The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 16, influence of remuneration model on choice of intraocular lens in the UK

Background/Objectives Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) “block contract” (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEye (London) Vol. 37; no. 18; pp. 3854 - 3860
Main Authors Ting, Darren S. J., Tatham, Andrew J., Donachie, Paul H. J., Buchan, John C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.12.2023
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0950-222X
1476-5454
1476-5454
DOI10.1038/s41433-023-02665-y

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background/Objectives Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) “block contract” (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) “payment by results” (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used. Subjects/Methods Cataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service. Results We included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic ( n  = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs ( n  = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.
AbstractList Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) "block contract" (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) "payment by results" (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used. Cataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service. We included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic (n = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs (n = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs (p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.
Background/Objectives Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) “block contract” (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) “payment by results” (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used. Subjects/Methods Cataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service. Results We included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic ( n  = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs ( n  = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.
Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) "block contract" (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) "payment by results" (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used.BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVESCataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) "block contract" (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) "payment by results" (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used.Cataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service.SUBJECTS/METHODSCataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service.We included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic (n = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs (n = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs (p < 0.001).RESULTSWe included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic (n = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs (n = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs (p < 0.001).This study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.
Background/ObjectivesCataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract surgery is remunerated by two models: (1) “block contract” (BC), which commissions organisations to deliver whole service pathways without considering specific activity items; or (2) “payment by results” (PbR), which pays a tariff price for each procedure. This study aimed to examine the association between remuneration model and the cost and types of IOL used.Subjects/MethodsCataract operations recorded on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database were included, with additional data collected for remuneration model from NHS England and cost of IOL from the NHS Spend Comparison Service.ResultsWe included 907,052 cataract operations from 87 centres. The majority of operations were performed in PbR centres (456 198, 50.3%), followed by BC centres (240 641, 26.5%) and mixed models centres (210 213, 23.2%). The mean price of hydrophobic (n = 7) and hydrophilic IOLs (n = 5) were £45.72 and £42.86, respectively. Hydrophobic IOLs were predominantly used (650 633, 71.7%) and were significantly more commonly used in centres remunerated by BC (96.5% vs. 3.5%) than those by PbR (65.7% vs. 34.3%) when compared to hydrophilic IOLs (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the IOL choice may be perversely incentivised by the IOL cost and remuneration model. Although hydrophobic IOLs are more expensive at the point of surgery, their potential longer-term cost-effectiveness due to reduced requirement for YAG capsulotomy should be considered.
Author Buchan, John C.
Donachie, Paul H. J.
Tatham, Andrew J.
Ting, Darren S. J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Darren S. J.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1081-1141
  surname: Ting
  fullname: Ting, Darren S. J.
  organization: Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Academic Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew J.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0372-3100
  surname: Tatham
  fullname: Tatham, Andrew J.
  organization: Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paul H. J.
  surname: Donachie
  fullname: Donachie, Paul H. J.
  organization: Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Audit
– sequence: 4
  givenname: John C.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1005-7011
  surname: Buchan
  fullname: Buchan, John C.
  email: john.buchan@lshtm.ac.uk
  organization: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Audit, International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Ustu1DAUtVARnRZ-gAWyxIYFAT9iJ2GD0PAUFZXQILGzPI4zceXYg-0gZcdv8CN8EF-CM2mhdNGFZeueh4_uvSfgyHmnAXiI0TOMaP08lriktEBkPpyzYroDVriseMFKVh6BFWoYKgghX4_BSYwXCGWwQvfAMa0YpyWpVuDXptfws5-khWtvrd5p6Dt4vu9TL-3grd-ZmOLvHz_hJ5mMd5l3HZzga5nkVkYNYxrbaRarXAlSJRjHsNNhegGD3vuQIOZPoXGdHbVTh2-CHkanw8EYDr7VFuaH6r1ZcONSkF6NVgZotYu5AFPO--XjfXC3kzbqB5f3Kdi8fbNZvy_Ozt99WL86K1RZsVRotCUUs6atGa9U1RHa1ZQq2dZNidGWb1VX4YYT0pVEt1ihSvJWIoSaUnU1o6fg5WK7H7eDbpWeA1mxD2aQYRJeGvE_4kwvdv67wIg3NWI4Ozy5dAj-26hjEoOJSlsrnfZjFKRmiCLOGM3UxzeoF34MueMzq6kxpxRXmfXoeqS_Wa5Gmgn1QlDBxxh0J5RJhxbnhMbmaGLeHrFsj8jbIw7bI6YsJTekV-63iugiipns8sD_xb5F9QeV1NxT
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02684_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_16766
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjo_2024_02_014
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_024_03344_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40942_024_00562_4
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.021
10.1080/09286580490888762
10.1186/s12886-017-0546-8
10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.002
10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283414284
10.1136/bmj.328.7446.969
10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.07.012
10.3389/fbioe.2022.913383
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.004
10.1038/s41433-019-0630-9
10.3389/fdata.2023.1017420
10.1097/MD.0000000000008301
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.024
10.1038/eye.2012.300
10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01839-6
10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008
10.1038/s41433-018-0131-2
10.1371/journal.pone.0277093
10.4103/tjo.tjo_19_17
10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.001
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.028
10.1038/s41433-022-02204-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
– notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1038/s41433-023-02665-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Central Student
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1476-5454
EndPage 3860
ExternalDocumentID PMC10698051
37563427
10_1038_s41433_023_02665_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations England
United Kingdom--UK
GeographicLocations_xml – name: England
– name: United Kingdom--UK
GroupedDBID ---
-Q-
.GJ
0R~
29G
2WC
36B
39C
3O-
4.4
406
53G
5RE
6PF
70F
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AACDK
AANZL
AASML
AATNV
AAWTL
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABAWZ
ABBRH
ABCQX
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABRTQ
ABUWG
ABZZP
ACAOD
ACGFS
ACKTT
ACPRK
ACRQY
ACSTC
ACZOJ
ADBBV
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEVLU
AEXYK
AEZWR
AFBBN
AFDZB
AFFNX
AFHIU
AFKRA
AFSHS
AGAYW
AGHAI
AGQEE
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHWEU
AIGIU
AILAN
AIXLP
AJRNO
ALFFA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYLF
AOIJS
ATHPR
AXYYD
AYFIA
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKKNO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
E3Z
EBLON
EBS
EBX
EE.
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FDQFY
FERAY
FIGPU
FIZPM
FSGXE
FYUFA
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
IWAJR
JSO
JZLTJ
KQ8
L7B
M1P
M7P
NQJWS
O9-
OK1
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
RNS
RNT
RNTTT
ROL
RPM
SNX
SNYQT
SOHCF
SOJ
SRMVM
SV3
SWTZT
TAOOD
TBHMF
TDRGL
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
ZGI
ZXP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FE
8FH
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
LK8
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PUEGO
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-e0b23159d8567c7f23f833cad89410b6bcf719622f42ed1c07a6da00094cf853
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0950-222X
1476-5454
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:36:06 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 19:05:07 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:25:40 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:07:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:00:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:24 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:08:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 18
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c475t-e0b23159d8567c7f23f833cad89410b6bcf719622f42ed1c07a6da00094cf853
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0372-3100
0000-0003-1005-7011
0000-0003-1081-1141
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/10698051
PMID 37563427
PQID 2898163317
PQPubID 33647
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10698051
proquest_miscellaneous_2850306553
proquest_journals_2898163317
pubmed_primary_37563427
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_s41433_023_02665_y
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02665_y
springer_journals_10_1038_s41433_023_02665_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationSubtitle The Scientific Journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists
PublicationTitle Eye (London)
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eye
PublicationTitleAlternate Eye (Lond)
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
Nature Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing Group UK
– name: Nature Publishing Group
References Ting, Rees, Ng, Allen, Steel (CR9) 2017; 43
Luo, Wang, Chen, Xu, Yin, Yao (CR11) 2022; 10
Nanavaty, Zukaite, Salvage (CR17) 2019; 45
Ursell, Dhariwal, O'Boyle, Khan, Venerus (CR19) 2020; 34
Grzybowski, Zemaitiene, Markeviciute, Tuuminen (CR22) 2022; 237
Ting, Deshmukh, Ting, Ang (CR2) 2023; 6
Lamoureux, Fenwick, Pesudovs, Tan (CR4) 2011; 22
Berdahl, Bala, Dhariwal, Rathi, Gupta (CR15) 2022; 17
CR12
Nanavaty, Spalton, Boyce, Brain, Marshall (CR16) 2008; 34
Srinivasan, Ting, Lyall (CR6) 2013; 27
Erie (CR7) 2014; 121
Ursell, Dhariwal, Majirska, Ender, Kalson-Ray, Venerus (CR18) 2018; 32
Salerno, Tiveron, Alió (CR8) 2017; 7
Chen, Xu, Chen, Yao (CR3) 2021; 1
Zhao, Yang, Li, Huang, Zhu (CR13) 2017; 96
Giers, Tandogan, Auffarth, Choi, Auerbach, Sel (CR20) 2017; 17
Ng, Ting, Thomas, Auffarth, Merz (CR21) 2021; 56
Cicinelli, Buchan, Nicholson, Varadaraj, Khanna (CR1) 2023; 401
Day, Burr, Bennett, Bunce, Doré, Rubin (CR10) 2020; 127
Muralikrishnan, Venkatesh, Prajna, Frick (CR5) 2004; 11
Dixon (CR14) 2004; 328
BC Giers (2665_CR20) 2017; 17
PG Ursell (2665_CR18) 2018; 32
MV Cicinelli (2665_CR1) 2023; 401
AC Day (2665_CR10) 2020; 127
JY Ng (2665_CR21) 2021; 56
R Muralikrishnan (2665_CR5) 2004; 11
J Dixon (2665_CR14) 2004; 328
LC Salerno (2665_CR8) 2017; 7
DSJ Ting (2665_CR9) 2017; 43
Y Zhao (2665_CR13) 2017; 96
S Srinivasan (2665_CR6) 2013; 27
MA Nanavaty (2665_CR17) 2019; 45
C Luo (2665_CR11) 2022; 10
J Berdahl (2665_CR15) 2022; 17
2665_CR12
A Grzybowski (2665_CR22) 2022; 237
PG Ursell (2665_CR19) 2020; 34
JC Erie (2665_CR7) 2014; 121
MA Nanavaty (2665_CR16) 2008; 34
DSJ Ting (2665_CR2) 2023; 6
X Chen (2665_CR3) 2021; 1
EL Lamoureux (2665_CR4) 2011; 22
37542172 - Eye (Lond). 2023 Dec;37(18):3712-3713. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02684-9
References_xml – volume: 237
  start-page: 139
  year: 2022
  end-page: 45
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Should we abandon hydrophilic intraocular lenses?
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.021
– volume: 11
  start-page: 369
  year: 2004
  end-page: 80
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Economic cost of cataract surgery procedures in an established eye care centre in Southern India
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1080/09286580490888762
– volume: 17
  year: 2017
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty - a material analysis with special reference to optical quality assessment
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0546-8
– volume: 121
  start-page: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 4
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Rising cataract surgery rates: demand and supply
  publication-title: Ophthalmology.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.002
– volume: 22
  start-page: 19
  year: 2011
  end-page: 27
  ident: CR4
  article-title: The impact of cataract surgery on quality of life
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283414284
– volume: 328
  start-page: 969
  year: 2004
  end-page: 70
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Payment by results-new financial flows in the NHS
  publication-title: BMJ.
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.969
– volume: 56
  start-page: e9
  year: 2021
  end-page: e11
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens following vitreoretinal surgery: a clinicopathological report
  publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.07.012
– volume: 10
  start-page: 913383
  year: 2022
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Recent advances of intraocular lens materials and surface modification in cataract surgery
  publication-title: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913383
– ident: CR12
– volume: 45
  start-page: 847
  year: 2019
  end-page: 53
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Edge profile of commercially available square-edged intraocular lenses: Part 2
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.004
– volume: 34
  start-page: 960
  year: 2020
  end-page: 8
  ident: CR19
  article-title: 5 year incidence of YAG capsulotomy and PCO after cataract surgery with single-piece monofocal intraocular lenses: a real-world evidence study of 20,763 eyes
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0630-9
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1017420
  year: 2023
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Big data in corneal diseases and cataract: current applications and future directions
  publication-title: Front Big Data
  doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1017420
– volume: 96
  start-page: e8301
  year: 2017
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens in preventing posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: an updated meta-analysis
  publication-title: Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008301
– volume: 34
  start-page: 677
  year: 2008
  end-page: 86
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Edge profile of commercially available square-edged intraocular lenses
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.024
– volume: 27
  start-page: 531
  year: 2013
  end-page: 7
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Implantation of a customized toric intraocular lens for correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.300
– volume: 401
  start-page: 377
  year: 2023
  end-page: 89
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Cataracts
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01839-6
– volume: 1
  start-page: 100008
  year: 2021
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Cataract: advances in surgery and whether surgery remains the only treatment in future
  publication-title: Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1579
  year: 2018
  end-page: 89
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Three-year incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy and posterior capsule opacification and its relationship to monofocal acrylic IOL biomaterial: a UK Real World Evidence study
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0131-2
– volume: 17
  start-page: e0277093
  year: 2022
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Cost-benefit analysis of a trifocal intraocular lens versus a monofocal intraocular lens from the patient’s perspective in the United States
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277093
– volume: 7
  start-page: 179
  year: 2017
  end-page: 84
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Multifocal intraocular lenses: types, outcomes, complications and how to solve them
  publication-title: Taiwan J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_19_17
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1135
  year: 2017
  end-page: 9
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Effect of high-vacuum setting on phacoemulsification efficiency
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.001
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1012
  year: 2020
  end-page: 9
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomized noninferiority trial
  publication-title: Ophthalmology.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.028
– volume: 10
  start-page: 913383
  year: 2022
  ident: 2665_CR11
  publication-title: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913383
– volume: 56
  start-page: e9
  year: 2021
  ident: 2665_CR21
  publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.07.012
– volume: 34
  start-page: 960
  year: 2020
  ident: 2665_CR19
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0630-9
– volume: 96
  start-page: e8301
  year: 2017
  ident: 2665_CR13
  publication-title: Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008301
– volume: 34
  start-page: 677
  year: 2008
  ident: 2665_CR16
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.024
– volume: 237
  start-page: 139
  year: 2022
  ident: 2665_CR22
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.021
– volume: 121
  start-page: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 2665_CR7
  publication-title: Ophthalmology.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.002
– volume: 27
  start-page: 531
  year: 2013
  ident: 2665_CR6
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.300
– volume: 1
  start-page: 100008
  year: 2021
  ident: 2665_CR3
  publication-title: Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1579
  year: 2018
  ident: 2665_CR18
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0131-2
– volume: 17
  year: 2017
  ident: 2665_CR20
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0546-8
– volume: 401
  start-page: 377
  year: 2023
  ident: 2665_CR1
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01839-6
– volume: 17
  start-page: e0277093
  year: 2022
  ident: 2665_CR15
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277093
– volume: 45
  start-page: 847
  year: 2019
  ident: 2665_CR17
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.004
– volume: 7
  start-page: 179
  year: 2017
  ident: 2665_CR8
  publication-title: Taiwan J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_19_17
– ident: 2665_CR12
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02204-1
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1135
  year: 2017
  ident: 2665_CR9
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.001
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1012
  year: 2020
  ident: 2665_CR10
  publication-title: Ophthalmology.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.028
– volume: 328
  start-page: 969
  year: 2004
  ident: 2665_CR14
  publication-title: BMJ.
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.969
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1017420
  year: 2023
  ident: 2665_CR2
  publication-title: Front Big Data
  doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1017420
– volume: 22
  start-page: 19
  year: 2011
  ident: 2665_CR4
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283414284
– volume: 11
  start-page: 369
  year: 2004
  ident: 2665_CR5
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1080/09286580490888762
– reference: 37542172 - Eye (Lond). 2023 Dec;37(18):3712-3713. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02684-9
SSID ssj0014770
Score 2.4103827
Snippet Background/Objectives Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK,...
Cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK, publicly funded cataract...
Background/ObjectivesCataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Within the UK,...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 3854
SubjectTerms 692/699/3161/3168
692/700/228
692/700/3934
Cataract
Cataract Extraction
Cataracts
England
Eye surgery
Humans
Hydrophobicity
Intraocular lenses
Laboratory Medicine
Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods
Lenses, Intraocular
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmologists
Ophthalmology
Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology
Postoperative Complications
Remuneration
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Title The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 16, influence of remuneration model on choice of intraocular lens in the UK
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41433-023-02665-y
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563427
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2898163317
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2850306553
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10698051
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NbtQwELboVkJcEP8ESmUkbjRq4tixwwXx06oCURBqpb1Fju1oV9omS7N72BuvwYvwQDwJM46TaqnoIVIU20msGc98nhnPEPJKcGNdpavYcmVjzgsbK1PUsWEsrVyVo-sKoy1O85Nz_mkqpsHg1oWwykEmekFtW4M28kPYGCjADqDu3i5_xFg1Cr2roYTGDtkFEazEhOy-Pzr99n30I3Dpy8UBjkhi0ITTcGwmydRhxwEqoA8TrzwX8WZbNV3Dm9fDJv_xnXqVdHyP3A1Ykr7riX-f3HLNA3L7S_CWPyS_gQeotw_QYB-gbU2_LmermV5ctP3hn-7Pz180ZMdebDVu6Ee90qjmqE9Ci4PR2oPnqmjXH6d-Q3unA03zAzofCp5gz0t3scaM1vhi6uvtULgBYTvv2-c4u9ZHwVLQfB08oABG6fnnR-Ts-Ojsw0kc6jTEhkuxil1SAUoUhVUil0bWLKtVlhltVcHTpMorU0tY6IzVnDmbmkTq3Gof1GhqgAuPyaRpG_eUUKadMpVlrrYZt4WqQL5IWQuWWM1skkckHShUmpDDHEtpLErvS89U2VO1BKqWnqrlJiKvxzHLPoPHjb33BsKXYTV35RXvReTl2AzrEJ0runHtGvsI3H4JkUXkSc8n4-cyKfKMMxittjho7IA5vrdbmvnM5_qGHXuhQHBG5GBgtqv_-v80nt08jefkDkPG92E5e2Syuly7FwCuVtU-2ZFTuR_W0V_c-icI
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtMwGLamTQJuEOcVBhgJrli0xLEdBwkhYJs6uhWEOql3UWI7aqWuKUsq1Dteg4fglgfiSfh_5zCVid3tolJU22mt__TZ_4mQl4JrY7M08wxXxuM8Np7Sce5pxoLMZhJdVxhtMZT9U_5pLMYb5FebC4Nhla1OdIraFBrvyPfgYKAAO4C5e7f45mHXKPSuti00arYY2NV3OLKVb4_2gb6vGDs8GH3se01XAU_zSFSe9TPANCI2SshIRzkLcxWGOjUq5oGfyUznEbAlYzln1gTaj1JpUheCp3OFTSJA428ByohBiLY-HAy_fO3cFjxy3ekAtvgeGN5xk6Xjh2qv5IBM0GWKHymFt1q3hJfg7eUozX9ctc4CHt4htxvoSt_XvHaXbNj5PXLjpHHO3ye_geWou46gzXUELXL6eTGpJunsrKhzjco_P37Sphj3bG1wRffTKkWrSl3NW1yMl0uYxkXLOnv7Da19HDSQu3Ta9lfBmef2bIkFtPHF1LX3ofAAun1aj09xd4ULuqVgaEv4ggL2paeDB2R0HQR8SDbnxdxuE8pSq3RmmM1NyE2sMlBnUZQL5puUGV_2SNBSKNFNyXTs3DFLnOs-VElN1QSomjiqJqseed2tWdQFQ66cvdMSPmmUR5lcsHqPvOiGQezRl5PObbHEOQJPe0KEPfKo5pPu58JIyJAzWK3WOKibgCXF10fm04krLR74Mlagp3tkt2W2i__1_208vnobz8nN_ujkODk-Gg6ekFsMhcBFBO2Qzep8aZ8CrquyZ400UZJcs_z-Bf0sYaw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELemTpp4QYy_gQFGgicWNXFsx0FCCOiqjUKZ0Cb1LUpsR63UNWVpNfWNr8EXQeLr8Em4c5JOZWJve4gUxXYS6853Z__uDyEvBdfG5lnuG66Mz3lifKWTwteMhbnNJUJX6G0xlIen_NNIjLbI7zYWBt0qW5noBLUpNZ6Rd2FjoMB2AHXXLRq3iONe_938u48VpBBpbctp1CwysKsL2L5Vb496QOtXjPUPTj4e-k2FAV_zWCx8G-Rg34jEKCFjHRcsKlQU6cyohIdBLnNdxMCijBWcWRPqIM6kyZw7ni4UFowA6b8dg1JUHbL94WB4_G0NYfDYVaoDEybwQQmPmoidIFLdioOVgvApXlIKf7WpFa-Yulc9Nv-BbZ027N8htxszlr6v-W6XbNnZXbLzpQHq75FfwH7UHU3Q5miClgX9Oh8vxtn0rKzjjqo_P37SJjH3dKNxRXvZIkMNS13-WxyMB00Y0kWrOpL7Da3xDhrKfTppa61gz3N7tsRk2vhi6kr9ULgBOT-p2yc4u9I54FJQuhU8oGAH09PBfXJyEwR8QDqzcmYfEcoyq3RumC1MxE2ichBtcVwIFpiMmUB6JGwplOomfTpW8ZimDsaPVFpTNQWqpo6q6cojr9dj5nXykGt777WETxtBUqWXbO-RF-tmEAGI62QzWy6xj8CdnxCRRx7WfLL-XBQLGXEGo9UGB607YHrxzZbZZOzSjIeBTBTIbI_st8x2-V__n8bj66fxnOzAuk0_Hw0HT8gthmvAOQftkc7ifGmfgom3yJ81i4mS9IaX719LeWXY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Royal+College+of+Ophthalmologists%E2%80%99+National+Ophthalmology+Database+study+of+cataract+surgery%3A+report+16%2C+influence+of+remuneration+model+on+choice+of+intraocular+lens+in+the+UK&rft.jtitle=Eye+%28London%29&rft.au=Ting%2C+Darren+S.+J.&rft.au=Tatham%2C+Andrew+J.&rft.au=Donachie%2C+Paul+H.+J.&rft.au=Buchan%2C+John+C.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3854&rft.epage=3860&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fs41433-023-02665-y&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1038_s41433_023_02665_y
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0950-222X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0950-222X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0950-222X&client=summon