Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Methods Fifty-seven internation...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of surgical oncology Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 2063 - 2072 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.07.2019
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Introduction
Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.
Methods
Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.
Results
The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.
Conclusion
There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.
Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.
The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.
There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. Introduction Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. Methods Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. Results The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. Conclusion There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. IntroductionEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.MethodsFifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.ResultsThe response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.ConclusionThere is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.INTRODUCTIONEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice.Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.METHODSFifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling.The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.RESULTSThe response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants.There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy.CONCLUSIONThere is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. |
Author | Hagens, E. R. C. van Berge Henegouwen, M. I. van der Peet, D. L. Gisbertz, S. S. van Rijswijk, A. S. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. S. surname: van Rijswijk fullname: van Rijswijk, A. S. organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam – sequence: 2 givenname: E. R. C. surname: Hagens fullname: Hagens, E. R. C. organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam – sequence: 3 givenname: D. L. surname: van der Peet fullname: van der Peet, D. L. organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam – sequence: 4 givenname: M. I. surname: van Berge Henegouwen fullname: van Berge Henegouwen, M. I. organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam – sequence: 5 givenname: S. S. surname: Gisbertz fullname: Gisbertz, S. S. email: s.s.gisbertz@amc.nl organization: Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Ustu1DAUtVARfcAPsECR2LBJseNHHBZI1TAtlUZiQVlbHud6xlViD3ZSNZ_AX-PJlAJddGXr3nOOz_U9p-jIBw8IvSX4nFSMf0wEM8pKTJoS15SIsnmBTgjPJSYkOcp3LGTZVIIfo9OUbjEmNcX8FTqmuMGUVvQE_frirIUI3kAqnC-WKey2egO6KxY6F2PxfYwbiNO-eQOxT0Wwc82ZjLnY7WLQZlto3xbL-wH8sO-vpj6rtODBDKGfPhWXzrfOb2ay9sW1HyB6Pbjgs0hWu4PpNXppdZfgzcN5hn5cLm8WX8vVt6vrxcWqNKxmQ8mM4HVrBLA1F2vNq5a0tpEgcM11rRtbk4rUHEtimdSVNlxoK2BNjLTSmJqeoc8H3d247qE12XLUndpF1-s4qaCd-r_j3VZtwp0SnPGsnAU-PAjE8HOENKjeJQNdpz2EMamKNIJXUmCZoe-fQG_DmAfvZhSvKZWz4Lt_HT1a-bOlDKgOABNDShHsI4RgtY-COkRB5SioOQqqyST5hGTcMH95nsp1z1PpgZryOz5v_6_tZ1i_AWWyymA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_14427 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12061592 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10560_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_06_038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2020_06_021 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000005394 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2020_103069 crossref_primary_10_20517_ais_2024_47 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2024_06_026 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2020_0079 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doad065 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2020_09_022 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17050888 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000024100 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2020_08_026 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_5761_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_020_07696_0 crossref_primary_10_1159_000524928 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac047 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doab011 crossref_primary_10_3390_lymphatics1020008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_022_02460_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac081 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13019_022_01774_1 crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S232930 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12072657 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12955_022_02084_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2021_04_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2023_04_014 |
Cites_doi | 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124 10.1056/NEJMoa022343 10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-5 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf 10.21037/acs.2017.03.16 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.022 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d 10.21037/acs.2017.03.04 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000965 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001737 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000249 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-1 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.004 10.1002/cncr.23309 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.095 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598 10.1093/annonc/mds181 10.1007/BF01427033 10.1002/jso.22148 10.1067/msy.2001.110024 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2019 Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2019 – notice: Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Database Suite (ProQuest) ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1534-4681 |
EndPage | 2072 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6545175 30903323 10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 203 23M 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2WC 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 67Z 6J9 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABOCM ABPLI ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABUWG ABUWZ ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIHN ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACREN ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGVAE AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BAWUL BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DIK DL5 DNIVK DPUIP E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMOBN ESBYG F5P FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GX1 GXS H13 HEOXT HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HZ~ I09 IH2 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N9A NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OWW P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R89 R9I RHV ROL RPX RRX RSV S16 S27 S37 S3B SAP SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 WOQ YFH YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z91 ZMTXR ZOVNA -Y2 1SB 28- 2P1 2VQ 5QI AANXM AAPKM AARHV AAYTO AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABQSL ABULA ACBXY ACMFV ACSTC ACUDM ADHKG AEBTG AEFIE AEKMD AEZWR AFDZB AFEXP AFHIU AFOHR AGGDS AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP AJBLW ATHPR AYFIA BBWZM C1A CAG CITATION COF EN4 FEDTE GRRUI HVGLF KOW N2Q NDZJH O9- OVD PHGZM PHGZT R4E RNI RZK S1Z S26 S28 SCLPG SDE T16 TEORI 3V. CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TO 7XB 8FK ABRTQ H94 K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS PUEGO 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-4c657dc6e4b56ba52d1df98e6075a7a9f712175081f48a2ac56af6eb1c8f8cc73 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:07:41 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:46:42 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 14:50:51 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:32:10 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:08:47 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:44:57 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c474t-4c657dc6e4b56ba52d1df98e6075a7a9f712175081f48a2ac56af6eb1c8f8cc73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9 |
PMID | 30903323 |
PQID | 2195733875 |
PQPubID | 32486 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6545175 proquest_miscellaneous_2196528608 proquest_journals_2195733875 pubmed_primary_30903323 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9 crossref_citationtrail_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9 springer_journals_10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2019 text: 2019-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Cham |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cham – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | Annals of surgical oncology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Ann Surg Oncol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Surg Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Springer International Publishing Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer International Publishing – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Nafteux P, Depypere L, Van Veer H, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 152–158. ArnoldMSoerjomataramIFerlayJFormanDGlobal incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012Gut.20156438138710.1136/gutjnl-2014-30812425320104 ChengJKongLHuangWLiBLiHWangZExplore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastasesJ Thorac Oncol.2013835936510.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d23263689 LiHYangSZhangYXiangJChenHThoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomaJ Surg Oncol.201210554855210.1002/jso.2214822105736 MarietteCPiessenGOesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?Eur J Surg Oncol.20123821021310.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.0221:STN:280:DC%2BC383gtlGgtQ%3D%3D22236956 IgakiHKatoHTachimoriYSatoHPrognostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinomas of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissectionEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20011988789310.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-11:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjs1aqsg%3D%3D11404147 ClaassenYHMHartgrinkHHDikkenJLde SteurWOvan SandickJWvan GriekenNCTSurgical morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trialEur J Surg Oncol.20184461361910.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.0041:STN:280:DC%2BC1MrnsFektg%3D%3D29503129 HulscherJBFvan SandickJWde BoerAGEMvan WijnhovenBPLTijssenJGPFockensPExtended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagusN Engl J Med.20023471662166910.1056/NEJMoa02234312444180 Dutch Institute for Clinical Audit. Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2017). AltorkiNHarrisonSWhat is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?Ann Cardiothorac Surg.2017616717410.21037/acs.2017.03.16284470065387137 PhillipsAWLagardeSMNavidiMDisepBGriffinSMImpact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival, post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transthoracic esophagectomyAnn Surg.201726575075610.1097/SLA.000000000000173727467444 Van De VenCDe LeynPCoosemansWVan RaemdonckDLerutTThree-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junctionEur J Cardio-thoracic Surg.19991576977310.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0 ChenJLiuSPanJZhengXZhuKZhuJThe pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinomaEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20093648048610.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.05619502077 ShapiroJvan LanschotJJBHulshofMCCMvan HagenPvan Berge HenegouwenMIWijnhovenBPLNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2015161090109810.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6 CunninghamDAllumWHStenningSPThompsonJNVan de VeldeCJHNicolsonMPerioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancerN Engl J Med.2006355112010.1056/NEJMoa0555311:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xms1Chsrw%3D MarietteCPiessenGBriezNTribouletJPThe number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extentAnn Surg.200824736537110.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf18216546 AndereggMCJGisbertzSSvan Berge HenegouwenMIMinimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancerBest Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.201428415210.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.00224485254 ShiozakiHYanoMTsujinakaTInoueMTamuraSDokiYLymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancerDis Esophagus.20011419119610.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtl2mtA%3D%3D11869318 Koen TalsmaAShapiroJLoomanCWNVan HagenPSteyerbergEWVan Der GaastALymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prognostic and therapeutic impact on survivalAnn Surg.201426078679310.1097/SLA.00000000000009651:STN:280:DC%2BC2M3mslGqtw%3D%3D25379850 American Cancer SocietyGlobal cancer facts & figures20153AtlantaAmerican Cancer Society164 AndoNIizukaTIdeHIshidaKShinodaMNishimakiTSurgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group study - JCOG9204J Clin Oncol.2003214592459610.1200/JCO.2003.12.09514673047 SasakoMSanoTYamamotoSSairenjiMAraiKKinoshitaTLeft thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2006764465110.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-516887481 GuptaBKumarNWorldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagusEur J Cancer Prev.201726210711810.1097/CEJ.000000000000024927014938 DresnerSMLambPJBennettMKHayesNGriffinSMThe pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionSurgery.200112910310910.1067/msy.2001.1100241:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ht1Shuw%3D%3D11150040 KosugiSKawaguchiYKandaTIshikawaTSakamotoKAkaikeHCervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusAnn Surg Oncol.2013204016402110.1245/s10434-013-3141-023892526 RizkNPIshwaranHRiceTWChenLQSchipperPHKeslerKAOptimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancerAnn Surg.2010251465010.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee20032718 CastoroCScarpaMCagolMRuolACavallinFAlfieriRNodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distributionAnn Surg Oncol.2011183743375410.1245/s10434-011-1753-921556952 ZhangYEpidemiology of esophageal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol.2013195598560610.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598240393513769895 SharmaSFujitaHYamanaHKakegawaTPatterns of lymph node metastasis in 3-field dissection for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagusSurg Today.199424541041410.1007/BF014270331:STN:280:DyaK2czjtF2gsA%3D%3D8054811 ThriftAPWhitemanDCThe incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trendsAnn Oncol.2012233155316210.1093/annonc/mds1811:STN:280:DC%2BC38fkt1yisA%3D%3D22847812 GreensteinAJLitleVRSwansonSJDivinoCMPackerSWisniveskyJPEffect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancerCancer.20081121239124610.1002/cncr.2330918224663 TachimoriYNagaiYKanamoriNHokamuraNIgakiHPattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage systemDis Esophagus.201124333810.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7hsFKhsg%3D%3D20626450 S Sharma (7316_CR18) 1994; 24 C Mariette (7316_CR10) 2012; 38 N Ando (7316_CR22) 2003; 21 M Sasako (7316_CR25) 2006; 7 American Cancer Society (7316_CR1) 2015 AJ Greenstein (7316_CR7) 2008; 112 J Shapiro (7316_CR5) 2015; 16 H Igaki (7316_CR15) 2001; 19 Y Tachimori (7316_CR20) 2011; 24 7316_CR28 7316_CR27 D Cunningham (7316_CR23) 2006; 355 AP Thrift (7316_CR3) 2012; 23 H Li (7316_CR17) 2012; 105 AW Phillips (7316_CR30) 2017; 265 SM Dresner (7316_CR14) 2001; 129 Y Zhang (7316_CR24) 2013; 19 NP Rizk (7316_CR31) 2010; 251 C Ven Van De (7316_CR21) 1999; 15 A Koen Talsma (7316_CR29) 2014; 260 C Castoro (7316_CR12) 2011; 18 H Shiozaki (7316_CR19) 2001; 14 N Altorki (7316_CR9) 2017; 6 J Chen (7316_CR13) 2009; 36 M Arnold (7316_CR2) 2015; 64 S Kosugi (7316_CR16) 2013; 20 B Gupta (7316_CR4) 2017; 26 YHM Claassen (7316_CR32) 2018; 44 C Mariette (7316_CR8) 2008; 247 J Cheng (7316_CR6) 2013; 8 JBF Hulscher (7316_CR26) 2002; 347 MCJ Anderegg (7316_CR11) 2014; 28 |
References_xml | – reference: ArnoldMSoerjomataramIFerlayJFormanDGlobal incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012Gut.20156438138710.1136/gutjnl-2014-30812425320104 – reference: ShapiroJvan LanschotJJBHulshofMCCMvan HagenPvan Berge HenegouwenMIWijnhovenBPLNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2015161090109810.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6 – reference: KosugiSKawaguchiYKandaTIshikawaTSakamotoKAkaikeHCervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagusAnn Surg Oncol.2013204016402110.1245/s10434-013-3141-023892526 – reference: GuptaBKumarNWorldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagusEur J Cancer Prev.201726210711810.1097/CEJ.000000000000024927014938 – reference: ShiozakiHYanoMTsujinakaTInoueMTamuraSDokiYLymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancerDis Esophagus.20011419119610.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtl2mtA%3D%3D11869318 – reference: CunninghamDAllumWHStenningSPThompsonJNVan de VeldeCJHNicolsonMPerioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancerN Engl J Med.2006355112010.1056/NEJMoa0555311:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xms1Chsrw%3D – reference: AndereggMCJGisbertzSSvan Berge HenegouwenMIMinimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancerBest Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.201428415210.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.00224485254 – reference: Nafteux P, Depypere L, Van Veer H, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 152–158. – reference: ChengJKongLHuangWLiBLiHWangZExplore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastasesJ Thorac Oncol.2013835936510.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d23263689 – reference: ChenJLiuSPanJZhengXZhuKZhuJThe pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinomaEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20093648048610.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.05619502077 – reference: MarietteCPiessenGOesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?Eur J Surg Oncol.20123821021310.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.0221:STN:280:DC%2BC383gtlGgtQ%3D%3D22236956 – reference: ThriftAPWhitemanDCThe incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trendsAnn Oncol.2012233155316210.1093/annonc/mds1811:STN:280:DC%2BC38fkt1yisA%3D%3D22847812 – reference: Van De VenCDe LeynPCoosemansWVan RaemdonckDLerutTThree-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junctionEur J Cardio-thoracic Surg.19991576977310.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0 – reference: DresnerSMLambPJBennettMKHayesNGriffinSMThe pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionSurgery.200112910310910.1067/msy.2001.1100241:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ht1Shuw%3D%3D11150040 – reference: AltorkiNHarrisonSWhat is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?Ann Cardiothorac Surg.2017616717410.21037/acs.2017.03.16284470065387137 – reference: HulscherJBFvan SandickJWde BoerAGEMvan WijnhovenBPLTijssenJGPFockensPExtended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagusN Engl J Med.20023471662166910.1056/NEJMoa02234312444180 – reference: ClaassenYHMHartgrinkHHDikkenJLde SteurWOvan SandickJWvan GriekenNCTSurgical morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trialEur J Surg Oncol.20184461361910.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.0041:STN:280:DC%2BC1MrnsFektg%3D%3D29503129 – reference: AndoNIizukaTIdeHIshidaKShinodaMNishimakiTSurgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group study - JCOG9204J Clin Oncol.2003214592459610.1200/JCO.2003.12.09514673047 – reference: Dutch Institute for Clinical Audit. Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2017). – reference: MarietteCPiessenGBriezNTribouletJPThe number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extentAnn Surg.200824736537110.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf18216546 – reference: SharmaSFujitaHYamanaHKakegawaTPatterns of lymph node metastasis in 3-field dissection for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagusSurg Today.199424541041410.1007/BF014270331:STN:280:DyaK2czjtF2gsA%3D%3D8054811 – reference: LiHYangSZhangYXiangJChenHThoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomaJ Surg Oncol.201210554855210.1002/jso.2214822105736 – reference: Koen TalsmaAShapiroJLoomanCWNVan HagenPSteyerbergEWVan Der GaastALymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prognostic and therapeutic impact on survivalAnn Surg.201426078679310.1097/SLA.00000000000009651:STN:280:DC%2BC2M3mslGqtw%3D%3D25379850 – reference: GreensteinAJLitleVRSwansonSJDivinoCMPackerSWisniveskyJPEffect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancerCancer.20081121239124610.1002/cncr.2330918224663 – reference: CastoroCScarpaMCagolMRuolACavallinFAlfieriRNodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distributionAnn Surg Oncol.2011183743375410.1245/s10434-011-1753-921556952 – reference: IgakiHKatoHTachimoriYSatoHPrognostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinomas of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissectionEur J Cardiothorac Surg.20011988789310.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-11:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjs1aqsg%3D%3D11404147 – reference: American Cancer SocietyGlobal cancer facts & figures20153AtlantaAmerican Cancer Society164 – reference: PhillipsAWLagardeSMNavidiMDisepBGriffinSMImpact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival, post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transthoracic esophagectomyAnn Surg.201726575075610.1097/SLA.000000000000173727467444 – reference: RizkNPIshwaranHRiceTWChenLQSchipperPHKeslerKAOptimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancerAnn Surg.2010251465010.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee20032718 – reference: SasakoMSanoTYamamotoSSairenjiMAraiKKinoshitaTLeft thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trialLancet Oncol.2006764465110.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-516887481 – reference: TachimoriYNagaiYKanamoriNHokamuraNIgakiHPattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage systemDis Esophagus.201124333810.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7hsFKhsg%3D%3D20626450 – reference: ZhangYEpidemiology of esophageal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol.2013195598560610.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598240393513769895 – volume: 20 start-page: 4016 year: 2013 ident: 7316_CR16 publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3141-0 – volume: 16 start-page: 1090 year: 2015 ident: 7316_CR5 publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6 – volume: 251 start-page: 46 year: 2010 ident: 7316_CR31 publication-title: Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee – volume: 64 start-page: 381 year: 2015 ident: 7316_CR2 publication-title: Gut. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124 – volume: 347 start-page: 1662 year: 2002 ident: 7316_CR26 publication-title: N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022343 – volume: 18 start-page: 3743 year: 2011 ident: 7316_CR12 publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9 – volume: 15 start-page: 769 year: 1999 ident: 7316_CR21 publication-title: Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00122-0 – volume: 7 start-page: 644 year: 2006 ident: 7316_CR25 publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70766-5 – volume: 247 start-page: 365 year: 2008 ident: 7316_CR8 publication-title: Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf – ident: 7316_CR27 – volume: 6 start-page: 167 year: 2017 ident: 7316_CR9 publication-title: Ann Cardiothorac Surg. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.16 – volume: 38 start-page: 210 year: 2012 ident: 7316_CR10 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.022 – volume: 8 start-page: 359 year: 2013 ident: 7316_CR6 publication-title: J Thorac Oncol. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827e1f6d – ident: 7316_CR28 doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.04 – volume: 14 start-page: 191 year: 2001 ident: 7316_CR19 publication-title: Dis Esophagus. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x – volume: 260 start-page: 786 year: 2014 ident: 7316_CR29 publication-title: Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000965 – volume: 265 start-page: 750 year: 2017 ident: 7316_CR30 publication-title: Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001737 – volume: 26 start-page: 107 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 7316_CR4 publication-title: Eur J Cancer Prev. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000249 – volume: 19 start-page: 887 year: 2001 ident: 7316_CR15 publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00701-1 – volume: 44 start-page: 613 year: 2018 ident: 7316_CR32 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.004 – volume: 112 start-page: 1239 year: 2008 ident: 7316_CR7 publication-title: Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309 – volume: 21 start-page: 4592 year: 2003 ident: 7316_CR22 publication-title: J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.095 – volume: 355 start-page: 11 year: 2006 ident: 7316_CR23 publication-title: N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 – volume: 36 start-page: 480 year: 2009 ident: 7316_CR13 publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056 – volume: 19 start-page: 5598 year: 2013 ident: 7316_CR24 publication-title: World J Gastroenterol. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598 – volume: 23 start-page: 3155 year: 2012 ident: 7316_CR3 publication-title: Ann Oncol. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds181 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Global cancer facts & figures year: 2015 ident: 7316_CR1 – volume: 24 start-page: 410 issue: 5 year: 1994 ident: 7316_CR18 publication-title: Surg Today. doi: 10.1007/BF01427033 – volume: 105 start-page: 548 year: 2012 ident: 7316_CR17 publication-title: J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1002/jso.22148 – volume: 129 start-page: 103 year: 2001 ident: 7316_CR14 publication-title: Surgery. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.110024 – volume: 24 start-page: 33 year: 2011 ident: 7316_CR20 publication-title: Dis Esophagus. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x – volume: 28 start-page: 41 year: 2014 ident: 7316_CR11 publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002 |
SSID | ssj0017305 |
Score | 2.4651852 |
Snippet | Introduction
Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens... Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary... IntroductionEsophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 2063 |
SubjectTerms | Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Biopsy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Classification systems Demography Esophageal cancer Esophageal carcinoma Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophagectomy - trends Esophagogastric Junction - pathology Esophagogastric Junction - surgery Esophagus Follow-Up Studies Humans International Agencies Lymph Node Excision - trends Lymph nodes Lymphatic system Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastases Middle Aged Oncology Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends Prognosis Squamous cell carcinoma Surgeons Surgery Surgical Oncology Surveys and Questionnaires Thoracic Oncology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED_BkBAviG8CAxmJN7Bo_JnwgqbRakKMFzapb5Hj2KLSSMfaIfVP4L_mznEzlYm9xnaT9Hd3-d3ZdwfwFlH2k2Akt0FFrowI3HU28kgxDxFCO-kooH_8zRydqi9zPc8Bt1U-Vrm1iclQd0tPMfIPqFlUug_p9afzX5y6RtHuam6hcRvuUOkyOtJl56PDVaL06rTbaVCphdE5aUYoTalzStL5C0rhkaXh9e6H6RrbvH5o8p-d0_RBmj2A-5lJsoMB-odwK_SP4O5x3it_DH8-594naAnYomdTaliA1gPXHBLUF-z7kBJNgydooFdsGdM1wo0d5GLjzPUdm1KofE3jXzcIv0NjRdH-n5uPbLZIeTFpsevZToSRfu132DyB09n05PCI58YL3Cur1lx5o23nTVCtNq3Toiu7WFfBIL9w1tXRlujJILUro6qccF4bFw1afV_Fynsrn8Jev-zDc2BeSu0MEgNpI7qSyE5qh15Kq1vkLlHFAsrtv974XJWcmmOcNeSdIFLNgFSDSDUJqaYu4N245nyoyXHj7P0tmE3Wz1VzJU0FvBmHUbNou8T1YXmZ5hgtKjOpCng2YD_eTlJ4SwpZgN2RinECVe3eHekXP1L1boOctaT7vt_Kz9Vj_f8tXtz8Fi_hnhhkGUV6H_bWF5fhFbKldfs6qcRf2rgRUw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2195733875 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2196528608 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6545175 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9NAEB-8OxBfxG9znmUF3zTQZL8S32pNPdQ7RK9Qn8Jms8sVND2uPaF_gv-1M5sPqaeCT4XsbtL2NzP5zczOLMBzRNmOneKxdsLHQqUuNrX2saeYR-pcNa4poH9yqo7n4t1CLrqisHW_271PSQZLHTogCEnFboLTjgkquuGJivM9OJDku6MUz9PJkDtAmZUhx6lQlVMlu1KZP99j93V0jWNe3yr5W740vIZmd-B2xx_ZpAX8LtxwzT24edJlyO_DjzfdiSeo_2zZsIKOKUCbgWumBPAl-9wWQtPgGZrlNVv5cI3QYpOuxTgzTc0KCpBvaPzDFkE3aKIoxv9t-4rNlqEaJiw2DduJK9LdvrvtA5jPirPpcdwdtxBbocUmFlZJXVvlRCVVZWRaJ7XPM6eQVRhtcq8T9F-Q0CVeZCY1VirjFdp6m_nMWs0fwn6zatxjYJZzaRTSAa49OpDISXKDvkklK2QsXvgIkv5fL23Xi5yOxPhakk-CSJUtUiUiVQakyjyCF8Oai7YTxz9nH_Vglp1Wrku0ztT-EV20CJ4Nw6hPlCQxjVtdhTlKppkaZxE8arEfHscpqMVTHoHekYphAvXq3h1pluehZ7dCpprQc1_28vPra_39Vxz-3_QncCttZRtF_Aj2N5dX7ilypk01gj290CM4mLz98r7Az9fF6cdPeHWqpqOgPj8BRXcTKg |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9NAEB6VVIK-IG4CBRYJnsAi3ss2EkKlTZTSJEKQSn0z6_WuGgmc0qSg_AT-DL-RGV9VqOhbX727vubYb2Z2ZgBeIJVtz2kRRE76QGruApNHPvDk8-DOZb2cHPrjiR4eyo9H6mgD_jS5MHSsstGJpaLO55Z85G9Qsqh0H8Lr9yc_AuoaRdHVpoVGxRYHbvULTbbFu_09pO9Lzgf96e4wqLsKBFZGchlIq1WUW-1kpnRmFM_D3Cex07h5msgkPgoRpiNuCb2MDTdWaeM1qjQb-9jaSOB9r8GmFGjKdGDzQ3_y6XMbt0B5UWV8VaMa4VrVaTpcKkrWk4JOfFDSkAh1kKxvhRfw7cVjmv_EasstcHALbtbYle1UzHYbNlxxB66P6-j8Xfi9V3dbQd3DZgXrU4sE1Fe4ZpeY65R9qZKwaXCKW8KCzX15jTiF7dTlzZkpctYn5_ySxkcrZDiD6pHiC99Xb9lgVmbilItNwdZ8mnS3n251Dw6vhCj3oVPMC_cQmBVCGY1QREQejVfEQ4lBuyhTGaIlL30Xwuavp7aug07tOL6lZA8hpdKKUilSKi0plSZdeNWuOamqgFw6e7shZlprhEV6zr9deN4OoyxTgMYUbn5WztGKx7oXd-FBRfv2cYIcaoKLLkRrXNFOoDrh6yPF7LisF64RJYf03NcN_5y_1v-_4tHlX_EMbgyn41E62p8cPIYtXvE1svc2dJanZ-4JYrVl9rQWEAZfr1om_wKJmFA8 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZaxRBEC5ihOCLeDsatQV90iE7fc4IIiG7S2IOBBPYt7GnpxsXdDZmN8r-BP-Sv86qucIazFtep7vnqqO_quqqAniFVHYDr0VsvAyx1NzHtjQhDuTz4N4Xg5Ic-odHevdEfpyoyRr86XJh6FhlpxNrRV3OHPnIt1CyqHQfwuut0B6L-DQcfzj9EVMHKYq0du00GhbZ98tfaL7N3-8NkdavOR-Pjnd247bDQOykkYtYOq1M6bSXhdKFVbxMypClXuNGao3NgkkQsiOGSYJMLbdOaRs0qjeXhtQ5I_C-N-CmESohGTOT3thLUHJUHWnVqFC4Vm3CDpeK0vakoLMflD4kEh1nq5viJaR7-cDmP1HbejMc34HbLYpl2w3b3YU1X92DjcM2Tn8ffg_bviuohdi0YiNqloCaC9fsEJudsc9NOjYNHuPmMGezUF8jnmHbbaFzZquSjchNv6DxgyWynkVFSZGG78t3bDytc3LqxbZiK95NuttPv3wAJ9dCkoewXs0q_xiYE0JZjaBEmIBmLCKjzKKFVKgCcVOQIYKk--u5ayuiU2OObzlZRkipvKFUjpTKa0rlWQRv-jWnTT2QK2dvdsTMW90wzy84OYKX_TBKNYVqbOVn5_UcrXiqB2kEjxra948T5FoTXERgVriin0AVw1dHqunXunK4Rryc0HPfdvxz8Vr__4onV3_FC9hAScwP9o72n8It3rA1cvcmrC_Ozv0zBG2L4nktHQy-XLc4_gWDvFMM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+in+Esophageal+Cancer+Surgery+in+Terms+of+Surgical+Approach+and+Extent+of+Lymphadenectomy%3A+Findings+of+an+International+Survey&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=van+Rijswijk%2C+A.+S.&rft.au=Hagens%2C+E.+R.+C.&rft.au=van+der+Peet%2C+D.+L.&rft.au=van+Berge+Henegouwen%2C+M.+I.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.pub=Springer+International+Publishing&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2063&rft.epage=2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245%2Fs10434-019-07316-9&rft.externalDocID=10_1245_s10434_019_07316_9 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |