Evaluation of the effectiveness of different indicator PCBs to estimating total PCB concentrations in environmental investigations

• Published in: Chemosphere (Oxford) Vol. 237; p. 124429
• Main Authors: Megson, David, Benoit, Nadine B., Sandau, Courtney D., Chaudhuri, Sri R., Long, Tanya, Coulthard, Emma, Johnson, Glenn W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2019
• Subjects: Aroclors; Aroclors - analysis; data collection; Dioxins - analysis; Environmental Exposure - analysis; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Environmental Pollutants - analysis; fractionation; Humans; Indicators and Reagents; PCBs; persistent organic pollutants; Polychlorinated biphenyls; Polychlorinated Biphenyls - analysis; prediction; risk; Sediments; Water; weathering; World Health Organization; Water; Polychlorinated biphenyls; PCBs; Aroclors; Sediments; Humans
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124429
• ISSN: 0045-6535; 1879-1298

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are one of the most widely studied group of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). There are 209 different PCBs, however not all 209 can currently be individually quantified in one analytical run. This means that a subset of PCBs congeners are often determined and reported. Some of the most commonly reported subsets are the 7 indicator PCBs (28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153 and 180) and the WHO 12 PCBs (77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, 169 and 189). The WHO 12 congeners are co-planar ‘dioxin like’ PCBs that are effective for establishing health risks. The 7 indicator PCBs were selected as some of the most common PCBs across the compositional range of the most common technical mixtures (such as Aroclors), and are used to give an indication of the total PCB concentrations. These groups of indicator PCBs were established several decades ago. However, in the environment commercial mixtures are subject to weathering and fractionation processes, and additional sources of non-Aroclor PCBs are also becoming more important. In this manuscript we use existing large scale comprehensive congener specific datasets to evaluate the effectiveness of indicator PCBs to predict total concentrations and establish if they are still fit for purpose. The results indicate that while these traditional indicators are a useful tool to estimate total concentrations in humans with background exposure there are many instances where they are not fit for purpose and can lead to significant under predictions in total PCB concentrations in environmental matrices. •i7 & i3 PCBs are poor predictors for total PCBs in sediments & water samples.•i7 & i3 PCBs are poor predictors for total PCBs in weathered environmental samples.•i7 & i3 PCBs are good predictors for total PCBs in humans & fresh Aroclor spills.•Many sources of non-Aroclor PCBs would be missed by a reliance on indicator PCBs.