Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs

• Published in: Animal cognition Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 1427 - 1442
• Main Authors: Abdai, Judit, Bartus, Dalma, Kraus, Sylvain, Gedai, Zsuzsanna, Laczi, Beatrix, Miklósi, Ádám
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agents (artificial intelligence); Animal behavior; Animal cognition; Animals; Behavioral Sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Conspecifics; Cues; Delay; Dogs; Humans; Life Sciences; Long term memory; Memory; Memory, Long-Term; Original Paper; Problem Solving; Psychology Research; Recognition; Recognition, Psychology; Zoology; Animal-robot interaction; Robot; Dog; Individual recognition; Memory
• ISSN: 1435-9448; 1435-9456; 1435-9456
• DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01624-6

Investigation of individual recognition (IR) is difficult due to the lack of proper control of cues and previous experiences of subjects. Utilization of artificial agents (Unidentified Moving Objects: UMOs) may offer a better approach than using conspecifics or humans as partners. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether dogs are able to develop IR of UMOs (that is stable for at least 24 h) or that they only retain a more generalised memory about them. The UMO helped dogs to obtain an unreachable ball and played with them. One day, one week or one month later, we tested whether dogs display specific behaviour toward the familiar UMO over unfamiliar ones (four-way choice test). Dogs were also re-tested in the same helping context and playing interaction. Subjects did not approach the familiar UMO sooner than the others; however, they gazed at the familiar UMO earlier during re-testing of the problem solving task, irrespectively of the delay. In Experiment 2, we repeated the same procedure with human partners, applying a two-way choice test after a week delay, to study whether lack of IR was specific to the UMO. Dogs did not approach the familiar human sooner than the unfamiliar, but they gazed at the familiar partner earlier during re-testing. Thus, dogs do not seem to recognise an individual UMO or human after a short experience, but they remember the interaction with the novel partner in general, even after a long delay. We suggest that dogs need more experience with a specific social partner for the development of long-term memory.