Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey

In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 10...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 5514 - 5523
Main Authors Frija, Guy, Damilakis, John, Paulo, Graciano, Loose, Reinhard, Vano, Eliseo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.08.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients. Patient summary Radiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists’ measures and radiology departments’ strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015–2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0–2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue. Key Points • A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease. • There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0–2.72%) and optimisation should be improved. • Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.
AbstractList In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients. Radiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists' measures and radiology departments' strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015-2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0-2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue. KEY POINTS: • A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease. • There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0-2.72%) and optimisation should be improved. • Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients. Radiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists' measures and radiology departments' strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015-2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0-2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue. KEY POINTS: • A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease. • There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0-2.72%) and optimisation should be improved. • Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.
In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients. Patient summary Radiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists’ measures and radiology departments’ strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015–2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0–2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue. Key Points • A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease. • There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0–2.72%) and optimisation should be improved. • Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.
In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients.Patient summaryRadiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists’ measures and radiology departments’ strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015–2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0–2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue.Key Points• A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease.• There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0–2.72%) and optimisation should be improved.• Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.
In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern internationally. Evidence, predominantly from the USA, has shown that a significant number of patients receive a cumulative effective dose of 100 mSv or greater. To obtain a European perspective, EuroSafe Imaging carried out a survey to collect European data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent computed tomography examinations. The survey found that a relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose equal to or higher than 100 mSv from computed tomography, most of them having an oncological disease. However, there is considerable variation between institutions as these values ranged from 0 to 2.72%, highlighting that local practice or, depending on the institution and its medical focus, local patient conditions are likely to be a significant factor in the levels of cumulative effective dose received, rather than this simply being a global phenomenon. This paper also provides some practical actions to support the management of cumulative effective dose and to refine or improve practice where recurrent examinations are required. These actions are focused around increasing awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, actions focused on optimisation where a team approach is critical, better use of modern equipment and the use of Dose Management and Clinical Decision Support Systems together with focused clinical audits. The proper use of cumulative effective dose should be part of training programmes for referrers and practitioners, including what information to give to patients. Radiation is used to the benefit of patients in diagnostic procedures such as CT examinations, and in therapeutic procedures like the external radiation treatment for cancer. However, radiation is also known to increase the risk of cancer. To oversee this risk, the cumulative effective dose (CED) received by a patient from imaging procedures over his or her life is important. In this paper, the authors, on behalf of EuroSafe Imaging, report on a survey carried out in Europe that aims to estimate the proportion of patients that undergo CT examinations and are exposed to a CED of more than 100 mSv. At the same time, the survey enquires about and underlines radiologists' measures and radiology departments' strategies to limit such exposure. Over the period of 2015-2018, respondents reported that 0.5% (0-2.72%) of patients were exposed to a CED of ≥ 100 mSv from imaging procedures. The background radiation dose in Europe depends on the location, but it is around 2.5 mSv per year. It is obvious that patients with cancer, chronic diseases and trauma run the highest risk of having a high CED. However, even if the number of patients exposed to ≥ 100 mSv is relatively low, it is important to lower this number even further. Measures could consist in using procedures that do not necessitate radiation, using very low dose procedures, being very critical in requiring imaging procedures and increasing awareness about the issue. KEY POINTS: • A relatively low percentage of patients (0.5%) received a cumulative effective dose from CT computed tomography equal to or greater than 100 mSv, in Europe, most of them having an oncological disease. • There is a wide range in the number of patients who receive cumulative effective dose equal to or greater than 100 mSv (0-2.72%) and optimisation should be improved. • Increasing the awareness of referring physicians through encouraging local dialogue, concrete actions focused on optimisation and development of dose management systems is suggested.
Author Paulo, Graciano
Loose, Reinhard
Frija, Guy
Damilakis, John
Vano, Eliseo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Guy
  surname: Frija
  fullname: Frija, Guy
  email: guyfrija@gmail.com
  organization: Université de Paris
– sequence: 2
  givenname: John
  surname: Damilakis
  fullname: Damilakis, John
  organization: School of Medicine, University of Crete
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Graciano
  surname: Paulo
  fullname: Paulo, Graciano
  organization: ESTESC-Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Department, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Reinhard
  surname: Loose
  fullname: Loose, Reinhard
  organization: Institute of Medical Physics, Hospital Nuremberg
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Eliseo
  surname: Vano
  fullname: Vano, Eliseo
  organization: Radiology Department, Complutense University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks9u1DAQxi1URLeFF-CALHHhEhjb2TjhgIRWBSpVQqLlbDnOOLhK7MWOV_QVeGrMbsufHnoaW_P7Rt9ovhNy5INHQp4zeM0A5JsEIARUwFkFsumaij0iK1YLXjFo6yOygk60ley6-picpHQNAB2r5RNyLIRkICSsyM9NnvOkF7dDitai2b-GkJDaGGYa0eQY0S90c0Xxh56dL3DwiTpPz3IMW3xLt6WEpCdqQ6Rmct6Z8hmzG7Q3SHudcKDBU10kl1_2skttkZ7PenR-pCnHHd48JY-tnhI-u62n5OuHs6vNp-ri88fzzfuLytSyXqoaGy54b2VvmMFWM94PXdMKW4NuUDK-1gxta62BXoPuuJUts6UDwA1YLU7Ju8Pcbe5nHExZLupJbaObdbxRQTv1f8e7b2oMO9VyCbITZcCr2wExfM-YFjW7ZHCatMeQk-JrKC7qddMV9OU99Drk6Mt6haq7VkjZQqFe_Ovoj5W7MxWgPQAmhpQiWmXcsr9DMegmxUD9ToQ6JEKVRKh9IhQrUn5Pejf9QZE4iFKB_Yjxr-0HVL8AIrvK2w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2024_10_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_023_05638_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_022_08557_1
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20219004
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_acf6ca
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2022_110653
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000001111
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_11161_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_024_01765_x
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210478
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10076_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000001151
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2022_110452
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10659_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2024_111440
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines12030600
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25137064
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_abffc5
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20230106
crossref_primary_10_1667_RADE_21_00203_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2022_100470
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmrs_811
crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2022_11461
crossref_primary_10_1051_radiopro_2021011
crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_70022
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_ad8ce6
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6498_acdd7e
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13010020
crossref_primary_10_3390_life12121983
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10161_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10520_7
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210444
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210543
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_798460
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10299_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_11240_2
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ad3886
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_021_01041_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2025_01_018
crossref_primary_10_1051_radiopro_2022015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2023_111460
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2024_111340
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.007
10.1007/s11547-014-0485-x
10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.10.025
10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.12.005
10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/E1
10.2214/AJR.19.21511
10.1007/s00330-019-06551-8
10.1093/ndt/gfs145
10.1016/j.jacr.2012.03.003
10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013
10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7
10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y
10.1088/1361-6498/ab7fbb
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.079
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-11078
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2021
The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2021. The Author(s).
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2021
– notice: The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2021. The Author(s).
CorporateAuthor European Society of Radiology (ESR)
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: European Society of Radiology (ESR)
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7QO
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1007/s00330-021-07696-1
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Journals
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database ProQuest
Biological Science Database (Proquest)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest Central Student
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-1084
EndPage 5523
ExternalDocumentID PMC8270793
33710370
10_1007_s00330_021_07696_1
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Europe
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Europe
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACREN
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADOJX
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBNVY
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
C6C
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LK8
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
M7P
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UDS
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7U
Z7X
Z7Y
Z7Z
Z82
Z83
Z85
Z87
Z88
Z8M
Z8O
Z8R
Z8S
Z8T
Z8V
Z8W
Z8Z
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
ADHKG
ADKFA
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
NPM
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
ABRTQ
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
K9.
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4e6232bf7bc1ce8a12bd9683f40a6e7125a1ef8ffc0ba0a92f781f6e7002c0fa3
IEDL.DBID C6C
ISSN 0938-7994
1432-1084
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:31:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:29:04 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:09:03 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:28:23 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:08:22 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:48:25 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Clinical audit
Radiation exposure
Surveys and questionnaires
X-ray computed tomography
Clinical decision support systems
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-4e6232bf7bc1ce8a12bd9683f40a6e7125a1ef8ffc0ba0a92f781f6e7002c0fa3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07696-1
PMID 33710370
PQID 2549837780
PQPubID 54162
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8270793
proquest_miscellaneous_2501254569
proquest_journals_2549837780
pubmed_primary_33710370
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_021_07696_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_07696_1
springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_021_07696_1
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European radiology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Radiol
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Radiol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Walsh, Shore, Auvinen, Jung, Wakeford (CR4) 2014; 34
Palen, Sharpe, Shetterly, Steiner (CR20) 2019; 213
Brambilla, De Mauri, Lizio (CR23) 2014; 30
Desmond, McWilliams, Maher, Shanahan, Quigley (CR14) 2012; 10
CR6
Moriarity, Klochko, Obrien, Halabi (CR19) 2015; 12
CR18
De Mauri, Brambilla, Izzo (CR13) 2012; 27
CR17
CR9
Vano (CR5) 2020; 40
CR24
Brambilla, Cerini, Lizio, Vigna, Carriero, Fossaceca (CR15) 2015; 120
Smith-Bindman, Wang, Chu (CR8) 2019; 364
CR22
Rehani, Yang, Melick (CR2) 2019; 30
Durand, Dixon, Morin (CR3) 2012; 9
CR21
Eisenhauer, Therasse, Bogaerts (CR10) 2009; 45
Brambilla, Vassileva, Kuchcinska, Rehani (CR1) 2020; 30
(CR7) 2019
Manning, O’Neill, Haider, Colgan, Madhavan, Moore (CR16) 2009; 49
Rehani, Melick, Alvi (CR11) 2020; 30
Brambilla, De Mauri, Leva, Carriero, Picano (CR12) 2013; 126
L Walsh (7696_CR4) 2014; 34
7696_CR24
DJ Durand (7696_CR3) 2012; 9
EA Eisenhauer (7696_CR10) 2009; 45
7696_CR22
R Smith-Bindman (7696_CR8) 2019; 364
AN Desmond (7696_CR14) 2012; 10
E Vano (7696_CR5) 2020; 40
TE Palen (7696_CR20) 2019; 213
7696_CR21
M Brambilla (7696_CR15) 2015; 120
M Brambilla (7696_CR1) 2020; 30
AK Moriarity (7696_CR19) 2015; 12
7696_CR17
7696_CR18
BJ Manning (7696_CR16) 2009; 49
A De Mauri (7696_CR13) 2012; 27
MM Rehani (7696_CR2) 2019; 30
MM Rehani (7696_CR11) 2020; 30
M Brambilla (7696_CR23) 2014; 30
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (7696_CR7) 2019
7696_CR9
7696_CR6
M Brambilla (7696_CR12) 2013; 126
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 259
  year: 2012
  end-page: 265
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging among patients with gastrointestinal disorders
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.007
– volume: 120
  start-page: 563
  year: 2015
  end-page: 570
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Cumulative radiation dose and radiation risk from medical imaging in patients subjected to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
  publication-title: Radiol Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0485-x
– ident: CR21
– ident: CR22
– ident: CR18
– volume: 126
  start-page: 480
  year: 2013
  end-page: 486
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in chronic adult patients
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.10.025
– volume: 30
  start-page: 403
  year: 2014
  end-page: 412
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review
  publication-title: Phys Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.12.005
– ident: CR17
– volume: 34
  start-page: E1
  year: 2014
  end-page: E5
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Risks from CT scans–what do recent studies tell us?
  publication-title: J Radiol Prot
  doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/E1
– year: 2019
  ident: CR7
  publication-title: Medical radiation exposure of patients in the United States, NCRP report 184
– ident: CR9
– volume: 213
  start-page: 1015
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1020
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of a clinical decision support tool for improving the appropriateness scores for ordering imaging studies in primary and specialty care ambulatory clinics
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21511
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1839
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1846
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06551-8
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3645
  year: 2012
  end-page: 3651
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in kidney transplant patients
  publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant
  doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs145
– ident: CR6
– volume: 364
  start-page: k493
  year: 2019
  ident: CR8
  article-title: International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 9
  start-page: 480
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  end-page: 485
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Utilization strategies for cumulative dose estimates: a review and rational assessment
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.03.003
– volume: 45
  start-page: 228
  year: 2009
  end-page: 247
  ident: CR10
  article-title: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
– volume: 12
  start-page: 358
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 363
  ident: CR19
  article-title: The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2493
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2501
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1828
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1836
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y
– volume: 40
  start-page: E14
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: E17
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Recurrent imaging procedures with ionising radiation on the same patient. Should we pay more attention?
  publication-title: J Radiol Prot
  doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab7fbb
– volume: 49
  start-page: 60
  year: 2009
  end-page: 65
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Duplex ultrasound in aneurysm surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparison with computed tomography aortography
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.079
– ident: CR24
– ident: 7696_CR6
– volume: 120
  start-page: 563
  year: 2015
  ident: 7696_CR15
  publication-title: Radiol Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0485-x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3645
  year: 2012
  ident: 7696_CR13
  publication-title: Nephrol Dial Transplant
  doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs145
– volume: 10
  start-page: 259
  year: 2012
  ident: 7696_CR14
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.007
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2493
  year: 2020
  ident: 7696_CR1
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7
– volume: 364
  start-page: k493
  year: 2019
  ident: 7696_CR8
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 9
  start-page: 480
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 7696_CR3
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.03.003
– ident: 7696_CR21
  doi: 10.26044/esi2020/ESI-11078
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1828
  year: 2019
  ident: 7696_CR2
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1839
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 7696_CR11
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06551-8
– ident: 7696_CR22
– ident: 7696_CR9
– ident: 7696_CR24
– volume: 12
  start-page: 358
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 7696_CR19
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013
– volume: 45
  start-page: 228
  year: 2009
  ident: 7696_CR10
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
– volume: 34
  start-page: E1
  year: 2014
  ident: 7696_CR4
  publication-title: J Radiol Prot
  doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/E1
– volume: 213
  start-page: 1015
  year: 2019
  ident: 7696_CR20
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21511
– volume-title: Medical radiation exposure of patients in the United States, NCRP report 184
  year: 2019
  ident: 7696_CR7
– volume: 49
  start-page: 60
  year: 2009
  ident: 7696_CR16
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.079
– volume: 126
  start-page: 480
  year: 2013
  ident: 7696_CR12
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.10.025
– volume: 30
  start-page: 403
  year: 2014
  ident: 7696_CR23
  publication-title: Phys Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.12.005
– volume: 40
  start-page: E14
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 7696_CR5
  publication-title: J Radiol Prot
  doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab7fbb
– ident: 7696_CR17
– ident: 7696_CR18
SSID ssj0009147
Score 2.538469
Snippet In recent years, the issue of cumulative effective dose received from recurrent computed tomography examinations has become a subject of increasing concern...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 5514
SubjectTerms Artificial intelligence
Background radiation
Cancer
Computed Tomography
Decision support systems
Diagnostic Radiology
Exposure
Health risks
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Management systems
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Optimization
Patients
Physicians
Polls & surveys
Radiation
Radiation dosage
Radiation effects
Radiology
Risk
System effectiveness
Tomography
Trauma
Ultrasound
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwEB1BkRAXxDcpBRmJG1jEiTeOuSC0oipI5UBbaW-R7dh0JZosm01V_gK_Go_jZLVU9BbJdhxnxvZ4PPMewBtupLfbHKP-8JNRrhmnUpmM6txJ5oTVUmE28vG34uiMf13MFtHh1sWwynFNDAt13Rr0kb_Hg4x_nyjTj6tfFFmj8HY1UmjchjsIXYZaLRZiC7rLAsGYP7SXVEjJY9JMSJ1DErOUYoCCP8nLgrLdjematXk9aPKfm9OwIR0-gPvRkiSfBtE_hFu2eQR3j-Nd-WP4M-8vAjfXpSVD1AY-1W1nCeaUkDV62hGbicxPib1SGBMTlJAsGzI46T-QFZIodL4bb9uSMYuS_OiXNWoLwT2wJm1DlG9y8j00O1HOki8Xgf2IdP360v5-AmeHn0_nRzQyL1DDBd9Qbr1VlGkntGHGloplupZFmTueqsIKbxQpZl3pnEm1SpXMnCiZ8yV-fTWpU_lT2Gvaxj4HwpSbcZtKXUjNjeZK50Uh3IwJ5rJcuQTY-NsrE2HJkR3jZzUBKgdRVV5UVRBVxRJ4O7VZDaAcN9Y-GKVZxQnaVVt1SuD1VOynFt6XqMa2PdbxuzdamDKBZ4Pwp-7yXGCGpW8tdtRiqoCw3bslzfI8wHeXWUAlTODdqEDbz_r_KPZvHsULuJcFZcbQxAPY26x7-9KbSxv9KsyJv_QPErc
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-021-07696-1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33710370
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2549837780
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2501254569
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8270793
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1fb9MwELdgkxAviP8ERmUk3sBSnLhxzFsbtRugVWhbpfIU2a49KrF0apsJvgKfmjsnzdQNkHixI9mOk9w5d2ff_Y6Qt8Iq0Ns8Z2D8JEwYLpjSNmEm9Yp76YzSGI18PMmOpuLTrD9rYXIwFubG-T2CfYLFzdCRACxulTGwdPb7PJWYpqHIimuAXR6SiYGBnjOplGgDZP58j10hdEuzvO0geeOUNAif8UPyoNUa6aAh8yNyx1WPyb3j9lz8CflV1BchD9eVo42HBl7Nl2tHMX6ErnBXHXGYaHFG3Q-N_i-B4eiios2G_Ad6iQkT1jAN6LF0GzFJz-vFHDmDoryb02VFNQw5PQnDTrV39ONFyHRE1_Xqyv18Sqbj0VlxxNosC8wKKTZMONCAEuOlsdy6XPPEzFWWp17EOnMSFCDNnc-9t7HRsVaJlzn30AL_Uht7nT4je9Wyci8I5dr3hYuVyZQR1ght0iyTvs8l90mqfUT49rOXtoUgx0wY38sOPDmQqgRSlYFUJY_Iu27MZQPA8c_eB1tqlu1iXJdoAwMryjyOyJuuGZYRno3oyi1r7AOSGrVJFZHnDfG76dJUYjQljJY7bNF1QIju3ZZq8S1AdedJQCCMyPstA10_1t_f4uX_dX9F7ieBudEt8YDsbVa1ew2q0sb0yF05k1Dm48Me2R-Mh8MJ1odfP4-gHo4mX056YR1BOU0GvwGFbRK2
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4k2ggJHgBBax441jJITQwrJLuz3QrdRbsBMbVqLJstkU-hf4MfxGPM5jtVT01lskPxJnxjNjz-ND6BnPpLPbLCXu8MMI15QTqTJGdGQltcJoqSAbebofjw_5p6PB0Rb60-XCQFhlJxO9oM7LDO7IX8FBxs0nkvDt4gcB1CjwrnYQGg1b7JrTn-7IVr2ZvHf0fc7Y6MNsOCYtqgDJuOArwo3T-ExboTOamURRpnMZJ5HloYqNcApfUWMTa7NQq1BJZkVCrWtxsiMLrYrcvJfQZR45TQ6Z6aOP6yK_1AOahdIJESElb5N0fKoegKaFBAIiQhHLmNBNRXjGuj0bpPmPp9YrwNENdL21XPG7htVuoi1T3EJXpq1v_jb6PayPPRbYicFNlAg85WVlMOSw4CXc7EMtKDycYfNLQQyOZ3o8L3DjFHiNFwDaULnXOFsad1mb-Gs9z4E7MejcHJcFVm7IwWc_7EBZgyfHHm0JV_XyxJzeQYcXQpO7aLsoC3MfYarsgJtQ6lhqnmmudBTHwg6ooJZFygaIdr89zdoy6IDG8T3tCzh7UqWOVKknVUoD9KIfs2iKgJzbe6ejZtoKhCpds2-AnvbNbiuDf0YVpqyhj7MWwKKVAbrXEL9_XRQJyOh0o8UGW_QdoEz4Zksx_-bLhSfMV0EM0MuOgdaf9f9VPDh_FU_Q1fFsupfuTfZ3H6JrzDM2hEXuoO3VsjaPnKm20o_9_sDoy0VvyL-_QlC9
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFD4anTTxgrgTGGAkeIJoceLGMRJC0K1aGaumXaS9BTuxoRJLStsM9hf4Sfw6fJxLVSb2trdItnM7V_tcPoCXLBPWbzPUt5uf0GeKMl_ILPRVZAQ1XCshsRp5fxzvnrBPp_3TNfjT1sJgWmWrE52izssMz8i3cCNj78eTYMs0aREH28P30x8-IkhhpLWF06hZZE9f_LTbt_m70bal9aswHO4cD3b9BmHAzxhnC59pa_1DZbjKaKYTSUOViziJDAtkrLk1_pJqkxiTBUoGUoSGJ9TYEatHssDIyN73Bqxz3BX1YP3jzvjgcNnylzp4s0BYlcKFYE3JjivcQwi1wMf0iIDHIvbpqlm85OteTtn8J27rzOHwNtxq_FjyoWa8O7Cmi7uwsd9E6u_B70F15pDBzjWpc0bwKi_nmmBFC5nhOT92hiKDY6J_SczIcSJAJgWpQwRvyRQhHOb2MdazJm0NJ_laTXLkVYIWOCdlQaRdcnTolh1Jo8nozGEvkXk1O9cX9-HkWqjyAHpFWehHQKg0faYDoWKhWKaYVFEcc9OnnJowksYD2v72NGuaoiM2x_e0a-fsSJVaUqWOVCn14HW3Zlq3BLly9mZLzbRRD_N0ycwevOiGrWBjtEYWuqxwjvUd0L8VHjysid89Loo41nfa1XyFLboJ2DR8daSYfHPNw5PQ9UT04E3LQMvX-v9XPL76K57DhhXG9PNovPcEboaOrzFHchN6i1mln1q_baGeNQJC4Mt1y-RfC9RWTw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cumulative+effective+dose+from+recurrent+CT+examinations+in+Europe%3A+proposal+for+clinical+guidance+based+on+an+ESR+EuroSafe+Imaging+survey&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Frija%2C+Guy&rft.au=Damilakis%2C+John&rft.au=Paulo%2C+Graciano&rft.au=Loose%2C+Reinhard&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-021-07696-1&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0938-7994&client=summon