weight
Chi-square test
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Down syndrome
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
False Positive Reactions
Female
Fetuses
Genetic Testing
Gestational age
Gynecology
Humans
Karyotypes
Karyotyping
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Obstetrics
original-article
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Ploidies
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Pregnancy, Complications of
Premature birth
Prenatal Diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk factors
Screening
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Testing
Trisomy
Trisomy - diagnosis
Trisomy 18 Syndrome
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Womens health
Title Perinatal outcomes in euploid pregnancies with ‘double-positive’ first trimester prenatal screening for trisomy 18 and 21
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/jp.2013.88
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887195
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1446919937
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2640574329
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1447497876
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA-6gfgifludM-JAfKi7adKmfZI5NoawMcTBfSv5qtxxbevaCj4I-zP039tf4jnpx3bn8KVQcpqmTU7OZ36HkC0dS8kya8NZ4pJQxEZjmRe4dSoyOopmVqNr4PAoOTgRn-bxfHC4NUNa5bgn-o3aVgZ95NsguEG1EDzKPtTfQ6wahdHVoYTGbbKO0GWY0iXnk8HFhPQVZD0MZ8pFMsKT8nT7FLEqGX_vK65cCqTr2_IVuXQtUOrlz_59cm9QHOlOP9MPyC1XPiR3DofQ-CPy6xgP8qEzhlZdC9_kGrooqevqZbWwtD5zX_tKvA1F3yu9OP9tq04vXdjnbf1wF-d_aLEAbZC2iPmPCAr4WN8n7C5g8cLIKGi5SNBU335SllJVWhqxx-Rkf-_L7kE41FYIjZCyDRXYEaAs2sKZJMlU4RgvMqZBumdGCMUUaIaZLJiLjGJWcBE7B3fKKY6h1xl_QtbKqnTPCI1dGisbF0aYTEQ60jNdOAFqpOZFGnEdkHfjD87NADyO9S-WuQ-A8zQ_rXOcjDxNA_Jmoq17uI0bqV7hPOX9UdGJR_MdDuoLwusAxVtPgVwK7zJqOGwAI0a8qxXKjRVK4C6z2jyuhXzg7iZHGzrDzEd5Y_PlUg3I66kZO8aEttJVne9CYnE_mQTkab_Epg8GLQrM2CwOyNa45q68-5-_8fz_Y3hB7iJhf35yg6y1Z517CYpUqzc9t8A13WWbZP3j3tHx57_Gbx_j
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwEB6VrQRcEP8ECjWiCHEI3djO3wGhAq22tLuqUCv1ltqOg7ZaktDdBfWA1MeAl-Ch-iTM5GfbLRW3HiNPHMcez3zj8cwArGg_DL04Td1uYANX-kZTmRd8tIobzXk31XQ00B8EvT35ad_fX4A_bSwMXatsZWIlqNPC0Bn5KipuhBZS8Phd-c2lqlHkXW1LaNRssWWPf6DJNn67-RHX9yXnG-u7H3puU1XANTIMJ65CBI0wKc2sCYJYZdYTWexp1GuxkVJ5CjFRHGae5UZ5qRTStxaflFWCnI5dgf1eg0Up0JTpwOL79cHO55nfQoZVzdoq8WckZNAmRBXR6iFlx_TEm6rGy5kKvKgIzmnCC67ZSuNt3IZbDVRlazVv3YEFm9-F6_3GGX8Pfu5Q6CAd_7BiOsFZtGM2zJmdlqNimLLyyH6pa_-OGZ32stOTX2kx1SPr1jfFvtvTk98sGyL-ZBOqMkA5G-i1uk-UZ2hj48gY4moiGBdfj5kXMZWnjHv3Ye9K5v0BdPIit4-A-TbyVepnRppYcs11V2dWInDVIou40A68bic4MU2qc6q4MUoql7uIksMyocVIosiBFzPask7wcSnVMq1TUgenzqRCsiYQMFFCH6R4VVGQXMBvGdWEN-CIKcPWHOXSHCXuZzPf3PJC0siTcUJWe0x3LcNLm882hwPPZ83UMV2hy20xrboIqZxgGDjwsGax2Q8jbkPDOfYdWGl57ty3_5mNx_8fwzLc6O32t5PtzcHWE7hJL9XRm0vQmRxN7VOEcRP9rNk7DA6uerv-Ba3iW9k
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3JbtNAdFSKVHFB7AQKHUQR4mCSWeyxDwhVlKiltOqBSrmZ2YxSBTvUCagHpH4G_Aqf0y_hPW9tSsWtR2uex-OZt87bCFk3oVIscS4YRD4KZGgNtnmBR6-5NZwPnMGrgd29aOtAfhiFoyXyp82FwbDKlidWjNoVFu_I-yC4QbWQgif9rAmL2N8cvp1-C7CDFHpa23YaNYrs-OMfYL6Vb7Y34axfcD58_-ndVtB0GAisVGoWaNCmQWVymbdRlOjMM5ElzICMS6yUmmnQjxKVMc-tZk4KGXoPT9prgQ7IgYB5r5HrSoQMaUyNOmOPSVV1r61KgMZCRm1pVBH3D7FOJhOvq24vZ8Lwokg4JxMvOGkr2Te8RW42SivdqLHsNlny-R2ystu45e-Sn_uYRIgXQbSYz2A_fUnHOfXz6aQYOzo98l_qLsAlxXtfenryyxVzM_FBHTP23Z-e_KbZGDRROsN-A1i9AV-r5wTOBtY2rIyCho0AZfH1mLKY6txRzu6RgyvZ9ftkOS9y_5DQ0MehdmFmpU0kN9wMTOYlqLBGZDEXpkdetRuc2qboOfbemKSV813E6eE0xcNI47hHnnew07rUx6VQa3hOaZ2m2vGHdANwgGNpH4B4WUEgh4BvWd0kOsCKsdbWAuTqAiRQtl0cbnEhbThLmaL9nmDUpbp0-IxMeuRZN4wTYzBd7ot5NYXCxoIq6pEHNYp1PwwaHJjQSdgj6y3Onfv2P7vx6P9rWCMrQKTpx-29ncfkBr5Tp3GukuXZ0dw_AX1uZp5WhEPJ56um1L_ue16p
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal+outcomes+in+euploid+pregnancies+with+%27double-positive%27+first+trimester+prenatal+screening+for+trisomy+18+and+21&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+perinatology&rft.au=Valderramos%2C+S.G&rft.au=Pena%2C+S&rft.au=Bianco%2C+K&rft.au=Yee%2C+L.M&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fjp.2013.88&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A351262638
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon