Geomagnetic Storm Effects on the LEO Proton Flux During Solar Energetic Particle Events
During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions...
Saved in:
Published in | Space Weather Vol. 21; no. 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2023
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions.
Plain Language Summary
Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm.
Key Points
We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions
Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities
During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks |
---|---|
AbstractList | During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L ‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm ( Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm. We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. Plain Language Summary Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm. Key Points We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks Abstract During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. |
Author | Samwel, Susan W. Hada, Tohru Yoshikawa, Akimasa Girgis, Kirolosse M. Matsukiyo, Shuichi Pierrard, Viviane |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kirolosse M. orcidid: 0000-0001-5729-9822 surname: Girgis fullname: Girgis, Kirolosse M. email: girgiskirolosse@esst.kyushu-u.ac.jp organization: Cairo University – sequence: 2 givenname: Tohru surname: Hada fullname: Hada, Tohru organization: Kyushu University – sequence: 3 givenname: Akimasa orcidid: 0000-0003-3735-1325 surname: Yoshikawa fullname: Yoshikawa, Akimasa organization: Kyushu University – sequence: 4 givenname: Shuichi orcidid: 0000-0002-4784-0301 surname: Matsukiyo fullname: Matsukiyo, Shuichi organization: Kyushu University – sequence: 5 givenname: Viviane orcidid: 0000-0001-5014-7682 surname: Pierrard fullname: Pierrard, Viviane organization: Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) – sequence: 6 givenname: Susan W. surname: Samwel fullname: Samwel, Susan W. organization: National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG) |
BookMark | eNqFUctKAzEUDaKgVnd-QMCt1ZvHZCZL0fEBhQpVugyZNKlTpolmUh9_b7QixYWu7rmXc899nH207YO3CB0ROCVA5RkFyiZTACYE30J7pOB0WDIJ2xt4F-33_QKA8oLyPTS9tmGp596m1uBJCnGJa-esST0OHqdHi0f1GN_FkHJ61a3e8OUqtn6OJ6HTEdfexvlX752OOXQW1y_Wp_4A7Tjd9fbwOw7Qw1V9f3EzHI2vby_OR0PDSwFD40xTQDWrrIBGFkVZiZI2TOqi0o5Bw0BzIsBKabXgjskGGuCMSCpoIyWwAbpd686CXqin2C51fFdBt-qrEOJcfS-mGKt45Sg4okuujWlmGdp8rAZXkYJlreO11lMMzyvbJ7UIq-jz-opKEDQL5AcP0MmaZWLo-2jdz1QC6tMGtWlDptNfdNMmndrgU9Rt90_Ta9vZ9z8HqMm0pkRQYB-QLZis |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asr_2023_12_064 crossref_primary_10_3934_geosci_2025007 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105808 10.1029/2019SW002383 10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.015 10.1029/2009sw000488 10.1002/2014JA020300 10.1029/2011JA016733 10.1007/s11214-014-0097-8 10.1029/SP050 10.2514/8.6360 10.1029/2009JA014738 10.1002/2015JA021312 10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00014-5 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90543-6 10.1109/23.903756 10.1007/978-3-319-48660-4 10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.012 10.1029/2022ja031202 10.1109/JRFID.2022.3163441 10.5194/angeo-34-75-2016 10.1002/2016sw001580 10.1029/2009sw000487 10.1016/j.jastp.2004.09.008 10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9 10.1109/TNS.1982.4336495 10.1002/2016JA023338 10.1029/2000JA000212 10.1002/2017JA024009 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.08.009 10.1109/TNS.1983.4333158 10.1002/9781118084328 10.1109/23.819111 10.1051/swsc/2021031 10.1186/s40623-020-01221-2 10.1109/WiSEE50203.2021.9613828 10.1109/TNS.2002.805380 10.1002/2016JA023173 10.1029/2005gl022373 10.2514/6.2011-3739 10.1029/97ja03995 10.1029/2001JA000219 10.1002/2015ja021568 10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1551 10.1029/2010JA015247 10.1002/2017SW001612 10.1029/2009SW000482 10.1029/2004JA010798 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 The Authors. 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors. – notice: 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION 7TG 8FD H8D KL. L7M DOA |
DOI | 10.1029/2023SW003664 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Technology Research Database Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Technology Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Aerospace Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Astronomy & Astrophysics |
EISSN | 1542-7390 |
EndPage | n/a |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153 10_1029_2023SW003664 SWE21620 |
Genre | researchArticle |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: European Association of National Metrology Institutes funderid: 21GRD02 BIOSPHERE – fundername: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science funderid: JP20H01961; JP21H04518; JP22K03707; JP22K21345 |
GroupedDBID | 05W 0R~ 123 1OC 24P 31~ 50Y 6IK 8-1 8R4 8R5 AAESR AAHHS AAJGR AANHP AAZKR ABCUV ABHFT ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCMX ACGFO ACGFS ACPOU ACRPL ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADMGS ADNMO ADXAS AEEZP AEQDE AFBPY AFGKR AFPWT AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AZVAB BDRZF BFHJK BMXJE BRXPI CS3 DCZOG DPXWK EBS EJD FEDTE G-S GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ HVGLF HZ~ IAO IGS IPLJI ITC KZ1 LITHE LMP LOXES LUTES LYRES MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM MY~ O9- OK1 P-X P2P P2W Q2X R.K ROL SUPJJ WBKPD WIN ZZTAW ~02 ~OA AAYXX AGQPQ CITATION M~E 7TG 8FD H8D KL. L7M |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-cfcb508d8e60b95578672b39a58af30b30a4160e99ea64f39b0b04319262b9903 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1542-7390 1539-4964 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:26 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 23:19:54 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:48:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:07 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:15:17 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4760-cfcb508d8e60b95578672b39a58af30b30a4160e99ea64f39b0b04319262b9903 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3735-1325 0000-0001-5014-7682 0000-0002-4784-0301 0000-0001-5729-9822 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153 |
PQID | 2906233802 |
PQPubID | 54316 |
PageCount | 20 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153 proquest_journals_2906233802 crossref_primary_10_1029_2023SW003664 crossref_citationtrail_10_1029_2023SW003664 wiley_primary_10_1029_2023SW003664_SWE21620 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2023 2023-12-00 20231201 2023-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2023 text: December 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Washington |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington |
PublicationTitle | Space Weather |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2011; 116 2014; 119 2005; 110 2000; 47 2011 1978; 11 2015; 120 2023; 128 1998 1999; 46 1983; 30 2004 1962; 32 2005; 67 2001; 106 2016; 34 2020; 18 2002; 49 1997; 102 2002; 2002 2015; 67 1982; 29 2018; 4 2021; 11 2019; 64 2017; 15 2000 2021 2022; 6 2018; 179 2020a; 72 2010; 115 1964 2020b 2002; 107 1994; 14 2017 1984 2005; 32 2009; 7 2014; 184 2014 2017; 122 2022; SM44C‐06 2022; 228 2016; 68 2010; 8 2005; 36 e_1_2_13_24_1 e_1_2_13_49_1 e_1_2_13_26_1 e_1_2_13_47_1 e_1_2_13_20_1 e_1_2_13_45_1 e_1_2_13_22_1 e_1_2_13_8_1 e_1_2_13_41_1 Blakely E. A. (e_1_2_13_7_1) 1984 e_1_2_13_19_1 Burrell M. O. (e_1_2_13_9_1) 1964 e_1_2_13_13_1 e_1_2_13_36_1 e_1_2_13_15_1 e_1_2_13_38_1 e_1_2_13_57_1 e_1_2_13_55_1 e_1_2_13_11_1 e_1_2_13_34_1 Slocum P. L. (e_1_2_13_43_1) 2002 e_1_2_13_53_1 e_1_2_13_30_1 e_1_2_13_4_1 e_1_2_13_2_1 e_1_2_13_29_1 Girgis K. (e_1_2_13_16_1) 2022 e_1_2_13_25_1 e_1_2_13_48_1 e_1_2_13_27_1 e_1_2_13_46_1 e_1_2_13_21_1 e_1_2_13_44_1 e_1_2_13_23_1 e_1_2_13_42_1 e_1_2_13_40_1 National Research Council (e_1_2_13_32_1) 2000 Birdsall C. (e_1_2_13_6_1) 2004 Girgis K. M. (e_1_2_13_17_1) 2018 e_1_2_13_18_1 e_1_2_13_39_1 Curtis H. D. (e_1_2_13_10_1) 2014 e_1_2_13_14_1 e_1_2_13_35_1 Antoni R. (e_1_2_13_3_1) 2017 e_1_2_13_37_1 e_1_2_13_31_1 e_1_2_13_56_1 e_1_2_13_12_1 e_1_2_13_33_1 e_1_2_13_54_1 e_1_2_13_52_1 e_1_2_13_50_1 e_1_2_13_5_1 e_1_2_13_28_1 Wilson J. (e_1_2_13_51_1) 1978 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 34 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 84 article-title: The effects of the big storm events in the first half of 2015 on the radiation belts observed by EPT/PROBA‐v publication-title: Annales Geophysicae – volume: 15 start-page: 1165 issue: 9 year: 2017 end-page: 1176 article-title: Empirical radiation belt models: Comparison with in situ data and implications for environment definition publication-title: Space Weather – volume: 67 issue: 1 year: 2015 article-title: International geomagnetic reference field: The 12th generation publication-title: Earth Planets and Space – volume: 6 start-page: 292 year: 2022 end-page: 298 article-title: Radiation analysis of LEO mission in the South Atlantic anomaly during geomagnetic storm publication-title: IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification – volume: 128 issue: 5 year: 2023 article-title: Proton flux variations during solar energetic particle events, minimum and maximum solar activity, and splitting of the proton belt in the South Atlantic anomaly publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 49 start-page: 2782 issue: 6 year: 2002 end-page: 2787 article-title: In‐flight observations of the radiation environment and its effects on devices in the SAC‐C polar orbit publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science – volume: 102 start-page: 14087 issue: A7 year: 1997 end-page: 14102 article-title: Simulations of radiation belt formation during storm sudden commencements publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 36 start-page: 2012 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 2020 article-title: A review of geomagnetic cutoff rigidities for Earth‐orbiting spacecraft publication-title: Advances in Space Research – volume: 68 issue: 1 year: 2016 article-title: The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: “The St. Patrick’s Day event (17 March 2015)” publication-title: Earth Planets and Space – volume: 120 start-page: 4475 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 4486 article-title: Short‐term variations of the inner radiation belt in the South Atlantic Anomaly publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 119 start-page: 9658 issue: 12 year: 2014 end-page: 9669 article-title: Solar cycle variations of trapped proton flux in the inner radiation belt publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – year: 2014 – volume: 32 start-page: 1668 issue: 11 year: 1962 end-page: 1676 article-title: Evaluation of space radiation doses received within a typical spacecraft publication-title: American Rocket Society Journal – volume: 115 issue: A8 year: 2010 article-title: A split in the outer radiation belt by magnetopause shadowing: Test particle simulations publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – year: 1998 – start-page: 58 year: 2004 end-page: 59 – start-page: 27 year: 2021 end-page: 30 – volume: 15 start-page: 1475 issue: 11 year: 2017 end-page: 1489 article-title: Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during the ESA EXPOSE‐r2 mission in 2014‐2016 publication-title: Space Weather – volume: 8 issue: 5 year: 2010 article-title: Solar energetic particle cutoff variations during the 29–31 October 2003 geomagnetic storm publication-title: Space Weather – volume: 30 start-page: 4481 issue: 6 year: 1983 end-page: 4485 article-title: Proton upsets in orbit publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science – start-page: 311 year: 2014 end-page: 344 – volume: 228 start-page: 1 issue: 105808 year: 2022 end-page: 9 article-title: Seasonal variation and geomagnetic storm index effects on the proton flux response in the South Atlantic Anomaly by test particle simulations publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics – volume: 46 start-page: 1481 issue: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 1485 article-title: Probability model for worst case solar proton event fluences publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science – volume: 11 start-page: 33 year: 1978 end-page: 116 – volume: 122 start-page: 4023 issue: 4 year: 2017 end-page: 4036 article-title: A comparison of the ground magnetic responses during the 2013 and 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storms publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 67 start-page: 719 issue: 7 year: 2005 end-page: 727 article-title: The influence of a southward and northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field on the geomagnetic cut‐off of cosmic rays, on the mirror points positions of geomagnetically trapped particles, and on their rate of precipitations in the atmosphere publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics – volume: 2002 year: 2002 – year: 1964 – volume: 11 start-page: 1 issue: 48 year: 2021 end-page: 10 article-title: Inner radiation belt simulations of the proton flux response in the South Atlantic anomaly during the geomagnetic storm of 15 May 2005 publication-title: Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate – volume: 179 start-page: 251 year: 2018 end-page: 260 article-title: South‐Atlantic anomaly magnetic storms effects as observed outside the international space station in 2008–2016 publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics – volume: 110 issue: A3 year: 2005 article-title: Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 184 start-page: 87 issue: 1–4 year: 2014 end-page: 106 article-title: The energetic particle telescope: First results publication-title: Space Science Reviews – volume: 107 start-page: SMP12‐1 issue: A8 year: 2002 end-page: SMP12‐15 article-title: A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn‐dusk asymmetry 1. Mathematical structure publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – year: 2000 – volume: 7 issue: 12 year: 2009 article-title: Space radiation environment forecast for EGYPTSAT‐2 satellite publication-title: Space Weather – start-page: 53 year: 2017 end-page: 60 – volume: 29 start-page: 2055 issue: 6 year: 1982 end-page: 2063 article-title: Calculation of cosmic‐ray induced soft upsets and scaling in VLSI devices publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science – volume: 116 issue: A10 year: 2011 article-title: Response of high‐energy protons of the inner radiation belt to large magnetic storms publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 32 issue: 6 year: 2005 article-title: Impulsive solar energetic ion trapping in the magnetosphere during geomagnetic storms publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – volume: 64 start-page: 801 issue: 3 year: 2019 end-page: 813 article-title: Potential role of energetic particle observations in geomagnetic storm forecasting publication-title: Advances in Space Research – volume: 8 issue: 3 year: 2010 article-title: Geomagnetic influence on aircraft radiation exposure during a solar energetic particle event in October 2003 publication-title: Space Weather – volume: SM44C‐06 year: 2022 – start-page: 310 year: 1984 – volume: 122 start-page: 4553 issue: 4 year: 2017 end-page: 4570 article-title: Electrodynamic disturbances in the Brazilian equatorial and low‐latitude ionosphere on St. Patrick's Day storm of 17 march 2015 publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 72 start-page: 1 issue: 100 year: 2020a end-page: 17 article-title: Solar wind parameter and seasonal variation effects on the South Atlantic anomaly using Tsyganenko Models publication-title: Earth Planets and Space – volume: 47 start-page: 2218 issue: 6 year: 2000 end-page: 2223 article-title: Characterizing solar proton energy spectra for radiation effects applications publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science – volume: 122 start-page: 368 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 392 article-title: Cross‐scale observations of the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm: THEMIS, Van Allen Probes, and TWINS publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 106 start-page: 30011 issue: A12 year: 2001 end-page: 30022 article-title: Observations of geomagnetic cutoff variations during solar energetic particle events and implications for the radiation environment at the space station publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 14 start-page: 1994 issue: 10 year: 1994 end-page: 2796 article-title: Geomagnetic cutoffs: A review for space dosimetry applications publication-title: Advances in Space Research – volume: 4 start-page: 36 year: 2018 end-page: 41 – volume: 115 issue: A8 year: 2010 article-title: Injection and loss of inner radiation belt protons during solar proton events and magnetic storms publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – year: 2020b – volume: 120 start-page: 9323 issue: 11 year: 2015 end-page: 9333 article-title: Simulations of inner radiation belt proton loss during geomagnetic storms publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics – volume: 18 issue: 8 year: 2020 article-title: Geomagnetic storm‐induced plasma density enhancements in the southern polar ionospheric region: A comparative study using St. Patrick's Day storms of 2013 and 2015 publication-title: Space Weather – ident: e_1_2_13_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105808 – ident: e_1_2_13_42_1 doi: 10.1029/2019SW002383 – ident: e_1_2_13_45_1 doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.015 – ident: e_1_2_13_27_1 doi: 10.1029/2009sw000488 – ident: e_1_2_13_38_1 doi: 10.1002/2014JA020300 – ident: e_1_2_13_57_1 doi: 10.1029/2011JA016733 – ident: e_1_2_13_36_1 doi: 10.1007/s11214-014-0097-8 – ident: e_1_2_13_46_1 doi: 10.1029/SP050 – ident: e_1_2_13_4_1 doi: 10.2514/8.6360 – ident: e_1_2_13_39_1 doi: 10.1029/2009JA014738 – volume-title: AGU fall meeting abstracts year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_13_43_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_56_1 doi: 10.1002/2015JA021312 – ident: e_1_2_13_8_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00014-5 – ident: e_1_2_13_44_1 doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90543-6 – ident: e_1_2_13_53_1 doi: 10.1109/23.903756 – start-page: 53 volume-title: Applied physics of external radiation exposure year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_13_3_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48660-4 – ident: e_1_2_13_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.012 – ident: e_1_2_13_35_1 doi: 10.1029/2022ja031202 – start-page: 310 volume-title: Advances in radiation biology year: 1984 ident: e_1_2_13_7_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_23_1 doi: 10.1109/JRFID.2022.3163441 – ident: e_1_2_13_37_1 doi: 10.5194/angeo-34-75-2016 – ident: e_1_2_13_12_1 doi: 10.1002/2016sw001580 – ident: e_1_2_13_31_1 doi: 10.1029/2009sw000487 – ident: e_1_2_13_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2004.09.008 – volume-title: Radiation and the international space station: Recommendations to reduce risks year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_13_32_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_47_1 doi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9 – volume-title: Proton flux modeling due to solar proton injections during geomagnetic storms year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_13_16_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_34_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.1982.4336495 – ident: e_1_2_13_55_1 doi: 10.1002/2016JA023338 – ident: e_1_2_13_29_1 doi: 10.1029/2000JA000212 – ident: e_1_2_13_50_1 doi: 10.1002/2017JA024009 – ident: e_1_2_13_11_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.08.009 – ident: e_1_2_13_5_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.1983.4333158 – ident: e_1_2_13_33_1 doi: 10.1002/9781118084328 – ident: e_1_2_13_54_1 doi: 10.1109/23.819111 – ident: e_1_2_13_22_1 doi: 10.1051/swsc/2021031 – start-page: 33 volume-title: Workshop on the radiation environment of the satellite power system year: 1978 ident: e_1_2_13_51_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_18_1 doi: 10.1186/s40623-020-01221-2 – ident: e_1_2_13_20_1 doi: 10.1109/WiSEE50203.2021.9613828 – ident: e_1_2_13_15_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2002.805380 – ident: e_1_2_13_24_1 doi: 10.1002/2016JA023173 – ident: e_1_2_13_26_1 doi: 10.1029/2005gl022373 – ident: e_1_2_13_30_1 doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3739 – ident: e_1_2_13_25_1 doi: 10.1029/97ja03995 – ident: e_1_2_13_48_1 doi: 10.1029/2001JA000219 – ident: e_1_2_13_14_1 doi: 10.1002/2015ja021568 – start-page: 36 volume-title: International exchange and innovation conference on engineering & sciences (IEICES) year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_13_17_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_52_1 doi: 10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y – start-page: 58 volume-title: Plasma physics via computer simulation year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_13_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_19_1 doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1551 – volume-title: The calculation of proton penetration and dose rates (techreport No. NASA‐TM‐X‐53063) year: 1964 ident: e_1_2_13_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_13_41_1 doi: 10.1029/2010JA015247 – ident: e_1_2_13_13_1 doi: 10.1002/2017SW001612 – ident: e_1_2_13_40_1 doi: 10.1029/2009SW000482 – ident: e_1_2_13_49_1 doi: 10.1029/2004JA010798 – volume-title: Orbital mechanics for engineering students year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_13_10_1 |
SSID | ssj0024524 ssj0000866621 |
Score | 2.3413353 |
Snippet | During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation... Abstract During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
SubjectTerms | Astronauts DST Index Earth orbits Earth surface Energetic particles Fluctuations Geomagnetic field Geomagnetic storm effects Geomagnetic storms Geomagnetism Inner radiation belt Latitude Low earth orbits Magnetic field configurations Magnetic fields Magnetic storms Mathematical models Proton flux Radiation Radiation belts Radiation dosage Relativistic particles Satellite observation Satellite technology Satellites Single event upsets Solar energetic particles Solar energy Solar magnetic field Solar particle events Solar proton flux Solar protons Solar storms Storm effects Storms Trajectories |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1NTxsxELVKeumlKoWKUEA-FC5oheO1nd1jgE1R1ZZIAYXbyvbauZBdlAUJ_j0zXhPCoZW4rawZyZrxx5tZzxtCfhjvZap9laRKV4mQXCRaWJtIgEgDL-xQhYT-n7_q4lr8upE3MeGGtTAdP8Qq4YY7I5zXuMG1aSPZAHJkYt_v6Qz5VJTYIB-xuha587mYvHLtya6prRSAIiG4jw_fQf9kXfvNlRSY-9_AzXXQGm6d8RfyOcJFOur8u0k-uPor2Rm1mMBuFk_0iIbvLj_RbpHZT9cs9LzG0kQ6hXh6QTt-4pY2NQWwR38Xl3SybADy0fHtwyM9D3WKdIohLi2wEjDoTuKSogU-iGy3yfW4uDq7SGLvhMQKsG9ivTWAvarMKWZyCftSDblJcy0z7VNmUqYBijGX504r4dPcMIM8O0gfaOCGSr-RXt3UbofQITLOKztw1uQCImntZJYzayvLPGZ8--T4xXyljcTi2N_itgw_uHlerhu7Tw5X0ncdocY_5E7REysZpMEOA81yXkYTlBBfi8xz5gd6KLS1poJPfAijmc_gLO-TvRc_lnFvtiUS3HPQZBxmHnz734mU01nBB4qz3XdJfyefcLx7-bJHevfLB7cP-OXeHIRF-gz6ReTX priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Geomagnetic Storm Effects on the LEO Proton Flux During Solar Energetic Particle Events |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2023SW003664 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906233802 https://doaj.org/article/33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1BT9swFLYGu3BBgw1R1lU-sF1QNNdx3PhYIKWatlKtQ-UW2Y7NhSaItBL8-73npKgcgAs3K7KTp_fsvO89P38m5Nh4n8TaF1EsdRGJhItIC2ujBCBS3ws7kCGh_2cix1fi13VyvXHVF9aENfTAjeJ-QgglUs-Z7-uB0NaaAppY66CZT2G54t8XfN46mFqz7MFH2zJ3xhVG-PFsjtwrUjxzQIGn_xm43ISowceMPpHdFhzSYSPUHvngyn1yOKwxXV0tHukPGtpNNqL-TOYXrlromxIPItIZRM8L2rAR17QqKUA7-ju7pNP7CgAeHd2uHuh5OJVIZxjQ0gzP_YWx01YPNMPyx_oLuRpl_87GUXtTQmQFaDOy3hpAWkXqJDMqgVUoB9zESiep9jEzMdMAvJhTymkpfKwMM8iqg2SBBvxRfEC2y6p0h4QOkF9e2r6zRgmIm7VLUsWsLSzzmN_tkJO1-nLb0ojjbRa3edjO5irfVHaHfH_qfdfQZ7zQ7xQt8dQHSa_DA5gKeauC_K2p0CHdtR3zdiXWOdLZcxjJOEgebPuqIPlsnvG-5OzoPST6Snbw5U35S5dsL-9X7huAmKXpkS0upj3y8TSbTP_2wuz9D-Jn7qs |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9QwELWgHOCCKB_qQik-ABcU4XVsJzmWNssC27LSttreLNuxe-kmaNNK8O-ZcdxlewCJmxWNJWvGY7-ZeN4Q8taGIHMTmixXpsmE5CIzwrlMAkQaB-EKFRP6J6dqei6-XsiL1OcUa2EGfohNwg09I57X6OCYkE5sA0iSiY2_F0skVFHiPnkgFC_QM7mY_yHbk0NXWykARkJ0n16-w_yP27Pv3EmRuv8O3txGrfHamTwhjxNepIeDgXfJPd8-JXuHPWawu9Uv-p7G8ZCg6J-R5Wffrcxli7WJdAEB9YoOBMU97VoKaI_O6u90vu4A89HJ1c1PehwLFekCY1xaYylgnDtPe4rW-CKyf07OJ_XZ0TRLzRMyJ0DBmQvOAvhqSq-YrSQ4piq4zSsjSxNyZnNmAIsxX1XeKBHyyjKLRDvIH2jhispfkJ22a_0eoQVSzis39s5WAkJp42VZMecaxwKmfEfkw636tEvM4tjg4krHP9y80tvKHpF3G-kfA6PGX-Q-oSU2MsiDHT9060udVKAhwBZl4CyMTSGMc7aBIb6EMSyUcJiPyP6tHXVyzl4jwz2HmYzDyqNt_7kQvVjWfKw4e_lf0m_Iw-nZyUzPvpx-e0UeoczwDGaf7Fyvb_xrADPX9iBu2N9k9-hD |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3fT9swELZGJ028IPYDUdYNP2x7maK5ie0mjzDSsY2xSh0qb5bt2H2hCWpAGv89d44p5QEk3qzoTrLOPvu7y91nQj4Z70WmfZVkUlcJFylPNLc2EQCRhp7bkQwJ_T-n8viM_zoX5zHhhr0wHT_EKuGGnhHOa3Twy8pHsgHkyMR3v6cz5FORfIO8DP_7kNmZT-659kT3qK3ggCIhuI-F76D_bV37wZUUmPsfwM110BpunfE22YpwkR506_uavHD1G7J70GICu1nc0C80jLv8RPuWzH64ZqHnNbYm0inE0wva8RO3tKkpgD16Uv6lk2UDkI-OL67_06PQp0inGOLSEjsBg-4kbilaYkFk-46cjct_34-T-HZCYjnYN7HeGsBeVe4kM4UAv5Sj1GSFFrn2GTMZ0wDFmCsKpyX3WWGYQZ4dpA80cENlO6RXN7XbJXSEjPPSDp01BYdIWjuRF8zayjKPGd8--XpnPmUjsTi-b3Ghwg_utFDrxu6Tzyvpy45Q4xG5Q1yJlQzSYIcPzXKuogkUxNc89ynzQz3i2lpTwRALYTTzOZzlfTK4W0cVfbNVSHCfgiZLYeZhbZ-ciJrOynQoU7b3LOl98mpyNFYnP09_vyebKNIVwQxI72p57T4AlLkyH8N-vQUWl-d1 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geomagnetic+Storm+Effects+on+the+LEO+Proton+Flux+During+Solar+Energetic+Particle+Events&rft.jtitle=Space+weather&rft.au=Girgis%2C+Kirolosse+M.&rft.au=Hada%2C+Tohru&rft.au=Yoshikawa%2C+Akimasa&rft.au=Matsukiyo%2C+Shuichi&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029%2F2023SW003664&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1029_2023SW003664 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon |