Scrambling to the Edge

.  It has been well known since Saito 1989 that scrambling in Japanese is subject to the Proper Binding Condition (PBC; see Fiengo 1977). As I will show, remnant movement in Japanese is heavily constrained, and in fact, no remnants created by scrambling or topicalization can be moved over extracted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSyntax (Oxford, England) Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 133 - 164
Main Author Hiraiwa, Ken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1368-0005
1467-9612
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00135.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:.  It has been well known since Saito 1989 that scrambling in Japanese is subject to the Proper Binding Condition (PBC; see Fiengo 1977). As I will show, remnant movement in Japanese is heavily constrained, and in fact, no remnants created by scrambling or topicalization can be moved over extracted elements. This article argues that the alleged cases for the PBC in Japanese should be reconsidered in favor of elimination of the PBC, and its effects should be derived from the architecture of the narrow syntax: interactions between Cyclic Multiple Spell‐Out, the Phase Impenetrability Condition, and a refined mechanism of probing. Specifically, I argue that scrambling in Japanese uniformly targets the edge of a phase. Under this theory, ‘‘remnant movement’’ just reduces to an artifact, and it follows that there is no special constraint on remnant movement per se. I will demonstrate that my theory brings significant new empirical advantages and that the same mechanism provides a unified account for various unexplained constraints on scrambling.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FR5MJ49J-C
ArticleID:SYNT135
istex:783884CFAEB87C7EF51938D6347828DE0DF1FF2A
acc
complementizer
pres
cop
part
nom
dative
pst
gen
top
dat
for valuable comments, questions, and/or discussions. I would like to thank Adam Steffanick for proofreading the manuscript. The research reported here was partially funded by the Grant‐in‐Aid for JSPS Fellows (No. 1710271). The abbreviations used in this article are as follows
particle
genitive
c
accusative
pass
copula
past
I am very grateful to Noam Chomsky, Chris Collins, Tomohiro Fujii, Howard Lasnik, Shigeru Miyagawa, David Pesetsky, Norvin Richards, Joachim Sabel, Shoichi Takahashi, Hiroyuki Ura, Akira Watanabe, and three anonymous reviewers for
passive
topic marker.
Syntax
present
nominative
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1368-0005
1467-9612
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00135.x