Physician Adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guidelines
Abstract Background In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialti...
Saved in:
Published in | Women's health issues Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. e313 - e319 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract Background In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. Findings The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 ( p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography ( p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Conclusions Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. Findings The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 ( p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography ( p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Conclusions Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. Background: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. Findings: The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p less than or equal to .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Conclusions: Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. BACKGROUNDIn 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown.METHODSWe conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties.FINDINGSThe response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic.CONCLUSIONSPrimary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. Background: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties. Findings: The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p <= .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic. Conclusions: Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers. [Copyright Jacobs Institute of Women's Health; published by Elsevier Science Inc.] |
Author | Bonnema, Rachel, MD, MS Karpov, Irina, MS Rubio, Doris, PhD Corbelli, Jennifer, MD, MS McNeil, Melissa, MD, MPH Kraemer, Kevin, MD, MS Borrero, Sonya, MD, MS McNamara, Megan, MD, MS |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Corbelli, Jennifer, MD, MS – sequence: 2 fullname: Borrero, Sonya, MD, MS – sequence: 3 fullname: Bonnema, Rachel, MD, MS – sequence: 4 fullname: McNamara, Megan, MD, MS – sequence: 5 fullname: Kraemer, Kevin, MD, MS – sequence: 6 fullname: Rubio, Doris, PhD – sequence: 7 fullname: Karpov, Irina, MS – sequence: 8 fullname: McNeil, Melissa, MD, MPH |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24794545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkktv1DAUhS1URB_wA9igLNkkXL9iR0hIVdUWpCKKpl1brn3DeJrHYCeD5t_jaAoLFqgre_GdI8vfOSVHwzggIW8pVBRo_WFT_VqHigEVFfAKgL8gJ1QrXQrO6FG-g2hKrmt1TE5T2gCAZBJekWMmVCOkkCfk--16n4ILdijO_RojDg6LaSzuq1VV3Ebc4TCFHRYrjLvgMBV3Nj0WV2PM2Ffb9-OPaLfrfXE9B49dGDC9Ji9b2yV883Sekfury7uLz-XNt-svF-c3pRNKTCXWKL2WHtFbmx9mRYvKWlFryTwwp9oHJazTiK2jdU295S00CNQhlazl_Iy8P_Ru4_hzxjSZPiSHXWcHHOdkqBS0UVoL_RwUGGeMqWegjPLM6Saj9IC6OKYUsTXbGHob94aCWfyYjcl-zOLHADfZT868e6qfH3r0fxN_hGTg4wHA_HW7gNEkFxYpPkR0k_Fj-G_9p3_SLjsJznaPuMe0Gec4ZCeGmsQMmNUykGUfVORtcKn5b8BLtlU |
CODEN | WHISEH |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_016_3990_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4330_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_COC_0000000000000272 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0281153 crossref_primary_10_1177_2333392819862122 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18730 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2019_03_023 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2018_7463 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13187_019_01544_z crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2016_6076 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2017_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2017_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2016_01_016 crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_0009_12181 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_015_3449_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_03630242_2015_1088115 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2017_10_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2021_101446 crossref_primary_10_1080_08952841_2018_1549433 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2021_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2014_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_015_3490_4 crossref_primary_10_1177_0898264318802047 crossref_primary_10_1200_CCI_17_00090 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2018_7436 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_018_4601_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_018_4740_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_016_3973_y crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1990_2728 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2015_10_010 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2017_6775 |
Cites_doi | 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.012 10.1186/1472-6874-12-36 10.1016/S1388-9842(03)00003-5 10.1002/cncr.28105 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00708-5 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11601-1 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318169ce3e 10.1001/jama.287.22.2951 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.041 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002 10.1002/cncr.27698 10.3322/caac.20063 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390100028008 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012 10.1207/S15430154JCE1802_11 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30280.x 10.1186/1472-6963-12-32 10.1186/1471-2458-3-9 10.2105/AJPH.93.4.635 10.1023/A:1018790104934 10.1542/peds.2006-3457 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.005 10.1136/bmj.g366 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120093010 10.1136/jamia.1996.97084513 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Jacobs Institute of Women's Health 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Jacobs Institute of Women's Health – notice: 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health – notice: Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 7U1 7U2 C1K 7QJ |
DOI | 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Risk Abstracts Safety Science and Risk Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Risk Abstracts Safety Science and Risk Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
DatabaseTitleList | Risk Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
EISSN | 1878-4321 |
EndPage | e319 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_whi_2014_03_003 24794545 S1049386714000358 1_s2_0_S1049386714000358 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Division of General Internal Medicine at UPMC – fundername: Thomas H. Nimick Jr. Competitive Research Fund |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 0R 1 1- 1B1 1P 1RT 1~. 1~5 29R 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P 9JM 9JO AACTN AAEDT AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALMO AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFLS ABFRF ABIVO ABLVK ABMAC ABMMH ABMZM ABPIF ABPTK ABQIS ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACJTP ACRLP ADALY ADBBV ADEZE AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AEVXI AFCTW AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXBA AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AISVY AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV DU5 EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FO G- G-2 G-Q GBLVA GJ HEC HMK HMO HVGLF HZ IHE IPNFZ J1W K K-O KOM L7B LCYCR M M29 M2W M2X M41 MO0 MVM N9A NAHTW O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OQ. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SNG SNH SPCBC SSB SSH SSO SSZ T5K UHS UNMZH WUQ XPP YCJ YHZ YYQ Z5R ZKG --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1P~ 8P~ AAEDW ABJNI ADMUD AXJTR EFLBG FYGXN HZ~ PH~ ~G- AKRWK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAXKI AAYXX CITATION 7X8 7U1 7U2 C1K 7QJ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e6e5d85deedaa005a4fe7aa46852d02c7fb74ac8eefc1661da3f09e01ce152f33 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1049-3867 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 10:29:57 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 27 04:56:04 EDT 2024 Thu Aug 15 23:33:19 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 18:01:19 EDT 2024 Thu May 23 23:20:11 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:16:53 EST 2024 Thu Aug 18 17:13:07 EDT 2022 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-e6e5d85deedaa005a4fe7aa46852d02c7fb74ac8eefc1661da3f09e01ce152f33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 24794545 |
PQID | 1521327389 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1541978848 proquest_miscellaneous_1540232227 proquest_miscellaneous_1521327389 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2014_03_003 pubmed_primary_24794545 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_whi_2014_03_003 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1049386714000358 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2014 text: 2014-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Women's health issues |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Womens Health Issues |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Kaplan, Haas, Perez-Stable, Des Jarlais, Gregorich (bib25) 2005; 41 Goodman, E. (2009, November 25). A backlash of mistrust. Washington Post. Squiers, Holden, Dolina, Kim, Bann, Renaud (bib40) 2011; 40 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (N.D.-b) Covered preventive services for women including pregnant women. Available from Friedman, Plon, Cooper, Weinberg (bib13) 1997; 12 Vennochi, J. (2009, November 19). Taking a hit on health care? Why that's women's work. Boston Globe. Nelson, Tyne, Naik, Bougatsos, Chan, Humphrey (bib32) 2009; 151 Shea, DuMouchel, Bahamonde (bib37) 1996; 3 Medicare.gov. (N.D.). Your Medicare coverage. Available from Yarnall, Pollak, Ostbye, Krause, Michener (bib48) 2003; 93 Beckman, Markakis, Suchman, Frankel (bib3) 1994; 154 Smith, Cokkinides, Brooks, Saslow, Brawley (bib38) 2010; 60 Yasmeen, Romano, Tancredi, Saito, Rainwater, Kravitz (bib49) 2012; 12 Allen, Solberg Nes, Marnach, Polga, Jenkins, Files (bib1) 2012; 12 Critics See Health Care Rationing Behind New Mammography Recommendations. (2009). Available Habtes, Friedman, Raskind-Hood, Adams, Becker, D'Orsi (bib19) 2013; 119 Howard, Adams (bib23) 2012; 55 Collins, G. (2009, November 19). The breast bruhaha. New York Times. Davidson, Liao, Magee (bib9) 2011; 205 Nelson, Zakher, Cantor, Fu, Griffin, O'Meara (bib33) 2012; 156 . Bender, Bartlett, Rand, Turner, Wamboldt, Zhang (bib4) 2007; 120 Herman, Hoffman, Altobelli (bib21) 1999; 24 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2010). Preventive Services Covered Under the Affordable Care Act. Available from Haas, Kaplan, Gregorich, Perez-Stable, Des Jarlais (bib18) 2004; 19 Dugdale, Epstein, Pantilat (bib10) 1999; 14 Special Report' Panel on Senate Health Care Bill: New Mammogram Guidelines. (2009). Available Humphrey, Helfand, Chan, Woolf (bib24) 2002; 137 Tunis, Hayward, Wilson, Rubin, Bass, Johnston, Steinberg (bib41) 1994; 120 (bib2) 2011; 118 Accessed December 20, 2013. Friedman, Cooper, Webb, Weinberg, Plon (bib12) 2003; 18 Accessed January 22, 2013. Miller, Wall, Baines, Sun, To, Narod (bib29) 2014; 348 Santora, Mahoney, Lawvere, Englert, Symons, Mirand (bib35) 2003; 3 Grady, D. (2009, November 3). Second opinion — quandary with mammograms: Get a screening, or just skip it? New York Times. Harris, Taylor, Thielke, Payne, Gonzalez, Conde (bib20) 2009; 42 Shapiro, Simpson, Lawrence, Talsky, Sobocinski, Schiedermayer (bib36) 1989; 149 Grimshaw, Russell (bib17) 1993; 342 Brener, McManus, Galuska, Lowry, Wechsler (bib5) 2003; 32 Lewis, Halm, Marcus, Korenstein, Federman (bib26) 2008; 111 Elmore, Barton, Moceri, Polk, Arena, Fletcher (bib11) 1998; 338 U.S. Census Bureau. (N.D.-a) State & county quick facts. Available from Garg, Adhikari, McDonald, Rosas-Arellano, Devereaux, Beyene (bib14) 2005; 293 Mouchawar, Klein, Mullineaux (bib30) 2001; 16 Cleland, Cohen-Solal, Aguilar, Dietz, Eastaugh, Follath (bib6) 2002; 360 van Ravesteyn, Miglioretti, Stout, Lee, Schechter, Buist (bib46) 2012; 156 USPSTF mammography recommendations will result in countless unnecessary breast cancer deaths each year. (2009). Available (bib31) 2010 Hickson, Federspiel, Pichert, Miller, Gauld-Jaeger, Bost (bib22) 2002; 287 McKee, Leslie, LeMaitre, Webb, Denvir (bib27) 2003; 5 Pace, He, Keating (bib34) 2013; 119 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib28 Howard (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib23) 2012; 55 Nelson (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib33) 2012; 156 Santora (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib35) 2003; 3 Haas (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib18) 2004; 19 Cleland (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib6) 2002; 360 Smith (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib38) 2010; 60 (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib2) 2011; 118 Elmore (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib11) 1998; 338 van Ravesteyn (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib46) 2012; 156 Harris (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib20) 2009; 42 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib16 Herman (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib21) 1999; 24 Grimshaw (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib17) 1993; 342 Kaplan (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib25) 2005; 41 Beckman (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib3) 1994; 154 Brener (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib5) 2003; 32 Mouchawar (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib30) 2001; 16 Tunis (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib41) 1994; 120 Bender (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib4) 2007; 120 Garg (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib14) 2005; 293 Yarnall (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib48) 2003; 93 Lewis (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib26) 2008; 111 Pace (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib34) 2013; 119 Yasmeen (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib49) 2012; 12 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib7 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib8 Friedman (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib12) 2003; 18 Humphrey (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib24) 2002; 137 Squiers (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib40) 2011; 40 Miller (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib29) 2014; 348 Nelson (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib32) 2009; 151 Shea (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib37) 1996; 3 Shapiro (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib36) 1989; 149 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib15 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib39 Friedman (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib13) 1997; 12 (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib31) 2010 Dugdale (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib10) 1999; 14 Allen (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib1) 2012; 12 Hickson (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib22) 2002; 287 Davidson (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib9) 2011; 205 Habtes (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib19) 2013; 119 McKee (10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib27) 2003; 5 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib42 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib44 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib43 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib45 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib47 |
References_xml | – volume: 12 start-page: 199 year: 1997 end-page: 203 ident: bib13 article-title: Cancer genetics–survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education contributor: fullname: Weinberg – volume: 14 start-page: S34 year: 1999 end-page: S40 ident: bib10 article-title: Time and the patient-physician relationship publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Pantilat – volume: 120 start-page: e471 year: 2007 end-page: e477 ident: bib4 article-title: Impact of interview mode on accuracy of child and parent report of adherence with asthma-controller medication publication-title: Pediatrics contributor: fullname: Zhang – volume: 3 start-page: 9 year: 2003 ident: bib35 article-title: Breast cancer screening beliefs by practice location publication-title: BMC Public Health contributor: fullname: Mirand – volume: 3 start-page: 399 year: 1996 end-page: 409 ident: bib37 article-title: A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting publication-title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association contributor: fullname: Bahamonde – volume: 12 start-page: 36 year: 2012 ident: bib1 article-title: Patient understanding of the revised USPSTF screening mammogram guidelines: need for development of patient decision aids publication-title: BMC Womens Health contributor: fullname: Files – volume: 338 start-page: 1089 year: 1998 end-page: 1096 ident: bib11 article-title: Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine contributor: fullname: Fletcher – volume: 32 start-page: 281 year: 2003 end-page: 287 ident: bib5 article-title: Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students publication-title: Journal of Adolescent Health contributor: fullname: Wechsler – volume: 111 start-page: 945 year: 2008 end-page: 952 ident: bib26 article-title: Preventive services use among women seen by gynecologists, general medical physicians, or both publication-title: Obstetrics and Gynecology contributor: fullname: Federman – volume: 120 start-page: 956 year: 1994 end-page: 963 ident: bib41 article-title: Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Steinberg – volume: 41 start-page: 7 year: 2005 end-page: 15 ident: bib25 article-title: Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians publication-title: Preventive Medicine contributor: fullname: Gregorich – volume: 42 start-page: 377 year: 2009 end-page: 381 ident: bib20 article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: Journal of Biomedical Informatics contributor: fullname: Conde – volume: 93 start-page: 635 year: 2003 end-page: 641 ident: bib48 article-title: Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? publication-title: American Journal of Public Health contributor: fullname: Michener – volume: 360 start-page: 1631 year: 2002 end-page: 1639 ident: bib6 article-title: Management of heart failure in primary care (the IMPROVEMENT of Heart Failure Programme): An international survey publication-title: Lancet contributor: fullname: Follath – volume: 342 start-page: 1317 year: 1993 end-page: 1322 ident: bib17 article-title: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations publication-title: Lancet contributor: fullname: Russell – volume: 18 start-page: 91 year: 2003 end-page: 94 ident: bib12 article-title: Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: A comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education contributor: fullname: Plon – volume: 293 start-page: 1223 year: 2005 end-page: 1238 ident: bib14 article-title: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Beyene – volume: 287 start-page: 2951 year: 2002 end-page: 2957 ident: bib22 article-title: Patient complaints and malpractice risk publication-title: JAMA contributor: fullname: Bost – volume: 5 start-page: 549 year: 2003 end-page: 555 ident: bib27 article-title: Management of chronic heart failure due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction by cardiologist and non-cardiologist physicians publication-title: European Journal of Heart Failure contributor: fullname: Denvir – volume: 156 start-page: 635 year: 2012 end-page: 648 ident: bib33 article-title: Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: O'Meara – volume: 154 start-page: 1365 year: 1994 end-page: 1370 ident: bib3 article-title: The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions publication-title: Archives of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Frankel – volume: 118 start-page: 372 year: 2011 end-page: 382 ident: bib2 article-title: Practice bulletin no. 122: Breast cancer screening publication-title: Obstetrics and Gynecology – volume: 119 start-page: 481 year: 2013 end-page: 487 ident: bib19 article-title: Determining the impact of US mammography screening guidelines on patient survival in a predominantly African American population treated in a public hospital during 2008 publication-title: Cancer contributor: fullname: D'Orsi – volume: 205 start-page: 30.e31 year: 2011 end-page: 30.e37 ident: bib9 article-title: Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure publication-title: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology contributor: fullname: Magee – volume: 156 start-page: 609 year: 2012 end-page: 617 ident: bib46 article-title: Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: A comparative modeling study of risk publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Buist – volume: 55 start-page: 485 year: 2012 end-page: 487 ident: bib23 article-title: Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation publication-title: Preventive Medicine contributor: fullname: Adams – volume: 149 start-page: 2190 year: 1989 end-page: 2196 ident: bib36 article-title: A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients publication-title: Archives of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Schiedermayer – volume: 119 start-page: 2518 year: 2013 end-page: 2523 ident: bib34 article-title: Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations publication-title: Cancer contributor: fullname: Keating – volume: 16 start-page: 33 year: 2001 end-page: 37 ident: bib30 article-title: Colorado family physicians' knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education contributor: fullname: Mullineaux – volume: 348 start-page: g366 year: 2014 ident: bib29 article-title: Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomised screening trial publication-title: BMJ contributor: fullname: Narod – volume: 151 start-page: 727 year: 2009 end-page: 737 ident: bib32 article-title: Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Humphrey – volume: 19 start-page: 302 year: 2004 end-page: 309 ident: bib18 article-title: Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient's risk? publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Des Jarlais – volume: 137 start-page: 347 year: 2002 end-page: 360 ident: bib24 article-title: Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine contributor: fullname: Woolf – year: 2010 ident: bib31 publication-title: National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practice for Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening – volume: 40 start-page: 497 year: 2011 end-page: 504 ident: bib40 article-title: The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening publication-title: American Journal of Preventive Medicine contributor: fullname: Renaud – volume: 60 start-page: 99 year: 2010 end-page: 119 ident: bib38 article-title: Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening publication-title: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians contributor: fullname: Brawley – volume: 12 start-page: 32 year: 2012 ident: bib49 article-title: Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: A web-based survey of primary care physicians publication-title: BMC Health Services Research contributor: fullname: Kravitz – volume: 24 start-page: 253 year: 1999 end-page: 267 ident: bib21 article-title: Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico publication-title: Journal of Community Health contributor: fullname: Altobelli – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib44 – volume: 120 start-page: 956 issue: 11 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib41 article-title: Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008 contributor: fullname: Tunis – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib15 – volume: 55 start-page: 485 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib23 article-title: Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation publication-title: Preventive Medicine doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.012 contributor: fullname: Howard – volume: 12 start-page: 36 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib1 article-title: Patient understanding of the revised USPSTF screening mammogram guidelines: need for development of patient decision aids publication-title: BMC Womens Health doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-36 contributor: fullname: Allen – volume: 5 start-page: 549 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib27 article-title: Management of chronic heart failure due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction by cardiologist and non-cardiologist physicians publication-title: European Journal of Heart Failure doi: 10.1016/S1388-9842(03)00003-5 contributor: fullname: McKee – volume: 119 start-page: 2518 issue: 14 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib34 article-title: Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.28105 contributor: fullname: Pace – volume: 32 start-page: 281 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib5 article-title: Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students publication-title: Journal of Adolescent Health doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00708-5 contributor: fullname: Brener – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib28 – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib7 – volume: 40 start-page: 497 issue: 5 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib40 article-title: The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening publication-title: American Journal of Preventive Medicine doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027 contributor: fullname: Squiers – volume: 14 start-page: S34 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib10 article-title: Time and the patient-physician relationship publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x contributor: fullname: Dugdale – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib45 – volume: 360 start-page: 1631 issue: 9346 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib6 article-title: Management of heart failure in primary care (the IMPROVEMENT of Heart Failure Programme): An international survey publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11601-1 contributor: fullname: Cleland – volume: 111 start-page: 945 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib26 article-title: Preventive services use among women seen by gynecologists, general medical physicians, or both publication-title: Obstetrics and Gynecology doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318169ce3e contributor: fullname: Lewis – volume: 287 start-page: 2951 issue: 22 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib22 article-title: Patient complaints and malpractice risk publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.287.22.2951 contributor: fullname: Hickson – volume: 41 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib25 article-title: Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians publication-title: Preventive Medicine doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.041 contributor: fullname: Kaplan – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib31 – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib8 – volume: 156 start-page: 609 issue: 9 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib46 article-title: Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: A comparative modeling study of risk publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002 contributor: fullname: van Ravesteyn – volume: 12 start-page: 199 issue: 4 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib13 article-title: Cancer genetics–survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education contributor: fullname: Friedman – volume: 119 start-page: 481 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib19 article-title: Determining the impact of US mammography screening guidelines on patient survival in a predominantly African American population treated in a public hospital during 2008 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.27698 contributor: fullname: Habtes – volume: 60 start-page: 99 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib38 article-title: Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening publication-title: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians doi: 10.3322/caac.20063 contributor: fullname: Smith – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib39 – volume: 151 start-page: 727 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib32 article-title: Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009 contributor: fullname: Nelson – volume: 156 start-page: 635 issue: 9 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib33 article-title: Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006 contributor: fullname: Nelson – volume: 149 start-page: 2190 issue: 10 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib36 article-title: A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients publication-title: Archives of Internal Medicine doi: 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390100028008 contributor: fullname: Shapiro – volume: 342 start-page: 1317 issue: 8883 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib17 article-title: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N contributor: fullname: Grimshaw – volume: 42 start-page: 377 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib20 article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: Journal of Biomedical Informatics doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 contributor: fullname: Harris – volume: 16 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib30 article-title: Colorado family physicians' knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education contributor: fullname: Mouchawar – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib42 – volume: 338 start-page: 1089 issue: 16 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib11 article-title: Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 contributor: fullname: Elmore – volume: 137 start-page: 347 issue: 5 Part 1 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib24 article-title: Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012 contributor: fullname: Humphrey – volume: 18 start-page: 91 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib12 article-title: Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: A comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results publication-title: Journal of Cancer Education doi: 10.1207/S15430154JCE1802_11 contributor: fullname: Friedman – volume: 19 start-page: 302 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib18 article-title: Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient's risk? publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30280.x contributor: fullname: Haas – volume: 12 start-page: 32 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib49 article-title: Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: A web-based survey of primary care physicians publication-title: BMC Health Services Research doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-32 contributor: fullname: Yasmeen – volume: 3 start-page: 9 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib35 article-title: Breast cancer screening beliefs by practice location publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-9 contributor: fullname: Santora – volume: 93 start-page: 635 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib48 article-title: Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? publication-title: American Journal of Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.4.635 contributor: fullname: Yarnall – volume: 24 start-page: 253 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib21 article-title: Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico publication-title: Journal of Community Health doi: 10.1023/A:1018790104934 contributor: fullname: Herman – volume: 118 start-page: 372 issue: 2 Pt 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib2 article-title: Practice bulletin no. 122: Breast cancer screening publication-title: Obstetrics and Gynecology – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib43 – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib16 – volume: 120 start-page: e471 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib4 article-title: Impact of interview mode on accuracy of child and parent report of adherence with asthma-controller medication publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3457 contributor: fullname: Bender – volume: 205 start-page: 30.e31 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib9 article-title: Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure publication-title: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.005 contributor: fullname: Davidson – volume: 348 start-page: g366 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib29 article-title: Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomised screening trial publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366 contributor: fullname: Miller – ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib47 – volume: 154 start-page: 1365 issue: 12 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib3 article-title: The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions publication-title: Archives of Internal Medicine doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120093010 contributor: fullname: Beckman – volume: 3 start-page: 399 issue: 6 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib37 article-title: A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting publication-title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.97084513 contributor: fullname: Shea – volume: 293 start-page: 1223 issue: 10 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003_bib14 article-title: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 contributor: fullname: Garg |
SSID | ssj0005250 |
Score | 2.2565088 |
Snippet | Abstract Background In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct... In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with... BACKGROUNDIn 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict... Background: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | e313 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Cross-Sectional Studies Doctors Early Detection of Cancer Female Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Health Surveys Humans Logistic Models Male Mammography Mammography - standards Mass Screening - standards Middle Aged Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data Preventive health care Primary Health Care - organization & administration Screening Task forces United States |
Title | Physician Adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guidelines |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1049386714000358 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24794545 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1521327389 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1540232227 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1541978848 |
Volume | 24 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEB5EQQQR39ZHieBJ2HbbZDfdYynW-qj4KngL2WxCq9CKbfXmb3ey2RRF7MHTskuWhMlkvklm5gvASWx4GpkkC1SUmoApXHOJMVFAZShTxEel8nvIujdxp8cun6KnBWj5WhibVlnYfmfTc2tdfKkW0qy-DgbVB9xIJNTSs7E8HmYLfhmCEep05fN7mkdUMBIkgW3tI5t5jtdHf2Czu5jjOaV_YdNfvmeOQe11WCucR9J049uABT3chOVuER7fhFV3CEdcbdEW3N36cwvSzPqusI9MRqRXeagQT970rok3GORRjl9Ie_SGzboSNdTRWZPzqSXDsgny29Brnz22OkFxh0KgGGeTQMc6yhpRhlAoJUpDMqO5lCxuRPUsrCtuUs6kamhtVA2xOpPUhIkOa0ojshtKd2BxOBrqPSDoixmTGpxYQ1ks7Z0dkiYpOixcJYrLEpx66YlXR5UhfA7Zs0BRCytqEVLLR1oC7uUrfA0oWi09LpbQWNTEuC5C8WuaS8Bmf_7QFIEgMK_DYz-LAleQDYvIoR5NsSNUGmorlJJ5bXCfbYNSfG6bGu7JGwyHuOvUZCaHuiXyR2d1_3-DP4AV--YSLQ9hcfI21UfoDE3Scq7tZVhqtu6vb-3z4qpz8wVTiwmg |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,4521,24144,27957,27958,45620,45714 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS8MwED_8ABVE_HZ-RvBJ6NYtadM-ijjnx0RxA99CmiY4hU3cpm_-7V6aRhRxD762KQmXy90vvbvfARzFhmeRSfNARZkJmMIzlxoTBVSGMkP_qFTRh6x9E7e67PIhepiCU18LY9MqS9vvbHphrcsntVKatZder3aPF4mUWno2VsTDkmmYtXDe9m-ofnzP84hKSoI0sMN9aLNI8np_7Nn0LuaITulfzukv8Fk4oeYyLJXokZy4Ba7AlO6vwly7jI-vwqL7C0dccdEa3N36HxfkJH90lX1kNCDd6n2VePamN028xSAdOXwmzcErDmtLVFHHZ03Ox5YNy2bIr0O3edY5bQVlE4VAMc5GgY51lCdRjr5QSpSGZEZzKVmcRI08bChuMs6kSrQ2qo7OOpfUhKkO60qjazeUbsBMf9DXW0AQjBmTGdxZQ1ksbdMOSdMMEQtXqeKyAsdeeuLFcWUIn0T2JFDUwopahNQSklaAe_kKXwSKZksPyzM0FHUxbIhQ_NrnCrCvL3-oikAvMGnCQ7-LAo-QjYvIvh6McSKEMNSWKKWTxuBF20al-MQxdbyUJwyXuOnU5EsODcvkj2h1-3-LP4D5Vqd9La4vbq52YMG-cVmXuzAzeh3rPURGo2y_0PxPCksJnQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician+Adherence+to+U.S.+Preventive+Services+Task+Force+Mammography+Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Women%27s+health+issues&rft.au=Corbelli%2C+Jennifer&rft.au=Borrero%2C+Sonya&rft.au=Bonnema%2C+Rachel&rft.au=McNamara%2C+Megan&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.issn=1049-3867&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e313&rft.epage=e319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.whi.2014.03.003&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_whi_2014_03_003 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10493867%2FS1049386713X0009X%2Fcov150h.gif |