Geomagnetic Storm Effects on the LEO Proton Flux During Solar Energetic Particle Events

During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSpace Weather Vol. 21; no. 12
Main Authors Girgis, Kirolosse M., Hada, Tohru, Yoshikawa, Akimasa, Matsukiyo, Shuichi, Pierrard, Viviane, Samwel, Susan W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2023
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. Plain Language Summary Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm. Key Points We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks
AbstractList During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions.
During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L ‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm ( Dst  = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm. We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks
During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions. Plain Language Summary Solar energetic particles are high‐energy particles emitted from the Sun during intense activity. When they reach the Earth, they become trapped in its magnetic field. In some cases, these trapped solar particles can penetrate deeper toward the Earth's surface when some fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field occur. The impact of solar particles on satellite technologies and astronauts is significant and dangerous. In this work, we reproduced this phenomenon by developing a numerical code to calculate the solar proton trajectories inside the Earth's magnetic field according to several geomagnetic conditions. Our new results successfully produced the same physical process and did agree with other methodologies, such as satellite observations. Afterward, we estimated the resulting radiation environment of a Low‐Earth Orbit mission. We found that a satellite could suffer more radiation risks of around 20% if a Solar Energetic Particle event occurred during an intense geomagnetic storm. Key Points We have numerically modeled the Low‐Earth Orbit proton flux due to precipitated solar protons for different geomagnetic storm conditions Our test particle simulations reproduced the proton flux enhancement at high latitudes, agreeing with observations and cutoff rigidities During a stronger geomagnetic storm and solar energetic particle event, a spacecraft that enters the polar cap region would be subject to more radiation risks
Abstract During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation belt. We reproduced this phenomenon by modeling the proton flux distribution at the Low‐Earth Orbit (LEO) for different geomagnetic conditions during solar particle events. We developed a three‐dimensional relativistic test particle simulation code to compute the 70–180 MeV solar proton Lorentz trajectories in low L‐shell range from 1 to 3. The Tsyganenko model (T01) generated the background static magnetic field with the IGRF (v12) model. We have selected three Dst index values: −7, −150, and −210 nT, to define quiet time, strong, and severe geomagnetic storms and to generate the corresponding inner magnetic field configurations. Our results showed that the simulated solar proton flux was more enhanced in the high‐latitude regions and more expanded toward the lower latitude range as long as the geomagnetic storm was intensified. Satellite observations and geomagnetic cutoff rigidities confirmed the numerical results. Furthermore, the LEO proton flux distribution was deformed, so the structure of the proton flux inside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) became longitudinally extended as the Dst index decreased. Moreover, we have assessed the corresponding radiation environment of the LEO mission. We realized that, for a higher inclined LEO mission during an intense geomagnetic storm (Dst = −210 nT), the probability of the occurrence of the Single Event Upset (SEU) rates increased by 19% and the estimated accumulated absorbed radiation doses increased by 17% in comparison with quiet conditions.
Author Samwel, Susan W.
Hada, Tohru
Yoshikawa, Akimasa
Girgis, Kirolosse M.
Matsukiyo, Shuichi
Pierrard, Viviane
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kirolosse M.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5729-9822
  surname: Girgis
  fullname: Girgis, Kirolosse M.
  email: girgiskirolosse@esst.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  organization: Cairo University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tohru
  surname: Hada
  fullname: Hada, Tohru
  organization: Kyushu University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Akimasa
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3735-1325
  surname: Yoshikawa
  fullname: Yoshikawa, Akimasa
  organization: Kyushu University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Shuichi
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4784-0301
  surname: Matsukiyo
  fullname: Matsukiyo, Shuichi
  organization: Kyushu University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Viviane
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5014-7682
  surname: Pierrard
  fullname: Pierrard, Viviane
  organization: Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Susan W.
  surname: Samwel
  fullname: Samwel, Susan W.
  organization: National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)
BookMark eNqFUctKAzEUDaKgVnd-QMCt1ZvHZCZL0fEBhQpVugyZNKlTpolmUh9_b7QixYWu7rmXc899nH207YO3CB0ROCVA5RkFyiZTACYE30J7pOB0WDIJ2xt4F-33_QKA8oLyPTS9tmGp596m1uBJCnGJa-esST0OHqdHi0f1GN_FkHJ61a3e8OUqtn6OJ6HTEdfexvlX752OOXQW1y_Wp_4A7Tjd9fbwOw7Qw1V9f3EzHI2vby_OR0PDSwFD40xTQDWrrIBGFkVZiZI2TOqi0o5Bw0BzIsBKabXgjskGGuCMSCpoIyWwAbpd686CXqin2C51fFdBt-qrEOJcfS-mGKt45Sg4okuujWlmGdp8rAZXkYJlreO11lMMzyvbJ7UIq-jz-opKEDQL5AcP0MmaZWLo-2jdz1QC6tMGtWlDptNfdNMmndrgU9Rt90_Ta9vZ9z8HqMm0pkRQYB-QLZis
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asr_2023_12_064
crossref_primary_10_3934_geosci_2025007
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105808
10.1029/2019SW002383
10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.015
10.1029/2009sw000488
10.1002/2014JA020300
10.1029/2011JA016733
10.1007/s11214-014-0097-8
10.1029/SP050
10.2514/8.6360
10.1029/2009JA014738
10.1002/2015JA021312
10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00014-5
10.1016/0273-1177(94)90543-6
10.1109/23.903756
10.1007/978-3-319-48660-4
10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.012
10.1029/2022ja031202
10.1109/JRFID.2022.3163441
10.5194/angeo-34-75-2016
10.1002/2016sw001580
10.1029/2009sw000487
10.1016/j.jastp.2004.09.008
10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9
10.1109/TNS.1982.4336495
10.1002/2016JA023338
10.1029/2000JA000212
10.1002/2017JA024009
10.1016/j.jastp.2018.08.009
10.1109/TNS.1983.4333158
10.1002/9781118084328
10.1109/23.819111
10.1051/swsc/2021031
10.1186/s40623-020-01221-2
10.1109/WiSEE50203.2021.9613828
10.1109/TNS.2002.805380
10.1002/2016JA023173
10.1029/2005gl022373
10.2514/6.2011-3739
10.1029/97ja03995
10.1029/2001JA000219
10.1002/2015ja021568
10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y
10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1551
10.1029/2010JA015247
10.1002/2017SW001612
10.1029/2009SW000482
10.1029/2004JA010798
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 The Authors.
2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 The Authors.
– notice: 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
7TG
8FD
H8D
KL.
L7M
DOA
DOI 10.1029/2023SW003664
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Aerospace Database
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Aerospace Database
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Aerospace Database
CrossRef


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Astronomy & Astrophysics
EISSN 1542-7390
EndPage n/a
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153
10_1029_2023SW003664
SWE21620
Genre researchArticle
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: European Association of National Metrology Institutes
  funderid: 21GRD02 BIOSPHERE
– fundername: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  funderid: JP20H01961; JP21H04518; JP22K03707; JP22K21345
GroupedDBID 05W
0R~
123
1OC
24P
31~
50Y
6IK
8-1
8R4
8R5
AAESR
AAHHS
AAJGR
AANHP
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABHFT
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADXAS
AEEZP
AEQDE
AFBPY
AFGKR
AFPWT
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AZVAB
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BRXPI
CS3
DCZOG
DPXWK
EBS
EJD
FEDTE
G-S
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HVGLF
HZ~
IAO
IGS
IPLJI
ITC
KZ1
LITHE
LMP
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
MY~
O9-
OK1
P-X
P2P
P2W
Q2X
R.K
ROL
SUPJJ
WBKPD
WIN
ZZTAW
~02
~OA
AAYXX
AGQPQ
CITATION
M~E
7TG
8FD
H8D
KL.
L7M
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-cfcb508d8e60b95578672b39a58af30b30a4160e99ea64f39b0b04319262b9903
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1542-7390
1539-4964
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:26 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:19:54 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:48:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:07 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:15:17 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4760-cfcb508d8e60b95578672b39a58af30b30a4160e99ea64f39b0b04319262b9903
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0003-3735-1325
0000-0001-5014-7682
0000-0002-4784-0301
0000-0001-5729-9822
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153
PQID 2906233802
PQPubID 54316
PageCount 20
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153
proquest_journals_2906233802
crossref_primary_10_1029_2023SW003664
crossref_citationtrail_10_1029_2023SW003664
wiley_primary_10_1029_2023SW003664_SWE21620
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2023
2023-12-00
20231201
2023-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: December 2023
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Washington
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington
PublicationTitle Space Weather
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2011; 116
2014; 119
2005; 110
2000; 47
2011
1978; 11
2015; 120
2023; 128
1998
1999; 46
1983; 30
2004
1962; 32
2005; 67
2001; 106
2016; 34
2020; 18
2002; 49
1997; 102
2002; 2002
2015; 67
1982; 29
2018; 4
2021; 11
2019; 64
2017; 15
2000
2021
2022; 6
2018; 179
2020a; 72
2010; 115
1964
2020b
2002; 107
1994; 14
2017
1984
2005; 32
2009; 7
2014; 184
2014
2017; 122
2022; SM44C‐06
2022; 228
2016; 68
2010; 8
2005; 36
e_1_2_13_24_1
e_1_2_13_49_1
e_1_2_13_26_1
e_1_2_13_47_1
e_1_2_13_20_1
e_1_2_13_45_1
e_1_2_13_22_1
e_1_2_13_8_1
e_1_2_13_41_1
Blakely E. A. (e_1_2_13_7_1) 1984
e_1_2_13_19_1
Burrell M. O. (e_1_2_13_9_1) 1964
e_1_2_13_13_1
e_1_2_13_36_1
e_1_2_13_15_1
e_1_2_13_38_1
e_1_2_13_57_1
e_1_2_13_55_1
e_1_2_13_11_1
e_1_2_13_34_1
Slocum P. L. (e_1_2_13_43_1) 2002
e_1_2_13_53_1
e_1_2_13_30_1
e_1_2_13_4_1
e_1_2_13_2_1
e_1_2_13_29_1
Girgis K. (e_1_2_13_16_1) 2022
e_1_2_13_25_1
e_1_2_13_48_1
e_1_2_13_27_1
e_1_2_13_46_1
e_1_2_13_21_1
e_1_2_13_44_1
e_1_2_13_23_1
e_1_2_13_42_1
e_1_2_13_40_1
National Research Council (e_1_2_13_32_1) 2000
Birdsall C. (e_1_2_13_6_1) 2004
Girgis K. M. (e_1_2_13_17_1) 2018
e_1_2_13_18_1
e_1_2_13_39_1
Curtis H. D. (e_1_2_13_10_1) 2014
e_1_2_13_14_1
e_1_2_13_35_1
Antoni R. (e_1_2_13_3_1) 2017
e_1_2_13_37_1
e_1_2_13_31_1
e_1_2_13_56_1
e_1_2_13_12_1
e_1_2_13_33_1
e_1_2_13_54_1
e_1_2_13_52_1
e_1_2_13_50_1
e_1_2_13_5_1
e_1_2_13_28_1
Wilson J. (e_1_2_13_51_1) 1978
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 34
  start-page: 75
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 84
  article-title: The effects of the big storm events in the first half of 2015 on the radiation belts observed by EPT/PROBA‐v
  publication-title: Annales Geophysicae
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1165
  issue: 9
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1176
  article-title: Empirical radiation belt models: Comparison with in situ data and implications for environment definition
  publication-title: Space Weather
– volume: 67
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  article-title: International geomagnetic reference field: The 12th generation
  publication-title: Earth Planets and Space
– volume: 6
  start-page: 292
  year: 2022
  end-page: 298
  article-title: Radiation analysis of LEO mission in the South Atlantic anomaly during geomagnetic storm
  publication-title: IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification
– volume: 128
  issue: 5
  year: 2023
  article-title: Proton flux variations during solar energetic particle events, minimum and maximum solar activity, and splitting of the proton belt in the South Atlantic anomaly
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 49
  start-page: 2782
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2787
  article-title: In‐flight observations of the radiation environment and its effects on devices in the SAC‐C polar orbit
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
– volume: 102
  start-page: 14087
  issue: A7
  year: 1997
  end-page: 14102
  article-title: Simulations of radiation belt formation during storm sudden commencements
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2012
  issue: 10
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2020
  article-title: A review of geomagnetic cutoff rigidities for Earth‐orbiting spacecraft
  publication-title: Advances in Space Research
– volume: 68
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  article-title: The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: “The St. Patrick’s Day event (17 March 2015)”
  publication-title: Earth Planets and Space
– volume: 120
  start-page: 4475
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  end-page: 4486
  article-title: Short‐term variations of the inner radiation belt in the South Atlantic Anomaly
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 119
  start-page: 9658
  issue: 12
  year: 2014
  end-page: 9669
  article-title: Solar cycle variations of trapped proton flux in the inner radiation belt
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– year: 2014
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1668
  issue: 11
  year: 1962
  end-page: 1676
  article-title: Evaluation of space radiation doses received within a typical spacecraft
  publication-title: American Rocket Society Journal
– volume: 115
  issue: A8
  year: 2010
  article-title: A split in the outer radiation belt by magnetopause shadowing: Test particle simulations
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– year: 1998
– start-page: 58
  year: 2004
  end-page: 59
– start-page: 27
  year: 2021
  end-page: 30
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1475
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1489
  article-title: Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during the ESA EXPOSE‐r2 mission in 2014‐2016
  publication-title: Space Weather
– volume: 8
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  article-title: Solar energetic particle cutoff variations during the 29–31 October 2003 geomagnetic storm
  publication-title: Space Weather
– volume: 30
  start-page: 4481
  issue: 6
  year: 1983
  end-page: 4485
  article-title: Proton upsets in orbit
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
– start-page: 311
  year: 2014
  end-page: 344
– volume: 228
  start-page: 1
  issue: 105808
  year: 2022
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Seasonal variation and geomagnetic storm index effects on the proton flux response in the South Atlantic Anomaly by test particle simulations
  publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1481
  issue: 6
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1485
  article-title: Probability model for worst case solar proton event fluences
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
– volume: 11
  start-page: 33
  year: 1978
  end-page: 116
– volume: 122
  start-page: 4023
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 4036
  article-title: A comparison of the ground magnetic responses during the 2013 and 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storms
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 67
  start-page: 719
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  end-page: 727
  article-title: The influence of a southward and northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field on the geomagnetic cut‐off of cosmic rays, on the mirror points positions of geomagnetically trapped particles, and on their rate of precipitations in the atmosphere
  publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics
– volume: 2002
  year: 2002
– year: 1964
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  issue: 48
  year: 2021
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Inner radiation belt simulations of the proton flux response in the South Atlantic anomaly during the geomagnetic storm of 15 May 2005
  publication-title: Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
– volume: 179
  start-page: 251
  year: 2018
  end-page: 260
  article-title: South‐Atlantic anomaly magnetic storms effects as observed outside the international space station in 2008–2016
  publication-title: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar‐Terrestrial Physics
– volume: 110
  issue: A3
  year: 2005
  article-title: Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 184
  start-page: 87
  issue: 1–4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 106
  article-title: The energetic particle telescope: First results
  publication-title: Space Science Reviews
– volume: 107
  start-page: SMP12‐1
  issue: A8
  year: 2002
  end-page: SMP12‐15
  article-title: A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn‐dusk asymmetry 1. Mathematical structure
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– year: 2000
– volume: 7
  issue: 12
  year: 2009
  article-title: Space radiation environment forecast for EGYPTSAT‐2 satellite
  publication-title: Space Weather
– start-page: 53
  year: 2017
  end-page: 60
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2055
  issue: 6
  year: 1982
  end-page: 2063
  article-title: Calculation of cosmic‐ray induced soft upsets and scaling in VLSI devices
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
– volume: 116
  issue: A10
  year: 2011
  article-title: Response of high‐energy protons of the inner radiation belt to large magnetic storms
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 32
  issue: 6
  year: 2005
  article-title: Impulsive solar energetic ion trapping in the magnetosphere during geomagnetic storms
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 64
  start-page: 801
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  end-page: 813
  article-title: Potential role of energetic particle observations in geomagnetic storm forecasting
  publication-title: Advances in Space Research
– volume: 8
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  article-title: Geomagnetic influence on aircraft radiation exposure during a solar energetic particle event in October 2003
  publication-title: Space Weather
– volume: SM44C‐06
  year: 2022
– start-page: 310
  year: 1984
– volume: 122
  start-page: 4553
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 4570
  article-title: Electrodynamic disturbances in the Brazilian equatorial and low‐latitude ionosphere on St. Patrick's Day storm of 17 march 2015
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1
  issue: 100
  year: 2020a
  end-page: 17
  article-title: Solar wind parameter and seasonal variation effects on the South Atlantic anomaly using Tsyganenko Models
  publication-title: Earth Planets and Space
– volume: 47
  start-page: 2218
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  end-page: 2223
  article-title: Characterizing solar proton energy spectra for radiation effects applications
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
– volume: 122
  start-page: 368
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 392
  article-title: Cross‐scale observations of the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm: THEMIS, Van Allen Probes, and TWINS
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 106
  start-page: 30011
  issue: A12
  year: 2001
  end-page: 30022
  article-title: Observations of geomagnetic cutoff variations during solar energetic particle events and implications for the radiation environment at the space station
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1994
  issue: 10
  year: 1994
  end-page: 2796
  article-title: Geomagnetic cutoffs: A review for space dosimetry applications
  publication-title: Advances in Space Research
– volume: 4
  start-page: 36
  year: 2018
  end-page: 41
– volume: 115
  issue: A8
  year: 2010
  article-title: Injection and loss of inner radiation belt protons during solar proton events and magnetic storms
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– year: 2020b
– volume: 120
  start-page: 9323
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  end-page: 9333
  article-title: Simulations of inner radiation belt proton loss during geomagnetic storms
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
– volume: 18
  issue: 8
  year: 2020
  article-title: Geomagnetic storm‐induced plasma density enhancements in the southern polar ionospheric region: A comparative study using St. Patrick's Day storms of 2013 and 2015
  publication-title: Space Weather
– ident: e_1_2_13_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105808
– ident: e_1_2_13_42_1
  doi: 10.1029/2019SW002383
– ident: e_1_2_13_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.015
– ident: e_1_2_13_27_1
  doi: 10.1029/2009sw000488
– ident: e_1_2_13_38_1
  doi: 10.1002/2014JA020300
– ident: e_1_2_13_57_1
  doi: 10.1029/2011JA016733
– ident: e_1_2_13_36_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11214-014-0097-8
– ident: e_1_2_13_46_1
  doi: 10.1029/SP050
– ident: e_1_2_13_4_1
  doi: 10.2514/8.6360
– ident: e_1_2_13_39_1
  doi: 10.1029/2009JA014738
– volume-title: AGU fall meeting abstracts
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_13_43_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_56_1
  doi: 10.1002/2015JA021312
– ident: e_1_2_13_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00014-5
– ident: e_1_2_13_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90543-6
– ident: e_1_2_13_53_1
  doi: 10.1109/23.903756
– start-page: 53
  volume-title: Applied physics of external radiation exposure
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_13_3_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48660-4
– ident: e_1_2_13_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.012
– ident: e_1_2_13_35_1
  doi: 10.1029/2022ja031202
– start-page: 310
  volume-title: Advances in radiation biology
  year: 1984
  ident: e_1_2_13_7_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_23_1
  doi: 10.1109/JRFID.2022.3163441
– ident: e_1_2_13_37_1
  doi: 10.5194/angeo-34-75-2016
– ident: e_1_2_13_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/2016sw001580
– ident: e_1_2_13_31_1
  doi: 10.1029/2009sw000487
– ident: e_1_2_13_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2004.09.008
– volume-title: Radiation and the international space station: Recommendations to reduce risks
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_13_32_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_47_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9
– volume-title: Proton flux modeling due to solar proton injections during geomagnetic storms
  year: 2022
  ident: e_1_2_13_16_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_34_1
  doi: 10.1109/TNS.1982.4336495
– ident: e_1_2_13_55_1
  doi: 10.1002/2016JA023338
– ident: e_1_2_13_29_1
  doi: 10.1029/2000JA000212
– ident: e_1_2_13_50_1
  doi: 10.1002/2017JA024009
– ident: e_1_2_13_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.08.009
– ident: e_1_2_13_5_1
  doi: 10.1109/TNS.1983.4333158
– ident: e_1_2_13_33_1
  doi: 10.1002/9781118084328
– ident: e_1_2_13_54_1
  doi: 10.1109/23.819111
– ident: e_1_2_13_22_1
  doi: 10.1051/swsc/2021031
– start-page: 33
  volume-title: Workshop on the radiation environment of the satellite power system
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_13_51_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_18_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40623-020-01221-2
– ident: e_1_2_13_20_1
  doi: 10.1109/WiSEE50203.2021.9613828
– ident: e_1_2_13_15_1
  doi: 10.1109/TNS.2002.805380
– ident: e_1_2_13_24_1
  doi: 10.1002/2016JA023173
– ident: e_1_2_13_26_1
  doi: 10.1029/2005gl022373
– ident: e_1_2_13_30_1
  doi: 10.2514/6.2011-3739
– ident: e_1_2_13_25_1
  doi: 10.1029/97ja03995
– ident: e_1_2_13_48_1
  doi: 10.1029/2001JA000219
– ident: e_1_2_13_14_1
  doi: 10.1002/2015ja021568
– start-page: 36
  volume-title: International exchange and innovation conference on engineering & sciences (IEICES)
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_13_17_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_52_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40623-016-0525-y
– start-page: 58
  volume-title: Plasma physics via computer simulation
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_13_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_19_1
  doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1551
– volume-title: The calculation of proton penetration and dose rates (techreport No. NASA‐TM‐X‐53063)
  year: 1964
  ident: e_1_2_13_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_13_41_1
  doi: 10.1029/2010JA015247
– ident: e_1_2_13_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/2017SW001612
– ident: e_1_2_13_40_1
  doi: 10.1029/2009SW000482
– ident: e_1_2_13_49_1
  doi: 10.1029/2004JA010798
– volume-title: Orbital mechanics for engineering students
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_13_10_1
SSID ssj0024524
ssj0000866621
Score 2.3413353
Snippet During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner radiation...
Abstract During a few solar energetic particle (SEP) events, solar protons were trapped within the geomagnetic field and reached the outer edge of the inner...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
SubjectTerms Astronauts
DST Index
Earth orbits
Earth surface
Energetic particles
Fluctuations
Geomagnetic field
Geomagnetic storm effects
Geomagnetic storms
Geomagnetism
Inner radiation belt
Latitude
Low earth orbits
Magnetic field configurations
Magnetic fields
Magnetic storms
Mathematical models
Proton flux
Radiation
Radiation belts
Radiation dosage
Relativistic particles
Satellite observation
Satellite technology
Satellites
Single event upsets
Solar energetic particles
Solar energy
Solar magnetic field
Solar particle events
Solar proton flux
Solar protons
Solar storms
Storm effects
Storms
Trajectories
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1NTxsxELVKeumlKoWKUEA-FC5oheO1nd1jgE1R1ZZIAYXbyvbauZBdlAUJ_j0zXhPCoZW4rawZyZrxx5tZzxtCfhjvZap9laRKV4mQXCRaWJtIgEgDL-xQhYT-n7_q4lr8upE3MeGGtTAdP8Qq4YY7I5zXuMG1aSPZAHJkYt_v6Qz5VJTYIB-xuha587mYvHLtya6prRSAIiG4jw_fQf9kXfvNlRSY-9_AzXXQGm6d8RfyOcJFOur8u0k-uPor2Rm1mMBuFk_0iIbvLj_RbpHZT9cs9LzG0kQ6hXh6QTt-4pY2NQWwR38Xl3SybADy0fHtwyM9D3WKdIohLi2wEjDoTuKSogU-iGy3yfW4uDq7SGLvhMQKsG9ivTWAvarMKWZyCftSDblJcy0z7VNmUqYBijGX504r4dPcMIM8O0gfaOCGSr-RXt3UbofQITLOKztw1uQCImntZJYzayvLPGZ8--T4xXyljcTi2N_itgw_uHlerhu7Tw5X0ncdocY_5E7REysZpMEOA81yXkYTlBBfi8xz5gd6KLS1poJPfAijmc_gLO-TvRc_lnFvtiUS3HPQZBxmHnz734mU01nBB4qz3XdJfyefcLx7-bJHevfLB7cP-OXeHIRF-gz6ReTX
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Geomagnetic Storm Effects on the LEO Proton Flux During Solar Energetic Particle Events
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2023SW003664
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906233802
https://doaj.org/article/33848f20f1a74accbd0f1effea0f8153
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1BT9swFLYGu3BBgw1R1lU-sF1QNNdx3PhYIKWatlKtQ-UW2Y7NhSaItBL8-73npKgcgAs3K7KTp_fsvO89P38m5Nh4n8TaF1EsdRGJhItIC2ujBCBS3ws7kCGh_2cix1fi13VyvXHVF9aENfTAjeJ-QgglUs-Z7-uB0NaaAppY66CZT2G54t8XfN46mFqz7MFH2zJ3xhVG-PFsjtwrUjxzQIGn_xm43ISowceMPpHdFhzSYSPUHvngyn1yOKwxXV0tHukPGtpNNqL-TOYXrlromxIPItIZRM8L2rAR17QqKUA7-ju7pNP7CgAeHd2uHuh5OJVIZxjQ0gzP_YWx01YPNMPyx_oLuRpl_87GUXtTQmQFaDOy3hpAWkXqJDMqgVUoB9zESiep9jEzMdMAvJhTymkpfKwMM8iqg2SBBvxRfEC2y6p0h4QOkF9e2r6zRgmIm7VLUsWsLSzzmN_tkJO1-nLb0ojjbRa3edjO5irfVHaHfH_qfdfQZ7zQ7xQt8dQHSa_DA5gKeauC_K2p0CHdtR3zdiXWOdLZcxjJOEgebPuqIPlsnvG-5OzoPST6Snbw5U35S5dsL-9X7huAmKXpkS0upj3y8TSbTP_2wuz9D-Jn7qs
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9QwELWgHOCCKB_qQik-ABcU4XVsJzmWNssC27LSttreLNuxe-kmaNNK8O-ZcdxlewCJmxWNJWvGY7-ZeN4Q8taGIHMTmixXpsmE5CIzwrlMAkQaB-EKFRP6J6dqei6-XsiL1OcUa2EGfohNwg09I57X6OCYkE5sA0iSiY2_F0skVFHiPnkgFC_QM7mY_yHbk0NXWykARkJ0n16-w_yP27Pv3EmRuv8O3txGrfHamTwhjxNepIeDgXfJPd8-JXuHPWawu9Uv-p7G8ZCg6J-R5Wffrcxli7WJdAEB9YoOBMU97VoKaI_O6u90vu4A89HJ1c1PehwLFekCY1xaYylgnDtPe4rW-CKyf07OJ_XZ0TRLzRMyJ0DBmQvOAvhqSq-YrSQ4piq4zSsjSxNyZnNmAIsxX1XeKBHyyjKLRDvIH2jhispfkJ22a_0eoQVSzis39s5WAkJp42VZMecaxwKmfEfkw636tEvM4tjg4krHP9y80tvKHpF3G-kfA6PGX-Q-oSU2MsiDHT9060udVKAhwBZl4CyMTSGMc7aBIb6EMSyUcJiPyP6tHXVyzl4jwz2HmYzDyqNt_7kQvVjWfKw4e_lf0m_Iw-nZyUzPvpx-e0UeoczwDGaf7Fyvb_xrADPX9iBu2N9k9-hD
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3fT9swELZGJ028IPYDUdYNP2x7maK5ie0mjzDSsY2xSh0qb5bt2H2hCWpAGv89d44p5QEk3qzoTrLOPvu7y91nQj4Z70WmfZVkUlcJFylPNLc2EQCRhp7bkQwJ_T-n8viM_zoX5zHhhr0wHT_EKuGGnhHOa3Twy8pHsgHkyMR3v6cz5FORfIO8DP_7kNmZT-659kT3qK3ggCIhuI-F76D_bV37wZUUmPsfwM110BpunfE22YpwkR506_uavHD1G7J70GICu1nc0C80jLv8RPuWzH64ZqHnNbYm0inE0wva8RO3tKkpgD16Uv6lk2UDkI-OL67_06PQp0inGOLSEjsBg-4kbilaYkFk-46cjct_34-T-HZCYjnYN7HeGsBeVe4kM4UAv5Sj1GSFFrn2GTMZ0wDFmCsKpyX3WWGYQZ4dpA80cENlO6RXN7XbJXSEjPPSDp01BYdIWjuRF8zayjKPGd8--XpnPmUjsTi-b3Ghwg_utFDrxu6Tzyvpy45Q4xG5Q1yJlQzSYIcPzXKuogkUxNc89ynzQz3i2lpTwRALYTTzOZzlfTK4W0cVfbNVSHCfgiZLYeZhbZ-ciJrOynQoU7b3LOl98mpyNFYnP09_vyebKNIVwQxI72p57T4AlLkyH8N-vQUWl-d1
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geomagnetic+Storm+Effects+on+the+LEO+Proton+Flux+During+Solar+Energetic+Particle+Events&rft.jtitle=Space+weather&rft.au=Girgis%2C+Kirolosse+M.&rft.au=Hada%2C+Tohru&rft.au=Yoshikawa%2C+Akimasa&rft.au=Matsukiyo%2C+Shuichi&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029%2F2023SW003664&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1029_2023SW003664
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1542-7390&client=summon