Assessment of coastal density gradients near a macro-tidal estuary: Application to the Mersey and Liverpool Bay

Density gradients in coastal regions with significant freshwater input are large and variable and are a major control of nearshore circulation. However their measurement is difficult, especially where the gradients are largest, close to the coast, with significant uncertainties because of a variety...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContinental shelf research Vol. 87; pp. 73 - 83
Main Authors Howarth, M.J., Balfour, C.A., Player, Rose J.J., Polton, Jeff A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Density gradients in coastal regions with significant freshwater input are large and variable and are a major control of nearshore circulation. However their measurement is difficult, especially where the gradients are largest, close to the coast, with significant uncertainties because of a variety of factors – time and spatial (horizontal and vertical) scales are small, tidal currents are strong and water depths shallow. Whilst temperature measurements are relatively straightforward, measurement of salinity (the dominant control of spatial variability for density) can be less reliable in turbid coastal waters. The nearshore density gradients in Liverpool Bay are investigated using an integrated multi-year data set from an in situ buoy, instrumented ferry and HF radar. The ferry is particularly useful for estimating coastal density gradients since measurements are made right from the mouth of Mersey, where gradients are on average 3×10−4kgm−4. Using measurements at the single in situ site by the Mersey Bar, 17km from land, density gradients can be estimated from the tidal excursion or by using ferry data; both giving average values of 5×10−5kgm−4. Nine years of surface salinity measurements there show no evidence of predominant periodicities, although there is a weak annual cycle, and no consistent relation with storms or floods, leading to the conclusion that the majority of the Mersey plume, for most of the time, lies closer to the English shore than the Mersey Bar. Liverpool Bay's circulation is the dominant factor, with wind forcing tending to reinforce it for wind speeds greater than 5–10ms−1. Near bed currents are consistently shoreward and near surface currents northward. •The Mersey plume in the shallow water of Liverpool Bay averages less than 17km wide.•The most important influence on the plume's width is the surface circulation in Liverpool Bay.•Ferry measurements are invaluable for estimates of gradients from the river mouth.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-4343
1873-6955
DOI:10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.016