Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage

Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimals (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 9; p. 1122
Main Authors Xiong, Yi, Xu, Jingjing, Guo, Linna, Chen, Fei, Jiang, Dedai, Lin, Yanli, Guo, Chunze, Li, Xiaomei, Chen, Yunrong, Ni, Kuikui, Yang, Fuyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 27.04.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1, LP; Lacticaseibacillus 0rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.
AbstractList Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1, LP; Lacticaseibacillus 0rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1, LP; Lacticaseibacillus 0rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.
Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1, LP; Lacticaseibacillus 0rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.
Simple SummaryForage oat is an important feed resource in the world. Few studies on the application of different bacterial additives in forage oat silage have been found, which limits the utilization and promotion of oat silage in animal husbandry. In this study, we compared the fermentation quality and in vitro gas production of oat silage treated with four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1,LP; Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP). The results show that compared to the CK group (without additives), the LR group had a higher dry matter content, while the LP group showed an improvement in fermentation quality. At the same time, the bacterial community in the LR group was also different from that in other groups. The treatments of PP and LC had no significant effects on fermentation quality, but the in vitro gas production was significantly reduced in the treated oat silage. These results could help us to optimize the utilization of forage oat silage in balanced ruminant diets.AbstractBacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum F1, LP; Lacticaseibacillus 0rhamnosus XJJ01, LR; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei XJJ02, LC; and Propionibacterium acidipropionici 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.
Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of different bacteria, especially the propionic acid bacteria, in forage oat ensiling is yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the regulation effects of different bacterial additives on the fermentation quality of forage oat silage. Four additives ( F1, LP; XJJ01, LR; XJJ02, LC; and 1.1161, PP; without additives, CK) were inoculated in forage oat silage, and the fermentation quality and organic compounds were determined after 60 days of ensiling. Notably, LR showed higher dry matter preservation compared to other additives and CK. In addition, LP and LR showed strong lactic acid synthesis capacity, resulting in lower pH compared to other additives and CK. The treatments of PP and LC increased the bacterial diversity in silage, while the bacterial community in the LR group was different from that in other groups. In addition, the PP- and LC-treated oat silage showed significantly lower total in vitro gas production and a lower methane content. These results suggest that LP is more favorable for producing high-quality oat silage than LR, LC, or PP. Both the PP- and LC- treated oat silage may reduce rumen greenhouse gas emissions.
Author Xiong, Yi
Chen, Fei
Yang, Fuyu
Guo, Chunze
Ni, Kuikui
Li, Xiaomei
Xu, Jingjing
Guo, Linna
Jiang, Dedai
Chen, Yunrong
Lin, Yanli
AuthorAffiliation 1 College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; xiongleslie@126.com (Y.X.); xucau@outlook.com (J.X.); linnam921@163.com (L.G.); 17683267025@189.cn (F.C.); sy20203243207@cau.edu.cn (D.J.); guocz19970404@163.com (C.G.); b20193040360@cau.edu.cn (X.L.); nikk@cau.edu.cn (K.N.)
3 Donghan Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station of Fuqing City, Fujian 350300, China; 15005959791@163.com
2 Beijing Sure Academy of Biosciences, Beijing 100193, China; lyl161@126.com
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Donghan Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station of Fuqing City, Fujian 350300, China; 15005959791@163.com
– name: 2 Beijing Sure Academy of Biosciences, Beijing 100193, China; lyl161@126.com
– name: 1 College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; xiongleslie@126.com (Y.X.); xucau@outlook.com (J.X.); linnam921@163.com (L.G.); 17683267025@189.cn (F.C.); sy20203243207@cau.edu.cn (D.J.); guocz19970404@163.com (C.G.); b20193040360@cau.edu.cn (X.L.); nikk@cau.edu.cn (K.N.)
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yi
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7133-1558
  surname: Xiong
  fullname: Xiong, Yi
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jingjing
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Jingjing
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Linna
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Linna
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Fei
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Fei
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Dedai
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Dedai
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yanli
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Yanli
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Chunze
  surname: Guo
  fullname: Guo, Chunze
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xiaomei
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xiaomei
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yunrong
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Yunrong
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Kuikui
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3620-0074
  surname: Ni
  fullname: Ni, Kuikui
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Fuyu
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Fuyu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_oiTuyxAWpLHicTJK9IJVlt6xUVBAfV2vi2FuvEntxnIr-Dv4wbrdF2wpfPJ555_FoZg6zPeedzrIXwN_m-ZS_I2dB8CmAEE-yA8GrciJKwL0dez87HoY1T6fCHBCeZfs5YomI4iD7M_-96XywbsXipWZzY7SKA_OGfbTJDtpF9oFU1MESO21bG-2VTnHHFjr0KUrRpsfXkTobr9-wz1YF31jq2Mz3_eiSk5Fr2dKxnzYGz85oYF-Cb0d1m5g-WvhAK80uKLJvtkvm8-ypoW7Qx3f3UfZjMf8--zQ5vzhbzk7PJ6qoME6MyrE0gGVTFYqQCtVWjWmats5FZQSHQvG8Ak5UA2hu2rISSEaALkWj8zI_ypZbbutpLTfB9hSupScrbx0-rCSFaFWnJUfCeqpqBFDFFFsCRFNgAqLSSrWJ9X7L2oxNr1uVOhOoewB9GHH2Uq78lZwC51AVCfD6DhD8r1EPUfZ2ULrryGk_DlKUZVFzAKyS9NUj6dqPwaVW3ahEKrLmeVK93K3oXyn3s08C2ArSxIYhaCOV3Y4zFWg7CVzerJjcWbGUc_Io5x77P_VfpIzSPw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_00705_23
crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_02228_23
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_024_03435_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_1751_7915_14184
crossref_primary_10_1111_1751_7915_70118
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14122275
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40538_024_00702_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11020513
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1076499
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation11020081
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14111953
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8120707
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40643_024_00806_z
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1108890
crossref_primary_10_3389_frfst_2022_1108043
crossref_primary_10_1360_TB_2024_0209
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1063333
Cites_doi 10.3168/jds.2017-13909
10.1186/s40104-021-00645-4
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114998
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114669
10.1006/jcrs.2000.0349
10.3389/fbioe.2021.612285
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84603-0
10.1051/animres:2000119
10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62060-X
10.1021/jf071775v
10.3389/fmicb.2021.750920
10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055
10.3390/agriculture11070672
10.3389/fmicb.2019.02998
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114370
10.1111/jam.15236
10.1017/S002185960003611X
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.03000.x
10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00197-8
10.1111/1462-2920.15428
10.3389/fmicb.2021.689174
10.1111/lam.12018
10.1002/jsfa.2740371005
10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122255
10.3168/jds.2019-16995
10.3390/microorganisms9020274
10.1007/s00253-016-7900-2
10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122336
10.1038/s41579-018-0041-0
10.1017/S1751731112000419
10.1111/grs.12285
10.3389/fmicb.2021.690801
10.1111/asj.13134
10.2527/jas.2013-6583
10.1186/s40104-019-0342-9
10.3168/jds.2017-13837
10.3389/fmicb.2021.701434
10.1071/AN16062
10.3389/fmicb.2020.586412
10.3168/jds.2021-20155
10.3390/fermentation7040286
10.1155/2010/945785
10.3168/jds.2017-13839
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2022 by the authors. 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2022 by the authors. 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3390/ani12091122
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
CrossRef
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 2076-2615
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_05a589c8511c495da155f457255ceccd
PMC9100174
35565552
10_3390_ani12091122
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Key Research & Development Program of China
  grantid: 2021YFD1300300
– fundername: Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China
  grantid: CARS-07-E-3
GroupedDBID 5VS
7XC
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
AFKRA
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
APEBS
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
EAD
EAP
EPL
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IAO
ITC
LK8
M48
MODMG
M~E
OK1
OZF
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PROAC
RPM
TUS
ZBA
NPM
ABUWG
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fc356f156b74ca5a4cd7bfbbd8327f2014c03710aa811e0fd6725af21e62be363
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2076-2615
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:24:37 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:06:09 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:06:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 11:17:39 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:46:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:55:52 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords Propionibacterium
fermentation quality
forage oat
lactic acid bacteria
greenhouse gas
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c475t-fc356f156b74ca5a4cd7bfbbd8327f2014c03710aa811e0fd6725af21e62be363
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ORCID 0000-0002-7133-1558
0000-0003-3620-0074
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3390/ani12091122
PMID 35565552
PQID 2662851803
PQPubID 2032438
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_05a589c8511c495da155f457255ceccd
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9100174
proquest_miscellaneous_2664801157
proquest_journals_2662851803
pubmed_primary_35565552
crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_ani12091122
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12091122
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20220427
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-27
PublicationDate_xml – month: 4
  year: 2022
  text: 20220427
  day: 27
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
– name: Basel
PublicationTitle Animals (Basel)
PublicationTitleAlternate Animals (Basel)
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher MDPI AG
MDPI
Publisher_xml – name: MDPI AG
– name: MDPI
References Lagier (ref_39) 2018; 16
Muck (ref_9) 2018; 101
ref_14
Wang (ref_22) 2019; 90
ref_19
ref_18
Ni (ref_16) 2017; 101
ref_15
Jia (ref_21) 2020; 67
Fant (ref_43) 2020; 103
Heron (ref_25) 1986; 37
Ni (ref_20) 2017; 238
Morgavi (ref_11) 2013; 7
Li (ref_40) 2011; 52
Monteiro (ref_10) 2021; 104
Sindou (ref_30) 2013; 182
Kung (ref_24) 2018; 101
Britt (ref_27) 1975; 58
Hristov (ref_13) 2013; 91
Nicholson (ref_1) 1957; 49
Li (ref_17) 2018; 17
Muraro (ref_38) 2021; 23
ref_36
ref_35
ref_34
Moss (ref_12) 2000; 49
ref_33
ref_32
ref_31
ref_37
Borreani (ref_7) 2018; 101
Salimei (ref_26) 2007; 55
Peterson (ref_48) 2001; 33
ref_47
ref_46
ref_45
ref_44
Chen (ref_29) 2021; 132
ref_41
ref_3
ref_2
Nagadi (ref_42) 2000; 87
ref_49
ref_8
ref_5
ref_4
Chen (ref_23) 2013; 56
ref_6
Flieg (ref_28) 1938; 1
References_xml – volume: 101
  start-page: 4020
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_24
  article-title: Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13909
– ident: ref_45
  doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00645-4
– ident: ref_37
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114998
– ident: ref_5
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114669
– volume: 33
  start-page: 115
  year: 2001
  ident: ref_48
  article-title: Oat Antioxidants
  publication-title: J. Cereal Sci.
  doi: 10.1006/jcrs.2000.0349
– ident: ref_18
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.612285
– volume: 58
  start-page: 532
  year: 1975
  ident: ref_27
  article-title: Fungal Growth and Acid Production During Fermentation and Refermentation of Organic Acid Treated Corn Silages1
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84603-0
– volume: 49
  start-page: 231
  year: 2000
  ident: ref_12
  article-title: Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming
  publication-title: Ann. De Zootech.
  doi: 10.1051/animres:2000119
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2768
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_17
  article-title: Influence of lactic acid bacteria, cellulase, cellulase-producing Bacillus pumilus and their combinations on alfalfa silage quality
  publication-title: J. Integr. Agric.
  doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62060-X
– volume: 55
  start-page: 9600
  year: 2007
  ident: ref_26
  article-title: Lactobacillus rhamnosus as additive for maize and sorghum ensiling
  publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem.
  doi: 10.1021/jf071775v
– ident: ref_8
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.750920
– volume: 238
  start-page: 706
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_20
  article-title: Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage
  publication-title: Bioresour. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055
– volume: 1
  start-page: 112
  year: 1938
  ident: ref_28
  article-title: A key for the evaluation of silage samples
  publication-title: Futterb. Giirfutterbereitung
– ident: ref_31
  doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070672
– ident: ref_15
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02998
– ident: ref_47
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114370
– volume: 132
  start-page: 189
  year: 2021
  ident: ref_29
  article-title: Effect of citric acid residue and short-chain fatty acids on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of lucerne ensiled with lactic acid bacteria inoculants
  publication-title: J. Appl. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1111/jam.15236
– volume: 49
  start-page: 129
  year: 1957
  ident: ref_1
  article-title: The effect of stage of maturity on the yield and chemical composition of oats for haymaking
  publication-title: J. Agric. Sci.
  doi: 10.1017/S002185960003611X
– volume: 52
  start-page: 314
  year: 2011
  ident: ref_40
  article-title: Bacterial and fungal communities of wilted Italian ryegrass silage inoculated with and without Lactobacillus rhamnosus or Lactobacillus buchneri
  publication-title: Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.03000.x
– volume: 87
  start-page: 231
  year: 2000
  ident: ref_42
  article-title: The influence of diet of the donor animal on the initial bacterial concentration of ruminal fluid and in vitro gas production degradability parameters
  publication-title: Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00197-8
– volume: 23
  start-page: 5979
  year: 2021
  ident: ref_38
  article-title: Bacterial dynamics of sugarcane silage in the tropics
  publication-title: Environ. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15428
– ident: ref_49
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.689174
– volume: 56
  start-page: 71
  year: 2013
  ident: ref_23
  article-title: Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolates and their inoculating effects on the silage fermentation at high temperature
  publication-title: Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1111/lam.12018
– volume: 37
  start-page: 979
  year: 1986
  ident: ref_25
  article-title: Changes in the nitrogenous components of gamma-irradiated and inoculated ensiled ryegrass
  publication-title: J. Sci. Food Agric.
  doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740371005
– ident: ref_32
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122255
– volume: 103
  start-page: 1404
  year: 2020
  ident: ref_43
  article-title: Effects of different barley and oat varieties on methane production, digestibility, and fermentation pattern in vitro
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16995
– ident: ref_44
– ident: ref_4
  doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020274
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1385
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_16
  article-title: Comparative microbiota assessment of wilted Italian ryegrass, whole crop corn, and wilted alfalfa silage using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing
  publication-title: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
  doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7900-2
– ident: ref_34
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122336
– volume: 16
  start-page: 540
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_39
  article-title: Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0041-0
– volume: 7
  start-page: 184
  year: 2013
  ident: ref_11
  article-title: Rumen microbial (meta)genomics and its application to ruminant production
  publication-title: Animal
  doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000419
– volume: 67
  start-page: 55
  year: 2020
  ident: ref_21
  article-title: The effects of stage of maturity and lactic acid bacteria inoculants on the ensiling characteristics, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop oat silages
  publication-title: Grassl. Sci.
  doi: 10.1111/grs.12285
– ident: ref_35
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.690801
– volume: 90
  start-page: 178
  year: 2019
  ident: ref_22
  article-title: Effect of microbial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics, nutritive value, and in vitro digestibility of various forages
  publication-title: Anim. Sci. J.
  doi: 10.1111/asj.13134
– volume: 91
  start-page: 5045
  year: 2013
  ident: ref_13
  article-title: Special Topics—Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci.
  doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6583
– ident: ref_14
  doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0342-9
– volume: 101
  start-page: 3952
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_7
  article-title: Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13837
– ident: ref_2
– ident: ref_33
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.701434
– ident: ref_41
  doi: 10.1071/AN16062
– ident: ref_36
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.586412
– volume: 104
  start-page: 8826
  year: 2021
  ident: ref_10
  article-title: Effects of lactic acid bacteria in a silage inoculant on ruminal nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and lactation performance of high-producing dairy cows
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20155
– ident: ref_19
– ident: ref_3
  doi: 10.3390/fermentation7040286
– ident: ref_46
  doi: 10.1155/2010/945785
– volume: 101
  start-page: 3980
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_9
  article-title: Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13839
– ident: ref_6
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371
– volume: 182
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: ref_30
  article-title: Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms
  publication-title: Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006
SSID ssj0000753151
Score 2.3201537
Snippet Bacterial inoculants are considered as a good choice for successful ensiling, playing a key role in improving the silage quality. However, the potential of...
Simple SummaryForage oat is an important feed resource in the world. Few studies on the application of different bacterial additives in forage oat silage have...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1122
SubjectTerms Acids
Additives
Bacteria
Carbon dioxide
Chromatography
COVID-19
Fermentation
fermentation quality
forage oat
greenhouse gas
Laboratories
lactic acid bacteria
Microorganisms
Polyethylene
Propionibacterium
Variance analysis
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJSQuiDeBggaJEyKqk9hxcmyBpSAVkKCo4hKNXxBUOVU3PfR38Ic7jrOrXVSJC7coHsuOPfZ8E3u-YeylwbYsLPJcW0UOSq2qvMXK5IKwfKu9587E2OGjT_Xhsfh4Ik82Un3FO2GJHjgN3B6XKJvWRGBgCMxbJAPohVQEhQ01b-PuSzZvw5n6nY7nKrJlKSCvIr9-D0Mfw0QJXpRbJmhi6r8OXv59S3LD7CzusNszXoT91M-77IYL99jNH8P0N_w--7O-QweE5CBxES9h8PB2znwywkEiZEbYt3a6KUTlARa0Jc9xRwESk8blazjqJ2ImanGOHBkvAYOFDwG-9-P5AO9xCV8SS2ysSA0tSIl-OviMI3ztT-nxATtevPv25jCf8yzkRig55t5UsvbkyGklDEoUxirttba02pUnhCBMJPbjiE1ROO5tTaOPvixcXWpX1dVDthOG4B4zcKpB23ijpCxFUxdYtj6mQuJaca-8ztir1dB3ZiYhj7kwTjtyRuI8dRvzlJEqrYTPEvfG9WIHcQ7XIpEwe3pBatTNatT9S40ytrvSgG5excuOwEtJNRpeZezFupjWXzxUweCGi0kmMvAUUmXsUVKYdU8Iy9WSRiJjakuVtrq6XRL6XxPHdxu5sZR48j--7Sm7VcagDS7yUu2ynfH8wj0jKDXq59OquQJTNR5R
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZgKyQuiDeBgozECRE1cew4OaEudClILRVQVHGJxq8SqXLKbnro7-APM068oYsqblHsyI494_nG9nxDyCsNNcsNZKkyEh2UUhZpDYVOOWL5WjmXWR1ihw8Oy_1j_ulEnMQNt1W8VrleE4eF2nQ67JHvoCFhiA6qrHh7_isNWaPC6WpMoXGTbOESXFUzsjXfOzz6Mu2yoEEs0KaNgXkF-vc74NsQLoowg22YooGx_zqY-e9tySvmZ3GX3Im4ke6OE32P3LD-Prn1oxt2xR-Q39NdOoqIjo6cxCvaOfo-ZkDp6XwkZga6a8xwYwjLPV3g0hzjjzwdGTUu39CDdiBowhZjBEl_ScEb-tHT722_7OgHWNGjkS02fIgNLVCYTi39DD392p7h40NyvNj79m4_jfkWUs2l6FOnC1E6dOiU5BoEcG2kckoZ1HrpEClwHQj-MoAqz23mTCmZAMdyWzJli7J4RGa-8_YJoVZWYCqnpRCMV2UOrHYhJVKmZOakUwl5vR76Rkcy8pAT46xBpyTMU3NlnhIUqXXl85GD4_pq8zCHU5VAnD286JanTdTDJhMgqloHnKnRNzSAeMpxgT8iNEqzScj2WgKaqM2r5q_sJeTlVIx6GA5XwNvuYqgTmHhyIRPyeBSYqSeI6UqBI5EQuSFKG13dLPHtz4Hruw4cWZI__X-3npHbLIRlZDxlcpvM-uWFfY5gqVcvokb8ARoVF3M
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565552
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2662851803
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2664801157
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9100174
https://doaj.org/article/05a589c8511c495da155f457255ceccd
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELaqVkhcEG8CZWUkTohAHnacHBDqQpeCtKUCFlVcIj_boJXT7qYS-zv4w4wdZ9WtVtyieKw49oz9je35BqGXkldZqngSC8XAQSlYHlc8lzEBLF8JYxItXezw9Lg4mpEvp_R0Bw3JOEMHLre6di6f1Gwxf_PncvUeDP6d8zjBZX_LbeMiQAE5wFy8B0sSc6kMpgHn_-5P63JY2vr4vJt1NlYkT9y_DW3evDR5bRWa3EV3AnzEB_1430M72t5Ht361fnP8Afq7vlKHAdjhnpp4iVuDP4ZEKB0e9_zMHB8o5S8OQbnFE5ihQxiSxT2xxuo1njaepwm-GAJJuhXmVuHPFv9sukWLP_ElPulJY11F-NAEdOpM46-8w9-bOTw-RLPJ4Y8PR3FIuxBLwmgXG5nTwoBfJxiRnHIiFRNGCAXGzwwABiIdz1_CeZmmOjGqYBnlJkt1kQmdF_kjtGtbq58grFnJVWkkozQjZZHyrDIuM1IiWGKYERF6NXR9LQMnuUuNMa_BN3HjVF8bpwg0axC-6Kk4touN3RiuRRx_tn_RLs7qYI51QjktK-ngpgQXUXGAVYZQ-BEqQalVhPYHDagHnawBy2RQo0zyCL1YF4M5ujMWbnV75WUcIU9KWYQe9wqzbglAu4JCT0SIbajSRlM3S2xz7im_K0eVxcjT_zfrGbqdueiMhMQZ20e73eJKPwfM1IkR2hsfHp98G_k9h5G3jn852xrD
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbKVgguiDeBAkaCCyKq49hxckCoS7vs0u5SQVtVXILjR4lUJWU3Fdrfwf_gNzLOiy6quPUWxU7iZGY83ziebxB6qWRCAy2Jn2kBAUokQj-RofIZYPkks5YY5XKHp7NofMg-HvPjNfS7y4Vx2yq7ObGeqHWp3Br5JjgSCuggJuG7sx--qxrl_q52JTQatdg1y58Qsi3eTrZBvq8oHe0cvB_7bVUBXzHBK9-qkEcWwpZMMCW5ZEqLzGaZBt0WFvwhU47GjkgZB4EhVkeCcmlpYCKamTAK4b7X0DoLI0IHaH24M9v_3K_qgAMOwYc2iYBhmJBNWeQuPRVgDV1xfXWFgMtg7b-7My-4u9FtdKvFqXirUaw7aM0Ud9H1r2W9Cn8P_er37mFAkLjhQF7g0uLttuJKhYcNEbTEW1rXO5SgvcAjcAVtvlOBGwaP5Rs8zWtCKHhim7FSLbEsNJ4U-Civ5iX-IBd4v2GndRfCg0agvCcGf5IV_pKfwuF9dHglkniABkVZmEcIGxFLHVslOKcsjgJJE-tKMJFMECts5qHX3adPVUt-7mpwnKYQBDk5pRfk5IEKd53PGs6Py7sNnQz7Lo6ouz5Rzk_S1u5TwiWPE-VwrYJYVEvAb5ZxeBGuwHq0hzY6DUjb2WOR_tV1D73om8Hu3c8cWZjyvO7jmH8CLjz0sFGYfiSAISMOX8JDYkWVVoa62lLk32tu8cRxcgn2-P_Deo5ujA-me-neZLb7BN2kLiWEMJ-KDTSo5ufmKQC1KnvWWgdG367aIP8AdrtUog
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVCAuiDeGAosEF4QVe-312geEGlLTUBoioFXFxaz3USxVdklcofwO_g2_jlk_QoMqbr1F2U289szOfLOe-QbguRQJ9ZXw3FxxDFAiHriJCKQbIpZPcmM8LW3t8P402j0I3x-xow343dfC2LTK3iY2hlpV0p6RD9GRUEQHsRcMTZcWMRunb05_uLaDlH3T2rfTaFVkTy9_Yvi2eD0Zo6xfUJrufHm763YdBlwZcla7RgYsMhjC5DyUgolQKp6bPFeo59ygbwylpbTzhIh9X3tGRZwyYaivI5rrIArwf6_AJrdR0QA2RzvT2afVCQ864wD9aVsUGASJNxRlYUtVEeLQNTfYdAu4COL-m6l5zvWlN-FGh1nJdqtkt2BDl7fh6teqOZG_A79WeXwE0SRp-ZAXpDJk3HVfqcmoJYUWZFupJlsJx0uSolvoap9K0rJ5LF-R_aIhh8IrdtUr9ZKIUpFJSQ6Lel6Rd2JBZi1Trf0hXihFRT7W5KOoyefiBD_ehYNLkcQ9GJRVqR8A0TwWKjaSM0bDOPIFTYxtx-Tl3DPc5A687B99JjsidNuP4yTDgMjKKTsnJwfVuZ982vJ_XDxtZGW4mmJJu5svqvlx1tmAzGOCxYm0GFdiXKoEYjkTMrwRJnEnKQe2eg3IOkuyyP7qvQPPVsNoA-yLHVHq6qyZY1mAfMYduN8qzGoliCcjhk_CAb6mSmtLXR8pi-8Nz3hi-bl4-PD_y3oK13AjZh8m071HcJ3a6hAvdCnfgkE9P9OPEbPV-ZNucxD4dtn78Q8egFjX
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring+the+Effects+of+Different+Bacteria+Additives+on+Fermentation+Quality%2C+Microbial+Community+and+In+Vitro+Gas+Production+of+Forage+Oat+Silage&rft.jtitle=Animals+%28Basel%29&rft.au=Xiong%2C+Yi&rft.au=Xu%2C+Jingjing&rft.au=Guo%2C+Linna&rft.au=Chen%2C+Fei&rft.date=2022-04-27&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.eissn=2076-2615&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1122&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fani12091122&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2076-2615&client=summon