The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses [S]

• Published in: Molecular & cellular proteomics Vol. 14; no. 12; pp. 3299 - 3309
• Main Authors: Bennett, KeirynL, Wang, Xia, Bystrom, CoryE, Chambers, MatthewC, Andacht, TracyM, Dangott, LarryJ, Elortza, Félix, Leszyk, John, Molina, Henrik, Moritz, RobertL, Phinney, BrettS, Thompson, J.Will, Bunger, MaureenK, Tabb, DavidL
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2015; The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• Subjects: Animals; Cattle; Chromatography, Liquid - methods; Humans; Laboratories; Longitudinal Studies; Peptides - isolation & purification; Proteins - analysis; Proteins - metabolism; Proteomics - methods; Quality Control; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods; Technological Innovation and Resources
• ISSN: 1535-9476; 1535-9484
• DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O115.051888

Questions concerning longitudinal data quality and reproducibility of proteomic laboratories spurred the Protein Research Group of the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF-PRG) to design a study to systematically assess the reproducibility of proteomic laboratories over an extended period of time. Developed as an open study, initially 64 participants were recruited from the broader mass spectrometry community to analyze provided aliquots of a six bovine protein tryptic digest mixture every month for a period of nine months. Data were uploaded to a central repository, and the operators answered an accompanying survey. Ultimately, 45 laboratories submitted a minimum of eight LC-MSMS raw data files collected in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. No standard operating procedures were enforced; rather the participants were encouraged to analyze the samples according to usual practices in the laboratory. Unlike previous studies, this investigation was not designed to compare laboratories or instrument configuration, but rather to assess the temporal intralaboratory reproducibility. The outcome of the study was reassuring with 80% of the participating laboratories performing analyses at a medium to high level of reproducibility and quality over the 9-month period. For the groups that had one or more outlying experiments, the major contributing factor that correlated to the survey data was the performance of preventative maintenance prior to the LC-MSMS analyses. Thus, the Protein Research Group of the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities recommends that laboratories closely scrutinize the quality control data following such events. Additionally, improved quality control recording is imperative. This longitudinal study provides evidence that mass spectrometry-based proteomics is reproducible. When quality control measures are strictly adhered to, such reproducibility is comparable among many disparate groups. Data from the study are available via ProteomeXchange under the accession code PXD002114.