The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated molars restored with CAD/CAM resin composite overlay restorations

• Published in: Journal of dentistry Vol. 43; no. 9; pp. 1106 - 1115
• Main Authors: Rocca, G.T, Saratti, C.M, Cattani-Lorente, M, Feilzer, A.J, Scherrer, S, Krejci, I
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2015; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Accumulation; Adhesives; CAD/CAM; Composite Resins; Computer aided design; Crack propagation; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods; Dentistry; Endocrown; Endodontically treated teeth; Failure; Fiber composites; Fiber reinforced composite; Fibers; Fractography; Fracture mechanics; Humans; Light; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Molar - injuries; Molar - physiopathology; Molar - ultrastructure; Polymers; Polymethyl methacrylate; Random Allocation; Resins; Resins, Synthetic; Restoration; Studies; Teeth; Tooth Fractures - pathology; Tooth Fractures - physiopathology; Tooth, Nonvital - pathology; Tooth, Nonvital - physiopathology; Weight-Bearing; Endodontically treated teeth; Fractography; CAD/CAM; Endocrown; Fiber reinforced composite
• ISSN: 0300-5712; 1879-176X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.012

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the fracture strength and the mode of failure of endodontically treated molars restored with CAD/CAM overlays with fiber reinforced composite build-up of the pulp chamber. Methods 40 Devitalized molars were cut over the CEJ and divided into five groups ( n = 8). The pulp chamber area was filled with: group 0 (control), no resin build-up; group 1, hybrid composite build-up (G-aenial posterior, GC); group 2, as in group 1 but covered with 3 nets of bi-directional E-glass fibers (EverStickNET, Stick Tech Ltd.); group 3, a FRC resin (EverX posterior, GC); group 4, as in group 3 but covered by the bi-directional fibers. The crowns were restored with CAD–CAM composite restorations (Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE). Maximum fracture loads were recorded in Newton and data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test ( p < 0.05). Fragments were analyzed using SEM. Results The mean static loads in Newton were: group 0: 2448 (546); group 1: 2817 (873); group 2: 2128 (952); group 3: 2429 (1091); group 4: 2577 (833). No significant differences were found between the groups ( p > 0.05). All specimens fractured in a catastrophic way, under the CEJ. The main crack evolved in the corono-apical direction. In groups 2 and 4 secondary fracture paths with apico-coronal direction were detected close to the bi-directional fibers’ layer. Conclusions For the restoration of endodontically treated molars, the incorporation of FRCs did not influence the load-bearing capacity of the tooth–restoration complex. The SEM analysis showed a low ability of the bi-directional fibers net in deviating the fracture but this effect was not sufficient to lead more favorable fracture patterns, over the CEJ. Clinical significance The use of FRCs to reinforce the “core” of devitalized molars against vertical fractures under static loads seems useless when the thickness of the CAD/CAM composite overlay restoration is high.