Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey

Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Methods Fifty-seven internation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgical oncology Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 2063 - 2072
Main Authors van Rijswijk, A. S., Hagens, E. R. C., van der Peet, D. L., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Gisbertz, S. S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.07.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Methods Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. Results The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. Conclusion There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.
AbstractList Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.
Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Methods Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. Results The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. Conclusion There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.
IntroductionEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.MethodsFifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.ResultsThe response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.ConclusionThere is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.
Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.INTRODUCTIONEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.METHODSFifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.RESULTSThe response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.CONCLUSIONThere is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.
Author Hagens, E. R. C.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
van der Peet, D. L.
Gisbertz, S. S.
van Rijswijk, A. S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A. S.
  surname: van Rijswijk
  fullname: van Rijswijk, A. S.
  organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
– sequence: 2
  givenname: E. R. C.
  surname: Hagens
  fullname: Hagens, E. R. C.
  organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D. L.
  surname: van der Peet
  fullname: van der Peet, D. L.
  organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M. I.
  surname: van Berge Henegouwen
  fullname: van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
  organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
– sequence: 5
  givenname: S. S.
  surname: Gisbertz
  fullname: Gisbertz, S. S.
  email: s.s.gisbertz@amc.nl
  organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Ustu1DAUtVARfcAPsECR2LBJseNHHBZI1TAtlUZiQVlbHud6xlViD3ZSNZ_AX-PJlAJddGXr3nOOz_U9p-jIBw8IvSX4nFSMf0wEM8pKTJoS15SIsnmBTgjPJSYkOcp3LGTZVIIfo9OUbjEmNcX8FTqmuMGUVvQE_frirIUI3kAqnC-WKey2egO6KxY6F2PxfYwbiNO-eQOxT0Wwc82ZjLnY7WLQZlto3xbL-wH8sO-vpj6rtODBDKGfPhWXzrfOb2ay9sW1HyB6Pbjgs0hWu4PpNXppdZfgzcN5hn5cLm8WX8vVt6vrxcWqNKxmQ8mM4HVrBLA1F2vNq5a0tpEgcM11rRtbk4rUHEtimdSVNlxoK2BNjLTSmJqeoc8H3d247qE12XLUndpF1-s4qaCd-r_j3VZtwp0SnPGsnAU-PAjE8HOENKjeJQNdpz2EMamKNIJXUmCZoe-fQG_DmAfvZhSvKZWz4Lt_HT1a-bOlDKgOABNDShHsI4RgtY-COkRB5SioOQqqyST5hGTcMH95nsp1z1PpgZryOz5v_6_tZ1i_AWWyymA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_14427
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12061592
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10560_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_06_038
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2020_06_021
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005394
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2020_103069
crossref_primary_10_20517_ais_2024_47
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2024_06_026
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2020_0079
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doad065
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2020_09_022
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17050888
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000024100
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2020_08_026
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_5761_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_020_07696_0
crossref_primary_10_1159_000524928
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac047
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doab011
crossref_primary_10_3390_lymphatics1020008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_022_02460_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac081
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13019_022_01774_1
crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S232930
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12072657
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12955_022_02084_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2021_04_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2023_04_014
Cites_doi 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0
10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee
10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124
10.1056/NEJMoa022343
10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9
10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0
10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-5
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf
10.21037/acs.2017.03.16
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.022
10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d
10.21037/acs.2017.03.04
10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000965
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001737
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000249
10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-1
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.004
10.1002/cncr.23309
10.1200/JCO.2003.12.095
10.1056/NEJMoa055531
10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056
10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598
10.1093/annonc/mds181
10.1007/BF01427033
10.1002/jso.22148
10.1067/msy.2001.110024
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x
10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2019
Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2019
– notice: Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Database Suite (ProQuest)
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1534-4681
EndPage 2072
ExternalDocumentID PMC6545175
30903323
10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
23M
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2WC
2~H
30V
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5VS
67Z
6J9
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACREN
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
ESBYG
F5P
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GX1
GXS
H13
HEOXT
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HZ~
I09
IH2
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N9A
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OWW
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R89
R9I
RHV
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
S16
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOQ
YFH
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z91
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
-Y2
1SB
28-
2P1
2VQ
5QI
AANXM
AAPKM
AARHV
AAYTO
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABQSL
ABULA
ACBXY
ACMFV
ACSTC
ACUDM
ADHKG
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEKMD
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFEXP
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGGDS
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
AJBLW
ATHPR
AYFIA
BBWZM
C1A
CAG
CITATION
COF
EN4
FEDTE
GRRUI
HVGLF
KOW
N2Q
NDZJH
O9-
OVD
PHGZM
PHGZT
R4E
RNI
RZK
S1Z
S26
S28
SCLPG
SDE
T16
TEORI
3V.
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TO
7XB
8FK
ABRTQ
H94
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4c657dc6e4b56ba52d1df98e6075a7a9f712175081f48a2ac56af6eb1c8f8cc73
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 1068-9265
1534-4681
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:07:41 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:46:42 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:50:51 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:32:10 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:14 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:08:47 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:44:57 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-4c657dc6e4b56ba52d1df98e6075a7a9f712175081f48a2ac56af6eb1c8f8cc73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
PMID 30903323
PQID 2195733875
PQPubID 32486
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6545175
proquest_miscellaneous_2196528608
proquest_journals_2195733875
pubmed_primary_30903323
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9
crossref_citationtrail_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9
springer_journals_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Cham
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Cham
– name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Annals of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Springer International Publishing
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer International Publishing
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Nafteux P, Depypere L, Van Veer H, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 152–158.
ArnoldMSoerjomataramIFerlayJFormanDGlobal incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012Gut.20156438138710.1136/gutjnl-2014-30812425320104
ChengJKongLHuangWLiBLiHWangZExplore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastasesJ Thorac Oncol.2013835936510.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d23263689
LiHYangSZhangYXiangJChenHThoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomaJ Surg Oncol.201210554855210.1002/jso.2214822105736
MarietteCPiessenGOesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?Eur J Surg Oncol.20123821021310.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.0221:STN:280:DC%2BC383gtlGgtQ%3D%3D22236956
IgakiHKatoHTachimoriYSatoHPrognostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinomas of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissectionEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20011988789310.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-11:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjs1aqsg%3D%3D11404147
ClaassenYHMHartgrinkHHDikkenJLde SteurWOvan SandickJWvan GriekenNCTSurgical morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trialEur J Surg Oncol.20184461361910.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.0041:STN:280:DC%2BC1MrnsFektg%3D%3D29503129
HulscherJBFvan SandickJWde BoerAGEMvan WijnhovenBPLTijssenJGPFockensPExtended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagusN Engl J Med.20023471662166910.1056/NEJMoa02234312444180
Dutch Institute for Clinical Audit. Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2017).
AltorkiNHarrisonSWhat is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?Ann Cardiothorac Surg.2017616717410.21037/acs.2017.03.16284470065387137
PhillipsAWLagardeSMNavidiMDisepBGriffinSMImpact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival, post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transthoracic esophagectomyAnn Surg.201726575075610.1097/SLA.000000000000173727467444
Van De VenCDe LeynPCoosemansWVan RaemdonckDLerutTThree-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junctionEur J Cardio-thoracic Surg.19991576977310.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0
ChenJLiuSPanJZhengXZhuKZhuJThe pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinomaEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20093648048610.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.05619502077
ShapiroJvan LanschotJJBHulshofMCCMvan HagenPvan Berge HenegouwenMIWijnhovenBPLNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2015161090109810.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
CunninghamDAllumWHStenningSPThompsonJNVan de VeldeCJHNicolsonMPerioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancerN Engl J Med.2006355112010.1056/NEJMoa0555311:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xms1Chsrw%3D
MarietteCPiessenGBriezNTribouletJPThe number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extentAnn Surg.200824736537110.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf18216546
AndereggMCJGisbertzSSvan Berge HenegouwenMIMinimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancerBest Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.201428415210.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.00224485254
ShiozakiHYanoMTsujinakaTInoueMTamuraSDokiYLymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancerDis Esophagus.20011419119610.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtl2mtA%3D%3D11869318
Koen TalsmaAShapiroJLoomanCWNVan HagenPSteyerbergEWVan Der GaastALymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prognostic and therapeutic impact on survivalAnn Surg.201426078679310.1097/SLA.00000000000009651:STN:280:DC%2BC2M3mslGqtw%3D%3D25379850
American Cancer SocietyGlobal cancer facts & figures20153AtlantaAmerican Cancer Society164
AndoNIizukaTIdeHIshidaKShinodaMNishimakiTSurgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group study - JCOG9204J Clin Oncol.2003214592459610.1200/JCO.2003.12.09514673047
SasakoMSanoTYamamotoSSairenjiMAraiKKinoshitaTLeft thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2006764465110.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-516887481
GuptaBKumarNWorldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagusEur J Cancer Prev.201726210711810.1097/CEJ.000000000000024927014938
DresnerSMLambPJBennettMKHayesNGriffinSMThe pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionSurgery.200112910310910.1067/msy.2001.1100241:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ht1Shuw%3D%3D11150040
KosugiSKawaguchiYKandaTIshikawaTSakamotoKAkaikeHCervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusAnn Surg Oncol.2013204016402110.1245/s10434-013-3141-023892526
RizkNPIshwaranHRiceTWChenLQSchipperPHKeslerKAOptimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancerAnn Surg.2010251465010.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee20032718
CastoroCScarpaMCagolMRuolACavallinFAlfieriRNodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distributionAnn Surg Oncol.2011183743375410.1245/s10434-011-1753-921556952
ZhangYEpidemiology of esophageal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol.2013195598560610.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598240393513769895
SharmaSFujitaHYamanaHKakegawaTPatterns of lymph node metastasis in 3-field dissection for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagusSurg Today.199424541041410.1007/BF014270331:STN:280:DyaK2czjtF2gsA%3D%3D8054811
ThriftAPWhitemanDCThe incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trendsAnn Oncol.2012233155316210.1093/annonc/mds1811:STN:280:DC%2BC38fkt1yisA%3D%3D22847812
GreensteinAJLitleVRSwansonSJDivinoCMPackerSWisniveskyJPEffect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancerCancer.20081121239124610.1002/cncr.2330918224663
TachimoriYNagaiYKanamoriNHokamuraNIgakiHPattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage systemDis Esophagus.201124333810.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7hsFKhsg%3D%3D20626450
S Sharma (7316_CR18) 1994; 24
C Mariette (7316_CR10) 2012; 38
N Ando (7316_CR22) 2003; 21
M Sasako (7316_CR25) 2006; 7
American Cancer Society (7316_CR1) 2015
AJ Greenstein (7316_CR7) 2008; 112
J Shapiro (7316_CR5) 2015; 16
H Igaki (7316_CR15) 2001; 19
Y Tachimori (7316_CR20) 2011; 24
7316_CR28
7316_CR27
D Cunningham (7316_CR23) 2006; 355
AP Thrift (7316_CR3) 2012; 23
H Li (7316_CR17) 2012; 105
AW Phillips (7316_CR30) 2017; 265
SM Dresner (7316_CR14) 2001; 129
Y Zhang (7316_CR24) 2013; 19
NP Rizk (7316_CR31) 2010; 251
C Ven Van De (7316_CR21) 1999; 15
A Koen Talsma (7316_CR29) 2014; 260
C Castoro (7316_CR12) 2011; 18
H Shiozaki (7316_CR19) 2001; 14
N Altorki (7316_CR9) 2017; 6
J Chen (7316_CR13) 2009; 36
M Arnold (7316_CR2) 2015; 64
S Kosugi (7316_CR16) 2013; 20
B Gupta (7316_CR4) 2017; 26
YHM Claassen (7316_CR32) 2018; 44
C Mariette (7316_CR8) 2008; 247
J Cheng (7316_CR6) 2013; 8
JBF Hulscher (7316_CR26) 2002; 347
MCJ Anderegg (7316_CR11) 2014; 28
References_xml – reference: ArnoldMSoerjomataramIFerlayJFormanDGlobal incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012Gut.20156438138710.1136/gutjnl-2014-30812425320104
– reference: ShapiroJvan LanschotJJBHulshofMCCMvan HagenPvan Berge HenegouwenMIWijnhovenBPLNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2015161090109810.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
– reference: KosugiSKawaguchiYKandaTIshikawaTSakamotoKAkaikeHCervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusAnn Surg Oncol.2013204016402110.1245/s10434-013-3141-023892526
– reference: GuptaBKumarNWorldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagusEur J Cancer Prev.201726210711810.1097/CEJ.000000000000024927014938
– reference: ShiozakiHYanoMTsujinakaTInoueMTamuraSDokiYLymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancerDis Esophagus.20011419119610.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtl2mtA%3D%3D11869318
– reference: CunninghamDAllumWHStenningSPThompsonJNVan de VeldeCJHNicolsonMPerioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancerN Engl J Med.2006355112010.1056/NEJMoa0555311:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xms1Chsrw%3D
– reference: AndereggMCJGisbertzSSvan Berge HenegouwenMIMinimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancerBest Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.201428415210.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.00224485254
– reference: Nafteux P, Depypere L, Van Veer H, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 152–158.
– reference: ChengJKongLHuangWLiBLiHWangZExplore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastasesJ Thorac Oncol.2013835936510.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d23263689
– reference: ChenJLiuSPanJZhengXZhuKZhuJThe pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinomaEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20093648048610.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.05619502077
– reference: MarietteCPiessenGOesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?Eur J Surg Oncol.20123821021310.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.0221:STN:280:DC%2BC383gtlGgtQ%3D%3D22236956
– reference: ThriftAPWhitemanDCThe incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trendsAnn Oncol.2012233155316210.1093/annonc/mds1811:STN:280:DC%2BC38fkt1yisA%3D%3D22847812
– reference: Van De VenCDe LeynPCoosemansWVan RaemdonckDLerutTThree-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junctionEur J Cardio-thoracic Surg.19991576977310.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0
– reference: DresnerSMLambPJBennettMKHayesNGriffinSMThe pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionSurgery.200112910310910.1067/msy.2001.1100241:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ht1Shuw%3D%3D11150040
– reference: AltorkiNHarrisonSWhat is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?Ann Cardiothorac Surg.2017616717410.21037/acs.2017.03.16284470065387137
– reference: HulscherJBFvan SandickJWde BoerAGEMvan WijnhovenBPLTijssenJGPFockensPExtended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagusN Engl J Med.20023471662166910.1056/NEJMoa02234312444180
– reference: ClaassenYHMHartgrinkHHDikkenJLde SteurWOvan SandickJWvan GriekenNCTSurgical morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trialEur J Surg Oncol.20184461361910.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.0041:STN:280:DC%2BC1MrnsFektg%3D%3D29503129
– reference: AndoNIizukaTIdeHIshidaKShinodaMNishimakiTSurgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group study - JCOG9204J Clin Oncol.2003214592459610.1200/JCO.2003.12.09514673047
– reference: Dutch Institute for Clinical Audit. Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2017).
– reference: MarietteCPiessenGBriezNTribouletJPThe number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extentAnn Surg.200824736537110.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf18216546
– reference: SharmaSFujitaHYamanaHKakegawaTPatterns of lymph node metastasis in 3-field dissection for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagusSurg Today.199424541041410.1007/BF014270331:STN:280:DyaK2czjtF2gsA%3D%3D8054811
– reference: LiHYangSZhangYXiangJChenHThoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomaJ Surg Oncol.201210554855210.1002/jso.2214822105736
– reference: Koen TalsmaAShapiroJLoomanCWNVan HagenPSteyerbergEWVan Der GaastALymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prognostic and therapeutic impact on survivalAnn Surg.201426078679310.1097/SLA.00000000000009651:STN:280:DC%2BC2M3mslGqtw%3D%3D25379850
– reference: GreensteinAJLitleVRSwansonSJDivinoCMPackerSWisniveskyJPEffect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancerCancer.20081121239124610.1002/cncr.2330918224663
– reference: CastoroCScarpaMCagolMRuolACavallinFAlfieriRNodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distributionAnn Surg Oncol.2011183743375410.1245/s10434-011-1753-921556952
– reference: IgakiHKatoHTachimoriYSatoHPrognostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinomas of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissectionEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20011988789310.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-11:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjs1aqsg%3D%3D11404147
– reference: American Cancer SocietyGlobal cancer facts & figures20153AtlantaAmerican Cancer Society164
– reference: PhillipsAWLagardeSMNavidiMDisepBGriffinSMImpact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival, post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transthoracic esophagectomyAnn Surg.201726575075610.1097/SLA.000000000000173727467444
– reference: RizkNPIshwaranHRiceTWChenLQSchipperPHKeslerKAOptimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancerAnn Surg.2010251465010.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee20032718
– reference: SasakoMSanoTYamamotoSSairenjiMAraiKKinoshitaTLeft thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2006764465110.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-516887481
– reference: TachimoriYNagaiYKanamoriNHokamuraNIgakiHPattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage systemDis Esophagus.201124333810.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7hsFKhsg%3D%3D20626450
– reference: ZhangYEpidemiology of esophageal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol.2013195598560610.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598240393513769895
– volume: 20
  start-page: 4016
  year: 2013
  ident: 7316_CR16
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1090
  year: 2015
  ident: 7316_CR5
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
– volume: 251
  start-page: 46
  year: 2010
  ident: 7316_CR31
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee
– volume: 64
  start-page: 381
  year: 2015
  ident: 7316_CR2
  publication-title: Gut.
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124
– volume: 347
  start-page: 1662
  year: 2002
  ident: 7316_CR26
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022343
– volume: 18
  start-page: 3743
  year: 2011
  ident: 7316_CR12
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9
– volume: 15
  start-page: 769
  year: 1999
  ident: 7316_CR21
  publication-title: Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0
– volume: 7
  start-page: 644
  year: 2006
  ident: 7316_CR25
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-5
– volume: 247
  start-page: 365
  year: 2008
  ident: 7316_CR8
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf
– ident: 7316_CR27
– volume: 6
  start-page: 167
  year: 2017
  ident: 7316_CR9
  publication-title: Ann Cardiothorac Surg.
  doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.16
– volume: 38
  start-page: 210
  year: 2012
  ident: 7316_CR10
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.022
– volume: 8
  start-page: 359
  year: 2013
  ident: 7316_CR6
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol.
  doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d
– ident: 7316_CR28
  doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.04
– volume: 14
  start-page: 191
  year: 2001
  ident: 7316_CR19
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x
– volume: 260
  start-page: 786
  year: 2014
  ident: 7316_CR29
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000965
– volume: 265
  start-page: 750
  year: 2017
  ident: 7316_CR30
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001737
– volume: 26
  start-page: 107
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 7316_CR4
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer Prev.
  doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000249
– volume: 19
  start-page: 887
  year: 2001
  ident: 7316_CR15
  publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-1
– volume: 44
  start-page: 613
  year: 2018
  ident: 7316_CR32
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.004
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1239
  year: 2008
  ident: 7316_CR7
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309
– volume: 21
  start-page: 4592
  year: 2003
  ident: 7316_CR22
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.095
– volume: 355
  start-page: 11
  year: 2006
  ident: 7316_CR23
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531
– volume: 36
  start-page: 480
  year: 2009
  ident: 7316_CR13
  publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056
– volume: 19
  start-page: 5598
  year: 2013
  ident: 7316_CR24
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598
– volume: 23
  start-page: 3155
  year: 2012
  ident: 7316_CR3
  publication-title: Ann Oncol.
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds181
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Global cancer facts & figures
  year: 2015
  ident: 7316_CR1
– volume: 24
  start-page: 410
  issue: 5
  year: 1994
  ident: 7316_CR18
  publication-title: Surg Today.
  doi: 10.1007/BF01427033
– volume: 105
  start-page: 548
  year: 2012
  ident: 7316_CR17
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1002/jso.22148
– volume: 129
  start-page: 103
  year: 2001
  ident: 7316_CR14
  publication-title: Surgery.
  doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.110024
– volume: 24
  start-page: 33
  year: 2011
  ident: 7316_CR20
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x
– volume: 28
  start-page: 41
  year: 2014
  ident: 7316_CR11
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002
SSID ssj0017305
Score 2.4651852
Snippet Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens...
Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary...
IntroductionEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2063
SubjectTerms Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Classification systems
Demography
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal carcinoma
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - trends
Esophagogastric Junction - pathology
Esophagogastric Junction - surgery
Esophagus
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
International Agencies
Lymph Node Excision - trends
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Middle Aged
Oncology
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends
Prognosis
Squamous cell carcinoma
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thoracic Oncology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED_BkBAviG8CAxmJN7Bo_JnwgqbRakKMFzapb5Hj2KLSSMfaIfVP4L_mznEzlYm9xnaT9Hd3-d3ZdwfwFlH2k2Akt0FFrowI3HU28kgxDxFCO-kooH_8zRydqi9zPc8Bt1U-Vrm1iclQd0tPMfIPqFlUug_p9afzX5y6RtHuam6hcRvuUOkyOtJl56PDVaL06rTbaVCphdE5aUYoTalzStL5C0rhkaXh9e6H6RrbvH5o8p-d0_RBmj2A-5lJsoMB-odwK_SP4O5x3it_DH8-594naAnYomdTaliA1gPXHBLUF-z7kBJNgydooFdsGdM1wo0d5GLjzPUdm1KofE3jXzcIv0NjRdH-n5uPbLZIeTFpsevZToSRfu132DyB09n05PCI58YL3Cur1lx5o23nTVCtNq3Toiu7WFfBIL9w1tXRlujJILUro6qccF4bFw1afV_Fynsrn8Jev-zDc2BeSu0MEgNpI7qSyE5qh15Kq1vkLlHFAsrtv974XJWcmmOcNeSdIFLNgFSDSDUJqaYu4N245nyoyXHj7P0tmE3Wz1VzJU0FvBmHUbNou8T1YXmZ5hgtKjOpCng2YD_eTlJ4SwpZgN2RinECVe3eHekXP1L1boOctaT7vt_Kz9Vj_f8tXtz8Fi_hnhhkGUV6H_bWF5fhFbKldfs6qcRf2rgRUw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2195733875
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2196528608
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6545175
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9NAEB-8OxBfxG9znmUF3zTQZL8S32pNPdQ7RK9Qn8Jms8sVND2uPaF_gv-1M5sPqaeCT4XsbtL2NzP5zczOLMBzRNmOneKxdsLHQqUuNrX2saeYR-pcNa4poH9yqo7n4t1CLrqisHW_271PSQZLHTogCEnFboLTjgkquuGJivM9OJDku6MUz9PJkDtAmZUhx6lQlVMlu1KZP99j93V0jWNe3yr5W740vIZmd-B2xx_ZpAX8LtxwzT24edJlyO_DjzfdiSeo_2zZsIKOKUCbgWumBPAl-9wWQtPgGZrlNVv5cI3QYpOuxTgzTc0KCpBvaPzDFkE3aKIoxv9t-4rNlqEaJiw2DduJK9LdvrvtA5jPirPpcdwdtxBbocUmFlZJXVvlRCVVZWRaJ7XPM6eQVRhtcq8T9F-Q0CVeZCY1VirjFdp6m_nMWs0fwn6zatxjYJZzaRTSAa49OpDISXKDvkklK2QsXvgIkv5fL23Xi5yOxPhakk-CSJUtUiUiVQakyjyCF8Oai7YTxz9nH_Vglp1Wrku0ztT-EV20CJ4Nw6hPlCQxjVtdhTlKppkaZxE8arEfHscpqMVTHoHekYphAvXq3h1pluehZ7dCpprQc1_28vPra_39Vxz-3_QncCttZRtF_Aj2N5dX7ilypk01gj290CM4mLz98r7Az9fF6cdPeHWqpqOgPj8BRXcTKg
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9NAEB6VVIK-IG4CBRYJnsAi3ss2EkKlTZTSJEKQSn0z6_WuGgmc0qSg_AT-DL-RGV9VqOhbX727vubYb2Z2ZgBeIJVtz2kRRE76QGruApNHPvDk8-DOZb2cHPrjiR4eyo9H6mgD_jS5MHSsstGJpaLO55Z85G9Qsqh0H8Lr9yc_AuoaRdHVpoVGxRYHbvULTbbFu_09pO9Lzgf96e4wqLsKBFZGchlIq1WUW-1kpnRmFM_D3Cex07h5msgkPgoRpiNuCb2MDTdWaeM1qjQb-9jaSOB9r8GmFGjKdGDzQ3_y6XMbt0B5UWV8VaMa4VrVaTpcKkrWk4JOfFDSkAh1kKxvhRfw7cVjmv_EasstcHALbtbYle1UzHYbNlxxB66P6-j8Xfi9V3dbQd3DZgXrU4sE1Fe4ZpeY65R9qZKwaXCKW8KCzX15jTiF7dTlzZkpctYn5_ySxkcrZDiD6pHiC99Xb9lgVmbilItNwdZ8mnS3n251Dw6vhCj3oVPMC_cQmBVCGY1QREQejVfEQ4lBuyhTGaIlL30Xwuavp7aug07tOL6lZA8hpdKKUilSKi0plSZdeNWuOamqgFw6e7shZlprhEV6zr9deN4OoyxTgMYUbn5WztGKx7oXd-FBRfv2cYIcaoKLLkRrXNFOoDrh6yPF7LisF64RJYf03NcN_5y_1v-_4tHlX_EMbgyn41E62p8cPIYtXvE1svc2dJanZ-4JYrVl9rQWEAZfr1om_wKJmFA8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZaxRBEC5ihOCLeDsatQV90iE7fc4IIiG7S2IOBBPYt7GnpxsXdDZmN8r-BP-Sv86qucIazFtep7vnqqO_quqqAniFVHYDr0VsvAyx1NzHtjQhDuTz4N4Xg5Ic-odHevdEfpyoyRr86XJh6FhlpxNrRV3OHPnIt1CyqHQfwuut0B6L-DQcfzj9EVMHKYq0du00GhbZ98tfaL7N3-8NkdavOR-Pjnd247bDQOykkYtYOq1M6bSXhdKFVbxMypClXuNGao3NgkkQsiOGSYJMLbdOaRs0qjeXhtQ5I_C-N-CmESohGTOT3thLUHJUHWnVqFC4Vm3CDpeK0vakoLMflD4kEh1nq5viJaR7-cDmP1HbejMc34HbLYpl2w3b3YU1X92DjcM2Tn8ffg_bviuohdi0YiNqloCaC9fsEJudsc9NOjYNHuPmMGezUF8jnmHbbaFzZquSjchNv6DxgyWynkVFSZGG78t3bDytc3LqxbZiK95NuttPv3wAJ9dCkoewXs0q_xiYE0JZjaBEmIBmLCKjzKKFVKgCcVOQIYKk--u5ayuiU2OObzlZRkipvKFUjpTKa0rlWQRv-jWnTT2QK2dvdsTMW90wzy84OYKX_TBKNYVqbOVn5_UcrXiqB2kEjxra948T5FoTXERgVriin0AVw1dHqunXunK4Rryc0HPfdvxz8Vr__4onV3_FC9hAScwP9o72n8It3rA1cvcmrC_Ozv0zBG2L4nktHQy-XLc4_gWDvFMM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+in+Esophageal+Cancer+Surgery+in+Terms+of+Surgical+Approach+and+Extent+of+Lymphadenectomy%3A+Findings+of+an+International+Survey&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=van+Rijswijk%2C+A.+S.&rft.au=Hagens%2C+E.+R.+C.&rft.au=van+der+Peet%2C+D.+L.&rft.au=van+Berge+Henegouwen%2C+M.+I.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.pub=Springer+International+Publishing&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2063&rft.epage=2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245%2Fs10434-019-07316-9&rft.externalDocID=10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon